Although this may appear one sided, that would still result in human life on Earth effectively ending. Nuclear Winter would drop average temperatures to below 15*c, for a very long time, food would all but vanish, our social and economic way of life would end completely. Nobody wins, even a small scale (Never going to stay small scale) nuclear exchange would end our known way of life. Once you realise this, you realise how unbelievably on the edge of destruction we truly are.
I live 8 miles away from a nuclear power plant in southern NJ theres literally no chance of survival in this area if that thing gets nuked and it would too because power station.
Nope. I'm a rock stuck between two hard places less than 30 klicks from each other so I'm just gonna grab a deck chair, have a cold beer and jerk myself off until I'm insta dust.
my concern for a US response is how would we be able to launch over the pole without Russia losing their mind? "Trust me bro, they're going for china not you....."
The sanctions against Russia have especially made Russia friendly toward China since China is willing to be Russia’s economic partner after we have economically isolated Russia. This will naturally make Russia feel indebted towards China do that they will help China, like when China inevitably invades Taiwan or whatever. I do not think we will be able to win against China and Russia combined. I think we would lose, and I don’t mean “lose” as in packing your bags and going home, like at the end of the Vietnam War. I mean “lose” as in see quite a few of our cities destroyed or captured.
@@mechadoggy if it is a war between america and allies vs china and russia obviously a bunch of american cities will be destroyed and ppl killed. However, they won't be able to capture anything due to being unable to land on american soil. Still, doesnt stop them from destroying our cities, but if that does happen, they will suffer more destruction and american and nato forces will advance onto their country's soil and capture their cities. In the end, Americans and allies will win the world but at a great cost. China and Russia would probably get wiped out as their current government becomes extinct and Europe will turn into a 3rd world continent like modern Africa and half of North America destroyed with all major cities (especially west coast and east coast) in ruins. (this of course if a scene of conventional warefare) in a case of global nuclear war, at least 3/4 of the human population will be wiped out. If not during nuclear impact, then fallout. Here is a nuclear war simulation between Nato Vs Russia (this doesnt include china and other asian countries, so not a global nuclear war. If china joins in, the description in this video gets waay worse) ruclips.net/video/dxJHecyYBno/видео.html
@@florinivan6907 Why do you say that the 'cops would be gone'? Are police officers in the USA not that dedicated to their job? I'm from Brazil and it is hard to imagine the same happening here, where the police is an autonomous branch of the Army and is forbiden by law of going on strike or creating associations.
@@florinivan6907 I guessed that. I see news from your country where police officers are simply fired after some incident, and in the same fashion, they are easily hired. Here in Brazil serving in the police is nothing like that. It is a military career and the processes of joining and eventually leaving the force are lengthy.
They’d target our farmland in the middle US along with a handful of military bases. The mentality required to launch first would be a lot like a suicide bomber. They’d look for long term meaningful damage if they couldn’t win. Which means forgoing military bases if it means we can’t grow our own food for god knows how long.
Seeing all those lights Dim as nukes laid waste to the coast was slightly disturbing. Millions of lives gone, plus millions more from the fall out and infrastructure damage.
This is why it remains absolutely critical for us to NOT get involved with the war in Ukraine. We CANNOT risk this war erupting into a wider conflict lest it mean the possible extinction of our species.
@@FreddyonAcid Pine Gap US spy base is targetted by China and Russia. The only town within about 1000 km is Alice Springs. Whether Australian military bases, ports are targets depends on the scenarios run. I still assume Philippines military ports would be hit. Maybe Vietnam depending on regional strains.
Interested to know how China and Russia V the rest of the nuclear powers would play out, given the rhetoric being espoused by both of countries towards not only the U.S but its allies also.
It will look like this even worse for china and Russia . This example doesn’t even include the known secret “ America has nuclear missions in Europe “.
@Victor Peña consider that their focus won't solely be on the U.S. and Europe. Also, you'd have to take into consideration India firing nukes over the Himalayas, with the potential involvement from Pakistan. It would be interesting if, from the fall out, it would be total world devastation, or if there would be safe pockets of land, that could still be habitable.
Loved the video @TheDevildogGamer! Can't wait for the next video of Broken Arrow, DCS, Nuclear War Simulator, or even Company of Heroes 3 man! If there's one thing to remember about Any Missile, it's this: "The Missile Knows where it is, Because it knows where it isn't..."
No kidding. If there was a nuclear war, there would be no silence from nuclear armed countries. They would all be like "Oh shit oh shit LAUNCH THE MISSILES" and just fire them off wherever. There would probably be a good incentive to target other countries that are a threat even if they didn't fire at you because those countries would be untouched while hundreds of your cities are burning.
Violating the airspace for military purposes would probably be an act of war if it's ICBMs in the air, but they would probably be able to detect if the missiles are on a trajectory to impact them or another country.
@@Steven-cf1ty i assume russian detection systems would not be able to accurately estimate the trajectory until it reaches top of its arch. not to mention MIRVS are independently targetable i envision they would just launch..
Peter 2 - 3:10 - "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, and the earth also and the works therein shall be burned up."
With their current arsenal, China wouldn't bother with military targets. They would go for maximum civilian casualties. They don't have enough missiles to disarm the US to prevent their own destruction, and since they would be destroyed, hitting conventional military targets would be useless. They would try to do as much damage as possible by hitting as many cities as possible.
The problem is the US mirror images other countries. Disarming first strikes require not only at least an equal(actually more) number of nukes but a huge intel collection system. Only the US has a trully global system and even that is partially held up by US allies. The chinese would most likely conduct strikes on air force and naval installations including reserve plus obviously the US capital which strangely was not targeted. If you take a map and look up where those are located most are near urban centers. A strike only focused on these would devastate scores of large and medium sized cities killing upwards of 25 million and crippling the US as a country. To give just a couple of examples the combined population of the Honolulu Seattle Norfolk and San Diego metro areas where the 4 largest naval complexes and several other military installations are located is close to 9 million. LA has a Space Force base next to LAX. The second largest US city is pretty much a target just because of that.The US keeps talking about the silos because that's how the US hopes an enemy would fight. Nuking the silos means US bases on both coasts are in one piece. It seems though that US adversaries have noticed this fact and are only looking at the coastlines.
China's current arsenal is unknown and many reports have claimed for years that China easily has 1200+ nukes in its active arsenal. Considering their industrial prowess that surpasses the combined Western world, I think that might be true indeed.
@@ajaykumarsingh702 No, we have a pretty good idea how large their arsenal is. It's about 400 warheads. They are currently undergoing a massive expansion though.
also what happens to the panama canal. if that is destroyed then the world literally starves, shipping is forced into the suez canal and that will quickly become bogged down in a massive traffic nightmare.
It's supposed to be scary that's what keeps us safe. The moment we try to make it less scary the probability of it happening goes up not down. This is why ironically the nuclear disarmament movements are some of the biggest risks towards increasing chances of nuclear war.
Everyone always focuses on the initial deaths from impacts, fires and radiation, but the bulk would die over a period of a few months. Radiation sickness would claim a a lot, but billions would end up dying to starvation alone. All of the critical infrastructure and logistics would have entirely broken down, food wouldn't get to where it needs to go. Africa alone, despite not even being touched by a nuclear war, would probably shrink by half a billion if not more from lack of food imports and aid.
I would love to see more of these. I also loved your commentary on some military doctrine of the cold war and now regarding nuclear weapons, so if you could get more of that, that´d be great. Cheers from one of the iradiated places in Europe :D
The target saturation is outdated. I didn't see any nukes targeting the military man-made islands built up in the South China Sea. Definitely need to take those out as part of an overwhelming response.
This software solution is not a sound assessment of a nuclear exchange between China and the US. The Chinese mostly have megaton grade warheads and would deploy those mostly against cities were any nuclear weapon deployed on its mainland at this level of volume. It's unclear what their stockpile really is, there's evidence to suggest they have more than it reported. The Chinese definitely have rockets of several makes that can reach effectively all the entire continental US at this point, not just the west coast. However, from a counter-value standpoint, striking "just" the coastal cities would do tremendous damage to US, and I wouldn't think it would be able to recover from that strike, not as a world power. All of innovation and mindshare of the country are effectively concentrated along the West and Northeast. Furthermore, the targeting schedule the computer picked is absurd, given how many missiles were deployed on an asset like Guam. Very likely, the US government would collapse at the very least after the exchange, as continuity of governance assessments from the Nixon Era concluded just 30% to 40% damage to key urban environments would like prevent continuity of governance. Lastly we need to have secondary effects from nuclear winter modeled, hopefully the developer implements those soon.
@@pRaX85815 I was pointing out, that its dumb to be scared of something you have no control over what so ever. OH let me guess you are one of them "omg ban nukes" idiots that thinks if we just pretend the never existed, no one in the world will have them. A clue for you, that is a genie that can't be put back in the bottle.
@@obiesunstreak2409 No, but thanks for calling me an idiot and being aggressive for no reason. It wasn't me who came up with this "why be scared" tough guy bs, while both you and me know, you'll be shitting your pants just like rest of us when stuff is getting glassed.
@@pRaX85815 LOL oh poor snowflake, someone dared to call you out and you get so butthurt over it. I am in no way scared of nukes because I know there is nothing at all I can do. If they fly, we will never know it. Things will be over before you can blink your eyes. Being near a major population center as I am, I doubt I will live 1/10th of a second so... no time to be 'scared' But you sit there, cower in fear, cry. Waste your life trembling like the weak willed simp you are.
I seriously doubt we know the true number of nukes China has. It always cracks me up that people take their word and recognize "350" as their nuclear arsenal. For all we know, it's 1,000. We know they are working towards 1,500 publicly.
If they're following International Law, the UN can waltz in and count every delivery system and warhead they have. China, for nukes, seems to have always played ball with UN Law, so far.
I might be wrong. I'm just skeptical by nature. There's no way they aren't keeping secrets. Whether underground or hiding in plain sight, every country has secrets they hide. I think it's naive to underestimate* an adversary in any case. Edited for typo correction*
Chinese here. Yeah the official count was 350, I believe the number was promising back in the 2010s since the foreign policy back then (and also now) was 'autonomous and peace' and also the no-first-use pledge. But since the trade wars begun and the sino-american relationship continues to deteriorate，the situation asks for more nuclear power to achieve the nuclear balance. No doubt the new silos were built in the desert, shown by sat images. But the true count remains unknown. Though CNN says the number would be 1500 by 2035 but I highly doubt it. I think it's somewhere between 400-600 now and maybe will reaching the peak of 1000.
Even if it's just India vs Pakistan. With the 1300 years border skirmish. A few nukes exchanged. Results in billions dieing from starvation. Plants are really sensitive to even partial blockage of the sun.
It would be awesome if you could maybe do a video on what would happen at like the after effects of nuclear war I am very curious on what will happen after the war is all done and finished how long will it take until the Earth is back to normal????
but no longer than that because after we will die from global fallout through the whole world (except if you're chinese because odds are that you'll be already dead lucky bastard)
THAAD cant even take down Hamas rockets in 2021. After Bibi came and thanked Trump for giving it to Israel in 2019. Doubt they would even see it on a radar.
I guess the number of nuclear missles from a certain point of view is irrelevant. Wouldnt a few strategic missles be enough for nuclear winter and kill 99 percent of human life?
Would you survive the Nuclear War?
Although this may appear one sided, that would still result in human life on Earth effectively ending. Nuclear Winter would drop average temperatures to below 15*c, for a very long time, food would all but vanish, our social and economic way of life would end completely. Nobody wins, even a small scale (Never going to stay small scale) nuclear exchange would end our known way of life. Once you realise this, you realise how unbelievably on the edge of destruction we truly are.
Let's find out
I live 8 miles away from a nuclear power plant in southern NJ theres literally no chance of survival in this area if that thing gets nuked and it would too because power station.
Would you want to?
Nope. I'm a rock stuck between two hard places less than 30 klicks from each other so I'm just gonna grab a deck chair, have a cold beer and jerk myself off until I'm insta dust.
my concern for a US response is how would we be able to launch over the pole without Russia losing their mind? "Trust me bro, they're going for china not you....."
If China launches, its a good assumption Russia has too.
okay, lets start Nuklear war against them
The sanctions against Russia have especially made Russia friendly toward China since China is willing to be Russia’s economic partner after we have economically isolated Russia. This will naturally make Russia feel indebted towards China do that they will help China, like when China inevitably invades Taiwan or whatever. I do not think we will be able to win against China and Russia combined. I think we would lose, and I don’t mean “lose” as in packing your bags and going home, like at the end of the Vietnam War. I mean “lose” as in see quite a few of our cities destroyed or captured.
@@mechadoggy america isn't alone it's whole world vs russia china nkorea iran
@@mechadoggy if it is a war between america and allies vs china and russia obviously a bunch of american cities will be destroyed and ppl killed. However, they won't be able to capture anything due to being unable to land on american soil. Still, doesnt stop them from destroying our cities, but if that does happen, they will suffer more destruction and american and nato forces will advance onto their country's soil and capture their cities. In the end, Americans and allies will win the world but at a great cost. China and Russia would probably get wiped out as their current government becomes extinct and Europe will turn into a 3rd world continent like modern Africa and half of North America destroyed with all major cities (especially west coast and east coast) in ruins.
(this of course if a scene of conventional warefare)
in a case of global nuclear war, at least 3/4 of the human population will be wiped out. If not during nuclear impact, then fallout.
Here is a nuclear war simulation between Nato Vs Russia (this doesnt include china and other asian countries, so not a global nuclear war. If china joins in, the description in this video gets waay worse)
ruclips.net/video/dxJHecyYBno/видео.html
With as few nukes as they have, I think China would use a mostly counter-value strategy of ~100% civilian targets instead of 50/50 civ/military
@@florinivan6907 Why do you say that the 'cops would be gone'? Are police officers in the USA not that dedicated to their job? I'm from Brazil and it is hard to imagine the same happening here, where the police is an autonomous branch of the Army and is forbiden by law of going on strike or creating associations.
@@florinivan6907 I guessed that. I see news from your country where police officers are simply fired after some incident, and in the same fashion, they are easily hired. Here in Brazil serving in the police is nothing like that. It is a military career and the processes of joining and eventually leaving the force are lengthy.
They’d target our farmland in the middle US along with a handful of military bases.
The mentality required to launch first would be a lot like a suicide bomber. They’d look for long term meaningful damage if they couldn’t win. Which means forgoing military bases if it means we can’t grow our own food for god knows how long.
Somebody must have deleted a comment cause this comment string makes no sense
@@juicebox6581 Our criminally infiltrated FBI does that
Those last few bombers were just a slap in the face lmao 😂
Seeing all those lights Dim as nukes laid waste to the coast was slightly disturbing. Millions of lives gone, plus millions more from the fall out and infrastructure damage.
What do you think will happen to civilisation when the food supply collapses because of radioactive water.
This is why it remains absolutely critical for us to NOT get involved with the war in Ukraine. We CANNOT risk this war erupting into a wider conflict lest it mean the possible extinction of our species.
billions of lives gone and that was a gift. The punishment is the survivors
"Portland's gone, Seattle is gone." These terms are acceptable.
man i hope australia survives this
Thats a good question. Who would target Australia and why. Would you even be affected if all out nuclear war broke out?
@@mllecamill3 they would 100% get fallout if japan is struck but it’s hard to picture a scenario where a country sends a nuke to Australia.
@@FreddyonAcid Pine Gap US spy base is targetted by China and Russia. The only town within about 1000 km is Alice Springs. Whether Australian military bases, ports are targets depends on the scenarios run. I still assume Philippines military ports would be hit. Maybe Vietnam depending on regional strains.
I’m in australia, we’d be all good. Our government will launch our intercontinental boomerangs 🪃
@@Scottae89 😂😂 I’m in the states we are definitely getting it
Interested to know how China and Russia V the rest of the nuclear powers would play out, given the rhetoric being espoused by both of countries towards not only the U.S but its allies also.
It will look like this even worse for china and Russia . This example doesn’t even include the known secret “ America has nuclear missions in Europe “.
@Victor Peña consider that their focus won't solely be on the U.S. and Europe. Also, you'd have to take into consideration India firing nukes over the Himalayas, with the potential involvement from Pakistan. It would be interesting if, from the fall out, it would be total world devastation, or if there would be safe pockets of land, that could still be habitable.
In no scenario do we enter global nuclear war.
Come back when I am correct, and the fools adamant about the idea, are invariably all proven wrong.
Best guess is that China doesn’t actually have a missile for every silo.
And bet their detection radars hardly work
Heck of a bet to make...
and bet that china doesnt exist and is actually a construct of our imagination
@@theproceedings4050 There is a possibility that China build those silos to be decoys not intend to actually fill them with real ICBM.
And the ones they do have might not work or not reach their targets. Their tech is mostly lame. 1 of 5 aircraft are usually broken.
I love how the random pin drop outside of New York is pretty much right above my head.
Thanks bro, making me feel real safe over here lol
Loved the video @TheDevildogGamer! Can't wait for the next video of Broken Arrow, DCS, Nuclear War Simulator, or even Company of Heroes 3 man!
If there's one thing to remember about Any Missile, it's this:
"The Missile Knows where it is, Because it knows where it isn't..."
I wonder what the Russians would say if there were a ton of nukes just flying over their airspace lol
No kidding. If there was a nuclear war, there would be no silence from nuclear armed countries. They would all be like "Oh shit oh shit LAUNCH THE MISSILES" and just fire them off wherever. There would probably be a good incentive to target other countries that are a threat even if they didn't fire at you because those countries would be untouched while hundreds of your cities are burning.
Violating the airspace for military purposes would probably be an act of war if it's ICBMs in the air, but they would probably be able to detect if the missiles are on a trajectory to impact them or another country.
'blyat!'
@@Steven-cf1ty I am pretty sure that ICBMs operate above the "legal airspace" of those countries. But yeah, they would try to shoot them down anyways.
@@Steven-cf1ty i assume russian detection systems would not be able to accurately estimate the trajectory until it reaches top of its arch. not to mention MIRVS are independently targetable
i envision they would just launch..
Well the real issue is they don't tell us how many they really have, and they may pretend they only have like 500 or something..
I hope you post more? I find it very interesting and helpful to understand the magnitude of destruction a nuclear war can cause.
You get an idea once that's the only idea you need.
Heyo! I’m in Seattle, don’t lump us in with Portland. The cool people are just quiet over here.
is there a general nuclear exchange? where all nuclear armed countries fire their missiles rather than just two opposing countries?
Peter 2 - 3:10 - "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, and the earth also and the works therein shall be burned up."
Almost at a million subs, almost there
guam being nuked 18 times is quite concerning xD
With their current arsenal, China wouldn't bother with military targets. They would go for maximum civilian casualties. They don't have enough missiles to disarm the US to prevent their own destruction, and since they would be destroyed, hitting conventional military targets would be useless. They would try to do as much damage as possible by hitting as many cities as possible.
The problem is the US mirror images other countries. Disarming first strikes require not only at least an equal(actually more) number of nukes but a huge intel collection system. Only the US has a trully global system and even that is partially held up by US allies. The chinese would most likely conduct strikes on air force and naval installations including reserve plus obviously the US capital which strangely was not targeted. If you take a map and look up where those are located most are near urban centers. A strike only focused on these would devastate scores of large and medium sized cities killing upwards of 25 million and crippling the US as a country. To give just a couple of examples the combined population of the Honolulu Seattle Norfolk and San Diego metro areas where the 4 largest naval complexes and several other military installations are located is close to 9 million. LA has a Space Force base next to LAX. The second largest US city is pretty much a target just because of that.The US keeps talking about the silos because that's how the US hopes an enemy would fight. Nuking the silos means US bases on both coasts are in one piece. It seems though that US adversaries have noticed this fact and are only looking at the coastlines.
China's current arsenal is unknown and many reports have claimed for years that China easily has 1200+ nukes in its active arsenal.
Considering their industrial prowess that surpasses the combined Western world, I think that might be true indeed.
@@ajaykumarsingh702 No, we have a pretty good idea how large their arsenal is. It's about 400 warheads. They are currently undergoing a massive expansion though.
what game is this?
It would be wild to watch from the Space Station.
Like your vid’s devil dog. Been watching since the good old days
also what happens to the panama canal. if that is destroyed then the world literally starves, shipping is forced into the suez canal and that will quickly become bogged down in a massive traffic nightmare.
as a person that lives in Alaska, we won't miss you either.
It's supposed to be scary that's what keeps us safe. The moment we try to make it less scary the probability of it happening goes up not down.
This is why ironically the nuclear disarmament movements are some of the biggest risks towards increasing chances of nuclear war.
it makes zero sense to engage in nuclear war. zero.
Everyone always focuses on the initial deaths from impacts, fires and radiation, but the bulk would die over a period of a few months. Radiation sickness would claim a a lot, but billions would end up dying to starvation alone. All of the critical infrastructure and logistics would have entirely broken down, food wouldn't get to where it needs to go. Africa alone, despite not even being touched by a nuclear war, would probably shrink by half a billion if not more from lack of food imports and aid.
“Ain’t gonna miss em!” - best comment ever.
Lol Portland is a dump anyway 🤣
Do ICBMs rely on satellite/GPS? If so, if one side dominates space are the ICBM's still deployable?
That's a lot of fried rice.
The only winning move is not to play
Germany like “what did I do 😭”
I would love to see more of these. I also loved your commentary on some military doctrine of the cold war and now regarding nuclear weapons, so if you could get more of that, that´d be great. Cheers from one of the iradiated places in Europe :D
Disappointed there are no Fallout comments.
you should try and do a complex event, where the US/NATO clash with BRICS nations and its allies. should be interesting.
This is the likely occurrence, but he's probably saving it for a final segment lol
BRICS???????????? it's an economic group
Brics is a economic alliance it has nothing to do with military
@Galgonite yes but outside of India it's basically who we will fight in ww3
It will look like this but more one sided when US Launches it’s missiles stored in Europe
“In 2025”
Bruh, that’s two years and one of the countries are us 😂
The target saturation is outdated. I didn't see any nukes targeting the military man-made islands built up in the South China Sea. Definitely need to take those out as part of an overwhelming response.
is it possible to do an all out ww3 scenario where everyone is involved?
When you have 3000 nukes blowing up and you say you got out of it waaaaaaaaay better than they the other part…
I really want to try this out. My old computers are not fast enough.
This software solution is not a sound assessment of a nuclear exchange between China and the US. The Chinese mostly have megaton grade warheads and would deploy those mostly against cities were any nuclear weapon deployed on its mainland at this level of volume. It's unclear what their stockpile really is, there's evidence to suggest they have more than it reported. The Chinese definitely have rockets of several makes that can reach effectively all the entire continental US at this point, not just the west coast. However, from a counter-value standpoint, striking "just" the coastal cities would do tremendous damage to US, and I wouldn't think it would be able to recover from that strike, not as a world power. All of innovation and mindshare of the country are effectively concentrated along the West and Northeast. Furthermore, the targeting schedule the computer picked is absurd, given how many missiles were deployed on an asset like Guam. Very likely, the US government would collapse at the very least after the exchange, as continuity of governance assessments from the Nixon Era concluded just 30% to 40% damage to key urban environments would like prevent continuity of governance. Lastly we need to have secondary effects from nuclear winter modeled, hopefully the developer implements those soon.
I mean, you can make your own, more realistic, scenario if you really want to. Nobody's stopping you.
@Techno Idioto working on it
US vs Russia and China would be cool
The Chinese ones would probably mostly work, the Russian ones, I'm not so sure.
Even with the catostrophic losses China would still have over 700 million people left. Unreal
don't forget the fallout, lasts up to centuries.
I mean... any kind of actual nuclear war is scary.
Not really, if one kicked off, none of us are going to be around 20 years after so... what is to be sacred of?
@@obiesunstreak2409 That's like saying that "you'll propably not be around for more than 60-70 years, why wait?".
@@pRaX85815 I was pointing out, that its dumb to be scared of something you have no control over what so ever.
OH let me guess you are one of them "omg ban nukes" idiots that thinks if we just pretend the never existed, no one in the world will have them. A clue for you, that is a genie that can't be put back in the bottle.
@@obiesunstreak2409 No, but thanks for calling me an idiot and being aggressive for no reason. It wasn't me who came up with this "why be scared" tough guy bs, while both you and me know, you'll be shitting your pants just like rest of us when stuff is getting glassed.
@@pRaX85815 LOL oh poor snowflake, someone dared to call you out and you get so butthurt over it.
I am in no way scared of nukes because I know there is nothing at all I can do. If they fly, we will never know it. Things will be over before you can blink your eyes. Being near a major population center as I am, I doubt I will live 1/10th of a second so... no time to be 'scared'
But you sit there, cower in fear, cry. Waste your life trembling like the weak willed simp you are.
Nothing aimed at Australia? That doesn’t seem right
People who live in Seattle watching this with me included be like ✌️ seeee ya later 😂
what about China, Russia, NATO, US in different combinations??
I love these videos you do, interesting stuff, you also sound like you know a few things, idk if you do but you sound like you do. nice
Any nuclear war is scary, Brainiac.
you forgot to include the treaty countrys with china and the usa
The US West Coast will really be toast in this scenario.
Portland and Seattle won’t be missed? 10:01
9:54 lol, based.
I seriously doubt we know the true number of nukes China has. It always cracks me up that people take their word and recognize "350" as their nuclear arsenal. For all we know, it's 1,000. We know they are working towards 1,500 publicly.
You would be surprised how easy nukes are to detect
If they're following International Law, the UN can waltz in and count every delivery system and warhead they have. China, for nukes, seems to have always played ball with UN Law, so far.
I might be wrong. I'm just skeptical by nature. There's no way they aren't keeping secrets. Whether underground or hiding in plain sight, every country has secrets they hide. I think it's naive to underestimate* an adversary in any case.
Edited for typo correction*
@@TheDevildogGamerI take it we can detect the radioactivity?
Chinese here. Yeah the official count was 350, I believe the number was promising back in the 2010s since the foreign policy back then (and also now) was 'autonomous and peace' and also the no-first-use pledge. But since the trade wars begun and the sino-american relationship continues to deteriorate，the situation asks for more nuclear power to achieve the nuclear balance. No doubt the new silos were built in the desert, shown by sat images. But the true count remains unknown. Though CNN says the number would be 1500 by 2035 but I highly doubt it. I think it's somewhere between 400-600 now and maybe will reaching the peak of 1000.
this is a simulation based on China having only "250" nuclear missiles (since the 1970's). You think CHina still has only 250 ?
Damn that's a dope simulation
Even if it's just India vs Pakistan. With the 1300 years border skirmish. A few nukes exchanged. Results in billions dieing from starvation. Plants are really sensitive to even partial blockage of the sun.
How do you get this scenario? Have you uploaded it as a mod?
Gotta do a NATO vs REDFOR (CN, RU, NK)
What game is this
7:40-7:47, 7:51-8:00
Try India vs China, it's more "balanced" and also realistic
Subed for the not missing Portland comment alone. Lol
what program are you using?
who made the little "devildoggamer subscribe" pop up close to the start of the video? I saw the same one for a different channel and now im curious
Lmfaooo they made that naval base a non nuclear priority to flex the us navy
It would be awesome if you could maybe do a video on what would happen at like the after effects of nuclear war I am very curious on what will happen after the war is all done and finished how long will it take until the Earth is back to normal????
hundreds of years most likely.
Depends son what you mean by normal. The earth will turn, plants and animals will survive. Humans even might. Not all of em though. Not a lot of em.
Not long
Once the missiles are out of their silos, are they vulnerable to emp?
i was wondering this awhile ago, wonder if they could detonate a emp device in space and potentially stop them?
@@Heggy420 That would be GREAT.
At a budget of 700 billion a year for decades I highly doubt the US doesn’t have a counter emp or hypersonic interception capabilities
@@victorpena3129 as if every thing is went into military gear development and not in the industries deep pockets.
Haha portland gone. Aimt gonna miss em had me dying
What is this simulator I would love to get it
I would survive anything (knock on wood)
Do India vs Pakistan. That's the most likely scenario for a nuclear exchange. Also both countries have insane population density
I miss that intro you used to have in your videos
You should try USA 🇺🇸 vs. North Korea 🇰🇵 Nuclear War (even though the outcome may be pretty obvious)
And the winner is....
Sorry nobody left to answer that! 😮
0:00-0:17
this simulation is assuming CHina is in the 1980's and the US is in the 2030
we will all be stunnned for a day when it starts
but no longer than that because after we will die from global fallout through the whole world (except if you're chinese because odds are that you'll be already dead lucky bastard)
2025? Let's just do it now.
Where are the nuclear submarines of china and usa
Does this not simulate intercepts from THAAD, or the anti ballistic missiles at Ft Greeley?
It can, but you would need to place them yourself.
THAAD cant even take down Hamas rockets in 2021. After Bibi came and thanked Trump for giving it to Israel in 2019. Doubt they would even see it on a radar.
What’s the name of this game ? Where can I find it?
So confident, come and try, do you have the guts?
I guess the number of nuclear missles from a certain point of view is irrelevant. Wouldnt a few strategic missles be enough for nuclear winter and kill 99 percent of human life?
No
In every scenario we germans are very screwed.. 😢
I’d rather be ruled by GPT5 after seeing this
Welp better save up those Bottle Caps Folks. Im already getting word from a Settlement in Ohio ill mark it on your map.😭😂
what is the name of the "game" ?
china and russia is in the worst tactical position when it comes to nukes however they roll the dice they lose
Scary is Russia would sit idle
This seems like a nothing but a win, China AND Portland gone. When can we start
As an alaskan, i will definitely miss me 🙄
Exactly. We won't miss 'em.
Think its a possibility for them to be lieing about what they really have?
Why not? Just for good measure!
Are u sure the world stays intact. ?
Well...Guam is gone...what do u mean it's gone...I mean it's not there anymore 😂
They want AU$42.00 on Steam. I think they are dreaming.