Thanks for all the feedback folks! The lenses I use to shoot stills and videos with this camera are: Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC Canon 70-200 f2.8 II IS Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS Canon 10-18 f4.5-5.6 IS STM
James I also shoot with the Tamron 24 -70 2.8 VC for wedding filming and I find it a great combination. The VC in that lens is incredible. I am able to go mostly handheld which I had never contemplated before. Think I might get the Atomos Ninja now to complete the set up. The clean HDMI out is so under utilised. I also have to add sharpnessi n post but I find the image quite Cinematic with the slight softness.
@@MrMcshaft It's a fantastic lens and I absolutely advocate the use of an Atomos Ninja Blade/2. It's not a night and day difference, but it does make cleaning up a noisy image easier, especially if you're using Red Giant Denoiser
@@stevecoke34 I haven't actually shot anything with the Canon 17-55 as I've had the Sigma 17-50 since I got my 7D Mark II. I've got a friend who shoots both stills and video with the 17-55 and it's never off of the camera, it's their go-to lens
I have been using my 7d ii for 5 years and I am still loving it. I take pictures of hummingbird. The auto focus is great. This is the only camera that I feel no upgrade is needed.
Yes I think you are absolutely correct when you said that you don’t need all that new stuff if your camera do the job why spending money I also have Canon 70d, Sony a7r, Sony a6000,and Nikon d7200 and I am totally happy with everything I have
I have had my 7D mkii for three years as I have to say it’s an absolute workhorse! Portraits product landscapes weddings sports wildlife(not so much though!) time-lapse macro and long exposures, what ever I’ve thrown at it it’s done a fantastic job. The menu for the focusing(sports/wildlife) is quite challenging t get your head around but once I got use to it my photos got pin sharp. Will I ever part with it?....yes but only if the 7D mklll is mirrorless. If they bring out another mirrorless full frame with better specs than the 7D mkll then I’ll get that & keep my 7D2.
Thanks for the video James, even though it's taken me two years to see it. This week I got my first 7DMk2. It is a welcome addition to two classic (but very old) 7D cameras. The reason I got this one in 2020 is mostly as you explained in your video. For US$700, a Magnesium Alloy weather sealed Canon APSC with 20MPixels, 65 Focus Points in Dual Pixel, and both SD/CF card storage at 10fps, along with both Mic and Headphone jacks, is a great device for the price. As with everything else it is a tool for the job, so if your needs are 4k, this camera is worthless. But if you photograph on the go, and need something on a budget that will fit your existing lenses, this seemed to me like the obvious contender. Cheers.
thanks for the intel on the 7D mark II i still use mine with sigma lense 18-35mm 1.8 and the cam performs still very huge , is one of my favorite DSLR'S
I too own the 7DM2, carry it around with its own proprietary battery grip and a substancial 70-200 F2.8 IS II, a Sigma 18-35 F1.8 and a 24-70 F2.8, you gotta admit tho, the fact that you can write to two cards and the ability to record clean HDMS 8 bit, does make this crop sensor flagship camera from Canon, a worthy rival to newer mirror less cameras though...I still love my 7DM2.
It’s a fine camera. I have one for 3 years and it has not let me down. The things for what I would upgrade mine is image quality, sharpness and more megapixels.
Now its 2021 and i still got my 7D mk2. I dont do any video though, but mostly nature photography, often with birds in some kind of action. I truly love that camera and i dont see any reason to change at the moment.
Thanks for posting James. I am a professional photojournalist. I also shoot everything from product photography to wildlife for various clients. The 7D MKII is my go-to camera. I have yet to find anything good enough to replace it. Except for the rumored to be coming soon 7D MKIII.
My pleasure Chad. It's such a versatile camera that its hard to knock it down apart from it's video features. I often consider jumping over to Sony for video but I can't justify it yet with the quality I get in stills from my 7D Mark II. I too am going to hold on for the 7D Mark III and see what it brings to the party as I was more than a little disappointed by the EOS R.
I have had this camera for a few years. I have kennel of hunting dogs and I'm always in the outdoors looking for action shot. I may have taken 25,000 photos and I love this camera. I have a canon 7--200 f4 and set the shutter at 1000, and everything works great. Very sharp photos. I edit in LR. The Camera is super tuff, I mean over the top. I had a dog once grab the strap and pull the camera off a table and drag it over rocks. I simply love this camera. 40 years now, and this is by far the best I've ever owned or used.
It is extremely tough and can pretty much deal with any situation that's thrown at it. Very impressive it survived being dragged off a table by the dog though!
I bought the 7d mark II in january 2015. I use it for travel, family, concerts and sports mainly with EF28-300mm L IS USM, Tamron 2.8/24-70VC and EF-S 10-18mm. Great! The only camera I'd like to have are the 5dIII or IV, especially for concerts. Remarkably the 7dII does no get cheaper, indeed the actual prize is about 100-150€ more than 2015.
Hi James thanks for making the informative video. Could I ask for you opinion please on a 7D mk2 verses the 6D mk2? I have the 7D mk1 and wish to upgrade. Firstly I am not interested in the video side of things. My bug bear with my 7D is the low light, I figure whatever I buy now will be a lot better. I have had my eye on the full frame 6D mk2 and read a lot of not great reviews, but they all seem to be comparing from a 5D mk4 perspective, and not from a crop to full frame perspective. Or after watching your video I go buy a 7D mk2 . I am aware of selling my EFS lenses if I go full frame. I mostly photograph weddings, bands and landscape. Thanks for your insight.
When the 6D Mark II was announced I too was a little disappointed - not by the specs, but after watching the camera stores review of it and seeing that dynamic range wasn't good at all, in fact I think it was a bit worse in some instances. While it's probably about 1 stop better in low light (I'm going from my experience of owning an original 6D before I swapped to the 7D Mark II). What you get from the 7D Mark II, much like the 7D is those great ergonomics. The dual card slots, the faster shutter and if you're already baked into EFS glass then jumping to full frame unless you're going switch glass will be pricey. The 7D Mark II has limited availability since Canon are slowing down production so I imagine at MKIII version is on the way. How soon do you want to make the change?
Personally for me, the single card slot is a bit of a deal breaker these days but when I had an original 6D, I never had a card fail on me. Weddings and landscapes I'd probably say the 6D Mark II - if you have the cash for full frame lenses but just be very aware that it's only a single card slot. In defence of the 7D Mark II, I comfortably use it up to ISO 3200 during event photography.
Hi James thanks for the reply. I would like to purchase before Christmas. I wish to sell my original 7D to fund the new camera. I only have the 10 - 22 EFs lens. The other lenses are EF. I may go for the 7D mk 2 because of your review. 👍.
Did i hear right, you shoot portraits at f8 ? I did notice that subject's face details are all in focus in your sample shown in the video... I am interested in this particularity, obvious benefits comes such as more details, more sharpness from using sweet spot of lenses But challenges also, like background separation might be trickier, light amount required. Thank you for the video, it was very interesting. I shoot with 90D, I am still very fascinated to see the differences with this legendary pro apsc body ! If only Canon recycled the best of both 80D and 7D II !
Ah this is something that is subjective. When talking about shooting portraits in this video, I'm referring to controlled studio environments. Then shooting at F8 is preferred due to the power available from strobes. In practice and in outdoor portraits, I'd say I used to aim more for F4 if I could because then I did get some background separation but for me, I like the subjects face to be in focus from the nose to the eyes to the ears - it's just a preference for me.
Hi James, great vlog thanks. I think I am nr-ish you, was that Coate water? I got the 7d mk2 in the summer at the Swindon Outlet for a good price and love it, seeing this vid shows me that it was a good buy and can do so much more I have tried so far. I have not tried much video yet, but will. I love that it is an all rounder. Your comments about fast standard zooms was great, had been thinking of a wider zoom 10-22 maybe, time will tell. Will check out your other vlogs, once again thanks for your posts.
You are right Jeff that is indeed Coate Water. I haven't tried the 10-22mm, only the 10-18mm and I get really good results with it, very surprising results seeing as it's a relatively cheap wide angle lens. Let me know which one you go for and how you get on with it :-)
Excellent review. I shot with the original 7D for many years, skipped the 7DII, thinking that the III would be out soon, but that hasn't been the case. Got an 80D as an interim 2nd camera. Still waiting to see where everything settles in the camera world.
Its definitely all up in the air at the moment in terms of cameras Paula. The 80D is a good "little" camera, very nearly bought one myself at one point but then they announced the EOS R - I didn't get that either! Thanks for watching :-)
hi.. very informative video.. thanks.. a quick question.. we have a black friday sale(nov 19) for the 7d mark 2 for £1000 (body only) is it priced reasonably?
Funny how I came to this on RUclips Good price I’d agree and I just found a body for $800. I am trying to upgrade affordably from a Sony A57 from like 6 years ago ? I was thinking about the M50 but then I started seeing these 7d Mark ii for 8-1000 What’s anybody think between the 2 ? 🧐
A very good overview of this long running camera. It's as tough as old boots, like Nikon's D3. But now is the time to only buy one secondhand, as it makes no sense to pay new retail price, compared to the price of much newer, better spec, mirrorless cameras like the G9, XT-3, or Canon's own Rp and R.
Great video mate, im coming off an canon t3i with an L series 24-105mm usm lens (i shoot mountain biking both video and stills). I was wondering if id be better off with the 90d at $2000 AUD or a used 7d mark ii at $1000 AUD and spending the difference on some audio or lens upgrades?
I'd probably go with the 90D now as the sensor, the chips and the tech are all much better than they were in 2014. I think the 24-105 is still a solid lens for that. It you've got some budget for audio, go invest!
Hi James, how about the 7Dmk2 against the now released 90D, how does it stack up? i am still using the old 7D mk1 and i often wonder do i go and get a 90d or a 7Dmk2. i only shoot photos, i am not into video or blogging or anything like that, just action, animal and macro images - any suggestions on what to do? If only there was a 7Dmk3 on the horizon
Hi Erich, apologies for the late reply on this one! I think the 90D has a lot of new features but the AF on the 7D Mark II still seems to best it, judging from the reviews from DP Review and The Camera Store TV. You'll also get the megapixel bump from the 90D. I need to get one to do a test of it and see how it compares.
Thank you! While I've not posted a new video for a little bit, I've got a couple of very in-depth camera videos coming up but they are not Canon cameras 😉. Thanks for subbing!
Great review! - I shoot professionally with the Canon 7D mark II and love it!.. I had a 5D Mark III before and for some reason I prefer the 7D II!. Love the dual Digic 6 processors.. the colors... the speed and the focusing system, greatly!. The only reason I'd ever change would be to go to the 7D Mark III - Hopefully it will have an articulated screen (much better for Real Estate Photography in those tight corners.. will save my knees too being 6'6" lol) Have considered the Sony A7R III for the low noise and greater detail in large landscape images and for the sharp 4k video.. but out of my price range... Like the Canon 24-105 F4L IS.. the Canon 7D Mark II is an awesome all-rounder!
It is a great all rounder! I've spent the last week or so working with a Sony A7RII and an A7S II and the handling on them is atrocious to me. As much as Canon might hold back on some features, their ergonomics are beyond reproach. Have you had any experience with the Sigma 24-105mm on your 7D Mark II?
@@jw_film It really is!.. I have held a couple of Sony's and you're right.. they don't feel so much, a part of your hand as the 7D II does seem to feel. I haven't personally used the sigma as yet... :) Used to have the Tamron 24-70 2.8 DI VC and did like it on the 7D II. My everyday is the trusty 24/105 F4L IS aforementioned in my first post. I also have the EFS 10-22mm for real estate and the EFS 60mm F2.8 Macro for detail shots, macro and some portrait work.
@@StachR34 I traded in my 24-105 for the Tamron and 4 years on its still great. The VC makes it brilliant for video. I'm not sure there will be another camera like the 7D Mark II again!
@@jw_film Agree with you on the above! :) I do wish the 24-105 was a little sharper at F4! I sold my 24/70 Tamron (Not that I wanted to) with the rest of my gear 3 years ago, just before I got the 7D II and 10-22mm. All i need is the articulated screen and I'd be a happy camper for a long time! :)
I own the 7d mark 2 and just love it.. the video didn't mention how built like tank this camera can be taken to war zone. The images u get from Canon lens are superb. I only get cannon L lens b cause I like the stablization for fast shooting without tripod. The Canon lens are also very tough and weather sealed. Take this beast in any weather . I would only upgrade with another camera with faster shutter speed. 10 fps ! It's 2 card slot built in time laspe . Only thing I upgrade if they come out with faster than 60fps video and still have the specs of more than 7 mark 2 ... This camera 20 Meg is more than you need. Reason why 7 mark 2 owners have nothing but great things to say about this camera . I will be long time before I upgrade .
It is indeed built like a tank! The only reason I am considering switching mine as a b camera for video is that it's video is quite soft. As a stills camera, I am going to be using this for the foreseeable future because it is just fantastic!
The EOS 7D is an outdoor DSLR. It is rugged and pretty much bullet proof. I have dropped my 7D 3 different times due to the strap that comes with it, simply does not work well. The camera received only a scratch where the strap loop is. By the way each time it fell to the sidewalk. I have since remedied the problem, due to the fact my passion is landscape photography, usually shooting in storms and rivers. The camera's ruggedness goes beyond any other camera on the market. This is why the 7D is still a very popular camera I believe. I love to walk into a camera shop and find them in used condition, because I can pick them up for very little. I don't use it for video so I don't care about it's lack of features in that respect. Keep shooting, and remember, "Don't fix what still works."
Great vid James, so I've still been using my 7D Mark I for smaller jobs and borrowing my buddies 5D Mark IV for bigger shoot's whenever he isn't using it, but need I to upgrade on my own badly , is it wise to buy a 7D Mark II now, hold off for a Mark III or buy the 80D? What do ya think? I foolishly bought a Canon M6 for a trip and hate it, wish I would have gone with the M5 instead, oh well .
Hmm, a tricky one. I'd be tempted if I was in your position to look at the EOS R, especially if you're doing more video. The video is much sharper than what you get on the 80D and with its crop in 4K, it feels like an 80D. In stills though, it's essentially a 5DMKIV so you'll know what you're getting from it. I can't think it will be long before a 90D comes round the corner. Do you shoot more stills or more video?
@@jw_film Stills, and I actually borrow my buddies 5DMKIII, anyway thanks for your input I appreciate it, but am staying away from the EOS R until later versions...
@@spoilst Completely understandable and I am as well. The EOS R is a little way away from being ideal for a lot of situations. The 80D is great choice if you're just doing stills and don't mind losing the joystick.
I own a 7D2 long time ago and recently I purchased EOS R. I think EOS R is a good complementary to 7D2 but cannot replace 7D2. The EVF is great, and R have a higher resolution and definitely have a better image quality than 7D2. And R is the first canon's full-frame camera that could use EF-S lenses, so the EF-S lenses that used on my 7D2 could be used on R with an adapter, which is one of the main reason I chose R. But R has much lower (5/s vs 10/s) rate in continuous shooting mode (with servo focus), and I think the continuous auto focus in photo and video is worse than 7D2. And R just cannot record 1080p60 video on a EF-S lens, but 7D2 can. R: Good for landscape and portrait. And the RF lens is great, but can only be used on R currently. Have the ability to record 4K video, and with a EF-S lens, the crop in 4K doesn't really matter. Low light is better than 7D2 since it is a full-frame. Better than 5D4 but cheaper. 7D2: Good for sports (and much better than R). And the video is enough in most cases. The video in both of these two camera is a bit soft (when using +0 sharpness), but you can add sharpness by using some software or change the color profile settings. And I think I won't need a 7D3 because 7D2 is enough. 7D to 7D2 is a big update (and 7D is my first DSLR), but I don't think 7D3 will have big updates. And when it comes to ISO performance, full-frame is definitely better than APS-C.
One of the things I didn't get to test on the R was the slow motion. If I was looking for a purely stills camera and I was coming up from the lower APS-C line-up then the R absolutely makes sense but ergonomically it kept fighting me. I'd happily give up the swipe bar for a joystick! I sadly shoot far more video than stills so the R is going to be a miss for me this time around. When did you get your R?
To me it still is, Its one of my main cameras I use mine mainly for motorsports, events and sometimes portraits in fact I use it for just about everything and it can do time-lapse and other things too I love mine. I also own a SL2 aka 200D for those times I want to use a smaller camera, most time I use it to shoot video,
Hi Erich. In terms of video, yes the 7D Mark II is well past its prime now. In terms of stills, I still think the 7D Mark II has a place. Certainly as a wildlife camera, it pretty much has no match in terms of other canon DSLR's. It AF system is still vastly surperior to the new 90D from my understanding of how the AF points are laid out. Also, other than the 1DX III and 5D IV, there aren't any other cameras in their stills line-up with dual card slots (which I feel is mandatory, especially for my own work). In terms of a 7D MK III, I wish there would be but i think the 7D MK II might be the end of the line for this series.
I use mine, along with my 5DIII, all the time and I’ve no intention of upgrading either until they can no longer function. I don't shoot video and it has no interest to me, mainly because I have a permanent respiratory condition and no one wants to hear my strider. I also drop digital cameras quite frequently so I need something tough. My 7DII tumbled about 12 feet down a rocky embankment into the edge of Buttermere, where it stayed for about 5 minutes until I could get there. (I never sell kit because of its treatment) The 10fps has enabled me to get some great shots such as an Osprey just catching a trout on Loch Lowes. Because I never shoot wildlife with any of my analogue cameras I think it’s safe to say that after my retired 5DII (over 200k clicks and still hell of a camera) my 7DIII is my most used digital camera.
James Watts I’m not anti progress such as mirrorless etc, and I certainly recommend them wanting their first decent system. But it’s the build of the titanium bodies and weather proofing that will keep me with the dslr cameras for now. The weight also makes things easier for me because with the battery grip it balances my large lens, though I fit it to my gimbal head on my knee and push it upright with my mobility scooter. I’ve subscribed by the way.
So now in 2019 what are your thoughts? I'm looking to upgrade from a t5i for more professional shoots like music videos and shorts. Is a 7D mark ii still worth it or should I go for the EOS R? Really great video!
If its video that you are going for and want to stay with Canon, the EOS R is a much better bet than the 7D Mark II (which has sadly been discontinued by Canon as of May 2019). I enjoyed my time with the EOS R. For me it wasn't what I needed at all so for video I've gone for the GH5S as it ticked all the boxes, especially when compared with a speedbooster. The EOS R does have the variable ND adapter which is enviable. What kind of music videos are you looking to make/currently make?
@@jw_film thanks for the advice I'll keep that in mind. What was it about the EOS R that didn't quite do it for that the GH5S does? With the additional costs of the mirror less I'm trying to weigh the pros and cons and get all the information I can get. I've done hip hop and folk, as well as doing live bands, and weddings
@@althentik For me it was range of codecs available, 10 Bit 422 colour in both 4K and 1080P and the overall practicality over other mirrorless options. I can add XLR's using the adapter, dual card slots and a proper waveform. As a video camera, it makes a lot of sense but it's not a great stills camera - for stills I'm still using my 7D Mark II but I find I'm rarely shooting with that outside of a studio or without strobes now.
would you still recommend it in 2019? I want to buy a camera kit for < $2000, Mirrorless or DSLR doesn't matter, but I want a camera that shoots excellent stills for that price.
I love my 7d2 however i switched to sony (a7m3) i still keep my 7d2 for wilflife i love it iwth my Tammy 70-200 VC (gen1) and my Canon 400mm f5.6 L and 300 f4 L IS. But.. if there are affordable lenses for sony like a 400 f5.6 or better a 500 f5.6 i am leaving my 7d2 but for now ..
Sony are definitely improving their lens line-up all the time and it's not going to be long before Canon aren't ahead in that market, but instead competing. Their new RF range of lenses are fantastically sharp, Its just a shame that the EOS R is a bit of a half-baked camera
I just went back to my Canon 7D because I like the built quality and the 18 megapixels is more then enough for professional prints. Rather then worry about new technology I'd rather put on good glass and focus on working on my skills. I also have the 7DMII which is like new.
As an original 7D user this title triggered me :’) On a note of relevance to today: other than having survived every possible scenario (from glaciers to tropic weather), as long as you know how to work with light and got good glass: why upgrade if Canon doesn’t produce interesting cameras anyway?
I think Canon do produce interesting cameras, Its just that they are usually handicapped in one way other another. The 7D Mark II to me feels like a camera they purposefully didn't handicap, especially at its time of release.
James Watts that’s a fair point. I remember buying it then because it seemed like such a step-up from my 500D. I have just grown disillusioned by recent releases when compared to Sony specifically, but right now even Nikon.
@@UNLouise I'm with you there. The EOS R was a big flop to me and I've been working with more and more event photographers who are making the switch from Canon to Sony
Hi, After searching to upgrade I have narrowed my search down to the 4d mark II. Its the frame rate and the focus system that has it for me. How do the canon L series lenses perform on this body. Many thanks and great video.
I have the Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L lens and it performs brilliantly. All of the portraits in the video are taken with that lens and the results are stunningly sharp and the autofocus performance is second to none.
I've had my 7D Mark II for almost 3 years, mainly for wildlife. I was always very happy with it, especially that burst rate (which is surprising quiet). Last March I bought a 5D Mark IV for landscapes. The image quality and dynamic range of that FF is miles better. I recently shot wildlife with it. Its burst isn't as fast as the 7DM2 and the mirror flip sounds like ... well, a cannon. So it's not ideal for wildlife. But the image quality has spoiled me. So. I'm looking to upgrade the 7DM2 but not with another 5D. The R needs faster burst and full Servo capacity. If the next R ups those specs, or the 7DM3 spec rumors are close to true, that's when I'll move on from my trusty 7DM2.
I won't lie, I've been sorely tempted by the 5D Mark IV a number of times. If I was just using a camera for stills, then I would drop the cash for it. Of course we can all hope the 7D Mark III is on its way in 2019
@@jw_film I have both and shoot mostly wildlife. Since getting the 5D4, I now use that most of the time, as the image quality and low light performance is far better. I can also crop more, which is often necessary with wildlife, even with 500 + 1.4 extender. The autofocus is the same as the 1DX mk 2 and I like the new lever on the back that changes the focusing zones, making it much easier to use there too.
Hello, I want to get into photography particularly fashion photoshoots. Between the Canon 7D mark ii, Canon 77D and the recent Canon 800D, which one would you recommend I go for?
Today I'd probably go with either the 7D MARK II or the 77D. If you are using strobes, then the 7D Mark II makes more sense as I think it has a higher sync speed. You'll also have more control over autofocus but you won't have the flip out screen.
Thabang Oupa Maila I have the 7DII which I use for wildlife that I love, but if I was buying a camera for fashion today I’d go 80D. It’s a better newer sensor and about £200 cheaper.
Great video and a good summary. I'm looking to get back into my photography and have the opportunity now to get a new body. I take my pictures of wildlife, pets and often landscapes but also will be getting into more portraits with my family. When I think about photo's I've mostly missed sharpness on when I've been back on the PC it's been the wildlife and scenery when on coastal routes around Wales or on safari. I've been investigating online and bounced from 7D mark ii, 6D mark ii, 80D, always seem to circle back to the 7D mark ii. Head-scratching times!
It's always a massive head scratcher! I think the body will depend on what lenses you have (or are planning to get). Are you looking at EF or EF-S lenses?
@@jw_film I currently have the following EF lens: 70-200 L USM, 70-300 Sigma APO DG and a 50mm prime that's now past its best alongside a Tamron 17-35. I loved my old 28-105 but that, like a lot of my old kit, has pretty much had it now. Since most of these were budget buys I'd be looking at upgrading these as I can. I've no issue really going EF or EF-S.
@@jw_film I need to do some exploration but definitely looking at getting a good lens for portraits and a good workhorse lens. My 50mm prime 1.8 was struggling to focus last few uses and my 28-105 has some dust in the glass. I'm always open to recommendations :)
I have the canon 7d mark II and I have used it with the atomos ninja II, but I have not managed to see any difference, only bigger files, then I tried to apply the grading and it was practically the same. I think I'm doing something wrong.
I don't think you're doing anything wrong. You're not going to see a world of difference between the internal 8 bit 4:2:0 codec and the Ninja's 8 bit 4:2:2 - it certainly isn't night and day (and that was something I found disappointing at first). The difference that I saw is how noise is processed in the clips, as the Ninja's ProRes are a lot less compressed. I find it allows me to do a much easier noise clean up at higher ISO's and retain more sharpness and colour informaiton. What was the situation you were using the Ninja in?
Hi. Im using the 7d atm, for bird and sport mostly. I loose allot of shots brcause i miss the focus on birds in flight. Will the image quality be allot better on the 7Dii as well as the tracking, or will it be more the same ?
The Mark II introduced the dual pixel af which is still fantastic. I can't say I've tried to shoot with birds in flight but I did a show jumping competition about a month or so ago and 90% of shots are tack sharp using a 70-200mm.
The T2I was a great starting camera for me, it enabled me to build upon my skills and prepared me to step up. What are you shooting with your t2i at the moment that makes you feel like you need to step up to the 90d?
James Watts I shoot mainly stills with a bit of video on the side, the video on the t2i is not great along with the photo resolution at only 18 mp so I can’t crop in. The iso on the t2i is unusable I can’t go more than 800
I photograph rock concerts, sports, landscape and travel. Last year I upgraded from the 7dII APS-C to the 5dIII full frame. But I am a little bit disappointed with the 5dIII because the 7dII is too good. Only at ISO 6400 and 12800 the 5dIII has significant advantages. The AF fields of the 7dII are better distributed to the edges and it is a kalashnikow at 10fps. Love both and don't know why I should switch to Sony oder a Canon R.
I was of the same opinion. You're not going to get better AF performance from the EOS R although it does have more AF points, it's nothing like the 10FPS on the 7D Mark II. I still have my 7D Mark II and it's still my go-to stills camera. Have you looked at whether the 5D MKIV might be a better fit than the MKIII?
@@jw_film Of course I'd like to own the 5dIV. But it is still too expensive just for hobby. I found a used 5dIII in 2019 at a reasonable price (800€). Now I'll spend my money on good lenses.
EDIT: bought a Tamron 150-600mm G2 for wildlife. And I love the 7d mkII more then ever. Good to have a crop factor for far distances and small birds. Now I'm dreaming of a R5. This one could realy replace the 7d mkII and my 5d mkIII
Am very interested in this Canon 7D MKII. Trying to upgrade from an older Nikon D90. Does Canon offer courses in the U.S. West Coast which new owners can take to learn how to use this camera and get the most from it? Will the hot shoe allow me to connect to Novatron Strobe lights?
Hi Norman, I'm pretty sure there are courses in your local area (I'm in the UK so any course I reccomended wouldn't be easy to get to for you I fear! On the second count, again I don't know as I haven't used that particular strobe myself but I'll do some digging and try to find out for you.
Might be worth holding on for the 7D mkIII which is due next year. Even if you still plan on a 7D mkII the new release will mean a massive drop in price for the older model.
What are your thoughts on the 5d mkiv and a replacement or an addition to your 7D mk2, I also own a 7D mk2 and struggling to come to a conclusion, yes I like the look and how the Sony A7iii is working especially in low light, but I know while I use canon glass, there are compromises to be made, and while I do take low light party shots we are looking to do more wedding photo shoots, with the odd video, your thoughts please
The 5D MKIV I think is a good upgrade to the 7D Mark II but I wouldn't say it's a substantial upgrade. I've spent the week with a guy shooting on MKIV's and he would go up to 6400 ISO and no further as he knew he wouldn't be able to recover the images. The AF though is still fantastic. Sadly I think there Will Always be a compromise and I weigh the options up myself about what to switch to.
I am absolutely in love with this camera. I bought it about a year ago while i was waiting anxiously for the 7D MK3 to be announced. I am so glad i got it because the MK3 is still yet to be announced and it doesn't even have a release date in view. The only issue i have with it is a hard time with the white balance. Usually i go to Kelvin and adjust the number according to the light. In a yellowish light AWB is terrible.
Glad you are having a good time with the 7D Mark II! I haven't actually experienced that problem when I do auto white balance but I'm normally at a fixed WB for shooting. When does it go yellow most often?
@@jw_film you know those street lights that have yellow light? I shoot on weddings and in the evening when im out of the hall that light is killing my shots. Took me a long time to figure out the right Kelvin numbers but i manage pretty good now. I also shoot some lightning shots. That too, i need to adjust the WB to K because on auto it is horible. Here is my profile from gurushots. Check it out... gurushots.com/predatoo/photos
hi, good day, i need help please, i sometimes take my 7d markii to do video clis of 5 to 15 minutes but it cannot fit on facebook, what can i do, greate video
heyy james! just wondering. does the 7d mark ii allows you to record VIDEO simultaneously to both cards? i know that it can record simultaneously for photo, but does it allow you to record video to both cards at the same time (as in backup option)? thanks!
Hi Imran, unfortunately video is only recorded to one of the cards not both. If you want a back-up, what ive always done is plugged in an Atomos recorder which gives me that safer back-up.
Heyy thanks man. I assume that with an external recorder like the atomos, the camera can record simultaneously to one of the internal memory card slot and to the atomos as well? Thanks again for the info James!
@@ImranTalib It can indeed record to one of cards at the same time as an external recorder. It doesn't matter which card slot either although I've found ive not been able to select which one.
I am new to photography and bought myself an EOS 1100D but as a beginner I still feel like an upgrade, I like wildlife photography and find 3fps to slow, I have seen a second hand 7D for sale which I think would be better, any thoughts as money is tight.
I'd say if you can afford to get the 7D Mark II, you'll see a considerable upgrade in AF performance. While the 1100D is an entry level camera, it's still very powerful. I started with a 600D and learning that camera first and what it could do taught me that the lenses I had were what I needed to upgrade first. What lenses are you currently using with your 1100D?
Being relevant in 2018 is a matter of perspective. The acceptance of the many shortcomings meant that the bar was set very low in order to remain relevant. This video is presented as a feel good about a product which is long in the tooth. It was nicely produced but does little to convince me that Canon wishes to retain their user base by failing to update this model.
Hello James, my wife does newborn photography and maternity. Mainly in the studio and outside on the beach and in the forest. Yesterday our 70d broke we bought 3 years ago and we need a new camera. The shutter broke and we have no time to fix it. Which camera would you advise? Our stuff is all canon. We don't do any video. Can't spend to much so I was thinking either 80d or 7d mark 2 or 6d mark 2. I know very little about cameras.
Hi Marcus, really sorry to hear that! It's always a pain when something breaks and it's always at the worst possible moment. For familiarity and to get you back on your feet again, I think the 80D is going to be the safest option. Unless you have a lot of full frame lenses then the 6D Mark II might benefit you more but in terms of handling they are both almost identical. Personally I'd go for the 80D if I was in your shoes.
Hi, I have upgraded from my eos 7d original to 7Dii. Mainly for the increase in AF points and better iso performance. I did use my 7D a lot for video until I got a NEX5R, what great little camera. My question is the dual pixel accurate and fast enough to film at an airshow or motor sport event ! ?
Tyson, I worked at a recent Air Show and looking at the magazine guys and the guys shooting for websites many of them were using the 7DMkii and I have use mine many times to shoot motorsports events truthfully any camera with fast autofocus and a high frame rate will do that I used to have a Sony a6000 and even with the 16-50 kit lens on it shooting action was no problem. The 7Dmkii is actually made for sports, did you know it has an anti-flicker function to handle stadium lights? also just my opinion get memory card with a high MB/s rates I use SanDisk Extreme Pro SD card and UDMA CF cards I put the camera on high continuous shutter and AF servo and just track an airplane doing it loops and turns no problem the camera just goes on working.
@@bikecommuter24 Hi Donald Thanks for the info. I am aware of anti flicker option on the 7Dii. I do use extreme pro CF & SD cards. I have set C1 dial to video settings, 1/50, AF Servo, ISO 100, standard Pic Style. I take a Rode Mic with me as well and the audio is pretty good. Now I have the 7Dii I do not have to worry about setting focus or having high f stop to allow movement with a depth of field zone. I have a zoom ring lever clamped on the Tele zoom 70-300 L lens so I can move focal length smoothly. I do enjoy using the 7Dii on shoots.
@@tysonator5433 No need to worry that is this camera's best feature AF is among the best, I usually just set my camera to AF Servo and I 'm good. f stops I'm usually f8 or so just depends sometimes I may add a ND filter you know bright noon light, white ramps planes flying into the sun not ideal lighting conditions for taking photos, I usually take a few test shots before just to make sure. And sometimes I may even put my camera on Auto I know blasphemy from the manual crowd lol. I also set my camera to Case 1 (Menu, AF screen 1) I may try some of the other just to see. I been shooting for a few years and I'm always learning new stuff all the time what works today might be totally different tomorrow. hopes this helps.
Undeniably the worst thing about the 7D Mark II is the exposure meter. Why be fine in aputure priority mode but then be this squished small bar on the right hand side for no reason at all. Drives me nuts!
Hey James I am wondering if you could help me out. I want a good mix of both video and image quality. I have a few options presented to me and would like to know which would be the best option for price and quality. First option is a 1d mIV with a EF 17-40mm F/4L with hood and two lenses an additional battery and a charger for $850. The next option is a 80d with a 18-135 mm lens for $680 both are in great condition please let me know thanks!
Personally if it was me, I would go for the 80D and the 18-135 option because you'll get a greater range of shots with that less (yes its not an L lens but its a great starting point) and with the 80D you'll get the newer Dual Pixel Auto Focus. What would you be getting the camera to shoot primarily? Wildlife/Landscapes/Portraits?
I've watch some of your video, No idea why you still have 211 subs and under 1k views per video. You should have at least 20-30k subs. RUclips algorithms sucks.
It's an algorithm I am still learning how to use. Sadly there isn't an instruction manual. Thanks for saying so mate, it makes the hard work worth it :-)
I don't think 90D or 80D is replaced for 7d mark ii. What is negative feedback for 7d mark ii?. Shall I buy now for 7d mark ii. It's good choice still in 2020? For wildlife.
I still think the 7D Mark II is a great choice for wildlife. Great AF performance and coverage, dual card slots and the image quality is still great for stills (for video its lacking now). Its weakest point is ISO performance but anything under 3200 ISO still looks great!
I have shot at 6400 ISO with my 7D mkii for low light Event photography. With the new upgrade to Lightroom and posting images online, this has not been an issue. Even in print they are not bad considering low light has historically always had noise and has been improving, but yet is still very acceptable. Learning to use WB adjustment modes in low light really propels the limits of the camera.
For stills I do go to 6400 from time to time when it's online delivery but 3200 is about as high as I would want to go for print. What type of events do you use your 7D Mark II for?
@@jw_film Personal Growth, Small Biz Dev, Entrepreneur. Many times in low light situations, which has me looking at Full frame cameras as well as for astro and landscape that I would like to do. However I shoot portraits, events and products all on my 7D mkii. I forgot to mention I am rarely below 1/125, try to get to 1/160 with nothing more than F/4 all without Flash. If I need to do a group shot then I get to up to 7.1 with a flash and a wide angle.
Is it relevant? Absolutely...I use it to take wildlife photos all the time. It's still a great choice for wildlife photographers using the canon system if you can't afford the Canon 1dx mark ii. A better question is should you still buy it in Dec 2018? The answer there is probably...Not if you can wait a little longer for the successor or alternatively you can get it at a really discounted price today and don't mind using older tech.
How much longer do you think it will be before the 7d mark iii comes out? Im wondering if i should pick up a used 7d Mk ii, and then just upgrade it when the new one comes out.
I would guess the 7d mark III or whatever canon chooses to call their new crop sensor sports / wildlife shooter is likely to come out in late 2019. I have a feeling it's going to be a mirror-less system. For that reason I would not buy a 7d mark ii this year unless you get it for 50 - 60% discounted price. It simply isn't worth investing in DSLR tech that is already more than 4 years old at this point. There is also a good chance that in a year or two the 7d mark ii will be discontinued. I would continue to rent if you are looking to use the system on a part time basis and then invest when the new models arrive late 2019 before the 2020 Olympic games.
Hey! Cool overview! Just subbed and I have a question... I have started doing dog photography with my canon 750D. Would the 7d mkii have better IQ performance than my current camera? I understand the other advantages such as build quality, great 10fps vs 5, auto focus points etc... From a specific IQ perspective though, how do they fare? I mainly use the new sigma sport 70-200 f2.8 as my main lens due to working distance and speed. When you say once the focus is locked on it's awesome, would it be better than the 750d I use? Thanks
I think image quality wise they are pretty equally matched. It's the same sensor but like you say it's the autofocus and fps that separates them. Are you having any problems using the 750D or are you happy with the stills you're getting?
@@jw_film nah I'm well happy with the stills quality. Just with it being 24mp vs 20mp just wanted to make sure the IQ don't suffer. Mind you it's dual digic 6 vs digic 4 i think in 750d. It's the beast weather sealing, fps and 65 point focus that's the major draw for me. Specially as it opens up more creative compositions. I dont actually want a tilt screen out on a shoot for the purpose of this 7d mkii and I don't need wifi or anyyhing like that either. I shoot american bullies & the like so I need a camera that will take the odd knock and wet conditions. I had a play with the 7d mkii yday... that 10fps is insane! I shoot exclusively through VF with the dogs, how will the focus performance differ between the two? I use single point AF, AI servo burst rate
@@themarksmanABP In terms of support going forward, Canon have just discontinued the 7D Mark II so you'll be better off with the 750D for the time being.
@@jw_film it's ok, I received the camera friday lol... all good though, I had a nice price on an excellent condition, low shutter count. I have 2 bodies now. The camera is a beast & perfect for my needs.
Here's the problem I have with the 7D (mark ii). Personally, I own a 7D mark i for about 6 years now and what I hate the most about it is the sharpness of the photos it produces. It's just unable to produce that tack-sharpness a full frame camera can. The example photos in your video show that as well. Non of them are like "supersharp" There is some slight softness to them. They are definitely in focus, but I always feel I am missing some quality. First I thought the lens I was using just wasn't sharp enough. But even when I switched to some very good primes, it didn't produce the result I was looking for.
Really sorry to hear that you've got this problem with your 7D Mark II. I've always been impressed with the images I've got from mine both in the studio and out at events. I do feel like I will switch to full frame in the future.
Hey James, I need a camera for a music video shoot. It's my first project, so i need a body, a prime lens,(either wide or 50) and a gimbal in a pretty tight budget. the camera should be capable of at least 1080 60, should have good battery life, and good autofocus for video. The 7d mk 2 seems to do all this. I don't think i'd need more from a camera for my first project, let me know if you think there's something else that i should prioritize. As a side note, i enjoy bird photography, and was also considering the eos m50, it's working out a bit more expensive, with the mandatory extra battery and eos m to ef/ef-s adapter, and i really don't know if the smaller size and weight, (and sort of usable 4k), at the expense of environmental sealing and battery life is something to pay extra for. There's also the aspect of forming a good impression on the client. Please let me know if there's something else i should consider, or which one of these two i should go for. Thank you
The 7D Mark II will do well with the autofocus. Might be a bit heavy for a gimbal depending on the lens you get. If you enjoy bird photography, then its probably a safe bet to go with the 7D Mark II.
@@jw_film I would absolutely agree. I tried the Canon M6 MkII and sold it (at a loss) within a month, the 7d MkII for birds especially was much easier to deal with. I am interested in the new R series bodies though.
My big dilemma is wether to go for the 7dii or the 90d. I would get the 7d used so theres a fairly significant price saving but I'm not sure which to go for. I'd use it for literally everything from wildlife to landscapes. If it was dedicated wildlife I would go for the 7d because of the AF but since it's all round I really dont know :/
I think it all comes down to what you do. The only thing that puts me off the 90D is the single card slot, otherwise I think it looks like a solid APS-C DSLR. The lockdown scuppered my plans of comparing these two cameras side by side for a while but I'll try and get to it as soon as I can with some good real world examples. What features would you like the 7D 2 or 90D have that you are really looking for?
Thankyou for the reply! I am a hobbyist and sell photos now and again but rarely do client work unless it's for family, with that being said the cf card isnt a huge loss for me, it's more the autofocus system 45 cross type af vs the 65 in the 7dii since I do wildlife from time to time
The 7D MKII has a magnesium alloy body and the 90D is plastic. Hang a heavy lens on the 90D and you'll end its life. No brainer if you want a camera that is pro level.
There is already a good review of the two on RUclips. The only thing I find is that she 'knocks' the 7d MkII on battery life- I haven't had the issue she mentions UNLESS I leave the camera on in long periods between shooting. Oddly, it does drain the battery faster just sitting BUT if you're using the camera I'm getting far more than the 600-700 she mentions even with older batteries. ruclips.net/video/cqkymaBq-Oo/видео.html
I really hope someone answers me.. so i'm planning on buying the 7D Mark l, my budget can't go further for the Mark ll, i'm going to use it for cinematic vids 90% of the time, also i need to know can i get good quality at low light too, or i should rather the EOS M50 or 77D? I will really appreciate if someone answers me, because seriously i don't know what to do.
Hi Mikayel. Personally, if you can't go for the 7D Mark II due to budget then either look now at the 77D or the 80D. They both use a newer sensor than the 7D Mark II and perform slightly better in low light from what I have seen. I will be honest, that Canon APS-C cameras are not known for their low light abilities. With the 7D Mark II, in video, I take it to a maximum of 3200 and even then, the image is starting to fall apart. I don't know enough about the M50 to comment on it other than to say I don't think Canon are going to be continuing that line much more now they have brought out the new EOS R and the RF mount as from speaking to a Canon rep, the M50 didn't take off the way Canon wanted it to, hence the new EOS R. Let me know what you decide to go for. Have you thought about what lenses to get with a new camera?
@@jw_film I really appreciate it, so overall i think i'm going for the 77D, i just need to know can i get good image on low-light for car editing, the lens EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM.
@@kingmikayel If you've got the cash to spare I'd look into getting either the Canon 17-55mm f2.8 or the Sigma 17-50 f2.8. They are fixed aputure so the exposure won't change as you adjust the focal length and it'll let in 1-2 stops more light than the kit lens. I've got the Sigma 17-50mm myself and it's a solid lens for the price and I've always found it has good usability with the Dual Pixel Autofocus on My 7D Mark II. Plus the IS works well.
Hi quick question regarding your sigma 17-50 f2.8. does it rattle when you shake it lightly? i just received mine and it does. wanted to know if it was normal and is that because it's not weather sealed. thank you.
I have to say this is something I haven't noticed at all in the entire time that I've owned that lens but yes mine does rattle! I think it might be the image stabiliser rattling around as when its attached to the camera and the camera is on, the rattling isn't there.
Thanks so much, i thought i may have had a defected lens, i have noticed its quieter when its attached also. i notice all kinds of sounds, sorry if it will make you listen to that lens more now, but know you will not suffer alone. lol 😁
Hi Rah, I'm only really use my 7D Mark II now for two scenarios, one is for long exposure landscapes and the other is for studio work with products. When I have used the 7D Mark II in the studio, I have always been really impressed with the images and how much clarity there has been. Some of the portrait stills in this video are some that I use for portfolio work today. While an APS-C camera isn't normally chosen for portrait work, I think its still a great choice. I did a shoot a couple of weeks back with another photographer who had the 5D Mark IV and aside from actual file sizes, we were struggling to tell them apart when using the same lens.
I have sold my EOS 7D Mark I due to the fact that it can't produce the same image quality found in the EOS 5D Mark I. Is there any improvement in image quality on the EOS 7D Mark II when compared to the EOS 7D Mark I?
I would say there is a considerable improvement over the MK 1 but it's been a long time since I've used a MK 1. There is about a 2 stop ISO difference from memory
Technically, the difference is slightly less than a stop. www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-7D-Mark-II-versus-Canon-EOS-7D___977_619
Hey James, i noticed You're quite responsive in comments section. Could you help me out mate? I have two second hand options for same price, I can either get a second hand 200D mii with 1k stutter count or 7D mii with 50k shutter count and battery grip, both have 18-55mm lens included. My primary use is to click pictures & videos of Yoga workouts. Please suggest which option to go for? Also, if i buy another lens which one should it be for my purpose? Would really appreciate if you responded man. Love from India🇮🇳❣️
Hey there! I do try and keep on top of the comments :-) I think if it was me, I'd go for the 7D Mark II for the increased autofocus, image quality and dual card slots so I would have redundancy when shooting. Lens wise I've never gone wrong with my Tamron 24-70. You lose a bit on the wider end because it's meant for EF not EF-S but it's a fantastic workhorse lens. Before that I traded in the 18-55 and got a Sigma 17-50 f2.8 which while not as sharp as the 18-35mm, still did a very respectable job. Hope that helps with the decision :-)
I think if you're looking for a mix for filming and stills at the moment then either the Panasonic S1 or A7III for the best of both worlds is your best bet in June 2019. I'm still hanging onto my 7D Mark II for stills only but will be getting a GH5S for video
You want a upgrade for filmmaking and you are looking for other lenses....why....i would choose a cam with better specs..but...there are so many good lenses....personally i like the tamron G2 trinity....but if you want a light , good, and affordable wideangle aps-c lens....take a look at this one...tamron 10-24 f/ 3.5- 4.5 di II vc hld......
Compared to what the Sony A7III can do with an MC-11 adaptor, the 7dMkII and D500 are now very overpriced to compete. Still relevant? I want to say yes. I thought the 7D Mkii was a great wildlife/sports camera. A good allrounder for most daylight/cloudy situations. Perhaps one of the best for dynamic range balance (beautiful green colours for landscapes). Low light performance is debatable. I personally found the 80d much better in that area. But after switching the A7III its on a seriously different level. Would I have a 7dmkii as a backup? Yes but not for retail price only if it was second hand. As you've pointed out in your video the 7dmkii is a great portrait camera and found it the best to use for art like wildlife photos. Id be happy to use it for stationary subjects. But for tracking the A7III is unbeatable. I was losing to many shots to focus problems on the 7d mkii.
It's something that I would actually really like to test out is a comparison between the A7III and the 7D Mark II. I think a fair comparison would be to cap the A7 III in its crop mode and see how the images compare. Definitely going int the calendar to see if I can do it in early 2019. What lenses are you using with your A7III and MC-11 adapter?
@@jw_film I would definitely recommend it. I only use my old Canon fit Sigma 150-600 contemporary on it for wildlife (all I need) and a Sony 28-70mm kit lens which I intend to replace with a Canon 16-30 f4. A7III crops down to 10mp. Its a bit strange in that mode. I tried it briefly today. Not sure in terms of price it would be a fair test to compare in crop. Its a completely different beast to the 7dmkII.
@@Pan3optic3on Ah ok, I didn't know it cropped in that much on the sensor. It's still something I want to test out. I had a shoot last week where the b cam was a GH5S and the video quality from that was truly excellent. Definitely in two minds over the A7III and GH5S.
@@jw_film Its definitely worth a test. The A7IIIR will crop down to 18mp but the A7III to 10mp. Its not much of a big deal. I crop a lot of my bird shots down anyway so its kind of handy to have it there if I need it. Video AF on the A7III is a bit scary. AFing at 500-600mm. Couldnt get that kind of speed with the 7Dmkii or 80d. I dont shoot video normally but was hoping the A7 III could handle it. Im glad it can. Ive not used the GH5S so couldnt comment. As far as wildlife, landscapes and astro is concerned its hands down a truely awesome performer. A friend of mine still uses his 7d mkii alongside his A7 III. I dont blame him, there is just something about the look of the pictures that is truely beautiful especially for portraits and a variety of other subjects. The owl in my profile pic was take with the 7Dmkii, one of my favs. Will probably grab another secondhand one in future.
@@Pan3optic3on The owl is really stunning. You've definitely given me some food for thought with the A7III so I'm going to have to try and test it out.
A balanced series of comments. I am not that interested in video on my "stills" cameras one of which is the 7D MkII, when I want to do video, I have a couple of Panasonic camcorders which ergonomically are designed for the purpose. Not because I am a "Canon fanboy" but I do have a large degree of empathy with their apparent view that if you want to do video, move on to their C range or the equivalents from other brands. In fact I suspect that if video was my priority, I would probably buy the new Black Magic 'Pocket camera' ( some pocket !). I use mt 7D mainly for wildlife and probably a couple of airshows during the Summer, its auto focus and fps is still pretty awesome, a few months back I did a 42 frame RAW burst of a startled Heron taking off from a reed bed and every frame is in focus. Whilst I am sure that the Sony A series are wonderful cameras, the point is that I'm into taking pictures, not buying hardware and so long as my current kit is producing the results, I can see no reason to switch.
You are right John, as a stills camera the 7D Mark II is still fantastic and I find more and more reasons to use it everyday. Maybe less for video these days but I've recently started getting into long exposure photography and I've been blown away by the quality of them. A 42 frame RAW burst??!? I would love to see even one of those frames. Did you post them online? Glad you liked the video :-)
@@jw_film "My Heron" so far no simply because I haven't found a way to do so, 42 frames is too much as a sequence, way too boring for average viewers so I have been experimenting, montages, cutting out frames for a smaller sequence and so on, haven't yet found something I like that conveys the 'majesty' of it all. The trick to capturing that of course is the fastest CF/SD cards you can afford, I actually also have an M6 system I use as a travel/lightweight option and using Lexar 1000 cards rated at up to 150 MB/s. I've got 17 frame RAW bursts out of that before the buffer fills up however, it does raise an issue that brings a smile to my face when people bang on about how many 'frames per second'. When I heard that the Sony A9 could do 20 I just laughed because unless you are a photo journalist with your camera plugged into ethernet and a picture editor sorting out the shots for you, that would be my idea of Hell. At an airshow last Summer I photographed a truly skilled pilot flying a Pitts Special stuntplane sideways, just a few feet off the ground whilst trailing smoke. Later in Lightroom I thought, "Well out of these 35 images, which 34 am I going to delete ?" Point being, at least my Heron sequence is different frame to frame whereas as I was shooting the Pitts pretty much filling the frame, there was hardly any change shot to shot !
I do feel it should be relevant as it is only 5 years old. I use cameras that are well over 50 years old. Long before built in obsolescence was invented. I use modern cameras too but the thing is no camera gets worse than the day it was first marketed.
Jeremy Evans I couldn’t agree more, I can’t understand the logic that says that as soon as a new camera comes out all the images taken with a previous model are suddenly rubbish. I have several cameras older than my wife, and a couple of years ago she bought me a Zorki 4K and Jupiter 8 from the year she was born. For many reasons it’s my favourite camera, with my 5DII coming in second.
Hey there James, I bought my canon 7d mark II second hand, and the ISO speed I cannot change it to 125 or 160 only round numbers like 100, 200, 400 , 800 and so on. How can I change this in the settings menu? Great video btw!
@@diogosousa6 Some say that the intermediate settings do not give the same image quality as the 'round' numbers, although I cannot say I have found that. I often shoot at iso 640, especially if using the 7D2, where high iso quality is not as good as a full frame. If you want to change it back, go to the camera symbol which is over to the right of the menu (the last one before the star for my menu settings) and you will see iso increments, where you can set it back to third stops.
I have owned the 7D original and now the 7Dii as canon are not developing the 7Diii, nor do canon have decent alternative for the 7Dii. The AF system is amazing, dual card slots DP AF for video is great ( though touch screen would have been bloody useful ! ) solid build, witness ( optical ) flash control. Though I do fine the images touch some compared to sony NEX5R & A6500, and nikon D500. There is an aggressive AA filter which harms stills. Also I believe today's market want smaller, more portable cameras and lenses. As some venues will not allow 'professional cameras' which the 7Dii does look like. A sony A6500 and 18-55 or 55-210 do not look that professional. The EOS R IMO is too expensive for a cobbled together 5Div in a new body. Both IBIS is a real Beal breaker for me as cameras now are jack of all trades and specific to just one type of photography type, ie sports, landscape, portraits etc.
Todays market are being told by camera manufacturers that they want smaller, so they can sell new cameras. I have small hands and relatively long fingers, 7d Mk2 fits perfectly..... Still think if you are looking for bang for the buck the 7d mk2 is great for wildlife photography
For me undoubtedly it's the 70-200mm f2.8 IS II. It's razor sharp and accurate 99/100 shots. It's a full frame lens so you're using it to its full potential but I've never been disappointed with the lens and I use it every day. Before that I Used the Canon 24-105mm f4 and the difference was night and day. I am very tempted by the Sigma 85mm though. What are you currently leaning towards?
Its relevant as much as the photographer using it :) Thanks to marketing, we are always looking for the latest camera.. But, the quality of our photos? The subject, the story? Well yes, there is a leap in technology from my 70d, but i concentrate on the photos :) Nice video!!!
Nice man! I can agree with you on the review as well, since I too use a 7D Mark ii, but with a 24-70 f2.8 lens. Perfect for automotive photography. I post all of my edits on Instagram: lensaffect if you want to see. Same thoughts on the EOS R, that would be a good upgrade/ one to buy as they're coming out with a L series adapter for that camera which is life saving.
The EOS R is a step in the right direction but it's a very small step and sadly not right for me. Are you considering the R more for stills or for video?
I don’t need video anyway. For bird photography, especially when it comes to small birds and just range and speed count, nothing goes over the Canon 7D Mark II. I hope Canon really publishes in 2019 then Mark III.
I'm definitely waiting to see what Canon bring to the table in 2019. I don't think we can judge it all on the EOS R. It's main feature is the new lens mount and that has true potential
Thanks for all the feedback folks! The lenses I use to shoot stills and videos with this camera are:
Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC
Canon 70-200 f2.8 II IS
Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS
Canon 10-18 f4.5-5.6 IS STM
James I also shoot with the Tamron 24 -70 2.8 VC for wedding filming and I find it a great combination. The VC in that lens is incredible. I am able to go mostly handheld which I had never contemplated before. Think I might get the Atomos Ninja now to complete the set up. The clean HDMI out is so under utilised. I also have to add sharpnessi n post but I find the image quite Cinematic with the slight softness.
@@MrMcshaft It's a fantastic lens and I absolutely advocate the use of an Atomos Ninja Blade/2. It's not a night and day difference, but it does make cleaning up a noisy image easier, especially if you're using Red Giant Denoiser
What do you think about the Canon 17-55 pair up with the 7DII?
@@stevecoke34 I haven't actually shot anything with the Canon 17-55 as I've had the Sigma 17-50 since I got my 7D Mark II. I've got a friend who shoots both stills and video with the 17-55 and it's never off of the camera, it's their go-to lens
thank you for the effort and sharing. i'm surprised no sigma 18-55/1.8. thumbs up.
I have been using my 7d ii for 5 years and I am still loving it. I take pictures of hummingbird. The auto focus is great. This is the only camera that I feel no upgrade is needed.
I would agree except now with the new 'R' models out there, their autofocus systems are truly amazing.
I have been shooting with my 7D2 for years now and I love it! I don't do video at all so what the camera lacks in that venue doesn't bother me...
I'm using 7D mark 2 in 2021 for bird's photography landscape it is a good camera.
For those photography genres, the 7D Mark II was always fantastic for especially wildlife photography 🙂
I bought recently a secondhand 7d mkII for wildlife photography. The AF is brillant.
Yes I think you are absolutely correct when you said that you don’t need all that new stuff if your camera do the job why spending money I also have Canon 70d, Sony a7r, Sony a6000,and Nikon d7200 and I am totally happy with everything I have
I recently inherited this camera and really enjoy shooting with it. It has beautiful clarity for landscape photography.
It is a really fantastic camera for stills, it served me very well for years. Happy shooting with it 🙂
I just bought the 7d mark ii, 5 years later. I hope I like it
i want to buy it too,howdo u feel while using it to photograph peoples？
I have had my 7D mkii for three years as I have to say it’s an absolute workhorse! Portraits product landscapes weddings sports wildlife(not so much though!) time-lapse macro and long exposures, what ever I’ve thrown at it it’s done a fantastic job.
The menu for the focusing(sports/wildlife) is quite challenging t get your head around but once I got use to it my photos got pin sharp.
Will I ever part with it?....yes but only if the 7D mklll is mirrorless. If they bring out another mirrorless full frame with better specs than the 7D mkll then I’ll get that & keep my 7D2.
Thanks for the video James, even though it's taken me two years to see it. This week I got my first 7DMk2. It is a welcome addition to two classic (but very old) 7D cameras. The reason I got this one in 2020 is mostly as you explained in your video. For US$700, a Magnesium Alloy weather sealed Canon APSC with 20MPixels, 65 Focus Points in Dual Pixel, and both SD/CF card storage at 10fps, along with both Mic and Headphone jacks, is a great device for the price. As with everything else it is a tool for the job, so if your needs are 4k, this camera is worthless. But if you photograph on the go, and need something on a budget that will fit your existing lenses, this seemed to me like the obvious contender. Cheers.
I still use it with my 600 f4 is L for wildlife and bird photography. Flight focus tracking is great.
thanks for the intel on the 7D mark II i still use mine with sigma lense 18-35mm 1.8 and the cam performs still very huge , is one of my favorite DSLR'S
I too own the 7DM2, carry it around with its own proprietary battery grip and a substancial 70-200 F2.8 IS II, a Sigma 18-35 F1.8 and a 24-70 F2.8, you gotta admit tho, the fact that you can write to two cards and the ability to record clean HDMS 8 bit, does make this crop sensor flagship camera from Canon, a worthy rival to newer mirror less cameras though...I still love my 7DM2.
It’s a fine camera. I have one for 3 years and it has not let me down. The things for what I would upgrade mine is image quality, sharpness and more megapixels.
Now its 2021 and i still got my 7D mk2. I dont do any video though, but mostly nature photography, often with birds in some kind of action. I truly love that camera and i dont see any reason to change at the moment.
Thanks for posting James. I am a professional photojournalist. I also shoot everything from product photography to wildlife for various clients. The 7D MKII is my go-to camera. I have yet to find anything good enough to replace it. Except for the rumored to be coming soon 7D MKIII.
My pleasure Chad. It's such a versatile camera that its hard to knock it down apart from it's video features. I often consider jumping over to Sony for video but I can't justify it yet with the quality I get in stills from my 7D Mark II. I too am going to hold on for the 7D Mark III and see what it brings to the party as I was more than a little disappointed by the EOS R.
I have had this camera for a few years. I have kennel of hunting dogs and I'm always in the outdoors looking for action shot. I may have taken 25,000 photos and I love this camera. I have a canon 7--200 f4 and set the shutter at 1000, and everything works great. Very sharp photos. I edit in LR. The Camera is super tuff, I mean over the top. I had a dog once grab the strap and pull the camera off a table and drag it over rocks. I simply love this camera. 40 years now, and this is by far the best I've ever owned or used.
It is extremely tough and can pretty much deal with any situation that's thrown at it. Very impressive it survived being dragged off a table by the dog though!
I bought the 7d mark II in january 2015. I use it for travel, family, concerts and sports mainly with EF28-300mm L IS USM, Tamron 2.8/24-70VC and EF-S 10-18mm. Great! The only camera I'd like to have are the 5dIII or IV, especially for concerts. Remarkably the 7dII does no get cheaper, indeed the actual prize is about 100-150€ more than 2015.
I was very surprised that it's price point is holding but as Canon don't have anything else in that bracket. Yet!
Hi James thanks for making the informative video. Could I ask for you opinion please on a 7D mk2 verses the 6D mk2? I have the 7D mk1 and wish to upgrade. Firstly I am not interested in the video side of things. My bug bear with my 7D is the low light, I figure whatever I buy now will be a lot better. I have had my eye on the full frame 6D mk2 and read a lot of not great reviews, but they all seem to be comparing from a 5D mk4 perspective, and not from a crop to full frame perspective. Or after watching your video I go buy a 7D mk2 . I am aware of selling my EFS lenses if I go full frame. I mostly photograph weddings, bands and landscape. Thanks for your insight.
When the 6D Mark II was announced I too was a little disappointed - not by the specs, but after watching the camera stores review of it and seeing that dynamic range wasn't good at all, in fact I think it was a bit worse in some instances.
While it's probably about 1 stop better in low light (I'm going from my experience of owning an original 6D before I swapped to the 7D Mark II).
What you get from the 7D Mark II, much like the 7D is those great ergonomics. The dual card slots, the faster shutter and if you're already baked into EFS glass then jumping to full frame unless you're going switch glass will be pricey.
The 7D Mark II has limited availability since Canon are slowing down production so I imagine at MKIII version is on the way.
How soon do you want to make the change?
Personally for me, the single card slot is a bit of a deal breaker these days but when I had an original 6D, I never had a card fail on me.
Weddings and landscapes I'd probably say the 6D Mark II - if you have the cash for full frame lenses but just be very aware that it's only a single card slot.
In defence of the 7D Mark II, I comfortably use it up to ISO 3200 during event photography.
Hi James thanks for the reply. I would like to purchase before Christmas. I wish to sell my original 7D to fund the new camera. I only have the 10 - 22 EFs lens. The other lenses are EF. I may go for the 7D mk 2 because of your review. 👍.
@@bangtwister Well let me know how you get on and good luck 🙂
I own the 7D mk2 and the 6D mk2. I use the 7 for sports and most portraits, the 6 for video, landscape and some lowlight portraits.
Hi James, how do you consider the 90D vs 7D Mark II, from a wildlife photography standpoint?
Did i hear right, you shoot portraits at f8 ?
I did notice that subject's face details are all in focus in your sample shown in the video...
I am interested in this particularity, obvious benefits comes such as more details, more sharpness from using sweet spot of lenses
But challenges also, like background separation might be trickier, light amount required.
Thank you for the video, it was very interesting.
I shoot with 90D, I am still very fascinated to see the differences with this legendary pro apsc body ! If only Canon recycled the best of both 80D and 7D II !
Ah this is something that is subjective. When talking about shooting portraits in this video, I'm referring to controlled studio environments. Then shooting at F8 is preferred due to the power available from strobes.
In practice and in outdoor portraits, I'd say I used to aim more for F4 if I could because then I did get some background separation but for me, I like the subjects face to be in focus from the nose to the eyes to the ears - it's just a preference for me.
@@jw_film thank you for your reply. Your explanation is somewhat i expected... I am glad I learned new ways of taking pictures
Hi James, great vlog thanks. I think I am nr-ish you, was that Coate water? I got the 7d mk2 in the summer at the Swindon Outlet for a good price and love it, seeing this vid shows me that it was a good buy and can do so much more I have tried so far. I have not tried much video yet, but will. I love that it is an all rounder. Your comments about fast standard zooms was great, had been thinking of a wider zoom 10-22 maybe, time will tell. Will check out your other vlogs, once again thanks for your posts.
You are right Jeff that is indeed Coate Water. I haven't tried the 10-22mm, only the 10-18mm and I get really good results with it, very surprising results seeing as it's a relatively cheap wide angle lens. Let me know which one you go for and how you get on with it :-)
Excellent review. I shot with the original 7D for many years, skipped the 7DII, thinking that the III would be out soon, but that hasn't been the case. Got an 80D as an interim 2nd camera. Still waiting to see where everything settles in the camera world.
Its definitely all up in the air at the moment in terms of cameras Paula. The 80D is a good "little" camera, very nearly bought one myself at one point but then they announced the EOS R - I didn't get that either!
Thanks for watching :-)
hi.. very informative video.. thanks.. a quick question.. we have a black friday sale(nov 19) for the 7d mark 2 for £1000 (body only) is it priced reasonably?
I'd say so!
Funny how I came to this on RUclips
Good price I’d agree and I just found a body for $800.
I am trying to upgrade affordably from a Sony A57 from like 6 years ago ?
I was thinking about the M50 but then I started seeing these 7d Mark ii for 8-1000
What’s anybody think between the 2 ?
🧐
A very good overview of this long running camera. It's as tough as old boots, like Nikon's D3. But now is the time to only buy one secondhand, as it makes no sense to pay new retail price, compared to the price of much newer, better spec, mirrorless cameras like the G9, XT-3, or Canon's own Rp and R.
Great video mate, im coming off an canon t3i with an L series 24-105mm usm lens (i shoot mountain biking both video and stills). I was wondering if id be better off with the 90d at $2000 AUD or a used 7d mark ii at $1000 AUD and spending the difference on some audio or lens upgrades?
I'd probably go with the 90D now as the sensor, the chips and the tech are all much better than they were in 2014. I think the 24-105 is still a solid lens for that. It you've got some budget for audio, go invest!
@@jw_film Cheers man, ill definitely put some money aside for audio!
Hi James, how about the 7Dmk2 against the now released 90D, how does it stack up? i am still using the old 7D mk1 and i often wonder do i go and get a 90d or a 7Dmk2. i only shoot photos, i am not into video or blogging or anything like that, just action, animal and macro images - any suggestions on what to do? If only there was a 7Dmk3 on the horizon
Hi Erich, apologies for the late reply on this one!
I think the 90D has a lot of new features but the AF on the 7D Mark II still seems to best it, judging from the reviews from DP Review and The Camera Store TV. You'll also get the megapixel bump from the 90D.
I need to get one to do a test of it and see how it compares.
@@jw_film Is there weather sealing on the 90D?
@@doghouseriley4732 There is weather sealing on the 90D but it's not as good as the weather sealing on the 7D Mark II from my understanding.
Killer informative vids man, I subbed! 🙌 Close to your 1k!! Keep up the vids!!!🤘
Thank you! While I've not posted a new video for a little bit, I've got a couple of very in-depth camera videos coming up but they are not Canon cameras 😉.
Thanks for subbing!
@@jw_film Keep it up my dude!!🙌
Great review! - I shoot professionally with the Canon 7D mark II and love it!.. I had a 5D Mark III before and for some reason I prefer the 7D II!. Love the dual Digic 6 processors.. the colors... the speed and the focusing system, greatly!. The only reason I'd ever change would be to go to the 7D Mark III - Hopefully it will have an articulated screen (much better for Real Estate Photography in those tight corners.. will save my knees too being 6'6" lol) Have considered the Sony A7R III for the low noise and greater detail in large landscape images and for the sharp 4k video.. but out of my price range...
Like the Canon 24-105 F4L IS.. the Canon 7D Mark II is an awesome all-rounder!
It is a great all rounder! I've spent the last week or so working with a Sony A7RII and an A7S II and the handling on them is atrocious to me. As much as Canon might hold back on some features, their ergonomics are beyond reproach.
Have you had any experience with the Sigma 24-105mm on your 7D Mark II?
@@jw_film It really is!.. I have held a couple of Sony's and you're right.. they don't feel so much, a part of your hand as the 7D II does seem to feel.
I haven't personally used the sigma as yet... :) Used to have the Tamron 24-70 2.8 DI VC and did like it on the 7D II. My everyday is the trusty 24/105 F4L IS aforementioned in my first post. I also have the EFS 10-22mm for real estate and the EFS 60mm F2.8 Macro for detail shots, macro and some portrait work.
@@StachR34 I traded in my 24-105 for the Tamron and 4 years on its still great. The VC makes it brilliant for video.
I'm not sure there will be another camera like the 7D Mark II again!
@@jw_film Agree with you on the above! :)
I do wish the 24-105 was a little sharper at F4!
I sold my 24/70 Tamron (Not that I wanted to) with the rest of my gear 3 years ago, just before I got the 7D II and 10-22mm.
All i need is the articulated screen and I'd be a happy camper for a long time! :)
I own the 7d mark 2 and just love it.. the video didn't mention how built like tank this camera can be taken to war zone. The images u get from Canon lens are superb. I only get cannon L lens b cause I like the stablization for fast shooting without tripod. The Canon lens are also very tough and weather sealed. Take this beast in any weather . I would only upgrade with another camera with faster shutter speed. 10 fps ! It's 2 card slot built in time laspe . Only thing I upgrade if they come out with faster than 60fps video and still have the specs of more than 7 mark 2 ... This camera 20 Meg is more than you need. Reason why 7 mark 2 owners have nothing but great things to say about this camera . I will be long time before I upgrade .
It is indeed built like a tank! The only reason I am considering switching mine as a b camera for video is that it's video is quite soft.
As a stills camera, I am going to be using this for the foreseeable future because it is just fantastic!
The EOS 7D is an outdoor DSLR. It is rugged and pretty much bullet proof. I have dropped my 7D 3 different times due to the strap that comes with it, simply does not work well. The camera received only a scratch where the strap loop is. By the way each time it fell to the sidewalk. I have since remedied the problem, due to the fact my passion is landscape photography, usually shooting in storms and rivers. The camera's ruggedness goes beyond any other camera on the market. This is why the 7D is still a very popular camera I believe. I love to walk into a camera shop and find them in used condition, because I can pick them up for very little. I don't use it for video so I don't care about it's lack of features in that respect. Keep shooting, and remember, "Don't fix what still works."
You are absolutely right Gary, it's handling and ruggedness really is second to none!
Great vid James, so I've still been using my 7D Mark I for smaller jobs and borrowing my buddies 5D Mark IV for bigger shoot's whenever he isn't using it, but need I to upgrade on my own badly , is it wise to buy a 7D Mark II now, hold off for a Mark III or buy the 80D? What do ya think? I foolishly bought a Canon M6 for a trip and hate it, wish I would have gone with the M5 instead, oh well .
Hmm, a tricky one. I'd be tempted if I was in your position to look at the EOS R, especially if you're doing more video. The video is much sharper than what you get on the 80D and with its crop in 4K, it feels like an 80D. In stills though, it's essentially a 5DMKIV so you'll know what you're getting from it. I can't think it will be long before a 90D comes round the corner.
Do you shoot more stills or more video?
@@jw_film Stills, and I actually borrow my buddies 5DMKIII, anyway thanks for your input I appreciate it, but am staying away from the EOS R until later versions...
@@spoilst Completely understandable and I am as well. The EOS R is a little way away from being ideal for a lot of situations. The 80D is great choice if you're just doing stills and don't mind losing the joystick.
I own a 7D2 long time ago and recently I purchased EOS R. I think EOS R is a good complementary to 7D2 but cannot replace 7D2. The EVF is great, and R have a higher resolution and definitely have a better image quality than 7D2. And R is the first canon's full-frame camera that could use EF-S lenses, so the EF-S lenses that used on my 7D2 could be used on R with an adapter, which is one of the main reason I chose R. But R has much lower (5/s vs 10/s) rate in continuous shooting mode (with servo focus), and I think the continuous auto focus in photo and video is worse than 7D2. And R just cannot record 1080p60 video on a EF-S lens, but 7D2 can.
R: Good for landscape and portrait. And the RF lens is great, but can only be used on R currently. Have the ability to record 4K video, and with a EF-S lens, the crop in 4K doesn't really matter. Low light is better than 7D2 since it is a full-frame. Better than 5D4 but cheaper.
7D2: Good for sports (and much better than R). And the video is enough in most cases.
The video in both of these two camera is a bit soft (when using +0 sharpness), but you can add sharpness by using some software or change the color profile settings.
And I think I won't need a 7D3 because 7D2 is enough. 7D to 7D2 is a big update (and 7D is my first DSLR), but I don't think 7D3 will have big updates. And when it comes to ISO performance, full-frame is definitely better than APS-C.
One of the things I didn't get to test on the R was the slow motion. If I was looking for a purely stills camera and I was coming up from the lower APS-C line-up then the R absolutely makes sense but ergonomically it kept fighting me. I'd happily give up the swipe bar for a joystick!
I sadly shoot far more video than stills so the R is going to be a miss for me this time around.
When did you get your R?
James Watts I got the R about a month ago, with RF 24-70 L and RF 35mm (the only 2 RF lenses that have IS), and with a free adapter.
To me it still is, Its one of my main cameras I use mine mainly for motorsports, events and sometimes portraits in fact I use it for just about everything and it can do time-lapse and other things too I love mine. I also own a SL2 aka 200D for those times I want to use a smaller camera, most time I use it to shoot video,
I've started using mine much more for timelapses and long exposure photography and it produces some really beautiful images.
Hi James, is the 7D Mk2 still relevant in 2020 ? will we ever see a Mk3 version or is this the end of the flagship for APSC?
Hi Erich. In terms of video, yes the 7D Mark II is well past its prime now.
In terms of stills, I still think the 7D Mark II has a place. Certainly as a wildlife camera, it pretty much has no match in terms of other canon DSLR's. It AF system is still vastly surperior to the new 90D from my understanding of how the AF points are laid out. Also, other than the 1DX III and 5D IV, there aren't any other cameras in their stills line-up with dual card slots (which I feel is mandatory, especially for my own work).
In terms of a 7D MK III, I wish there would be but i think the 7D MK II might be the end of the line for this series.
I use mine, along with my 5DIII, all the time and I’ve no intention of upgrading either until they can no longer function. I don't shoot video and it has no interest to me, mainly because I have a permanent respiratory condition and no one wants to hear my strider. I also drop digital cameras quite frequently so I need something tough. My 7DII tumbled about 12 feet down a rocky embankment into the edge of Buttermere, where it stayed for about 5 minutes until I could get there. (I never sell kit because of its treatment) The 10fps has enabled me to get some great shots such as an Osprey just catching a trout on Loch Lowes. Because I never shoot wildlife with any of my analogue cameras I think it’s safe to say that after my retired 5DII (over 200k clicks and still hell of a camera) my 7DIII is my most used digital camera.
If there is one thing about the 7D Mark II, it's that its built like a tank!
James Watts I’m not anti progress such as mirrorless etc, and I certainly recommend them wanting their first decent system. But it’s the build of the titanium bodies and weather proofing that will keep me with the dslr cameras for now. The weight also makes things easier for me because with the battery grip it balances my large lens, though I fit it to my gimbal head on my knee and push it upright with my mobility scooter. I’ve subscribed by the way.
I am still happy with my 7D Mark II. I use a Canon 100-400mm Mk 2 lens which I find is a great combo.
Such a good lens. I borrowed one off a tog I was working with at an event not that long ago and it's fantastic.
So now in 2019 what are your thoughts? I'm looking to upgrade from a t5i for more professional shoots like music videos and shorts. Is a 7D mark ii still worth it or should I go for the EOS R? Really great video!
If its video that you are going for and want to stay with Canon, the EOS R is a much better bet than the 7D Mark II (which has sadly been discontinued by Canon as of May 2019).
I enjoyed my time with the EOS R. For me it wasn't what I needed at all so for video I've gone for the GH5S as it ticked all the boxes, especially when compared with a speedbooster.
The EOS R does have the variable ND adapter which is enviable.
What kind of music videos are you looking to make/currently make?
@@jw_film thanks for the advice I'll keep that in mind. What was it about the EOS R that didn't quite do it for that the GH5S does? With the additional costs of the mirror less I'm trying to weigh the pros and cons and get all the information I can get. I've done hip hop and folk, as well as doing live bands, and weddings
@@althentik For me it was range of codecs available, 10 Bit 422 colour in both 4K and 1080P and the overall practicality over other mirrorless options. I can add XLR's using the adapter, dual card slots and a proper waveform. As a video camera, it makes a lot of sense but it's not a great stills camera - for stills I'm still using my 7D Mark II but I find I'm rarely shooting with that outside of a studio or without strobes now.
@@jw_film that does give me a lot to think about. Thanks for all your help.
Unfortunately my 6D recently broke, so I’m selling my 1D Mark IV to get this. I’m not a professional so would this be good as an only body? Thanks
would you still recommend it in 2019? I want to buy a camera kit for < $2000, Mirrorless or DSLR doesn't matter, but I want a camera that shoots excellent stills for that price.
Great review I'm have the canon 7d. Agree about the recording
I love my 7d2 however i switched to sony (a7m3) i still keep my 7d2 for wilflife i love it iwth my Tammy 70-200 VC (gen1) and my Canon 400mm f5.6 L and 300 f4 L IS. But.. if there are affordable lenses for sony like a 400 f5.6 or better a 500 f5.6 i am leaving my 7d2 but for now ..
Sony are definitely improving their lens line-up all the time and it's not going to be long before Canon aren't ahead in that market, but instead competing. Their new RF range of lenses are fantastically sharp, Its just a shame that the EOS R is a bit of a half-baked camera
I just went back to my Canon 7D because I like the built quality and the 18 megapixels is more then enough for professional prints. Rather then worry about new technology I'd rather put on good glass and focus on working on my skills. I also have the 7DMII which is like new.
Build quality on the mk ii is the same!
As an original 7D user this title triggered me :’)
On a note of relevance to today: other than having survived every possible scenario (from glaciers to tropic weather), as long as you know how to work with light and got good glass: why upgrade if Canon doesn’t produce interesting cameras anyway?
I think Canon do produce interesting cameras, Its just that they are usually handicapped in one way other another.
The 7D Mark II to me feels like a camera they purposefully didn't handicap, especially at its time of release.
James Watts that’s a fair point. I remember buying it then because it seemed like such a step-up from my 500D. I have just grown disillusioned by recent releases when compared to Sony specifically, but right now even Nikon.
@@UNLouise I'm with you there. The EOS R was a big flop to me and I've been working with more and more event photographers who are making the switch from Canon to Sony
Hi, After searching to upgrade I have narrowed my search down to the 4d mark II. Its the frame rate and the focus system that has it for me. How do the canon L series lenses perform on this body. Many thanks and great video.
I have the Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L lens and it performs brilliantly. All of the portraits in the video are taken with that lens and the results are stunningly sharp and the autofocus performance is second to none.
@@jw_film brilliant, many thanks appreciated. I really have narrowed it down to this body. After a lot of body comparisons this is what I will go for.
I've had my 7D Mark II for almost 3 years, mainly for wildlife. I was always very happy with it, especially that burst rate (which is surprising quiet).
Last March I bought a 5D Mark IV for landscapes. The image quality and dynamic range of that FF is miles better. I recently shot wildlife with it. Its burst isn't as fast as the 7DM2 and the mirror flip sounds like ... well, a cannon. So it's not ideal for wildlife. But the image quality has spoiled me.
So. I'm looking to upgrade the 7DM2 but not with another 5D. The R needs faster burst and full Servo capacity. If the next R ups those specs, or the 7DM3 spec rumors are close to true, that's when I'll move on from my trusty 7DM2.
I won't lie, I've been sorely tempted by the 5D Mark IV a number of times. If I was just using a camera for stills, then I would drop the cash for it.
Of course we can all hope the 7D Mark III is on its way in 2019
@@jw_film I have both and shoot mostly wildlife. Since getting the 5D4, I now use that most of the time, as the image quality and low light performance is far better. I can also crop more, which is often necessary with wildlife, even with 500 + 1.4 extender. The autofocus is the same as the 1DX mk 2 and I like the new lever on the back that changes the focusing zones, making it much easier to use there too.
I still have and use my 7D and have a new 7DM2. For shooting in well lite and studio my 7D works fine.
I've still got the 7D Mark II and its found a new lease of life as a top down camera for product photography.
Hello, I want to get into photography particularly fashion photoshoots. Between the Canon 7D mark ii, Canon 77D and the recent Canon 800D, which one would you recommend I go for?
Today I'd probably go with either the 7D MARK II or the 77D. If you are using strobes, then the 7D Mark II makes more sense as I think it has a higher sync speed. You'll also have more control over autofocus but you won't have the flip out screen.
Thabang Oupa Maila I have the 7DII which I use for wildlife that I love, but if I was buying a camera for fashion today I’d go 80D. It’s a better newer sensor and about £200 cheaper.
Great video and a good summary. I'm looking to get back into my photography and have the opportunity now to get a new body. I take my pictures of wildlife, pets and often landscapes but also will be getting into more portraits with my family. When I think about photo's I've mostly missed sharpness on when I've been back on the PC it's been the wildlife and scenery when on coastal routes around Wales or on safari. I've been investigating online and bounced from 7D mark ii, 6D mark ii, 80D, always seem to circle back to the 7D mark ii. Head-scratching times!
It's always a massive head scratcher! I think the body will depend on what lenses you have (or are planning to get). Are you looking at EF or EF-S lenses?
@@jw_film I currently have the following EF lens: 70-200 L USM, 70-300 Sigma APO DG and a 50mm prime that's now past its best alongside a Tamron 17-35. I loved my old 28-105 but that, like a lot of my old kit, has pretty much had it now. Since most of these were budget buys I'd be looking at upgrading these as I can. I've no issue really going EF or EF-S.
Thinking now of the 80D and saving the difference to add a new lens to my ageing supply.
@@adambroadhead I think that's a solid plan Adam. Which lenses do you currently have your eye on?
@@jw_film I need to do some exploration but definitely looking at getting a good lens for portraits and a good workhorse lens. My 50mm prime 1.8 was struggling to focus last few uses and my 28-105 has some dust in the glass. I'm always open to recommendations :)
I have the canon 7d mark II and I have used it with the atomos ninja II, but I have not managed to see any difference, only bigger files, then I tried to apply the grading and it was practically the same. I think I'm doing something wrong.
I don't think you're doing anything wrong. You're not going to see a world of difference between the internal 8 bit 4:2:0 codec and the Ninja's 8 bit 4:2:2 - it certainly isn't night and day (and that was something I found disappointing at first).
The difference that I saw is how noise is processed in the clips, as the Ninja's ProRes are a lot less compressed. I find it allows me to do a much easier noise clean up at higher ISO's and retain more sharpness and colour informaiton.
What was the situation you were using the Ninja in?
Hi. Im using the 7d atm, for bird and sport mostly. I loose allot of shots brcause i miss the focus on birds in flight. Will the image quality be allot better on the 7Dii as well as the tracking, or will it be more the same ?
The Mark II introduced the dual pixel af which is still fantastic. I can't say I've tried to shoot with birds in flight but I did a show jumping competition about a month or so ago and 90% of shots are tack sharp using a 70-200mm.
Compare the 7d 2 to the 90D....
I have two cameras that I like and will have forever, Canon 7D Mark II and Yashica 124G ...
I want to get the 90d but it’s so expensive where I live about 1500 dollars I currently use a canon t2i
The T2I was a great starting camera for me, it enabled me to build upon my skills and prepared me to step up.
What are you shooting with your t2i at the moment that makes you feel like you need to step up to the 90d?
James Watts I shoot mainly stills with a bit of video on the side, the video on the t2i is not great along with the photo resolution at only 18 mp so I can’t crop in. The iso on the t2i is unusable I can’t go more than 800
Should i buy this used as I just wanted to upgrade from my 1300d!? Getting this for 700 excellent condition!!!
I photograph rock concerts, sports, landscape and travel. Last year I upgraded from the 7dII APS-C to the 5dIII full frame. But I am a little bit disappointed with the 5dIII because the 7dII is too good. Only at ISO 6400 and 12800 the 5dIII has significant advantages. The AF fields of the 7dII are better distributed to the edges and it is a kalashnikow at 10fps. Love both and don't know why I should switch to Sony oder a Canon R.
I was of the same opinion. You're not going to get better AF performance from the EOS R although it does have more AF points, it's nothing like the 10FPS on the 7D Mark II.
I still have my 7D Mark II and it's still my go-to stills camera.
Have you looked at whether the 5D MKIV might be a better fit than the MKIII?
@@jw_film Of course I'd like to own the 5dIV. But it is still too expensive just for hobby. I found a used 5dIII in 2019 at a reasonable price (800€). Now I'll spend my money on good lenses.
EDIT: bought a Tamron 150-600mm G2 for wildlife. And I love the 7d mkII more then ever. Good to have a crop factor for far distances and small birds. Now I'm dreaming of a R5. This one could realy replace the 7d mkII and my 5d mkIII
Am very interested in this Canon 7D MKII. Trying to upgrade from an older Nikon D90. Does Canon offer courses in the U.S. West Coast which new owners can take to learn how to use this camera and get the most from it? Will the hot shoe allow me to connect to Novatron Strobe lights?
Hi Norman, I'm pretty sure there are courses in your local area (I'm in the UK so any course I reccomended wouldn't be easy to get to for you I fear! On the second count, again I don't know as I haven't used that particular strobe myself but I'll do some digging and try to find out for you.
Might be worth holding on for the 7D mkIII which is due next year. Even if you still plan on a 7D mkII the new release will mean a massive drop in price for the older model.
What are your thoughts on the 5d mkiv and a replacement or an addition to your 7D mk2, I also own a 7D mk2 and struggling to come to a conclusion, yes I like the look and how the Sony A7iii is working especially in low light, but I know while I use canon glass, there are compromises to be made, and while I do take low light party shots we are looking to do more wedding photo shoots, with the odd video, your thoughts please
The 5D MKIV I think is a good upgrade to the 7D Mark II but I wouldn't say it's a substantial upgrade. I've spent the week with a guy shooting on MKIV's and he would go up to 6400 ISO and no further as he knew he wouldn't be able to recover the images. The AF though is still fantastic.
Sadly I think there Will Always be a compromise and I weigh the options up myself about what to switch to.
The answer is; it depends upon what features are important to you. Watch the reviews on the 5D Mk IV and ask questions in the DP Review forum.
I am absolutely in love with this camera. I bought it about a year ago while i was waiting anxiously for the 7D MK3 to be announced. I am so glad i got it because the MK3 is still yet to be announced and it doesn't even have a release date in view. The only issue i have with it is a hard time with the white balance. Usually i go to Kelvin and adjust the number according to the light. In a yellowish light AWB is terrible.
Glad you are having a good time with the 7D Mark II! I haven't actually experienced that problem when I do auto white balance but I'm normally at a fixed WB for shooting.
When does it go yellow most often?
@@jw_film you know those street lights that have yellow light? I shoot on weddings and in the evening when im out of the hall that light is killing my shots. Took me a long time to figure out the right Kelvin numbers but i manage pretty good now. I also shoot some lightning shots. That too, i need to adjust the WB to K because on auto it is horible.
Here is my profile from gurushots. Check it out...
gurushots.com/predatoo/photos
@@666vraptor Shoot RAW and don't worry about it.
hi, good day, i need help please, i sometimes take my 7d markii to do video clis of 5 to 15 minutes but it cannot fit on facebook, what can i do, greate video
The background music reminded me of a perfect circle's song Judith :)
heyy james!
just wondering. does the 7d mark ii allows you to record VIDEO simultaneously to both cards?
i know that it can record simultaneously for photo, but does it allow you to record video to both cards at the same time (as in backup option)?
thanks!
Hi Imran, unfortunately video is only recorded to one of the cards not both. If you want a back-up, what ive always done is plugged in an Atomos recorder which gives me that safer back-up.
Heyy thanks man.
I assume that with an external recorder like the atomos, the camera can record simultaneously to one of the internal memory card slot and to the atomos as well?
Thanks again for the info James!
@@ImranTalib It can indeed record to one of cards at the same time as an external recorder. It doesn't matter which card slot either although I've found ive not been able to select which one.
I am new to photography and bought myself an EOS 1100D but as a beginner I still feel like an upgrade, I like wildlife photography and find 3fps to slow, I have seen a second hand 7D for sale
which I think would be better, any thoughts as money is tight.
I'd say if you can afford to get the 7D Mark II, you'll see a considerable upgrade in AF performance. While the 1100D is an entry level camera, it's still very powerful. I started with a 600D and learning that camera first and what it could do taught me that the lenses I had were what I needed to upgrade first. What lenses are you currently using with your 1100D?
@@jw_film Thanks for that, very helpful.
@@jw_film I am using a 18-55mm and a 55-250mm
1.3K subscribers and 1.3K thumb-ups. Every single one of your subscribers liked your video, a WORLD RECORD!
Being relevant in 2018 is a matter of perspective. The acceptance of the many shortcomings meant that the bar was set very low in order to remain relevant. This video is presented as a feel good about a product which is long in the tooth. It was nicely produced but does little to convince me that Canon wishes to retain their user base by failing to update this model.
Hello James, my wife does newborn photography and maternity. Mainly in the studio and outside on the beach and in the forest. Yesterday our 70d broke we bought 3 years ago and we need a new camera. The shutter broke and we have no time to fix it. Which camera would you advise? Our stuff is all canon. We don't do any video. Can't spend to much so I was thinking either 80d or 7d mark 2 or 6d mark 2. I know very little about cameras.
Hi Marcus, really sorry to hear that! It's always a pain when something breaks and it's always at the worst possible moment.
For familiarity and to get you back on your feet again, I think the 80D is going to be the safest option. Unless you have a lot of full frame lenses then the 6D Mark II might benefit you more but in terms of handling they are both almost identical.
Personally I'd go for the 80D if I was in your shoes.
Hi, I have upgraded from my eos 7d original to 7Dii. Mainly for the increase in AF points and better iso performance. I did use my 7D a lot for video until I got a NEX5R, what great little camera.
My question is the dual pixel accurate and fast enough to film at an airshow or motor sport event ! ?
I would say absolutely if you're using either L lenses or STM lenses
Tyson, I worked at a recent Air Show and looking at the magazine guys and the guys shooting for websites many of them were using the 7DMkii and I have use mine many times to shoot motorsports events truthfully any camera with fast autofocus and a high frame rate will do that I used to have a Sony a6000 and even with the 16-50 kit lens on it shooting action was no problem.
The 7Dmkii is actually made for sports, did you know it has an anti-flicker function to handle stadium lights? also just my opinion get memory card with a high MB/s rates I use SanDisk Extreme Pro SD card and UDMA CF cards I put the camera on high continuous shutter and AF servo and just track an airplane doing it loops and turns no problem the camera just goes on working.
@@bikecommuter24
Hi Donald
Thanks for the info.
I am aware of anti flicker option on the 7Dii.
I do use extreme pro CF & SD cards. I have set C1 dial to video settings, 1/50, AF Servo, ISO 100, standard Pic Style.
I take a Rode Mic with me as well and the audio is pretty good.
Now I have the 7Dii I do not have to worry about setting focus or having high f stop to allow movement with a depth of field zone. I have a zoom ring lever clamped on the Tele zoom 70-300 L lens so I can move focal length smoothly. I do enjoy using the 7Dii on shoots.
@@tysonator5433 No need to worry that is this camera's best feature AF is among the best, I usually just set my camera to AF Servo and I 'm good. f stops I'm usually f8 or so just depends sometimes I may add a ND filter you know bright noon light, white ramps planes flying into the sun not ideal lighting conditions for taking photos, I usually take a few test shots before just to make sure. And sometimes I may even put my camera on Auto I know blasphemy from the manual crowd lol. I also set my camera to Case 1 (Menu, AF screen 1) I may try some of the other just to see.
I been shooting for a few years and I'm always learning new stuff all the time what works today might be totally different tomorrow.
hopes this helps.
I still use it for professional pictures of soccer games
I wish Canon would fix the Exposure meter issue. I rely on it. In EOS 7D MII they messed it up!!
Undeniably the worst thing about the 7D Mark II is the exposure meter. Why be fine in aputure priority mode but then be this squished small bar on the right hand side for no reason at all. Drives me nuts!
Hey James I am wondering if you could help me out. I want a good mix of both video and image quality. I have a few options presented to me and would like to know which would be the best option for price and quality.
First option is a 1d mIV with a EF 17-40mm F/4L with hood and two lenses an additional battery and a charger for $850.
The next option is a 80d with a 18-135 mm lens for $680
both are in great condition please let me know thanks!
Personally if it was me, I would go for the 80D and the 18-135 option because you'll get a greater range of shots with that less (yes its not an L lens but its a great starting point) and with the 80D you'll get the newer Dual Pixel Auto Focus.
What would you be getting the camera to shoot primarily? Wildlife/Landscapes/Portraits?
James Watts awesome thank you! I want to shoot portraits and landscape mainly just get some shots while I’m traveling and surfing!
@@carterbuchman8955 You wouldn't want to travel much with such a heavy body as any of the 1d bodies, plus their extra batteries!
I've watch some of your video, No idea why you still have 211 subs and under 1k views per video. You should have at least 20-30k subs. RUclips algorithms sucks.
It's an algorithm I am still learning how to use. Sadly there isn't an instruction manual.
Thanks for saying so mate, it makes the hard work worth it :-)
I don't think 90D or 80D is replaced for 7d mark ii. What is negative feedback for 7d mark ii?. Shall I buy now for 7d mark ii. It's good choice still in 2020? For wildlife.
I still think the 7D Mark II is a great choice for wildlife. Great AF performance and coverage, dual card slots and the image quality is still great for stills (for video its lacking now). Its weakest point is ISO performance but anything under 3200 ISO still looks great!
@@jw_film Great thanks
I have shot at 6400 ISO with my 7D mkii for low light Event photography. With the new upgrade to Lightroom and posting images online, this has not been an issue. Even in print they are not bad considering low light has historically always had noise and has been improving, but yet is still very acceptable. Learning to use WB adjustment modes in low light really propels the limits of the camera.
For stills I do go to 6400 from time to time when it's online delivery but 3200 is about as high as I would want to go for print.
What type of events do you use your 7D Mark II for?
@@jw_film Personal Growth, Small Biz Dev, Entrepreneur. Many times in low light situations, which has me looking at Full frame cameras as well as for astro and landscape that I would like to do. However I shoot portraits, events and products all on my 7D mkii. I forgot to mention I am rarely below 1/125, try to get to 1/160 with nothing more than F/4 all without Flash. If I need to do a group shot then I get to up to 7.1 with a flash and a wide angle.
Is it relevant? Absolutely...I use it to take wildlife photos all the time. It's still a great choice for wildlife photographers using the canon system if you can't afford the Canon 1dx mark ii. A better question is should you still buy it in Dec 2018? The answer there is probably...Not if you can wait a little longer for the successor or alternatively you can get it at a really discounted price today and don't mind using older tech.
How much longer do you think it will be before the 7d mark iii comes out? Im wondering if i should pick up a used 7d Mk ii, and then just upgrade it when the new one comes out.
I would guess the 7d mark III or whatever canon chooses to call their new crop sensor sports / wildlife shooter is likely to come out in late 2019. I have a feeling it's going to be a mirror-less system. For that reason I would not buy a 7d mark ii this year unless you get it for 50 - 60% discounted price. It simply isn't worth investing in DSLR tech that is already more than 4 years old at this point. There is also a good chance that in a year or two the 7d mark ii will be discontinued. I would continue to rent if you are looking to use the system on a part time basis and then invest when the new models arrive late 2019 before the 2020 Olympic games.
Hey! Cool overview! Just subbed and I have a question...
I have started doing dog photography with my canon 750D. Would the 7d mkii have better IQ performance than my current camera? I understand the other advantages such as build quality, great 10fps vs 5, auto focus points etc...
From a specific IQ perspective though, how do they fare? I mainly use the new sigma sport 70-200 f2.8 as my main lens due to working distance and speed. When you say once the focus is locked on it's awesome, would it be better than the 750d I use?
Thanks
I think image quality wise they are pretty equally matched. It's the same sensor but like you say it's the autofocus and fps that separates them. Are you having any problems using the 750D or are you happy with the stills you're getting?
@@jw_film nah I'm well happy with the stills quality. Just with it being 24mp vs 20mp just wanted to make sure the IQ don't suffer. Mind you it's dual digic 6 vs digic 4 i think in 750d.
It's the beast weather sealing, fps and 65 point focus that's the major draw for me. Specially as it opens up more creative compositions. I dont actually want a tilt screen out on a shoot for the purpose of this 7d mkii and I don't need wifi or anyyhing like that either. I shoot american bullies & the like so I need a camera that will take the odd knock and wet conditions. I had a play with the 7d mkii yday... that 10fps is insane!
I shoot exclusively through VF with the dogs, how will the focus performance differ between the two? I use single point AF, AI servo burst rate
@@themarksmanABP In terms of support going forward, Canon have just discontinued the 7D Mark II so you'll be better off with the 750D for the time being.
@@jw_film it's ok, I received the camera friday lol... all good though, I had a nice price on an excellent condition, low shutter count. I have 2 bodies now. The camera is a beast & perfect for my needs.
@@themarksmanABP Oh fair play! I used mine on a property shoot last week and it's fantastic. Love bracketing with it
Here's the problem I have with the 7D (mark ii). Personally, I own a 7D mark i for about 6 years now and what I hate the most about it is the sharpness of the photos it produces. It's just unable to produce that tack-sharpness a full frame camera can. The example photos in your video show that as well. Non of them are like "supersharp" There is some slight softness to them. They are definitely in focus, but I always feel I am missing some quality. First I thought the lens I was using just wasn't sharp enough. But even when I switched to some very good primes, it didn't produce the result I was looking for.
Really sorry to hear that you've got this problem with your 7D Mark II. I've always been impressed with the images I've got from mine both in the studio and out at events. I do feel like I will switch to full frame in the future.
Where did you get your t-shirt? I want one.
Hey James,
I need a camera for a music video shoot. It's my first project, so i need a body, a prime lens,(either wide or 50) and a gimbal in a pretty tight budget.
the camera should be capable of at least 1080 60, should have good battery life, and good autofocus for video. The 7d mk 2 seems to do all this. I don't think i'd need more from a camera for my first project, let me know if you think there's something else that i should prioritize. As a side note, i enjoy bird photography, and was also considering the eos m50, it's working out a bit more expensive, with the mandatory extra battery and eos m to ef/ef-s adapter, and i really don't know if the smaller size and weight, (and sort of usable 4k), at the expense of environmental sealing and battery life is something to pay extra for. There's also the aspect of forming a good impression on the client. Please let me know if there's something else i should consider, or which one of these two i should go for. Thank you
The 7D Mark II will do well with the autofocus. Might be a bit heavy for a gimbal depending on the lens you get. If you enjoy bird photography, then its probably a safe bet to go with the 7D Mark II.
@@jw_film I would absolutely agree. I tried the Canon M6 MkII and sold it (at a loss) within a month, the 7d MkII for birds especially was much easier to deal with. I am interested in the new R series bodies though.
My big dilemma is wether to go for the 7dii or the 90d. I would get the 7d used so theres a fairly significant price saving but I'm not sure which to go for. I'd use it for literally everything from wildlife to landscapes. If it was dedicated wildlife I would go for the 7d because of the AF but since it's all round I really dont know :/
I think it all comes down to what you do. The only thing that puts me off the 90D is the single card slot, otherwise I think it looks like a solid APS-C DSLR.
The lockdown scuppered my plans of comparing these two cameras side by side for a while but I'll try and get to it as soon as I can with some good real world examples.
What features would you like the 7D 2 or 90D have that you are really looking for?
Thankyou for the reply! I am a hobbyist and sell photos now and again but rarely do client work unless it's for family, with that being said the cf card isnt a huge loss for me, it's more the autofocus system 45 cross type af vs the 65 in the 7dii since I do wildlife from time to time
@Code Bunny not to mention a better resolution and the touch screen plus low light is better on the 90d
The 7D MKII has a magnesium alloy body and the 90D is plastic. Hang a heavy lens on the 90D and you'll end its life. No brainer if you want a camera that is pro level.
There is already a good review of the two on RUclips. The only thing I find is that she 'knocks' the 7d MkII on battery life- I haven't had the issue she mentions UNLESS I leave the camera on in long periods between shooting. Oddly, it does drain the battery faster just sitting BUT if you're using the camera I'm getting far more than the 600-700 she mentions even with older batteries. ruclips.net/video/cqkymaBq-Oo/видео.html
Now already have canon 90D in market but I still buy 7d mark 2 really awesome
I'd hold off on the 7D Mark II now as it was discontinued in May 2019 sadly.
The 90D does seem like its natural successor from what I have seen.
I really hope someone answers me.. so i'm planning on buying the 7D Mark l, my budget can't go further for the Mark ll, i'm going to use it for cinematic vids 90% of the time, also i need to know can i get good quality at low light too, or i should rather the EOS M50 or 77D? I will really appreciate if someone answers me, because seriously i don't know what to do.
Hi Mikayel. Personally, if you can't go for the 7D Mark II due to budget then either look now at the 77D or the 80D. They both use a newer sensor than the 7D Mark II and perform slightly better in low light from what I have seen. I will be honest, that Canon APS-C cameras are not known for their low light abilities. With the 7D Mark II, in video, I take it to a maximum of 3200 and even then, the image is starting to fall apart. I don't know enough about the M50 to comment on it other than to say I don't think Canon are going to be continuing that line much more now they have brought out the new EOS R and the RF mount as from speaking to a Canon rep, the M50 didn't take off the way Canon wanted it to, hence the new EOS R.
Let me know what you decide to go for. Have you thought about what lenses to get with a new camera?
@@jw_film I really appreciate it, so overall i think i'm going for the 77D, i just need to know can i get good image on low-light for car editing, the lens EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM.
@@kingmikayel If you've got the cash to spare I'd look into getting either the Canon 17-55mm f2.8 or the Sigma 17-50 f2.8. They are fixed aputure so the exposure won't change as you adjust the focal length and it'll let in 1-2 stops more light than the kit lens.
I've got the Sigma 17-50mm myself and it's a solid lens for the price and I've always found it has good usability with the Dual Pixel Autofocus on My 7D Mark II. Plus the IS works well.
@@jw_film so the kit ones won't do the job meeh? 🙂
@@kingmikayel If you want to shoot in low light, having an f2.8 lens will really help.
Hi quick question regarding your sigma 17-50 f2.8. does it rattle when you shake it lightly? i just received mine and it does. wanted to know if it was normal and is that because it's not weather sealed. thank you.
I have to say this is something I haven't noticed at all in the entire time that I've owned that lens but yes mine does rattle! I think it might be the image stabiliser rattling around as when its attached to the camera and the camera is on, the rattling isn't there.
Thanks so much, i thought i may have had a defected lens, i have noticed its quieter when its attached also. i notice all kinds of sounds, sorry if it will make you listen to that lens more now, but know you will not suffer alone. lol 😁
It is still relevant if you already own one!
Can't argue with that!
I just bought the 7d mark ii , but I’m starting to regret it cause I’m gonna only use it for portrait photoshoot did i make a good choice?
Hi Rah, I'm only really use my 7D Mark II now for two scenarios, one is for long exposure landscapes and the other is for studio work with products. When I have used the 7D Mark II in the studio, I have always been really impressed with the images and how much clarity there has been. Some of the portrait stills in this video are some that I use for portfolio work today. While an APS-C camera isn't normally chosen for portrait work, I think its still a great choice. I did a shoot a couple of weeks back with another photographer who had the 5D Mark IV and aside from actual file sizes, we were struggling to tell them apart when using the same lens.
Of course it's relavent, does not matter how old the camera is. It's all about the photographer not the camera.
Couldn't agree with you more there Alan!
I have sold my EOS 7D Mark I due to the fact that it can't produce the same image quality found in the EOS 5D Mark I. Is there any improvement in image quality on the EOS 7D Mark II when compared to the EOS 7D Mark I?
I would say there is a considerable improvement over the MK 1 but it's been a long time since I've used a MK 1. There is about a 2 stop ISO difference from memory
Technically, the difference is slightly less than a stop. www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-7D-Mark-II-versus-Canon-EOS-7D___977_619
Hey James, i noticed You're quite responsive in comments section.
Could you help me out mate?
I have two second hand options for same price, I can either get a second hand 200D mii with 1k stutter count or 7D mii with 50k shutter count and battery grip, both have 18-55mm lens included.
My primary use is to click pictures & videos of Yoga workouts.
Please suggest which option to go for? Also, if i buy another lens which one should it be for my purpose?
Would really appreciate if you responded man. Love from India🇮🇳❣️
Hey there! I do try and keep on top of the comments :-)
I think if it was me, I'd go for the 7D Mark II for the increased autofocus, image quality and dual card slots so I would have redundancy when shooting.
Lens wise I've never gone wrong with my Tamron 24-70. You lose a bit on the wider end because it's meant for EF not EF-S but it's a fantastic workhorse lens. Before that I traded in the 18-55 and got a Sigma 17-50 f2.8 which while not as sharp as the 18-35mm, still did a very respectable job.
Hope that helps with the decision :-)
Great video thanks
I have my Canon 7D mark ii since 2014, but I want an upgrade for filmmaking and video travel. Do you recommend to change it o invest in better lenses?
What lenses do you have?
I think if you're looking for a mix for filming and stills at the moment then either the Panasonic S1 or A7III for the best of both worlds is your best bet in June 2019.
I'm still hanging onto my 7D Mark II for stills only but will be getting a GH5S for video
@@TheVirusGuy A Tamron 24-70 V1, a Canon 70-200 f 2.8 and a Canon 10-18 f4.5-5.6 STM
For video, Panasonic S1 is the current king. And Panasonic just dropped $300 off their price.
You want a upgrade for filmmaking and you are looking for other lenses....why....i would choose a cam with better specs..but...there are so many good lenses....personally i like the tamron G2 trinity....but if you want a light , good, and affordable wideangle aps-c lens....take a look at this one...tamron 10-24 f/ 3.5- 4.5 di II vc hld......
Compared to what the Sony A7III can do with an MC-11 adaptor, the 7dMkII and D500 are now very overpriced to compete. Still relevant? I want to say yes. I thought the 7D Mkii was a great wildlife/sports camera. A good allrounder for most daylight/cloudy situations. Perhaps one of the best for dynamic range balance (beautiful green colours for landscapes). Low light performance is debatable. I personally found the 80d much better in that area. But after switching the A7III its on a seriously different level.
Would I have a 7dmkii as a backup? Yes but not for retail price only if it was second hand. As you've pointed out in your video the 7dmkii is a great portrait camera and found it the best to use for art like wildlife photos. Id be happy to use it for stationary subjects. But for tracking the A7III is unbeatable. I was losing to many shots to focus problems on the 7d mkii.
It's something that I would actually really like to test out is a comparison between the A7III and the 7D Mark II. I think a fair comparison would be to cap the A7 III in its crop mode and see how the images compare. Definitely going int the calendar to see if I can do it in early 2019.
What lenses are you using with your A7III and MC-11 adapter?
@@jw_film I would definitely recommend it. I only use my old Canon fit Sigma 150-600 contemporary on it for wildlife (all I need) and a Sony 28-70mm kit lens which I intend to replace with a Canon 16-30 f4.
A7III crops down to 10mp. Its a bit strange in that mode. I tried it briefly today. Not sure in terms of price it would be a fair test to compare in crop. Its a completely different beast to the 7dmkII.
@@Pan3optic3on Ah ok, I didn't know it cropped in that much on the sensor. It's still something I want to test out.
I had a shoot last week where the b cam was a GH5S and the video quality from that was truly excellent.
Definitely in two minds over the A7III and GH5S.
@@jw_film Its definitely worth a test. The A7IIIR will crop down to 18mp but the A7III to 10mp. Its not much of a big deal. I crop a lot of my bird shots down anyway so its kind of handy to have it there if I need it. Video AF on the A7III is a bit scary. AFing at 500-600mm. Couldnt get that kind of speed with the 7Dmkii or 80d. I dont shoot video normally but was hoping the A7 III could handle it. Im glad it can. Ive not used the GH5S so couldnt comment. As far as wildlife, landscapes and astro is concerned its hands down a truely awesome performer.
A friend of mine still uses his 7d mkii alongside his A7 III. I dont blame him, there is just something about the look of the pictures that is truely beautiful especially for portraits and a variety of other subjects. The owl in my profile pic was take with the 7Dmkii, one of my favs. Will probably grab another secondhand one in future.
@@Pan3optic3on The owl is really stunning. You've definitely given me some food for thought with the A7III so I'm going to have to try and test it out.
A balanced series of comments. I am not that interested in video on my "stills" cameras one of which is the 7D MkII, when I want to do video, I have a couple of Panasonic camcorders which ergonomically are designed for the purpose. Not because I am a "Canon fanboy" but I do have a large degree of empathy with their apparent view that if you want to do video, move on to their C range or the equivalents from other brands. In fact I suspect that if video was my priority, I would probably buy the new Black Magic 'Pocket camera' ( some pocket !).
I use mt 7D mainly for wildlife and probably a couple of airshows during the Summer, its auto focus and fps is still pretty awesome, a few months back I did a 42 frame RAW burst of a startled Heron taking off from a reed bed and every frame is in focus. Whilst I am sure that the Sony A series are wonderful cameras, the point is that I'm into taking pictures, not buying hardware and so long as my current kit is producing the results, I can see no reason to switch.
You are right John, as a stills camera the 7D Mark II is still fantastic and I find more and more reasons to use it everyday. Maybe less for video these days but I've recently started getting into long exposure photography and I've been blown away by the quality of them.
A 42 frame RAW burst??!? I would love to see even one of those frames. Did you post them online?
Glad you liked the video :-)
@@jw_film "My Heron" so far no simply because I haven't found a way to do so, 42 frames is too much as a sequence, way too boring for average viewers so I have been experimenting, montages, cutting out frames for a smaller sequence and so on, haven't yet found something I like that conveys the 'majesty' of it all. The trick to capturing that of course is the fastest CF/SD cards you can afford, I actually also have an M6 system I use as a travel/lightweight option and using Lexar 1000 cards rated at up to 150 MB/s. I've got 17 frame RAW bursts out of that before the buffer fills up however, it does raise an issue that brings a smile to my face when people bang on about how many 'frames per second'.
When I heard that the Sony A9 could do 20 I just laughed because unless you are a photo journalist with your camera plugged into ethernet and a picture editor sorting out the shots for you, that would be my idea of Hell. At an airshow last Summer I photographed a truly skilled pilot flying a Pitts Special stuntplane sideways, just a few feet off the ground whilst trailing smoke. Later in Lightroom I thought, "Well out of these 35 images, which 34 am I going to delete ?" Point being, at least my Heron sequence is different frame to frame whereas as I was shooting the Pitts pretty much filling the frame, there was hardly any change shot to shot !
and i'm sitting here with my canon 7d mark 1
That's a rare camera you have since commercially they only released a 7D and a 7D Mark II. What's different between a 7D and a 7D Mark I ?
How dare you??? ; )
love my 7D mark 2..
I do feel it should be relevant as it is only 5 years old. I use cameras that are well over 50 years old. Long before built in obsolescence was invented. I use modern cameras too but the thing is no camera gets worse than the day it was first marketed.
Jeremy Evans I couldn’t agree more, I can’t understand the logic that says that as soon as a new camera comes out all the images taken with a previous model are suddenly rubbish. I have several cameras older than my wife, and a couple of years ago she bought me a Zorki 4K and Jupiter 8 from the year she was born. For many reasons it’s my favourite camera, with my 5DII coming in second.
Hey there James, I bought my canon 7d mark II second hand, and the ISO speed I cannot change it to 125 or 160 only round numbers like 100, 200, 400 , 800 and so on. How can I change this in the settings menu? Great video btw!
You dont want to. The previous owner did this for a reason
@@TravellWillUnravel Why would I nor want to do that. It's preety convenient. Why t
Did he do this then?
@@diogosousa6 Some say that the intermediate settings do not give the same image quality as the 'round' numbers, although I cannot say I have found that. I often shoot at iso 640, especially if using the 7D2, where high iso quality is not as good as a full frame. If you want to change it back, go to the camera symbol which is over to the right of the menu (the last one before the star for my menu settings) and you will see iso increments, where you can set it back to third stops.
@@davidschenck6894 thank you so much for your help!
Did you solve it?
I have owned the 7D original and now the 7Dii as canon are not developing the 7Diii, nor do canon have decent alternative for the 7Dii. The AF system is amazing, dual card slots DP AF for video is great ( though touch screen would have been bloody useful ! ) solid build, witness ( optical ) flash control.
Though I do fine the images touch some compared to sony NEX5R & A6500, and nikon D500. There is an aggressive AA filter which harms stills. Also I believe today's market want smaller, more portable cameras and lenses. As some venues will not allow 'professional cameras' which the 7Dii does look like. A sony A6500 and 18-55 or 55-210 do not look that professional.
The EOS R IMO is too expensive for a cobbled together 5Div in a new body. Both IBIS is a real Beal breaker for me as cameras now are jack of all trades and specific to just one type of photography type, ie sports, landscape, portraits etc.
Todays market are being told by camera manufacturers that they want smaller, so they can sell new cameras. I have small hands and relatively long fingers, 7d Mk2 fits perfectly..... Still think if you are looking for bang for the buck the 7d mk2 is great for wildlife photography
What is the best portrait lens for 7d mark 2
For me undoubtedly it's the 70-200mm f2.8 IS II. It's razor sharp and accurate 99/100 shots. It's a full frame lens so you're using it to its full potential but I've never been disappointed with the lens and I use it every day.
Before that I Used the Canon 24-105mm f4 and the difference was night and day.
I am very tempted by the Sigma 85mm though.
What are you currently leaning towards?
Its relevant as much as the photographer using it :) Thanks to marketing, we are always looking for the latest camera.. But, the quality of our photos? The subject, the story? Well yes, there is a leap in technology from my 70d, but i concentrate on the photos :) Nice video!!!
Thanks Stefan! :-)
Great presentation.Thank you.
Thank you!
Nice man! I can agree with you on the review as well, since I too use a 7D Mark ii, but with a 24-70 f2.8 lens. Perfect for automotive photography. I post all of my edits on Instagram: lensaffect if you want to see.
Same thoughts on the EOS R, that would be a good upgrade/ one to buy as they're coming out with a L series adapter for that camera which is life saving.
The EOS R is a step in the right direction but it's a very small step and sadly not right for me.
Are you considering the R more for stills or for video?
I don’t need video anyway. For bird photography, especially when it comes to small birds and just range and speed count, nothing goes over the Canon 7D Mark II. I hope Canon really publishes in 2019 then Mark III.
I'm definitely waiting to see what Canon bring to the table in 2019. I don't think we can judge it all on the EOS R. It's main feature is the new lens mount and that has true potential