Why Russia’s New Sukhoi Su-75 Checkmate has a really big wing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- In today’s episode, we are going to talk about Why Russia’s New ‘Checkmate’ has a really big wing? Keep watching the video to get the answer.
In July 20,2021, Russia’s Unified Aircraft-Building Corporation and the Sukhoi Aircraft Company used the opening day of the Moscow Aviation and Space Expo (MAKS) to take the wraps off a new single-engine stealth fighter. The roll-out of this airplane, now called the Su-75 Checkmate Light Tactical Aircraft, was made the centerpiece of the traditional Day One visit to the show by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It’s a new design that Moscow hopes will create a niche for its combat aircraft industry in the export market. Their intent is to upend sales by competitor aircraft built by other nations the Swedish JAS-39E/F Gripen, the Lockheed Martin F-35. and even the Shenyang J-35, a Chinese plane in development even longer than the Su-75 by offering a cheaper, Russian-made alternative.
All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ militarytv.channel
defense-tv.com/ 
Наука
A large wing on a fighter primarily has 2 reasons:
- High maneuverability (low wing loading)
- large Fuel storage
More wing erea making it able to go higher
And more space for weapons?
Also meaning easy target
@@hopefullylost4012 all USA aircraft similar big wings…… but their jets are less sleek tho
Correct, the brits had the delta wing fighter in the late 50's called gloster Javelin. Like the Vulcan delta wing bomber they were inherrently steaalthy with low radar cross section.
I mean. For non nato members who cant purchase the F-35. Its either this or build their own. And russia seems to be with the most experience in aviation outside of Nato
@fuckyoutubepolicy staff
You spelled the Flop-35 wrong tho.
Deposit your salty tears below...
@fuckyoutubepolicy staff Their has been no Su 57 crashes unlike the F35 which has been in several crashes.
@@underdogtv2855 Maybe because there are ONLY 12 built most of them delivered in last years or so. For comparison there are 750 F35 operational. They literally make more f35 in a month than the whole su57 fighters in use.
@@FilipDvorskySK nah stop with those excuses F-35 is just not worth it.
Excuses? How about why it is selling great ?
It’s actually very large, have you seen it next to the Su-57?
I'd love to know your opinion. I'm also a big follower of this channel and I also make content concerning life in Russia. Sadly the youtube algorithm has not been as wonderful to me yet. Virtually every person who find my channel claims that it is great, but few get to watch it. Can you be completely straightforward and inform me just how I can make better videos? I value your sincere opinion.
i have seen that one, its wing even bigger than Su-57 though
So is their okhotnik drone , it's as big as the SU 75
@@SamsRussianAdventures I subscribed ❤️
@@SamsRussianAdventures bruh your lucky you have hundreds to thousands of views I would love to have even half of your views.
I don't care what's better Russian air craft is beautiful specially su-57
I'd be fascinated to know your opinion. I'm also a massive follower of this channel and I likewise create vlogs regarding life in Russia. Unfortunately the youtube algorithm has actually not been as good to me yet. Almost all people that views my vlogs writes that it is incredible, but not many get to enjoy it. Can you be extremely straightforward and inform me just how I can improve the content? I value your sincere point of view.
"Success" of the F35 on the market, can only be seen by two key factors: First is that it's primarily a pre-order financed, Australia, Turkey, Japan, etc... Second would be the still strength of US diplomacy to bribe, or even scare countries into weapon deals, yes, as a country you risk gigantic problems if you trade with Chinese or Russian weapon manufacturers. So let's not talk about nonexisting "free market" for weapons or that as a measure for any weapon system. Weapons sale is pure politics.
Just imagine Germany saying "you didn't let us to buy 35's, so screw you, we'll buy that russian thing"
gibberish
@@alexandermarinin7036 that's what i thought - the twin engine SU would be a great replacement for the tornado. ( problem, no one cares what we think)
@@CHMichael plus it could open possibility to Germany to make money by selling modern NATO standards compatible avionics to those countries who want to upgrade their existing previous generations SU's
@@CHMichael Theres a reason no one cares what you think when it comes to military purchases.
Did you know that only the west have been calling the su75 a stealth fighter, the Russians never called it a stealth plane only a 5th generation fighter.
It would be great to know your opinion. I'm additionally a substantial fan of this channel and I additionally make videos with regards to life in Russia. I don't know why but the youtube algorithm has not been as kind to me yet. Practically everyone that watches my content states that it is incredible, unfortunately few are able to enjoy it. Can you be completely sincere and inform me how I can make better videos? I value your straightforward opinion.
Su 75 isnt stealth or 5 gen its just as low rcs as j 31 or f 16 Without most weapons or drop tanks but that is not stealth or 5 gen.
5th gen fighers are stealth
5th generation is just a silly marketing slogan. Invented by Lockheed Martin to make it's plane sound cooler.
And stealth is also a scam....stealth doesn't exist.
You can lower a planes RCS but you can't eliminate it.
And long wavelenght radars can see 'stealth'.
@@KondorDCS nearly a decade ago Iran downed a Sentinel drone which is far far more steathy than any of those "5th gen"
And they detect the drone with legacy system from the 70s , steath is overhype and underperform
big wing=low wing loading=nice manuverbility
also low loiter speed so its useful for ground attack.
So you must know the weight and wetted aspect ratio of the finished design. Thats impressive if true. If not - your statement is pure conjecture
Big wing also means more drag.
The Vietnamese have a tradition of using Soviet/Russian aircraft. However they are also very interested in American F-16. So it’s a tough competition for Russia.
Wait Vietnam is a friend of usa ?
@@helloworld.w6075 The American-Vietnam relationship has warmed up drastically since the conflict ends in 75.
The Vietnamese gov want to get closer to the West, and the American is shipping their focus on China. So the relationship between the two got even better in recent years.
@@thienbui898 dont want to relation to end like the backstabbing nature of china
@@helloworld.w6075 the CCP is in control of the VCP (Vietnamese communist party), so VN (under the authoritarian control of the communist party) will never be friends with the west. Even the Miss world contestant from VN performed a song about killing Americans right on American soil (Porte Rico) a few days ago. The commies have no shames, they will stab you in the back after they just call you friend. Never trust commies!!!
@@helloworld.w6075 F 16 это самолет 4 поколения.
The F-22 is 80s tech too.
The Su-35 is actually more recent.
It doesn't have much in common with a Su-27.
The difference is bigger than between a Hornet and a Super Hornet.
The Su-35 is highly sought, but its a complex jet, they cant be manufactured as fast as a Su-27SM.
The Su-35 is a 4.5 gen jet that can go against 5gen jets.
Its the best non 5th gen jet currently in service.
So it's the best 5 th gen but it really a 4.5 gen ? It's never been in combat, stop masterbating.
the eurofighter and rafale would like to have a word with you
@@lobster838 rafale is way better than eurofighter in combat
but su35 is more advanced than rafale
@@gazzy01 we don't know because there's a 100% posibility that the information they give for free are just fabricated with just a little bit of facts because everything is confidential, if you really want to know then starts ww3 with or without nukes then you'll have your answer
@@aaronpingol1566 how's is jf20 compared to all?
I would much prefer this over the SU-57 in BF 2042
Same
I really wanted bf2042 to be a full out ww3. Modern/slightly futuristic factions going against each other, not just the US and Russia. I was hoping to see the su 57, j31, the Japanese new fighter jet, the Korean new fighter jet, maybe some rafaels, eurofighters, etc.
@@MrUser999999 I was hoping we atleast got China and possibly Germany, France and UK (perhaps just combine the last 3 into a one faction
@@grantt1589 yeah, 2 (us and eu)NATO's and 2 (whatever China and Russia call their allies). Keeping the no pat story, maybe they could have had one no pat faction with nato vehicles (ex: Japanese jet, US helis, British tanks, German ifv, etc) and the other no pat faction with russian/Chinese allied vehicles.
I am not a good BF player since WW1, but I did not see the use of fighters during the trial. Basically I just flew around because the enemy didn't fly and just waited like hmhmm screw this I need to get into the fight.
I would buy the game but I am sick of hero systems. Just let me customize my character and pick a class.
This is basically what the US could have had with the X32. The final version would have looked very similar to this. with the exception of having a single piece high mounted delta.
it's hilarious how often the US does something, comes up with a new design, or comes up with some new tech and after a few years suddenly China and Russia have something eerily similar
trust me, this project won't even reach the stage X32 got to as it will never be a plane to fly
Its physical appearance looks like they fused a YF23 with X32
@@arthas640 Eh You could say vice-versa here, at least when it comes to U.S-Russia weapon developments, both work off of pre-existing concepts no matter where they originate.
@@arthas640 Should I remind you that everything US currently has was taken of German technologies after WW2?
If they could truly hit that $25 - $30M price in production, and it had any kind of advanced avionics, they’d probably sell like iPhones.
the Su-57's cost is in that ballparc (when they signed the 76 contract in summer 2019 the average cost of an airplane was the equivalent of 34.2mil$ by today's exchange rate it's 30 mil$ already ). With 1 less engine and less sensors than the Su-57 and a lot less body work (smaller size, less fuel pumps, 1 less weapons bay etc) ... their production cost could easily be in the 20-25mil$.
Ofcourse when the contracts will be signed for the Su-75 they will not be 30 times the number of airplanes, as the contracts inculde spare parts, simulators, weapons, training pilots and technicians for maintenance ... so if for example vietnam gets 24 Su-75 the contract value willbe closer to 1.7 billion $ rather than 672mil$ (28mil$ per fighter) which means the Russians can squeeze the margin of benefit in the fighter itself to increase money influx from other aspects over the time (Maintenance/potential upgrades/weapons).
@@tunisiandom9318 This is the price inside Russia. The export price is 2 or even 3 times more expensive.
@@ВиталийПавлов-х1е 🤦🏻♂️ where do you get such info, mr. Expert?
@@ВиталийПавлов-х1е I explained why the export price is much higher: because it also comprises training, simulators, spare parts and weapons.
if you compare the unit price (fly away cost of the fighter) the diff would be in the 30% range which corresponds for VTA (20%) and 10-15% profit margin for the constructor.
So if the unit cost is 24 mil$ (high end estimate) the selling price with 10% profit margin will be 32 mil$. ( constructor making 2.88 mil$ profit and government getting 4.8 mil$ in taxes)
This is definitely a mig29 replacement for countries who were looking for cheap versatile fighters.
It's beautiful!
It's awesome,very beautiful
@@frederickgates4349 the intake tough!! Meh
No it’s not.
You shoud try to sit in ANY of post USSR tank or aircraft. They are terrible! Not for person to survive.
@@levaal1981 not really, actually soviet had better manufacture at 1970s compare to western blocks, but after 1970s they stuck and western a head better than them, until now probably russia can't match with US manufacture at all way including tanks, aircharft etc....
Unlike our missileer whiz-kids touting the F-35, Ivan has always recognized that BVR combat is a crap-shoot, won, lose, or draw. If it comes to a draw, and both sides survive the initial missile exchange, there will be a merge, and a dogfight. In a contest to get the other guy out in front of you, the ability to fly slow while maintaining control is not to be sold short.
I disagree since both sides avoid the MAR while trying to push each other defensive.
If in the meen time if they should exhaust their expendables ie. missiles under most circumstances (not always) they would break off and RTB.
hey boomer this isn't the '60's anymore, even by the '80's all "dogfights" had moved to BVR combat. Missiles are just way too advanced and maneuverable for WW2 style dogfights to happen anymore
One thing i am sure russia is good at , making gorgeous flying machines
Nothing beats F-22 and F-16 in aesthetics [F-16 being a 40+ year old plane admittedly].
Russia colours of choise are better
Russia is still broke since the fall of the Soviet Union.
@wanna start a ww3? then use my reply section I call bullshit on that one. All you guys are known for is stealing and mass corruption on a grand scale. Stealing from your people is common place and everyone is suppressed. Fix your government first. It’s bloody corrupt especially with a KGB agent running it.
@wanna start a ww3? then use my reply section I never said I hated Russians first off. Secondly Putin was KGB agent. Now it’s FSB. Same thing with another name. And when you have to export your military planes for cash then you know your government is broke. It’s always been like that always will. Look bud I know you are little slow over there but nobody is buying Russian anything including their cars. For being such smart people you think that you would be a 1st world county.
You have an expressive voice and an excellent diction. I enjoyed your narration greatly. Also, the music was expertly inserted, just the right volume.
P.S. Happy New Year, guv! Be healthy! 😑
As the user @grndzro mentioned it's funny how similar this aircraft is to the Boeing X-32, like they took that plane and simplified it's design to make it as cheap as possible
4:22 the lower compartment with the su-75 is similar to the compartment with the u-57 and accommodates 3 medium-range missiles, the side compartments of the su-75 accommodate one medium or short-range missile. su57 carries 8 missiles in compartments, SU-75 5 missiles
су 57 все таки много целевой поэтому он может больше нести чем су 75
How are they making all these fancy high end electronic systems when they can't even make the simplest microprocessor?? According to other commentators on the subject of electronics, the Russians failed to make even the most rudimentary micro computer, China is far ahead of them
Now I have to admit that, if the diverter is bad for stealth, the Mig-21 like intake is a good idea. Probably the bump on front of the F-35 intakes is also bad for stealth.
F35 is cheaper version of F22 for sale.
Russian : That is a good business strategy.
“Big wing?” Says you. Why not state the operational wing loading, and compare it to other fighter aircraft?
MOGU NAPRAVITI ŠTA POŽELE , ALI OBIČNO KOLIKO IM JE POTREBNA EFIKASNOST U BORBI . IMAJU RUSI JOŠ BAR TRI-ČETIRI SPREMNE GENERACIJE ISPRED PETE, ALI ZA SADA NE ŽURE. DIZAJN ZA SVAKU POHVALU. BRAVO .!! 👍👍👍
Baš tako čuj američke propagande? A Rusi samo rade i ćute pa kad ih iznesu i poredjaju i jedan deo uzleti onda ćemo videti. A svaki avion od Mig.29 Mig.35 Mig.32 SU.24 SU.25 SU.27 SU.30 SU.33 SU.34 SU.35 SU.37 koji se joj neki od modela prave mogu da zgaze njihove sve avione i stelt F.22 F.35 a zato i sami padaju nemoraš ih ni gadjati nekidan sam od sebe se radkreči niko ga ne dira onda kad poleću sleću do sad im je pao dobar br. Mnoge zemlje su prizemljili F.35 ako nisu i sve. A što nepokažu istinu koliko je palo. Pa naši Mig.29 J.22 g4 su mašine za njihove 5gen nisu ni 5gen završili a već prave 6gen. A zamisli kad budu SU.75 SU.57 Mig.41 počeli da izlaze iz hangara pa uzkete sa ponosom al tu nema greške i rušenja.
Mig-35 and Su-35 are not less advanced than foreign 5th generation planes. Mig-35 is not upgraded Mig-29 but completely different plane, even fuselages are different. Same with Su-35. Both planes have all 5th generation planes features except stealth shapes. Mig-35 is the the first Russian jet fighter with AESA radar. Both plane can properly do necessary job in modern air combat and ground targets attack. F-22 is 80s design and F-35 is replica of Yak -141 design of 90s. Mig-35 and Su-35 are more modern
Yes, these people seem to be getting data of russian planes from Popular Mechanics, BBC and The National Interest. lol
The su and mig 35s are both minor updates on 70s designs. They are old planes
Hahahaha yeah ok
So the MiG35 and Su35 just happen to look like the older MiG and Su on accident then? Come on! Yeah, the avionics, controls, etc. have been upgraded; but saying they’re “new” planes is absurd. And American jets are getting updated as well: the F15 is being modernized, the F22 is going to be improved, the F/A18 Superhornet already has AESA radar, and even F16s are being upgraded. Trying to say the US’s jets are out of date is ridiculous; especially the F22.
@@dondelchulia3189 You lie. Both are jets of 4++ generations. They have completely new avionics and weaponry, both have ESA radars, artificial intelligence , new fuselage, new engines. Unlike americans their engines are with 3d vectoring. USA does not have anything similar. Americans still rely only on obsolete and old F-16 and F-15 mostly. They just slightly update them. Mi-35 and Su-35 are completely rebuilt the most successful jets of late 20 century.
I am not Russian but I support Russia the most , in every conflict they faced .
🇷🇺❤️🇧🇳
Sounds like a cheep version of the Boeing X-32. So is Russia planning on moving to the Checkmate without finishing the S-57? The S-57 plain has not been sold to anyone, entered massproduction, made combat read, or uses in anyway as a leading edge attack before air superiority has been well established.
Can individual buy an su-57 ? if i get rich am sure i would love to have one to fly around
Some American individuals / companies have bought Russian aircraft even mig 29. So it maybe possible to buy a de-weaponised su57 in the future but definitely not now or in the next 10 years
@@kaz9242 imagine your self flying with this beauty and fly high near the space
@@aborkmga1 dammmmm you have me a brand new thing I wanna do in life. Time so research the richest single women in the world and see if they need a partner 😂😂
I don't know American laws u would have to ask a lawyer first
@@TiagoOrange yeah just imagining the idea alon is wounderfull , and there isn't alot of single millionaire woman out there sorry i have to tell you this 😂
The su75 consists of parts of the SU 57, the su75 has a Su 57 wing installed, it is the world's first light fighter that is assembled from parts of a heavy fighter
it's not, this isn't a real plane and will never be
@@rocketman1058 a ha ha
@@rocketman1058 keep barking!🤣
It don’t have same wing as Su-57. They Look similar but they are not the same
Considering the Su 57 is marketed as a cheaper F 35 and most of F 35 issues stem from it's small wing and vtol, I think there's you're answer right there.
I thought the 57 was marketed against the F22.
The SU 57 is needed for internal use, most of the characteristics are ahead of the F 22.
The F 22 is ahead in stealth, but there is a minus of "full" stealth. The technology is not fully completed because in order to achieve "complete" invisibility, it is necessary to worsen the aerodynamics of the aircraft. In my opinion, Russia has chosen the path of the Su 57, make it excellent in aerodynamics, but also add a little stealth. Apparently, Russia is still stagnating in its production, I'm waiting for it to start producing in normal quantities. In the meantime, a batch has been made.
Not true. This plane was not ordered by the Russian armed forces. It was created on an initiative basis exclusively for commercial sale to third world countries. Therefore, we set the base cost cheaper than everyone else. Since twin-engine options are expensive for such countries. And no placement on the aircraft carrier was planned. During the presentation, the manufacturer only expressed the hope that the Russian armed forces would also show interest in this aircraft. Where did you get such conclusions?
“It’s a new design”
Mrf-54e:your kidding right
Pardon sir?
Mig 41 would be a game changer.
Larger wing means more payload and shorter takeoff,its not complicated
Has the SU-75 flown, yet? Will it become available in quantity in less time than SU-57 has thus far required?
Depends on contracts. SU-57 is strictly for domestic use, so its production is slow, because war budget of Russia is limited, but SU-75 is announced as an export-oriented fighter, so if there will be many buyers (you know, MiG-21s are good, but it is time to replace them, so I think there WILL be many buyers, especially considering the price), there will be great production numbers
@@Янус_Ырт Not really, A twin seater Su57 was being dubbed under FRFA programme with India but India pulled out of the contract in 2017. The Russian side has thus stated the contact is still open if they want to resume the development. The Su75 and Su57 are both expected to be piched for the 114 MRFA programme of IAF
It appears to be smaller than the F-35
But Sukhoi says its bigger than we expected so im thinking about larger than F22 but Smaller than Su 57 and the upcoming Mig 41 will be larger than Su 57.
It will finally a bit bigger than a C130 and smaller than a C5 Galaxy...
@@elbeiser 🤣 but really more like an 25Meter long
Pounds?! Please use the METRIC system!!
ลุงอยากขายของในตลาดเปิดใหม่ลุงก็ต้อง 50-50 สิการค้าสร้างมิตรภาพสงครามสร้างรอยแค้น พิจารณาดูนะลุงโจ
Will it be that good if it doesn't have the best electronics on board?
the SUKHOI Su-75A Checkmate multi role air dominance fighter could do with a navalized carrier borne variant exclusively for the navy . . . re-designate the naval variant of the Su-75A as SUKHOI Su-69B Checkmate-M multi role fighter interceptor . . .
Stands no chance against the Gripen in sales.
I see this might have great potential.
*might* - if built ... ever
Who would buy it? Know one!
Is there a STOVL version?
Algeria has ordered 14 su57 and Egypt and Indonesia are interested in buying su57
Low landing speed, higher fuel capacity, bigger radar base... I guess
Is the wing large because they can't make it small? A naval fighter for a carrier that is on its last legs?
In the unlikely event this will become a thing, it will be the 1st russian single engine fighter jet since the mig23. odds are low, especially now.
Shenyang j35 looks very beautiful
I would take one of them before a f-35 any day.
Dragonflies have big wings, so they can outmaneuver their prey.
It's gonna end up another su-57, failed by their competition and scrapped
Modern planes take decades to make operational. This is not the days of making 100 planes a day.
If Russia is not winning this battle in "who has the best weapons", we could expect more terror from US in entire world.
Alas, this is so, we have to defend ourselves from NATO aggression. After all, we are not expanding our sphere of influence to the East, but America and its allies.
Russia was never winning the battle in weapons, just look at Ukraine.
@@lw7238 15% of there military against the second biggest country in Europe there doing pretty good actually
@@little_error295 What are you talking about? It's not the size of land that counts. It's the amount of military men you have and well you use them plus quality equipment. You make no sense.
@@lw7238 lol the more land you have to take the harder an invasion is idiot 😂 because the more land it is the higher risk your forces are spread thin also harder for logistics on top of that it is much easier to be encircled and you also have to shell more things which costs more money and more equipment you can’t be this dumb
Mig-21 Vs F-5: electric boogaloo
hahahaha russia and advanced sensors are 2 words that should never be used in one sentence 😂🤣
Jets don't require computer design. The stealth jet have very very simple design.
because their design centers have big pc screens/monitors with big pc/mini-computers on big microprocessors
The primary driving force behind the use of variable air volume VAV system is reduced owning and operating cost through reduce fan and reduce heat energy consumption at the partial load. Typically a building will experience its design low less than 5% of its design life with the use of shut off VAV system the airflow is reduced as the cooling load drops so that only the exact amount of are required to offset the cooling load will be delivered by the central system fan with its VAV discharge volume controls... I e. Inlet guide vanes or fan speed control at the heart of all VAV terminals where they are fan power shut off single or double d u c t type is the air modulating device which is commonly called and air valve VHB terminals are offered in numerous sizes and control types but all of them contain one or more are valves plus are diffusion devices the most common and desirable if the fusion device for air distribution in the condition spaces though linear slide diffuser which insurance good air movement and even distribution without uncomfortable draft's due to air jumping even at modulated conditions unlike standard diffusers that often cause drafts are dumping discharge are directly downward into the conditioned space they're very trained linear slot diffuser delivers condition are using distribution in a method and its effect this effect is created by discharging the condition are along the ceiling surface at relatively High velocities as shown in figure 10 - CM this creates an air of comparatively low air pressure that causes the discharge Airstream so hug the ceiling and intern induce Rome air upward at the same time with a confectionate effect by the time that these discharged are hugging the ceiling settles into the occupied levels of the of the room remember the volumetric air space in the temperature difference of the outside wall and the weight of the btb and the dew point temperature Theory inside of a volumetric airspace it is a song than average temperature between the rooms temperature in the supply are DBT temperature this effect occurs even when air flow is reduced to less than 4% of design floor probably plays linear Slide the fuses also improve air quality with this affect air distribution by improving air movements in the space and eliminating areas of stagnant stratified air figures 10 CNN 10 - Co both represent a form of variable air volume reheat systems that typically modulates the primary are volume down in response to reductions in space cooling loads until the air volume reaches a predetermined minimum value at this point the reheat is activated to provide a constant minimum environment variable Supply Air temperatures to satisfy the reduce space loads
Damn…. Engineer much?? Informative
To add context to why India pulled out. The program was established in the context of India paying off its debt to the USSR (Russia is inherent of USSR). Instead of paying the debt, India sponsors the program for the same amount. Indian personnel got some "know-how" in modern jet building and India paid off its debt. Once the debt was paid India pulled out of the program.
India was in Su57 program not Su75 program , and India left Su57 program because Russia traded stealth for maneuverability
@@notimportantperson6382 wasn’t it also due to build quality. The Indians could of continued on with there version while the Russians go there way.
@@mitchjames9350 Indians could do it but Russian Technology is far more advanced than indian.
There was no debt. Don’t spread rumors. 😂
No way it sells for $30M.
nice look, but tillit up n running we will have to wait
Why is the wing so big? There was a lot of excess plywood and glue
This would look amazing with canards in front of the wings
I hate that these channels don't do any research, just browse a blog post and make a video with a few slides. Here's one for example; the jet is actually quite large. It's at least the size of the Chinese j20, almost as big as the su57 and the su57 is big by any standard of a fighter jet
Actually it is much smaller than Su57 or J20. The size you can see is its wings. Yes, SU75 does have big wings due to it require enough lifting power, but if you look at its maximum taking off weight, it will find it is as big as F16, maybe bigger than it a little bit
@@donchen4906 don't worry about how they look. The jets have measurements. The j20 is smaller than the su57. The su75 is only slightly smaller.
@@deven6518 Ok, if you believe so: a single engine fighter with no obvious increase in engine thrust can achieve the almost same weight as double engine fighters. Really wise, keep going dude.
Either way.....damn it looks good
Jaki fajny amerykański znowu im wyszedł. Cóż za niespodziewanka.
Informative and captivating presentation.
Thank you.
Watching other video ruclips.net/video/3o2B3M2TXLk/видео.html
India has it's own 5.5 gen project and it's only the final stage
Can’t wait to see this come into production in 2070s. But hey the CGI is getting way better
It’s too bad that Canada answers to our southern neighbour, we need a new fleet of fighters 😞
The F-35 is ten times the fighter this piece of shit will be
Looks a lot like the Boeing X32. Odd to turn it into a cheap, lightweight export model
India regretting it's decision now because their own stealth jet is no where to be seen anytime soon.
Its not stealthy, those flat wings will reflect back and be detected
Maybe capability is more important than max speed nowdays
A fighter design from the 1980's isn't even that old. Think F18, F16, and F15 all of which are from the 70's and 80's and have been modernized several times.
The Mig 35 and Su 35 are much more significant upgrades over their predecessors compared to american counter parts. Not only did they get technological and digital retrofits, the airframes are entirely new (not an old frame with new stuff) and have been modernized using modern materials, manufacturing tech, and ip, making them truelly new planes even if they look alike.
The Su-57 is by far the most advanced fighter that is actually in service, as its capabalities aren't limited by weapon capacity (F22), flight capabilities (F35), weight (J20), etc. It is a true multi role stealth jet. It is both a fighter and bomber, as well as a standalone EW suite and weapons guidance and AWAC system for drones and other fighters.
Su-75 is an export focused plane, russia won't be buying it to replace existing fully functional su35/mig35 fighters as it would actually be a downgrade. Seeing as to how the mig35 and su35 are not for sale, this su75 seems to be a beta test for other countries to buy and use and for russia go gain valuable data on a cheap stealth fighters operational capabilities.
Considering it has a max weapon weight of 16klb and an r73 weights some 250lb, this is a very capable competitor to an F35, especially if it does in fact use an i30 engine, which is nearly double the capability of the F35. The engine is still in development however, so this could be a cash grab plane to fund its completion and manufacturing/retrofit of existing Su57's.
Now as for low RCS...its possible its on the level of the rafale or eurofighter, which is already pretty great for a 25-30m$ plane.
As for the wings, this seems to be a nose authority plane since it will have thrust vectoring.
Su-75 is a plywood model. It may have big wings, small ones, and whatever else made of plywood.
The material and electronics probably not good enough to deal with attacks like Javellin/Stinger. Take years to get in production
The new russian aircraft of 6 th generation is amazing aircraft ever build in the world.specially with price and new radar matryoshka capable to reech in the long distance other aircraft .I THINK THE RUSSIAN IS ONE STEP FORWARD THE USA!!
HA HA HA HA Russia has no 5th generation only 4.5 generation and only a small number. 6th gen is a pipedream for Russia.
@@lw7238 mig 41 idiot 😂
The only thing that scares the new Russian "superbombers" is the YT community. Nobody else is surprised.
Why do eagles have big wings and chickens small ones?
Cause chickens are yellow and have a smaller beak. Beak size matter if you want to fly fast.
Uhhh what about the F-35C? You know? That one where a single wing is 2x the width of its fuselage?
Fact! It can turn harder and fly slower. The rumor has it that there are Un-Manned drone models of an F-35 out there. Fact, F-22's replace is already flying, the head of the USAF said so.
Except text flights already took place in the UAE at the airshow
lol no, they didnt
Exposed engine exhausts + inadequate radar absorption material + huge wings = a nice fat target for F-22's
The issue of exposed engine exhausts is actually much smaller than most would be led to believe. In fact high aspect (head on) stealth features are the most sought after (look at more recent j20 and su57 designs) What is important in most cases is that they cant see you approaching for the attack. Similar reason why the F22 was made to be most stealthy from a head on aspect. Not that it doesn't matter, but if someone is looking up your exhaust, it doesn't really make much difference if you've already shot and turned around. Plus who knows, maybe it will have 3d thrust vectoring? F22 stealthy engine exhaust design makes this impossible.
Not sure how you determined how much radar absorption material they plan to use... but it will certainly be less than the f22 or even f35, and for good reason since it degrades very easily and needs constant maintenance to remain effective. Keep in mind high maintenance costs are a big part of the reason we aren't getting any more F22s. Less stealth is a price many countries would be willing to pay in order to have more stealth aircraft. Considering this: you would just break even for cost effectiveness if you shot down 1 F22 for every 10 SU75s lost. Not so bad if that is the actual price ( I suspect that is a little optimistic though )
Wing size doesn't really impact how easy of a target it is, and if it did... F16 is about 6 feet smaller, F35 4 feet smaller, F15 is about 4 feet larger, while f22 is 5 feet larger. Larger wingspan is mostly beneficial.
Wing size does impact how much internal fuel you can carry, and as a result the combat range which is extremely important. In any contested airspace you aren't going to be able to perform any aerial refueling. Maybe mq25 will change this though. mq25 is pretty exciting stuff.
Not that I expect the SU75 to really stand up to the F22, sure some corners will be cut, and capabilities promised and not quite delivered for another 5 years ( looking at those SU57 engines ) but if it enters serial production it has the potential to out compete the 4th gen F series and maybe even the F35.
@@dgood9591 Russians do like their thrust vectoring. I have seen skilled USA pilots use the push fan system achieve impressive thrust vector maneuver. Given on the F35 the cover shield for the lift fan flaps open I suspect using this at combat speeds is laughably outrageous. A little less stealth for the ability to dogfight better is a trade off I expect from a Russian.
@@christopherboyle2403 Dog fights are only for dreamers, building an airframe for that is not practical anymore. It's obvious that the US is getting away from that outdated concept. It's shoot and scoot with long range rockets.
@@lw7238 The USA employed this doctrine once before regarding machine guns. Why do aircraft need machine guns when you can fire and forget (sometime in the 70s). A few dogfights with MIGs which had machine guns fitted had the USA decide maybe the airframe should have some machine guns fitted.
The pilot is a bigger problem. I expect we will see more fly by wire equipment allowing for more manoeuvrable and faster airframes. Relying on fire and forget missiles alone is a mistake or you would just build longer distance missiles.
@@christopherboyle2403 It's also for ground firing. But you don't build an airframe around dog fights. That would be stupid. The machine gun is a last resort if all else fails and you can't escape. I never said they would get rid of them but they are pretty much useless now for dog fights.
India should buy this , should be 1st customer 😉
Isn't it strange that every other country's "Stealth" fighters just appear to be a mashup of US Stealth aircraft and prototypes? As if they pick and choose want they want from the F-22, YF-23, YF-32 and F-35. I wonder why that is??? I'm sure they could come up with their own stealth aircraft without having to resort to spying and espionage! After all, it seems that all I read in comments sections is how great certain militaries are; and I'm sure you know which country I'm talking a out without having to mention it.
the thing is you cant make a design and expect it to be stealthy , there are limits and also about stealing and spying on US , every country does that and was done .
production in 7 years?? wake me up then
The plane will not fly as it is mocked up. I would be shocked if they didn't know that, but mocked it up anyways to have something that looks good.
Os aviões russos são os mais bonitos e muito tecnologicamente avançados.👏👏👏👏
yeah, right…. :))))
First part of your comment is subjective so I won't comment on it but the second part is objectively wrong. Russian aerospace is lagging far behind the West's now
Soooo this is the 2nd iteration of checkmate. They lost the first game...
Intake inlet is so small gonna be hard for maintainers to get in for post flight inspections.
I think its a delta wing design
no
Not an actual flying aircraft. Narrator
Keeps saying " is" as opposed to
" Will be". Gives the impression that
This is an actual mission ready
Aircraft.
wing nya dpt utk gantung lbh bnyk senjata makanya lebar
Like all Russian designed aircraft , it's a real kick ass , beauty !
“No wing - no turn.” Pierre Sprey millitary analyst.
also F35 is a "flying turkey"
Blimey that looks familiar 🙂
Yeah, nonexistent fighter has pretty big wings. Tomorrow the chief engineer will sober up and draw smaller wings.
Has a single one of these paper planes been built yet? Have they demonstrated this plane at any airshows?
No
Why she's got big wing? Simple. She joined Big Wang community
Su75, Big wing, more lift, better manouverability.
Fail-35, small, stubby wings, great for VTOL, but also less lift, poor manouverability....cant turn, cant climb, cant run.
Who’s running?
@@ROUGHNECKROGERS 🤣🤣
@@ROUGHNECKROGERS The F35s when they had to engage russian made Sukhois in a war game excersize over Taiwan, orchestrated by RAND corp. F35s and F22s got ANNIHILATED and the F-18s got overwhelmed.
@@KondorDCS the parameters of those war games are well known as a joke. The 35s had to be forced into dog fights w/o the use of ecm. Looks like someone wanted a bigger budget. 78/1
@@ROUGHNECKROGERS Hah your ego when you realize what sort of environment the 35' will be used in when that day comes, it's not going to go like the war games think.
Very good looking aircraft.
omly a trainer costs 25-30 million dollars ... no serious fighter can be built for that money.