Darren Wilson well just ask yourself politically where are his barbs most directed. Then ask yourself what views he espouses. As bigots go he is way out in front of those he has a pop at. In fact the mental gymnastics he has to go through to hold the opinions he does, let alone have a go at those he calls bigots is truly Olympian standard. I find him quite funny on occasion but his political views are more comedic than his actual material.
In every school I've ever worked in, the case for atheism and some of the blasphemy that goes with it has been made. What should be more commonly debated in sensible public forums is the notion that mankind only comes to know and think through the limitless benevolence of the creator. The movement away from godliness has come hand in hand with a dangerous reliance on science and technology. An atheistic mindset is ultimately less successful. Particularly in the next life.
Utterly compelling and I agree with everything stated here. Why can we not have Stewart Lee do a tour of schools? His personality and complete ease with any subject coupled with a beautiful use of language would enlighten any classroom.
Remember when Lee was opposed to censorship and did a documentary complaining about how his opera was censored? Well now we know it was all total bullsh*t - he's now protesting to have an interviewer censored for doing an interview with someone he disagrees with. Oh and he also used to pretend to be opposed to totalitarianism and pro-freedom, but as with all leftists this too is demonstrable nonsense, because he wants the state, lead by the Tories BTW, to be able to force people to be injected with experimental and dangerous drugs four times a year. Absolutely inexcusable behaviour. He's gone from one of my favourite comedians to probably my least favourite living person.
@C Stew There is some real hate out there. Of the hate crimes based on a religious bias, `60.2 percent were victims of crimes motivated by offenders’ anti-Jewish bias.` ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2019/topic-pages/victims
@Jack Daw Two things to say when people make that Pascal's Wager argument: which god? There's thousands of religions, each mutually exclusive. Funny that god makes no appearance in the natural world, yet people still believe in fairy tales. To you, this sort of logic might be blasphemy, but to me, this is religion losing arguments. Are you getting it yet?
I consider myself educated (and still quite ignorant), but I always learn and have something new to think about when I listen to Stewart Lee - Stewart is a very clever bloke - keep it coming Stewart!
Its from a scooby doo feature: "Scooby Doo and the pirate zombie jungle island." And neither Partridge or any peartree was in this episode, eventhou they were specifically written into the script. But due to more than 30 year old budget cuts, they had to be removed.
@@FlyingSpaghettiMonster2000 Yes but who is doing the canceling these days, its the liberals isn't it.... so what does that tell you.. It tells me, the liberals of today, are not really liberals at all..
I can remember when I first questioned the Catholic church. I was 12 years old sat in church with my mum shaking hands in peace with members of the congregation and I thought that's all well and good inside a house of worship, but what about outside in the real world? I like the quiet reflection you can have in the more ancient parochial buildings, when you are left alone with your thoughts without the intrusion of the 'Mass', but I can get that from looking out to sea. I believe in people, and love.
God is in the world and in people. Not one other object among others, or one other person among others. He is the source of all objects and persons. The love you feel and describe there any intelligent Christian would recognise as contact with God, but it is still far removed. Religion is guiding your sense closer towards God and guiding your life into alignment with him. Which is the centre of everything.
@@DuskAndHerEmbrace13 With respect, that reads as complete gibberish. There is absolutely no evidence for the existence of a god, and a god is not required as explanation for the love we feel, or anything else for that matter. It's mythology. If you can provide evidence to prove me wrong, I am all ears.
Mocking religion? And so it should be mocked, ridiculed, not only for the stupidity of believing in something for which there is not a single shred of evidence but mainly for the personal and mass hatred, misery, wars and death carried out in it's name. As Richard Dawkins said in an interview "When was the last time an atheist flew an aeroplane into a skyscraper" (paraphrased). Religion is not only primitive it is divisive, disgusting and kills.
The Goodness Gracious Me sketch being banned because 300 people out of 5 MILLION complained is fucking ridiculous.Letting the minority dictate what others can see is worrying
All these people are so well-spoken. Comparing the discourse seen here with an average American political issue interview just, well, it gives me conniptions.
An excellent , reasoned and informative programme. Thoroughly enjoyed watching it again and, frankly, I am quite amused at the idea that some people really believe that a Pan dimensional ,Omnipotent Super Being would actually need them to stick up for it.
The current war on trans people in the UK is being conducted in the courts by evangelical Christian activist lawyers and by religious activists at the top level of government. Some members of the UK government at top level have been openly talking to Christian Nationalist groups in the USA.
I remember when "The Last Temptation of Christ" was released and I went to see it in Raleigh NC. I was VERY excited about the movie. My parents were Methodists (and, hence, pretty harmless, really) and they never ONCE said, "You should behave this way and believe this way blah blah blah". If anything, I think we went to church and Sunday school because THEIR folks had done it, and their folks etc., and it was basically just a social construct. Later in their lives, they pretty much stopped going altogether. But anyway .... that is my background. (And I'm an atheist.) When I got to the theatre, there were about 12-15 people outside PROTESTING. For them, depicting Christ (who was MADE to be played by Willem Defoe BTW) as possibly living a "human" life, loving a woman, having a wife and child - that was the highest form of blasphemy ever suggested! Oh NO! We can't have THAT! They actually were carrying signs saying stuff like, "Close this theatre!", "This whole cast will be thrown into hell!" or "The devil possesses Martin Scorsese!" (I am not joking. Who could forget THAT one?) They looked 100% ridiculous. Of course, this made peeps like me even MORE determined to see the film and I came out of it going, "Wow!" I'd never been exposed to thinking like that before. The movie was nothing short of (pardon the word) miraculous for me because, besides being a completely BEAUTIFUL film, it made me start thinking in so many other ways. I decided that the film made Christ MORE divine because HE HAD been a human man, dealing with basic life things and trying to teach people elementary tenants of good behavior in a terribly dangerous time and who, for all the good he did, got killed by the political machine that was Roman rule. Why? Because he challenged established government and law. People like him couldn't be allowed to go around or else the entire Roman way of life would collapse because .... people would start thinking for themselves. Christians say you have to have a "personal relationship" with Christ to be a good Christian. Well, how much more "personal" can you get than to identify with another human being pushed to his limits and still managing to be a gentle, kind and caring individual who - when pushed, like the story of him in the temple with the moneylenders - recognizes injustice and speaks UP? That is - or should be - universal.
That Christians have to have a 'personal relationship with Christ' is a result of Protestantism. In the old days, it was less important that you actually believed, and more important that you did what the pope said i.e. respect Roman rule. Protestants said their individual relationship to god was the important thing, and that's what made it more about belief and less about practical observance
I thought this was brilliant. A relevant documentary that manages to be both serious and funny . Gotta love Alan Moore too: I met him once, and he was just as witty, interesting, intelligent and warm (and quirky) as he seems on screen.
What I love most is these religious people bashing science while they drive a new car, probably the most advanced scientific conglomeration of scientific invention the average person will own.
Glad to see, even with all the hate his play got by these people, that he takes an open-minded, wide ranging view on religion, even as an atheist. A breath of fresh air in a sphere so often infested with lazy bigotry.
i'd like to see stu and polly toynbee talk more... i''ven heard loads of stu and allen moore before, but i get the feeling an extended section iwth PT would be quite rewarding viewing.
Thats the first time Ive ever seen Alan Moore crack a smile. Its beautiful seeing two of my heroes in the same room, clearly liking each others company. If you are truly religious and intelligent, isnt the only logical conclusion that the universe is run by a vain, jeallous, worship needy, vengeful smiter of a beast that you just better get onside with? I think most religious folk are just trying to buy insurance for the soul, and behave no more moraly than an athiest.
Enjoyable and informing viewing. A touch on the unbalaced side in terms of the number of those representing religious viewpoints vs else, but that's probably what Lee was going for. These sorts of programs make you wonder 'just how many people have their worlds flipped on their heads after watching programs like these?' Hopefully that number is exponentially increasing, because it is freedom of thought (if such a thing exists) which is pretty crucial (one imagines) if a society is to move toward enlightened times.
In the entire first Christian century Jesus is not mentioned by a single Greek or Roman historian, religion scholar, politician, philosopher or poet. His name never occurs in a single inscription, and it is never found in a single piece of private correspondence. Zero! Zip references! Bart D. Ehrman
Wasn't Josephus near the end of the first century? I never put much stock in the Josephus and even if it was it would still be an enormous lack of reference to someone as supposedly huge as Jesus, but in the pursuit of accuracy here...
@@anthonybowman3423 - Josephus never mentioned him either. No copy of his history from prior to the 4th Century contains the abruptly incongruent out-of-context passage about Jesus that gets inserted centuries later by church founder Origen. It's not even a _good_ forgery.
As a Waterstones employee may I point out that that small gesture serves no purpose other than to make our lives more difficult? You're not making any point other than "I'm an egocentric twat who thinks my decision to shun religion makes me better than the rest of you." On behalf of my colleagues could you kindly stop doing this? It's not religious fundamentalists who suffer when we can't find books that you've hidden or when we have to spend part of our day second guessing your comedic inclinations. Thanks.
You have mistaken me for somebody with an ego, where as you obviously wear one on your sleeve. Also I'm not so dumb that I don't know you are trolling, that isn't even good trolling. More of a cover for how you really feel.
I'm not trolling, I'm a genuine Waterstones employee and it genuinely does not give us any amusement or even a smile when even a second of our day is wasted dealing with your failed attempts at comedy.
Very thought provoking :) I remember being very surprised by the outcry about those shitty characatures, when most people I spoke to had such a level headed lack of response to such petty antagonism. We have much to fear from paranoid religious conservatives everywhere.
The point of the Danish Cartoons was to expose the intolerance of Islam. The point is the question of whether it is desirable or even safe to have such people in your country, in the West. The response by some Christians that they, too, ought to be allowed to be outraged and attack such people and groups as might lampoon their silly religions, is outstanding proof of the sort of retrograde effect of religious belief on civilization.
2:38 paradise lost 5:43 isn't 1508 7:30 god's no 8:00 life of Brian Christian 8:39 rashdi Muslim 9:15 Behzti Sikh 9:32 against free speech 10:33 race to be offended. Fatwa joke 11:24 manufactured protest 12:07 Danish cartoon cycling helmet 13:40 against religious protection 14:40 no right to be not offended 14:52 exception 16:07 Islam push for protection 18:40 BBC protection of religion 19:15 religious school division 20:15 divine right rather than electorate 21:19 jokes about beliefs democratic truth 22:15 protestants Vs Catholic 22:30 offense Vs provocation for the sake of it 22:53 new communities should adapt 23:1024:12 legitimate religions 23:58 Iraq war 26:25 Paris Hilton 27:55 religious fundamentalism from religious revivalism 80 years ago 28:26 USA religion politics 29:52 faith schools - selection bias 31:3534:08 religion taught as facts in school 32:50 USA George Bush religious loony 33:00 no secular school 33:40 politics use religion 34:45 Christian against Hinduism 35:1636:05 religious taught in schools good Vs bad 35:32 accused of blasphemy 36:40 open debate free speech 38:00 beliefs not obstruction to dialogue Monty python
Lovely post. God bless you, Stew. On a religious note, the statement 'God Is Not Mocked' is simply that. It's on a par with 'the Sun heats up the Earth'. Simple fact, which you may or may not agree with. But it does mean that protestors asking that God be not mocked are not understanding that simple statement.
Same view here, I went to a UK state school, we were forced to learn religious education the Church of England way, from years 1 - 3, I opted out (backed up from a letter from my parents) and spent that lesson in the library self learning about all religions, I'm not special or clever, but possibly more rounded than most in this area, I would urge everyone to do the same, I think religious tolerance is key.... Not fighting for one corner
28:40. The selection of Mike Johnson, a self-admitted fundamentalist Southern Baptist Christian, as Speaker of the US House of Representatives, with medieval opinions on almost every current major issue, proves Mr. Lee's view that we are regressing back to the Dark Ages. I'm expecting a rerun of the Salem Witch Trials to begin any day soon.
It's 2023 and church attendance has continued to fall with now only 5% of Brits attending regularly. Even at the time of Jerry Springer - The Musical, attendance was barely double-digit. That such a tiny minority would have such a disproportionate impact on the media is insane. That this piece of art was so impacted by fringe loonies is such a shame.
I was on a long coach journey recently and the man I was sitting next to informed me that he believes Jesus was perfect, the only perfect human being. So why didn't he found a better religion, if he was? If he was so perfect, why are his followers STILL contradicting each other about what he said and what we are meant to believe - and why do so many people not follow him at all? In fat, why did he found a religion whose central tenets have always been routinely lambasted by its own followers? Situations like that coach journey are terrible temptations...... tempting to quietly accept, because of the painful embarrassment of thinking out loud, utter crap, posing as goodness and moral fortitude. Praises be to Stewart Lee ! - for speaking out, barefacedly.
Thank you...that was lovely ....and frightening. Sometime in the 60's ( I think ) someone wrote a play about the lifeboat rescues from a sinking ship of Whitby. The lifeboat crew , going back into the storm for about the 4th or 5th time were drunk and most drowned when the lifeboat overturned. 150 years after the event ( about ) and the playwright was driven from Whitby by death threats....... just saying that it isn't only religion that inspires irrational hatred.
There will always be exceptions where nutters and their nutty ways are concerned. That said, it IS mostly religion / right wing scum to be found at the bottom of that particular barrel. Capitalism devised religion and saw how the poor lapped it up. And that's why pretty much every government around the world loves it and the system is based on it.
No, it isn't only religion that inspires irrational hatred - but it is the primary force that attempts to make it look rational and culturally acceptable. You can get far more people to agree that driving the playwright out of Whitby was crazy than you can get to agree that killing a cartoonist for drawing Muhammad is wrong.
As a teenager I was a Christian and tried to follow a way of compassion and peace. It was other Christians who put me off the religion whereas my best friends, decent kind kids, were atheists. There are of course massive hideous faults in the bible, especially the old testament, but also the new testament. Most of the bible pollutes some of its decent aspects and there is a lot of holier than thou and repressive hypocrisy. Gandhi said he liked Christ but not Christians.
I always thought that was funny. People always talk about the New Testament like it's so morally superior to the Old Testament. Nobody gets condemned to excruciating torture for time beyond your imagination in the Old Testament. The New Testament condemns MOST people to that. Even if it was just one guy, that'd be exceptionally morally dubious.
Beautifully observed narrative. Thank you, Stewart Lee, I've just added you to my pantheon of heroes. I hope you do shows in Dublin because I would camp out to get a ticket. I loved your monologue on Richard Hammond and thanks also for turning me on to Mr Funny himself Henning Wehn. I'm off to check your tour dates to see if you're coming to Ireland. That was a brilliant documentary. Please do more...
@@peteconrad2077 They are funded by Open Democracy and the Gates Foundation. If they had to survive on sales and ad revenue they wouldn't exist. It isn't independent in the slightest.
@@thevo4100 they are funded by sales and thousands of donors. The ones you mentioned are amongst the larger ones but they exercise no control over the paper and do not contribute a controlling amount. Contrast that with the billionaire owned right wing rage that you read. They’re independent in every meaningful way, especially free for the bigoted stupidity of fat right billionaires.
@@peteconrad2077 How do you know what control their donors exert? Why are they giving them money? Out of kindness? Why not say the same for other papers? Because left good, right bad? I assume that's the depth of the reasoning here.
I love Stewart Lee and find all this right-wing, fundamentalist garbage impossible to take seriously. But I realize that it IS serious and that these folks are seriously dangerous to functional democratic societies.
To answer the question - There is nothing wrong with blasphemy. I don't accept the notion of blasphemy because I don't accept that it is possible to offend non-existent "beings" or to offend people by talking about or portraying the non-existent "beings" they believe in.
I love Stewart Lee, but focusing on whether the Danish cartoons were funny or "clumsy" is completely missing the point. The response (death threats, riots etc) to them was inexcusable.
Yes, it didn't escape my notice that satire of Christianity was described as "thoughtful" or "insightful" or "affectionate" while cartoons satirising Islam were branded "clumsy".
@@tomherbert2361 I'm sure he did mean that, but as the guy above points out, his language and focus are noticeably different when talking about stuff to do with Islam. Let's not forget that innocent people died as a result of those cartoons. Perhaps he should be more concerned about that.
You have the choice to follow which ever religion you please. But it is a choice and therefore should be held up for the same discussion as any other choice, be that political or philosophical.
"satire is used by people who think before they speak" sorry, what? Satire is well constructed and a highly thought out process designed to criticise a given issue. How the hell is it anything like what you just said?
Yeah, sorry. I think I must have been really tired when I wrote that... for some reason I thought you wrote literally the opposite of what you said. weird.
he gave it to us straight, like a pear cider, made from 100% pear
PEARS! is it one giant pear????
@@YourPalHDee yes
That pear cider joke has let itself go...
100% pear cider has let itself go
Pear cider is grim
"Whether you think of the people behind me as hilarious bigots or well intentioned fools, they are none the less, divs." Hahaha!
That yellow shirt is excellent
The joke was on him. Those he served up to bolster his point are far more hypocritical than those they deride.....including Stewart Lee.
@@Telcontar1962 I have no idea what the point you are trying to make.
Darren Wilson well just ask yourself politically where are his barbs most directed. Then ask yourself what views he espouses.
As bigots go he is way out in front of those he has a pop at. In fact the mental gymnastics he has to go through to hold the opinions he does, let alone have a go at those he calls bigots is truly Olympian standard.
I find him quite funny on occasion but his political views are more comedic than his actual material.
@Wilbur Wafer or you are just too thick to understand?
I know what my money is on :)
Blasphemy is a victimless crime
Unless its solid or sharpened blasphemy.
***** should be a warning at the front page of the internet
***** Yeah, a warning about jimmyshitbags' profile photo...Holy shit!
;o)
It's not a crime
Its not even a crime. A crime is taking our money to spend on bullshit, and the government allows it.
I find it pretty offensive when I am told that I am a wicked sinner who deserves eternal punishment.
Dave P, pussy.
@@Waldowsky The irony went straight over your head didn't it?
@Keith Farrell You're not 'a wicked sinner who deserves eternal punishment.' You're a very naughty boy!
Well stop kicking your dog.
@@johnlowdon5809 That particular euphemism is a new one to me.
It's about time we in Britain told our politicians to make our country a secular one.
Remove charitable status from all faith groups.
Same here in the US. And it's getting worse. :(
Why?
"our politicians" and "our country" - ? lol
Yeah! Bind charitable status to charitable deeds. Too simple to be done, though, I guess.
TheTimbalanders nonsense, I’m a lefty, and I despise ALL religions.
Oh shit. "Presumably because it isn't 1508" :D too good.
This should be required viewing in all RE classes.
Yes and so should The Life of Brian, followed by a long discussion
In every school I've ever worked in, the case for atheism and some of the blasphemy that goes with it has been made. What should be more commonly debated in sensible public forums is the notion that mankind only comes to know and think through the limitless benevolence of the creator. The movement away from godliness has come hand in hand with a dangerous reliance on science and technology. An atheistic mindset is ultimately less successful. Particularly in the next life.
Mustafa Russell would love to know how you know what helps you in the afterlife?! I suspect you may have one book you value above others?
@@HJJallday if you are sincere in wanting to know, I will happily tell
As long as RE is on any curriculum, atheism, or any counterpoint should be demonstrated equally...
Stewart is the quintessential Brit, and I mean that in every positive way
No such thing
And Johnnie Rotten
Utterly compelling and I agree with everything stated here. Why can we not have Stewart Lee do a tour of schools? His personality and complete ease with any subject coupled with a beautiful use of language would enlighten any classroom.
Lol. Are you his agent?
Remember when Lee was opposed to censorship and did a documentary complaining about how his opera was censored?
Well now we know it was all total bullsh*t - he's now protesting to have an interviewer censored for doing an interview with someone he disagrees with.
Oh and he also used to pretend to be opposed to totalitarianism and pro-freedom, but as with all leftists this too is demonstrable nonsense, because he wants the state, lead by the Tories BTW, to be able to force people to be injected with experimental and dangerous drugs four times a year. Absolutely inexcusable behaviour.
He's gone from one of my favourite comedians to probably my least favourite living person.
@@ThunderChunky101 That sounds like a difficult break-up. My condolences.💐
@@ThunderChunky101 which interviewer is he protesting to have censored, and who did he interview?
Putting Lee in schools is a lovely idea until he starts picking on one part of the class for not finding him as funny as the rest of the class.
Blasphemy: speech that has been outlawed to prevent your religion from losing arguments.
@C Stew There is some real hate out there. Of the hate crimes based on a religious bias, `60.2 percent were victims of crimes motivated by offenders’ anti-Jewish bias.` ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2019/topic-pages/victims
@@1inchPunchBowl That was a reply to a now deleted message ... keep up, right back at you.
... or are you just trolling?
@Jack Daw I think religion lost many an argument.
@Jack Daw Two things to say when people make that Pascal's Wager argument: which god? There's thousands of religions, each mutually exclusive. Funny that god makes no appearance in the natural world, yet people still believe in fairy tales. To you, this sort of logic might be blasphemy, but to me, this is religion losing arguments. Are you getting it yet?
@Jack Daw You're a self-deluded bad joke, I have nothing more to say to you.
I consider myself educated (and still quite ignorant), but I always learn and have something new to think about when I listen to Stewart Lee - Stewart is a very clever bloke - keep it coming Stewart!
It's Health & Safety gone mad.
Gran.
True, and my printer at work prints on both side as default. When will the madness stop.
chris4072511 "You couldn't make it up"
Its from a scooby doo feature: "Scooby Doo and the pirate zombie jungle island." And neither Partridge or any peartree was in this episode, eventhou they were specifically written into the script. But due to more than 30 year old budget cuts, they had to be removed.
Ripleyesque Partridge actually said 'it's political correctness gone mad' in reply to Lynn but I can't remember why.
It's scary how this documentary is far more relevant now, 10 years after its release.
still relevant today
I'd suggest it's even worse now. We have ideologies that have no tolerance. Cannot be criticised.
Nothing should be above criticism in this country.
@@FlyingSpaghettiMonster2000 Yes but who is doing the canceling these days, its the liberals isn't it.... so what does that tell you.. It tells me, the liberals of today, are not really liberals at all..
@@simtime7591 so the ones doing the cancelling aren’t the liberals then.
@@FlyingSpaghettiMonster2000 Agreed
religions let itself go
Unbelievable ....excellent, calm, reasoned argument against outrageous rants by silly folk, who don't even understand what they are ranting about
I can remember when I first questioned the Catholic church. I was 12 years old sat in church with my mum shaking hands in peace with members of the congregation and I thought that's all well and good inside a house of worship, but what about outside in the real world? I like the quiet reflection you can have in the more ancient parochial buildings, when you are left alone with your thoughts without the intrusion of the 'Mass', but I can get that from looking out to sea. I believe in people, and love.
God is in the world and in people. Not one other object among others, or one other person among others. He is the source of all objects and persons. The love you feel and describe there any intelligent Christian would recognise as contact with God, but it is still far removed. Religion is guiding your sense closer towards God and guiding your life into alignment with him. Which is the centre of everything.
@@DuskAndHerEmbrace13 With respect, that reads as complete gibberish. There is absolutely no evidence for the existence of a god, and a god is not required as explanation for the love we feel, or anything else for that matter. It's mythology. If you can provide evidence to prove me wrong, I am all ears.
Mocking religion? And so it should be mocked, ridiculed, not only for the stupidity of believing in something for which there is not a single shred of evidence but mainly for the personal and mass hatred, misery, wars and death carried out in it's name. As Richard Dawkins said in an interview "When was the last time an atheist flew an aeroplane into a skyscraper" (paraphrased). Religion is not only primitive it is divisive, disgusting and kills.
Jack bassman and of course there’s Christopher Hitchens.
Satan has let himself go.
He looks like prince.
@@ianedmonds9191 the artist formally known as Stuart Lee?
The Goodness Gracious Me sketch being banned because 300 people out of 5 MILLION complained is fucking ridiculous.Letting the minority dictate what others can see is worrying
"They are, nonetheless, divs!" Oh Stewart, I fucking love you!
i think i love you bex
What is a div? I am a foreigner.
@@jeil5676 An idiot, half-wit, moron.
@@jeil5676 please, I hope that you’re not over here……fixing things.
God this man is extremely smart. Understand him and you understand how smart his humour is.
What a pretentious comment
Stew should put this on his website.
The thing is, he gives it to you straight. Like a pear cider, made from 100% pears
All these people are so well-spoken. Comparing the discourse seen here with an average American political issue interview just, well, it gives me conniptions.
Conniptions??? 🤣 (I did have to google it!)
Sadly we do and did have plenty of erratic dickwads as well. We just didn't feel obligated to put them on TV. We do now though.
You can get a cream for that.
I caught conniptions from a dirty girl.
How do you blaspheme against something you can't actually demonstrate to exist???
That, sir, is a fucking marvellous point.
An excellent , reasoned and informative programme. Thoroughly enjoyed watching it again and, frankly, I am quite amused at the idea that some people really believe that a Pan dimensional ,Omnipotent Super Being would actually need them to stick up for it.
28:25 aged like fine wine. This was filmed ten years ago and we're here now in 2022.
Spot on.
The current war on trans people in the UK is being conducted in the courts by evangelical Christian activist lawyers and by religious activists at the top level of government. Some members of the UK government at top level have been openly talking to Christian Nationalist groups in the USA.
Does that minister's yellow shirt and jeans combo count as blasphemy?
Nah it was dyed in pear cider that’s bla-bla-bla...
Hari krishnas use his church hall
I remember when "The Last Temptation of Christ" was released and I went to see it in Raleigh NC. I was VERY excited about the movie. My parents were Methodists (and, hence, pretty harmless, really) and they never ONCE said, "You should behave this way and believe this way blah blah blah". If anything, I think we went to church and Sunday school because THEIR folks had done it, and their folks etc., and it was basically just a social construct. Later in their lives, they pretty much stopped going altogether.
But anyway .... that is my background. (And I'm an atheist.)
When I got to the theatre, there were about 12-15 people outside PROTESTING. For them, depicting Christ (who was MADE to be played by Willem Defoe BTW) as possibly living a "human" life, loving a woman, having a wife and child - that was the highest form of blasphemy ever suggested! Oh NO! We can't have THAT! They actually were carrying signs saying stuff like, "Close this theatre!", "This whole cast will be thrown into hell!" or "The devil possesses Martin Scorsese!" (I am not joking. Who could forget THAT one?) They looked 100% ridiculous.
Of course, this made peeps like me even MORE determined to see the film and I came out of it going, "Wow!" I'd never been exposed to thinking like that before. The movie was nothing short of (pardon the word) miraculous for me because, besides being a completely BEAUTIFUL film, it made me start thinking in so many other ways. I decided that the film made Christ MORE divine because HE HAD been a human man, dealing with basic life things and trying to teach people elementary tenants of good behavior in a terribly dangerous time and who, for all the good he did, got killed by the political machine that was Roman rule.
Why? Because he challenged established government and law. People like him couldn't be allowed to go around or else the entire Roman way of life would collapse because .... people would start thinking for themselves.
Christians say you have to have a "personal relationship" with Christ to be a good Christian. Well, how much more "personal" can you get than to identify with another human being pushed to his limits and still managing to be a gentle, kind and caring individual who - when pushed, like the story of him in the temple with the moneylenders - recognizes injustice and speaks UP? That is - or should be - universal.
That Christians have to have a 'personal relationship with Christ' is a result of Protestantism. In the old days, it was less important that you actually believed, and more important that you did what the pope said i.e. respect Roman rule. Protestants said their individual relationship to god was the important thing, and that's what made it more about belief and less about practical observance
By far the most intelligent and relevant stand-up comic on the planet. Can't wait to see him in Liverpool next month.
I was brought up a Catholic and taught by nuns and I thought Jerry Springer The Opera was hilarious. I saw it five times.
canturgan interesting! Do you consider yourself a good catholic? Bc your upbringing-history doesn't clarify that.
You were obviously well educated and can think for yourself. The people protesting a springer opera could not do a join the dots.
I thought this was brilliant. A relevant documentary that manages to be both serious and funny . Gotta love Alan Moore too: I met him once, and he was just as witty, interesting, intelligent and warm (and quirky) as he seems on screen.
@12:40 "Even bastions of free speech, like the guardian " is probably the funniest line I've heard come out of Stewart's mouth.
Even funnier now that he's actively pressuring Spotify to censor Joe Rogan!
What a truly awful person.
"Whether you think of the people behind me as hysterical bigots or well intentioned fools, they are none the less...divs"
"Welcome to this avenue of trees where i have all my most profound thoughts" - love Stu xD
What I love most is these religious people bashing science while they drive a new car, probably the most advanced scientific conglomeration of scientific invention the average person will own.
Yeah, I mean say what you want about the Amish… because they’ll probably never read any comments on RUclips.
It DOES feel like 1508 sometimes....
Stewart Lee is brilliant. Great film.
Glad to see, even with all the hate his play got by these people, that he takes an open-minded, wide ranging view on religion, even as an atheist. A breath of fresh air in a sphere so often infested with lazy bigotry.
There is rarely a wise man shouting in the street.
Can the RUclips algorithm please pull this to the top. A lot of people and the government would benefit from watching this I'm sure
i'd like to see stu and polly toynbee talk more... i''ven heard loads of stu and allen moore before, but i get the feeling an extended section iwth PT would be quite rewarding viewing.
“Jerry Springer The Opera” is more relevant in 2020 than it was then to be honest.
Thats the first time Ive ever seen Alan Moore crack a smile. Its beautiful seeing two of my heroes in the same room, clearly liking each others company.
If you are truly religious and intelligent, isnt the only logical conclusion that the universe is run by a vain, jeallous, worship needy, vengeful smiter of a beast that you just better get onside with? I think most religious folk are just trying to buy insurance for the soul, and behave no more moraly than an athiest.
When I hear someone say,' as a Christian' a small part of me dies.
Enjoyable and informing viewing. A touch on the unbalaced side in terms of the number of those representing religious viewpoints vs else, but that's probably what Lee was going for. These sorts of programs make you wonder 'just how many people have their worlds flipped on their heads after watching programs like these?'
Hopefully that number is exponentially increasing, because it is freedom of thought (if such a thing exists) which is pretty crucial (one imagines) if a society is to move toward enlightened times.
I love you Stewart Lee and Alan Moore. Thank you for talking sense.
We only need a blasphemy law cos god has really let himself go...
Can't believe this was on channel 5. A reasonable look at something with no hyperbole or ridiculousness.
Wait, surely if they're Christians they're a forgiving lot?
Oh, they are, riiiiight up until the moment you do something against THEM.
my stance is, if you decide to go to war against somebody, you better be ready to fight in that war to the bitter end.
More documentaries from the peerless Mr Lee please world
In the entire first Christian century Jesus is not mentioned by a single Greek or Roman historian, religion scholar, politician, philosopher or poet. His name never occurs in a single inscription, and it is never found in a single piece of private correspondence. Zero! Zip references!
Bart D. Ehrman
Wasn't Josephus near the end of the first century? I never put much stock in the Josephus and even if it was it would still be an enormous lack of reference to someone as supposedly huge as Jesus, but in the pursuit of accuracy here...
Really? Jesus Christ.
@@anthonybowman3423 - Josephus never mentioned him either. No copy of his history from prior to the 4th Century contains the abruptly incongruent out-of-context passage about Jesus that gets inserted centuries later by church founder Origen. It's not even a _good_ forgery.
@@Torthrodhel underappreciated comment
Welcome to this avenue of trees, where I have all of my most profound thoughts! Fucking love it!
I'd give my left crucifix to be a fly on the wall in that Alan Moore and Stuart Lee chat.
Maltese fly?
David Fee They are lighter than ordinary flies.
Alan Moore knows the score.
Can you dig it?
His words are particularly pertinent this week.
I put the bible into the fiction section every time I walk through Waterstones. If I'm going to hell there better be uncut cocaine.
As a Waterstones employee may I point out that that small gesture serves no purpose other than to make our lives more difficult? You're not making any point other than "I'm an egocentric twat who thinks my decision to shun religion makes me better than the rest of you." On behalf of my colleagues could you kindly stop doing this? It's not religious fundamentalists who suffer when we can't find books that you've hidden or when we have to spend part of our day second guessing your comedic inclinations. Thanks.
You have mistaken me for somebody with an ego, where as you obviously wear one on your sleeve. Also I'm not so dumb that I don't know you are trolling, that isn't even good trolling. More of a cover for how you really feel.
Then please tell me what you are achieving?
You have no ego and yet you feel the need to make people's jobs harder just to make your rather boring and tired point?
I'm not trolling, I'm a genuine Waterstones employee and it genuinely does not give us any amusement or even a smile when even a second of our day is wasted dealing with your failed attempts at comedy.
Very thought provoking :) I remember being very surprised by the outcry about those shitty characatures, when most people I spoke to had such a level headed lack of response to such petty antagonism. We have much to fear from paranoid religious conservatives everywhere.
To quote Hitchens. "Offence is taken, not given. "
Or as Shakespeare said: *there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so* .
Offense is both taken and given. You cannot take what someone hasn't given.
Any chance we can get Songs of Praise banned for religious fundamentalism? Worth a try!
The point of the Danish Cartoons was to expose the intolerance of Islam. The point is the question of whether it is desirable or even safe to have such people in your country, in the West. The response by some Christians that they, too, ought to be allowed to be outraged and attack such people and groups as might lampoon their silly religions, is outstanding proof of the sort of retrograde effect of religious belief on civilization.
2:38 paradise lost
5:43 isn't 1508
7:30 god's no
8:00 life of Brian Christian
8:39 rashdi Muslim
9:15 Behzti Sikh
9:32 against free speech
10:33 race to be offended. Fatwa joke
11:24 manufactured protest
12:07 Danish cartoon cycling helmet
13:40 against religious protection
14:40 no right to be not offended
14:52 exception
16:07 Islam push for protection
18:40 BBC protection of religion
19:15 religious school division
20:15 divine right rather than electorate
21:19 jokes about beliefs democratic truth
22:15 protestants Vs Catholic
22:30 offense Vs provocation for the sake of it
22:53 new communities should adapt
23:10 24:12 legitimate religions
23:58 Iraq war
26:25 Paris Hilton
27:55 religious fundamentalism from religious revivalism 80 years ago
28:26 USA religion politics
29:52 faith schools - selection bias
31:35 34:08 religion taught as facts in school
32:50 USA George Bush religious loony
33:00 no secular school
33:40 politics use religion
34:45 Christian against Hinduism
35:16 36:05 religious taught in schools good Vs bad
35:32 accused of blasphemy
36:40 open debate free speech
38:00 beliefs not obstruction to dialogue Monty python
omg, you had some spare time
Whatever the complaints by the Christians, thry never cut anyone's head off.
Erm... yes they have. Christianity has plenty of blood on its hands.
@@monkeymox2544
Where? Exact places. In this century.
You are suffering from white man's guilt. A therapist could help you.
@@gollumtheartisticnewt1028 Anne Boleyn
Lol I was watching The Day Today and this came on after an episode, and I thought I was still watching it. Holy fuckz
Lovely post. God bless you, Stew. On a religious note, the statement 'God Is Not Mocked' is simply that. It's on a par with 'the Sun heats up the Earth'. Simple fact, which you may or may not agree with. But it does mean that protestors asking that God be not mocked are not understanding that simple statement.
A great little documentary by Lee.
Its mental that 300 complaints has more power than 5 million viewers .
You had me at 'divs'.
Somewhat later, less angry: schools should teach ethics, - a history of all religions and philosophy. All schools, all pupils.
Same view here, I went to a UK state school, we were forced to learn religious education the Church of England way, from years 1 - 3,
I opted out (backed up from a letter from my parents) and spent that lesson in the library self learning about all religions,
I'm not special or clever, but possibly more rounded than most in this area,
I would urge everyone to do the same, I think religious tolerance is key.... Not fighting for one corner
@@sofa-lofa4241 During your first 3 school-years you spent hours reading books on religion in the school library? That is impressive indeed!
28:40. The selection of Mike Johnson, a self-admitted fundamentalist Southern Baptist Christian, as Speaker of the US House of Representatives, with medieval opinions on almost every current major issue, proves Mr. Lee's view that we are regressing back to the Dark Ages.
I'm expecting a rerun of the Salem Witch Trials to begin any day soon.
Stewart, viewing from Perth, Western Australia. Thanks for your excellent videos!
Judas has let himself go
As an absolute skeptic, I wonder some times if the depression that seems to accompany this attitude to life is worth it.
How are you getting on?
Me too man
Alan Moore ... brilliant!! (as was the whole programme)
I love Stewart, he is brilliantly intelligent .....
19:50 Alan Moore knows the score!
Sorry, 7 years late but you sure can dig it obviously.
Mr Renfrew is excellent.
The Prophet Mohammed has let himself go...bless his name
It's 2023 and church attendance has continued to fall with now only 5% of Brits attending regularly. Even at the time of Jerry Springer - The Musical, attendance was barely double-digit. That such a tiny minority would have such a disproportionate impact on the media is insane. That this piece of art was so impacted by fringe loonies is such a shame.
I was on a long coach journey recently and the man I was sitting next to informed me that he believes Jesus was perfect, the only perfect human being. So why didn't he found a better religion, if he was? If he was so perfect, why are his followers STILL contradicting each other about what he said and what we are meant to believe - and why do so many people not follow him at all? In fat, why did he found a religion whose central tenets have always been routinely lambasted by its own followers? Situations like that coach journey are terrible temptations...... tempting to quietly accept, because of the painful embarrassment of thinking out loud, utter crap, posing as goodness and moral fortitude. Praises be to Stewart Lee ! - for speaking out, barefacedly.
Thank you...that was lovely ....and frightening.
Sometime in the 60's ( I think ) someone wrote a play about the lifeboat rescues from a sinking ship of Whitby. The lifeboat crew , going back into the storm for about the 4th or 5th time were drunk and most drowned when the lifeboat overturned. 150 years after the event ( about ) and the playwright was driven from Whitby by death threats....... just saying that it isn't only religion that inspires irrational hatred.
There will always be exceptions where nutters and their nutty ways are concerned. That said, it IS mostly religion / right wing scum to be found at the bottom of that particular barrel. Capitalism devised religion and saw how the poor lapped it up. And that's why pretty much every government around the world loves it and the system is based on it.
No, it isn't only religion that inspires irrational hatred - but it is the primary force that attempts to make it look rational and culturally acceptable. You can get far more people to agree that driving the playwright out of Whitby was crazy than you can get to agree that killing a cartoonist for drawing Muhammad is wrong.
Morrisey's let himself go
I wondered why Tanita Tikaram was talking about Christianity.
John Parrot the snooker player.
This is the first one that has made me audibly snort
“Even bastions of free speech like the guardian wouldn’t publish the cartoons...” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 that quote aged well.
4:50 Insults on leaflets are like holy water off a duck's back...
or like a child's holy urine off an old man's face.
Great episode, thanks for sharing it!
As many christians actually watched that play as have actually read their bible.
As a teenager I was a Christian and tried to follow a way of compassion and peace. It was other Christians who put me off the religion whereas my best friends, decent kind kids, were atheists. There are of course massive hideous faults in the bible, especially the old testament, but also the new testament. Most of the bible pollutes some of its decent aspects and there is a lot of holier than thou and repressive hypocrisy. Gandhi said he liked Christ but not Christians.
I always thought that was funny. People always talk about the New Testament like it's so morally superior to the Old Testament. Nobody gets condemned to excruciating torture for time beyond your imagination in the Old Testament. The New Testament condemns MOST people to that. Even if it was just one guy, that'd be exceptionally morally dubious.
@@anthonybowman3423 Neither Testament is as good a read as The Bible according to Spike Milligan
Beautifully observed narrative. Thank you, Stewart Lee, I've just added you to my pantheon of heroes. I hope you do shows in Dublin because I would camp out to get a ticket. I loved your monologue on Richard Hammond and thanks also for turning me on to Mr Funny himself Henning Wehn. I'm off to check your tour dates to see if you're coming to Ireland. That was a brilliant documentary. Please do more...
Wish he would visit Australia....while I can understand why he doesn't, I wouldn't either, its bloody awful.
Insightful and hilarious, love it
Anyone who's religion tells them to hate something or someone, needs a new God.
I can't wait for Stuart Lees show on islam! It'll be a hoot. Who agrees?
"God" I Love Stewart Lee 😂
"Bastions of free speech, The Guardian". Funniest part of the whole thing 🤣😂
Their tremendous and prolonged support for Julian Assange being the greatest example of this bastion
Well they’re the only truly independent newspaper in the uk. So, you know, facts and all that.
@@peteconrad2077 They are funded by Open Democracy and the Gates Foundation. If they had to survive on sales and ad revenue they wouldn't exist. It isn't independent in the slightest.
@@thevo4100 they are funded by sales and thousands of donors. The ones you mentioned are amongst the larger ones but they exercise no control over the paper and do not contribute a controlling amount. Contrast that with the billionaire owned right wing rage that you read. They’re independent in every meaningful way, especially free for the bigoted stupidity of fat right billionaires.
@@peteconrad2077 How do you know what control their donors exert? Why are they giving them money? Out of kindness? Why not say the same for other papers? Because left good, right bad? I assume that's the depth of the reasoning here.
I love Stewart Lee and find all this right-wing, fundamentalist garbage impossible to take seriously. But I realize that it IS serious and that these folks are seriously dangerous to functional democratic societies.
7 years later and it's all going to absolute shit.
@@kildogery 7 years later and the people protesting are the “woke” left ready to take offence at the drop of a hat
@@wesleyashworth5061 it's health and safety gone mad!
@@kildogery hehe
@@wesleyashworth5061 and then you woke up.
To answer the question - There is nothing wrong with blasphemy. I don't accept the notion of blasphemy because I don't accept that it is possible to offend non-existent "beings" or to offend people by talking about or portraying the non-existent "beings" they believe in.
Back again in 2022, Stewart is genius
These all-powerful deities are remarkably thin-skinned.
I love Stewart Lee, but focusing on whether the Danish cartoons were funny or "clumsy" is completely missing the point. The response (death threats, riots etc) to them was inexcusable.
Yes, it didn't escape my notice that satire of Christianity was described as "thoughtful" or "insightful" or "affectionate" while cartoons satirising Islam were branded "clumsy".
I think what they mean by clumsy is just that they were shit cartoons
@@tomherbert2361 I'm sure he did mean that, but as the guy above points out, his language and focus are noticeably different when talking about stuff to do with Islam. Let's not forget that innocent people died as a result of those cartoons. Perhaps he should be more concerned about that.
@@chrisgilliver1 he clearly is concerned about it
Clumsy sounds like a euphemism for racist, imho
Just get the girl's mother to buy her blue contacts
You have the choice to follow which ever religion you please. But it is a choice and therefore should be held up for the same discussion as any other choice, be that political or philosophical.
Imagine my surprise when I saw this a Channel 5 production.
Alan Moore. Fucking awesome...
That woman throwing holy Highland Spring everywhere, needs a Glasgow kiss, it’ll speed up her meeting with god.
I'm from the Highlands and I'm unimpressed and offended to find highland water used to such waste. Wankers
If anything, satire is used by people who think before they speak. If you don't think before you speak, you will be called out on it.
"satire is used by people who think before they speak" sorry, what? Satire is well constructed and a highly thought out process designed to criticise a given issue. How the hell is it anything like what you just said?
Nothing I said was inaccurate o_O
Yeah, sorry. I think I must have been really tired when I wrote that... for some reason I thought you wrote literally the opposite of what you said. weird.
I see... lol