Yep. And yet claim we need even more surveillance to combat child abuse (i.e. Online Safety Bill). Not a valid reason for mass surveillance at all, though, I think.
Our US Constitution 4th Amendment is based upon English Common Law as of July 4th 1776. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Our US Supreme Court has perverted this Right over time. Basically if everyone's Rights are Violated Equally then the Plaintiff has No Standing to claim that his Rights have been Violated.. A Case in the 60's lowered the bar to a "Reasonable Expectation of Privacy." In a Case where a Mafioso would Call from a Pay Phone. The FIB asked the Phone Company, Bell Atlantic, to provide what phone number was called at a certain time. The Defendants complained that the evidence ought be dismissed as it was obtained without a Warrant. The Phone Company was considered by the Government as one of the parties of the phone call who could consent to voluntarily give information to the government. Also whereas the Amendment states that the government must have a Reason for the Warrant. Now the gov't states that Policy Enforcers can Search without a Warrant if they have a flimsy Reason. Every Amendment of Our US Constitution is Violated by Legislature Executive & Judicial. Every Constitutional Clause outlining the Limited & Enumerated Powers & Procedures are regularly disregarded. Article 1. Section 8, Delegates 18 Powers to the Federal Government. And only 9 of which are operational within a State. The People are confused where the US Constitution states; "To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;" They mistakenly think this Power is operational within the States of the Union.
I’m sorry. This is “me me me”. Why is it more serious that the collecting of mass information of politicians communications is more serious than mass collection of the communications of all of us.
Obviously, because politicians control us... we don't control politicians. Politicians have shown they must be monitored otherwise they have free reign to corrupt practices.
Always great stuff. Please keep making them
Free Julian Assange.
Fantastic video!
So they have the tools to go after the groomers and child molesters but choose not to
Yep. And yet claim we need even more surveillance to combat child abuse (i.e. Online Safety Bill). Not a valid reason for mass surveillance at all, though, I think.
Parliament Square 1pm Saturday 24th June - be there if you care.
Enlightening vid 👏🏻👏🏼👏🏽 🇬🇧
Our US Constitution 4th Amendment is based upon English Common Law as of July 4th 1776. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Our US Supreme Court has perverted this Right over time. Basically if everyone's Rights are Violated Equally then the Plaintiff has No Standing to claim that his Rights have been Violated.. A Case in the 60's lowered the bar to a "Reasonable Expectation of Privacy." In a Case where a Mafioso would Call from a Pay Phone. The FIB asked the Phone Company, Bell Atlantic, to provide what phone number was called at a certain time. The Defendants complained that the evidence ought be dismissed as it was obtained without a Warrant. The Phone Company was considered by the Government as one of the parties of the phone call who could consent to voluntarily give information to the government. Also whereas the Amendment states that the government must have a Reason for the Warrant. Now the gov't states that Policy Enforcers can Search without a Warrant if they have a flimsy Reason. Every Amendment of Our US Constitution is Violated by Legislature Executive & Judicial. Every Constitutional Clause outlining the Limited & Enumerated Powers & Procedures are regularly disregarded. Article 1. Section 8, Delegates 18 Powers to the Federal Government. And only 9 of which are operational within a State. The People are confused where the US Constitution states; "To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;" They mistakenly think this Power is operational within the States of the Union.
I’m sorry. This is “me me me”. Why is it more serious that the collecting of mass information of politicians communications is more serious than mass collection of the communications of all of us.
Obviously, because politicians control us... we don't control politicians. Politicians have shown they must be monitored otherwise they have free reign to corrupt practices.
Some of them were like that, I agree, not all though and nor is BBW.