Nebraska Attorney General bans retired teacher for seeking truth!!!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 34

  • @BLUELINEOFCORRUPTION
    @BLUELINEOFCORRUPTION 2 месяца назад +2

    The Attorney General doubles down on a lie when the truth could set them free.

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  2 месяца назад +2

      Look at my Supreme Court Writ. I haven't submitted it yet but it addresses that exactly.

  • @BLUELINEOFCORRUPTION
    @BLUELINEOFCORRUPTION 2 месяца назад +2

    Attorney versus an Attorney General. A true conflict of Intrust. For the simple reason an attorney will not touch this case. It's a death sentence to his career. Corruption breed's Corruption.

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  2 месяца назад +1

      EXACTLY!!!

    • @grayrecluse7496
      @grayrecluse7496 28 дней назад +1

      ​@@ThePro-SeYou have to get an out of state attorney.

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  28 дней назад +1

      I figured I'd just keep trapping the bad actors in the state, and show them the monster they created.

  • @BewarePeople-od2bd
    @BewarePeople-od2bd Месяц назад +1

    Time to sue the attorney general

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  Месяц назад

      I'm working on that.

  • @Sgt-Gravy
    @Sgt-Gravy 2 месяца назад +2

    How can we make an informed decision when we are getting conflicting information from those who are supposed to be the leading authority of the information? If the written law says 1 thing & the authorities say another what are we supposed to do?? Trust another authority on the matter & hope they too don't give us an altogether different story than the previous authorities? 🤦🤷‍♂️ give an inch of letting little things slide, and they'll take a mile by training bad behavior as legal & businessas as usual & make it policy or law despite it contradicting the previous letter of the law.

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  2 месяца назад +2

      They full and well knew I wasn't looking for legal advice. That's just the excuse they always give so that they don't have to address the facts.
      You nailed it. It's impossible when the government will lie and use the police to quiet the truth.

  • @Sgt-Gravy
    @Sgt-Gravy 2 месяца назад +1

    "We" are not looking for legal advice "we" are looking for information on the legal PROCESS that they are supposed to be the authority of & be knowledgeable about above the common citizen... SMH My local county court house told me I needed to hire a lawyer when I was trying to go Pro Se against the construction company that didn't do a proper job & then walked away from the job with out refunding me for not doing the entire job. I wasn't taught in school how the legal system works & with my learning disabilities I needed clarification on what I was researching but they said that counts as "legal advice" to tell me the process & what forms I would need. Best Of Luck Brother! I hope you get what you need to accomplish your goal!!

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  2 месяца назад +3

      Yeah, they deliberately make everything a legal question so that no one can actually figure anything out. It's a racket , because attorneys will just gladly take your money and do no work.

    • @Sgt-Gravy
      @Sgt-Gravy 2 месяца назад +2

      @@ThePro-Se absolutely 💯 %

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  2 месяца назад +1

      I'm going to be the wall that stops them.

  • @jett888
    @jett888 Месяц назад +1

    I didn't hear you once ask for "legal advice" from that officer.
    I love how they say "I didn't see it happen"
    Looks like you have a big lawsuit on your hands if they aren't
    willing to help a woman who is disabled.
    That officer wouldn't even tell you what he would do if you were to go up
    to (not IN) the office?

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  Месяц назад

      I have a few. I fact, I should upload them, but people hate the AI and I don't have time to read it.

  • @jett888
    @jett888 Месяц назад +1

    Wouldn't the fact that a People doesn't want to give her address out loud
    stand with the 5th Amendment - she didn't want to incriminate herself. Doxing yourself
    in a public meeting would be incriminating yourself and also putting yourself in danger.
    Don't we have a right to defend ourselves?

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  Месяц назад

      They also verbally waived the requirement for her

  • @WeaselJCD
    @WeaselJCD 2 месяца назад +1

    exhibit A,B and C why ACAB!
    ACAB & WCPOS!

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  2 месяца назад +1

      It's definitely disturbing

  • @jett888
    @jett888 Месяц назад +1

    To Very Politely dismiss your legitimate concerns is STILL dismissing our
    concerns.
    That man should have gone in the office and demanded they take
    your complaint.
    Your mom thought for sure the Government is here to help.
    She will learn soon enough we have ALL been lied to for a long
    long time. I still think you should have your mom continue what she
    was saying to the school board- because they obviously don't want to
    have it aired in public.

    • @ThePro-Se
      @ThePro-Se  Месяц назад

      I have that under control. We have an emergency hearing on Tuesday that I requested so we can force compliance.