On level three, it seems like it got the wording messed up. If you just run the redstone dust into the OTHER block with a torch, it creates a single value RS Nor latch, an ancient way of making toggles. Their would actually have to be a button on each block, and it would mean that you can toggle the machine only by pressing the button on the side already giving an output, but that can easily be made into a t flip flop.
Well, the AI is programmed to train itself to sound smart, essentially. It isn't actually smart; it doesn't actually have brain power. Thus, Chat GPT and similiar AI models will eventually reach a limit to how good it gets before the small error rate it has limits its capabilities.
I think if you played around with the wordings you could make these somewhat work Example 1: on step 3 using the redstone to connect the button to the other block instead of the one it's on. Example 2: on step 4, placing the hopper trench adjacent to the water trench and using the repeaters for a repeater clock(thus experimenting with timings).
Год назад+4
I'd be interested to see what happens if you first establish a language for communicating redstone designs, and then asked it to design something. I have a feeling it would perform a lot better.
The way AIs like chat GPT work is that they don't actually understand what they are saying. They know how the human language is constructed, and know how to string words together in a way that imitates human writing. But they don't know what the actual words mean. The AI doesn't know that redstone dust has signal strength, it just knows that from its training data the words "redstone dust" and "signal strength" are often related. Essentially what this means is that they have no concept of truth or falsehood. So it will confidently lie to you, misrepresenting reality in odd but grammatically correct ways. So what you get is a complex mess of competently written details that sometimes get jumbled around based on what the AI thinks sounds most "human" or like the training data it has been given. Also GPT 3 was trained using basically the entire internet. So almost anything you can google is something GPT 3 knows about, hence Ethos Hopper Clock.
For an AI, that doesn't even has eyes, has never played minecraft before it's still doing a rather dam good job. it's basically equivalent to asking your older brother who has never played minecraft and only heard about a farm like this how to build it.
@@jazziiRed I just asked it about a very simple clock design, and it said it was a pulse extender, then *almost* correctly described how it worked (including how it repeated the signal, which would make it a clock not a pulse extender, but since it had already written “pulse extender” it didnʼt notice the repeating would be infinite).
I think, ChatGPT has problems with Minecraft because Minecraft Tutorials are mostly on RUclips, which ChatGPT hasn't learned from. He probably only know the Wiki and some Reddit Posts
My interpretation of the farm chat gbt designed. Intended us to use a redstone repeater clock and have the hoppers be underneath the water source itself. Perhaps in the form of a water stream to collect the sugarcane. Basically, expecting us to fill in the blanks of the tutorial. By using our own imagination and our own knowledge about redstone contraption and farms
Exactly this. I bet if it could hook up pictures (undoubtably coming soon to an AI near you), it would have been much more coherent and much closer to an actual farm.
I'd be fascinated to see what an AI trained on redstone builds would construct. ChatGPT, for as impressive as it is, is in the end a text predictor, trying to model what it thinks the next word would be after whatever the last word it generated, so it wasn't really trained on redstone mechanisms. But if you make an ai who's training data is, say, the schematics of a ton of functional redstone machines, would it be able to produce more cohesive schematics and actually construct some redstone?
I made chat gpt come up with 10 difficulty levels of redstone and it's answers were really cool honestly but same issue, it couldn't explain or teach or problem solve in a practical way, imagine if it could? that would be so cool
the video's a good documentation that chatGPT is very efficient at searching up guides on the web, but it lacks on the application of redstone because realistically: redstoner's don't write any written guides on how to build a redstone contraption (so chatGPT won't have a source for those). though from my experience, it's more fun learning redstone through getting your hands dirty (trying and failing) instead of reading a bunch of useless online guides, and I encourage any newbie to do the same.
i now wish chatGPT wasnt georestricted. i learned that a comparator is a container measurer and a subtractor closest i can get to having chatgpt is bing ai
11:25 This is actually closer than it looks. If you connect the dust from the second torch back to the first block, instead of from the button to the second block, wouldn't it work? So, it was at least going in the right direction. Maybe give it a C- or D+?
@@jazziiRed That is true, I have been using ChatGPT since -2, and anytime I feel it is incorrect (even though we are trying not to interject or add bias etc.), I ask a simple clarification or follow up, which in 9/10 times delivers a more correct response
"for now atleast" sadly&thankfully yes as long that no one make it able to rebel we should be good, but that is a big if cuz there will always be people who want to program just to hurt others(like cheat and bot makers) so i wont be surprised if someone made a super advanced ai just to cause mayhem cuz as a wise man once said "some people just want to watch the world burn" BUT if that didnt happen it would be a great help in all sides of life and work
On level three, it seems like it got the wording messed up. If you just run the redstone dust into the OTHER block with a torch, it creates a single value RS Nor latch, an ancient way of making toggles. Their would actually have to be a button on each block, and it would mean that you can toggle the machine only by pressing the button on the side already giving an output, but that can easily be made into a t flip flop.
oh damn i remember these
yeah that might actually be what chat gpt found when it searched for that.
Good point. That might have been what it was going for
i just love how AIs confidently tell you incorrect things
Sounds like r/ConfidentlyIncorrect
its called lying
Well, the AI is programmed to train itself to sound smart, essentially.
It isn't actually smart; it doesn't actually have brain power.
Thus, Chat GPT and similiar AI models will eventually reach a limit to how good it gets before the small error rate it has limits its capabilities.
lmao fr
@@pandjammasbeeair2141not if it thinks it's right
Probab not, its gonna be like that mojang Survival guide
well its likely that part of its informations are directly from the survival guide lol
@@mauer1 yeah probably lmao, this was a guess before i watched the video lmfao
I think if you played around with the wordings you could make these somewhat work
Example 1: on step 3 using the redstone to connect the button to the other block instead of the one it's on.
Example 2: on step 4, placing the hopper trench adjacent to the water trench and using the repeaters for a repeater clock(thus experimenting with timings).
I'd be interested to see what happens if you first establish a language for communicating redstone designs, and then asked it to design something. I have a feeling it would perform a lot better.
The way AIs like chat GPT work is that they don't actually understand what they are saying. They know how the human language is constructed, and know how to string words together in a way that imitates human writing. But they don't know what the actual words mean. The AI doesn't know that redstone dust has signal strength, it just knows that from its training data the words "redstone dust" and "signal strength" are often related.
Essentially what this means is that they have no concept of truth or falsehood. So it will confidently lie to you, misrepresenting reality in odd but grammatically correct ways. So what you get is a complex mess of competently written details that sometimes get jumbled around based on what the AI thinks sounds most "human" or like the training data it has been given.
Also GPT 3 was trained using basically the entire internet. So almost anything you can google is something GPT 3 knows about, hence Ethos Hopper Clock.
I loved it
I really like how you did it in steps and analysed every part
For an AI, that doesn't even has eyes, has never played minecraft before it's still doing a rather dam good job. it's basically equivalent to asking your older brother who has never played minecraft and only heard about a farm like this how to build it.
There’s another possible level: analysis. Describe a machine and ask it what it does
Oooo that would definitely be interesting!
@@jazziiRed I just asked it about a very simple clock design, and it said it was a pulse extender, then *almost* correctly described how it worked (including how it repeated the signal, which would make it a clock not a pulse extender, but since it had already written “pulse extender” it didnʼt notice the repeating would be infinite).
@@danielrhouck I like your idea
Ah, but that was GPT-3. What about GPT-4?
Bro aint gonna pay 20 dollars monthly for gpt-4
Hey, he did a pretty decent job explaining redstone in text XD
I think, ChatGPT has problems with Minecraft because Minecraft Tutorials are mostly on RUclips, which ChatGPT hasn't learned from. He probably only know the Wiki and some Reddit Posts
next time, please tell the ai that it was a test and will be graded
Please make a part 2 with Aria (Opera AI)
Just realised the redstone dust in the channel's logo.
Where is the redstone philosophical question tho?
this is our fault, most people on internet is terrible at describing correctly what to do on text...
To be honest, you made up some bits of the tutorial
129th view, and I like vids
My interpretation of the farm chat gbt designed. Intended us to use a redstone repeater clock and have the hoppers be underneath the water source itself. Perhaps in the form of a water stream to collect the sugarcane.
Basically, expecting us to fill in the blanks of the tutorial. By using our own imagination and our own knowledge about redstone contraption and farms
Exactly this. I bet if it could hook up pictures (undoubtably coming soon to an AI near you), it would have been much more coherent and much closer to an actual farm.
I'd be fascinated to see what an AI trained on redstone builds would construct. ChatGPT, for as impressive as it is, is in the end a text predictor, trying to model what it thinks the next word would be after whatever the last word it generated, so it wasn't really trained on redstone mechanisms. But if you make an ai who's training data is, say, the schematics of a ton of functional redstone machines, would it be able to produce more cohesive schematics and actually construct some redstone?
Now I actually want someone to make this, that sounds like a cool AI...
I think based on other videos of what I saw, I think you should be teaching ai redstone and not the other way around 😂😂😂😂 amazing video as usual
the way you interpret level 3's instructions has the same energy as the people who play the games in mobile ads
VSauce reference xd 0:14
I made chat gpt come up with 10 difficulty levels of redstone and it's answers were really cool honestly but same issue, it couldn't explain or teach or problem solve in a practical way, imagine if it could? that would be so cool
This video didn't age well as I've asked gpt the last question abt the sugar cane farm and it gave me a flawless guide using observers
I want to see the iteration. Tell it. “It doesn’t work.” Literaly. That’s your prompt.
Bro I search up your name but instead get bad stuff opening up😢😢
the video's a good documentation that chatGPT is very efficient at searching up guides on the web, but it lacks on the application of redstone because realistically: redstoner's don't write any written guides on how to build a redstone contraption (so chatGPT won't have a source for those).
though from my experience, it's more fun learning redstone through getting your hands dirty (trying and failing) instead of reading a bunch of useless online guides, and I encourage any newbie to do the same.
I am a halfwit at redstone and could still make a better farm than that. Hoo boy, GPT.
i now wish chatGPT wasnt georestricted. i learned that a comparator is a container measurer and a subtractor
closest i can get to having chatgpt is bing ai
Congrats on the 1 mil views!
A little bit too soon. As of writing this, there are 999.900 views.
@@caspermadlener4191 19:10
Thank you! Seems I slightly jumped the gun on this, but it's probably gonna be today lol
@@jazziiRed Congratulations on 1 million views!
600th like
11:25 This is actually closer than it looks. If you connect the dust from the second torch back to the first block, instead of from the button to the second block, wouldn't it work? So, it was at least going in the right direction. Maybe give it a C- or D+?
You should have asked follow up questions.
Maybe, but that would have been a really long-winded video
@@jazziiRed That is true, I have been using ChatGPT since -2, and anytime I feel it is incorrect (even though we are trying not to interject or add bias etc.), I ask a simple clarification or follow up, which in 9/10 times delivers a more correct response
do a tutorial about old instant moving bugs
He's clearly not good at following ChatGPT's instructions.
I tried my best :,(
"for now atleast" sadly&thankfully yes as long that no one make it able to rebel we should be good, but that is a big if cuz there will always be people who want to program just to hurt others(like cheat and bot makers) so i wont be surprised if someone made a super advanced ai just to cause mayhem cuz as a wise man once said "some people just want to watch the world burn"
BUT if that didnt happen it would be a great help in all sides of life and work