I heard a story that before Christopher Hitchens died he asked to see a priest , and after a long and difficult conversation , he de-converted the priest to Atheism .
Over ten years later I find myself searching for every extant video of Christopher Hitchens. His valuable insightfulness is needed now more than ever I fear.
I just started to do the same thing with Christopher's interviews. I have been finding, at the ripe age of 50, that my understanding of his perspective has been enhanced. His clarity is remarkable.
An underrated aspect of this interview is Paxman’s unusually short and precise questioning. He doesn’t see the need to interrupt/challenge Hitchens. He - like the rest of us - understands the privilege of hearing this man’s last public words. RIP.
@@BloodSweatAndMethhe’s referring to what might be described as an area of this interview. It clearly wasn’t wasted on you because you clearly grasped it because of how utterly amazing you are. Indeed, you’re so amazing you took to the comments section to draw out that line of questioning hoping to engage debate around something that clearly wasn’t missed by you….. Perhaps you should write out even more comments about how great you are….. or save everyone time and just admit you’re a d1ckhead….
Erudite, educated, enlightened, experienced and above all eloquent! These are the hallmarks of greatness, and Hitch had it in spades. If there's a heaven, he's there, having been given a pass simply by what he stood for: rigorous in thought, passionate in belief, candor in speech, sincerity in all he questioned. Rest in peace, brother. When they made you, they broke the mould.
I am just a farmer....and always think the only significant differences between us and animals is that we use tools and can make fires....other than that I believe we believe our existence is way more relevant than it really is?
@@jonathonrobinson7236 Are you implying that you believe that Christopher did no good whilst on this planet and was a vile ,corrupt fool ? If so that's a very miscalculated,incriminating and naive statement.
Its naive when you don't see his true nature. John 8:44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Yet he died from throat cancer speaking against the holy God of the universe. Ironically. Your truth is you'll die and go to hell just like him if u don't repent and turn to Christ before its to late . He wouldn't have spend 5 minutes talking to u if he was alive. Your is dead quit worshipping men.
He wasn't necessarily a servant of truth. He also said many lies and spread inaccuracies (e.g. the nonsense that JFK ordered killing of the Diem family in Vietnam. A lie that Christopher repeated many times). I do miss him, but he was pretty overrated.
A very articulate man who held some good positions, and some bad positions. Like most intellectuals he wasn’t humble enough when challenged on some of his poorer choices/positions. On the subject of truth, God is the source of all Truth. There is only one absolute truth. And that is God. (In Islam one of his names/attributes is : Al-Haqq. The Truth.)
@@OmarMohamed-ed7kz ... Think you will learn through research that ALL Religions were infiltrated, including Islam ... Why would your Prophet marry a 6 year old girl and consummate the marriage when she was 9 years old, because he didn't. Aisha was at least 16 when she met the Prophet ... You see, there were members of the Ruling Elite in the inner circle of Advisers to Judaism, Christianity and Islam and it was those Advisers who perverted all Religions to suit the Agendas of Rome who were/are from the Ancient Aryan-Persian- Iranian Dynasty and they have ruled Earth for Milenia, they are NOT Italian but Persian. Any guesses why Biden, and Obama before him, sent Billions of $$$ to Iran .
So beautifully put, a great amongst intellectuals a worthy man, who lived a live of challenge, who challenged wrongs, and stood tall when all the lies and smoke had faded, i miss his brilliance. God bless him.
What an incredible man, and what incredible dignity and strength of character in the face of death. What a incredibly intelligent, insightful, and principled man - and what a powerful, important voice for reason and moral decency. Rest in peace, sir.
i actually liked the guy but jesus christ you sycophants make me want to vomit. i was searching for a recent interview with his brother (to be clear i like his brother much less as far as i can tell although hes never interested me enough to really find out definitively) and wound up here and dear god this is hitchens at his most tedious and pompous. the man is genuinely insufferable in this clip. to heap this kind of praise on him based on this interview is baffling to me. "battling cancer? why, i rather feel like its battling me!" or whatever he said. thats just completely inane semantic nonsense, which would be fine but he just insulted people for saying the inverse. ugh. alright i have to get off this clip reading all these sycophantic comments is darkening my mood very quickly
Listening to this man really makes me think about things in a different way, wish he was still with us. His search for truth and critical thinking will be his legacy.
I find an odd surge of strength and comfort in watching him during his last days. It makes me less anxious and stressed about how and when I will move on from this life. He not only fought until the end but also faced it head-on and without fear, but with tenacity. As we all should with this life we've been given.
I agree with this 100%. He is on my short list of 3 people I’ve never met, but who I actually mourn. And on this note, I’ve been going through my annual Hitchens phase recently, and truly became sad to think that in this era, with everything going on in the world, I don’t have his perspective. This culminated in my discovery that Hitchens’ own self-described “best friend” (although I’m sure he had many), Martin Amis, lived the closing years of his life literally 60 seconds away from my place of work. And on that realization, I felt a little bit closer to Hitchens’ universe.
He was an unapologetic socialist so he'd be 100% behind brexit. Given his well publicised contempt for all things Clinton he'd likely have seen Trump as the lesser evil but would be tearing him to shreds although not for the same reasons as those with TDS.
@@aidanmagill6769 He despised the Clinton's as a socialite family and a presidential candidates. But his contempt for Trump would have triumphed over anything, there is no way he would side with a person so averse to the principles he preaches, principles of reason, free thought, the advocacy of scientific research into fields of the unknown. Hitch would put aside his grievances of the Clinton's and would do anything to make sure someone as volatile and dangerous as Trump would never see the light of day in the white house. Sam Harris was actually asked about the question 'What would Hitch do' and shares the same sentiments.
@@aidanmagill6769 It is absolute nonsense that all socialists are behind Brexit. I will grant you that socialists may be divided on the issue, but many socialists see Brexit in terms of those leading and directing it and it's likely outcomes. The EU may have many flaws, but membership is infinitely preferable to allegiance to a Trump-led US, coordinated by the authors of Britannia Unchained and cheered on by the billionaire-owned press. Many people voting on the issue may not have realised that was the choice on offer, but it is very clear when you look at it closely. Being opposed to a thing does not make any alternative better - something that is as true of the EU as of Hilary Clinton.
@@aidanmagill6769 What nonsense. The Brexit program is being directed by the most right-wing government in recent UK history. Only someone who is determined to be wilfully ignorant could think that this will not shape how Brexit plays out. Opposing it hardly makes someone 'not a socialist'. My original post acknowledged that socialists are divided on the issue (as foolish as I think that is). It really is a case of the lesser of two evils. I am well aware that the EU has been used to push some highly objectionable policies; I just think that continued membership is better than giving Johnson, Raab, Patel etc free reign. Your argument is similar to those who supported Trump because Hilary was so awful. Of course she was awful - but you would have to have had one lobotomy too many not to see that Trump is far, far worse.
I found myself strangely moved by this interview. Wish I had followed him more and read more of his work while he was still alive. The whole world is so much poorer for his passing.
I agree, and there are many moments where you can tell that Paxman genuinely loves and admires Hitchens. There are moments where Paxman wanted to take the interview in a more philosophical or emotional direction, but most likely knew it would cross a line of respect to do so. It is a great interview... boy do we need Hitchens in this current political climate.
It was a great interview. This is only my second Paxman inerview, and I must say that I am impressed. The first one I saw he took the 'devil's advocate' pt of view against each person at the debate. cuts out the bs and gets right to the pt.
@@lwacc the fact that we have a human term (blasphemy) that describes the nature of how abominable religious beliefs are as an affront to the values of free speech is what should be considered pathetic. And you are pathetic to consider otherwise.
I'd never seen this interview but feel privileged to see such dignity and pragmatism in the face of such personal tragedy, I am deeply moved. Never seen Paxman show such deep respect for anyone! Any words I could muster would never do justice to Hitch, he truly deserves the title of being a great man. It would have been epic to see what he would have made of the utter insanity that now prevails in this very troubled world. What a tragic loss to humanity.
Paxman and Hitchens were clearly good friends, I detect a sadness and finality about their conversation. They like each other. Much respect and condolences.
Was looking for someone writing this comment to see if I weren't the only one instead of all the comments on him by people who can't seem to make the distinction between honest and uncivil discourse. They indeed seem to be close, and at least respectful towards eachother's professional and intellectual rigor.
@@stjames3852 I think he's a bit dumb to be honest, because God is important Like he's gonna look like a Muppet once he's resurrected and stood before God. Like it's not gonna pass just having an attitude about it on that day
The fact Hitchens was so well read that he actually knew what he was talking about and could uncover many of his critics as unread and ignorant.Also his other of many virtues is his logic and his ability to help us mere mortals understand what he was talking or writing about. He is greatly missed like a great friend who left this mortal coil before their time,more people like him are needed especially today to help us go forward into an uncertain future.
The only people who talk about "fighting" or "battling" cancer, are cancer charities, or parasites as I call them. Believe me, there is no battling or fighting where cancer's concerned, I'd say, "enduring" or at the end game "suffering".
@@tristramgordon8252 You call cancer charities parasites? If you ever get cancer, don't use any of the treatment that has been funded by cancer charities. Good luck.
Cancer is PROOF that there can be NO 'God'. Because if I'm wrong? that that would certainly make this so called 'God' THE biggest SADIST that EVER existed! (and prize TWAT too).
Only having discovered this hero posthumously, the vast filmed and written collection of his thoughts available will be more valuable to me as I learn from them. He seems to be a hugely underrated philosopher; his wisdom and legacy need to positively affect more people in this world.
Shane Stephen you are the deluded fool. Christopher Hitchens although not always right, offers another point of view not previously contemplated which is the very definition of a talented and intelligent philosopher. You my friend need to expand your horizons a touch.
I was very taken aback watching this. This is superb interview. He is very clear and collected with his ideas on thoughts of his impending demise. You can see how carefully he is weighing each and every one word to say exactly what it means. Great mind. One that is sorely missed.
Paxman can be a rather aggressive interviewer, even if only to play devil's advocate, a lot of people are made uncomfortable being interviewed by him because he has a way of undermining people who ride their own ego's. In most of his interviews Paxman is very much in control of the debate and in embarrassing the guests by pointing out inconsistencies and hypocrisies in their thoughts and/or actions. But the fact that Paxman can't get any leverage or wedge's in his [Hitchins'] thought process goes to show his control and mastery of rational thought. If nothing else, that should be justification for respect of his intellect. RIP.
I always need to come back and listen to Hitchens every once in a while, and his talk on how he viewed the end of his life and death in general is one of the most articulate, comforting & eloquent dialogues I've ever heard. An absolutely amazing orator.
I would very much love to see the look on his face when he died and stood before GOD, whether he believed or not is irrelevant. Even so it was his choice and as such he should be talked about with respect. I do not agree with a lot of what he said, "BUT" he was Brilliant, Articulate, Intelligent. The list goes on.
First time hearing of him and so glad I did! Today I watched a couple of his debate videos and I hope he gave the college students something to think about.
What I don't understand is when he harshly condemns the Vietnam war he is a hero but when he advocated the Iraq war that was 2× worse it's like it never happened.
A genuinely beautiful man and amazing orator. His outlook and words are moving to my soul. The world would be better to have you still here now brother x
I am 55yo man and not shy to say this interview makes me cry. This man..... we need him so much right now. My life was changed because of listening to him, I am so much happier and at peace because of him teaching me how to think.
I find it striking that proof exists about Jesus from unbiased sources outside of the Bible. Some of these writers have provided direct evidence of Christians, while others have provided indirect evidence of the existence of Jesus and of His crucifixion. The writings of these writers offer a peek into the current events taking place from the late first century to the late second century. I find difficulty in downplaying or explaining away these writers' writings on the account of the prestige and social position they held, and the disdain illustrated in some of their writing. Tacitus, The Greatest Roman historian, and senator Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. He then describes the torture of Christians: Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man’s cruelty, that they were being destroyed. Mara Bar-Serapion, He was a Syrian philosopher, who wrote a letter to his son sometime after AD 73. There is only one manuscript of his letter in existence and preserved in the British Museum. "What advantage did the Athenians gain from putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as a judgment for their crime. What advantage did the men of Samos gain from burning Pythagoras? In a moment their land was covered with sand. What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their wise King? It was just after that that their kingdom was abolished. God justly avenged these three wise men: the Athenians died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by the sea; the Jews, ruined and driven from their land, live in complete dispersion. But Socrates did not die for good; he lived on in the statue of Hera. Nor did the wise King die for good; he lived on in the teaching which he had given." Lucian, "The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day-the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. … You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains their contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property." Pliny the Younger, Is another valuable historical source for information on Jesus and the early Church. Pliny was the governor of the Roman province of Bithynia, located in Asia Minor. In the year 112 AD, he wrote to the Emperor Trajan, asking how he should deal with those in his region who have been accused of being Christians. In the letter, Pliny describes the practices of these “criminals”: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food-but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day. Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus, Was a Roman historian and court official during the reign of Emperor Hadrian. As the Jews were making constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus, he expelled them from Rome. Punishment by Nero was inflicted on the Christians, a class of men given to a new and mischievous superstition. Thallus, a secular historian Unreasonably of course, because a solar eclipse could not take place at the time of the full moon, and it was at the season of the Paschal full moon that Christ died. Phlegon of Tralles, was a Greek writer During the time of Tiberius Caesar, an eclipse of the sun occurred during the full moon". Julius Africanus, wrote around AD 221 He quotes Tallus' comments about the darkness that enveloped the land during the late afternoon hours when Jesus died on the cross: Tallus, in the third book of his histories. (Julius Africanus also quoting Phelgon of Tralles, Chronography, 18.1)
Have you wondered if there was any “proof” of the miracles of Jesus, outside the Bible (and outside of the writings of believers)? There are documents in which these writers provided us with evidence that Jesus worked miracles, but in writing, intended to downplay belief in such miracles. The first comes from the Babylonian Talmud 43a. Babylonian Talmud (late first or second century AD) Babylonian Sanhedrin43a-b “On the eve of the Passover they hanged Yeshu and the herald went before him for forty days saying [Yeshu] is going forth to be stoned in that he hate practiced sorcery and beguiled and led astray Israel. Here Jesus is accused of sorcery, in obvious parallel with the charge leveled in Matthew 12:22-23. The writer of the Talmud does not agree that Jesus worked bona fide miracles, but he reports that he did things which, to the enemy of Jesus could only be written off as sorcery. In the very early century AD Jewish literature, in "tHul 2:22-23" it is reported that healings were done in the name of Jesus. So we have indirect confirmation of the crucifixion of Jesus and of his working of public miracles-only charging that the miracles were worked by Satan, not God. Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day. Celsus was a Greek writer in the second century who criticized Christianity as a threat to the stable communities and worldview that the "pagan" religious and social system sought to uphold. His work as a whole has been lost, but when the third-century theologian Origen sought to answer Celsus' charges in a work appropriately called Against Celsus, he preserved most of Celsus' criticisms. Origen's replies are certainly worth reading in their own right, but the following excerpt is chosen in order to show how a thoughtful "pagan" viewed Christianity. [Celsus] accuses [Jesus] of having "invented his birth from a virgin," and upbraids Him with being "born in a certain Jewish village, of a poor woman of the country, who gained her subsistence by spinning, and who was turned out of doors by her husband, a carpenter by trade, because she was convicted of adultery; that after being driven away by her husband, and wandering about for a time, she disgracefully gave birth to Jesus, an illegitimate child, who having hired himself out as a servant in Egypt on account of his poverty, and having there acquired some miraculous powers, on which the Egyptians greatly pride themselves, returned to his own country, highly elated on account of them, and by means of these proclaimed himself a God."... The point I would make from this material in the Jewish Talmud from the late first century is that it proves that Jesus was a person they felt they had to deal with and that it was sufficiently common knowledge that he worked signs and wonders that they felt they had to address this by claiming that Jesus did his miracles by the power of Satan (sorcery). Does this “prove” that Jesus worked miracles? Maybe or maybe not. What it proves is that many in his day were convinced that he worked miracles and that his enemies were aware of sufficient positive evidence of this that they felt they needed to explain it. In summary, the request for “proof” in written documents that Jesus did in fact work miracles from non-believers is, logically, a very high bar indeed. We can assume that most of those who witnessed his miracles either came to believe in him or found ways to explain away what they saw. In fact, I believe that it is striking that we have these two documented examples of non-Christians feeling the need to explain what seems to have been common knowledge that there was much reason to believe Jesus worked miracles. This does indeed corroborate the accounts of miracles and wonders performed by Jesus in the Bible.
Why have I found this amazing man so late. I disagree with his politics but can’t stop listening to him. Mr Hitchens, please accept this as my posthumous letter to a life well lived. RIP sir
His politics were complex, and changed over the years. That's just another reason to respect him more. He was honest and humble enough to change his mind and admit it when he did, or if not change his mind, at least change his labels to some extent. Almost nobody ever does that.
I'm sorry my friend of your lack of discernment, Hitchens lacked wisdom and was a fool. Proverbs 9:10 10 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding. Proverbs 28:11 A rich man is wise in his own eyes, but a poor man with discernment sees through him. Psalm 10:4 In his pride the wicked man does not seek God; in all his schemes there is no God. Psalm 53:1 The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, and vile in their ways; there is no one who does good.
Jonathon Robinson Do you have an actual argument to put, or are you just reaching for the ad hominem and the quotation of documents whose significant is unagreed?
@@bikelawbloke Did not agree with the late Ch Hitch....but he was not a fool., ..as a believer I think there are good Catholic grounds for thinking he is in Heaven...and would definitely not say he was in Hell...the sort of man I would have liked to have a pint with!
I wish I had known about him sooner. I’ve been a closet atheist for about 20 years. His words have given me the courage to open up about my lack of belief. What a great man. ❤️
I grew up in the south and the fear of being disowned was strong. No one around me thought the way that I did/do so I felt like I had to stay quiet. I have since embraced it completely. ❤️
I watched this again today and it made me weep. Great men are in such short supply these days and I wish we still had his voice in the public discourse.
@@JeffreyGillespie how do you figure that, same genetics, same up bringing, same education, and in fact both used to have the same views. however i would love to hear the objective (and provable factual) reason for why Peter was the dumber brother
@@JeffreyGillespie not sure he isn't as smart in fact I think his world view is more accurate than Christopher, but Peter lacks the hubris and charm of Christopher
@@EugeneVerster Used to have being the operative words, and not because Christopher is dead. It was no secret they barley tolerated each other the last 10 years he was alive. With Peter having a much more conservative and directly religious views.
When i was 15, I came across Hitch, on RUclips. His rhetoric scared me like nothing else, because he was making sense. My Faith was shaken, and I was certain I would go to hell for being convinced. Thanks hitch, for planting the some well needed seeds of doubt.
@@jaysterling26 haha, yes. Luckily my parents aren't hyper religious just (very) religious, and we have learned to co exist with our very different beliefs.
It is just transparent honesty, the ultimate humility and compassion derives from speaking the truth, as you understand. Dignity implies the seeking of respect for ones being or image, Hitchens never did this.
@dagnut dignity is not about seeking anything fro another ie respect, it's more about humility and conduct. You're thinking of affirmation. You're right that Hitchens never did this of course!
So many people stumble through life begging the English language to express to the world their thoughts. This man commanded that language to bow to his will. It is no stretch to deem him a linguistic genius, and I cling to every word he speaks.
@@BiggieBig_ "Shut the fuck up" - not "shut the fuck up". Your grammar is as appalling as your dictatorial demand and wishful-thinking. N.B. Why did you delete your comment? Let me guess - embarrassment?
@@donthesitatebegin9283 are u really grammar policing on the internet😭u are not christoper hitchens, ur trying way too hard with unnecessary adjectives
"In case you are watching this, and you ever wondered whether to write to anyone, always do, because you’d be surprised by how much of a difference it can make.” - Christopher Hitchens 28:14 I couldn't agree more!
He will be very well catered for, as he has gone to meet his Maker and explain...."27 Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment" Hebrews 9:27 (ANIV)
@@baldieman64 LOL! He hasn't hurt me at all...only himself and his now futile destiny, as he will find out to his cost on Judgment Day! "49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth". Matthew 13:48-50 (KJV)
@@suurmoguuli2149 - I have listened to many of Christopher Hitchens' debates and although I profoundly disagree with many of his views; I like to think we "God lovers" (as he once described) would never be so ungenerous as to mock another of God's children.
I have seen many interviews until now, maybe less than a 60 yr old, but still enough, and this is one of the most emotional and courageous interview I have seen. He is a legend. He's a really really deep soul with an exceptional talent to convey it. Hats off, Rest in Peace, sir.
What a great man. So dignified. This should be listened to every so often. Grateful to have been introduced to me by my son. Thankful to BBC to have on RUclips -
Regrettably, I didn’t know of Hitchens whilst he was alive, but what a tremendous guy he was… I feel very fortunate that there are so many videos of him available to soak up and ponder, and this one is particularly powerful and poignant. Paxman’s clearly somewhat in awe and Hitchens’ eyes seem to tell a story in themselves. Lovely stuff.
@@MrArchie800 It's national socialist propaganda for "Modern audiences" ha, it's basis is lies and cherry picking of statistics to mislead people. Noway he would support it
Wow, the emotion at the end was so telling, the appreciation of the human word from others really got to him. Rest in peace Christopher. What an amazing man
Why would he rest in peace? Which is a religious statement given to those who lived for Christ faithfully and suffered the affliction of the world . Now whether you believe that or not, you cannot attribute that to this man. Neither would he wish to hear it from you.
He absolutely nailed how i would better describe my own experience of cancer. Not surprisingly for Christopher Hitchens, to be so eloquent. Thank you sir.
One of the best debater, orator, educator and author of our time. I wish he was still around today. He made a big impact to my life, miss him very much.
What is the best debater, orator, educator, and author of our time going to accomplish in the afterlife? This is what God says will happen to those who have rejected Jesus to follow satan, "Depart from Me, you workers of iniquity, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels". Mark 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
@@jonathonrobinson7236 He accomplished a lot during his informative life and that’s what matters the most! You believe in Jesus Christianity and hell and that’s your belief and obviously helps you with your life but this has no meaning or sense to me. Good luck to you in the afterlife though 😌
What a truly wonderful man. He will never know the true meaning he has offered to do so many and it is with regret that he’ll never know what his words have meant to me. Indeed, I can only wish his family my best wishes. What an incredible man. RIP
I discovered Hitch only a few years before his passing when I was a college student. I vividly recall spending hours in the computer lab completely entranced by his debate performances. I had never heard anyone challenge convention with such wit, humor, and brute force. It set a course for my worldview in those formative years. After all these years, I still haven’t quenched my thirst for Hitch’s intellect and insight. What an amazing man.
I really loved Christopher. I miss him and wish he was still here. He’s been widely beloved, admired and respected by people from every walk of life. As a person with an affinity for words I truly admire him beyond measure. There will never be another like him.
The world lost a truly magnificent man. An immeasurable lose to humanity, reason and intelligence. Hopefully he inspired many, many others to take up his baton. He'll be sorely missed.
He is being very well catered for, as he has gone to meet his Maker and explain...."27 Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment" Hebrews 9:27 (ANIV)
This is a remarkable interview. I think Paxman was close to tears at several points- Hitchens respected him enough to answer with a brutal honesty that I think surprised Paxman.
Seeing the world in the scopes of atheism is a scary realization and I've to commend all these smart intellectuals that publicly announce and defend it
I find it striking that proof exists about Jesus from unbiased sources outside of the Bible. Some of these writers have provided direct evidence of Christians, while others have provided indirect evidence of the existence of Jesus and of His crucifixion. The writings of these writers offer a peek into the current events taking place from the late first century to the late second century. I find difficulty in downplaying or explaining away these writers' writings on the account of the prestige and social position they held, and the disdain illustrated in some of their writing. Tacitus, The Greatest Roman historian, and senator Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. He then describes the torture of Christians: Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man’s cruelty, that they were being destroyed. Mara Bar-Serapion, He was a Syrian philosopher, who wrote a letter to his son sometime after AD 73. There is only one manuscript of his letter in existence and preserved in the British Museum. "What advantage did the Athenians gain from putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as a judgment for their crime. What advantage did the men of Samos gain from burning Pythagoras? In a moment their land was covered with sand. What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their wise King? It was just after that that their kingdom was abolished. God justly avenged these three wise men: the Athenians died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by the sea; the Jews, ruined and driven from their land, live in complete dispersion. But Socrates did not die for good; he lived on in the statue of Hera. Nor did the wise King die for good; he lived on in the teaching which he had given." Lucian, "The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day-the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. … You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains their contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property." Pliny the Younger, Is another valuable historical source for information on Jesus and the early Church. Pliny was the governor of the Roman province of Bithynia, located in Asia Minor. In the year 112 AD, he wrote to the Emperor Trajan, asking how he should deal with those in his region who have been accused of being Christians. In the letter, Pliny describes the practices of these “criminals”: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food-but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day. Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus, Was a Roman historian and court official during the reign of Emperor Hadrian. As the Jews were making constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus, he expelled them from Rome. Punishment by Nero was inflicted on the Christians, a class of men given to a new and mischievous superstition. Thallus, a secular historian Unreasonably of course, because a solar eclipse could not take place at the time of the full moon, and it was at the season of the Paschal full moon that Christ died. Phlegon of Tralles, was a Greek writer During the time of Tiberius Caesar, an eclipse of the sun occurred during the full moon". Julius Africanus, wrote around AD 221 He quotes Tallus' comments about the darkness that enveloped the land during the late afternoon hours when Jesus died on the cross: Tallus, in the third book of his histories. (Julius Africanus also quoting Phelgon of Tralles, Chronography, 18.1)
Have you wondered if there was any “proof” of the miracles of Jesus, outside the Bible (and outside of the writings of believers)? There are documents in which these writers provided us with evidence that Jesus worked miracles, but in writing, intended to downplay belief in such miracles. The first comes from the Babylonian Talmud 43a. Babylonian Talmud (late first or second century AD) Babylonian Sanhedrin43a-b “On the eve of the Passover they hanged Yeshu and the herald went before him for forty days saying [Yeshu] is going forth to be stoned in that he hate practiced sorcery and beguiled and led astray Israel. Here Jesus is accused of sorcery, in obvious parallel with the charge leveled in Matthew 12:22-23. The writer of the Talmud does not agree that Jesus worked bona fide miracles, but he reports that he did things which, to the enemy of Jesus could only be written off as sorcery. In the very early century AD Jewish literature, in "tHul 2:22-23" it is reported that healings were done in the name of Jesus. So we have indirect confirmation of the crucifixion of Jesus and of his working of public miracles-only charging that the miracles were worked by Satan, not God. Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day. Celsus was a Greek writer in the second century who criticized Christianity as a threat to the stable communities and worldview that the "pagan" religious and social system sought to uphold. His work as a whole has been lost, but when the third-century theologian Origen sought to answer Celsus' charges in a work appropriately called Against Celsus, he preserved most of Celsus' criticisms. Origen's replies are certainly worth reading in their own right, but the following excerpt is chosen in order to show how a thoughtful "pagan" viewed Christianity. [Celsus] accuses [Jesus] of having "invented his birth from a virgin," and upbraids Him with being "born in a certain Jewish village, of a poor woman of the country, who gained her subsistence by spinning, and who was turned out of doors by her husband, a carpenter by trade, because she was convicted of adultery; that after being driven away by her husband, and wandering about for a time, she disgracefully gave birth to Jesus, an illegitimate child, who having hired himself out as a servant in Egypt on account of his poverty, and having there acquired some miraculous powers, on which the Egyptians greatly pride themselves, returned to his own country, highly elated on account of them, and by means of these proclaimed himself a God."... The point I would make from this material in the Jewish Talmud from the late first century is that it proves that Jesus was a person they felt they had to deal with and that it was sufficiently common knowledge that he worked signs and wonders that they felt they had to address this by claiming that Jesus did his miracles by the power of Satan (sorcery). Does this “prove” that Jesus worked miracles? Maybe or maybe not. What it proves is that many in his day were convinced that he worked miracles and that his enemies were aware of sufficient positive evidence of this that they felt they needed to explain it. In summary, the request for “proof” in written documents that Jesus did in fact work miracles from non-believers is, logically, a very high bar indeed. We can assume that most of those who witnessed his miracles either came to believe in him or found ways to explain away what they saw. In fact, I believe that it is striking that we have these two documented examples of non-Christians feeling the need to explain what seems to have been common knowledge that there was much reason to believe Jesus worked miracles. This does indeed corroborate the accounts of miracles and wonders performed by Jesus in the Bible.
Having only discovered this amazing man in the last year all I have to say is he should be compulsory teaching at every university. A truest great man.
@@2msvalkyrie529 Oh no, you could of said, the Modern mans Bertrand Russell but even then, two very different people and there was nothing poor or sub par about Hitch.
Just" discovered" him last week and find him so compelling. As with many, I wish I had been aware of him much, much earlier. Even more so, how I wish he was still alive..the world needs minds and communication like Christopher.
I found him after his passing and 7 years after watching my first video I still find content I've not seen. Welcome to an awesome learning journey. His debates are better as you can learn both sides of the argument .
I met him. He was awesome in person... feet away... at the podium at a humanist conference in 2008. He had a mastery of words that thrilled and delighted me. And still do. I'm so sorry we lost him.
I’m still so sad he’s no longer here. I wish I’d written to him when I had the chance and I promise it wouldn’t have been to cheer him up. It would have been sincere appreciation for his impact.
@@matt.willoughby i don't know about writing to the brother. but his son is a university lecturer dealing with radicalization. I would rather write to him. look him up.
Christopher Hitchens has been such a huge inspiration in my life; what a man? I return to this interview often because it is such a candid meeting that could only be carried out by two men who clearly have enormous respect for one and other .
What part inspired you the most his depression his addictions his stupidity for killing himself ? His arrogance ? His utter contempt for anyone who disagreed with him ? I’d like to know . Thank you
He seems vaguely terrified and evasive, at least to me. He answers direct questions with rambling statements that sometimes lack coherence. Like belittling cancer as just another ailment like polio or smallpox, suggesting terror of these diseases is somehow irrational or "superstitious." Or incoherent, strange musings comparing having cancer to a woman being pregnant, hosting another organism inside one's body. That's at best a completely bizarre comparison. He thinks and hopes there is some kind of genuine philosophical insight there (i.e., as if cancer is an opportunity to learn about pregnancy, and possibly be more empathic to women and the burdens of bearing children), but the analogy is just to weak for these half-baked ponderings to go anywhere, and he's repeatedly just forced back on himself as an avowed atheist dying of cancer at a young age, whose physical appearance even before getting the illness implies he was living a decadently indulgent life, probably abusing liquor, food or other dangerous indulgences. I say all this not to rant sanctimoniously, but to say he looks like he might be worrying about a debt coming due, after defying and taunting the collector. That's just sort of the vibe he gives off.
@@brettpritchard265 thanks; I hate that it sounded or seemed nasty; and it’s not a sanctimonious, religiously driven kind of “here you see the decadent, libertine heathen getting his just dessert” type of rant, though it may seem that way. I’m deeply sympathetic to a great deal of what Mr. Hitchens says, particularly his heroically and eloquently calling out the Catholic Church on all the heinous abuses and hypocrisy. It’s just that as a supposed champion of science and rationality, he seems extremely passion-driven and appetite-driven, to an obviously self-destructive fault, and this may well discredit some of his arguments. It often appears, in this sense, that he is no more rational and scientific than his opponents, particular when he rants this way about cancer and dying: the things he says seem to come from fantasy and sophistry no less than the sophistries and fantastical thinking he accuses the Church of. And my impression is there may be an underlying fear (warranted or not), that his health condition could in fact be a divine comeuppance for his behavior. I definitely don’t want that to be nasty. You know what they say by the way: there’s no such thing as an atheist in a foxhole. Do soldiers facing mortal danger retreat into childish fear-driven, religious fantasy? Or is a genuine insight awakened in those conditions? Thank G-d, I’ve never been there, or in Mr. Hitchens’ health predicament, but maybe instead of atheism a better stance would be a more modest agnosticism, if one does not find genuine religious faith compelling or tenable. To be an outspoken practically militant atheist probably triggers some self-questioning in many who find themselves battling cancer at a young age or thrown into a foxhole. Btw: I recommend the movie “Indigination” or the Phillip Roth novel it’s based on (admitting to only read maybe a third of it; perhaps I’ll take it up again): it’s all about a self-proclaimed atheist’s finding himself in a position of severe moral culpability and confronting that punishment may not be some childish fantasy. The movie (or book presumably) seems to be saying that religious claims about divine or cosmic punishment and reward may be true, they may be false-- but life events compel us to consider the moral consequences of our actions which could be viewed in naturalistic of supernatural terms, and each person has to ultimately weigh what kinds of risks are worth taking; and it’s very possible that in a foxhole (or battling cancer), earlier swagger or confidence might find itself challenged by self-doubt.
The Aspergian Heteroclite You’re incapable of knowing (as is everyone) if he’s wrong about the existence of God, but it’s impossible to argue that he’s mistaken about religion.
I didn’t know who this man was. A RUclips recommendation and I have been hypnotised from beginning to end, superb. His way of thinking from death/dying and regret have definitely provoked me into deep though, thank you! I will certainly check out his literary works :)
He has a twin brother, Peter, who's still going. Though unlike Christopher who was a socialist, Peter has conservative views, still recommend you check him out too.
Bless you. I know what you mean. He understood what it means to stick to one's principles, and debate always from that point. He was true to himself in every moment and I wish I could have been like that. I miss him desperately.
I love the way he describes his "fight" with cancer. Im going through treatments and that is exactly how i feel. I am not "battling" or "fighting" i am *enduring*. It is my doctors that are doing the fighting.
@@Nobodieslistening123 But your not. Your not preaching in kind like Jesus did, your not seeking to ferry these people through expert and kind education. Your just being a “keyboard” warrior online to make yourself feel better about your “lack of damnation” ultimately god being an all seeing being would know this as well. I’d go so far to say, I bet your god thinks you’re a waste.
Having watched this interview a number of times I never ceased to be moved by Christopher’s philosophic acceptance of an ending of this life combined with his belief there was nothing more to follow, tempered with a subtle sense of cynical humour which must have sustained him to the end. How badly this world needs him now. Thank you Hitch.
I wouldn't put all my marbles in a bag with Hitchens because he was a slave to blasphemy. He blasphemed the name of God at every opportunity. None of you followers of Hitchens bothered to ask the big question. What was Hitchens's agenda? Hitchens followers don't realize that they have fallen prey and become haters of God and parrots, also blaspheming the name of God. I invite you to read the Word of God: John 8:34 Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin. Romans 6:16 Do you not know that when you offer yourselves as obedient slaves, you are slaves to the one you obey, whether you are slaves to sin leading to death, or to obedience leading to righteousness? 2 Peter 2:19 They promise freedom, but they themselves are slaves of sin and corruption. For you are a slave to whatever controls you. My friends, it's evident what controlled Hitchens, you must decide what will control yourselves, whether it's sin or righteousness?
Christopher It’s been such a pleasure to hear your debates. I’m an Englishman and I’m always amazed by the vocabulary and your intellect. Shame we lost you
A touching and emotional ending to another wonderful set of comments from Mr. Hitchens. Compliments to the interviewer who was able to draw Mr. Hitchens out in a way other interviewers could not.
I wouldn't put all my marbles in a bag with Hitchens because he was a slave to blasphemy. He blasphemed the name of God at every opportunity. None of you followers of Hitchens bothered to ask the big question. What was Hitchens's agenda? Hitchens followers don't realize that they have fallen prey and become haters of God and parrots, also blaspheming the name of God. I invite you to read the Word of God: John 8:34 Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin. Romans 6:16 Do you not know that when you offer yourselves as obedient slaves, you are slaves to the one you obey, whether you are slaves to sin leading to death, or to obedience leading to righteousness? 2 Peter 2:19 They promise freedom, but they themselves are slaves of sin and corruption. For you are a slave to whatever controls you. My friends, it's evident what controlled Hitchens, you must decide what will control yourselves, whether it's sin or righteousness?
@@thomasowens5824 My friend, this is the perfect place and to the perfect people. God wants to save the lost souls or He wouldn't have given His Son as a sacrifice for our sins. Repent from your sins and trust and believe in the Lord Jesus as your Saviour.
@@jonathonrobinson7236 Your logic is so messed up its laughable. Shame that the Jesus you have no evidence for, didn't take the oportunity to correct the corrupt repugnant scriptures, he could have easily declared Slavery is bad and the laws in the old testament are wrong, but he didn't, so he is morally corrupt as god was. Your god is a mass slaughtering narcissist, IF he actually existed he would have a lot of explaining to do, but a god that does not interact with reality is indistinguishable from a god that does not exist. You have bought into a book of fairytales written by the church to control Iron age peasants.....you have sacrificed morals, logic and critical thinking on the crooked alter of religion, no sir, this place is not for you.
I heard a story that before Christopher Hitchens died he asked to see a priest , and after a long and difficult conversation , he de-converted the priest to Atheism .
Edrei Argueta Lmao
Edrei Argueta Absolutely fabulous and very clever joke indeed.
It gave me a good giggle that lol!
Haha same! Hitch would have liked that one! He left us in some ways but his afterlife is eternal in his books and these recordings
Edrei Argueta , you made my day!
Similar to Voltaire
Over ten years later I find myself searching for every extant video of Christopher Hitchens. His valuable insightfulness is needed now more than ever I fear.
Agreed
I just started to do the same thing with Christopher's interviews. I have been finding, at the ripe age of 50, that my understanding of his perspective has been enhanced. His clarity is remarkable.
Same
Especially now.
Instead of searching for videos, you should be buying and reading his books :)
An underrated aspect of this interview is Paxman’s unusually short and precise questioning. He doesn’t see the need to interrupt/challenge Hitchens. He - like the rest of us - understands the privilege of hearing this man’s last public words. RIP.
@@BloodSweatAndMeth whom
Well it's not really a conversation that calls for debate, which is generally what paxman does
@@BloodSweatAndMethhe’s referring to what might be described as an area of this interview.
It clearly wasn’t wasted on you because you clearly grasped it because of how utterly amazing you are.
Indeed, you’re so amazing you took to the comments section to draw out that line of questioning hoping to engage debate around something that clearly wasn’t missed by you…..
Perhaps you should write out even more comments about how great you are….. or save everyone time and just admit you’re a d1ckhead….
It's a good interviewer who can shut up and listen rather than trying to rush through their questions.
Well said and noticed.
Erudite, educated, enlightened, experienced and above all eloquent! These are the hallmarks of greatness, and Hitch had it in spades. If there's a heaven, he's there, having been given a pass simply by what he stood for: rigorous in thought, passionate in belief, candor in speech, sincerity in all he questioned. Rest in peace, brother. When they made you, they broke the mould.
indeed..😊
Well said.
ethical?
"We should not mourn that such men died, rather we should rejoice that such men ever lived" - George Patton
i think the thing is to remember the salient messages ... but we have had messages defining humanity and calling out slavery etc ... yet they endure
Of course 🔚
Great comment. Thanks for the quote. I'll definitely use that in the future.
he was not so clever 😂😂😂
good message, just want to mention Patton was a devout Christian...
What an intelligent, articulate and dignified man. The world truly suffered from losing him.
@blake bishop can we ask why you feel like that toward him?
blake bishop - I think you are only angry because he made fun of your imaginary friend.
@blake bishop "Where the money was"??? You are the champion of the paraolympic games.
@blake bishop facts please....not just your opinion......he's only speaking the truth.
mistercheez aAżqqqżqqżxqqqqqqqq
One of the most articulate & intelligent men to have lived on this bizarre planet.
I am just a farmer....and always think the only significant differences between us and animals is that we use tools and can make fires....other than that I believe we believe our existence is way more relevant than it really is?
Rubbish!
Psalm 53:1
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, and vile in their ways; there is no one who does good.
@@jonathonrobinson7236 Are you implying that you believe that Christopher did no good whilst on this planet and was a vile ,corrupt fool ? If so that's a very miscalculated,incriminating and naive statement.
Its naive when you don't see his true nature.
John 8:44
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Not a servant of God but a servant of truth. His truth was my truth and I miss that he is no longer with us. We were lucky to have him.
Yet he died from throat cancer speaking against the holy God of the universe. Ironically. Your truth is you'll die and go to hell just like him if u don't repent and turn to Christ before its to late . He wouldn't have spend 5 minutes talking to u if he was alive. Your is dead quit worshipping men.
He wasn't necessarily a servant of truth. He also said many lies and spread inaccuracies (e.g. the nonsense that JFK ordered killing of the Diem family in Vietnam. A lie that Christopher repeated many times). I do miss him, but he was pretty overrated.
@@sdkfz2519
Do not show fake love.
You can detest him, hate him but do not say you liked him and yet project such atrocities.
A very articulate man who held some good positions, and some bad positions. Like most intellectuals he wasn’t humble enough when challenged on some of his poorer choices/positions.
On the subject of truth, God is the source of all Truth. There is only one absolute truth. And that is God. (In Islam one of his names/attributes is : Al-Haqq. The Truth.)
@@OmarMohamed-ed7kz ... Think you will learn through research that ALL Religions were infiltrated, including Islam ...
Why would your Prophet marry a 6 year old girl and consummate the marriage when she was 9 years old, because he didn't. Aisha was at least 16 when she met the Prophet ...
You see, there were members of the Ruling Elite in the inner circle of Advisers to Judaism, Christianity and Islam and it was those Advisers who perverted all Religions to suit the Agendas of Rome who were/are from the Ancient Aryan-Persian- Iranian Dynasty and they have ruled Earth for Milenia, they are NOT Italian but Persian.
Any guesses why Biden, and Obama before him, sent Billions of $$$ to Iran .
I can listen to Christopher Hitchens talk all day. He speaks so eloquently and beautifully.
A brave man sharing his thoughts at the end and beautifully addressed by Paxman. How could anybody not be moved?
You can Paxman was in awe, and rightly so
So beautifully put, a great amongst intellectuals a worthy man, who lived a live of challenge, who challenged wrongs, and stood tall when all the lies and smoke had faded, i miss his brilliance. God bless him.
Its called a british accent
@@btewb
Not just any British accent .Ha certainly not Cockney , Scouse or Geordie accent !
What an incredible man, and what incredible dignity and strength of character in the face of death. What a incredibly intelligent, insightful, and principled man - and what a powerful, important voice for reason and moral decency. Rest in peace, sir.
Hear hear. What a beautiful mind to at least listen to in retrospect. I wonder what he would make of the world today.
i actually liked the guy but jesus christ you sycophants make me want to vomit.
i was searching for a recent interview with his brother (to be clear i like his brother much less as far as i can tell although hes never interested me enough to really find out definitively) and wound up here and dear god this is hitchens at his most tedious and pompous. the man is genuinely insufferable in this clip. to heap this kind of praise on him based on this interview is baffling to me. "battling cancer? why, i rather feel like its battling me!" or whatever he said. thats just completely inane semantic nonsense, which would be fine but he just insulted people for saying the inverse. ugh. alright i have to get off this clip reading all these sycophantic comments is darkening my mood very quickly
I have cancer ,operated and currently in remission. 3 years so far. Your thoughts and descriptions of this disease have helped me deal with it
Much luck to you brother. May you live many many more years in good health.
That's great you're doing well - hope you continue to have an awesome, illness free life 😊
All the best Hudson
I hope you get through it and beat it, always eat healthy and stay hydrated and stay away from toxic people. Hope the best for you!
Read the book mortality by Hitchens it is really beautiful ! And I hope for u to get cured .
Listening to this man really makes me think about things in a different way, wish he was still with us. His search for truth and critical thinking will be his legacy.
When I hear Christopher Hitchens speak It makes me miss him and feel sad. Great human being.
Christopher*
Mizrob Abdukholikov Its Christopher
masonmmaspecilist Sorry my bad.
BLOODY IDIOT.
You have exposed yourself as such.
A man of considerable integrity and honesty
I find an odd surge of strength and comfort in watching him during his last days. It makes me less anxious and stressed about how and when I will move on from this life. He not only fought until the end but also faced it head-on and without fear, but with tenacity. As we all should with this life we've been given.
He is one of my great heroes
Sadly Christopher died before the abomination in America of Trump, just would love to hear his thoughts on American politics today
@@richardwait1206 He would not be impressed with the far left activism, riots, and sympathy with Islamic jihad.
Christopher Hitchens is a person I never physically Met, Yet he is one of the few people I miss the most.
I agree with this 100%.
He is on my short list of 3 people I’ve never met, but who I actually mourn.
And on this note, I’ve been going through my annual Hitchens phase recently, and truly became sad to think that in this era, with everything going on in the world, I don’t have his perspective.
This culminated in my discovery that Hitchens’ own self-described “best friend” (although I’m sure he had many), Martin Amis, lived the closing years of his life literally 60 seconds away from my place of work.
And on that realization, I felt a little bit closer to Hitchens’ universe.
Hitchens and George Carlin
People like him inspire you to fearlessly speak out against the rampant bullshit out there. We miss him because we miss that part of us in ourselves.
Hitchens continues to enlighten. We owe him so much. Thank you Christopher.
Pre Trump, pre Brexit oh to hear him speak on these matters.
He was an unapologetic socialist so he'd be 100% behind brexit. Given his well publicised contempt for all things Clinton he'd likely have seen Trump as the lesser evil but would be tearing him to shreds although not for the same reasons as those with TDS.
@@aidanmagill6769 He despised the Clinton's as a socialite family and a presidential candidates. But his contempt for Trump would have triumphed over anything, there is no way he would side with a person so averse to the principles he preaches, principles of reason, free thought, the advocacy of scientific research into fields of the unknown. Hitch would put aside his grievances of the Clinton's and would do anything to make sure someone as volatile and dangerous as Trump would never see the light of day in the white house. Sam Harris was actually asked about the question 'What would Hitch do' and shares the same sentiments.
@@aidanmagill6769 It is absolute nonsense that all socialists are behind Brexit. I will grant you that socialists may be divided on the issue, but many socialists see Brexit in terms of those leading and directing it and it's likely outcomes. The EU may have many flaws, but membership is infinitely preferable to allegiance to a Trump-led US, coordinated by the authors of Britannia Unchained and cheered on by the billionaire-owned press. Many people voting on the issue may not have realised that was the choice on offer, but it is very clear when you look at it closely. Being opposed to a thing does not make any alternative better - something that is as true of the EU as of Hilary Clinton.
@@smritivipin not really socialists then, are they?
@@aidanmagill6769 What nonsense. The Brexit program is being directed by the most right-wing government in recent UK history. Only someone who is determined to be wilfully ignorant could think that this will not shape how Brexit plays out. Opposing it hardly makes someone 'not a socialist'. My original post acknowledged that socialists are divided on the issue (as foolish as I think that is). It really is a case of the lesser of two evils. I am well aware that the EU has been used to push some highly objectionable policies; I just think that continued membership is better than giving Johnson, Raab, Patel etc free reign. Your argument is similar to those who supported Trump because Hilary was so awful. Of course she was awful - but you would have to have had one lobotomy too many not to see that Trump is far, far worse.
I found myself strangely moved by this interview. Wish I had followed him more and read more of his work while he was still alive. The whole world is so much poorer for his passing.
An honest man who simply sought the truth about a lot of important matters.
This interview is one of Paxman's finest pieces of work. I'm not usually of fan of him, but he does this well.
to be fair, he had an outstanding interviewee. but i agree, paxman conducted this well.
I agree, and there are many moments where you can tell that Paxman genuinely loves and admires Hitchens. There are moments where Paxman wanted to take the interview in a more philosophical or emotional direction, but most likely knew it would cross a line of respect to do so. It is a great interview... boy do we need Hitchens in this current political climate.
Totally agree, it is an excellent interview.
He was in awe, this is how honest and respectful people engage
It was a great interview. This is only my second Paxman inerview, and I must say that I am impressed.
The first one I saw he took the 'devil's advocate' pt of view against each person at the debate. cuts out the bs and gets right to the pt.
I think one of the most touching things here is Paxman's unexpected tenderness.
Absolutely.
He ain't got much choice, the man was dying 🤔
@@shaun5944 I've seen the interview where Paxo interviewed Maurice Duvalier. He was dying too and Paxo tore into him .
@@mchristhomas do you have a link?
@@dertdood yes
'I've used many other organs to blaspheme as well' - what a fucking legend
@@lwacc are you actually that dense?
@@lwacc I think we’re all wondering what yours is.
I suppose, if blasphemy makes one a legend
Look up cross examined
@@lwacc the fact that we have a human term (blasphemy) that describes the nature of how abominable religious beliefs are as an affront to the values of free speech is what should be considered pathetic. And you are pathetic to consider otherwise.
I'd never seen this interview but feel privileged to see such dignity and pragmatism in the face of such personal tragedy, I am deeply moved. Never seen Paxman show such deep respect for anyone! Any words I could muster would never do justice to Hitch, he truly deserves the title of being a great man. It would have been epic to see what he would have made of the utter insanity that now prevails in this very troubled world. What a tragic loss to humanity.
Two brilliant men certainly.
Yes. I would love to hear what Hitch and George Carlin would have to say about the nonsense in philosophy, culture and religion today.
"born into a losing struggle" The great man sums it up so brilliantly.
Buddhist belief in a nut shell
Unbelievably touching to see Paxman quite clearly showing some emotion right at the end of the interview.
@Kaian凯安 You can see a tear in Hitchen's eye. He's missed
Paxman and Hitchens were clearly good friends, I detect a sadness and finality about their conversation. They like each other. Much respect and condolences.
Was looking for someone writing this comment to see if I weren't the only one instead of all the comments on him by people who can't seem to make the distinction between honest and uncivil discourse. They indeed seem to be close, and at least respectful towards eachother's professional and intellectual rigor.
Sounded to me like Paxman is actually quite religious compared to him
@@marioluigi9599 doesn’t mean they couldn’t be friends :)
@@stjames3852 I think he's a bit dumb to be honest, because God is important
Like he's gonna look like a Muppet once he's resurrected and stood before God. Like it's not gonna pass just having an attitude about it on that day
Yes, I think you’re right James Stuart. The looks they exchanged near the end were very heartfelt, I think.
The fact Hitchens was so well read that he actually knew what he was talking about and could uncover many of his critics as unread and ignorant.Also his other of many virtues is his logic and his ability to help us mere mortals understand what he was talking or writing about.
He is greatly missed like a great friend who left this mortal coil before their time,more people like him are needed especially today to help us go forward into an uncertain future.
He articulated everything I feel but would never have known, or can ever express. Brilliant, brilliant man. I'm thankful for his time here.x
"I think I prefer resistance to battling. I didn't pick this fight, but now I am in it."
Never fails to astonish me.
The only people who talk about "fighting" or "battling" cancer, are cancer charities, or parasites as I call them. Believe me, there is no battling or fighting where cancer's concerned, I'd say, "enduring" or at the end game "suffering".
@@tristramgordon8252 You call cancer charities parasites?
If you ever get cancer, don't use any of the treatment that has been funded by cancer charities. Good luck.
Doug Miles, so it's a guarantee if you smoke and are an alcoholic, you get cancer? Is that right, Doctor????
Cancer is PROOF that there can be NO 'God'. Because if I'm wrong? that that would certainly make this so called 'God' THE biggest SADIST that EVER existed! (and prize TWAT too).
It reminds me of his support for the Palestinians and their resistance. The same sentiment can be applied to their plight.
I hope I face my death with such courage.
K Nicole true legend
Shane Stephen If God makes people act like you're acting, you can keep him
Shane Stephen ''get real man'' says the one believing in magic
@Vote Little Win Big
There is God and there is life after death
@@orlansmith6230 thanks for the clear guidance, and your evidence is?
his command of the English language is just brilliant!
almost as good as rowan williams !
Dom Cox hahaha very good joke
He was a master.
Hossam ElGebeily Oh! Spine tingling.
Absolutely! I continually try to expand my vocabulary and when u listen to Hitchens, it's a totally inspiring experience in the art of discussion.
A great human being. If more people had his insight, a lot of the troubles we experience could be overcome.
And a sad alcoholic. Certainly not a role-model for happiness but certainly intellectually stimulating.
@@MS-fg8qoan untroubled intellect is a simp..
Be well!! 🙂
Only having discovered this hero posthumously, the vast filmed and written collection of his thoughts available will be more valuable to me as I learn from them. He seems to be a hugely underrated philosopher; his wisdom and legacy need to positively affect more people in this world.
DontTouchTheWatch he is a philosopher in most ways but calling him an intellectual works too
I cried when he finally passed, he'd been the voice of reason for me and still is
James M the nh
You should look for Bertrand Russell also. Hitch and him were two peas in a pod.
Shane Stephen you are the deluded fool. Christopher Hitchens although not always right, offers another point of view not previously contemplated which is the very definition of a talented and intelligent philosopher. You my friend need to expand your horizons a touch.
I was very taken aback watching this. This is superb interview. He is very clear and collected with his ideas on thoughts of his impending demise. You can see how carefully he is weighing each and every one word to say exactly what it means. Great mind. One that is sorely missed.
Paxman can be a rather aggressive interviewer, even if only to play devil's advocate, a lot of people are made uncomfortable being interviewed by him because he has a way of undermining people who ride their own ego's. In most of his interviews Paxman is very much in control of the debate and in embarrassing the guests by pointing out inconsistencies and hypocrisies in their thoughts and/or actions. But the fact that Paxman can't get any leverage or wedge's in his [Hitchins'] thought process goes to show his control and mastery of rational thought. If nothing else, that should be justification for respect of his intellect.
RIP.
I just cannot bear it that he is not here when the world is so desperately in need of his deep intellect and insight. RIP.
Jeez that is pathetic.
The reason we became the dominant species is because we learned to share knowledge.
He would hate this kind of simpering attitude, believe me.
We are always in need of it, which is why it’s best to try to create it ourselves.
Me too x
I watched this extraordinary man give this interview many times over the years and he/it still moves and inspires me every single time.
Great interview by Paxman, still asking the awkward and hard questions but yet showing the respect that Hitch well and truly deserves at this point
“At this point”
At that point**
HE always deserves respect!
@@colin-campbell both, unfortunately....
I always need to come back and listen to Hitchens every once in a while, and his talk on how he viewed the end of his life and death in general is one of the most articulate, comforting & eloquent dialogues I've ever heard. An absolutely amazing orator.
Amen! He keeps me sane.
Lewis Murphy@ I too listen to his talks, debates, arguments... frequently. He uplifts my spirits immeasurably!
I would very much love to see the look on his face when he died and stood before GOD, whether he believed or not is irrelevant. Even so it was his choice and as such he should be talked about with respect. I do not agree with a lot of what he said, "BUT" he was Brilliant, Articulate, Intelligent. The list goes on.
I do exactly the same. Well said.
@@Faith-Ministries stood before what God?
Never get tired of listening to this legend. Years later people are still hearing his message.
Agreed. Recommend his writing. That is the real gold!
I only just learned of him (2022!) and I’m so glad.
First time hearing of him and so glad I did! Today I watched a couple of his debate videos and I hope he gave the college students something to think about.
@@gordonross784 aman to emulate the depth and breadth of his knowledge was awesome.
What I don't understand is when he harshly condemns the Vietnam war he is a hero but when he advocated the Iraq war that was 2× worse it's like it never happened.
Hitchens was such a titan for truth. Miss him very much. Preachers could not help but like him. Christopher gave so much to his readers.
A genuinely beautiful man and amazing orator. His outlook and words are moving to my soul. The world would be better to have you still here now brother x
He admits that he doesn't know it all. None of us do. I think it's called humility.
It's called wilfull ignorance in this case .
@@Patrick-hb7bk wait, admitting to not know everything is willful ignorance? who is there that knows everything... and please don't say god
I am 55yo man and not shy to say this interview makes me cry. This man..... we need him so much right now. My life was changed because of listening to him, I am so much happier and at peace because of him teaching me how to think.
I have been impacted by him as well. Even as a teenager, I loved how he stood up to people.
I find it striking that proof exists about Jesus from unbiased sources outside of the Bible. Some of these writers have provided direct evidence of Christians, while others have provided indirect evidence of the existence of Jesus and of His crucifixion. The writings of these writers offer a peek into the current events taking place from the late first century to the late second century. I find difficulty in downplaying or explaining away these writers' writings on the account of the prestige and social position they held, and the disdain illustrated in some of their writing.
Tacitus, The Greatest Roman historian, and senator
Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind.
He then describes the torture of Christians:
Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man’s cruelty, that they were being destroyed.
Mara Bar-Serapion,
He was a Syrian philosopher, who wrote a letter to his son sometime after AD 73. There is only one manuscript of his letter in existence and preserved in the British Museum.
"What advantage did the Athenians gain from putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as a judgment for their crime. What advantage did the men of Samos gain from burning Pythagoras? In a moment their land was covered with sand. What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their wise King? It was just after that that their kingdom was abolished. God justly avenged these three wise men: the Athenians died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by the sea; the Jews, ruined and driven from their land, live in complete dispersion. But Socrates did not die for good; he lived on in the statue of Hera. Nor did the wise King die for good; he lived on in the teaching which he had given."
Lucian,
"The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day-the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. … You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains their contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property."
Pliny the Younger,
Is another valuable historical source for information on Jesus and the early Church. Pliny was the governor of the Roman province of Bithynia, located in Asia Minor. In the year 112 AD, he wrote to the Emperor Trajan, asking how he should deal with those in his region who have been accused of being Christians.
In the letter, Pliny describes the practices of these “criminals”:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food-but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian
Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.
Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus,
Was a Roman historian and court official during the reign of Emperor Hadrian.
As the Jews were making constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus, he expelled them from Rome. Punishment by Nero was inflicted on the Christians, a class of men given to a new and mischievous superstition.
Thallus, a secular historian
Unreasonably of course, because a solar eclipse could not take place at the time of the full moon, and it was at the season of the Paschal full moon that Christ died.
Phlegon of Tralles, was a Greek writer
During the time of Tiberius Caesar, an eclipse of the sun occurred during the full moon".
Julius Africanus, wrote around AD 221
He quotes Tallus' comments about the darkness that enveloped the land during the late afternoon hours when Jesus died on the cross: Tallus, in the third book of his histories.
(Julius Africanus also quoting Phelgon of Tralles, Chronography, 18.1)
Have you wondered if there was any “proof” of the miracles of Jesus, outside the Bible (and outside of the writings of believers)? There are documents in which these writers provided us with evidence that Jesus worked miracles, but in writing, intended to downplay belief in such miracles.
The first comes from the Babylonian Talmud 43a. Babylonian Talmud (late first or second century AD) Babylonian Sanhedrin43a-b “On the eve of the Passover they hanged Yeshu and the herald went before him for forty days saying [Yeshu] is going forth to be stoned in that he hate practiced sorcery and beguiled and led astray Israel.
Here Jesus is accused of sorcery, in obvious parallel with the charge leveled in Matthew 12:22-23. The writer of the Talmud does not agree that Jesus worked bona fide miracles, but he reports that he did things which, to the enemy of Jesus could only be written off as sorcery.
In the very early century AD Jewish literature, in "tHul 2:22-23" it is reported that healings were done in the name of Jesus. So we have indirect confirmation of the crucifixion of Jesus and of his working of public miracles-only charging that the miracles were worked by Satan, not God.
Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian
Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.
Celsus was a Greek writer in the second century who criticized Christianity as a threat to the stable communities and worldview that the "pagan" religious and social system sought to uphold. His work as a whole has been lost, but when the third-century theologian Origen sought to answer Celsus' charges in a work appropriately called Against Celsus, he preserved most of Celsus' criticisms. Origen's replies are certainly worth reading in their own right, but the following excerpt is chosen in order to show how a thoughtful "pagan" viewed Christianity.
[Celsus] accuses [Jesus] of having "invented his birth from a virgin," and upbraids Him with being "born in a certain Jewish village, of a poor woman of the country, who gained her subsistence by spinning, and who was turned out of doors by her husband, a carpenter by trade, because she was convicted of adultery; that after being driven away by her husband, and wandering about for a time, she disgracefully gave birth to Jesus, an illegitimate child, who having hired himself out as a servant in Egypt on account of his poverty, and having there acquired some miraculous powers, on which the Egyptians greatly pride themselves, returned to his own country, highly elated on account of them, and by means of these proclaimed himself a God."...
The point I would make from this material in the Jewish Talmud from the late first century is that it proves that Jesus was a person they felt they had to deal with and that it was sufficiently common knowledge that he worked signs and wonders that they felt they had to address this by claiming that Jesus did his miracles by the power of Satan (sorcery).
Does this “prove” that Jesus worked miracles? Maybe or maybe not.
What it proves is that many in his day were convinced that he worked miracles and that his enemies were aware of sufficient positive evidence of this that they felt they needed to explain it.
In summary, the request for “proof” in written documents that Jesus did in fact work miracles from non-believers is, logically, a very high bar indeed. We can assume that most of those who witnessed his miracles either came to believe in him or found ways to explain away what they saw. In fact, I believe that it is striking that we have these two documented examples of non-Christians feeling the need to explain what seems to have been common knowledge that there was much reason to believe Jesus worked miracles.
This does indeed corroborate the accounts of miracles and wonders performed by Jesus in the Bible.
@@jonathonrobinson7236 All nonsense, there is no god or heaven or hell, it's all man made because we're afraid of the dark, afraid to die.
@@stevewright4576 Those who knew Jesus wasn't afraid to die. They couldn't wait to die after He appeared to them after His resurrection.
Why have I found this amazing man so late. I disagree with his politics but can’t stop listening to him. Mr Hitchens, please accept this as my posthumous letter to a life well lived. RIP sir
His politics were complex, and changed over the years. That's just another reason to respect him more. He was honest and humble enough to change his mind and admit it when he did, or if not change his mind, at least change his labels to some extent. Almost nobody ever does that.
Sometimes, late at night, I like to listen to Hitchens for hours and absorb his great wisdom and eloquence.
I'm sorry my friend of your lack of discernment, Hitchens lacked wisdom and was a fool.
Proverbs 9:10
10 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding.
Proverbs 28:11
A rich man is wise in his own eyes, but a poor man with discernment sees through him.
Psalm 10:4
In his pride the wicked man does not seek God; in all his schemes there is no God.
Psalm 53:1
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, and vile in their ways; there is no one who does good.
Jonathon Robinson Do you have an actual argument to put, or are you just reaching for the ad hominem and the quotation of documents whose significant is unagreed?
@@bikelawbloke Did not agree with the late Ch Hitch....but he was not a fool., ..as a believer I think there are good Catholic grounds for thinking he is in Heaven...and would definitely not say he was in Hell...the sort of man I would have liked to have a pint with!
Me too - in the hope that some of his intelligence goes into my mind
Churlisshly - Me too - I listen to him for hours - one of the few voices of reason, who would probably now be ashamed of calling himself " leftist"
Christopher Hitchens created an hypnotic effect whenever he spoke.
Love people like these. Gore Vidal was another.
Only fools get hypnotized by men
@@dialmformowgli Most men get mypnotized by women
So so happy to have and will continue too listen to this insightful, articulate and humorous gentlemen.
Great man.
I wish I had known about him sooner. I’ve been a closet atheist for about 20 years. His words have given me the courage to open up about my lack of belief. What a great man. ❤️
Fool .
I grew up in the south and the fear of being disowned was strong. No one around me thought the way that I did/do so I felt like I had to stay quiet. I have since embraced it completely. ❤️
He is great indeed and well done about your courage ☺️
Being British it seems bizarre that someone would feel the need to be a closet atheist it’s almost the default setting for us
Religion has been used by man and changed to suit his greed and needs..
In 28 years of life, I think this is the first time I've seen Jeremy Paxman look at someone putting his hands down in admiration
Remembering Christopher each year around Christmas. Tearing up while watching this discussion. Miss you Hitch!
I miss him too. Loads. Especially in times that he is so much more needed.
You remember him during a Christian celebration. How very ironic.
@@ralphdavidson9542 What does that mean?
@@ralphdavidson9542 Around the time of his death :/
I watched this again today and it made me weep. Great men are in such short supply these days and I wish we still had his voice in the public discourse.
his brother is alive
@@EugeneVerster Peter is just not at the same level intellectually.
@@JeffreyGillespie how do you figure that, same genetics, same up bringing, same education, and in fact both used to have the same views.
however i would love to hear the objective (and provable factual) reason for why Peter was the dumber brother
@@JeffreyGillespie not sure he isn't as smart in fact I think his world view is more accurate than Christopher, but Peter lacks the hubris and charm of Christopher
@@EugeneVerster Used to have being the operative words, and not because Christopher is dead. It was no secret they barley tolerated each other the last 10 years he was alive. With Peter having a much more conservative and directly religious views.
When i was 15, I came across Hitch, on RUclips. His rhetoric scared me like nothing else, because he was making sense. My Faith was shaken, and I was certain I would go to hell for being convinced. Thanks hitch, for planting the some well needed seeds of doubt.
Hope you now enjoy sinning as much as the rest of us. I'm being a saint today though with my salad & uncustomary iced coffee ( usually wine). Cheers!
@@jaysterling26 haha, yes. Luckily my parents aren't hyper religious just (very) religious, and we have learned to co exist with our very different beliefs.
If you had doubt after listening to hitchens once , then I would say your faith was never strong in the first place. If it was shaken that easily.
@@TheeMrAbz Poor logic, founded on an un-evidenced belief. The ills of humanity in a nutshell.
@@peterweeds4682 in the end you will see the truth . No point arguing with you over youtube
If someone asks me the definition of dignity I'll send them this link
Exactly. I think I'll be returning to this interview a lot in the future
It is just transparent honesty, the ultimate humility and compassion derives from speaking the truth, as you understand. Dignity implies the seeking of respect for ones being or image, Hitchens never did this.
@dagnut dignity is not about seeking anything fro another ie respect, it's more about humility and conduct. You're thinking of affirmation. You're right that Hitchens never did this of course!
SPL look up the definition of the word. I am not trying to be pedantic, Hitchens would have said the same.
I actually did before I posted to double check; perhaps we are getting crossed wires in that case
So many people stumble through life begging the English language to express to the world their thoughts. This man commanded that language to bow to his will. It is no stretch to deem him a linguistic genius, and I cling to every word he speaks.
Beautifully said friend
His brother is that way too!
.
I'll second that...
Yes. Stunningly beautiful in his linguistics. I can listen to him for hours, and frequently do.
Such a shame that we lost him so young. This interview also shows Paxman at his best: challenging but still respectful.
Hes got hot feet now 🥰
@@toddcameron6298 "He's" - not "Hes".
Your spelling is as appalling as your gleeful, sadistic fantasies and Magical-thinking.
@@BiggieBig_ "Shut the fuck up" - not "shut the fuck up".
Your grammar is as appalling as your dictatorial demand and wishful-thinking.
N.B. Why did you delete your comment? Let me guess - embarrassment?
@@donthesitatebegin9283 are u really grammar policing on the internet😭u are not christoper hitchens, ur trying way too hard with unnecessary adjectives
@@ansxr916 Hilarious!
"In case you are watching this, and you ever wondered whether to write to anyone, always do, because you’d be surprised by how much of a difference it can make.” - Christopher Hitchens 28:14
I couldn't agree more!
What does he say after that? I quite couldn’t catch the exact words but I really wish to know
You will be surprised by how much ....??
@@Scaraptor619 im wondering too
@@Scaraptor619 how much difference it can make
Yes, kind words unsaid can lead to great regret.
He was so moved!
We lost a great man 10 years ago today. You'll never be forgotten. RIP Hitch!
And the tyranny came from a direction that he could never have foreseen.
He will be very well catered for, as he has gone to meet his Maker and explain...."27 Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment"
Hebrews 9:27 (ANIV)
@@earnestlycontendingforthef5332 Still butt-hurt over his hurty words, 10 years after his death?
@@baldieman64
LOL!
He hasn't hurt me at all...only himself and his now futile destiny, as he will find out to his cost on Judgment Day!
"49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth".
Matthew 13:48-50 (KJV)
@@baldieman64
True!!!
"God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee"
Luke 12:19-20 (KJV)
Hitchens was an absolute master of the English vocabulary. Sorely missed
I love the idea that, centuries from now, people will use a Hitchens quote as the ultimate argument winner.
And he was also an edgy twat who really wasnt very smart
@@suurmoguuli2149 - I have listened to many of Christopher Hitchens' debates and although I profoundly disagree with many of his views; I like to think we "God lovers" (as he once described) would never be so ungenerous as to mock another of God's children.
@@Remnants100 i dont believe in god tbh
@@suurmoguuli2149 - Fair enough, I respect your right to choose. Thanks for the reply.
I have seen many interviews until now, maybe less than a 60 yr old, but still enough, and this is one of the most emotional and courageous interview I have seen. He is a legend. He's a really really deep soul with an exceptional talent to convey it. Hats off, Rest in Peace, sir.
What a great man. So dignified. This should be listened to every so often. Grateful to have been introduced to me by my son. Thankful to BBC to have on RUclips -
Really wish he was still with us. The world right now needs a man of his wisdom and wit to give his perspective.
Regrettably, I didn’t know of Hitchens whilst he was alive, but what a tremendous guy he was… I feel very fortunate that there are so many videos of him available to soak up and ponder, and this one is particularly powerful and poignant. Paxman’s clearly somewhat in awe and Hitchens’ eyes seem to tell a story in themselves. Lovely stuff.
I think woke would of stopped early if he was still around ha
@@seane6616 Respectfully disagree, I think he would have explained what 'woke' actually means and why it is not such a bad thing.
@@MrArchie800 It's national socialist propaganda for "Modern audiences" ha, it's basis is lies and cherry picking of statistics to mislead people. Noway he would support it
@@seane6616 It’s always amusing when ignorant bigots act as though they comprehend what being woke means.
@@MrArchie800 He would have definitely agreed with woke because he didn't know the truth (Christ Jesus). The blind leading the blind (spiritually).
The heights of this man’s brilliance shines so much brighter in view of the depth of ignorance that has begun to grip the world. 😍😊
The most eloquent and enlightening interview I have ever observed.
Wow, the emotion at the end was so telling, the appreciation of the human word from others really got to him. Rest in peace Christopher. What an amazing man
Science is not able to explain emotions
Where is he resting?
@@athonyhiggins3117 Yes it is 😂😂😂😂
Why would he rest in peace?
Which is a religious statement given to those who lived for Christ faithfully and suffered the affliction of the world .
Now whether you believe that or not, you cannot attribute that to this man.
Neither would he wish to hear it from you.
Quite possibly the best interviewer I’ve ever heard in my lifetime. And worthy of interviewing the most important voice of our time.
Listen to the 6 voices of annelise michel.
I hope Thomas soul doesn't have to die to be recognized
He absolutely nailed how i would better describe my own experience of cancer. Not surprisingly for Christopher Hitchens, to be so eloquent. Thank you sir.
One of the best debater, orator, educator and author of our time. I wish he was still around today. He made a big impact to my life, miss him very much.
Me too, me too....
What is the best debater, orator, educator, and author of our time going to accomplish in the afterlife? This is what God says will happen to those who have rejected Jesus to follow satan, "Depart from Me, you workers of iniquity, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels".
Mark 8:36
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
@@jonathonrobinson7236 He accomplished a lot during his informative life and that’s what matters the most! You believe in Jesus Christianity and hell and that’s your belief and obviously helps you with your life but this has no meaning or sense to me. Good luck to you in the afterlife though 😌
@@jonathonrobinson7236 a deity wanting homage?
@@disct1597 Oh, you're playing the, ignorance is bliss, game.
My friend, consequences come with ignorance.
Eleven years since we lost you, Hitch. The world needs you now more than ever. Rest well good sir ❤️.
I think woke would of stopped early if he was still around ha
Couldn't agree more mate. One wonders what He would have made of the way the wold looks now
How can he rest when he is dead. He didn't believe in anything.
@@RashidAli-bp3mr Because he's dead lol, superstitious crazy people cant accept the reality of life. When we die, we...die...
@@seane6616 yeah
What a truly wonderful man.
He will never know the true meaning he has offered to do so many and it is with regret that he’ll never know what his words have meant to me. Indeed, I can only wish his family my best wishes.
What an incredible man.
RIP
I discovered Hitch only a few years before his passing when I was a college student. I vividly recall spending hours in the computer lab completely entranced by his debate performances. I had never heard anyone challenge convention with such wit, humor, and brute force. It set a course for my worldview in those formative years. After all these years, I still haven’t quenched my thirst for Hitch’s intellect and insight. What an amazing man.
I really loved Christopher. I miss him and wish he was still here. He’s been widely beloved, admired and respected by people from every walk of life. As a person with an affinity for words I truly admire him beyond measure. There will never be another like him.
The world lost a truly magnificent man. An immeasurable lose to humanity, reason and intelligence. Hopefully he inspired many, many others to take up his baton. He'll be sorely missed.
@Roger Loquitur unlike yourself! *slow clap*
He is being very well catered for, as he has gone to meet his Maker and explain...."27 Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment"
Hebrews 9:27 (ANIV)
@@earnestlycontendingforthef5332 What an evil person you are. Shame on you; a typical “religious person.”
@@earnestlycontendingforthef5332 In your dreams.
@@earnestlycontendingforthef5332 you really are a c@nt aren’t you?
This is a remarkable interview. I think Paxman was close to tears at several points- Hitchens respected him enough to answer with a brutal honesty that I think surprised Paxman.
Seeing the world in the scopes of atheism is a scary realization and I've to commend all these smart intellectuals that publicly announce and defend it
I find it striking that proof exists about Jesus from unbiased sources outside of the Bible. Some of these writers have provided direct evidence of Christians, while others have provided indirect evidence of the existence of Jesus and of His crucifixion. The writings of these writers offer a peek into the current events taking place from the late first century to the late second century. I find difficulty in downplaying or explaining away these writers' writings on the account of the prestige and social position they held, and the disdain illustrated in some of their writing.
Tacitus, The Greatest Roman historian, and senator
Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind.
He then describes the torture of Christians:
Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man’s cruelty, that they were being destroyed.
Mara Bar-Serapion,
He was a Syrian philosopher, who wrote a letter to his son sometime after AD 73. There is only one manuscript of his letter in existence and preserved in the British Museum.
"What advantage did the Athenians gain from putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as a judgment for their crime. What advantage did the men of Samos gain from burning Pythagoras? In a moment their land was covered with sand. What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their wise King? It was just after that that their kingdom was abolished. God justly avenged these three wise men: the Athenians died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by the sea; the Jews, ruined and driven from their land, live in complete dispersion. But Socrates did not die for good; he lived on in the statue of Hera. Nor did the wise King die for good; he lived on in the teaching which he had given."
Lucian,
"The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day-the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. … You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains their contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property."
Pliny the Younger,
Is another valuable historical source for information on Jesus and the early Church. Pliny was the governor of the Roman province of Bithynia, located in Asia Minor. In the year 112 AD, he wrote to the Emperor Trajan, asking how he should deal with those in his region who have been accused of being Christians.
In the letter, Pliny describes the practices of these “criminals”:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food-but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian
Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.
Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus,
Was a Roman historian and court official during the reign of Emperor Hadrian.
As the Jews were making constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus, he expelled them from Rome. Punishment by Nero was inflicted on the Christians, a class of men given to a new and mischievous superstition.
Thallus, a secular historian
Unreasonably of course, because a solar eclipse could not take place at the time of the full moon, and it was at the season of the Paschal full moon that Christ died.
Phlegon of Tralles, was a Greek writer
During the time of Tiberius Caesar, an eclipse of the sun occurred during the full moon".
Julius Africanus, wrote around AD 221
He quotes Tallus' comments about the darkness that enveloped the land during the late afternoon hours when Jesus died on the cross: Tallus, in the third book of his histories.
(Julius Africanus also quoting Phelgon of Tralles, Chronography, 18.1)
Have you wondered if there was any “proof” of the miracles of Jesus, outside the Bible (and outside of the writings of believers)? There are documents in which these writers provided us with evidence that Jesus worked miracles, but in writing, intended to downplay belief in such miracles.
The first comes from the Babylonian Talmud 43a. Babylonian Talmud (late first or second century AD) Babylonian Sanhedrin43a-b “On the eve of the Passover they hanged Yeshu and the herald went before him for forty days saying [Yeshu] is going forth to be stoned in that he hate practiced sorcery and beguiled and led astray Israel.
Here Jesus is accused of sorcery, in obvious parallel with the charge leveled in Matthew 12:22-23. The writer of the Talmud does not agree that Jesus worked bona fide miracles, but he reports that he did things which, to the enemy of Jesus could only be written off as sorcery.
In the very early century AD Jewish literature, in "tHul 2:22-23" it is reported that healings were done in the name of Jesus. So we have indirect confirmation of the crucifixion of Jesus and of his working of public miracles-only charging that the miracles were worked by Satan, not God.
Flavius Josephus, Jewish Historian
Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.
Celsus was a Greek writer in the second century who criticized Christianity as a threat to the stable communities and worldview that the "pagan" religious and social system sought to uphold. His work as a whole has been lost, but when the third-century theologian Origen sought to answer Celsus' charges in a work appropriately called Against Celsus, he preserved most of Celsus' criticisms. Origen's replies are certainly worth reading in their own right, but the following excerpt is chosen in order to show how a thoughtful "pagan" viewed Christianity.
[Celsus] accuses [Jesus] of having "invented his birth from a virgin," and upbraids Him with being "born in a certain Jewish village, of a poor woman of the country, who gained her subsistence by spinning, and who was turned out of doors by her husband, a carpenter by trade, because she was convicted of adultery; that after being driven away by her husband, and wandering about for a time, she disgracefully gave birth to Jesus, an illegitimate child, who having hired himself out as a servant in Egypt on account of his poverty, and having there acquired some miraculous powers, on which the Egyptians greatly pride themselves, returned to his own country, highly elated on account of them, and by means of these proclaimed himself a God."...
The point I would make from this material in the Jewish Talmud from the late first century is that it proves that Jesus was a person they felt they had to deal with and that it was sufficiently common knowledge that he worked signs and wonders that they felt they had to address this by claiming that Jesus did his miracles by the power of Satan (sorcery).
Does this “prove” that Jesus worked miracles? Maybe or maybe not.
What it proves is that many in his day were convinced that he worked miracles and that his enemies were aware of sufficient positive evidence of this that they felt they needed to explain it.
In summary, the request for “proof” in written documents that Jesus did in fact work miracles from non-believers is, logically, a very high bar indeed. We can assume that most of those who witnessed his miracles either came to believe in him or found ways to explain away what they saw. In fact, I believe that it is striking that we have these two documented examples of non-Christians feeling the need to explain what seems to have been common knowledge that there was much reason to believe Jesus worked miracles.
This does indeed corroborate the accounts of miracles and wonders performed by Jesus in the Bible.
This fella is super intelligent, thanx Mr Hitchins
@@jonathonrobinson7236 I can't begin to imagine what Jesus would have been capable of if he'd had your powers of copy & paste.
Having only discovered this amazing man in the last year all I have to say is he should be compulsory teaching at every university. A truest great man.
The poor man's Bertrand Russell.
@@2msvalkyrie529 Oh no, you could of said, the Modern mans Bertrand Russell but even then, two very different people and there was nothing poor or sub par about Hitch.
The worst thing about the description of cancer here is having someone so articulate to voice it.
Just" discovered" him last week and find him so compelling. As with many, I wish I had been aware of him much, much earlier. Even more so, how I wish he was still alive..the world needs minds and communication like Christopher.
You are on the correct path, in my opinion.
while he did have flaws like any other mammal he did communicate his meaning plainly.
I found him after his passing and 7 years after watching my first video I still find content I've not seen. Welcome to an awesome learning journey. His debates are better as you can learn both sides of the argument .
@@NunyaBusinessMKAbsolutely! Well spoken.
I met him. He was awesome in person... feet away... at the podium at a humanist conference in 2008. He had a mastery of words that thrilled and delighted me. And still do. I'm so sorry we lost him.
RIP Chris Hitchens, one of the greatest minds of the 20th and early 21st century.
I’m still so sad he’s no longer here. I wish I’d written to him when I had the chance and I promise it wouldn’t have been to cheer him up. It would have been sincere appreciation for his impact.
Write to his brother, heaven knows he could use some cheering up.
@@matt.willoughby i don't know about writing to the brother. but his son is a university lecturer dealing with radicalization. I would rather write to him. look him up.
Snap !
No need to be sad when Jesus has always been there for us.
@@jonathonrobinson7236 What bollocks!
Christopher Hitchens has been such a huge inspiration in my life; what a man?
I return to this interview often because it is such a candid meeting that could only be carried out by two men who clearly have enormous respect for one and other .
What part inspired you the most his depression his addictions his stupidity for killing himself ? His arrogance ? His utter contempt for anyone who disagreed with him ? I’d like to know .
Thank you
I met Mr Hitchens over the years and then, as in this interview, he made a conversation into a wonderful meal. A really fabulous human being.
What a strange and beautiful way to express yourself!
Very inspiring! He won’t jump into an emotional panic state but remains analytical.
He seems vaguely terrified and evasive, at least to me. He answers direct questions with rambling statements that sometimes lack coherence. Like belittling cancer as just another ailment like polio or smallpox, suggesting terror of these diseases is somehow irrational or "superstitious." Or incoherent, strange musings comparing having cancer to a woman being pregnant, hosting another organism inside one's body. That's at best a completely bizarre comparison. He thinks and hopes there is some kind of genuine philosophical insight there (i.e., as if cancer is an opportunity to learn about pregnancy, and possibly be more empathic to women and the burdens of bearing children), but the analogy is just to weak for these half-baked ponderings to go anywhere, and he's repeatedly just forced back on himself as an avowed atheist dying of cancer at a young age, whose physical appearance even before getting the illness implies he was living a decadently indulgent life, probably abusing liquor, food or other dangerous indulgences. I say all this not to rant sanctimoniously, but to say he looks like he might be worrying about a debt coming due, after defying and taunting the collector. That's just sort of the vibe he gives off.
@@AnonYmous-ry2jn I could not have put it better myself. I would have just summed him up as a bitter old pisshead.
@@AnonYmous-ry2jn Respect what you're saying. Not very nice reading though I have to say. Quite nasty in places.
@@brettpritchard265 thanks; I hate that it sounded or seemed nasty; and it’s not a sanctimonious, religiously driven kind of “here you see the decadent, libertine heathen getting his just dessert” type of rant, though it may seem that way. I’m deeply sympathetic to a great deal of what Mr. Hitchens says, particularly his heroically and eloquently calling out the Catholic Church on all the heinous abuses and hypocrisy. It’s just that as a supposed champion of science and rationality, he seems extremely passion-driven and appetite-driven, to an obviously self-destructive fault, and this may well discredit some of his arguments. It often appears, in this sense, that he is no more rational and scientific than his opponents, particular when he rants this way about cancer and dying: the things he says seem to come from fantasy and sophistry no less than the sophistries and fantastical thinking he accuses the Church of. And my impression is there may be an underlying fear (warranted or not), that his health condition could in fact be a divine comeuppance for his behavior.
I definitely don’t want that to be nasty. You know what they say by the way: there’s no such thing as an atheist in a foxhole. Do soldiers facing mortal danger retreat into childish fear-driven, religious fantasy? Or is a genuine insight awakened in those conditions? Thank G-d, I’ve never been there, or in Mr. Hitchens’ health predicament, but maybe instead of atheism a better stance would be a more modest agnosticism, if one does not find genuine religious faith compelling or tenable. To be an outspoken practically militant atheist probably triggers some self-questioning in many who find themselves battling cancer at a young age or thrown into a foxhole.
Btw: I recommend the movie “Indigination” or the Phillip Roth novel it’s based on (admitting to only read maybe a third of it; perhaps I’ll take it up again): it’s all about a self-proclaimed atheist’s finding himself in a position of severe moral culpability and confronting that punishment may not be some childish fantasy. The movie (or book presumably) seems to be saying that religious claims about divine or cosmic punishment and reward may be true, they may be false-- but life events compel us to consider the moral consequences of our actions which could be viewed in naturalistic of supernatural terms, and each person has to ultimately weigh what kinds of risks are worth taking; and it’s very possible that in a foxhole (or battling cancer), earlier swagger or confidence might find itself challenged by self-doubt.
@@AnonYmous-ry2jn yet you rant sanctimoniously.
A huge loss. One of the great thinkers of our age.
Sophist, not thinker.
The Aspergian Heteroclite You’re incapable of knowing (as is everyone) if he’s wrong about the existence of God, but it’s impossible to argue that he’s mistaken about religion.
@@colinwoods9601 but then surely the rebuttal is your statement?
@@aspergianheteroclite3014 I doubt you know what the word _sophist_ even means.
someone who, like a religious individual, appeals to people's emotions in the way he talks.
It deeply saddens me that I won't hear hitchens' take on things that occur in my lifetime, but I am full of appreciation for the life he did lead.
I didn’t know who this man was. A RUclips recommendation and I have been hypnotised from beginning to end, superb. His way of thinking from death/dying and regret have definitely provoked me into deep though, thank you! I will certainly check out his literary works :)
He has a twin brother, Peter, who's still going. Though unlike Christopher who was a socialist, Peter has conservative views, still recommend you check him out too.
I recommend his Memoir "Hitch 22"
@@MobinKiadeh not a twin. Peter is 2 years younger, also his legacy and wit is not even comparable to his older sibling's
I feel like I've lost a friend. What an amazing, articulate genius
We have his work. I’m grateful for that much.
Gone almost 10 years, but I still have the need to come back and touch the genius that is Hitch..
Bless you. I know what you mean. He understood what it means to stick to one's principles, and debate always from that point. He was true to himself in every moment and I wish I could have been like that. I miss him desperately.
So true, words of wisdom..
I think Ricky Gervais has a great take on religion but I can't get past the frivolous...🤔
@Gary Fletcher f**k off you fool.
@Gary Fletcher yeah, don't worry about me mate - I'll be fine. Worry about your own god, leave the rest of us alone troll.
It's my sincere hope that when it comes to face my own passing I can muster this level of courage
A great man has passed but most of us can be assured that he is remembered with respect and admiration.
And at the touch of a key Eternally, that's his gift.
Even describing his resistance against cancer and the propable end of his existence he was as eloquent and poetic as always!
I love the way he describes his "fight" with cancer. Im going through treatments and that is exactly how i feel. I am not "battling" or "fighting" i am *enduring*. It is my doctors that are doing the fighting.
Andrew I hope you’re doing well, my man,
Yes - I thought that was wonderful. I'm sorry to hear it, and hope things have improved.
All the best to you mate
well wishes Andrew
Sorry to hear Andrew, are you still around?
Every time I see an interview, speech or debate involving this man, I feel more educated about life!
If we all reflect like him …..what an honest and intellectually beautiful world this would be .
Satan has done his job
@@Nobodieslistening123 do you think your god would think your time is being spent in a valuable way?
@@tykingswell3717 sure I’m trying to help souls
@@Nobodieslistening123 But your not. Your not preaching in kind like Jesus did, your not seeking to ferry these people through expert and kind education. Your just being a “keyboard” warrior online to make yourself feel better about your “lack of damnation” ultimately god being an all seeing being would know this as well. I’d go so far to say, I bet your god thinks you’re a waste.
Having watched this interview a number of times I never ceased to be moved by Christopher’s philosophic acceptance of an ending of this life combined with his belief there was nothing more to follow, tempered with a subtle sense of cynical humour
which must have sustained him to the end. How badly this world needs him now. Thank you Hitch.
I wouldn't put all my marbles in a bag with Hitchens because he was a slave to blasphemy. He blasphemed the name of God at every opportunity.
None of you followers of Hitchens bothered to ask the big question. What was Hitchens's agenda? Hitchens followers don't realize that they have fallen prey and become haters of God and parrots, also blaspheming the name of God. I invite you to read the Word of God:
John 8:34
Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin.
Romans 6:16
Do you not know that when you offer yourselves as obedient slaves, you are slaves to the one you obey, whether you are slaves to sin leading to death, or to obedience leading to righteousness?
2 Peter 2:19
They promise freedom, but they themselves are slaves of sin and corruption. For you are a slave to whatever controls you.
My friends, it's evident what controlled Hitchens, you must decide what will control yourselves, whether it's sin or righteousness?
Christopher It’s been such a pleasure to hear your debates. I’m an Englishman and I’m always amazed by the vocabulary and your intellect. Shame we lost you
A touching and emotional ending to another wonderful set of comments from Mr. Hitchens. Compliments to the interviewer who was able to draw Mr. Hitchens out in a way other interviewers could not.
'We are born sick yet commanded to be well'
This man had such an unbelievable understanding of human nature, | think that's why I admire him so much
I loved this man while he was alive, and miss him sooooo much now that he’s gone. Brilliant, brilliant man.
Love never dies: I love him still.
I wouldn't put all my marbles in a bag with Hitchens because he was a slave to blasphemy. He blasphemed the name of God at every opportunity.
None of you followers of Hitchens bothered to ask the big question. What was Hitchens's agenda? Hitchens followers don't realize that they have fallen prey and become haters of God and parrots, also blaspheming the name of God. I invite you to read the Word of God:
John 8:34
Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin.
Romans 6:16
Do you not know that when you offer yourselves as obedient slaves, you are slaves to the one you obey, whether you are slaves to sin leading to death, or to obedience leading to righteousness?
2 Peter 2:19
They promise freedom, but they themselves are slaves of sin and corruption. For you are a slave to whatever controls you.
My friends, it's evident what controlled Hitchens, you must decide what will control yourselves, whether it's sin or righteousness?
@@jonathonrobinson7236 Go and preach somewhere else, the nut house is full of like minded people who may be more receptive.
@@thomasowens5824 My friend, this is the perfect place and to the perfect people.
God wants to save the lost souls or He wouldn't have given His Son as a sacrifice for our sins.
Repent from your sins and trust and believe in the Lord Jesus as your Saviour.
@@jonathonrobinson7236 Your logic is so messed up its laughable. Shame that the Jesus you have no evidence for, didn't take the oportunity to correct the corrupt repugnant scriptures, he could have easily declared Slavery is bad and the laws in the old testament are wrong, but he didn't, so he is morally corrupt as god was. Your god is a mass slaughtering narcissist, IF he actually existed he would have a lot of explaining to do, but a god that does not interact with reality is indistinguishable from a god that does not exist. You have bought into a book of fairytales written by the church to control Iron age peasants.....you have sacrificed morals, logic and critical thinking on the crooked alter of religion, no sir, this place is not for you.
We sorely need Christopher hitchen's honesty, integrity and iconoclasm now more than ever.
I fear for rationality in this time.
I know what SOME of those words mean!
we left "crazy" (usa) 3 weeks ago. We still have Noam Chomsky and Richard Dawkins.
28 minutes that everyone should take the time to watch
The tears in his eyes in reaction to Paxman’s death-related question makes me love Hitchens even more. What a human being.
what a sellout that married a rich jew, hated himself so much he drank himself to death. very sad
Timestamp?
@@aimanahmad645 😂😂😂
@@aimanahmad645 Shut your mouth and go back to hating Jews and stoning people to death, or whatever you do in your moral sewer of a society.
@@aimanahmad645 really?