U all think VW is faster because it has upscaled clocks. Time from 0 to 100 is really almost exact but because of upscaled clocks you think VW is 2 or 3secs faster. It's an illusion.
Ikr and the Bi-Turbo 2.0 TDCI Mondeo Powershift does it in 7 seconds and if it was available as a manual and not just an auto it would do it in 6.7 seconds!
je trouve sa vraiment moche ces toutes petites aiguilles sur un gros compteur comme celui là tout sa par ce que ford fait des économies sur l'écran en mettant l'écran le plus petit possible je préfère un compteur physique plutôt q'un compteur numerique qui veut se la jouer premium pour un résultat à chier
@@zenchilli3905 as an example, the 2.0 tdci mondeo is arround 1700 kg, one of thr heaviest. The 2.0 tdi passat is 1400. So older cars would be much lighter too :)
I make 7.8 with my diesel, but it's pretty new
Not bad :)
Acutally for a Diesel it is pretty bad.
@@kevineis9088 Do you know the weight of a Mondeo? It aint exactly light.
So laut ist motor?
U all think VW is faster because it has upscaled clocks. Time from 0 to 100 is really almost exact but because of upscaled clocks you think VW is 2 or 3secs faster. It's an illusion.
i only trust when i see GPS timing even using mobile phone, most of tacho are not showing proper true speed
I don't understad this stupid practice where people use max rpm for diesels. There are no power nor torque and you push the pedal like idiot.
For diesel engine it is not bad to rev it as high as 4400 rpm. Later than that it's not effective at all.
Hardly any slower than a focus ST diesel at 0-100
Ikr and the Bi-Turbo 2.0 TDCI Mondeo Powershift does it in 7 seconds and if it was available as a manual and not just an auto it would do it in 6.7 seconds!
Test 240 km 2.0
0:57 Link missing
Der Diesel motor klingt genauso wie bei vw und audi
Tails 21 es ist auch ein 4 Zylinder mit 2 Liter Hubraum. Viel Spielraum für anderen Sound gibt es zumindest bei Dieseln nicht.
Average performance for a 180 HP engine
VWs 2.0 is far more enthusiastic I think
Youre right but still very good and nice looking car.
2.0 tdi 184 ps in lighter „sporty” octavia vrs got same time
@@sebbe5004 I ve seen far better times from Octavia even in you tube
@@ponygt6629 different drivers, thats why
Octavia is smaler and lighter. Id rather have a big car. Noone cares for the 1 second faster from0-100.
je trouve sa vraiment moche ces toutes petites aiguilles sur un gros compteur comme celui là
tout sa par ce que ford fait des économies sur l'écran en mettant l'écran le plus petit possible je préfère un compteur physique plutôt q'un compteur numerique qui veut se la jouer premium pour un résultat à chier
When did 180 hp in a diesel become so slow damn
Do you know how heavy this car is?
@@mustafaozdemir8958 thats a good point. But no i dont
@@zenchilli3905 as an example, the 2.0 tdci mondeo is arround 1700 kg, one of thr heaviest. The 2.0 tdi passat is 1400. So older cars would be much lighter too :)
@@mustafaozdemir8958 oh holy shit 1.7 tons
@@zenchilli3905 yea, fir that weight that's a pretty good time from 0 to 100😂
Total shit compared to a VW or an Audi of the same engine size !!!
its not though
Lol what