Vanguard has amazing graphics, World at War has amazing gameplay and a much more grittier better atmosphere for portraying the real horrors of war so it’s clear which one id rather play.
I prefer vanguard in terms of graphics and some animation But i prefer WAW in terms of everything it has soul and realism to it unlike vanguard Just look at ppsh in vanguard 4:06 its a prime example of weapons its just lifeless dosent feel like a real weapon at all now look at at WAW one, its literally scratches your ears
True even COD2,COD UO,WaW player me who liked Vanguard's Campaign it was a serviceable good WW2 Campaign. But ain't COD 2 or WaW it's just a Hybrid of WW2,WaW and COD 2.Its a 7/10 not 9/10 experience like COD 2 or WaW
@@unlondonbobby3336 true. Ww2 had a cliched story, but at least it wasn’t horrible like vanguard’s where the diverse super soldiers talk about their past while in a cell.
@@Ajay-dy3xw 1. Activision wouldn't let them 2. developer conflict and disagreement on certain decisions 3. Activision would let them 4. Activision being Activision
WaW's animations are basically from the 1st installment, but particularly improved for WaW, except some weapons: M1897 from 2nd(3rd) installment for the reload, their fire animation StG44's Empty reload Garand's Mid-reload
@@ChandranPrema123 no,WAW M1897 is still from COD2. In COD3 the character facing the shotty upward,pump at the 5th shell and insert an extra 6th shell so it can be 5+1. And tbh,it is more proper in COD3 rather than in WaW or COD2 because the mag tube can only contains 5 shells
@@playerslayer6923 it did not feel like cod 4 at all. The atmospheer, the shittier guns (in a good, authentic ww2 sorta way) and just the overall feel of the game was what made it its own game.
that’s what i loved about mw2019, the operator misses the magwell on the first try, it’s a small touch that adds so much character. just look at the fennec reload.
I love for the DD shotgun in Vanguard, the character doesnt even hold the second live shell in place. Activision...if your reading this, which im highly doubting..if you've established something before, its best to keep it going.
See some people unfairly complaining about those being “nostalgic” for World At War so I want to add this. World At War, despite its flaws, will remain an overall better game than Vanguard. The former is a game, a properly good COD. The other is merchandise. Some reload animations are wrong in World At War, such as the bolt-action rifles using a full stripper clip regardless if there’s still rounds in the magazine. Or the ejecting shotgun shell for the Double Barrel after firing. Its sound and graphics quality have also aged a fair bit. But by 2007/08 standards the animations, sounds and graphics were pretty good for their time, and even today the sound design and look/feel of World At War remains rememberable and iconic. Any COD Veteran will freak out if they hear another MP40 knowing that MP40 user is running Juggernaut. Or the soundtrack. The music in this game is amazing. Obviously Vanguard has better graphics and sound quality but overall sound design? No. Music? God no. Inaccurate weapon design, reload animations and other such things? Vanguard has way more, even accounting for it having more weapons. You should expect a newer game to be better than its predecessors in all aspects, and fancy graphics only get you so far. I highly recommend The Act Man’s video on World At War because he explains why it’s a great game far better than I can here. I just hope this allows more people to understand why we rate World At War so highly compared to Modern Warfare 1942 I mean Vanguard.
@@c0rruption775 Chill mate the last line was a joke. But at least World at War added to what COD 4 did in its multiplayer and improved it. Campaign wise they’re very different and obviously you have Zombies.
Sounds: WaW. Although Vanguard has better sounds on some weapons, the muffled metal sounds on the guns and that MG42 gunshots just kills me. Animations: Vanguard, you know why i chose this. *Tac reloads are still questionable lmfao* Models: Both models has a look of "War-Torn", so i'd say they're looking great. (I'm aware the graphics are VERY different, but still.) Conclusion: its a tie, although Vanguard might have a fun gameplay and all, WaW will always be one of the best, if not THE BEST CoD.
@UCEzldgXAUHliUkeNnBL7--A the story and operators are not realistic and believable atleast how the story portrays itself, some operators are just plain dumb
1:06 I gotta say how I love the db animation in vanguard. As he ejects the shells he cocks one hammer, re adjusts his hand to do the other as he loads the new shells in
It just feels kinda weird seeing these ‘tactical’ reloads for a supposed WW2 game in Vanguard. I’ll always prefer the Workd at War reloads and weapons.
@@bedebop3904 no, it really doesn’t, it makes it even more confusing actually. Tactical things were not even around until the late 89s or mid 90s even then wasnt really adopted Uninspired boring NPC like MCs dont seem to function enough to actually work like that.
@@cheezyballz personally I feel that vanguard animations are too tacticool esc. WAW guns feel rugged and like actual guns, a complaint I have for a lot of cod is that a lot of guns feel weightless and like toys. WAW fixes this imo by excellent sound design and animations that reinforce it.
@@AustinCDennisyeah put most of the guns in all cod games don’t sound like real guns and the reason is because most of the sounds are simulated or the real shots are edited
Animations: CoD Vanguard for obvious reasons. Models: Both of them have good models for their respective time period. Sounds: CoD WaW. Winner: CoD WaW. Since it is way better than Vanguard in all aspects.
If you mean in vanguard, yeah. If you mean irl? Hell no. This is actually one of the things WaW got spot on. The general cycling sounds on the bolt action rifles in WaW are ALMOST a dated 1 to 1 on the real guns, save for the distinct "cling" you would hear as the empty shell is popped out on a real gun.
sometimes WaW feels more, believable ig? The reloads arent to tactically perfect that it makes it more realistic, like the way the solider fumbles with the mag with the SVT or how he shakes the mag out of the G-43
i miss the good ol days where you don’t hold the mp40 by the side when it was holding it by the mag people crap talk cod ww2 but at least the weapon holding looks cool btw if you dislike cod ww2 no offense i love that game with its flaws and all
8:17 the devs have never reloaded an actual mosin via a stripper clip and it shows lmao. “Hell let loose” absolutely nails the sound and reload animations
Just a little jab at Vanguard, even after all this time, because I can. I did some digging, and I found these WW2 handgun training videos, I believe around eight to eleven years ago. They explained and showed that soldiers were taught how to fire handguns with one hand, mainly so that the other could carry something important, like a knife, or documents. It's annoying that Vanguard not only has soldiers holding it with *two* hands, but they do..*tactical reloads?* I'm sure that wasn't a thing back in 1942, at least, not that I know of. Do correct me if tactical loading was a thing back then. It just looks odd in that time period. Though, Vanguard and WAW against each other? That's like pitting a Volkswagen against a Ferrari. We all know who'll win, by a long-shot. I care not for graphics, especially when the story is raw, unfiltered, and wasn't afraid of the big bold Swastika. Vanguard, on the other hand, is the watered down version, diluted to such a point, it's hard to tell what it was originally supposed to be. WAW- Real warfare, gritty and raw experience, fearless in approach and execution. Vanguard- Mangles historic records beyond belief, makes an absolute mockery out of what soldiers went through. Unrealistic events and highly plausible story elements. Predictable characters and incorrectly made main characters, based off of real folks. *Kingsley should not be Cameroonian, for there was no sort of fighter of that stature. Why is he a rich college boy joining the war front?*
I highly doubt soldiers back then were taught the “tacticool” partial mag swap seen on the vanguard 1911. Hell, they were taught to shoot them one handed.
If you think New games are better than old games. You’re also considering MW2019 an old game and Vanguard a new game since MW2019 is now older than Vanguard. I’m gonna wear my nostalgia glasses on.
I still think it was a big mistake to give vanguard weapons the tactical reloads that Modern Warfare 2019 had because soldiers during the WW1/WW2 era did not do these reloads at the time, but then again: It's call of duty. It's not supposed to be 100% spot on historically accurate
Anyone else noticed that the m1928 in vangaurd doesnt have a charging handle on the side he just throws away the empty drum and puts one in without charging?;?!
@@-Myzz- dude Sometimes the Thompson doesn't get the bolt locked when the last round is shot Or basically, if you just tap any open bolt weapon on the last round the bolt wouldn't close
@@-Myzz- it’s because the Thompson is an open bolt meaning that the bolt is Locked open so that’s why he doesn’t pull the charging handle for a new mag.Also the Thompson in vanguard is a mix of a m1928 and a m1a1
WaW is an obvious nostalgia win, but now as I hear the BAR reload after a long hiatus, it sounds less like turds and more like taking a turd, specifically when the magazine is removed
I give props for vanguard at its clean graphics and cool animations but the game was literally a dumpster fire(not even gonna get into why) and honestly I’d rather play WW2 than this again since it’s more playable, but WAW is a gem to say the least
One thing about waw that you people over look is that the guns in waw look used and abused but newer world war shooters like vanguard give a brand new gun off the factory line
My opinion but I hate the sound effects in vanguard when they reload. It all sounds the same with that metal sound. It sounds like lego bricks moving around or something 😂
Vanguard has amazing graphics, World at War has amazing gameplay and a much more grittier better atmosphere for portraying the real horrors of war so it’s clear which one id rather play.
Idk I think vanguard also has great gameplay
World at war is way more darker than Vanguard
Vanguard is trash :/
Vanguard has better graphics and gameplay. The only thing WaW gets more correct is the dark atmosphere.
@@Хаха-к5ф k
Just realized the hammer on the combat shotgun for vanguard is up and down at the same time when shot
Duplicated hammer mesh
lmao💀
@Th3Burn3dM4n yeah, the rigging bugged
And so is the weapon model
From what I can tell, the glitch is fixed if you equip something to the underbarrel region. Here’s hoping they fix it soon without relying on that lol
What the fuck are you guys talking about, that’s how a shot gun works
I will be honest.
WaW doesnt have skins for weapons so it beats vanguard.
I agree
Who give a crap about those skins it ain't fortnite
@@Noname-kw2hq Cringe skins are the cancer of gaming society.
Yes
weapon camos?
I always loved in WaW how the bolt locked back on the STG-44 even though that was not normal or realistic whatsoever. It's such a good animation.
The sound doe 😻😻
Still bugs me that in vanguard you hold the thompson like a Ppsh 41.
Thats just how you held a drum mag back then.
@@blurbledurblechurble Except this model doesn't use a drum mag
@@chevettecromado except who cares, its a video game not a documentary.
@@blurbledurblechurble it's ugly but at least it's the a1 version and not the m1928
Spy gaming
I prefer vanguard in terms of graphics and some animation
But i prefer WAW in terms of everything
it has soul and realism to it unlike vanguard
Just look at ppsh in vanguard 4:06 its a prime example of weapons its just lifeless dosent feel like a real weapon at all now look at at WAW one, its literally scratches your ears
I mean, Vanguard pretty much is a WW2 skinned MW19....
In terms of sound, sure, but vanguard’s is simply better at everything else imo
@@fifteen8850 no
@@wiktornowicki8118 lol ok brah
I loved that sound. Missed actual gun sounds. All we have now is tin cans.
Vanguard has better graphics and animations. But it will never beat the legend of WAW.
True even COD2,COD UO,WaW player me who liked Vanguard's Campaign it was a serviceable good WW2 Campaign.
But ain't COD 2 or WaW it's just a Hybrid of WW2,WaW and COD 2.Its a 7/10 not 9/10 experience like COD 2 or WaW
Its like comparing a Diamond with rusted iron
WAW has its problems but both are doing their own things, Vanguard isnt trying to beat WAW and its got a totally different tone
@@ChandranPrema123 Dude, I just replayed COD 2. Still holds up today
For a second I thought you were gonna hate on waw
Cod vanguard & WW2: save zussman, the time that he/ she did that
COD WAW: HORRIFIC WAR
When the fuck is zussman in the game
@@CoreRealm Because he's very "Zussman"
@@CoreRealm He said WW2, not just Vanguard.
I’d honestly rather play WW2 than Vanguard cuz atleast WW2 didn’t fucking rewrite history
@@unlondonbobby3336 true. Ww2 had a cliched story, but at least it wasn’t horrible like vanguard’s where the diverse super soldiers talk about their past while in a cell.
World at War with modernized animations and MW2019's graphics, would easily beat Vanguard.
every infinity ward games will destroy this crap
oh yeah btw i know WaW is treyarch but yk
@@Ajay-dy3xw 1. Activision wouldn't let them
2. developer conflict and disagreement on certain decisions
3. Activision would let them
4. Activision being Activision
@@Ajay-dy3xw activison want a cod every year
@@Ajay-dy3xw treyarch ran out of ideas
WaW's animations are basically from the 1st installment, but particularly improved for WaW, except some weapons:
M1897 from 2nd(3rd) installment for the reload, their fire animation
StG44's Empty reload
Garand's Mid-reload
1911 Animations are from COD 1 but slightly better
That M1897 reload is from COD 3 but better
@@ChandranPrema123 no,WAW M1897 is still from COD2. In COD3 the character facing the shotty upward,pump at the 5th shell and insert an extra 6th shell so it can be 5+1. And tbh,it is more proper in COD3 rather than in WaW or COD2 because the mag tube can only contains 5 shells
Most of WAW animations were recycled from COD1-3
11:01 I respect how classic WaW has become, but man, that reload animation hurts my soul.
god it sure does
Ouch
Same level of cursed like that one old counter strike m4 animation lol
@@fifteen8850 lmao
Not to mention the mg42 spits out the links that looks like they came from a .50
World at War is its own game meanwhile Vanguard is just a DLC being pushed for Warzone.
World at War is its own games? Pfft that game felt like CoD4 but in a world war 2 setting (besides zombies)
@@playerslayer6923 sounds like a cope but ok
@@playerslayer6923 it did not feel like cod 4 at all. The atmospheer, the shittier guns (in a good, authentic ww2 sorta way) and just the overall feel of the game was what made it its own game.
@@vermark8719 he's literally right lmao
@@no-du1qn rugged shity...
2:40 After many years, I just realized that the character misses the mag. A realistic detail for a old game.
that’s what i loved about mw2019, the operator misses the magwell on the first try, it’s a small touch that adds so much character. just look at the fennec reload.
There is love behind World At War, and greed behind Vanguard.
I love for the DD shotgun in Vanguard, the character doesnt even hold the second live shell in place. Activision...if your reading this, which im highly doubting..if you've established something before, its best to keep it going.
1:41 where did that shell come from ?
The shadow realm
Magic
He didn't pump it after he empty the gun so there is a spent round in the chamber
@@Govrin. but can you see the window from where that was ejected ?
@@JoaoVictor-vd9fn Hello, another Brazilian that likes watching foreign content like me! Welcome to the club
Im enjoying Vanguard but World at war Will Always be My fav COD
See some people unfairly complaining about those being “nostalgic” for World At War so I want to add this. World At War, despite its flaws, will remain an overall better game than Vanguard. The former is a game, a properly good COD. The other is merchandise.
Some reload animations are wrong in World At War, such as the bolt-action rifles using a full stripper clip regardless if there’s still rounds in the magazine. Or the ejecting shotgun shell for the Double Barrel after firing.
Its sound and graphics quality have also aged a fair bit. But by 2007/08 standards the animations, sounds and graphics were pretty good for their time, and even today the sound design and look/feel of World At War remains rememberable and iconic. Any COD Veteran will freak out if they hear another MP40 knowing that MP40 user is running Juggernaut. Or the soundtrack. The music in this game is amazing.
Obviously Vanguard has better graphics and sound quality but overall sound design? No. Music? God no. Inaccurate weapon design, reload animations and other such things? Vanguard has way more, even accounting for it having more weapons. You should expect a newer game to be better than its predecessors in all aspects, and fancy graphics only get you so far.
I highly recommend The Act Man’s video on World At War because he explains why it’s a great game far better than I can here. I just hope this allows more people to understand why we rate World At War so highly compared to Modern Warfare 1942 I mean Vanguard.
True
Very well said.
Ok jeez
If that's the case, why don't we call WAW "Cod 4, 1942"? You are so delusional
@@c0rruption775 Chill mate the last line was a joke. But at least World at War added to what COD 4 did in its multiplayer and improved it. Campaign wise they’re very different and obviously you have Zombies.
4:30 still ppsh is the beast compared with vanguard vers also cod waw weapons are sounds so clunky metals compared with vanguard version
That 1911 WAW reloud sound is a certified hood classic
Sounds: WaW. Although Vanguard has better sounds on some weapons, the muffled metal sounds on the guns and that MG42 gunshots just kills me.
Animations: Vanguard, you know why i chose this. *Tac reloads are still questionable lmfao*
Models: Both models has a look of "War-Torn", so i'd say they're looking great. (I'm aware the graphics are VERY different, but still.)
Conclusion: its a tie, although Vanguard might have a fun gameplay and all, WaW will always be one of the best, if not THE BEST CoD.
@UCEzldgXAUHliUkeNnBL7--A the story and operators are not realistic and believable atleast how the story portrays itself, some operators are just plain dumb
cod 4 is the best cod ever made
its either waw or mw2
WaW was the last successor to the OG cod experience mixed with cod4
@@AlessandroVillarrealFiestas mw2. Bo.bo2.mw3
1:06 I gotta say how I love the db animation in vanguard. As he ejects the shells he cocks one hammer, re adjusts his hand to do the other as he loads the new shells in
It just feels kinda weird seeing these ‘tactical’ reloads for a supposed WW2 game in Vanguard. I’ll always prefer the Workd at War reloads and weapons.
Btw those tactical reloads don't really go with a WW2 game. I don't even talk about the way he holds the weapons.
Atleast i would have been fine if it was in MP only but even in Campaign?
Why why Even MW 2019 didn't have Tac Sprint in Campaign
Hey, haven't you seen yourself in the definitive edition?
The operators in vanguard are supposed to be the people who invented the tactical style, so it fits well.
@@bedebop3904 still feels out of place
@@bedebop3904 no, it really doesn’t, it makes it even more confusing actually.
Tactical things were not even around until the late 89s or mid 90s even then wasnt really adopted
Uninspired boring NPC like MCs dont seem to function enough to actually work like that.
Nothing beats that WAW PPSH
The sound just so satisfied
In WaW, Double-Barreled Shotgun eject's a bullet from the side off the barrel... wtf
Minor mistake... But the vanguard gunsmith is isnt just a mistake...
Its a bug that the devs never fixed because they were already focused on black ops 1
@@dietzel8988 oh from that gunsmith, i need to puke
Poor Stg44
imagine cod vanguard with waw sounds and atmostphere and cod waw with vanguard anims and graphics
Fuck the vanguard animations
That point just remaster WAW
You mean just a WAW remaster😂
@@Jschaefer04 yes, that’d be better than the modern games made by incompetent ward, Treydark, and hammered on the job’s newer entries.
@@Krejii05 vanguard’s animations are awesome wdym
@@cheezyballz personally I feel that vanguard animations are too tacticool esc. WAW guns feel rugged and like actual guns, a complaint I have for a lot of cod is that a lot of guns feel weightless and like toys. WAW fixes this imo by excellent sound design and animations that reinforce it.
Also the type 100 in WAW actually sounds like a type 100. The things we take for granted.
Just looked up a video of it and nope, nothing like it at all. It's never sounded like a gun to me, same with the Thompson.
@@AustinCDennisyeah put most of the guns in all cod games don’t sound like real guns and the reason is because most of the sounds are simulated or the real shots are edited
Cod fan: we want tac reload in every other game
*put tac reload in ww2 game*
Cod fan: wait no
Vanguard: looks realistic
World at war: is realistic
yes.
neither of them are. Almost at all.
If they were they wouldn't even be sold.
WAW has a lot of flaws with the animations as well tho lmao
WaW is not quite realistic, remember that King Tigers in Stalingrad.
RIP to everyone on that warship in the distance.
1:23 wtf ejected shell?
Big bruh moment
Likely an error caused using the M1897’s animation as a basis when they were designing the Double Barrel in-game and forgot to correct it afterwards.
The classic glitch
It's a glitch
“Wake up my friend, you always survive” what a good game
makes me wish we a got a sound pack for vanguard that replaces the gun sounds with the ones from world at war
2000 cp for ya
Don't mind me, people. I just came here to enjoy watching this.
Animations: CoD Vanguard for obvious reasons.
Models: Both of them have good models for their respective time period.
Sounds: CoD WaW.
Winner: CoD WaW. Since it is way better than Vanguard in all aspects.
Models are great, but WaW wins when it comes to the correct models, for some of the guns, that were actually used in the war.
@@Nottagilla Well the animations in WaW are half good while the other half have some incorrect reloads and maybe some animations
This guy: CoD Vanguard wins in animations aspect
Also this guy: CoD WaW wins because it's better than CoD Vanguard in every aspect
@@03cristopher36 Matter fact, I meant "aspects" as gameplay and other stuff.
@@Hopy Animations is also an aspect
Please atleast specify which aspects and not just immediately saying "every aspect"
I've always loved the WaW double barrel. It sounds like God slamming the car door.
Remember when the Guy who wanted to shoot you With It missed the shot and i landed on the wall? God that was scarry
all the vanguard guns had the some shoot sounds
I gotta be honest here. In Bolt-Action Rifles, the cycling sound is "IDENTICAL"!
If you mean in vanguard, yeah. If you mean irl? Hell no.
This is actually one of the things WaW got spot on. The general cycling sounds on the bolt action rifles in WaW are ALMOST a dated 1 to 1 on the real guns, save for the distinct "cling" you would hear as the empty shell is popped out on a real gun.
ngl I like WAW's sound effects more than Vanguard's
it seems to me like vanguard is going for a "thumpy" noise with its guns and world at war had more of a "bark" sound
Just realized that the double barrel shotgun in WaW ejects a casing when you ADS it
The world at War ppsh will always be the cooler older brother of all the SMGs.
Tompson With drum Mag: Daniel
PPSh-41 With drum Mag: The Cooler Daniel
sometimes I wonder why they don't remaster WaW
Dont worry, we all wonder about that.
if they remaster the game they fear that they cant the atmostphere and dark gritty theme of the game
@@steveman0420 C'mon, MWR and MW2R is better than the original. I'm sure they can do that with WaW.
@@Ajay-dy3xw im sure no one had that on plan yet
@@Ajay-dy3xw ehem, sjw exists
Oh boy ive been waiting for this one
I like how the majority agrees of Vanguard looking good, but nothing else.
sometimes WaW feels more, believable ig? The reloads arent to tactically perfect that it makes it more realistic, like the way the solider fumbles with the mag with the SVT or how he shakes the mag out of the G-43
"Dimitri! Fire the Panzerschreck!"
This proves that a 2008 game was far more historical accuracy than a 2021 game
i miss the good ol days where you don’t hold the mp40 by the side when it was holding it by the mag
people crap talk cod ww2 but at least the weapon holding looks cool
btw if you dislike cod ww2 no offense i love that game with its flaws and all
You hold it by the mag well not the mag
1:23 the shotgun expulses a case
When I played WaW back in 2018, the game looks awesome.
Is it 2008?
@@alanproch yes
Too bad it’s infested with modders nowadays
8:17 the devs have never reloaded an actual mosin via a stripper clip and it shows lmao. “Hell let loose” absolutely nails the sound and reload animations
Vanguard:someone bugger that rpg
WAW:PANZERSCHRECK!
"Panzerfaust can be reload like RPG". what a accurate history bruh 😒
@@Sulaga-b8n IKR panzerfaust is the first disposable rocket launcher and then this
Why is the 1911 so small in Vang?
It's because he's holding it very far with your arms fully stretched.
What the two guys above said
I'm more concerned that the sights are so wide
Dang the pov is high in the Vang so i will hang
Why do all the vanguard guns sound like helicopters
Just a little jab at Vanguard, even after all this time, because I can.
I did some digging, and I found these WW2 handgun training videos, I believe around eight to eleven years ago. They explained and showed that soldiers were taught how to fire handguns with one hand, mainly so that the other could carry something important, like a knife, or documents.
It's annoying that Vanguard not only has soldiers holding it with *two* hands, but they do..*tactical reloads?* I'm sure that wasn't a thing back in 1942, at least, not that I know of. Do correct me if tactical loading was a thing back then. It just looks odd in that time period.
Though, Vanguard and WAW against each other? That's like pitting a Volkswagen against a Ferrari. We all know who'll win, by a long-shot. I care not for graphics, especially when the story is raw, unfiltered, and wasn't afraid of the big bold Swastika. Vanguard, on the other hand, is the watered down version, diluted to such a point, it's hard to tell what it was originally supposed to be.
WAW- Real warfare, gritty and raw experience, fearless in approach and execution.
Vanguard- Mangles historic records beyond belief, makes an absolute mockery out of what soldiers went through. Unrealistic events and highly plausible story elements. Predictable characters and incorrectly made main characters, based off of real folks. *Kingsley should not be Cameroonian, for there was no sort of fighter of that stature. Why is he a rich college boy joining the war front?*
I remember fondly My Team using the Combat Shotgun to defeat the Enemy Team.
The C clamp MP-40 still haunts me to this day.
Waw with modern cod graphics would be lit.
You could use those M1 Garand apertures as basketball goals. Geez
I highly doubt soldiers back then were taught the “tacticool” partial mag swap seen on the vanguard 1911. Hell, they were taught to shoot them one handed.
Credit where credit is due, that MG42 in Vanguard gives me the shivers
i love how world at war’s “double-barrelled shotgun” ejects a shell when shot.
Almost every new cod game since 2019 makes the pistols look so god damn small.
In these videos, I'm always here for MG42.
I just got a COD Vanguard AD on this video
*drum mag garand intensifies*
lmao
@@Ajay-dy3xw "...But I'm sure that they didn't use a FUCKING DRUM MAGAZINE." -M4sked
@@Ajay-dy3xw magazine on a revolving gun
More likely: a Game Vs a Fast and Easy Cash grab
If you think New games are better than old games. You’re also considering MW2019 an old game and Vanguard a new game since MW2019 is now older than Vanguard. I’m gonna wear my nostalgia glasses on.
I still think it was a big mistake to give vanguard weapons the tactical reloads that Modern Warfare 2019 had because soldiers during the WW1/WW2 era did not do these reloads at the time, but then again: It's call of duty. It's not supposed to be 100% spot on historically accurate
I’m honestly just tired of seeing tactical reloads in every game nowadays.
Did anyone else notice the shell coming out of the world at war double barrel?
WaW: a more gritty and realistic depiction of ww2
Vanguard: basically an arcade game based in ww2
I think we can all agree that the PPSH 41 in waw sounds and looks cooler than the In vanguard.
Yep vanguard guns are again sounds so poopy
What I just heard was that the MP40 has the same reload sound as some SMGs in Black Ops 2
Vanguard has the best soinding m1 garand ever put in an fps
i have many good memories with world at war m1911 reload sound
3:00 its weird how in vanguard they don’t charge the gun after emptying a mag but in world at war it does. Weird.
Ones a stick reload the other is a drum mag reload
@@VitoScaletta1951 you still need to charge it to put a round in the chamber
@@VitoScaletta1951 never mind
It doesn't even have a bolt
@Random steel it can also be in the side
Anyone else noticed that the m1928 in vangaurd doesnt have a charging handle on the side he just throws away the empty drum and puts one in without charging?;?!
Yeah but didn't tommy gun have that feature where you don't.
@@ChandranPrema123 no all Tommy's that were issued in the war handle had a charging handle on top the side
@@-Myzz- dude
Sometimes the Thompson doesn't get the bolt locked when the last round is shot
Or basically, if you just tap any open bolt weapon on the last round the bolt wouldn't close
@@CoreRealm but in the video the vangaurd thompson is emptied and then inserted with an new mag
@@-Myzz- it’s because the Thompson is an open bolt meaning that the bolt is Locked open so that’s why he doesn’t pull the charging handle for a new mag.Also the Thompson in vanguard is a mix of a m1928 and a m1a1
Ah the classic world at war I loved it best sound design on the weapons especially the ppsh41 and the classic mp40
the garand details
IT ACTUALLY PRESS THE MAGAZINE RELEASE WHEN YOU RELOAD THE NON SPENT CLIP
Oooooooooo the 1911 shot sound in WAW is glorious
i saw on the double barrel on the world at war game that a rifle round ejects out the double barrel, a little strange.
I don't know if I'm the only one who noticed something wrong with the double barrel
Some of sounds in WAW were actually taken from COD 3
What i can't understand is the disintegrating ammo belt on the mg42 in most ww2 fps...
World At War = OG COD
Vanguard = Modern COD
Yo dude thx for being more realistic than Vanguard and understanding the BAR is a lmg
Animations aside WaW is the superior game overall
Anyone notice that when you shoot a pistol in Vanguard, the hammer doesn’t move?
Bruh... Imagine missing this detail from a 14 Year Old game.
@@white2765 I blame Activision for this
You made it to 100 million views :D
The fictional names on a real guns wants me to gouge my eyes.
What did tokarev's ghost come and issue a cease and desist?
WaW is an obvious nostalgia win, but now as I hear the BAR reload after a long hiatus, it sounds less like turds and more like taking a turd, specifically when the magazine is removed
wait did i just see a shell fall out on the waw double barrel while ads?
No one is talking about How a regular Soldier can reload the DP-27/28 a.k.a The Pan Gun Faster tham a Hyper Trained Specialist?
Is the bar in both games a good depiction with reload?
I give props for vanguard at its clean graphics and cool animations but the game was literally a dumpster fire(not even gonna get into why) and honestly I’d rather play WW2 than this again since it’s more playable, but WAW is a gem to say the least
People are angry because the mosin reloads like the kar98, but the waw mosin reloads the same like the vanguard version
One thing about waw that you people over look is that the guns in waw look used and abused but newer world war shooters like vanguard give a brand new gun off the factory line
My opinion but I hate the sound effects in vanguard when they reload. It all sounds the same with that metal sound. It sounds like lego bricks moving around or something 😂
find it abit weird that an old game like WaW has a more accurate M1 Garand reload (not empty) than the newer game vanguard.