I don’t think he/she had any part in how much they used it in the video... they probably commissioned someone to do it and I bet it was expensive so they decided to maximise the use of the animation to get its value worth.
Just small details that’s all 😂 Yeah no way Egyptians built these. Plus I read they meant to be some sort of cooling system, according to all the tunnels etc.
It is quite common knowledge that Khufu was NEVER interned in that Pyramid or EVER lay in the granite box. No One knows when the pyramid was built. All that this video shows is pure speculation.
The first builders of the pyramids were at the end of the second dynasty. They knew the technique of building pyramids, and pyramids such as Saqqara, the Amphitheater, Meidum, and the Red Pyramid were previous experiences.
I watched a separate vid about the pyramids and it stated how even the measurements of this structure is so advance of its time and how it has hidden purpose to locate things in the sky. And now i'm even more amazed by how it's built inside.. the intricate design of its interior and each and every single corner has a purpose of its own. 😮 how astonishing
And in 40 years he never realized there was no mummy or treasure ever found there, even though it was sealed when originally found? And I kind of feel like those narrow tunnels wouldn't have been very practical for getting all that treasure in or out. And Occam's Razor would say that starting with an arbitrary timeline and trying to invent building techniques to make the timeline plausible is a lot of mental gymnastics when a more likely explanation would be that Kufu didn't build it and it's probably a lot older than they say.
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
Not to mention that unlike the Valley of the Kings or other ancient Egyptian burial tombs, there are NO hieroglyphs inscribed on the inner walls of the Giza pyramids. They're just blank. Very unusual for the Egyptians who covered everything in inscriptions.
The title of this video is "How Did The Ancient Egyptians Cut The Granite Blocks To Build The Pyramids" but we only see limestones being carved. This is misleading. How did they cut 70 - 100 tons of "granite" (not limestone) and move it above the chambers in many of the pyramids?
New Discoveries at Wadi al-Jarf ruclips.net/video/FB9xT2aWXSY/видео.html The Port, the Papyrus, and the Great Pyramid ruclips.net/video/VMOqCobDEc4/видео.html Diary Of A Pyramid Labourer // Oldest Papyrus Discovered 2550 BC "Diary of Merer" ruclips.net/video/UyQpxzbL_BM/видео.html
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
Exactly. These kind of documentaries produced by major networks like History Channel or Discovery are such trash. They always invent these narratives that involve a lot of imaginative conjecture like how they just assume Kufu set the timetable and "is hopeful" the project goes well. What hieroglyph or papyrus scroll are they reading that edict or diary entry from, exactly? And not only did they not answer the original question about granite as you said, but they even showed how exceedingly impractical it was to cut limestone with steel tools and even admitted that it would be almost impossible within the completely arbitrary timetable.
The Samarian Tablets discussed the Pyramids thousands of years prior to the birth of Kufu. There is an Pyramid agenda to keep the Egyptian narrative going at all costs when in fact, these great pyramids were built approximately 10,000 years earlier, ....LONG before the reign of the Egyptians. The Sphinx has deep water grooves along it's base which strongly supports this time line. This article discusses TRUTH regarding history which is always kept secret because the Elite Cabal possess some of the ancient knowledge unknown to most regarding ancient aliens, free energy (which was produced by the Pyramid), healing, levitation and plasma based energy required for dimentional space travel. Some of all that stuff is disclosed below in the linked article, and some of this material will be further disclosed to us (the masses) later this year when the Central Banking System collapses, the Cabal falls, and many of the ELITE are rounded up for prosecution related to the Covid-19 scandal and Crimes Against Humanity! Free Energy, Space travel,, Alien presence, and GOD as we know him are definitely going to be known by all at some point this year as this great global Cabal EVIL is exterminated! alien-ufo-sightings.com/2015/10/the-10th-sumerian-tablet-the-anunnaki-built-the-pyramids/
Watching this video leaves you with more questions than answers. 40 years of research and gained the knowledge equivalent to what is taught in high school
@@ScreamingEagleFTW According to modern engineers the pyramids could not be built with state of the art equipment let alone copper tools. And no records whatsoever on how they were built.
@@ScreamingEagleFTW Maybe you could show in detail just how easy you make it sound. I've spent years reading theories on how the pyramids were built and for every proposal there's a dozen reasons why it wouldn't work. Seriously I would love to see your proposal and I'm sure the engineering community would too.
It's rational to conclude that if we can't do it now we couldn't do it thousands of years ago with no technology. UFO's are now officially recognised by world governments so why not alien technology? Atlantis and previous technologically advanced civilisations cannot be dismissed. Both possibilities seem more plausible than ancient Egyptians who hadn't even invented the wheel.
What gets me is that the Egyptians were meticulous about recording literally everything they did. Their everyday lives even down to monotonous tasks is highly documented and yet, not one piece of information of how they built the pyramids.
*no one knows for sure. There are plenty of theories. A great many of them don't require aliens or ridiculous 'ancient high technology' prattle as so many armchair archeologists on RUclips make constant talk of for fun, but far more often for profit.
"There's a sucker born every minute" was a saying in the 19th century about P.T Barnum being able to trick people into believing in nonsensical things like the ‘Fiji mermaid,” “The Cardiff Giant” the “161 year old nursemaid” and many other hoaxes designed to earn an income from. The ability continues into the internet age and the fantastical stories & videos on RUclips about “lost civilizations,” “unexplainable mysteries” and “ancient high technology" put out by profit seeking book authors like Graham Hancock, Brien Foerster, UnchartedX, Randall Carlson and others like them are the proof.
@@davidleomorley889 Appreciate the links but im not sure what it has to do with this video and my comment? The fire technique is interesting but granite cracks are not flat like slate and would still require a very long time and impressive technology to get the faces as flat and smooth as those found in Giza for example.
@@Orangebery You: "The fire technique is interesting but granite cracks are not flat like slate and would still require a very long time and impressive technology to get the faces as flat and smooth as those found in Giza for example." Me: They had "a very long time" because quarrying, moving, cutting and shaping stone was their job. The pharaoh required it to be done...and so they found a way. Experimental archeology has shown that cutting and drilling accurately into granite can happen using simple copper tools in conjunction with an abrasive made of a harder stone and water. Many people want it to be "impossible" because it's fun to believe it was impossible. Solutions and experiments that show how it was likely done are dismissed by the victims of RUclips pseudoscience because they don't want answers....they want the mystery to remain...because the mystery is what attracts them to the subject in the first place. ruclips.net/video/_fIigpabcz4/видео.html ruclips.net/video/g305wqCdPRs/видео.html ruclips.net/video/Mq2KGQajfAo/видео.html&feature=emb_logo
I love how that manipulative "expert" calls it a primitive machine lol. Those are not thombs by any means, but even if they are/where, they are anything but primitive.
@@noumanahmad86 I think the word he meant to use was simple, as in a simple machine. The wheel, winch, axle, pulley, lever, wedge and ramp (inclined plane) are the examples of simple machines. They allow you to do things using less effort at the cost of taking longer.
@@DragonX-dl6yo How do you know for sure? Besides, all images that I've seen that depict the construction of the pyramids always show the construction teams hauling blocks up ramps (inclined planes) using logs as rollers (axles, primitive or quasi‐wheels). I don't know if they ever used pulleys but I wouldn't rule it out entirely. They may have very well used wedges in the quarrying of and shaping stones too.
@@view1st Because the amount of rubbish mainstream archeology push on us to make sure it fits their narrative. For example, so many people were ridiculed when the theory of humans living in the Americas over 130,000 years ago was put forward ( graham hancock being one of those people ) but when the evidence was shown, they had no choice but to apologise. There has been no evidence left behind to prove the pyramids were built the way mainstream egyptologist suggest. Any stone mason or master builder will tell you it is impossible to cut granite or drill holes straight through with the tools that had been around at that time. This was not done by slaves. It was done by an advanced group of people at the peak of their skill. The pyramids were not built to house tombs either as no bodies have ever been recovered inside. Just like the majority of these ancient sites around the world that are built to align with certain celestial bodies in space, the pyramids were purposely built on true north and have a lot of encoded knowledge. There is SO MUCH missing in our story...
Things to remember: 1 - quarries do not typically cut stone "on demand". Quarries run in continuous operation and thus = they should have partially quarried blocks on hand at any given time. 2 - the Egyptian engineers would have known how much granite was required before the foundation of the pyramid was even laid out. 3 - so the quarry such as Aswan would have had literally years to quarry what granite was needed and transport it to Giza before it would need to be placed in the pyramid. 4 - what granite you see in Old Kingdom pyramids = basic shapes - typically blocks. 5 - so blocks could be obtained from the bedrock via dolerite pounders and fire. More precise cutting could be done using weighted copper saws and an abrasive such as sand or corundum. Polishing would be done via flat blocks and an abrasive. A sarcophagus could be cut using saws to obtain the exterior shape which is then polished smooth. The interior could be removed via chipping out using gneiss stone tools and/or possible copper tube drills to remove cores of stone. The inside would then be polished smooth the same as the exterior. Yes it is time consuming = but they had the time. Work on the sarcophagus which would have taken the longest time to fabricate likely began soon after Khufu assumed the throne - which is when work on a Pharaoh's tomb typically began. It then would have been placed in the King's Chamber before the walls went up much the same as a bathtub is installed in a room when it is wider than the door and the room constructed around it. Next to Khafre's valley temple adjacent the Sphinx was once a deepwater harbor. Merer's diary relates how during the months of the annual Nile flood is when stone from distant quarries would be transported to Giza via a system of canals and dikes they created to channel water to the harbor so as to allow heavily laden ships to access it. So granite and other basalts along with the white Tura limestone casing stones would be shipped in on barges to Giza during this time of high water each year.
@@MrAchile13 Force of habit I'm afraid as a consequence of a career spent in an applied science field. Thus I am compelled to evaluate all relevant evidence to ascertain plausibility as opposed to simply parroting claims often based upon ignorance of said evidence as you alluded to. Moral of the story: in so much as I enjoy history as a hobby for more than 40+ years I have tried to obtain an understanding of the evidence here. I then as noted apply critical thought to what they represents and what goes on relating to the same. For most simply understanding "what" happens is as far as they go. I prefer to try to understand "how" and "why" things occur so as to better understand the nature of a thing. Enjoy your day.
@@edelgyn2699 Yes = but the video deals with granite and not limestone - otherwise I would have addressed that as well. I am aware of Egyptian quarrying operations and the work of geo-archeologists such as Per Storemyr who study them.
The granite at the time it was acquired, was still malleable. Once it was fashioned into position, laid on a dry surface with the sun cooking it in extreme heat, the curing process would have happened within months. As this was happening, more internal stone could be 📐 set, built upon, added upon and smoothed out, as everything they were working with was soft and malleable. It being assembled in much smaller pieces, would have welded together, creating a finished product of great size. Never assume that what you are looking at today, was how it was at it's creation. Take for example a 100 year old wooden house. At the time it was built, the wood contained a lot of moisture and easiest to cut and shape, but today, it's dry as a sun bleached bone 🦴 and very hard to cut and shape. Firewood is another example, being green and full of moisture when cut, but seasoned and it's dry and ready to burn.
@@chhansen9813 This is correct. No matter your IQ, line of work or designation after your name it will NEVER equal the brain power of certain Egyptology "experts" and their assumptions. To even question a decree made by Hawas or Lehner is complete heresy. It is very surprising to me that the Egyptian Inquisition hasn't been launched to root out the naysayers and heretics and burn them all at the stake or tie them to a chair and toss them in the Nile to see if they sink or float?
No? Check out these guys cutting and drilling granite with copper blades and sand. ruclips.net/video/qeS5lrmyD74/видео.html Check out how to assemble blocks: ruclips.net/video/ZFEjBtPOPNk/видео.html
I used to buy into bright insights videos and all the conspiracy history theories. But there all crap, there is far far more evidence that the mainstream theories are correct. I actually felt a little duped but then i guess it was my own fault for believing them,.
@christian smith Ye they realy gonna build a pyramid like the great pyramid just for being a tomb. Makes no sense. Humans are not stupid. And like whole nature. Human certainly not gonna waste loads and loads of time and energy for something that need be finished before someone dies... with chances of being 0 it will be completed in time They just used the construction that was already there for their tombs. Now if you find a small grave underground. That might be created as tombs yes. Just explain why there isnt a single heiroglyph inside the giza pyramid. While every other burial place is full of them...
@christian smith Yes a tomb for all this they could not enter after closing... It makes no sense to do this and I understand what you try to say. But no it doesnt make sense. About evidence. Why is the giza pyramid the so called only tomb without a single hieroglyph on its inner walls. This should tell you more then enough!! Cause every other one has the opposite of nothing and is full with hieroglyphs. Also go see the small robot camera that went into the long tiny tunnel in the giza pyramid. It has markings inside. And no they are not hieroglyphs.
@@nawfsidebro58 🤦♂️ For one, slaves cost money; a lot of money when you own them in the thousands. Two, there is no evidence that slaves built the pyramids, but we do know that the workers who inhabited the area thousands of years ago were well fed and clothed. Three, there is no evidence that the Pyramids were built in that era, by those people. Four, your comment would have more credibility but taking at least some of that into consideration and would be even more convincing if you knew your your, you're and yore's.
@spidy9237 Though we have no evidence for the Pyramids being older than 5,000 BCE we do have some for the Sphinx. The water erosion marks on the Sphinx could have only formed 12,000 years ago… Remember Plato? He even said Atlantis fell to its destruction around 12,000 BCE… Plato even said that the tale of Atlantis was not a lie… even Gobekli Tepe was there around the same time period
@spidy9237 Lolll my mans thinks war didn’t exist m, how do you think nations get back years behind? Lol because of war. Lets not forget they found a calculator made out of BONES that traces back to ANCIENT egypt (kingdom of kush) now you tell me how they made that shiit?? Way back then? Comee on son
I believe that the entire Kings chamber and Grand Gallery were built with granite blocks weighing 80k+ lbs each with some being hoisted(or whatever) over 300ft off the ground and placed with pinpoint precision. You don't do that with ropes, pulleys, and manpower. There's something we don't know.
Do you guys know that they measured the feed rate of the drill used in the granite blocks by measuring the grooves? The feed rate whoever built them used was 500 times greater than what we can do today🤯Egyptians did not build them. They simply discovered them and used them as tombs.
0:22 One tries to suggest a relatively primitive processing of the contact surfaces of the Giza quarry limestone blocks by drawing with large gaps at the joints. Other drawings show an accuracy of the structure in the range of half a Millimeter. However, CAT drawings such as those made by Gantenbrink show the accuracy of the structure. Some take this picture of the outer walls which was destroyed by two thousands of years, of quarrig work on the site, as an example of the quality of the inner block structure. But if, as in the drawings shown here, there should only be a 5 mm gap between the stones, the number of blocks would result in settlements in the 10 meter range. The outer skin of the Tura limestone casing would have caused by settle movements of the structure crumble and fallen off by itself after a few hundred years.
"The Great Pyramid of Giza contains 2.3 million individual blocks of stone, meaning one block would have to be laid every five minutes of every hour, 24 hours a day, for the entire 20 years. The problem? Each block weighs at least 2 tons. That’s 1,764,000 pounds of stone being laid every day for 20 years." Explain this Discovery if you can
@Fist Bump Possibly the dumbest idea of all. Are you sure they didn't remove your own brain with sound frequency levitation in order to make you believe in that nonsense?
Do the maths add up? Mark Lehner is on record as saying that the pyramid was built in 85 years. If Kufu reigned for 36 years then how did he order the pyramid to be completed by his death? Also, let's look at the maths on a very simplistic level. First, we turn 85 years into minutes: 85 x 365 x 24 x 60 = 44,676,000 (being the number of minutes in 85 years). Then we divide those minutes by the number of stones placed within the structure. Many accept the number to be 2.3 million stones. Let's be generous, let's say 2 million. All we have to do now is divide the number of minutes in 85 years by the number of stones laid and we will get the time in minutes it took to lay the stones. 44,676,000 divided by 2,000,000 = 22.33. What this means is that the Egyptians, working on the model presented in this film, quarried, transported and installed a block of stone, some weighing 7 tons or more, every 22.3 minutes, 24 hours a day for 85 years. The film itself states at 08.05 that experts believe it would have taken the craftsmen half a day just to square the stone off. Half a day excluding the quarrying, transportation and installation. Let's bear in mind two other factors. 1. That we believe the blocks were transported on the Nile and that possibly can only happen when it is in flood. This means that transportation of blocks, which would have to go on day and night if we accept the thesis of this film, probably could not be conducted year-round but only in certain months. 2. These figures concerning the 2 million stones does not include the building of the infrastructure of the pyramid and nor does it include the extensive work done in preparing the foundations. If we accept the thesis of this film then we can start by multiplying the number of stones by 6 hours (half a working day): 2.3 million x 6 = 13,800,000. That is 13,800,000 hours just to shape the blocks by the film's own demonstration. Divide this by 24 gives us the number of days and divide by 365 gives us the number of years. 13,800,000 divide by 24 divide by 365 = 1575. That's one thousand, five hundred and seventy-five years just to shape the blocks. And let us remember that this film production is using steel tools for the task they can only complete in half a day. According to the same experts, the Egyptians only had copper tools which were weaker and much less effective than steel. The final assumption that a technique of rubble infill for the internal structure speeds up the build time cannot possibly be true because that infill is not counted in the 2 million stones used to construct the main architecture. The figures above still apply but you have to try and work out how much extra time they took creating the rubble infill. In that calculation, you also have to take into account that a lot of the internal structure is actually precisely fitted and built. If a degree level student in engineering tried to propose such an idea it is doubtful they would obtain any qualification. The real problem here is whether we can ask if this film represents a woeful lack of scholarship. All we are doing is looking at the numbers and I ask you whether you think they add up? I am not proposing any other theory about the pyramids, I am not suggesting any radical ideas, all I am saying is that if we do the maths then the whole premise of this film has to be questioned severely. But why is it that supposedly intelligent people are running with a theory which is so questionable? More worryingly, what on earth is going on in academia when archaeology faculties cannot question their own established histories and apply critical thinking?
@Rob Arthur Seriously Rob Arthur? Photographic evidence??? What about actually counting them? People have counted them and that's why Egyptologists recognise between 2.3 and 2.5 million stones as being the number in the pyramid. Even Wikipedia states: "The Great Pyramid was built by quarrying an estimated 2.3 million large blocks weighing 6 million tonnes in total." . I have to conclude that you do not know what you are talking about.
@@j.folder8276 Well that is an accolade I probably do not deserve. None of what I have said is original to myself, this is all a well known and well worn critique which is dismissed by archaeology departments around the world as a 'conspiracy theory'. Amazing really! I am a trained historian and do not deal in anything I can't prove or mount credible questions about. Yet I have been told that 'doing the maths' like this is a conspiracy theory. Why? Well I have my own perspective on this but it is little more than speculation. Undermining the received history about Egypt and the pyramids then brings into question a western civilisation model propagated for the last two hundred years in elite western universities. Nobody in the senior common room warming their feet by a log fire whilst sipping a brandy wants that sort of enquiry to stand ground. Better the history we teach than the history that is there in the bricks and mortar!
I have been inside the great pyramid. As a carpenter by trade, I placed my face against the wall and looked up the 45 degree tunnel. The perfection of the smooth, straight rock was amazing. The only word that came out of my mouth was - IMPOSSIBLE.
@@rafttherogue3692 It just really annoys that archaeologists will not hear the voices of engineering and trade professionals because, and this has been quoted to me, "...they are not trained archaeologists and therefore not qualified to talk about such things.". Being dismissed as 'conspiracy theorist' is also insulting. I am a trained and working historian. I was trained to evaluate sources, to grade information, to eschew propaganda and always, always, always to ask questions of my own conclusions. I am not suggesting computer controlled lathes, I am not suggesting alien architecture, all I am saying is that there is something wrong with the current interpretation. Something obviously wrong when you look at the engineering of buildings and artefacts. As you say, impossible!
@@mbrownie22 only reason I'm replying is the number 22 in your name, a number that follows me everywhere the date I was born my best friend was born, to much to list, then this random video I found which was produced yes you guessed it on my birthday 22nd August. ruclips.net/video/2fS9ixfQ_no/видео.html
@@blablabla6975 I understand, but take for example ''They were build 2500 BC'' . That's a blatant lie, could be true, but nobody knows. They arrived at that number by artifacts found in the surrounding area, which is flawed science. 0:25 ''Kufu hoped this colossal monument would preserve his mummie.....'' Who said it was build for a burial ? And no mummie has ever been found inside a pyramid, so another dumb assumption. Carving extremely precise granite or even harder materials with the tools from that time is simply impossible, even today's technologies will have big problems making such things. If those huge slabs above the 'king's chamber, are for preventing collapse because of the huge weight above it, then why is the 'queen's chamber only having one while being below the level of the former ? Another dumb assumption. Showing how to split a stone block with modern steel tools, o ok. Now try that with the copper chisels and hammer, see you in a few years. And these are just a few examples, but if you would dive in a bit deeper, by for example following the channel UnchartedX This is a nice video to start with : ruclips.net/video/6KUDu40BC5o/видео.html
This is kind of insulting. Exactly Zero bodies, coffins, intricate etched wall art or burial artifacts have ever been found at the great pyramid. Also, recent evidence suggests it was built way before 2500 BC.
The funny thing is, the pharaoh who its said to be responsible. Well there has only ever been one statue of him ever found and its about the size of your hand. why would a king who’s ego is so big, he built the largest building in the world for thousands of years, not have many many great statues? Why would there not be a record of this great project in hieroglyphs? Historians are still trying to fit everything into the last 10K years. But we know homo sapiens (as well as many other types of humans) have been around for hundreds of thousands of years. Their DNA is exactly the same as it is now, their intelligence or biological brain structure was the same as it is now. Another problem we have is; its Archeologists, Egyptologists and historians who make the final decision on how things where built/made instead of Stone masons and Architects. Its ludicrous and makes no sense.
@James Mcanish they were also known to graffiti the older Egyptians” work with their own hieroglyphs as well. Such as the granite boxes in the Serrapeum of Saccara and they vandalized the so called Sphinx. Of course these things are ignored when you want your name to live on forever in the history books.
@James Mcanish true and statues etc….. But the biggest laugh is when historians say that the Egyptians didn’t have the wheel. this for me is the most stupidest comment to come out of the history books. its like “oh yea? Then how did their cranes work?” How did they drill things etc
There's nothing more in this world that I'd like to know more than how the ancients cut, moved and placed megalith structures. Hope to know in my lifetime.
@@JR-ub2wt So, you were there, thousands of years ago when the pyramids were being built knowing the builders did not have knowledge of geopolymer technology? Just because something was rediscovered recently does not mean possible ancient advanced civilizations lacked these abilities as stated by Graham Hancock.
A few criticisms: 1) They are still pushing this narrative that it was a tomb. 2) As "Jeff" commented they never explained how the blocks were cut with copper tools when the men in the video didn't even cut one with modern tools. 3) It was sometimes hard to hear the narrative with the overpowering dramatic music and sound effects. 4) This is a regurgitation of the crap taught from history books 50 years ago.
5:35 those aren’t chiseled marks! The structure is 3500yrs old now and looking at the condition of the worlds climate, weathering will definitely take place. He’s saying it like they were chiseled last 2yrs lmaooo. Theirs pyramid were smoother than we think.
the structure is about 4500 years old. And the blocks he was pointing at was uncovorede about 200 years ago. The lower parts of the pyramids were covered over with sand. Its desert after all. So the marks actualy is 4500 years old. Also the stones hes pointing is inner srones that are roughly cut.
After watching the compelling cases of the ancient astronaut theories and pyramids all around the world- this conventional explanation sounds like cartoon stories for kids. If only there's a time machine, haha
more likely anchient humans had some form of advanced technology and were wiped out by a massive cataclysm. the younger dryas impact theory was a likely event. then stone age men found the ruins and occupied them
Fooling the kids, that is it. The problem only arises when you are in a society that is stuck on christianity and islam, like the west and middle east. Those theistic religions say the world was created 6600 BCE. That is the problem. In India, there would be no problem with pyramids and all that. They have books that go back 15.000 years.
7:15 This is the original meaning of the phrase “good tools is half the job”, because it used to take literally as much time to keep tools in good condition as doing the actual craft.
absolutely they were...they were around 5000 years...everyone ate well and was a skilled physician...beer and bread with every meal no matter your income...
@Toby Thompson you see bro, you need to provide evidence with your statements, otherwise you live in the very populated city of the trolls...and they are not sophisticated at all
The blocks weren’t chiselled they was cut with a circular saw! Anyone that things all those tunnels under Egypt were cut with a copper chisel are just being mugged off! There is also no evidence that there was ever a pharaoh in that pyramid. Where are the hieroglyphics on the walls and ceiling? don’t say weathering because they have survived in more open buildings close to the pyramid. It’s about time these false history narratives made up by people who wanted their names to live on in the history books are done away with now! Because the majority of intelligent people don’t buy it and won’t ever buy it! There is a lot more evidence that they are wrong!
@@andrefecteau What evidence do you have that they were all skilled physicians? That bullshit line of asking for evidence is more than a little hypocritical when making a statement like that. For certain they had a great cache of skilled stone workers, but physicians? Such a number of physicians would be completely unnecessary when a handful of them could serve dozens is not hundreds of workers each. Do try and use a little basic common sense before resorting to insulting people when you clearly can't even think for yourself with that kind of nonsense in your 'arguments'.
@@mnomadvfx hey Kenny go fuck yourself, I read it online in the history of Egypt...you are troll king ...you just post and talk shit...so once you get your head out of your ass maybe you'll see straight...no doctor needed
I wanted to see the twin towers and the pyramids, so lets hope the Egyptian govt doesnt fly planes into the pyramids and they get obliterated into a fine dust and fall at free fall speed!
What else could it be built for other than as a tomb? I don't believe that it is a tomb at all, but let's just call it a tomb for now until a much better answer comes up.
These videos are eye filling and I watch them just for that. Over my long life I heard many theories and I know by now that every young people like express his own theory. And I leave at that-just an opinion that every one has the right to express.
I would like to hear your opinion please? I've always thought the Pyramids were inherited by the Egyptians and they were built pre Flood as was the Sphinx.
@Rob Arthur If this were true it would have taken an inordinate amount of diamonds and the ability to crush them into consistently sized powder. This also does not explain how the vases were hollowed out, this would have to be fixed to one end of the "lathe". A wooden foot powered lathe could not have the speed accuracy or stability to do this.
Sacred geometry decoded channel just put out a video on making a granite ring with ancient techniques. I think he gets it down to 2mm thickness. It’s worth watching and only took him about a day to make.
They had 10 million or so sharp chisels a thousand or more slaves handing them to the stonecutters. That's a lot of copper man. They could excavate the ground and get billions of dollars in copper flakes,chips from those chisels 🤣
@@johnnylangford6952 so you believe that not only do you have 2.3 million stones that has to be quarried and carried miles to even get to the location, but you believe that added to that they had to make millions of chisels. And that slaves were skilled enough to pull of a modern marvel on the time frame they try to claim. Not only that but pyramids around the world just so happen to be built at the same time all out of coincidence..
I used to laugh at these things too. I was a fool to be duped by the conspiracy theory history videos. The reason i changed my mind is because there is no evidence at all for the conspiracies but then the mainstream has written texts explaining how they did it, they have found the tools and they have plans/drawings, bills of sale to quarries. Records of transportation. Also the pyramids are actually built in cemeteries and the ancient Egyptians even say what pyramids are for in texts. The pottery found in these pyramids all date to what the mainstream claim. So for sure the conspiracy videos are more interesting but unfortunately they are just fantasies to get us suckers to watch their videos for their own financial gain.
@@philwhatever3903 the problem is is that alot of the 'evidence' or claims made by mainstream academia either dont hold up to real world scrutiny, ignore/purposely dont address certain critical factors, and often dont actually even 'prove' what they claim they prove. The truth is is that we still dont know(and likely will never know) how, why, or even when some of these sites were constructed
@@Apeshaft Please explain how crude tools could drill into granite with a feed rate that we cannot match today. Please explain how 60-ton granite boxes could be hollowed out with sides exactly square and parallel, as measured by precision gauges, and the sides machined dead flat to .0002 of an inch. that's two ten thousandths, the precision of the gauge used. And inside corners with a radius equal to that of a common pencil. Give it your best shot.
@@salamanca1954 Time, manpower and the facts that people living back then were just as intelligent as we are today. And Babylonian and Sumerian mathematics that predates the Egyptian Empire were extremlly advanced. These people were no fools. Check out this short PDF: www.math.tamu.edu/~dallen/masters/egypt_babylon/babylon.pdf
@@Apeshaft Being highly intelligent is one thing, and manpower is another, but you cannot produce obviously machined works of high precision without machine tools, and advanced metrology, to measure the results, both of which are in abundant evidence in Egypt.
MISLEADING TITLE: They never talk about *how* the ancients cut granite blocks at all. They only discussed cutting limestone. I’d love to see them explain how they cut, shaped, and positioned 2.3 million granite blocks in 20 years. They would have had to place each block every 3 minutes for 20 years straight with no breaks 24/7 x 365.
The answer is simple; they didn't do that for 2.3 granite blocks because most of the blocks in the pyramid are limestone. Also not sure where this 3 Minute number comes from.. Not from. Doing the math on your stated numbers for sure.
@@Dundoril You're right... it's not every 3 minutes, it's placing a block every 4.5 minutes -- 24 hours a day -- 7 days a week 365 days a year for 20 years. 2.3 million limestone and grantite blocks perfectly placed every 270 seconds. Wow. Easy. Not to mention how easy it probably was to throw together the intricacy of the 20-70 ton granite blocks kings and queens chambers -- every 270 seconds. Also, the video still has a VERY MISLEADING TITLE: They never talk about how the ancients cut granite blocks at all. They only discussed cutting limestone. Your point is the math I did in my head was off by 90 seconds?
@@MANUALinappropriate yes my point was that even basic math is too much for you. My other point was that you claimed it was granite wenn it was in fact limestone for basically all but a few blocks compared to the whole building
@@Dundoril The VIDEO title claimed it was granite and it's misleading. Take it up with them. If being off by 90 seconds gets you real excited and erect, then maybe the title of the video claiming to be about how the ancients cut granite blocks should have you moist as well.
@@Dundoril Plus, granite or not, YOU CAN'T CUT, QUARRY, AND PERFECTLY PLACE 2.3 million giant fucking stone blocks every 270 seconds for 20 years straight. Literally impossible.
The only way to end all the speculation on how the Great Pyramid was constructed and reveal any hidden treasures is to actually take the pyramid completely apart, block by block
Difficult to even comprehend how the Architects / Engineers conceived the design of the pyramids with multiple chambers / passageways and calculate the load bearing factors involved.
No, its quite easy in fact, pyramid is the most primitive and stable achitecture form, nothing fancy like towers or domes where you need good grasp of how materials behave and where the load goes. Pyramid is just an organized pile of rocks, it literally cant get any simplier than that. This is the reason why this archeticture form is so widespread acros the globe.
To all the people that say egyptians built these structures 5000 years ago, please explain how such a sophisticated technology got simply lost in time. And while you do, remember that the Egyptians left no document on how they exactly built this megalithic structure. Let that sink in.
It got lost because it wasn't very practical except for building huge pyramids. Crazy expensive structure that serves no other purpose than calming the fears of a rich guy that he is going to die. And having no written trails is no wonder as well. After all it was 5000 years ago. Pyramids seem like a mistery to most of us, because we wrongly assume that most of human advance is done in the last 100 years. People 5000 years ago were as intelligent as we are now and had a great and rich civilisation, rich enough to afford to use tens of thousands of workers for decades to build a huge structure
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
@@johnp82 It's easy to believe that when Hollywood shows us aliens all the time (of which we'll never get first hand proof, it'll always be someone else who lives the experience, never you) or when academia tells us evolution as they believe it to be... Yes humans built them and yes, most secrets have been lost, but many were stolen and were used in modern civilizations as if brand new to us. In this day and age, it's almost impossible to tell people the reality of things since they've heard too many different conflicting theories... and online, everyone is an expert and right in their minds lol. Humans built those, but money can better be generated with an unsolved enigma so no "authority will come forward" and the money will keep rolling in the coffers ;) - this ain't news in the elite circles
@@winter_equinox1492 then explain how these humans from almost 5000 years ago moved millions of stone blocks weighing 2.5 TONS each, 481 feet in the air. That would be an incredible feat in 2022 with modern engineering and technology.
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
If Khufu built the pyramid,why was the only sign found with his name was on a repaired part? Why was it repaired if it was just built? Being it was in the Kings chamber you would think it would be perfect.
They say the pyramid took 30 years to build. It would have taken them 30 years to cut one granite block in the kings chamber with the tools they had. Makes no sense.
@@scottjohnstone5551 and theres never been a single huge arsenical copper saw found, there’s absolutely no tools ever found capable of doing it. Anyone that argued they know how it was done is lying, unless theyre an elite and you offer them a child to sacrifice or something for the knowledge
It's no coincidence that everyone who claims humans made the pyramids are also unfamiliar with all the 30 or so reasons for why we could not have if the version of history we've been taught is correct. They usually just know a few of them, such as the size and precision. Those aren't even the most impressive aspects. All mainstream "explanations" ignore the majority of them.
Couldn't they have moulded the blocks in a square cast with grounded limestone and cement type mix? I see the inside is granite stone in important areas but outside appears to be limestone or am I wrong?
There was a limestone outer layer that has been cannibalized throughout the centuries to build nearby structures. Most of that is gone. What you see, the steps, are solid granite. The limestone was cut to make a flat surface from top to bottom. Some of it is still there. Check out the pics. Its quite obvious where there is limestone. And Ive heard this cement nonsense being thrown around. If it were cement, the blocks wouldnt match the composition of the stone they were quaried from. Which is how they figured out where the blocks came from in the first place. As simply as it can be stated, the egyptians did not build the pyramids. Similar megalithic architecture can be found all over the globe. As best as I can figure, there was a global civilization during the last ice age. Thry were advanced, amd prolific. The problem is, that most of what they left behind is under the ocean. The vast majority of our population lives on coastlines. It is highly likely that they would have followed the same ideals, as the bounty of the sea is what allowed most cultures to take root. The coastline, during the last ice age, is now thousands of feet underwater.
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
You're right that the innermost blocks encasing the chambers are granite while the rest of the pyramid is limestone. Whether it's true, solid limestone blocks or some poured limestone concrete is beyond my knowledge.
@Rob Arthur lets build this processing facility hundreds of miles from where the stone is quarried. Seems legit. And ive never said it was aliens. But ill guarantee you it wasnt 4th dynasty egyptians.
@Rob Arthur the stone was not quarried there. They know where it came from because they were able to match it with the stone in a quarry hundreds of miles away. For the three pyramids, that's over 5 million house sized blocks placed in a 27 year period. Thats one every 2.84 minutes. Look up underwater megaliths. Itll blow your mind. Anyway, as best as I can tell, here was a very advanced civilization, (relatively), active during the last ice age. Most of the remains of their civilization lay under hundreds of feet of water. Why underwater? Im so glad you asked. Because a large portion of the earths water supply was trapped in the arctic ice cap. Sea level was roughly 400 feet lower than today. Most of our people live on coasts. It stands to reason that most of theirs did, as well.
I visited the great Pyramids in Egypt in 2016.To see one of the wonders of the world and how people built the pyramids.You have to be there to see and believe it.
absolutely, the gravity of the situation becomes apparent in person, i was there in the 90s, what really struck me was the culture and basic intelligence of the general populace, they are no longer a genepool that could pull this off.
6:49 when he said the words "using modern steel tools" everything you said afterwards is nonsense, the egyptians were a very primitive bronze culture, barly out of the stoneage, steel Vs Limestone = easy bronze Vs lime stone is HARD!! and that still not explains the huge amount of huge granite blocks that are used, cant cut them with bronze, it is way to soft!. and than their are the thousands of vases, plates and pots made from all sorts of hard stone, with a hige degree of pecision that is shocking!. all done with brone tools?? than do it!!, show us!!!.. nope.. steel tools, even in this (yet a other) fake experiment) and they still cant explain simple math, the great pyramid is made from 3.2 million blocks of stone between 5 and 15 ton, the egyptian experts say "the great pyramid was made in 20 years", that means 1 block was cut/ transported, lifted, and put in place every 3 minutes... that is impossible..even with modern tools...... hahaha no!, come on !!!! come with a better explanation!!! 7:53 they just proved the great pyramid cant have been made in 20 years time!, even cheating with modern tools these modernday artisans can only do 1 tiny block of limestone 1.5 hours, and that is not even cutting it from the bedrock OR placing it...
Easier to pay for the construction if it was done in phases instead of all at once. The Khufu phase was probably just restoring the original structure that was constructed millenia prior
How they worked and moved all this stonework is a huge mystery to us, but to the ancient Egyptians it was just as everyday as modern construction is to us.
Again you have to have in mind that the Egyptians had many many workers carving those stones. We could possible say they were working almost 24hrs a day. I'm guessing which is why they finished in such a short time.
Yes they employed a large workforce. Egyptologists estimate based upon the infrastructure to house and feed the workers that the Great Pyramid likely employed ~20-30,000 workers. With that said. Most of the blocks are little more than crudely fractured chunks of stone. Very few of the total represent more carefully cut and in some cases polished blocks. So the pyramids are in truth basically "stacked rubble" surrounded by a layer of more carefully cut stone blocks to "make it look neat". As to time. If it takes a single team of say 50 workers 2 hrs to pick up a block from the adjacent quarry about ~100-200 meters away and haul it up the ramp to dump it in place = then 10 teams can transport 10 blocks in about the same amount of time and so forth. In short the more teams working in tandem the more blocks they can place in a given span of time. The larger blocks found in the bottom half of the pyramids of course take longer while the smaller blocks above can be transported more quickly. So depending upon the number of teams you have dictates how many blocks each team needed to move daily. The crude blocks themselves can be quickly obtained via driving a line of chisels a short distance into the limestone bedrock after which the stone will continue to split yielding approximate sized chunks which can be levered onto sleds and hauled away = or what we see.
@Lilnate94 Fletcher Well there is a lot of speculation on if the treasure was ever there to begin with. So we are told that the pyramids are built with such weird corridors (The shafts leading to each of the chambers are at extreme angles and once the pyramids were opened stairs had to be built to ascend and descend the corridors) in order to confuse grave robbers. However the great pyramid was not breached until 820 AD and no treasure or mummy was found inside. The entrance used today is still the one carved into the pyramid from 820 AD because the original opening was not found and opened until modern times. So now we have the mystery of the pyramids. They were built with elaborate shafts to thwart grave robbers, but after the pyramids were finally breached (thousands of years after construction) No treasure was found to be robbed. We are told that because the grave robbing (Which there is no evidence of any entry into the pyramid before 820 AD) was so bad that the treasures and mummies were moved to the valley of the kings. So, the grave robbery was so bad that the pyramids were built in such a way to thwart grave robbers, and the entrance was not breached until modern times, then the measures to ensure that grave robbery did not happen in the valley of the kings were the treasures and mummies were moved to must be extensive. Nope. You just need to find the entrance, dig through the cap stone, and walk right in and loot the place. The valley of the kings has been plundered by grave robbers for centuries. So we are being lead to believe that the pyramids with their anti-theft features were abandoned with no evidence of theft in order to move the treasures and mummies to a less secure area. Oh and the only mummy ever found in what is referred to as the kings chamber was in the step pyramid and that was a later king who wanted to be associated with the kings of the past so he had his remains laid to rest in the pyramid. There is absolutely zero evidence of old kingdom pharaoh's ever being laid to rest in the pyramids.
That's religion for ya. Most other "theories" like electric generators or water pumps are just bonkers. It's interesting how little we really know since most accepted facts are based wholly or largely on a patchwork of clues left by a culture we know had a habit of taking credit for things done by their rivals and forebears. If we don't start with the assumption that nobody could've been building structures much closer to the end of the last glacial period 12,000 years ago or before then the lower courses of granite facing blocks on several pyramids might suggest they were originally the walls of very large mastabas built by a culture that had iron tools before collapsing probably due to catastrophic climate change 10,000 to 12,0000 years ago only for the people of dynastic Egypt, perhaps their actual descendants, to co-opt and try to upstage the works that were already there. If you look at some cutaway concepts of how the internal bulk of the pyramids is possibly arranged they often look like stepped mastabas of two or three large levels with more material slapped on to make a true pyramid. Not to mention even the ancient Egyptians left very few depictions of the pyramids and the ones they left are oddly inaccurate showing thinner spikes like fat obelisk looking things which might just be what roof and walls of the kings chamber was originally holding up. Who can say.
There wasn't any sign of any pharaoh or Epyptian like tomb whatsoever in the Pyramid. The Pyramids were built for something else. To think that everything ancient is only temples and tombs is crazy.
They were more advanced than us back then. They weren’t cut. The stones were manipulated with telepathy and lifted the same way. That’s why the stones fit together so tight and well. The power of the mind allowed them to manipulate the atoms in the stones and make them fit like a puzzle.
😂😅 Telepathy has nothing to do with moving objects with the mind. That would be telekinetics. Regardless this is fanciful speculation especially because of all the evidence that the stones were physically moved. There is some hypothesis that the limestone could be made on site like cement to fit a specific space, but so far there is no evidence for that either.
1974 Joseph Davidovits, a French concrete chemist, has been proposing that the pyramids and tem- ples of Old Kingdom Egypt were built of geopolymer "con- crete" poured into molds, rather than quarried blocks of limestone
@@Woodman.420 🤣 Try not to trip over your own shadow and harm yourself. Perhaps a cranial helmet might help........ Moral of the story: you are a "shill" - or a 🦜 Your "researcher" = is the clickbait artist. If you can't even recognize this - I doubt anyone can help you. 🤦♂ p.s. - do not think I failed to notice how you "deflected" here to avoid addressing what I pointed out for you. Davidovits = fraudster.
The guy that did the pyramid disassembling animation seems to have been very proud of his work.
I don’t think he/she had any part in how much they used it in the video... they probably commissioned someone to do it and I bet it was expensive so they decided to maximise the use of the animation to get its value worth.
@@tee8839 was a funny joke tho
Vincent Vuna you have to elaborate on that please
@@VincentVuna I agree. Made me laugh 😆
He also worked on the 2nd Ninja Turtles when Kraang showed up..haha
I like how the title says “how did they cut the granite blocks” but goes on to not mention how they did it at all lol
Just small details that’s all 😂 Yeah no way Egyptians built these. Plus I read they meant to be some sort of cooling system, according to all the tunnels etc.
Bosch power tools 😂
Yep
Yea they said granite in the title, in the video they used steel to cut limestone lmfaoo, discovery channel, the elites think so little of us 😂
They were built not by humans. Mankind does not have that technology.
Not even today.
Lower the music and effects lol, what is this
Thank you. I was high and I thought if my hearing is fucked because i was trying so hard to listen to what he had to say
Rookies bro
This
Is
SPARTA!
IT REMAINS UNMATCHED TO THIS DAY!!! *WARP DRIVE ACCELERATION NOISE*
LMFAO
This is about limestone blocks, which are extremely soft. Not the same thing as quarrying granite.
I can't hear anything. All I know is that these animations are slick af
The sound effects are louder than the narrator. Fail.
And subtitles are not working.
It's the Egyptian Power of the Sound Gods!
What?
he also talk bull iin the video
@@Pauluz_The_Web_Gnome
Sound Gods is almost correct.
It is quite common knowledge that Khufu was NEVER interned in that Pyramid or EVER lay in the granite box. No One knows when the pyramid was built. All that this video shows is pure speculation.
The first builders of the pyramids were at the end of the second dynasty. They knew the technique of building pyramids, and pyramids such as Saqqara, the Amphitheater, Meidum, and the Red Pyramid were previous experiences.
@Rob Arthur Pyramids are named after ancient greek word for "cake" because of its form. Quit your bullshitymology
That is most History, and what most "professionals" spute
yeah it’s called history
Maybe they had help from Giant animals that is extinct today???🤔
I watched a separate vid about the pyramids and it stated how even the measurements of this structure is so advance of its time and how it has hidden purpose to locate things in the sky. And now i'm even more amazed by how it's built inside.. the intricate design of its interior and each and every single corner has a purpose of its own. 😮 how astonishing
And in 40 years he never realized there was no mummy or treasure ever found there, even though it was sealed when originally found? And I kind of feel like those narrow tunnels wouldn't have been very practical for getting all that treasure in or out. And Occam's Razor would say that starting with an arbitrary timeline and trying to invent building techniques to make the timeline plausible is a lot of mental gymnastics when a more likely explanation would be that Kufu didn't build it and it's probably a lot older than they say.
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
Exactly! The dynastic egyptians didn't build any of these structures. They just scribbled their hieroglyphs on lots of them and stole history!
Not to mention that unlike the Valley of the Kings or other ancient Egyptian burial tombs, there are NO hieroglyphs inscribed on the inner walls of the Giza pyramids. They're just blank. Very unusual for the Egyptians who covered everything in inscriptions.
@@tubedude54 so who the hell build them??
@@alvinmchaga And that's the $64,000 question none of the mainstream archaeologists want to address!
The title of this video is "How Did The Ancient Egyptians Cut The Granite Blocks To Build The Pyramids" but we only see limestones being carved. This is misleading. How did they cut 70 - 100 tons of "granite" (not limestone) and move it above the chambers in many of the pyramids?
New Discoveries at Wadi al-Jarf
ruclips.net/video/FB9xT2aWXSY/видео.html
The Port, the Papyrus, and the Great Pyramid
ruclips.net/video/VMOqCobDEc4/видео.html
Diary Of A Pyramid Labourer // Oldest Papyrus Discovered 2550 BC "Diary of Merer"
ruclips.net/video/UyQpxzbL_BM/видео.html
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
Exactly. These kind of documentaries produced by major networks like History Channel or Discovery are such trash. They always invent these narratives that involve a lot of imaginative conjecture like how they just assume Kufu set the timetable and "is hopeful" the project goes well. What hieroglyph or papyrus scroll are they reading that edict or diary entry from, exactly?
And not only did they not answer the original question about granite as you said, but they even showed how exceedingly impractical it was to cut limestone with steel tools and even admitted that it would be almost impossible within the completely arbitrary timetable.
The Samarian Tablets discussed the Pyramids thousands of years prior to the birth of Kufu.
There is an Pyramid agenda to keep the Egyptian narrative going at all costs when in fact, these great pyramids were built approximately 10,000 years earlier, ....LONG before the reign of the Egyptians.
The Sphinx has deep water grooves along it's base which strongly supports this time line.
This article discusses TRUTH regarding history which is always kept secret because the Elite Cabal possess some of the ancient knowledge unknown to most regarding ancient aliens, free energy (which was produced by the Pyramid), healing, levitation and plasma based energy required for dimentional space travel.
Some of all that stuff is disclosed below in the linked article, and some of this material will be further disclosed to us (the masses) later this year when the Central Banking System collapses, the Cabal falls, and many of the ELITE are rounded up for prosecution related to the Covid-19 scandal and Crimes Against Humanity!
Free Energy, Space travel,, Alien presence, and GOD as we know him are definitely going to be known by all at some point this year as this great global Cabal EVIL is exterminated!
alien-ufo-sightings.com/2015/10/the-10th-sumerian-tablet-the-anunnaki-built-the-pyramids/
Check out the granite boxes at the serapeum of saqqara ruclips.net/video/frhysD0G4mg/видео.html
Watching this video leaves you with more questions than answers. 40 years of research and gained the knowledge equivalent to what is taught in high school
40 years studying the pyramids and still no idea how they were built.
@@ScreamingEagleFTW According to modern engineers the pyramids could not be built with state of the art equipment let alone copper tools.
And no records whatsoever on how they were built.
@@ScreamingEagleFTW Maybe you could show in detail just how easy you make it sound. I've spent years reading theories on how the pyramids were built and for every proposal there's a dozen reasons why it wouldn't work. Seriously I would love to see your proposal and I'm sure the engineering community would too.
It's rational to conclude that if we can't do it now we couldn't do it thousands of years ago with no technology.
UFO's are now officially recognised by world governments so why not alien technology? Atlantis and previous technologically advanced civilisations cannot be dismissed. Both possibilities seem more plausible than ancient Egyptians who hadn't even invented the wheel.
Looks like we will have to agree to disagree. Time will reveal the truth.
What gets me is that the Egyptians were meticulous about recording literally everything they did. Their everyday lives even down to monotonous tasks is highly documented and yet, not one piece of information of how they built the pyramids.
I have the answer to the question in the title of the video .... NO ONE KNOWS !!!!
True
I know! Fallen angels!
Lol xd
@@cesar5478 good joke
*no one knows for sure.
There are plenty of theories.
A great many of them don't require aliens or ridiculous 'ancient high technology' prattle as so many armchair archeologists on RUclips make constant talk of for fun, but far more often for profit.
the sound is ridiculously loud XD I can barley hear the guy talk bro
Don’t use head phones while watching this
@@hollywood739 i’m watching it on my tv and i can barely hear this guy speak, it’s just music
"How Did The Ancient Egyptians Cut The Granite Blocks"
'We don't know but watch us use modern tools to cut a limestone one'
"There's a sucker born every minute" was a saying in the 19th century about P.T Barnum being able to trick people into believing in nonsensical things like the ‘Fiji mermaid,” “The Cardiff Giant” the “161 year old nursemaid” and many other hoaxes designed to earn an income from.
The ability continues into the internet age and the fantastical stories & videos on RUclips about “lost civilizations,” “unexplainable mysteries” and “ancient high technology" put out by profit seeking book authors like Graham Hancock, Brien Foerster, UnchartedX, Randall Carlson and others like them are the proof.
he fire technique near the unfinished obelisk takes place between 13:00 and 20:00.
ruclips.net/video/nCZpXXUraeM/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/qeS5lrmyD74/видео.html
@@davidleomorley889 Appreciate the links but im not sure what it has to do with this video and my comment?
The fire technique is interesting but granite cracks are not flat like slate and would still require a very long time and impressive technology to get the faces as flat and smooth as those found in Giza for example.
@@Orangebery
You: "The fire technique is interesting but granite cracks are not flat like slate and would still require a very long time and impressive technology to get the faces as flat and smooth as those found in Giza for example."
Me: They had "a very long time" because quarrying, moving, cutting and shaping stone was their job. The pharaoh required it to be done...and so they found a way.
Experimental archeology has shown that cutting and drilling accurately into granite can happen using simple copper tools in conjunction with an abrasive made of a harder stone and water.
Many people want it to be "impossible" because it's fun to believe it was impossible. Solutions and experiments that show how it was likely done are dismissed by the victims of RUclips pseudoscience because they don't want answers....they want the mystery to remain...because the mystery is what attracts them to the subject in the first place.
ruclips.net/video/_fIigpabcz4/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/g305wqCdPRs/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/Mq2KGQajfAo/видео.html&feature=emb_logo
I'd suggest making the music far louder next time. It will be even more unpleasent to watch. The achivement will be incredible!
Modern scientists just love to call these structures 'primitive' but the are still puzzled on how they egyptians built it
They didn`t. Recently finds carbon dates it back to 10.000BC.
@@Master_zzz but the "scientific" community still refuses to accept... Just like "Fuente Magna bowl" from south america.
Actually he just showed us the work was shoddy at the top and they used imperfect blocks stuffed with mortar to seal gaps
@@Master_zzz how do you carbon date a rock? 😆
Because the Egyptians didn't build them, as said in the book of Enoch which they keep hidden from the public.
I love how that manipulative "expert" calls it a primitive machine lol. Those are not thombs by any means, but even if they are/where, they are anything but primitive.
The only primitive things i saw in that video was the 🧠s of those experts
@@noumanahmad86
I think the word he meant to use was simple, as in a simple machine. The wheel, winch, axle, pulley, lever, wedge and ramp (inclined plane) are the examples of simple machines. They allow you to do things using less effort at the cost of taking longer.
@@view1st though these were clearly not used in the construction of the pyramids.
@@DragonX-dl6yo
How do you know for sure? Besides, all images that I've seen that depict the construction of the pyramids always show the construction teams hauling blocks up ramps (inclined planes) using logs as rollers (axles, primitive or quasi‐wheels). I don't know if they ever used pulleys but I wouldn't rule it out entirely. They may have very well used wedges in the quarrying of and shaping stones too.
@@view1st Because the amount of rubbish mainstream archeology push on us to make sure it fits their narrative. For example, so many people were ridiculed when the theory of humans living in the Americas over 130,000 years ago was put forward ( graham hancock being one of those people ) but when the evidence was shown, they had no choice but to apologise. There has been no evidence left behind to prove the pyramids were built the way mainstream egyptologist suggest. Any stone mason or master builder will tell you it is impossible to cut granite or drill holes straight through with the tools that had been around at that time. This was not done by slaves. It was done by an advanced group of people at the peak of their skill. The pyramids were not built to house tombs either as no bodies have ever been recovered inside. Just like the majority of these ancient sites around the world that are built to align with certain celestial bodies in space, the pyramids were purposely built on true north and have a lot of encoded knowledge. There is SO MUCH missing in our story...
Whoever edited the audio on this was drunk
Things to remember:
1 - quarries do not typically cut stone "on demand". Quarries run in continuous operation and thus = they should have partially quarried blocks on hand at any given time.
2 - the Egyptian engineers would have known how much granite was required before the foundation of the pyramid was even laid out.
3 - so the quarry such as Aswan would have had literally years to quarry what granite was needed and transport it to Giza before it would need to be placed in the pyramid.
4 - what granite you see in Old Kingdom pyramids = basic shapes - typically blocks.
5 - so blocks could be obtained from the bedrock via dolerite pounders and fire. More precise cutting could be done using weighted copper saws and an abrasive such as sand or corundum. Polishing would be done via flat blocks and an abrasive. A sarcophagus could be cut using saws to obtain the exterior shape which is then polished smooth. The interior could be removed via chipping out using gneiss stone tools and/or possible copper tube drills to remove cores of stone. The inside would then be polished smooth the same as the exterior.
Yes it is time consuming = but they had the time. Work on the sarcophagus which would have taken the longest time to fabricate likely began soon after Khufu assumed the throne - which is when work on a Pharaoh's tomb typically began. It then would have been placed in the King's Chamber before the walls went up much the same as a bathtub is installed in a room when it is wider than the door and the room constructed around it.
Next to Khafre's valley temple adjacent the Sphinx was once a deepwater harbor. Merer's diary relates how during the months of the annual Nile flood is when stone from distant quarries would be transported to Giza via a system of canals and dikes they created to channel water to the harbor so as to allow heavily laden ships to access it. So granite and other basalts along with the white Tura limestone casing stones would be shipped in on barges to Giza during this time of high water each year.
Wow, a person who actually studied the topic and doesn't parrot fringe conspiracies. A rare but welcome sight!
@@MrAchile13 Force of habit I'm afraid as a consequence of a career spent in an applied science field. Thus I am compelled to evaluate all relevant evidence to ascertain plausibility as opposed to simply parroting claims often based upon ignorance of said evidence as you alluded to.
Moral of the story: in so much as I enjoy history as a hobby for more than 40+ years I have tried to obtain an understanding of the evidence here. I then as noted apply critical thought to what they represents and what goes on relating to the same.
For most simply understanding "what" happens is as far as they go. I prefer to try to understand "how" and "why" things occur so as to better understand the nature of a thing. Enjoy your day.
@@varyolla435 Hmm, but the limestone was close by - no need for it to be shipped: ruclips.net/video/3ceW_4q1I50/видео.html
@@edelgyn2699 Yes = but the video deals with granite and not limestone - otherwise I would have addressed that as well. I am aware of Egyptian quarrying operations and the work of geo-archeologists such as Per Storemyr who study them.
The granite at the time it was acquired, was still malleable. Once it was fashioned into position, laid on a dry surface with the sun cooking it in extreme heat, the curing process would have happened within months. As this was happening, more internal stone could be 📐 set, built upon, added upon and smoothed out, as everything they were working with was soft and malleable. It being assembled in much smaller pieces, would have welded together, creating a finished product of great size.
Never assume that what you are looking at today, was how it was at it's creation.
Take for example a 100 year old wooden house. At the time it was built, the wood contained a lot of moisture and easiest to cut and shape, but today, it's dry as a sun bleached bone 🦴 and very hard to cut and shape.
Firewood is another example, being green and full of moisture when cut, but seasoned and it's dry and ready to burn.
This looked interesting, I wonder what they were saying.
Didn't even touch on the granite..only the limestone.... cutting granite with copper tools?
I don't think so!
Bbbbbbutt they told us that, so it must be so! LOL
@@chhansen9813 This is correct. No matter your IQ, line of work or designation after your name it will NEVER equal the brain power of certain Egyptology "experts" and their assumptions. To even question a decree made by Hawas or Lehner is complete heresy. It is very surprising to me that the Egyptian Inquisition hasn't been launched to root out the naysayers and heretics and burn them all at the stake or tie them to a chair and toss them in the Nile to see if they sink or float?
It has been done
@@CEOofSleep obviously! the ancient egyptians did it! then they disappeared...
@@darthbog2125 no 4 guys that aren't skilled carved a 2.5T rock from the quarry, took them 2 days and they didn't use modern tools
Bright Insight's video: "Demonstration Proves we have No Idea How the Ancient Egyptians Built the Pyramids..."
Is way better than this crap.
No? Check out these guys cutting and drilling granite with copper blades and sand.
ruclips.net/video/qeS5lrmyD74/видео.html
Check out how to assemble blocks:
ruclips.net/video/ZFEjBtPOPNk/видео.html
If they were built by them to begin with.
I used to buy into bright insights videos and all the conspiracy history theories. But there all crap, there is far far more evidence that the mainstream theories are correct. I actually felt a little duped but then i guess it was my own fault for believing them,.
@@Grunchy005 what......you are not looking at ALL that is missing from this theory.....funny how Zowhari has buffaloed many sharp men
@@philwhatever3903 I like watching bright insight, I don’t buy into everything but I also don’t buy into the mainstream either.
The question is not how you work limestone with steel, it's how you work granite with copper.
ruclips.net/video/XQkQwsBhj8I/видео.html
you use high pressure water to cut.
You work granite with harder granite and water.
Apparently it wasn’t very effective since his grave is empty.
@christian smith cool
@christian smith Ye they realy gonna build a pyramid like the great pyramid just for being a tomb. Makes no sense. Humans are not stupid. And like whole nature. Human certainly not gonna waste loads and loads of time and energy for something that need be finished before someone dies... with chances of being 0 it will be completed in time
They just used the construction that was already there for their tombs. Now if you find a small grave underground. That might be created as tombs yes.
Just explain why there isnt a single heiroglyph inside the giza pyramid. While every other burial place is full of them...
That's because he didn't built it. This is the same old BS... Even though new studies show the age to be much older...
@@Syphirioth thank you, it's so obvious... He didn't built it... Every tomb found is totally different from the so called kufu piramid tomb... BS
@christian smith Yes a tomb for all this they could not enter after closing...
It makes no sense to do this and I understand what you try to say. But no it doesnt make sense.
About evidence. Why is the giza pyramid the so called only tomb without a single hieroglyph on its inner walls. This should tell you more then enough!! Cause every other one has the opposite of nothing and is full with hieroglyphs.
Also go see the small robot camera that went into the long tiny tunnel in the giza pyramid. It has markings inside. And no they are not hieroglyphs.
What is truly staggering about these massive pyramids is the wealth required to build just one
Even the Taj Mahal does not even come close
Wealth don't mean shit to aliens.
Wealth doesn’t mean shit , when your a slave forced to work
@@nawfsidebro58 Slaves ain't cutting blocks that perfectly though 😆🤷♂️
@@nawfsidebro58 🤦♂️ For one, slaves cost money; a lot of money when you own them in the thousands. Two, there is no evidence that slaves built the pyramids, but we do know that the workers who inhabited the area thousands of years ago were well fed and clothed. Three, there is no evidence that the Pyramids were built in that era, by those people. Four, your comment would have more credibility but taking at least some of that into consideration and would be even more convincing if you knew your your, you're and yore's.
Unless every Egyptian was tasked with paying for a stone.
Don't make me laugh the great Pyramid is not from Khufu's time period.
It is far older.
Yup.
How do you know?
@spidy9237 Though we have no evidence for the Pyramids being older than 5,000 BCE we do have some for the Sphinx. The water erosion marks on the Sphinx could have only formed 12,000 years ago… Remember Plato? He even said Atlantis fell to its destruction around 12,000 BCE… Plato even said that the tale of Atlantis was not a lie… even Gobekli Tepe was there around the same time period
@spidy9237 Lolll my mans thinks war didn’t exist m, how do you think nations get back years behind? Lol because of war. Lets not forget they found a calculator made out of BONES that traces back to ANCIENT egypt (kingdom of kush) now you tell me how they made that shiit?? Way back then? Comee on son
@@Ash-bl7vm whats the ancient story about atlantis like wich story comes frequently in diverent tribes?
I believe that the entire Kings chamber and Grand Gallery were built with granite blocks weighing 80k+ lbs each with some being hoisted(or whatever) over 300ft off the ground and placed with pinpoint precision. You don't do that with ropes, pulleys, and manpower. There's something we don't know.
There's some solid theories though. They used a external ramp a third the way up then had a interior ramp that wrapped up and around to the top.
Sound technology
Do you guys know that they measured the feed rate of the drill used in the granite blocks by measuring the grooves? The feed rate whoever built them used was 500 times greater than what we can do today🤯Egyptians did not build them. They simply discovered them and used them as tombs.
@@mikesilverthorn911 .....That's been debunked. Scientists against Myths have shown how its done with basic drill shown in hieroglyphs in pyramids .
@@mikesilverthorn911 We literally have the paystubs from the workers who built them.
0:22 One tries to suggest a relatively primitive processing of the contact surfaces of the Giza quarry limestone blocks by drawing with large gaps at the joints. Other drawings show an accuracy of the structure in the range of half a Millimeter. However, CAT drawings such as those made by Gantenbrink show the accuracy of the structure. Some take this picture of the outer walls which was destroyed by two thousands of years, of quarrig work on the site, as an example of the quality of the inner block structure. But if, as in the drawings shown here, there should only be a 5 mm gap between the stones, the number of blocks would result in settlements in the 10 meter range. The outer skin of the Tura limestone casing would have caused by settle movements of the structure crumble and fallen off by itself after a few hundred years.
"The Great Pyramid of Giza contains 2.3 million individual blocks of stone, meaning one block would have to be laid every five minutes of every hour, 24 hours a day, for the entire 20 years. The problem? Each block weighs at least 2 tons. That’s 1,764,000 pounds of stone being laid every day for 20 years." Explain this Discovery if you can
Not when you have a work force of 40thousand men..
ruclips.net/video/UeL3bfwu-Zk/видео.html
Assuming they laid 1 stone at a time
Why only lay one block at a time?
@Fist Bump Possibly the dumbest idea of all.
Are you sure they didn't remove your own brain with sound frequency levitation in order to make you believe in that nonsense?
Do the maths add up? Mark Lehner is on record as saying that the pyramid was built in 85 years. If Kufu reigned for 36 years then how did he order the pyramid to be completed by his death?
Also, let's look at the maths on a very simplistic level. First, we turn 85 years into minutes: 85 x 365 x 24 x 60 = 44,676,000 (being the number of minutes in 85 years). Then we divide those minutes by the number of stones placed within the structure. Many accept the number to be 2.3 million stones. Let's be generous, let's say 2 million. All we have to do now is divide the number of minutes in 85 years by the number of stones laid and we will get the time in minutes it took to lay the stones.
44,676,000 divided by 2,000,000 = 22.33.
What this means is that the Egyptians, working on the model presented in this film, quarried, transported and installed a block of stone, some weighing 7 tons or more, every 22.3 minutes, 24 hours a day for 85 years.
The film itself states at 08.05 that experts believe it would have taken the craftsmen half a day just to square the stone off. Half a day excluding the quarrying, transportation and installation.
Let's bear in mind two other factors. 1. That we believe the blocks were transported on the Nile and that possibly can only happen when it is in flood. This means that transportation of blocks, which would have to go on day and night if we accept the thesis of this film, probably could not be conducted year-round but only in certain months. 2. These figures concerning the 2 million stones does not include the building of the infrastructure of the pyramid and nor does it include the extensive work done in preparing the foundations.
If we accept the thesis of this film then we can start by multiplying the number of stones by 6 hours (half a working day): 2.3 million x 6 = 13,800,000. That is 13,800,000 hours just to shape the blocks by the film's own demonstration. Divide this by 24 gives us the number of days and divide by 365 gives us the number of years.
13,800,000 divide by 24 divide by 365 = 1575. That's one thousand, five hundred and seventy-five years just to shape the blocks.
And let us remember that this film production is using steel tools for the task they can only complete in half a day. According to the same experts, the Egyptians only had copper tools which were weaker and much less effective than steel.
The final assumption that a technique of rubble infill for the internal structure speeds up the build time cannot possibly be true because that infill is not counted in the 2 million stones used to construct the main architecture. The figures above still apply but you have to try and work out how much extra time they took creating the rubble infill. In that calculation, you also have to take into account that a lot of the internal structure is actually precisely fitted and built. If a degree level student in engineering tried to propose such an idea it is doubtful they would obtain any qualification.
The real problem here is whether we can ask if this film represents a woeful lack of scholarship. All we are doing is looking at the numbers and I ask you whether you think they add up? I am not proposing any other theory about the pyramids, I am not suggesting any radical ideas, all I am saying is that if we do the maths then the whole premise of this film has to be questioned severely. But why is it that supposedly intelligent people are running with a theory which is so questionable? More worryingly, what on earth is going on in academia when archaeology faculties cannot question their own established histories and apply critical thinking?
@Rob Arthur Seriously Rob Arthur? Photographic evidence??? What about actually counting them? People have counted them and that's why Egyptologists recognise between 2.3 and 2.5 million stones as being the number in the pyramid. Even Wikipedia states: "The Great Pyramid was built by quarrying an estimated 2.3 million large blocks weighing 6 million tonnes in total." . I have to conclude that you do not know what you are talking about.
@@j.folder8276 Well that is an accolade I probably do not deserve. None of what I have said is original to myself, this is all a well known and well worn critique which is dismissed by archaeology departments around the world as a 'conspiracy theory'. Amazing really! I am a trained historian and do not deal in anything I can't prove or mount credible questions about. Yet I have been told that 'doing the maths' like this is a conspiracy theory. Why? Well I have my own perspective on this but it is little more than speculation. Undermining the received history about Egypt and the pyramids then brings into question a western civilisation model propagated for the last two hundred years in elite western universities. Nobody in the senior common room warming their feet by a log fire whilst sipping a brandy wants that sort of enquiry to stand ground. Better the history we teach than the history that is there in the bricks and mortar!
I have been inside the great pyramid. As a carpenter by trade, I placed my face against the wall and looked up the 45 degree tunnel. The perfection of the smooth, straight rock was amazing. The only word that came out of my mouth was - IMPOSSIBLE.
@@rafttherogue3692 It just really annoys that archaeologists will not hear the voices of engineering and trade professionals because, and this has been quoted to me, "...they are not trained archaeologists and therefore not qualified to talk about such things.". Being dismissed as 'conspiracy theorist' is also insulting. I am a trained and working historian. I was trained to evaluate sources, to grade information, to eschew propaganda and always, always, always to ask questions of my own conclusions. I am not suggesting computer controlled lathes, I am not suggesting alien architecture, all I am saying is that there is something wrong with the current interpretation. Something obviously wrong when you look at the engineering of buildings and artefacts. As you say, impossible!
Time and time again; when a clip shows “how” blocks were shaped and cut, all they are really showing is “how they weren’t”
No pharos were found inside neither hieroglyphics
The fact they still think the pyramids were tombs is hysterical.
Agreed 👍
so what were they?
Yes what were they? And of course we’ll need some proof also not just a silly wild ass guess that you made up
@@damianbiue7728 /////Temples... GP was called "The Temple of Osiris"
@@mbrownie22 only reason I'm replying is the number 22 in your name, a number that follows me everywhere the date I was born my best friend was born, to much to list, then this random video I found which was produced yes you guessed it on my birthday 22nd August. ruclips.net/video/2fS9ixfQ_no/видео.html
There's so much wrong with this video and explanations, it's almost worse than listening to a politician.
Great comment
@@apurbadeb7618 Thanks, but more important, simply true.
I love RUclips comments hobby experts, they are always so sure of themselves
@@blablabla6975 I understand, but take for example ''They were build 2500 BC'' .
That's a blatant lie, could be true, but nobody knows. They arrived at that number by artifacts found in the surrounding area, which is flawed science.
0:25 ''Kufu hoped this colossal monument would preserve his mummie.....''
Who said it was build for a burial ? And no mummie has ever been found inside a pyramid, so another dumb assumption.
Carving extremely precise granite or even harder materials with the tools from that time is simply impossible, even today's technologies will have big problems making such things.
If those huge slabs above the 'king's chamber, are for preventing collapse because of the huge weight above it, then why is the 'queen's chamber only having one while being below the level of the former ? Another dumb assumption.
Showing how to split a stone block with modern steel tools, o ok. Now try that with the copper chisels and hammer, see you in a few years.
And these are just a few examples, but if you would dive in a bit deeper, by for example following the channel UnchartedX This is a nice video to start with : ruclips.net/video/6KUDu40BC5o/видео.html
Yeah!
“This whole thing is like a primitive machine”
Couldn’t have said it better my self
This is kind of insulting. Exactly Zero bodies, coffins, intricate etched wall art or burial artifacts have ever been found at the great pyramid. Also, recent evidence suggests it was built way before 2500 BC.
The funny thing is, the pharaoh who its said to be responsible. Well there has only ever been one statue of him ever found and its about the size of your hand. why would a king who’s ego is so big, he built the largest building in the world for thousands of years, not have many many great statues? Why would there not be a record of this great project in hieroglyphs? Historians are still trying to fit everything into the last 10K years. But we know homo sapiens (as well as many other types of humans) have been around for hundreds of thousands of years. Their DNA is exactly the same as it is now, their intelligence or biological brain structure was the same as it is now.
Another problem we have is; its Archeologists, Egyptologists and historians who make the final decision on how things where built/made instead of Stone masons and Architects. Its ludicrous and makes no sense.
the Pyramids of Bosnia, are much taller and much older that the so called "Great" pyramid of Egypt.
@@scottgouker808hardwrkr mountains and hills generally are older and bigger then pyramids
@James Mcanish they were also known to graffiti the older Egyptians” work with their own hieroglyphs as well. Such as the granite boxes in the Serrapeum of Saccara and they vandalized the so called Sphinx.
Of course these things are ignored when you want your name to live on forever in the history books.
@James Mcanish true and statues etc….. But the biggest laugh is when historians say that the Egyptians didn’t have the wheel. this for me is the most stupidest comment to come out of the history books. its like “oh yea? Then how did their cranes work?” How did they drill things etc
This is almost laughable. This theory has been disproven.
I was thinking the same
How?
By who?
@@DanielSchmidt94521 kids. This lies worse than msm russia
LOL...
There's nothing more in this world that I'd like to know more than how the ancients cut, moved and placed megalith structures. Hope to know in my lifetime.
Easy.. same way on how u make bricks and cement blocks.
Try that for an example this guy is doing great then I think they just moved them as needed
No cutting, pouring.
Geopolymer
@@jclaytoncabral5106 geopolymer was invented in 1979 lmao
@@JR-ub2wt So, you were there, thousands of years ago when the pyramids were being built knowing the builders did not have knowledge of geopolymer technology?
Just because something was rediscovered recently does not mean possible ancient advanced civilizations lacked these abilities as stated by Graham Hancock.
A few criticisms: 1) They are still pushing this narrative that it was a tomb. 2) As "Jeff" commented they never explained how the blocks were cut with copper tools when the men in the video didn't even cut one with modern tools. 3) It was sometimes hard to hear the narrative with the overpowering dramatic music and sound effects. 4) This is a regurgitation of the crap taught from history books 50 years ago.
5:35 those aren’t chiseled marks! The structure is 3500yrs old now and looking at the condition of the worlds climate, weathering will definitely take place.
He’s saying it like they were chiseled last 2yrs lmaooo.
Theirs pyramid were smoother than we think.
the structure is about 4500 years old. And the blocks he was pointing at was uncovorede about 200 years ago. The lower parts of the pyramids were covered over with sand. Its desert after all. So the marks actualy is 4500 years old. Also the stones hes pointing is inner srones that are roughly cut.
Not the first time the sound effects are super loud, there is enough comments to maybe have a look into it ?
After watching the compelling cases of the ancient astronaut theories and pyramids all around the world- this conventional explanation sounds like cartoon stories for kids. If only there's a time machine, haha
more likely anchient humans had some form of advanced technology and were wiped out by a massive cataclysm. the younger dryas impact theory was a likely event. then stone age men found the ruins and occupied them
Yeah and when exactly was any mummy ever found in any pyramid????????
The pyramid never had a mummy. The closest thing to Giza is Teotihuacan and there, it is clear that it was a technical structure.
Fooling the kids, that is it. The problem only arises when you are in a society that is stuck on christianity and islam, like the west and middle east. Those theistic religions say the world was created 6600 BCE. That is the problem. In India, there would be no problem with pyramids and all that. They have books that go back 15.000 years.
There is no evidence whatsoever of any alien advanced civilization. Thats fucking TV , not reality
7:15 This is the original meaning of the phrase “good tools is half the job”, because it used to take literally as much time to keep tools in good condition as doing the actual craft.
I can't begin to imagine the amount of manpower it took to build these pyramids. Absolutely amazing!
Aliens did it not humans
@@leztahdezmu5562 Is God. You better start to kneel bc your judgement day is coming, like all of ours. We just didn't appear here
Nowadays in Egypt to build a bridge with heavy machinery it takes 3 to 5 years. And destroy buildings asides. The Sisi presedent damage whole Egypt
@@leztahdezmu5562 Alien did it, not the black people, right?
@@leztahdezmu5562 what is Alians who told u that.stope saying garbage
it will likely not happen in my lifetime but I believe someday science will realize the Egyptians did not build the pyramids
It's already been proven. The pyramids are between 12,000 and 32,000 years old based on erosion. The stones were poured not cut.
Who did🙄🙄🙄
When you make a video like this, and don't include closed captioning, folks who are half deaf like myself can't enjoy your efforts.
A THOMB? WTF
THIS IS WHAT MAIN ACADEMIA WANTS YOU TO KNOW...
Damn, you'd think Discovery UK would have top sounds guys working on their videos.
I think they were more advanced than us😀
absolutely they were...they were around 5000 years...everyone ate well and was a skilled physician...beer and bread with every meal no matter your income...
@Toby Thompson you see bro, you need to provide evidence with your statements, otherwise you live in the very populated city of the trolls...and they are not sophisticated at all
The blocks weren’t chiselled they was cut with a circular saw! Anyone that things all those tunnels under Egypt were cut with a copper chisel are just being mugged off! There is also no evidence that there was ever a pharaoh in that pyramid. Where are the hieroglyphics on the walls and ceiling? don’t say weathering because they have survived in more open buildings close to the pyramid. It’s about time these false history narratives made up by people who wanted their names to live on in the history books are done away with now! Because the majority of intelligent people don’t buy it and won’t ever buy it! There is a lot more evidence that they are wrong!
@@andrefecteau What evidence do you have that they were all skilled physicians?
That bullshit line of asking for evidence is more than a little hypocritical when making a statement like that.
For certain they had a great cache of skilled stone workers, but physicians?
Such a number of physicians would be completely unnecessary when a handful of them could serve dozens is not hundreds of workers each.
Do try and use a little basic common sense before resorting to insulting people when you clearly can't even think for yourself with that kind of nonsense in your 'arguments'.
@@mnomadvfx hey Kenny go fuck yourself, I read it online in the history of Egypt...you are troll king ...you just post and talk shit...so once you get your head out of your ass maybe you'll see straight...no doctor needed
Built 2500 years ago by ancient Egyptians huh?
The Giza Pyramids were ancient long before any “ancient Egyptians” existed.
You've got your dates wrong.
Need to lower the background music, guys.
yea
I really want to visit Egypt and see those pyramids .
I wanted to see the twin towers and the pyramids, so lets hope the Egyptian govt doesnt fly planes into the pyramids and they get obliterated into a fine dust and fall at free fall speed!
Just go to Vegas they have smaller ones
Right off the bat the author claims this is a tomb. I left at that nonsense. That whole theory has been thoroughly exploded many times over. Yawn.
What else could it be built for other than as a tomb? I don't believe that it is a tomb at all, but let's just call it a tomb for now until a much better answer comes up.
These videos are eye filling and I watch them just for that. Over my long life I heard many theories and I know by now that every young people like express his own theory. And I leave at that-just an opinion that every one has the right to express.
I would like to hear your opinion please?
I've always thought the Pyramids were inherited by the Egyptians and they were built pre Flood as was the Sphinx.
@@bp4682 ME TOO
@@bp4682 but i think that erosion on the sphinx could be from the last thousand years
could you lower your voice, I can't hear the background music
Now explain how they made the granite vases of which there are thousands, some of which are the thickness of glass.
The crazy part is the lack of tools found anywhere. There's essentially nothing to help explain any of these artifacts
@Rob Arthur If this were true it would have taken an inordinate amount of diamonds and the ability to crush them into consistently sized powder. This also does not explain how the vases were hollowed out, this would have to be fixed to one end of the "lathe". A wooden foot powered lathe could not have the speed accuracy or stability to do this.
Sacred geometry decoded channel just put out a video on making a granite ring with ancient techniques. I think he gets it down to 2mm thickness. It’s worth watching and only took him about a day to make.
Smaller pounding stones maybe? lol
It’s a fact nothing was found in the kings room lol crazy how they’ll just lie
Copper chisels and pounding stones of course
🤣
They had 10 million or so sharp chisels a thousand or more slaves handing them to the stonecutters. That's a lot of copper man. They could excavate the ground and get billions of dollars in copper flakes,chips from those chisels 🤣
Lol!☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺
@@johnnylangford6952 so you believe that not only do you have 2.3 million stones that has to be quarried and carried miles to even get to the location, but you believe that added to that they had to make millions of chisels. And that slaves were skilled enough to pull of a modern marvel on the time frame they try to claim. Not only that but pyramids around the world just so happen to be built at the same time all out of coincidence..
I used to laugh at these things too. I was a fool to be duped by the conspiracy theory history videos. The reason i changed my mind is because there is no evidence at all for the conspiracies but then the mainstream has written texts explaining how they did it, they have found the tools and they have plans/drawings, bills of sale to quarries. Records of transportation. Also the pyramids are actually built in cemeteries and the ancient Egyptians even say what pyramids are for in texts. The pottery found in these pyramids all date to what the mainstream claim.
So for sure the conspiracy videos are more interesting but unfortunately they are just fantasies to get us suckers to watch their videos for their own financial gain.
@@philwhatever3903 the problem is is that alot of the 'evidence' or claims made by mainstream academia either dont hold up to real world scrutiny, ignore/purposely dont address certain critical factors, and often dont actually even 'prove' what they claim they prove. The truth is is that we still dont know(and likely will never know) how, why, or even when some of these sites were constructed
the music is so loud you can't hear the man talk
Lehner 40 years ignorant mainstream academia thinking...it was well beyond the abilities of the New kingdom Egyptian masons
Yeah, because splitting a stone in two is soooo advanced it's impossible to explain how they did it...
@@Apeshaft Please explain how crude tools could drill into granite with a feed rate that we cannot match today. Please explain how 60-ton granite boxes could be hollowed out with sides exactly square and parallel, as measured by precision gauges, and the sides machined dead flat to .0002 of an inch. that's two ten thousandths, the precision of the gauge used. And inside corners with a radius equal to that of a common pencil. Give it your best shot.
@@salamanca1954 Time, manpower and the facts that people living back then were just as intelligent as we are today. And Babylonian and Sumerian mathematics that predates the Egyptian Empire were extremlly advanced. These people were no fools. Check out this short PDF:
www.math.tamu.edu/~dallen/masters/egypt_babylon/babylon.pdf
@@Apeshaft Being highly intelligent is one thing, and manpower is another, but you cannot produce obviously machined works of high precision without machine tools, and advanced metrology, to measure the results, both of which are in abundant evidence in Egypt.
Let's see hawas copper chisel just one PERFECTLY SQUARE BLOCK OF 3TONNES.
Whatever they used. It was beyond precise.
Because it wasn't directly done by human intervention
MISLEADING TITLE: They never talk about *how* the ancients cut granite blocks at all. They only discussed cutting limestone. I’d love to see them explain how they cut, shaped, and positioned 2.3 million granite blocks in 20 years. They would have had to place each block every 3 minutes for 20 years straight with no breaks 24/7 x 365.
The answer is simple; they didn't do that for 2.3 granite blocks because most of the blocks in the pyramid are limestone.
Also not sure where this 3 Minute number comes from.. Not from. Doing the math on your stated numbers for sure.
@@Dundoril You're right... it's not every 3 minutes, it's placing a block every 4.5 minutes -- 24 hours a day -- 7 days a week 365 days a year for 20 years. 2.3 million limestone and grantite blocks perfectly placed every 270 seconds. Wow. Easy. Not to mention how easy it probably was to throw together the intricacy of the 20-70 ton granite blocks kings and queens chambers -- every 270 seconds.
Also, the video still has a VERY MISLEADING TITLE: They never talk about how the ancients cut granite blocks at all. They only discussed cutting limestone.
Your point is the math I did in my head was off by 90 seconds?
@@MANUALinappropriate yes my point was that even basic math is too much for you. My other point was that you claimed it was granite wenn it was in fact limestone for basically all but a few blocks compared to the whole building
@@Dundoril The VIDEO title claimed it was granite and it's misleading. Take it up with them. If being off by 90 seconds gets you real excited and erect, then maybe the title of the video claiming to be about how the ancients cut granite blocks should have you moist as well.
@@Dundoril Plus, granite or not, YOU CAN'T CUT, QUARRY, AND PERFECTLY PLACE 2.3 million giant fucking stone blocks every 270 seconds for 20 years straight. Literally impossible.
The only way to end all the speculation on how the Great Pyramid was constructed and reveal any hidden treasures is to actually take the pyramid completely apart, block by block
And your next wish, my lord?
@@michaelg8193 haha classic
@@michaelg8193 hahahahhahahah
@@michaelg8193 hes not lord and its not a wish szobesgoj mason.
So true...but they would be very fearful to do it
Difficult to even comprehend how the Architects / Engineers
conceived the design of the pyramids with multiple chambers / passageways and calculate the load bearing
factors involved.
finaly one mentioned, the load bearing......uuuffff...and the foundations, specialy not knowing what the hell those structures were for.
This is beyond human understanding
No, its quite easy in fact, pyramid is the most primitive and stable achitecture form, nothing fancy like towers or domes where you need good grasp of how materials behave and where the load goes. Pyramid is just an organized pile of rocks, it literally cant get any simplier than that. This is the reason why this archeticture form is so widespread acros the globe.
To all the people that say egyptians built these structures 5000 years ago, please explain how such a sophisticated technology got simply lost in time. And while you do, remember that the Egyptians left no document on how they exactly built this megalithic structure. Let that sink in.
It got lost because it wasn't very practical except for building huge pyramids. Crazy expensive structure that serves no other purpose than calming the fears of a rich guy that he is going to die. And having no written trails is no wonder as well. After all it was 5000 years ago. Pyramids seem like a mistery to most of us, because we wrongly assume that most of human advance is done in the last 100 years. People 5000 years ago were as intelligent as we are now and had a great and rich civilisation, rich enough to afford to use tens of thousands of workers for decades to build a huge structure
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
Humans could not have built these.
@@johnp82 It's easy to believe that when Hollywood shows us aliens all the time (of which we'll never get first hand proof, it'll always be someone else who lives the experience, never you) or when academia tells us evolution as they believe it to be... Yes humans built them and yes, most secrets have been lost, but many were stolen and were used in modern civilizations as if brand new to us. In this day and age, it's almost impossible to tell people the reality of things since they've heard too many different conflicting theories... and online, everyone is an expert and right in their minds lol. Humans built those, but money can better be generated with an unsolved enigma so no "authority will come forward" and the money will keep rolling in the coffers ;) - this ain't news in the elite circles
@@winter_equinox1492 then explain how these humans from almost 5000 years ago moved millions of stone blocks weighing 2.5 TONS each, 481 feet in the air. That would be an incredible feat in 2022 with modern engineering and technology.
Chairs, bread and beer, eh? What a time to be alive.
You all know this is pure BS don't you? The pyrmids were absolutely not tombs.
@Ace Ventura the pyramids were underwater at one point
Then what were they, landing markers for alien spacecraft?
@@WB1200 lol you've definitely seen Stargate
@@visual7150 Na, seen way too many UFO shows :-P
I know all that stupid music and noise is.
I think it's hilarious for anyone to believe the pyramids were built by hand with no master plan...
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
If Khufu built the pyramid,why was the only sign found with his name was on a repaired part? Why was it repaired if it was just built? Being it was in the Kings chamber you would think it would be perfect.
Probably because they found the pyramid as it was then added the casing stones over it like concrete. He probably had the Sphinx re carved as well
I like how the effects are louder than the speaking. Fav part
music and sound effect is louder than his voice
They say the pyramid took 30 years to build. It would have taken them 30 years to cut one granite block in the kings chamber with the tools they had. Makes no sense.
I don't think it took 30 years to build one! They used slaves or prisoners to build pyramids.They should have enough man power to build things.
Over 2000000 stones in 30 years is 182 per day cut and moved and layed. Couldn't happen.
Why why WTF with all the loudest sound effects n CRAP music fark my black dog I am out blow it out your arse
@@scottjohnstone5551 and theres never been a single huge arsenical copper saw found, there’s absolutely no tools ever found capable of doing it. Anyone that argued they know how it was done is lying, unless theyre an elite and you offer them a child to sacrifice or something for the knowledge
I don’t think the real ancient Pyramid builders used those kind of primitive tools ⚒️
this is likely how they split the large rocks ruclips.net/video/gUtRsNm8zKM/видео.html
Literally impossible to build by hand as the human hand is imprecise
Can you turn the music down I can’t hear
It's no coincidence that everyone who claims humans made the pyramids are also unfamiliar with all the 30 or so reasons for why we could not have if the version of history we've been taught is correct. They usually just know a few of them, such as the size and precision. Those aren't even the most impressive aspects. All mainstream "explanations" ignore the majority of them.
Couldn't they have moulded the blocks in a square cast with grounded limestone and cement type mix? I see the inside is granite stone in important areas but outside appears to be limestone or am I wrong?
There was a limestone outer layer that has been cannibalized throughout the centuries to build nearby structures. Most of that is gone. What you see, the steps, are solid granite. The limestone was cut to make a flat surface from top to bottom. Some of it is still there. Check out the pics. Its quite obvious where there is limestone.
And Ive heard this cement nonsense being thrown around. If it were cement, the blocks wouldnt match the composition of the stone they were quaried from. Which is how they figured out where the blocks came from in the first place.
As simply as it can be stated, the egyptians did not build the pyramids. Similar megalithic architecture can be found all over the globe. As best as I can figure, there was a global civilization during the last ice age. Thry were advanced, amd prolific. The problem is, that most of what they left behind is under the ocean. The vast majority of our population lives on coastlines. It is highly likely that they would have followed the same ideals, as the bounty of the sea is what allowed most cultures to take root. The coastline, during the last ice age, is now thousands of feet underwater.
Misleading information. This video does not offer anything at all. Waste of time and money imo. The following link is not 100% accurate in my opinion, but the theories in there far exceeds the poor attempt of this video: ruclips.net/video/VLgVSN0V0hQ/видео.html
You're right that the innermost blocks encasing the chambers are granite while the rest of the pyramid is limestone. Whether it's true, solid limestone blocks or some poured limestone concrete is beyond my knowledge.
@Rob Arthur lets build this processing facility hundreds of miles from where the stone is quarried. Seems legit. And ive never said it was aliens. But ill guarantee you it wasnt 4th dynasty egyptians.
@Rob Arthur the stone was not quarried there. They know where it came from because they were able to match it with the stone in a quarry hundreds of miles away. For the three pyramids, that's over 5 million house sized blocks placed in a 27 year period. Thats one every 2.84 minutes.
Look up underwater megaliths. Itll blow your mind. Anyway, as best as I can tell, here was a very advanced civilization, (relatively), active during the last ice age. Most of the remains of their civilization lay under hundreds of feet of water. Why underwater? Im so glad you asked. Because a large portion of the earths water supply was trapped in the arctic ice cap. Sea level was roughly 400 feet lower than today. Most of our people live on coasts. It stands to reason that most of theirs did, as well.
I visited the great Pyramids in Egypt in 2016.To see one of the wonders of the world and how people built the pyramids.You have to be there to see and believe it.
absolutely, the gravity of the situation becomes apparent in person, i was there in the 90s, what really struck me was the culture and basic intelligence of the general populace, they are no longer a genepool that could pull this off.
Would like to see a scale model made with real copper tools that look like copper and have to be continually reformed.
6:49 when he said the words "using modern steel tools" everything you said afterwards is nonsense,
the egyptians were a very primitive bronze culture, barly out of the stoneage,
steel Vs Limestone = easy
bronze Vs lime stone is HARD!!
and that still not explains the huge amount of huge granite blocks that are used, cant cut them with bronze, it is way to soft!.
and than their are the thousands of vases, plates and pots made from all sorts of hard stone, with a hige degree of pecision that is shocking!.
all done with brone tools?? than do it!!, show us!!!.. nope.. steel tools, even in this (yet a other) fake experiment)
and they still cant explain simple math, the great pyramid is made from 3.2 million blocks of stone between 5 and 15 ton,
the egyptian experts say "the great pyramid was made in 20 years", that means 1 block was cut/ transported, lifted, and put in place every 3 minutes...
that is impossible..even with modern tools...... hahaha no!, come on !!!! come with a better explanation!!!
7:53 they just proved the great pyramid cant have been made in 20 years time!, even cheating with modern tools these modernday artisans can only do 1 tiny block of limestone 1.5 hours,
and that is not even cutting it from the bedrock OR placing it...
Easier to pay for the construction if it was done in phases instead of all at once. The Khufu phase was probably just restoring the original structure that was constructed millenia prior
copper
Ok. But what about the 50+ ton Granite blocks that are exactly perfect that won't even fit through the door ways. And where Quarried miles away???
Aswan over 300 miles away.
@@dellingson4833 agree Assouan is 500 miles away
Proof that engineers and architects before are geniuses compared to now
AMAZING ANIMATION...LOVE THIS CHANNEL
There’s no way humans built this with their hands.
Course not they use tools !duh
putting together a puzzle with missing pieces must be a mind boggling thing. even takes decades and more with more n more theories along the way.
How they worked and moved all this stonework is a huge mystery to us, but to the ancient Egyptians it was just as everyday as modern construction is to us.
They did have elephants.🤷🏽♂️
@@lSAMV31l no, they had not.
Again you have to have in mind that the Egyptians had many many workers carving those stones. We could possible say they were working almost 24hrs a day. I'm guessing which is why they finished in such a short time.
Yes they employed a large workforce. Egyptologists estimate based upon the infrastructure to house and feed the workers that the Great Pyramid likely employed ~20-30,000 workers. With that said. Most of the blocks are little more than crudely fractured chunks of stone. Very few of the total represent more carefully cut and in some cases polished blocks. So the pyramids are in truth basically "stacked rubble" surrounded by a layer of more carefully cut stone blocks to "make it look neat".
As to time. If it takes a single team of say 50 workers 2 hrs to pick up a block from the adjacent quarry about ~100-200 meters away and haul it up the ramp to dump it in place = then 10 teams can transport 10 blocks in about the same amount of time and so forth. In short the more teams working in tandem the more blocks they can place in a given span of time. The larger blocks found in the bottom half of the pyramids of course take longer while the smaller blocks above can be transported more quickly.
So depending upon the number of teams you have dictates how many blocks each team needed to move daily. The crude blocks themselves can be quickly obtained via driving a line of chisels a short distance into the limestone bedrock after which the stone will continue to split yielding approximate sized chunks which can be levered onto sleds and hauled away = or what we see.
@@varyolla435 your math is blowing my mind
They still trying to wake the idea that these were tombs..
Yep. I think this is a MOCKUMENTARY
Definitely NOT tombs...
I think the pyramids were energy sources
No mummy or treasure was ever found inside the pyramid.
@Lilnate94 Fletcher Well there is a lot of speculation on if the treasure was ever there to begin with. So we are told that the pyramids are built with such weird corridors (The shafts leading to each of the chambers are at extreme angles and once the pyramids were opened stairs had to be built to ascend and descend the corridors) in order to confuse grave robbers. However the great pyramid was not breached until 820 AD and no treasure or mummy was found inside. The entrance used today is still the one carved into the pyramid from 820 AD because the original opening was not found and opened until modern times.
So now we have the mystery of the pyramids. They were built with elaborate shafts to thwart grave robbers, but after the pyramids were finally breached (thousands of years after construction) No treasure was found to be robbed. We are told that because the grave robbing (Which there is no evidence of any entry into the pyramid before 820 AD) was so bad that the treasures and mummies were moved to the valley of the kings.
So, the grave robbery was so bad that the pyramids were built in such a way to thwart grave robbers, and the entrance was not breached until modern times, then the measures to ensure that grave robbery did not happen in the valley of the kings were the treasures and mummies were moved to must be extensive. Nope. You just need to find the entrance, dig through the cap stone, and walk right in and loot the place. The valley of the kings has been plundered by grave robbers for centuries.
So we are being lead to believe that the pyramids with their anti-theft features were abandoned with no evidence of theft in order to move the treasures and mummies to a less secure area. Oh and the only mummy ever found in what is referred to as the kings chamber was in the step pyramid and that was a later king who wanted to be associated with the kings of the past so he had his remains laid to rest in the pyramid. There is absolutely zero evidence of old kingdom pharaoh's ever being laid to rest in the pyramids.
Ladies and gentlemen: the official "fairy tale" about pyramids construction, now in 3D animation, yeah 👍
There's at least 2 million blocks. If they found, cut, placed 275 blocks a day, it would have taken 20 years. So we are told. Impossible.
They don't cut it...
They cast it one by one.
Let's build a "tomb" the most impractical way ever
That's religion for ya. Most other "theories" like electric generators or water pumps are just bonkers. It's interesting how little we really know since most accepted facts are based wholly or largely on a patchwork of clues left by a culture we know had a habit of taking credit for things done by their rivals and forebears.
If we don't start with the assumption that nobody could've been building structures much closer to the end of the last glacial period 12,000 years ago or before then the lower courses of granite facing blocks on several pyramids might suggest they were originally the walls of very large mastabas built by a culture that had iron tools before collapsing probably due to catastrophic climate change 10,000 to 12,0000 years ago only for the people of dynastic Egypt, perhaps their actual descendants, to co-opt and try to upstage the works that were already there.
If you look at some cutaway concepts of how the internal bulk of the pyramids is possibly arranged they often look like stepped mastabas of two or three large levels with more material slapped on to make a true pyramid. Not to mention even the ancient Egyptians left very few depictions of the pyramids and the ones they left are oddly inaccurate showing thinner spikes like fat obelisk looking things which might just be what roof and walls of the kings chamber was originally holding up. Who can say.
There wasn't any sign of any pharaoh or Epyptian like tomb whatsoever in the Pyramid. The Pyramids were built for something else. To think that everything ancient is only temples and tombs is crazy.
Less than 2 mins in and I'm having a headache from the sound effects. 😒
too much noise - u cant hear what the narrator is saying whats the purpose of the noise - stop the noise
and they didnt even bother to put subtitles or captions! even the automatic kind would be better than nothing
They were more advanced than us back then. They weren’t cut. The stones were manipulated with telepathy and lifted the same way. That’s why the stones fit together so tight and well. The power of the mind allowed them to manipulate the atoms in the stones and make them fit like a puzzle.
most probably you guys think telepathy is a more probable way then smelting it.
R u on drugs
😂😅 Telepathy has nothing to do with moving objects with the mind. That would be telekinetics. Regardless this is fanciful speculation especially because of all the evidence that the stones were physically moved. There is some hypothesis that the limestone could be made on site like cement to fit a specific space, but so far there is no evidence for that either.
uh wat
Levitation? Perhaps!
But look at K 2019 the great pyramid here on RUclips,
it’s quite inspired ✨
how did they sand out the saw marks to perfectly flat? the finish work would take a long time with big flat sanding tools
1974 Joseph Davidovits, a French concrete chemist, has been proposing that the pyramids and tem- ples of Old Kingdom Egypt were built of geopolymer "con- crete" poured into molds, rather than quarried blocks of limestone
🤣 Garbage in -------> Garbage out - it never grows old. So much for "internet claims" made by clickbait artists such as you noted.
@@varyolla435 You don’t understand Click bait 😜😆😂. What am I baiting you into ? you don’t even know your own words you monkey 😂😆
@@Woodman.420 🤣 Try not to trip over your own shadow and harm yourself. Perhaps a cranial helmet might help........
Moral of the story: you are a "shill" - or a 🦜 Your "researcher" = is the clickbait artist. If you can't even recognize this - I doubt anyone can help you. 🤦♂
p.s. - do not think I failed to notice how you "deflected" here to avoid addressing what I pointed out for you. Davidovits = fraudster.
@@varyolla435 you don’t get out much ? Do you ? Poor thing . Try a social life maybe 😆