Everyone is buying this $6000 point & shoot Camera... Why???
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 ноя 2022
- OVER 700,000 VFX / MOTION GRAPHIC ASSETS🙏🏻 📸 - bit.ly/mattimotionarray 🔥 📸 COLOR GRADED USING NEW CINE SONY LUTS 📸🔥 = bit.ly/CineSonyLUTs
BEST PLACE TO GET MUSIC FOR ALL FILMMAKERS (FREE TRIAL) - bit.ly/2sdiLrH
MY CINEMATIC LIGHTROOM PRESETS - bit.ly/2WGjdcT
MAKE YOUR AUDIO SOUND CRISP (PRESETS FOR PREMIERE + FCPX) - bit.ly/3fKrPY3
BEST AFFORDABLE STOCK FOOTAGE + 2 FREE MONTHS 📸 - bit.ly/artgridMatti
🔥NEW COMPLETE MOTION GRAPHICS PACK FOR RUclips 🔥 - bit.ly/MHScando
FASTEST ANIMATED TITLES EVER FOR PREMIERE - bit.ly/2SLtZy8
EASY, FAST MOTION GRAPHICS FOR YOU - goo.gl/FdPsDN
MUSIC PERFECT FOR CLIENT VIDEOS (2 MONTHS FREE) - bit.ly/35ecucU
GET YOUR MATTI MERCH - bit.ly/32l5EED
BUSINESS INQUIRIES ONLY - CONTACTMATTIH@GMAIL.COM
MY GEAR THAT I USE ↓↓↓
BEST VLOGGING CAMERA IN 20221 - geni.us/B8oh1wm
MY ALL TIME FAV VLOGGING LENS - geni.us/GVm0an
MY BEAST STUDIO/DOC CAMERA - bhpho.to/39r3vbn
BEST GIMBAL OUT THERE - geni.us/R4u1
MY GO TO VARIABLE ND's - geni.us/WegKgS
GREAT LOW LIGHT LENS - geni.us/iLEkS
ABSOLUTE FAVORITE DRONE - geni.us/bMGzlf
TINY AFFORDABLE DRONE - geni.us/ldy7
BEST VLOGGING MIC - geni.us/t2DBNA
PERFECT TRAVELLING TRIPOD - geni.us/9wu7
BEST LIGHT FOR RUclips - geni.us/S5wLH
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
IF YOU WANT TO SEND SOMETHING
Suite 276
12-16715 Yonge St
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
L3X 1X4
MY SOCIALS
INSTAGRAM - goo.gl/nz245Z
TWITTER - goo.gl/G3J5nS 
Кино
DO NOT BUY THIS CAMERA AS YOUR FIRST AND ONLY CAMERA 😂 Its incredible but there are better ways to spend your first moneys 🙏🏻
It’s so tempting
Totally agree, There are way better than this for My 1st camera 📷
And what would those cameras be for someone that wants something versatile (the do all well camera) to take amazing pictures of family memories? Something relatively lightweight?
Buy the Q nt Q2
Bought it as my second and only camera😅 sold Sony a7iii and 3 lenses to afford it
#1 reason…Leica has deep influencer pockets. It’s so interesting how so many influencers hit their channels to speak on this camera within weeks of each other
Definitely. The Q2 released in 2019 so the fact that everyone is just putting out videos now is suspect.
I agree but at the same time, as someone who bought a Leica just before this trend began… I get it. Honestly though, I find it weird hearing these guys plug it now because tbh when I first got into this stuff heavily in 2015, I went out and bought stuff on their influence and the Leica stuff was something I had to discover myself through other professionals I was around personally and seeing what they were producing rather than it being marketed to me, so idk, I feel like these plugs almost take away that enjoyment; it becomes less about the individual experience which Leica prides themselves on, with keeping the film camera feel etc. even in digital and just turns it into another commercial product in the pile.
Yeah they must have a new marketing manager that understands youtube influencer potential to drive sales.
They should mention if the Brands are paying to make videos. Else it's very Dishonest!!
The honest truth is I find these guys just love to flex how much money they got. Matti doesn’t even know why the images look so nice… it’s cause of the legendary Leica glass!
It seems Leica is like the Rolex of cameras. A lot of people seem to buy them because they can afford Leica, they like the brand image and want to associate themselves with it. From a design and technology stand point they are incredible but financial constraints will limit who owns a Leica more than passion for photography. There are a lot of talented people who’s best work won’t be shot on a Leica.
You know "Having a Leica doesn't mean you become an excellent photographer, just that you are a Leica consumer"... said someone one day 😉
I got an original Q for 1/3 of the price. Same lens sala body only a 24mp sensor and not weather resistant. Still 1/3 of the price and I love it. That lens is incredible.
@@joao.s.cardosowas looking for someone to ask this to…is the lens comparatively sharper than say a G master lens from Sony or an RF Lens from Canon? 🤔
@@2011troya i had a 100-400 GM from Sony but not recent glass from Canon. It’s different I believe. The GM lens from sony are amazing. But the fact that you can shoot straight at the sun with no flare with the summilux, and from f1.7 to f16 without having to worry about refraction sets these apart from everyone else. If all you care about is sharpness then most hight end lens from any brand are really good. Still this summilux… there is something different about it.
Obviously, Fuji x100v is great, but film is special and I’d choose a Leica and Fuji film over the digital because it forces you to be more deliberate. Digital iterations are cool and made for a seamless process. But some of my favorite cameras include contax g and rolleflex. I’ve spent so much on cameras and equipment, and my Leicas are well use, my m6 is used for than my m11, and the m11 is far better than the camera in this video. But the cameras I use the most are a canon 1d, a Sony a7r5, Fuji x100v, and my iPhone 14 pro. My favorite cameras to use are the Leica m6, the contax g, and the rolleflex. So it’s definitely a passion for me and I don’t think anyone is restricted by a price, they can always rent it and get what they need for much cheaper. But the quality is there and the experience of using such a camera is exciting. Lenses are much more important, such as Carl zeiss, which I have many of. But since most photography these days is digital, even film transferred to digital, editing the photos extremely to the point it’s nowhere near what you see in real life, that’s what sucks. A good camera and good lens needs no editing, a good camera and editing needs no fancy lens, good editing and lens can make cheap cameras seem better. I’d say, this is why genuine film is the best because the developing process is much more tedious and has room for editing photos in a unique way. Nobody needs a lot, just a cheap camera can be used without any fancy lens, like even .3 mp and the one who takes the photo uses their eye to capture wonderful moments. I’m annoyed by those who think they can just disturb reality and make everything artificial just for a photo, but in some application, it’s a cool thing. The best pics are truly organic and it’s done by not inserting yourself into the chaos, but observing as a sovereign entity.
Matti: "All cameras look the same"
Fuji: 😨🥶😭
Haha except for Fuji
I was thinking this 😂
I was thinking this exactly! Obviously not the same thing, but an X100V is a much more affordable alternative to the Q2 :)
Also the experience on the fuji line is incredible.
First thing I thought was "damn, that looks almost exactly like a Lumix GX9" with a slightly cleaner back
Peter really is an influencer's influencer. Ever since he made the video I seen so many people buying into this.
This. Peter is your favorite influencer's favorite influencer.
Yes, They are all selling their left testicle to buy this Bomb of a camera!!
This feels like viral marketing. Either way, I returned my Q2 after 2 weeks of use. The image quality was no better than my Fuji X100V and the Leica is just downright uncomfortable to shoot without needing to death grip the lens with your left hand.
I put the money towards an X1D II, which I traded for a GFX 100S, and then traded that camera recently for an X-T5. Now that is a camera that’s truly a joy to shoot with in every aspect. Can’t recommend it enough!
Contemplating both the GFX100s and the X2D
Viral marketing and more like cunning trickery to influence audience to shell out more money that they don't have. Influencers like these should be purged on 4th of july!!
Why the T5 over the GFX?
@@CineGui Huh?
@@rockyBalboa6699 You're a dork.
I have the X100V, same sort of thing as this camera. I absolutely love it, it's incredible. I honestly can't see how the Leica could be worth the extra over the Fujifilm, unless you have so much money that the price difference is completely insignificant.
Started with an X100V, then discovered Leica with the Q2. It definitely worth the price and is way better than the X100V (which is a very good camera btw). Full frame + lens + Leica color science make it unique. I tried to move to the SL2-S to be able to change the lenses, but never got the results and feelings I got with the Q2. This camera is unique.
@@hugodouchet is there anything between the two, in terms of cost and performance? an older leica model?>
@@iamrichlol Yes, the Q. But honestly: Don't get fooled, I have two Leicas (M10 and Q) and still bought the X100V. Too many people are romancing a lot with the Leicas but they are not the holy grail as people want to make them …
This Matti guy brags like a liar. Nobody is buying this camera. 95% of people cannot afford this camera. You can actually buy a RED Komodo 6k for $6000.
Had both. Not the same 😀
Photography is only a hobby of mine so I rock the fujifilm x100v. I won’t lie, I would have loved a leica but it was out of my budget. Maybe one day. But if anyones looking for a solid small compact point and shoot, try out the x100v:) much more affordable and still gives you that exciting feeling to go out and take photos!
I second this recommendation - I just bought an X100V and really enjoy it. I’ve shot professionally for years, and this Fuji is making me fall in love with photography all over again.
All x100 models are wonderful, don't needa shell out even that much for a V
I had the pleasure of using the Leica Q2 and it is solid, the lens is probably the best part of the package. Definitely fun to use and love the shutter action. I personally prefer an interchangeable lens setup. For a lightweight, travel friendly and great quality results I love the Sony A7C + 24mm 1.4 GM. ($2900 setup w/ amazing results and portability) or paired with the Sony 28mm f/2 ($2000 setup and super compact and lightweight). Another more budget friendly fixed lens option would be the FUJIFILM X100V ($1400). Nevertheless, Leica users do not choose Leica's for practicality, there are several other factors at play. Enjoy whatever gear you have!
I'll stick with my Fuji x100F (the ultimate holiday, walk-around camera for hipsters which is actually semi-affordable).
I use to carry so much gear with me and sold all of it for the q2. So worth it. Now I just carry the q2, griii and the DJI 3 pro. It’s the lightest thing ever!
The image is what blows my mind more than anything else. I also really love that the design is minimal but very high quality. But again the images. Every single image I see out of this camera just baffles me with how good it looks
Would be interesting to see how the images look to you when you don’t know they came out of a Leitz Camera.
"Everyone is buying this" ....Matti hangs out with a different level of person than I do. haha
you guys work so well together. Love watching the beauty that comes from your videos.
I own the Q2 and the canon 1dx2. The dynamic range on this Q2 is superior. I’ve tested them side by side. It is the CLOSEST image in terms of quality to my RED cinema camera which I use for video. That’s why I love it. Looks filmic. Doesn’t clip easily. Shadow detail. Worth every penny.
It is not a camera for studio work IMO, as it’s a fixed wide angle lens and this focal length is not ideal for faces unless you want that distortion effect. It’s perfect for what it is. Point n shoot. Daily lifestyle. Moments. Leica is king.
I feel like in every video you have a new graphics style. I like it! It makes you unique.
Ty 😊 🙏🏻
Title Edit: EVERYONE WHO IS WEALTHY is buying this camera. YOU’RE WELCOME!!!
My digital point-and-shoot EDC is a Leica C from 2012. Still works perfectly and produces great pics.
This is the camera you buy when you have more money than sense.
😂😂👍🏽
The Q3 is coming in 2023. I'm waiting for one, the Q2 is serving very well! The price doesn't matter after you start using it! It is beautiful!
I love my q2. It’s not the only camera in the equipment bag…but it’s the one that I enjoy using the most. It will never be used to photograph birds in flight or fast action sports (no phase detection capability), but oh boy, Landscapes, Street, night photography, it can’t be beat..the full frame resolution capability allows so many crop options in post-.edit when shooting RAW (in camera crop @35, 50, 75 when shooting Jpeg. The 28 mm Summilux 1:1.7 is a dream. I thought it would be difficult to get use to 28mm. Not so! AF is sweet! But shooting MF is sweeter! And the MACRO feature is really nice! Another great feature is how the MENU is designed…so logical and intuitive!
It is a great camera, just sold a Leica Q. It is mostly a matter of form factor. I like the rendering and the size, It is also great that its almost silent. I bought a A7C with FE24mm 1.4, expected some regret but It is honestly a better ”camera” in every way including rendering but it is bigger and lack mechanical shutter. The Leica Q/Q2 is a very convenient camera but honestly I think it is a bit overrated, loved it while I had it but I would pick A7C + 24mm 1.4 every time If I got the choice. I would love to have a Leica Q2 though:)
Matti! I’m glad you like it, I’d like to say that I love it. Going from the DLUX 3 to the Q then selling it to get the Q2, it’s so practical and the results are magical with some experience and effort.
I love waiting to get my images back. I hardly EVER go back to look at my digital photos. But when I get my film back… I get to be reminded of the moment I snapped that photo.
I got Panasonic GX85 with Panasonic Leica 15mm F1.7 Summilux. I treat it as point and shoot. This lens is glued to it. Unbelievably good combo for around $700 if buying used. Very underrated and overlooked.
Love this combo. Hopefully I can afford Leica one day.
100%
Try it with the 7artisians 35 f1.2 manual lens. It’s not the perfect lens but does awesome in black and white
So glad to see more and more people finally coming around to realize that the intention that goes into creating a product matters. And the output of that intention is high build quality as well as incredible user experience. People shrug that off too often and I've never understood why. Because when something is built well, it comes through for the user and it unlocks creativity that we don't expect it to unlock.
you maybe right but this looks like hype hype and more hype... for example a Canon r5 is a fabulous piece of engineering beutiful to hold and use and produces incredible images this whole Leica hype is similar to what happens with watches you can pay 200000 for a watch sure an incredible piece of engineering/art but ulimately who cares? well mainly very rich people who dont know what to do with their money and like to impress thier rich friends !
@@tonijones2187 there definitely is a hype train happening but there’s always a hype train happening. Like there’s also one for the X100V right now, or there’s been one for the Leica M6 for a while. Or there was that hype train for “gear matters” all of a sudden last year
Seriously? Most of the people buying the Q2 probably aren't very good photographers and the Q2 isn't going to magically make them into good photographers. People are buying them because it's the hip thing to do right now and they want to be seen with the Leica.
Fujifilm s cameras are different too and lots of fun to shoot with! But I love the Q2 Monochrome too!
one of the best Leica Q2 promotion videos i have ever seen. Well spoken and great energy, thanks you for this! :)
Rocking a Leica M3 for daily documentation. Love it sooooo much!!!! A 60 year old camera, does all I need for daily, fun, inspiring, and most of all, gosh it looks amazing!!!
What unblocked my creative flow recently was when I finally figured out how to use Lightroom/Lightroom Classic and Adobe Cloud together. Now I can easily take photos everywhere and edit them on my phone, and everything is then backed up on my NAS. Having a good workflow is key to take photos.
Always so curious to the settings while making those photos✌🏻
I’ll also add that I have a 28mm vintage lens that I crowned as my favorite. That focal length seems to be the perfect all-around versatile length.
I find this brand name overhyped!. When you listen to famous street photographer like Henry Cartier Bresson interviews, he states that he liked the Leica M at the time because of its ease of use with the technology of the time but if he was alive today he probably would use a Ricoh GRIII. Even the Early Film Leica, the films were very difficult to load, and they are very unpractical to use. They are certainly beautifully design with this distinguished industrial design! But not practical!. Unfortunately influencers, and advertisers makes you fall in love with the camera more than the resulting picture. Imagine looking at a Rambrant painting and worrying about the brand name of the brushes and oils paint the artist used? I Give Leica my congratulation on how successful they are though!.
"Everyone" and "$6000" don't go well together at all.
That said, the photos look amazing.
Yeah...Matti and I clearly run in difference circles.
I shot products, portraits, and a wedding on my Q and it works. You just gotta think outside the box
Fujifilm is not boring, but I agree that everything else feels the same nowadays. Don't really see anything that my X-T4 + 23mm f/1.4 R LM WR can't do, the end result looks and feels kinda the same, but you still have to edit the photos as there are no recipes. Also, Leica costs almost 3 times more.
That’s how I also felt when I got and used the Q2 two years ago. Because its a fixed lens camera, it makes you think like when using a film camera. Saying its the best camera I ever used? No, but it suits me just right. Thanks for another great video.
The title should be: Everyone with Motion Array sponsorship is buying this Camera.
I must start off, I still shoot Sony but I just got a Fuji X-H2 setup. I am loving the colour science coming out of it. So, I get why people would be buying Leica cameras for there beautiful look. Enjoy the camera bud. Oh, the other reason I went Fuji, I am wanting to go medium format but want to wait a generation.
I would love to be one of those "everyone's" , great video!!! The Q2 is a nice little box!!!
This camera strips it down to a minimalist pure experience for me. Stunning build quality. Not as capable for fast run and gun stuff (where I mostly use Canon). Used intentionally, it becomes about way more than photos.
If you don’t have the money for this type of camera from Leica, but still want to have the same sort of photography experience, the Fujifilm X100V it’s an amazing Option!
Amazing Video!
Yes!!! You are definitely right! Ohmygaad! It’s trending right now that it’s backordered and jacked up.
Yup! I got one too. By far and away my favorite camera I've ever owned. I take it pretty much everywhere. No excuse not too.
Rented it out right before Pete dropped his video about it & absolutely loved it. Now y'all together are going to make me actually buy it haha 🔥
The q was originally designed to mimic the iPhone focal length. It’s something we subconsciously recognize as familiar but elevated.
This is by far the most beautiful camera money can buy. I’m happy for Leica that they have this success with this camera. They should just build an S-Q1 with the same form factor that uses L-Mount glass.
I really wanted to buy a Q2 but I am really struggling with the fact that it is 28mm. I love the 35mm and I really struggle / don't like 28mm. I have bought a 28mm F2 for my current system to try see if I forcing myself to use it will help. It's annoying because my alternative is a Leica M10R or Leica M11 and a 35mm for around double the price and without autofocus, or a macro mode, or the weather sealing. I wish they would make one with a 40mm like Ricoh did for the GR3 that would probably work.
Matti, you too!! LOL. Great choice. I also fell for the Q2, but wanted it to be quite different from my other camera, so went with the Monochrom version as I shoot mostly B&W. Love it!!
My Q2 rekindled my love for photography. I want to take it everywhere. And that Leica look… 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻
I bought a q1 a few months ago, main differences being half of the megapixels and no weather sealing whereas the q2 does, but it was 2k direct from Leica Manchester with a 1yr warranty. Save some coin and start with a q1! U less you can afford to shell out 6k
I picked a used Q1 up for $2k from Adorama and have been SO happy with it. Everything I dreamed it would be!
Reminds me of my old Lumix GF1 with the 20mm 1.7, that camera was so ahead of the game.
read the title and was like not everyone, I am most definitely not buying a 6k point and shoot lmaooo
The magic is in the lens. So much so I got an original Q with the 24mp. It’s an amazing camera still today.
I don’t mind fixed lens, but 28mm for me is a deal breaker. 35mm would be a lot better, it’s the standard street photography lens, 28 just have always a bit too much space.
And really for me I would much rather be stuck with a 50mm if I can’t change the lens. Sure there’s some cases where you can’t take photo, but the rest of the time you’ll have much better photos. It also force you to move. I use my 50mm like most people use a 24-70, and trust me… i take a lot of amazing photos :) for group photos indoor would be the challenge 🤪 but not really a problem for artistic photos
use the 35mm crop mode on the q2, the sensor is 45mp, it doesn't affect much on the iq
Let’s face it, the $6000 price tag is the real deal breaker for all of us..
The fact that it is fixed at all is the real deal breaker, there is no realistic way to make everyone happy, pretty soon they will sell lens adapters your can attach to get a farther mm and at that point you might as well have bought a new mirrorless or gone with the rx100 vii for much cheaper.
That being said I think 28mm was a fine focal length to settle on.
I have to say that 28mm used to be my least used focal length. Wide but not wide enough. Much preferred the 24mm focal length. Tried several compact cameras with fixed 28mm lenses (Fuji and Ricoh) and didn’t really gel. Then, last ditch attempt, got a used Q and it was a revelation. Now own Q2 and it’s my go to camera. The one I reach for before my SL2 or my R5.
If you're addicted, take the Q1 in used, costs the half and has the same awesome feeling. loving my Q-P. Still awesome in 2022 and the especially the Q-P ist pretty awesome. :D I never was a Leica fanboy and yes, a little bit overpriced, but the joy of shooting comes back into my hands like Matti describes.
I just recently was finally able to afford a used Q1 that I found a good deal on after selling off some other gear. It’s as much of a dream as I had hoped it would be, and don’t feel like it’s even a little bit outdated in 2022. Q2 is awesome, but I’m so happy with my Q1! 📷🔴🤙🏽
@@TheGroovyGuitarDude awesome decision. Congrats and have fun with this beauty. No reason for the q2. 😀
Never selling my Q-P. Such a beast of an undercover stealth camera.
Welcome to the Leica wormhole. I got started with the Leica XU (which is an INCREDIBLE CAMERA) as my side "fun" camera. I took a trip to Iceland using the Leica XU and the Sony A7rii (which was the best Sony at the time). The Sony was my main camera with a lot of great glass etc. When I came home, most of my favorite shots were with the XU, a vastly inferior camera to the Leica XU on paper (well except for the Sumilux lens which might be one of the greatest lenses of all time). I was hooked and sold my Sony first for the Q2, then added the SL2 with an SL Summicron 35 & 75. The only downside is I can't imagine a better camera. My SL2 is my favorite camera of all time. It is a joy to use, and wow, have the images been great. I now have a major exhibit here in Miami at our main performing arts institution, and I think switching to Leica had something to do with that. Final thought it's only a matter of time until you get your hands on an SL2 which you will love.
This video pushed the Leica so hard. For those normal humans who don’t want to overpay for a red dot, a Fujifilm XT-4 will also give you the analog camera feeling.
leica doenst need this channel or a push.
That reason #4 is that Peter has one. That being said, I have had mine for a little over a year, and I take it everywhere. And my Canons come out less often. Looking forward to what the Q3 will offer. Enjoy!
Just recently sold my Q2 for the XT5 with a f1.4 lens plus more than a grand to spare 😇
The Q2 is an amazing camera though, for people who want to shoot daily or travel photos without the hassle of buying and swapping lenses, it’s a no-brainer if you have the budget. That said, even after the firmware update I still find the need to pull out the RAW files for almost every photo, which isn’t a great experience when I’m just traveling and documenting daily life and the main reason why I went Fuji instead.
But the Q2 is a dream to hold and shoot with, for those who have the budget I highly recommend buying a secondhand Q2 in good condition to try it out 😊
I thought long and hard about buying a Q2. In the end, I bought a Sony A1 with 35mm GM. Same money, more versatile.
Love mine!! So much fun to use… literally take it everywhere… I only rarely bust out my A1 anymore 😅
Matti please don't tempt me on a Monday like this!😂 Much love from East Tennessee USA🙏🏼
That illusive “Leica Look” is just so magical and unique. I recently was finally able to get a used Q at a good price, and it’s everything I dreamed it would be! 📷🔴
For anyone with the money, it's a no brainer. And it's not only about the 6k, it's also about the price of a single battery (150$), a charger (145$) or a camera strap in the official store. you have to be ready to spend A LOT of cash not only at purchase but also after that you'll be paying extra every single time.
For the rest of us who have to invest carefully, probably the better option is the X100V, XE4 + some lens, Ricoh etc…
Battery is $285
An X-T5 with the XF33 F1.4 or the second gen XF 56 f1.2 would be an excellent alternative and still half the price. I’m a bit biased though. Just got my X-T5 and I’m still in the honeymoon phase. Flawless so far though!
I have the X100V and I honestly can't see how the Leica could be worth the extra over the Fujifilm, unless you have so much money that the price difference is completely insignificant
Battery is $110, charger $75. You guys are so weird for exaggerating like this, just don't buy it.
@@ekim333 just looked it up, you're looking at the price for the Q battery, not the Q2.
If you can’t afford the Leica Q2 (like me) I highly recommend the Fujifilm x100v. Trust me, they can battle it out. A lot of the Leica photographers post iPhone quality photos after all the contrast and grain anyway, so trust me.
The Leica Q or any Leica is a unique camera. I am not owning one yet, but a Leica is on the way. The colour science of Leica is fabulous, like it is with Fujifilm or any other camera. This lens/sensor combo is trimmed to perfection - look at the Fujifilm X100 series and how their prices skyrocketed at the moment. However the story is more important than the quality (reproduction) of the image.
However, I need to say something that really distorts the impression. Why putting film frames around a digital images? It has not been analogue? Then you should have shot film in the first place. A digital image without those film borders look quite boring but digital photography is boring because you can instantly see what you have done. Film retains secrets and surprises.
I've had many cameras. The Fuji X100 series is beautiful and takes great photos. The Leica is soo expensive but honestly, it's worth the cost. If you can't get a Fuji, if you can get the Q!
I think, the look of the Leica is like "more organic" than the other digital cameras. I bought my M10 used a few years ago and i dont wanna miss it anymore. Its just fun to use
these images look soooo crispy and delicious! I am still rocking my sony rx100 mark 4! and still love it.
I bought one as my first and love it. Was a little difficult at first but learning as i go and its so fun
sheesh dude bangers only!!!! Air drop me every single one of these. Ima go stand outside your building. BRB
LOL 😂
Peter, I need your boots!
Leica Q2 is amazing - but you can get the same feeling, the same joy, the same creative improvements from its constraints with a $1,500 X100V (If you can find one and you’re budget doesn’t allow for a $6,000 camera)
But the feeling of handling the camera just isn’t the same, and the image quality is not as good imo (I used both of them so yeah
Nope, the Fuji is something totally different.
X100v is amazing, but it is it’s own thing. Both are wonderful cameras for different reasons.
@@frankwu1713 absolutely the image quality isn't the same, that's why I left it out of the statement I made.
X100V gang, where you at?!
Pleaseeeee someone tell me where to find the film frame transition matti use in this video (the transition with the sound of the shutter). I CAN’t find them in motionarray😢
Great video and fomo-producing too! I just want to add that I randomly spotted and said Hi to Alen Palander on Hollywood Blvd in LA in October and he was just as nice and gracious to chat with me. Now maybe I'll run into Matti, Peter...someday! 👍
I got the Q2 when it came out on its release date at 5k, but I had to wait months for it to arrive. It’s the one camera that drove me to dive deeper into photography.
Matti… please do comparison between q2 and Fuji x100v? Major talking point.. and makes me want to save $4k.
Yeah... this is a pretty decent , no bullshit review of this camera. I shoot the reporter version, largely because I feel a little self conscious flashing that red dot which , doesn't seem to be a problem for most buyers. I also shoot a Fuji X 100V . The feel of the Fuji in my hand doesn't offer the same, feels like I'm holding a Porsche, sensual appeal, as the Leica but it does punch way above its weight and certainly way above its price. The Fuji also offers a 35mm full frame perspective, as opposed to the Q2's claimed 28mm view which in reality, it actually wider. This makes the Fuji a little better for portraits than the Leica. If I had to choose between the two, it would be difficult but I would likely land on the X100V. At today's listed price for the two cameras, you can buy 4 Fujis for the price of the Leica. Suddenly , dropping the Fuji doesn't seem quite so dramatic .
I think it’s the deep blacks. The shadows and blacks are so perfect. I love mine too.
I read through most of the comments - and yes, the title is going to irrigate people, so not everyone is buying, but in the case of everyone who can justify buying a 6000 camera for family photos GOOD for you! YOU WORKED HARD! you give back, you teach people to become better versions of themselves! Just now people are so sensitive to Christmas time high prices everywhere... people are just angry nowadays as people are starving etc, families dying
Longtime Leica shooter, last year jumped into them for all my photo and video work. Never turning back!
Just had to imagine Matti and Jimmy Fallon in a dialogue… that’ll be infinite giggling
After a long time i've settled on sony rx1 in overall smaller package for less money. )) Enjoyed you video, great pics!
Hey Matti, thank you for this really nice video. Congrats on your buy of the Leica Q2 and welcome to the Leica community. I totally agree with all the things you said in this video. But there’s one camera which feels much more like a film camera and waits with an huge variety of actual and vintage lenses: The Leica M11. I got myself a Leica M11 from its place of birth, Leitz Park in Wetzlar, Germany. Maybe you get the chance to test one of these 60 Megapixel bad boys, which are technically up to date but nevertheless reduced to the essentials of photography. Greetings from Heidelberg, Germany
this is slowly becoming my favorite channel, i love F1, i love cameras, so i automatically love being here
How is it for low light street photography?
For anyone interested in a Q2, do not buy new… they’re going for $4k on the secondhand market. Feels like an incredible camera, and shoots like a good camera depending on your situation. Not the best in low light, but in sunny lit situations it’s a beast honestly.
The 35 and 50mm frame lines are amazing too. Set it to those, and in post you can crop to your desired focal length. I’d do the Q over the Q2 though.. colors edit closer to film than the Q2. Overall though, Leica colors > anyone else 🙌🏼
Awesome video as always 😎 and very happy for your f1 videos! :)
I dig the q2, Fuji xv100, etc but I could never purchase a fixed lens camera. Anything gets on the sensor over time and then it’s a PITA to get it addressed. Thanks but no thanks. I prefer swappable lenses where can easily take the lens off and blow the sensor within a matter of seconds. Aside from not having access to the sensor, I love the q2 and all the others! Beautiful cameras for sure!
Yeah but the Hasselblad X2D 100C is only a few thousand more... why not go all out?
On a serious note - did you add grain in the post process? It feels like there is some psuedo organic grain thing happening.
The images are really nice and looks so high detailed. I love what I'm seeing.😍
Mate, at the moment I’d say the X100v is the most popular fixed lens point and shoot. It looks and feels different and is nearly 5k cheaper if you can find one in stock
I agree with most of what you said about the Q being to create quick quality images. But if you really want to learn the right way start with 35mm film, if you want easy and quick buy an iPhone, if you're in the middle, buy a full frame dslr with decent features. You'll safe a ton of money over this Q.
*save
I love mine. No overhype, it’s true, and I think most people started to realize how great this camera is 3 years after it was launched.
I think it’s kind of funny how everyone is into Leica nowadays! They have been around for like ever and always had the best quality standards. Even the q2 is on the market for quite some time. I would go for one too if had the extra money, but I think I would rather spend it on the new Leica m6. What’s your thoughts on the upcoming Leica hype?
do a video on the leica sl2s or the m11 next! i love using the sl2s for my car photos, and the 75 prime lens from leica is the sharpest, honestly THE best lens i have EVER used. please cover this in a future video!!
75mm is their best…..35mm APO SL close second.
You can also get the original Q for a 1/3 of the price. Nobody needs 60MP for casual holiday shooting haha
Lol probably right. But hey memories are the most important 😊
The price affects everything else. If they would’ve priced it competitively it would be incredibly average. But because it’s priced so high you automatically like it more for intangible reasons.
It’s like drinking and expensive wine vs a cheap one. You’ll only say the expensive one tastes better when you hear the price.
I love my Leica its only 16mp but I have now found that that doesnt matter, its everything else that makes the camera function which gives crispy shots. I agree with matti tho the price and functionality of these is not a first camera.
Having played around with my friends Q2 it felt okay in hand but to me the ergonomics were just off. I feel like it was built for a very specific hand size so for me the comfort just wasn't there. The image is good, at least what I'd expect a $6k camera to produce. I didn't find it anything special or unique beyond feeling like it had a style filter applied to the image. It was certainly nothing you couldn't get from a quick edit in LR on any other camera. I really don't like having a fixed lens but then my friend (who's not a photographer) bought it because it was a "point and shoot" but much higher quality than other available P&S cameras. So I totally get the appeal especially for those wanting the ease of P&S with the quality of a high end camera. It was definitely a cool camera but if you're a serious photographer then this is definitely more of a novelty than anything else.
Got the Ricoh GRiiiX, it's actually pocketable and allows me to stuff it in my cycling jersey pocket, even with a case, can't say the same about the x100v