The animation is very good, but this guy's theory is strange, Titanic would never be able to reach an angle of 55 degrees, and Titanic didn't sink on an even keel. Edit:When I refer to the guy i dont mean dannydraws
If you think the physics of a banana are the same as steel then you must also think the physics of a toothpick are the same as the physics of my femur... Last I checked the force it takes to break a femur is SIGNIFICANTLY more than that of a toothpick. Also the Banana came out in the 2000s dumbass.
Anyone with a 7yo's understanding of physics and basic metallurgy... will know that Steel doesn't crumple like paper fucking mache nor would GRAVITY allow her ass to stick up that high in the air. Secondly, if one does some research they will find eyewitness accounts of survivors who saw it go down say there was an explosion and the lights were on as she went under. The only way to break her would be to blow her up. Interesting fact, salt is a key ingredient in explosions, it is also an accelerant. What happens when icy salt water hits coal bunkers I wonder? But hey I just read shit....
If it was an explosion that caused the break, then the boilers and the boiler rooms would have been destroyed. The accounts about an explosion most likely heard the sounds of failing as Titanic broke and accounts about a break, then the explosion would have been likely hearing the Second funnel falling and the Hull failing as Titanic would reach her maximum angle between 23-28 degrees. Sorry for any offence, no offence meant
The animation is very good, but this guy's theory is strange, Titanic would never be able to reach an angle of 55 degrees, and Titanic didn't sink on an even keel.
Edit:When I refer to the guy i dont mean dannydraws
That is a James Cameron 97 theory.
No it’s the theory shown at the Titanic Museum in Cobh, tho it is heavily based on the 1995 theory. With minor changes
If you think the physics of a banana are the same as steel then you must also think the physics of a toothpick are the same as the physics of my femur... Last I checked the force it takes to break a femur is SIGNIFICANTLY more than that of a toothpick. Also the Banana came out in the 2000s dumbass.
@@DannyDraws1912 but it look like
97 movie theory
Anyone with a 7yo's understanding of physics and basic metallurgy... will know that Steel doesn't crumple like paper fucking mache nor would GRAVITY allow her ass to stick up that high in the air.
Secondly, if one does some research they will find eyewitness accounts of survivors who saw it go down say there was an explosion and the lights were on as she went under.
The only way to break her would be to blow her up. Interesting fact, salt is a key ingredient in explosions, it is also an accelerant. What happens when icy salt water hits coal bunkers I wonder?
But hey I just read shit....
Are you saying it was an explosion caused the break up? It so you are very wrong
The RMS titanic,never would reach an angle of 55 degrees.She could reach an angle of 30-35 degrees I think.
@@karlthepro6991 that’s even to high, the max angle she could reach is roughly 28°
If it was an explosion that caused the break, then the boilers and the boiler rooms would have been destroyed. The accounts about an explosion most likely heard the sounds of failing as Titanic broke and accounts about a break, then the explosion would have been likely hearing the Second funnel falling and the Hull failing as Titanic would reach her maximum angle between 23-28 degrees. Sorry for any offence, no offence meant
@@DannyDraws1912yes sorry,I have improved my studies,the angle was 23-30 degrees,or 25-30
I'm sorry but 55 degrees?! I'm pretty sure if she did reach that high, everyone, and I mean EVERYONE would have seen her break in half
It’s not his theory
That is a Titanic 1997's Theory
Thats my ship
1995 James Cameron Theory
Its similar to the 1997 Movie