happy when you want Martin Scorsese sooner or later in the next film about Avengers or Avengers 5 will win the first Oscar Statuette in the future so you will see your next reaction when you see that Avengers 5 will win the Oscars. Martin scorses is glad that BLACK PANTHER dind t win for Oscar. Fuck black panther e Martin Scorsese
The first war film to be nominated for the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects in nearly 50 years. The last war films to be nominated were Patton and Tora! Tora! Tora!, with the latter film taking the prize.
@@jwelch5742 you're wrong, in 2002 the war film "Pearl Harbor" was also nominated for best visual effects and even though the movie "Forrest Gump" is not a 100% war movie, it does have war elements and it was nominated and won best visual effects as well
@@louisberry4403 ba... for 1917. I suffered for more than 4 years that a cinecomic film turned out to be one of the best cinecomics of Marvel/Sony, no one underestimates Spider-Verse until it has won an Oscar. (that is, what I want is revenge against the critics who are against Marvel films)
The first movie politicy corrent no Oscar black panther. 1917 desverved ot thought. Marvel Studios you're as suck. What that you dong Avengers Endgame is snubbed.
I didn't even know they used visual effects in the movie, I though they build the whole thing. Anyway they deserved to win, way better VFX than Endgame and The Rise of Skywalker
1917 is probably one of my favorite winners of this category alongside Blade Runner 2049 and First Man. VFX are not only about making Iron Man fly or how many pixels and triangles the Hulk has.
@Diego Pisfil 1917 created more of an impact as a movie with the storyline and its depiction than the Irishman (which is also a good movie nevertheless).
Cats (2019) is visually repulsive, but this is what I like about James Corden and Rebel Wilson. They are not afraid to laugh at themselves, and sure as hell give us entertainment all the way!
Vits Vicente Torres That’s kinda hard to decide. Since Endgame absolutely deserved the nomination. And I haven’t seen 1917 or The Irishman so I can’t say for sure if they deserved it or not. I’m just surprised that Alita didn’t get nominated, I thought it would for sure
@Vits Vicente Torres For me, it would easily be Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker. I mean, I get it that Star Wars has revolutionary visuals since A New Hope was considered to be a game changers. But the visuals in TROS looked so underwhelming to me. Compared to the planets in the original and even the sequel trilogy, the represented planets in TROS do not look fun to be in at all. A lot of areas around the movie look really dead. And the CGI of the creatures looked very poor. Even Palpatine’s CGI was a huge downgrade from both ROTJ and ROTS. But that’s just me. I know some poeple liked TROS visuals. It doesn’t look that bad, but yeah Alita or even Ad Astra were more worthy nominees than TROS.
This... This is just insulting. If I were Jeremy from CinemaSins I would give you one thousand sins for even thinking of reminding us of that abomination Cats movie.
In my opinion The Irishman was a clear best editing pick but aperrently not, editing shortened out that runtime from 3 and a half hours to 2 hours you have to respect that.
Let's ignore the _Cats_ sketch and talk about why _1917_ deserved this award. When I first saw this film, I refused to believe that any CGI was used at all save for a few touches and anything that couldn't be done with live humans (E.G. the waterfall scene). It was only after I looked up the visual effects reel that I realized how much was used... but at the same time, it does something that most photorealistic CGI these days fails to achieve. In more effects-heavy films like _The Lion King_ and _Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker,_ it's gorgeous to look at, even though you know none of it is. In _1917,_ I was fooled and believed all of it was real - the burning building, the fog around No Man's Land, and so on and so forth - and despite all the CGI, it actually made the experience feel that real. It's unusual for the Academy to recognize such raw, subtle, and unusual brilliance when they see it, so let's savor it (then again, they gave Best Picture to _Parasite,_ so I guess this wasn't the only category in which they recognized this type of genius).
It's alright. The Academy isn't much of a big fan of monster movies, (Except for Alien, Jaws, The Exorcist, so on and so forth.) Hell, the first King Kong wasn't even nominated for anything during 1934. I know the film came out in 1933, but keep in mind, the Oscars are held to nominate films that came out one year after the film was actually released. But now, they have a tad bit of a soft side, as they nominated Kong: Skull Island for Best Visual Effects, and honored Haruo Nakajima (the actor for Godzilla) during the 90th Oscars Memoriam.
@@0807jacob Yeah. Not only that, but BOTH Remakes of Kong (1976, 2005) got Oscars for VFX. So, my gripe is, they're willing to acknowledge Giant Gorillas, but not Radioactive Lizards?
@@OddOneOut665 I get that. I am a Godzilla fan too. However, you are admittedly stuck in the present, where Godzilla is praised as one of the best movies of all time. You need to understand the past. You see, Godzilla is not as successful in America as it is in Japan. The first Godzilla film, Gojira, was released at what may be one of the worst times in human history. As a result, America censored Godzilla, which made the film's reputation grow rotten. As a result, the more films were released, the more cheesy America presented them. Even one of the best of the Godzilla films, Shin Godzilla, was mixed in America. King of the Monsters was also not successful in critical terms and box office. Meanwhile, King Kong is frequently cited as one of the most important American films of all time. This is why the Academy prefers King Kong over Godzilla.
But don't worry. There's an Academy in Japan, and gave Shin Godzilla the big one. Actually, 7 big ones. America wishes that movies like Shin Godzilla can win Best Picture, Best Director, Cinematography, Art Direction, Lighting Direction, Sound Recording, and Film Editing.
Black panther desrved for nomination oscar best visual Effects not Endgame. Ooooooh avete rotte le scatole PORCA PU######## FA##### BLACK PANTHER E LA POLITICA CORRENT
@Diego Pisfil you clearly have garbage taste in VFX if you don't see how 1917 should win. Why don't you try making a movie which looks like it was made in one shot? I challenge you. And I'll present you an oscar if it's half as good as 1917 or birdman was.
If you say that Endgame should have won you know nothing about visual effects techniques. The effects in Avengers are good but it's just CGI This movie does not offer any new solutions when it comes to the process of creating vfx. We've seen it all in previous Marvel movies. We only have greenscreen and motion capture here. I don't like the new Lion King and we also only have computer effects here. But I have to admit that the accuracy in creating CGI animals is amazing. These lions were not motion capture, it was an animation created from the beginning using a computer without actors. The realism of movement and appearance of animals is very impressive. But Robert Legato won 3 years ago for a very similar type of effects in the Jungle Book, so I understand he didn't win now. 1917 combines practical effects with CGI. And as we know, even the smallest practical effects are better than the large ones created by computer. Here the task was even more difficult, because the film was made to look like a master shot and applying practical special effects in such long scenes without cuts is very difficult. We have real explosions and pyrotechnics here. CGI is so great that you can't distinguish it from real elements. For example, in the scene of a blazing city, some parts of the production design were created by computer. The rats were also not real, they were whole CGI. So 1917 definitely deserved to win.
@Diego Pisfil and the Irishman did? The digital de-aging trope has been around for a lot longer. So guess what? Even the Irishman brought nothing new to the table. What's your argument now?
Do you think you and your fucking favourite members of oscar academy is sooo much talented than the people of the whole world...!!!The income of YOUR favourite 1917 is Only $ 383 million which is almost equal to the cost of Marvel's endgame.😆😆😅.Do you know whats it's gross total income???its $2.79 billion....you idiot
@@troublemaker3587 so what? Money is not synonymous with quality. Even garbage like Venom, Suicide Squad & Transformers earned shit ton of money, does that make it good? Fuck outta here marvel fanboy
No, "Endgame" was more deserving than "The Lion King". "The Lion King" was ambitious but lacked the heart of Favreau's earlier Disney redo. But still, this should have been the one category "The Irishman" should have won.
@@AngelofMusic04 lol, why are bitching about the whole Lion King movies .. Lion King VFX is great and in facts they made in VR is really something new and it is an achevements
@@ronaldmcdonald2817 nope, 1917's VFX are way better than Endgame. More realistic, unnoticeable and not overused unlike Endgame. Also Endgame had the same amount of CGI as previous Marvel movies, nothing special about it anymore, they also overused CGI in some scenes and the effects are noticeable. The Academy rather look at visual effects that are realistic, unnoticeable and not overused. Tbh, I didn't even know 1917 used VFX, I thought they build the whole set. "1917 is a better movie but the visual effects are bad" Lmao, watch 1917 again bruh, the visual effects in that movie was way incredible and way realistic. Like the 1917 VFX team said "The Visual Effects is something you couldn't noticed" and that's for 1917, the visual effects in that movie are unnoticeable not like Endgame 1917 deserved to win, not Endgame. Stop being salty you Marvel fanboy!! I can't believe how stupid you are, calling a better movie but the visual effects are bad 😂😂😂. Someone didn't paid close attention enough to 1917
@@Erasureeraser First of all. The VFX in 1917 are pretty noticeable. The CGI rats look terrible same with burning Church. Second: Avengers Endgame created one of the best CGI characters of all time with Thanos. The VFX were praised by critics while 1917s weren’t. Third: paying attention to the VFX would make them worse. Fourth: I’m not a marvel fanboy for thinking Endgame should have won. Going straight to insults is immature and Sad.
@@jyothis.n629 1917’s VFX are not very good. The CG rats look pretty fake and the burning Church also looks a little bit fake. Endgame has terrific VFX and Thanos is one of the best CG characters ever.
Ok, stop crying, Marvel fans. I love Endgame as much as the next person and its visuals are great but we’ve seen them in every single MCU movie before. It’s nothing very special.
@@Erasureeraser, yep. Both Endgame and Rise of Skywalker have near flawless effects but it’s something we’ve seen 2000 times already. The effects in 1917 however look so real it’s hard to believe it’s CGI unlike RoS and Endgame where it’s obvious CGI was used even if it’s great CGI
@@dariussalepetru9951 The Academy voters has the opinion and so do I because I never disagreed with them. They're always right. People should agreed with the Academy voters opinions like me.
@@jwelch5742 just as I thought. jwelch5742; The man who dickrides the academy. But in this case I have to agree that 1917 was the best choice. They had combined practical effects with cgi and half of the stuff wasn't even real. But they made it sooo well that we wouldn't notice it was cgi. The rats scene was completely computer generated. Some of the big explosions were practical and cgi. Unique win well deserved!!
Avengers endgame deserved it just for the portals scene and the seamless time travel quantum suits. 1917 was also good but I wanted endgame to win so much
Denis You know Marvel isn’t for specifically for kids right? Kids alone wouldn’t allow it to become the highest grossing film of all time. Endgame was a breathtaking achievement in filmmaking whether you want to admit it or not. I don’t care if you don’t like the movie, that’s fine by me. But can’t deny it’s achievements. It got amazing reviews from ADULT critics. It was nominated for multiple Visual Effects Society awards. It should have won in my opinion because it combined many different elements of VFX such as CGI, practical effects, de-aging, motion capture, hundreds of CGI body doubles, etc. While 1917 looked amazing, I didn’t think that was because of the VFX. The cinematography and production design was special in that film, NOT the VFX. I have yet to find a VFX breakdown of 1917 on youtube other than George MacKay jumping into the river. I read that one of the VFX artists most challenging work was “adding mist into No Mans Land”. Uh okay? Big budget films like Endgame do that shit all the time when they composite their big action set pieces. 1917 is the most disappointing VFX win in the past 10 years, tell me i’m wrong.
Good thing Lion King didn't win this and I hate to say this but after wining this award while also being nominated for Rise of Skywalker, Dominic Tuohy may get an Oscar nomination for Best Visual Effects for Dolittle despite the reviews.
@DARIUS-PETRU SALE No Endgame didn't deserved to win, the VFX aren't that special anymore, 1917 deserved it because the VFX wasn't noticed in the film, they deserved to win.
Yeah, great idea to have the 2 actors in “Cats” (2019) that gave the worst performances present the award for Best Visual Effects dressed and acting like cats..... NOT!
The reason why Endgame lost is because there were some special effects that were beautiful to look at but you notice a lot that it is fake especially the CGI of Professor Hulk but there is not one without three 1917 really has some really beautiful but realistic special effects so 1917 has won for best special effects. But if there is one thing that Sam Mendes' film deserves and I get slapped, it comes sooner rather than later. *SPIDERMAN:ACROSS THE SPIDERVERSE*
__Anne Blythe__ With the name it wasn’t hard to catch😂😂 But yeah the accent is...😂 And as a french native speaker I can say that both the voice and the cats pronounced his name so wrong!! But it’s understandable of course!!
That was bullcrap. Regardless if you hated the movie, The Lion King is the most groundbreaking achievement we've had in visual effects! That entire film was an animated film that looked completely photorealistic, whereas 1917 had very minimal effects work, where most of the scenes with VFX shots barely looked any different from the before photos. And anybody in the comments who tries to tell me that animated movies shouldn't be considered VFX, keep in mind that this has happened TWICE before. The Nightmare Before Christmas was nominated, and Kubo and the Two Strings was nominated for BOTH Best Visual Effects AND Best Animated Feature. So, clearly, they are eligible. PLUS, in the Visual Effects Society Awards, an award show VOTED ON by visual effects artists, The Lion King WON 3 awards, including the top prize (Outstanding Visual Effects in a Photoreal Feature), whereas 1917 couldn't even win the only category it was nominated for (Outstanding Supporting Visual Effects in a Photoreal Feature, which went to The Irishman)! This was the biggest snub I've seen in my life.
As breathtaking as the Lion King looked, I knew it was never going to win. Because the Academy does not only base it off of what looks the best... that’s only half of it. On the official Academy site, they say they “consider the contribution the visual effects make to the overall production” and “the artistry, skill and fidelity with which the visual illusions are achieved”. You know why many critics hated the Lion King? Because many thought it was pointless to remake the film with CGI. They thought the CGI limited the display of the animals emotions, and that hurt the film a LOT. Therefore, it could never win, no matter how good it actually looked. Because while it does look great, it doesn’t satisfy the first rule, which many people forget.
Okay agreed valid points. But, 1917 had the ability to immerse the audience into those vfx journeys which actually relied on reality and also provided a sense of engagement like the audience were themselves a third man. Sorry to say but none the other nominees could do that. They were all brilliant movies no doubt. But 1917 is a simply a masterpiece. Like for explanation there is a scene where a plane crashes into a field with the two soldiers present watching the dogfight and their (vfx team) ability to achieve something like that in a sort of never ending shot is quite impressive. And that is why they deserved an oscar.
I think they didn't give the award to the lion king because it's very similar to "the jungle book" (by the way it's the same director) and that movie had already won in 2017, also because 1917 was one of the favorite movies to be most awarded
You know nothing about movies then; watch the behind the scenes features of 1917, there actually was hardly any shots in that film that weren't massively touched up digitally, so the VFX works were in fact the exact opposite of minimal. You're also mad if you thought that The Lion King looked completely photorealistic.
@@heisen-bones Yeah, I was just venting. A lot of great movies get snubbed but they'll nominate Star Wars no matter what, lol. It is what it is though.
1917 was possibly the least deserving nominee. I’m tired of this narration that “Practical effects are ALWAYS better”. What made 1917 look so great was the incredible cinematography and set design. What was special about the VFX. They stitched a bunch of scenes together? Films have done that before and those weren’t nominated for VFX? The practical explosions? Dunkirk did that and had way more, and that wasn’t even nominated. People think if you wanted Endgame you are a “kid” but in my opinion Endgame used way more elements of VFX to their advantage such as general use of CGI, de-aging, motion capture, CGI body doubles, practical effects, etc. The Portals scene was a masterwork in VFX, and i’m tired of people saying it’s not as good as 1917 because that film looks more “practical”. I’m sorry, we constantly want to advance in the film industry, why are we still rewarding the old techniques such as that? 1917 VFX-wise doesn’t look any better than a high regarded war film that came out 20 years ago. Where’s the innovation?
It has the most challenging VFX for them all. Marvel has us with a high level of quality and they maintain it. Disney with the remake of the lion king continue with the techniques used on "The jungle Book" (the only revolutionary thing was the VR stuff but that would have gone more into cinematography). The irishman is an incredible work but it is not well accomplished because you have other movies recreating the whole actor and here you have the 70/80 year old body of de niro and the 20/30 year old face and that threw a lot of spectators Into the uncanny valley. And The Rise of Skywalker is the weakest star wars of the trilogy in a VFX perspective (even the mandalorian had better ones being a tv show)
@@lilsebastian2209 You obviously thought the only VFX in 1917 was stitching of the scenes. That means they definitely deserved that win because you can't even tell which was CGI anymore. And yes, a lot of them were CGI, some of the corpses were, the burning building was, there was removal of anything in the background they didn't want, and more.
azazel_ 2100 Okay but there’s also so much in Endgame that is CGI that you can’t tell is CGI. Literally half the people in the final battle were CGI doubles. Most shots of the Avengers building looks completely real but it was never built. That seems a little harder than some CG corpses. There are multiple VFX breakdowns of Endgame on youtube, but I can’t find one on 1917... If there’s “so much” that was VFX that they hid from us, why aren’t they releasing that and showing us after it’s win?
The effects in Avengers are good but it does not offer any new solutions when it comes to the process of creating vfx. We've seen it all in previous Marvel movies. We only have greenscreen and motion capture here. I don't like the new Lion King but it had much better vfx than Endgame. The accuracy in creating CGI animals is amazing. These lions were not motion capture, it was an animation created from the beginning using a computer without actors. Even visual effects society awarded the Lion King instead of the Avengers. This means that Endgame should not win. 1917 combines practical effects with CGI. Here the task was even more difficult, because the film was made to look like a master shot and applying practical special effects in such long scenes without cuts is very difficult. We have real explosions and pyrotechnics here. CGI is so great that you can't distinguish it from real elements. For example, in the scene of a blazing city, some of the production design was created by computer. The rats were also not real, they were whole CGI. So 1917 definitely deserved to win.
Not to sound like a total superhero fan boy, but Endgame just completely deserved to win, say what you want about the movie, but it is an absolute visual masterpiece. Everything in that movie looked practically perfect, I've only heard of one flaw and you wouldn't even notice it at first glance if you weren't paying attention. I don;t think many of you seem to understand why Endgame is as good as it was, the colors used were amazing everything looked extremely realistic, Thanos is probably the best looking CGI character I have ever seen, the pours and other imperfections in his skin made to replicate how peoples faces work in real life,. A lot of hard work went into that movie that far outshines any other movie that came out in recent times. I also believe Godzilla King of the Monsters deserved at the very least a nomination, that movie LOOKED amazing. It is honestly confirmed at this point that the academy is biased towards these superhero kaiju movies.
LMAO, the best visual effects are those you don't see. Why should people be impressed when it's so obvious visual effects have been used? That's like being impressed by a magician when you know how he performs his tricks
I can understand why Endgame didn't win that award for VFX. I'm a Marvel fan, but honestly, I'm not a big fan of this movie (BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN I'M A DC FANBOY WHO HATES MARVEL! I'M A FAN OF BOTH OF THEM! I MEAN SPIDER-MAN AND BATMAN ARE MY FAVORITES). It's not even one of the best films ever or the best films of the decade. For one thing, the pacing is horrible, the story felt bland, the time travel subplot felt rushed (Unlike those of REAL PROFESSIONAL SCI FI FILMS LIKE BACK TO THE FUTURE AND TERMINATOR), and some of the characters haven't been given proper development like Hulk and Thor (I understand why they want to make Thor fat, to make him look depressed. But he is more of a comic relief drunk instead of a ACTUAL DEPRESSED PERSON like Peter B. Parker from Spider Verse). The acting is good, but the VFX are kind of average. Its not even one of the best MCU films, cause it has a lot of flaws that kept it from being perfect. My favorite MCU films are The Avengers and Infinity War. BUT DOES NOT MEAN I'M A DC FANBOY ONCE AGAIN! I'M FAN OF BOTH! ruclips.net/video/m8VU2GwkBtY/видео.html And of course, do you know what movies won the Best VFX Oscar? Alien, Aliens, Star Wars, The Abyss, T2, AND JURASSIC PARK! You know why they won these awards? 1. Alien won it because it was revolutionary in the sci-fi genre in which it introduces one of the coolest monster designs in film history. 2. Aliens introduced one of the largest animatronics ever put in film. 3. Star Wars had groundbreaking practical effects that revolutionized the sci-fi genre. 4. The Abyss had groundbreaking CGI for the pseudopod. 5. Terminator 2 had groundbreaking CGI and practical effects for the T-1000 and the T-800. 6. Jurassic Park had groundbreaking CGI and practical effects for the dinosaurs. That's exactly why these movies won these awards because they have something that Endgame lacks. Groundbreaking FX. These are old movies but they STILL HAVE BEST SPECIAL EFFECTS OF ALL TIME THAT IT EVEN PUTS MODERN VFX INCLUDING AVENGERS: ENDGAME'S TO SHAME! ruclips.net/video/quTj0DApqtA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/M6R5w_odGEo/видео.html ruclips.net/video/_rlr3Lzvqog/видео.html
I'm not saying Endgame is a bad movie. I'm just saying that it didn't offer anything new in the VFX and filmmaking category unlike T2 and Jurassic Park.
This is was NOT deserved! Avengers Endgame should have won out of these. Also WHY WAS SPIDERMAN FAR FROM HOME NOT NOMINATED?!?! THE MAIN VILLAIN IS A GUY WHO TRICKED THE WORLD WITH AFFECTS AND SOMEHOW IT WASN’T EVEN NOMINATED
Chuck Chumbucket How is de-aging new technology. The Curious Case is Benjamin Button won best visual effects for de-aging, and multiple Marvel films have used it. Hell, Captain Marvel flawlessly de-aged Samuel L Jackson for the whole movie, and that had massive space battles as well.
@@andrewgiordano6880 Not to the degree that "The Irishman" did. A new technology was developed so they could deage De Niro, Pacino, Pesci and whoever else required it without needing tracking dots or multiple cameras.
@@andrewgiordano6880 It's a new way to do it that doesn't interfere with how the film is shot. You can bitch and moan about it all you want, but "The Irishman" did something new that will alter how deaging is achieved in films nowadays. Oh, not to mention the deaging makes up practically the whole film and not short or extended sequences the way MCU movies do it.
@Sean Avery No because 1917 is real visual effects not Endgame because the Oscars don't like superhero movies 1917 is better than Endgame because your prediction is not right is wrong 1917 NUMBER ONE BEST MOVIE OF 2019 1917 is my favorite winners Oscars best vfx forever and I am very happy
I hated The Lion King 2019 but we have to admit it , it has one of the best visual effects we ever seen in a movie Sorry but the winner in this category is The Lion King
@@57yearoldjamesbond they made emotionless to be more realistic Don't get me wrong , it sucked but they made for a reason emotionless lions Sorry but the CG in that movie was perfect, the only one thing good
@Diego Pisfil and you're the fucking single digit IQ ignoramus who thinks the world revolves around him & anyone who disagrees with him is stupid. Get a life buddy, seriously
They shouldn’t have been making fun of the visual effects artists. The blame for the hideous visuals rests mostly on the production design and director. It really must have sucked being a CG artist on Cats having to meticulously work on this terrible looking film and not being able to fix it, only for everyone to blame your department.
@Diego Pisfil For me DC: Wonder Woman, The Lego Batman Movie, The Dark Knight and Joker Marvel: Endgame, Infinity War, Black Panther, Doctor Strange, Guardians of the Galaxy, Spider-Man 2, Spider-Man Into the Spider-Verse, Logan and Deadpool
@@ronaldmcdonald2817 Maybe you're the only person that criticzed it. But not from the critics and other audiences, all the visual effects in that movie were wildly praised and the rats weren't even CGI. They used trained rats actors, British have that according to the actors. Endgame's CGI was more noticeable than 1917, are you on crack or something??? 1917 used CGI to make the entire film look like one shot from start to finish, that wasn't noticeable and the CGI was invisible at all, that's where they won till the movie itself was nominated for Best Picture Man, you're just mad af that Endgame lost, go cry about it Marvel fanboy 😂😂😂
The moment I saw James and Rebel come in, I just said "Oh, my God..."
Atleast they are in costume rather than that crappy Visual Effect In The Movir .
@@m.syauqiabdurahman2798 that is strangely true
Me too
Somewhere in the crowd Martin Scorsese is glad that endgame didn't win 😂
@Geralt of Trivia I'll toss a coin to you witcher
happy when you want Martin Scorsese sooner or later in the next film about Avengers or Avengers 5 will win the first Oscar Statuette in the future so you will see your next reaction when you see that Avengers 5 will win the Oscars.
Martin scorses is glad that BLACK PANTHER dind t win for Oscar.
Fuck black panther e Martin Scorsese
@Carlitos Freaking Burn It Down endshit alongside the marvel shit universe better known as the msu movies are garbage.
@Carlitos Freaking Burn It Down Actually, the highest grossing film of all times is Gone With The Wind, not Avengers Endgame
@@NP-vn8so even then, money doesn't matter. Even godawful garbage like Transformers & venom earn more than $700M.
"The Best Visual Effects are the ones you couldn't noticed."
1917 is a Masterclass in that!!!!
The first war film to be nominated for the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects in nearly 50 years. The last war films to be nominated were Patton and Tora! Tora! Tora!, with the latter film taking the prize.
@@jwelch5742 you're wrong, in 2002 the war film "Pearl Harbor" was also nominated for best visual effects and even though the movie "Forrest Gump" is not a 100% war movie, it does have war elements and it was nominated and won best visual effects as well
How about Captain Vs captain, the travel suit, carol's fake hair, space ship scene, time machine, Howard stark,
1917🤩🤩>>>Black Panther 🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕💩💩💩💩
What about ready player one
The Visual Effects of 1917 are so great i couldn't even tell you what was a visual effect or practical. SO deserved.
Spider-Man:Across the Spider-Verse (2023) >>>>>> 1917 by Sam Mendes
@@carlosatausupa8429 Love 1917 but agree. Hope it gets nominated for Picture.
@@louisberry4403 ba... for 1917. I suffered for more than 4 years that a cinecomic film turned out to be one of the best cinecomics of Marvel/Sony, no one underestimates Spider-Verse until it has won an Oscar. (that is, what I want is revenge against the critics who are against Marvel films)
@@carlosatausupa8429 Across The Spider-Verse is amazing. Also hope Dead Reckoning Part I gets nominated for Best Picture.
The cringe is strong with the Cats sketch
Go watch the maya rudolph and Kristen wiig sketch at the oscars to see what’s really cringe
How was this cringe!? Maya Rudolph is...
Nothing like throwing the visual effects artists under the bus for bad filmmaking decisions.
*First time the biggest film of all time went home with no Oscars*
1917 deserved it, though
@Diego Pisfil just because he gets it one year doesn't mean he can't deserve it another year.
Technically, The Birth of a Nation was the biggest film of the time, but the Oscars weren't a thing back then.
The first movie politicy corrent no Oscar black panther.
1917 desverved ot thought.
Marvel Studios you're as suck. What that you dong Avengers Endgame is snubbed.
@Diego Pisfil the irishman destroyed BLACK PANTHER and 1917. Not endgame.
@Diego Pisfil BLACK PANTHER is trash.
The vfx is so good... you can’t even see it on the movie
That is the magic of visual effects
I didn't even know they used visual effects in the movie, I though they build the whole thing. Anyway they deserved to win, way better VFX than Endgame and The Rise of Skywalker
@@Erasureeraser Endgame VFX for the last battle was shit , attractive for kids but nah not beutiful at all
1917 is amazing
1917 is probably one of my favorite winners of this category alongside Blade Runner 2049 and First Man. VFX are not only about making Iron Man fly or how many pixels and triangles the Hulk has.
Yes true Phantom Thief
@Diego Pisfil No. Rise of the Planet of the Apes is real winner and deserves more to win visual effects Oscars 2012
It's awesome how 1917 and Blade Runner 2049 won visual effects and cinematography, the latter both going to Roger Deakins.
Yes 1917 was good but still endgame by VFX was far more superior than 1917
Across The Spider-verse:What did you say?
Beautifully shot movie...got goosebumps watching it
@Diego Pisfil No, it was better than the Irishman
@Diego Pisfil 1917 created more of an impact as a movie with the storyline and its depiction than the Irishman (which is also a good movie nevertheless).
goddamn, when they were yanking the mic, it felt like an eternity
Cats (2019) is visually repulsive, but this is what I like about James Corden and Rebel Wilson. They are not afraid to laugh at themselves, and sure as hell give us entertainment all the way!
1917 was a masterpiece
SPIDERVERSE 2: ................................................................................................
Alita: Battle Angel should’ve been nominated
Brandon Mauldin Same for Detective Pikachu
What would you not have nominated in its place?
Vits Vicente Torres That’s kinda hard to decide. Since Endgame absolutely deserved the nomination. And I haven’t seen 1917 or The Irishman so I can’t say for sure if they deserved it or not. I’m just surprised that Alita didn’t get nominated, I thought it would for sure
Reginald Wilson I can agree Ad Astra would be great choice for a nominee. I haven’t seen the movie but from the trailers the effects are amazing
@Vits Vicente Torres For me, it would easily be Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker. I mean, I get it that Star Wars has revolutionary visuals since A New Hope was considered to be a game changers. But the visuals in TROS looked so underwhelming to me. Compared to the planets in the original and even the sequel trilogy, the represented planets in TROS do not look fun to be in at all. A lot of areas around the movie look really dead. And the CGI of the creatures looked very poor. Even Palpatine’s CGI was a huge downgrade from both ROTJ and ROTS. But that’s just me. I know some poeple liked TROS visuals. It doesn’t look that bad, but yeah Alita or even Ad Astra were more worthy nominees than TROS.
Here is a fun fact
Dominic tuohy is actually the father of a a special help teacher in my school.
This... This is just insulting. If I were Jeremy from CinemaSins I would give you one thousand sins for even thinking of reminding us of that abomination Cats movie.
*DING!*
I think we all deserve a public apology from James Corden and Rebel Wilson for this.
The Irishman should've won, at least one
Considering it got 10 nominations
@Cliff Booth Its weird how this was where it had the best shot of winning anything. The only guild to award it was the VFX Society.
Should've won the Best Edition.
No, it should have won for Best Film Editing.
In my opinion The Irishman was a clear best editing pick but aperrently not, editing shortened out that runtime from 3 and a half hours to 2 hours you have to respect that.
@Diego Pisfil Hugo has great visual effects than Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2 and The Academy voters has the opinion and so do I.
Hell yeah we got ourselves some 1917 awards man WOOHOO
@Diego Pisfil pack your bags. We're gonna find out who asked.
Let's ignore the _Cats_ sketch and talk about why _1917_ deserved this award. When I first saw this film, I refused to believe that any CGI was used at all save for a few touches and anything that couldn't be done with live humans (E.G. the waterfall scene). It was only after I looked up the visual effects reel that I realized how much was used... but at the same time, it does something that most photorealistic CGI these days fails to achieve.
In more effects-heavy films like _The Lion King_ and _Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker,_ it's gorgeous to look at, even though you know none of it is. In _1917,_ I was fooled and believed all of it was real - the burning building, the fog around No Man's Land, and so on and so forth - and despite all the CGI, it actually made the experience feel that real. It's unusual for the Academy to recognize such raw, subtle, and unusual brilliance when they see it, so let's savor it (then again, they gave Best Picture to _Parasite,_ so I guess this wasn't the only category in which they recognized this type of genius).
2:45 😍😍 George
1:35 The one on the left looked sort of disappointed, couldn't imagine why...
Single guy😂😂😂
I would've replace The Irishman with Godzilla: KOTM
The fact that Alita: Battle Angel HASN'T been nominated for an oscar is sooo unclear to me
imagine doctor strange was released on 2020 i couldn't imagine doctor strange wouldn't win
I mean, it didn't win the year it was nominated either
It was nominated for Visual Effects in 2017 but it didn't win anyways
Godzilla: KOTM deserved a Nomination, goddammit!
(Seriously, how is it the Academy keeps recognizing Kong, of all Monsters???)
It's alright. The Academy isn't much of a big fan of monster movies, (Except for Alien, Jaws, The Exorcist, so on and so forth.) Hell, the first King Kong wasn't even nominated for anything during 1934. I know the film came out in 1933, but keep in mind, the Oscars are held to nominate films that came out one year after the film was actually released. But now, they have a tad bit of a soft side, as they nominated Kong: Skull Island for Best Visual Effects, and honored Haruo Nakajima (the actor for Godzilla) during the 90th Oscars Memoriam.
@@0807jacob Yeah. Not only that, but BOTH Remakes of Kong (1976, 2005) got Oscars for VFX. So, my gripe is, they're willing to acknowledge Giant Gorillas, but not Radioactive Lizards?
@@OddOneOut665 I get that. I am a Godzilla fan too. However, you are admittedly stuck in the present, where Godzilla is praised as one of the best movies of all time. You need to understand the past. You see, Godzilla is not as successful in America as it is in Japan. The first Godzilla film, Gojira, was released at what may be one of the worst times in human history. As a result, America censored Godzilla, which made the film's reputation grow rotten. As a result, the more films were released, the more cheesy America presented them. Even one of the best of the Godzilla films, Shin Godzilla, was mixed in America. King of the Monsters was also not successful in critical terms and box office. Meanwhile, King Kong is frequently cited as one of the most important American films of all time. This is why the Academy prefers King Kong over Godzilla.
But don't worry. There's an Academy in Japan, and gave Shin Godzilla the big one. Actually, 7 big ones. America wishes that movies like Shin Godzilla can win Best Picture, Best Director, Cinematography, Art Direction, Lighting Direction, Sound Recording, and Film Editing.
Black panther desrved for nomination oscar best visual Effects not Endgame.
Ooooooh avete rotte le scatole PORCA PU########
FA##### BLACK PANTHER E LA POLITICA CORRENT
Why wasn't cats nominated for its visual effects
That’s sarcasm right
Yeah it should've won best picture smh
how can we take their speeches seriously when there are two people dressed as cats standing behind them
1917 shows us how old VFX are used in new movies.
@Diego Pisfil the Irishman is a good movie, but it had horrible vfx. Nope, 1917 had the upper hand here.
@Diego Pisfil you clearly have garbage taste in VFX if you don't see how 1917 should win. Why don't you try making a movie which looks like it was made in one shot? I challenge you. And I'll present you an oscar if it's half as good as 1917 or birdman was.
@Diego Pisfil and the Irishman did? In terms of VFX?
@Diego Pisfil Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 😂
If you say that Endgame should have won you know nothing about visual effects techniques. The effects in Avengers are good but it's just CGI This movie does not offer any new solutions when it comes to the process of creating vfx. We've seen it all in previous Marvel movies. We only have greenscreen and motion capture here. I don't like the new Lion King and we also only have computer effects here. But I have to admit that the accuracy in creating CGI animals is amazing. These lions were not motion capture, it was an animation created from the beginning using a computer without actors. The realism of movement and appearance of animals is very impressive. But Robert Legato won 3 years ago for a very similar type of effects in the Jungle Book, so I understand he didn't win now. 1917 combines practical effects with CGI. And as we know, even the smallest practical effects are better than the large ones created by computer. Here the task was even more difficult, because the film was made to look like a master shot and applying practical special effects in such long scenes without cuts is very difficult. We have real explosions and pyrotechnics here. CGI is so great that you can't distinguish it from real elements. For example, in the scene of a blazing city, some parts of the production design were created by computer. The rats were also not real, they were whole CGI. So 1917 definitely deserved to win.
@Diego Pisfil what
A bloody deepfack is batter than irishman
@Diego Pisfil and the Irishman did? The digital de-aging trope has been around for a lot longer. So guess what? Even the Irishman brought nothing new to the table. What's your argument now?
Great summary. Endgame’s effects were obviously incredible but it was not revolutionary or that special.
Do you think you and your fucking favourite members of oscar academy is sooo much talented than the people of the whole world...!!!The income of YOUR favourite 1917 is Only $ 383 million which is almost equal to the cost of Marvel's endgame.😆😆😅.Do you know whats it's gross total income???its $2.79 billion....you idiot
@@troublemaker3587 so what? Money is not synonymous with quality. Even garbage like Venom, Suicide Squad & Transformers earned shit ton of money, does that make it good? Fuck outta here marvel fanboy
I think 1917 absolutely should have won.
@Diego Pisfil SHUT UP
Miles Morales:AHahahahaha.
(Spider-man:Across the Spider-Verse 2023)
them dressing up as their cats characters are just a cringe fest i would’ve walked out of there for a drink but 1917’s win was well deserved
El momento en que le robaron el Oscar a avengers
ohjala espero que Across the Spider-verse gli tia una cajetare a 1917 por aber robato el oscar a Avengers:Endgame en el proximo Oscar 2024.
Nominees for Visual Effects:
0:27 Avengers: Endgame
0:34 The Irishman
0:43 The Lion King
0:51 1917
0:56 Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
WINNER: 1917
1. 1917
2. The Irishman
3. Avengers: Endgame
4. The Lion King
5. Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker
Irishman what
@@dariussalepetru6770 no tie, 1917 was better
@@Erasureeraser Ok here of my ranking best VFX
1 1917
2 The Irishman
3 The Lion King
4 Avengers Endgame
5 Star Wars The Rise of Skywalker
In Hollywood, Fat = Funny
People in the comment section saying Endgame deserved it when even The Lion King would've been a better choice.
No, "Endgame" was more deserving than "The Lion King". "The Lion King" was ambitious but lacked the heart of Favreau's earlier Disney redo. But still, this should have been the one category "The Irishman" should have won.
@Diego Pisfil My nominees should be
❤ Avengers Endgame
❤ The Lion King
❤ *THE IRISHMAN (WINNER)*
❤ 1917
❤ Alita Battle Angel
@@AngelofMusic04 lol, why are bitching about the whole Lion King movies .. Lion King VFX is great and in facts they made in VR is really something new and it is an achevements
I love 1917, but I can not believe Ad Astra were snubbed
I mean, every film about space exploration deserve this awards
Don't mind me I'm just here to read salty marvel fanboy comments 😂😂😂
Endgame should have won. 1917 is a better movie but the visual effects are pretty bad.
@@ronaldmcdonald2817 nope, 1917's VFX are way better than Endgame. More realistic, unnoticeable and not overused unlike Endgame. Also Endgame had the same amount of CGI as previous Marvel movies, nothing special about it anymore, they also overused CGI in some scenes and the effects are noticeable. The Academy rather look at visual effects that are realistic, unnoticeable and not overused. Tbh, I didn't even know 1917 used VFX, I thought they build the whole set.
"1917 is a better movie but the visual effects are bad"
Lmao, watch 1917 again bruh, the visual effects in that movie was way incredible and way realistic. Like the 1917 VFX team said "The Visual Effects is something you couldn't noticed" and that's for 1917, the visual effects in that movie are unnoticeable not like Endgame
1917 deserved to win, not Endgame. Stop being salty you Marvel fanboy!!
I can't believe how stupid you are, calling a better movie but the visual effects are bad 😂😂😂. Someone didn't paid close attention enough to 1917
@@Erasureeraser
First of all. The VFX in 1917 are pretty noticeable. The CGI rats look terrible same with burning Church.
Second: Avengers Endgame created one of the best CGI characters of all time with Thanos. The VFX were praised by critics while 1917s weren’t.
Third: paying attention to the VFX would make them worse.
Fourth: I’m not a marvel fanboy for thinking Endgame should have won. Going straight to insults is immature and Sad.
@@ronaldmcdonald2817 have u ever seen 1917 lmao Visual effects ar far beutiful and better than endgame fanshit show
@@jyothis.n629 1917’s VFX are not very good. The CG rats look pretty fake and the burning Church also looks a little bit fake. Endgame has terrific VFX and Thanos is one of the best CG characters ever.
It was beautifully made
I was so into it ,I thought I was watching Short film 🎥
I wanted to see more of that 💗
How I’d rank the VFX in these films:
1. 1917
2. The Lion King
3. The Irishman
4. Avengers: Endgame
5. Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
IMO Godzilla KOTM deserved at least a nomination
Ok, stop crying, Marvel fans. I love Endgame as much as the next person and its visuals are great but we’ve seen them in every single MCU movie before. It’s nothing very special.
Same like Star Wars too, the VFX aren't even that special anymore, because we've seen that in the previous movied
@@Erasureeraser, yep. Both Endgame and Rise of Skywalker have near flawless effects but it’s something we’ve seen 2000 times already. The effects in 1917 however look so real it’s hard to believe it’s CGI unlike RoS and Endgame where it’s obvious CGI was used even if it’s great CGI
1 1917
2 The Irishman
3 The Lion King
4 Endgame
5 Star Wars The Rise of Skywalker
1917 was the first war film in 50 years to win the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects. The last one was Tora! Tora! Tora! in 1970
I've said it before and I'm saying it again; take that, MCU kiddos!
1917
has great visual effects.
@@dariussalepetru9951 The Academy voters has the opinion and so do I because I never disagreed with them. They're always right. People should agreed with the Academy voters opinions like me.
@@jwelch5742 just as I thought. jwelch5742; The man who dickrides the academy. But in this case I have to agree that 1917 was the best choice. They had combined practical effects with cgi and half of the stuff wasn't even real. But they made it sooo well that we wouldn't notice it was cgi. The rats scene was completely computer generated. Some of the big explosions were practical and cgi. Unique win well deserved!!
Avengers endgame deserved it just for the portals scene and the seamless time travel quantum suits.
1917 was also good but I wanted endgame to win so much
Stfu marvel turd... Endlame didn't deserve even a nomination alita and Godzilla both had way better effects also ad astra
You Marvel kids are so silly, thinking Marvel should win anything. All marvel movies are the same, and their effects too.
@@Denis-89 Yes the CGI in marvel movies are the best all the time. You're right
Denis
You know Marvel isn’t for specifically for kids right? Kids alone wouldn’t allow it to become the highest grossing film of all time.
Endgame was a breathtaking achievement in filmmaking whether you want to admit it or not. I don’t care if you don’t like the movie, that’s fine by me. But can’t deny it’s achievements. It got amazing reviews from ADULT critics. It was nominated for multiple Visual Effects Society awards. It should have won in my opinion because it combined many different elements of VFX such as CGI, practical effects, de-aging, motion capture, hundreds of CGI body doubles, etc. While 1917 looked amazing, I didn’t think that was because of the VFX. The cinematography and production design was special in that film, NOT the VFX. I have yet to find a VFX breakdown of 1917 on youtube other than George MacKay jumping into the river. I read that one of the VFX artists most challenging work was “adding mist into No Mans Land”. Uh okay? Big budget films like Endgame do that shit all the time when they composite their big action set pieces. 1917 is the most disappointing VFX win in the past 10 years, tell me i’m wrong.
Diego Pisfil
That didn’t relate to anything I said but go off i guess
Good thing Lion King didn't win this and I hate to say this but after wining this award while also being nominated for Rise of Skywalker, Dominic Tuohy may get an Oscar nomination for Best Visual Effects for Dolittle despite the reviews.
Shut up, Lion King should've won
Cats intro is the best 😆
Ad astra should’ve been nominated and won tbh.
Won? No
nomination? Yes
Interstellar did it first
What would you not have nominated in its place?
Vits Vicente Torres probably rise of skywalker the young Luke and Leia Cgi was pretty terrible
Deserved
@DARIUS-PETRU SALE No Endgame didn't deserved to win, the VFX aren't that special anymore, 1917 deserved it because the VFX wasn't noticed in the film, they deserved to win.
Yeah, great idea to have the 2 actors in “Cats” (2019) that gave the worst performances present the award for Best Visual Effects dressed and acting like cats..... NOT!
Martin Scorsese: oh thank god
"The best visual effects are the ones you didn't notice."
Tell that to someone who have already watched 1917 but still think it didn't deserved to win
Oscars have made this category a joke due to the so called authenticity and practicality in movies
@Diego Pisfil dude 1917's vfx are almost impossible to notice
@@arthur9491 he's just a closeted marvel fanboy lol fuck him
1917 has great visual effects. You don't have to be a CGIfest to have great visual effects.
The oscars took a stab at cats
If was a Crime Were Pokémon Detective Pikachu wasn’t nominated at Oscars 2020
The reason why Endgame lost is because there were some special effects that were beautiful to look at but you notice a lot that it is fake especially the CGI of Professor Hulk but there is not one without three 1917 really has some really beautiful but realistic special effects so 1917 has won for best special effects.
But if there is one thing that Sam Mendes' film deserves and I get slapped, it comes sooner rather than later.
*SPIDERMAN:ACROSS THE SPIDERVERSE*
Guillaume Rocheron is french ?
Because his english accent is...
__Anne Blythe__ With the name it wasn’t hard to catch😂😂 But yeah the accent is...😂 And as a french native speaker I can say that both the voice and the cats pronounced his name so wrong!! But it’s understandable of course!!
Ok so nobody is gonna talk about how james and rebel just whacked that microphone lmao
well I feel like lion king had deserved the Oscar as well 🤷🏻♀️
@Diego Pisfil keep crying bitch
@Diego Pisfilwhy should I, punk?
That was bullcrap. Regardless if you hated the movie, The Lion King is the most groundbreaking achievement we've had in visual effects! That entire film was an animated film that looked completely photorealistic, whereas 1917 had very minimal effects work, where most of the scenes with VFX shots barely looked any different from the before photos.
And anybody in the comments who tries to tell me that animated movies shouldn't be considered VFX, keep in mind that this has happened TWICE before. The Nightmare Before Christmas was nominated, and Kubo and the Two Strings was nominated for BOTH Best Visual Effects AND Best Animated Feature. So, clearly, they are eligible.
PLUS, in the Visual Effects Society Awards, an award show VOTED ON by visual effects artists, The Lion King WON 3 awards, including the top prize (Outstanding Visual Effects in a Photoreal Feature), whereas 1917 couldn't even win the only category it was nominated for (Outstanding Supporting Visual Effects in a Photoreal Feature, which went to The Irishman)!
This was the biggest snub I've seen in my life.
As breathtaking as the Lion King looked, I knew it was never going to win. Because the Academy does not only base it off of what looks the best... that’s only half of it. On the official Academy site, they say they “consider the contribution the visual effects make to the overall production” and “the artistry, skill and fidelity with which the visual illusions are achieved”. You know why many critics hated the Lion King? Because many thought it was pointless to remake the film with CGI. They thought the CGI limited the display of the animals emotions, and that hurt the film a LOT. Therefore, it could never win, no matter how good it actually looked. Because while it does look great, it doesn’t satisfy the first rule, which many people forget.
Okay agreed valid points.
But, 1917 had the ability to immerse the audience into those vfx journeys which actually relied on reality and also provided a sense of engagement like the audience were themselves a third man. Sorry to say but none the other nominees could do that. They were all brilliant movies no doubt. But 1917 is a simply a masterpiece. Like for explanation there is a scene where a plane crashes into a field with the two soldiers present watching the dogfight and their (vfx team) ability to achieve something like that in a sort of never ending shot is quite impressive.
And that is why they deserved an oscar.
I think they didn't give the award to the lion king because it's very similar to "the jungle book" (by the way it's the same director) and that movie had already won in 2017, also because 1917 was one of the favorite movies to be most awarded
You know nothing about movies then; watch the behind the scenes features of 1917, there actually was hardly any shots in that film that weren't massively touched up digitally, so the VFX works were in fact the exact opposite of minimal.
You're also mad if you thought that The Lion King looked completely photorealistic.
@Reginald Wilson what another thing did you dream?
I guess they nominated Star Wars.. because it's Star Wars, lmfao.
Every single star wars movie since 2015 was nominated for at least one oscar, mostly technical ones
@@heisen-bones Yeah, I was just venting. A lot of great movies get snubbed but they'll nominate Star Wars no matter what, lol. It is what it is though.
@@h.b.smith_writer yeah but they got cool VFX tho, especially rogue one.
Hunter Smith I mean it had amazing VFX
@@nico-v113 yeah it's not like they were nominated for best screenplay or something
0:21 how the hell is that woman cringing? Her award introduction with was the CRINGIEST thing of the night
What is the song of the annoucement ?
Engländer by Thomas Newman from the 1917 score soundtrack
@@rasharddavis321 Thank you !
1917 was possibly the least deserving nominee. I’m tired of this narration that “Practical effects are ALWAYS better”. What made 1917 look so great was the incredible cinematography and set design. What was special about the VFX. They stitched a bunch of scenes together? Films have done that before and those weren’t nominated for VFX? The practical explosions? Dunkirk did that and had way more, and that wasn’t even nominated.
People think if you wanted Endgame you are a “kid” but in my opinion Endgame used way more elements of VFX to their advantage such as general use of CGI, de-aging, motion capture, CGI body doubles, practical effects, etc. The Portals scene was a masterwork in VFX, and i’m tired of people saying it’s not as good as 1917 because that film looks more “practical”. I’m sorry, we constantly want to advance in the film industry, why are we still rewarding the old techniques such as that? 1917 VFX-wise doesn’t look any better than a high regarded war film that came out 20 years ago. Where’s the innovation?
It has the most challenging VFX for them all. Marvel has us with a high level of quality and they maintain it. Disney with the remake of the lion king continue with the techniques used on "The jungle Book" (the only revolutionary thing was the VR stuff but that would have gone more into cinematography). The irishman is an incredible work but it is not well accomplished because you have other movies recreating the whole actor and here you have the 70/80 year old body of de niro and the 20/30 year old face and that threw a lot of spectators Into the uncanny valley. And The Rise of Skywalker is the weakest star wars of the trilogy in a VFX perspective (even the mandalorian had better ones being a tv show)
@@lilsebastian2209 You obviously thought the only VFX in 1917 was stitching of the scenes. That means they definitely deserved that win because you can't even tell which was CGI anymore. And yes, a lot of them were CGI, some of the corpses were, the burning building was, there was removal of anything in the background they didn't want, and more.
azazel_ 2100
Okay but there’s also so much in Endgame that is CGI that you can’t tell is CGI. Literally half the people in the final battle were CGI doubles. Most shots of the Avengers building looks completely real but it was never built. That seems a little harder than some CG corpses. There are multiple VFX breakdowns of Endgame on youtube, but I can’t find one on 1917... If there’s “so much” that was VFX that they hid from us, why aren’t they releasing that and showing us after it’s win?
The effects in Avengers are good but it does not offer any new solutions when it comes to the process of creating vfx. We've seen it all in previous Marvel movies. We only have greenscreen and motion capture here. I don't like the new Lion King but it had much better vfx than Endgame. The accuracy in creating CGI animals is amazing. These lions were not motion capture, it was an animation created from the beginning using a computer without actors. Even visual effects society awarded the Lion King instead of the Avengers. This means that Endgame should not win. 1917 combines practical effects with CGI. Here the task was even more difficult, because the film was made to look like a master shot and applying practical special effects in such long scenes without cuts is very difficult. We have real explosions and pyrotechnics here. CGI is so great that you can't distinguish it from real elements. For example, in the scene of a blazing city, some of the production design was created by computer. The rats were also not real, they were whole CGI. So 1917 definitely deserved to win.
andrew giordano 🤮. The effects in endgame were noticeable as hell.
The only time James Corden and Rebel Wilson were funny and not horrifying in Cats, and it wasn't in the movie.
P.S. Congratulations 1917!!!
Not to sound like a total superhero fan boy, but Endgame just completely deserved to win, say what you want about the movie, but it is an absolute visual masterpiece. Everything in that movie looked practically perfect, I've only heard of one flaw and you wouldn't even notice it at first glance if you weren't paying attention. I don;t think many of you seem to understand why Endgame is as good as it was, the colors used were amazing everything looked extremely realistic, Thanos is probably the best looking CGI character I have ever seen, the pours and other imperfections in his skin made to replicate how peoples faces work in real life,. A lot of hard work went into that movie that far outshines any other movie that came out in recent times. I also believe Godzilla King of the Monsters deserved at the very least a nomination, that movie LOOKED amazing. It is honestly confirmed at this point that the academy is biased towards these superhero kaiju movies.
LMAO, the best visual effects are those you don't see. Why should people be impressed when it's so obvious visual effects have been used? That's like being impressed by a magician when you know how he performs his tricks
Also, this is Best Visual Effects, not Best Production Design
I can understand why Endgame didn't win that award for VFX. I'm a Marvel fan, but honestly, I'm not a big fan of this movie (BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN I'M A DC FANBOY WHO HATES MARVEL! I'M A FAN OF BOTH OF THEM! I MEAN SPIDER-MAN AND BATMAN ARE MY FAVORITES). It's not even one of the best films ever or the best films of the decade. For one thing, the pacing is horrible, the story felt bland, the time travel subplot felt rushed (Unlike those of REAL PROFESSIONAL SCI FI FILMS LIKE BACK TO THE FUTURE AND TERMINATOR), and some of the characters haven't been given proper development like Hulk and Thor (I understand why they want to make Thor fat, to make him look depressed. But he is more of a comic relief drunk instead of a ACTUAL DEPRESSED PERSON like Peter B. Parker from Spider Verse). The acting is good, but the VFX are kind of average. Its not even one of the best MCU films, cause it has a lot of flaws that kept it from being perfect. My favorite MCU films are The Avengers and Infinity War. BUT DOES NOT MEAN I'M A DC FANBOY ONCE AGAIN! I'M FAN OF BOTH!
ruclips.net/video/m8VU2GwkBtY/видео.html
And of course, do you know what movies won the Best VFX Oscar? Alien, Aliens, Star Wars, The Abyss, T2, AND JURASSIC PARK! You know why they won these awards?
1. Alien won it because it was revolutionary in the sci-fi genre in which it introduces one of the coolest monster designs in film history.
2. Aliens introduced one of the largest animatronics ever put in film.
3. Star Wars had groundbreaking practical effects that revolutionized the sci-fi genre.
4. The Abyss had groundbreaking CGI for the pseudopod.
5. Terminator 2 had groundbreaking CGI and practical effects for the T-1000 and the T-800.
6. Jurassic Park had groundbreaking CGI and practical effects for the dinosaurs.
That's exactly why these movies won these awards because they have something that Endgame lacks. Groundbreaking FX. These are old movies but they STILL HAVE BEST SPECIAL EFFECTS OF ALL TIME THAT IT EVEN PUTS MODERN VFX INCLUDING AVENGERS: ENDGAME'S TO SHAME!
ruclips.net/video/quTj0DApqtA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/M6R5w_odGEo/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/_rlr3Lzvqog/видео.html
I'm not saying Endgame is a bad movie. I'm just saying that it didn't offer anything new in the VFX and filmmaking category unlike T2 and Jurassic Park.
Endgame is trash you butthurt marveltard
I can’t believe it got award
1:The lion king
2:1917
3:Endgame
4:Star Wars 9
5:The Irishman
For me
1 1917
2 The Irishman
3 The Lion King
4 Endgame
5 Star Wars 9
Hey there, baby MARVEL fans🙂
We all should be thinking the lion king was the clear winner
Diego Pisfil it was just age visual effects, 1917 had barely any visual effects and the intire movie of the lion king is visual effects
@Diego Pisfil keep crying bitch
@Diego Pisfil My predictions Oscars 2021 Best Visual Effects:
🔴 Black Widow
🔴 *DUNE (WINNER)*
🔴 The Call of The Wild
🔴 Tenet
🔴 Top Gun: Maverick
@Diego Pisfil Yeah
@Diego Pisfil keep talking to the mirror, it's fun
1917 end the game of endgame
1:52
What happened to CATS?
I watched on shrooms and it was great
Endgame should've won.
It shouldn't have been even nominated.
No
@Diego Pisfil Nah, pick any 5 minutes of 1917, it will still be better than Avengers: Plothole in every single way.
1917 won alright? It is what it is
No, star wars should of won!
I really hate this category because of the fact that they never award marvel
The special effects are more than making iron man fly or antman get big
Keshav Batra The MCU may not have won yet, but at least Spider-Man 2 won.
Spiderman 2 wins VFX award for 2002 OSCAR
Marvel is fanservice garbage for people with no taste...
That's the reason I love the category :D
This is was NOT deserved! Avengers Endgame should have won out of these. Also WHY WAS SPIDERMAN FAR FROM HOME NOT NOMINATED?!?! THE MAIN VILLAIN IS A GUY WHO TRICKED THE WORLD WITH AFFECTS AND SOMEHOW IT WASN’T EVEN NOMINATED
Better luck next time lion king 🥺🥺🥺🥺 you will forever be my favorite Disney movie
Mine too
The animation is the best, the live action was just bland, dull and soulless
Avengers Endgame is magic
@Diego Pisfil certainly a great movie but VFX were better in avengers endgame
@Diego Pisfil but still has better vfx
@Diego Pisfil Yes the VFX in Logan were awesome but the portals scene totally got it
@Diego Pisfil Yeah you are right it could've replaced Irishmen
@Diego Pisfil like I said It is a great movie better than any nominaee but still endgame has better vfx
Endgame make 2,7 billion but not winning oscar
Getting a lot of money doesn't make your film good
By that logic, Transformers 4 made a billion dollars. Why didn't it win any Oscars?
@@heisen-bones well that because many people still liked transformer s or peoples laughing at Michael Bay's explosions
@@rifqiadiono753 yeah so why didn't it win any Oscars?
@@heisen-bones look it's academy they only nominated movie that considered for the greatest
Happy for 1917 poor Marvel and Disney
The most deserving movie was Alita
What would you not have nominated in its place?
@@VicenteTorresAliasVits Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
The Irishman should’ve won, it was pioneering new effects
Chuck Chumbucket How is de-aging new technology. The Curious Case is Benjamin Button won best visual effects for de-aging, and multiple Marvel films have used it. Hell, Captain Marvel flawlessly de-aged Samuel L Jackson for the whole movie, and that had massive space battles as well.
@@andrewgiordano6880 Not to the degree that "The Irishman" did. A new technology was developed so they could deage De Niro, Pacino, Pesci and whoever else required it without needing tracking dots or multiple cameras.
Will C EXACTLY!
Will C
Okay sure, it is a new way of accomplishing it, but at the end of the day it’s still de-aging.
@@andrewgiordano6880 It's a new way to do it that doesn't interfere with how the film is shot. You can bitch and moan about it all you want, but "The Irishman" did something new that will alter how deaging is achieved in films nowadays. Oh, not to mention the deaging makes up practically the whole film and not short or extended sequences the way MCU movies do it.
I was hoping the lion king would win. Those visual effects were breathtaking.
Wtf 2021 y sigo sin creer que no gano star wars o endgame
Because 1917 is the best
As long as not endgame
In terms of visual effects
Avengers Endgame totally killed it
Richard Lugali No normal cgi stuff in every superhero movies.
In terms of visual effects
1917 totally killed it!!
New VFX like Endgame and The lion king deserved this category
No neither of them deserved the Oscar
Wow what a joke. Oscars has always been a joke. Give it up for BOSS BABY!
The Lion King deserves too, well 1917 is also good.
What the hell????? why I don't win Avengers endgame?
@Sean Avery No because 1917 is real visual effects not Endgame because the Oscars don't like superhero movies
1917 is better than Endgame because your prediction is not right is wrong
1917 NUMBER ONE BEST MOVIE OF 2019
1917 is my favorite winners Oscars best vfx forever and I am very happy
@Diego Pisfil Oh shut up clown
@Diego Pisfil look at this clown
DaredevilZ Send In… The Clowns
Doesn’t deserve it sorry marvel fanboy. 1917 deserves it. One of my favourite films of all tome
The Lion King was sholled be win😭
or Endgame
@@saledarius9014 endgame has badder cgi than the lion king
@@rubenpasta6178 Agreed 1917 was better
I hated The Lion King 2019 but we have to admit it , it has one of the best visual effects we ever seen in a movie
Sorry but the winner in this category is The Lion King
The movie where emotionless CGI lions look green-screened into a CGI environment?
@@57yearoldjamesbond they made emotionless to be more realistic
Don't get me wrong , it sucked but they made for a reason emotionless lions
Sorry but the CG in that movie was perfect, the only one thing good
Well this award Is More deserved than First man award last year...🙄
No, "First Man" was more deserving, but at the same time, the VFX branch shat the bed last year by not nominating "Annihilation".
@Diego Pisfil stop that. You're not changing anyone's mind
@Diego Pisfil so what? It still deserved best cinematography
@Diego Pisfil no it didn't. Any other year probably, but not a chance against 1917
@Diego Pisfil you can either keep complaining or deal with it. No way you're changing anyone's mind no matter how hard you try. Get a fucking life.
1917 deserved it don't @me
@Diego Pisfil why don't you fuck off m8 your opinions are shite
@Diego Pisfil and you're the fucking single digit IQ ignoramus who thinks the world revolves around him & anyone who disagrees with him is stupid. Get a life buddy, seriously
@Diego Pisfil Yes
Diego Pisfil 1917 was better then the Irishman
@Diego Pisfil look! The kid learned how to say "fuck"... Still doesn't make your point any stronger.
So, did anyone else felt a bit bad for how much crap we gave Cats with that intro?
No. They deserve it.
They shouldn’t have been making fun of the visual effects artists. The blame for the hideous visuals rests mostly on the production design and director. It really must have sucked being a CG artist on Cats having to meticulously work on this terrible looking film and not being able to fix it, only for everyone to blame your department.
Haha cats, but I didn't watch cats and I'm glad jzz
تشکر از شما دوست عزیز امیدوارم که همیشه موفق باشید آره ممنونم
بله من با تیم شما هستم اگر خواستید
Shazam should have been there
No. Shazam’s effects are pretty bad.
Aw man, I wanted Endgame to win.
But, whatever, it doesn’t matter. At least Star Wars and Lion King didn’t win. 😂
MARVEL IS UTTER TRASH
Amen to that!
@Diego Pisfil What you favorite superhero movies in DC and Marvel?
@Diego Pisfil For me
DC: Wonder Woman, The Lego Batman Movie, The Dark Knight and Joker
Marvel: Endgame, Infinity War, Black Panther, Doctor Strange, Guardians of the Galaxy, Spider-Man 2, Spider-Man Into the Spider-Verse, Logan and Deadpool
@Diego Pisfil ironically they aren't MCU movies but yeah they are great
@@dariussalepetru9951 remove endgame and black panther and your list is perfect
Endgame deserved to win because of the portals scene
www.goldderby.com/article/2020/1917-visual-effects-oscar-predictions/
I truly agreed! That scene WAS AWESOME!
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHSHAHAHHA........no, a VFX is something that you couldn't noticed, Endgame was noticeable and 1917 wasn't
@@Erasureeraser but 1917’s were noticeable. The CG rats are criticized.
@@ronaldmcdonald2817 Maybe you're the only person that criticzed it. But not from the critics and other audiences, all the visual effects in that movie were wildly praised and the rats weren't even CGI. They used trained rats actors, British have that according to the actors. Endgame's CGI was more noticeable than 1917, are you on crack or something??? 1917 used CGI to make the entire film look like one shot from start to finish, that wasn't noticeable and the CGI was invisible at all, that's where they won till the movie itself was nominated for Best Picture
Man, you're just mad af that Endgame lost, go cry about it Marvel fanboy 😂😂😂