In the year 1944 Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty performed series of experiments to find that the DNA was the "transforming principle".
It always kills me when I read stuff like this. Either you don't pay attention for shit, or your professor isn't cut out to profess. I'd assume the former because people have been receiving education long before RUclips years and research hasn't stagnated. There is absolutely no way in hell a 2 min simplified video teaches you more than a PhD in the field would in an hour. But to your point - yes, this video is really great at getting the point across efficiently.
@@Brickswol it's not about the content "to be taught", it's about the students/person "is actually getting" what I'm saying. You can invest an hour in teaching materials required/experimental apparatus etc. but what about the "concept"? Not all Ph.D holders are "good" teachers and also not all "good" teachers are Ph.D holders. Teaching is an art...
It was really good , but i think background music is very Loud so we do not concentrate to with loud music , so i suggest to you that plz keep slow tge music & Thank you so much 😊
I've figured it out~ in your statement, the thing that could not covert R to S is DNAase, not DNA(in the video they said it is DNA treatment which is the same thing as DNAse) what is DNAse? -> an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolytic cleavage of phosphodiester linkages in the DNA backbone, thus degrading DNA. -> degrading DNA means DNA cannot function normally, so in the experiment, it could not act as the genetic material and could not convert R to S~ In other 4 cases in the experiment/video, because DNA is still there(isn't degraded), R is converted to S~ hope it's helpful to you
This short video was significantly more helpful than my hour long genetics class. Thanks!
Exactly
So true
It always kills me when I read stuff like this. Either you don't pay attention for shit, or your professor isn't cut out to profess. I'd assume the former because people have been receiving education long before RUclips years and research hasn't stagnated. There is absolutely no way in hell a 2 min simplified video teaches you more than a PhD in the field would in an hour.
But to your point - yes, this video is really great at getting the point across efficiently.
@@Brickswol it's not about the content "to be taught", it's about the students/person "is actually getting" what I'm saying. You can invest an hour in teaching materials required/experimental apparatus etc. but what about the "concept"? Not all Ph.D holders are "good" teachers and also not all "good" teachers are Ph.D holders. Teaching is an art...
you are actually the most helpful person on youtube i have ever come across thank you so much
Thanks bro its be ause im handsome
short videos on such topics thats amazing ! These are very helpful!!
Exactly what I needed. Thank you, my friend.
It was really helpful thank you, just was hard to concentrate with the background music, i think i wouldve been better without it :)
This video saved my time... This is the easiest explanation.
Thank you so much! I finally understand this, really grateful for your sharing!!
This was extremely helpful as i have my exam tomorrow and i'm outta time...Thankyou!
Its really short and perfect
Short and Sweet! Perfect!
Short and easy to understand. Cheers!
ruclips.net/video/7eSSaiuTFBQ/видео.html
Very helpful and quick understanding
Beautifully explained.. really helpful
You saved my day
excellent way of teaching, thanku so much
ruclips.net/video/7eSSaiuTFBQ/видео.html
so much easier to understand thank you
hell of a job my dude
Thank you soooooo much the presentation is fantastic!!
i need the text that you say in the video please... like the last video
you wrote it in the description box
Great video, Thank you stranger!
It was really good , but i think background music is very Loud so we do not concentrate to with loud music , so i suggest to you that plz keep slow tge music & Thank you so much 😊
Extremely useful
Thanks to u brother ☺️😀 for amazing nd eaisier explained 👍👍☺️
Dna couldnot convert Rstrain to Sstrain .... how does it mean that its a transforming principle ??? ... plz somebody explain
i'm wondering the same thing!
me too ㅜㅜ
I've figured it out~ in your statement, the thing that could not covert R to S is DNAase, not DNA(in the video they said it is DNA treatment which is the same thing as DNAse)
what is DNAse? -> an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolytic cleavage of phosphodiester linkages in the DNA backbone, thus degrading DNA.
-> degrading DNA means DNA cannot function normally, so in the experiment, it could not act as the genetic material and could not convert R to S~
In other 4 cases in the experiment/video, because DNA is still there(isn't degraded), R is converted to S~
hope it's helpful to you
@@lyndseynguyen5617 oh thankyou .... so nice of you 😊😊
@@lyndseynguyen5617 then why did all the other substances work???
Thank you, this is very helpful.
subscribes thanks for saving my lazy ass night before exam
Most helpful 👍
It's heated s strain that was injected not R strain
Why can't all professors teach like you?!
Short but sweet
Thank you 🙌
Thank you.
Thankss ...it's very useful 😊👍🏻
Thanks a lot :)
Thanks u i am tejas Nagarkar
thank you
Very nice
I freakin' love this accent.
very helpful
really this understand easily thanks
Thank you so much
I guess there needs a correction he used diplococcus pneumonia .
Thank uhh so much😊
1:17
Respective enzymes?
1:15
Happy ....thank u
waw ,,,, thank you dr
se is what?
Top g
Jazzakallah!
Wow
short videos on such topics that are amazing! These are very helpful!!
Jazzakallah!