Which camera do you prefer? iPhone or Sony? #iPhone13ProMaxVSSonyXperia1III #iPhone13ProMaxCamera #SonyXperia1IIICamera #iPhone13ProMax #SonyXperia1III
I dont get this...the Sony isnt made to be point and shoot. So sure...the crazy processed pictures will be great from the iphone for instant social media posting. Taking 2 mins to set the camera up in the pro apps for pictures and video pushes it miles ahead of the iphone and no artificial sharpening...but meh
@@baronofgreymatter14 That is true, but if you think of an avg consumer, they tend to go for the quick shots, but you are correct, I'm thinking of getting this phone so that I can take good photos, even if it takes some time to setup. Good review though, much helpful in understanding the differences between the cameras
@@akhilmaganti3533 this Sony phone isn't for the average consumer. So to use it as such is just moronic. Use it as it should. Get s better photographer to do the comparison is it should be done imo.
Sony’s auto mode has improved a lot!!! If they put a ultrawide with autofocus, a decent front facing camera and improve the processing for portrait mode, the 1 IV will be amazing!!
Well, the 1 IV did 2 of the 3 things you were hoping for lol, the portrait mode is still a big hit or miss but they improved the front facing camera and their processing, most notably further increasing dynamic range
Great review - not biased at all which is rare these days. I like both phones, but prefer the neutral and unsharpened look of the Xperia. 4K HDR screen is another bonus of the Xperia.
Sony xperia 1 iii is for professional cameraman and Apple products camera is only for casual use that's why we are saying that Apple is good..... Bt Sony is still beast camera phone 🔥 ever
The iPhones used to have that flat and pess contrasty look to them, which I liked, but they are making it more and more like the Samsungs and Pixels, which I don't know why the majority of people tend to prefer. So glad that Sony is keeping things organic. Shame they don't sell phones in India anymore. Would have loved to get my hands on one.
Very great comparison! Very detailed. I do think your 105mm shots are quite sharp compared to most early reviews, not sure if it's related to update or not. Sony really need to upgrade their front-facing camera, it's really annoying. Lol
What a great comparison! I do agree the shots on the iPhone 13 are oversharpened though not too much compared to Samsung. Sony needs to add multi-frame HDR video recording as most flagships have it nowadays. Stabilization wasn't great but that's probably due to the way it was mounted. Hope to see more comparisons in the future!
Excellent review. Thank you for actually using the pro mode. I think Sony's focus becomes clear when you look at the front facing camera. Sony used a 8mp samsung front facing camera and i suspect it is because photographers rarely take selfies and typically prefer to either be taking the photo or a proper group shot. Well with eye tracking you can just flip the phone around and do a classic delayed photo. I prefer the sony for the natural colors manual white balance and the more hands off approach to sharpness. Also one thing i noticed the portraits of your friend looked like unnatural skin smoothing was applied to his face on the iphone. Only thing i wish they did was add a macro camera like the s21 ultra or iphone 13.
Actually the front camera is pants as its a SAMSING ISOCELL sensor. You see back in the day Samsung were making Sony display (xperia 1 mark 1) and Samsung played a DIRTY TRICK (Typical of samsung) they FORCED Sony into a corner that if we do your display's then you MUST use our (crappy) sensors in your phones. The proof of this is that on the 1 mark 1 there is 3X4 sensors are Samsung only the ULTRAWIDE is Sony. On the 1 MK II The main and ultrawide are from Sony but telephoto and selfie are SamDung. (see where this is headed?). The 1 MK III The main sensors are all Sony but the Crappy selfie camera is an INFERIOR Samsung one (3X Sony 1x Samsung) and on the 1 IV they are ALL from Sony. So the inferior performance on the 1 iii selfie you can entirely blame Samsung for that! Proving that Samsung image sensors really are not fit for the purpose!
Although I prefer the sony with good lighting, I wish they improved their computational photography. Ik their target audience doesn't need that but I feel you don't have to cater just to the enthusiasts , they can definitely add a few extra things for regular people
In my opinion they don't really need to touch basic mode in daylight. It looks great and natural as it is, tampering with it will only create gaps going further from reality, which is what I and their target audience really like about their phones even if it means a shorter dynamic range than other devices. I just wish they'd properly develop a night mode and improve artificially lit indoors scene processing. Their phones can do the job without a night mode just fine, but it would be nice to be able to toggle a dedicated night mode for some extra edge in the darkest areas.
I'm using a pixel 6 pro and google made a great phone and cameras but to be honest for me the Xperia 1 iii still has the best cameras out there no matter what people say. I'd rather have a picture that is smooth and natural that having bright pictures and too sharp
@@shamaaaan7 it all depends on how much you want to spend I have the pixel 6 pro and it wasn't that bad and it being a newer design from Google I would consider going with it
This is the best Sony performance I've ever seen. I always hated how bad their auto-mode is, but this quality is so amazing! I like it more than iPhone!
@@istriver. Unfortunately Xperia perfected in nothing. And it's clearly shown in sales numbers. Let's be honest, flagship Xperia phones are for stubborn Sony fans only. To think that photo professionals would be interested in it is naive.
*Everything the iPhone 13 Pro Max does, the Xperia 1 Mark III does better and more beautiful, bringing more clarity of details, natural and true colors enabling more quality. It still has to be said that Xperia has its many ways to make a more complete and perfect photography with its Differential Adjustments in Manual Modes!*
You're right, but people are to busy to spend time on adjusting the settings just for a photo. That's why they prefere iphone. No headaches just pull out your phone and do a photo
All in all I really enjoy your videos and one minor thing I may suggest is to change your smartphone menu language to english (at least in your videos :D ) sometimes I want to understand what you configure but I can't read russian(not yet ;) )
Thanks) I make videos on both the Russian and the English one, and most of the time I try to change the language, but this time we were in a little hurry)
Nicely done and detailed review on comparison. Yes, in most shots I totally agree that Iphone looks a bit sharpened. Xperia has finer details so no need to be sharpened maybe because of better optics? Just look at Iphone's farthest digital zoom vs. Sony's physical one. At a viewing distance, Xperia just renders the overall color and sharpness just better with ample light.
I have the xperia 1iii and is owesome the ony thing i hate is the black captions notification on lockscreen i try to remove the captions but does not work but overall is a perfect phone from sony👍
As he said and showed in the video - if you shoot in RAW and then process the image - you have the control over digital sharpening. Or maybe you can use a 3rd party app to have a control over it
Очень детальный и наглядный обзор, спасибо! Как раз выбираю между айфоном и Сони. Хотелось бы увидеть сравнение последнего айфона с только что вышедшей Xperia pro I
Xperia 1 III is more suitable for pro photographers and videographers, especially if used as a monitor as each have been individually color-calibrated. Also the Xperia 1 III has S-Cinetone so works well as a backup cam for a7S III and future cams that have S-Cinetone.
Any decent mobile can be used by pro, if you use the camera in pro mode then you can get the photos you want and you can use lightroom later also, it doesn't worth to pay a lot for the last pro mobile if you are going to use it in pro mode. The idea of getting a last top mobile is that in auto takes pro shots for normal ppl.
Thanks) I actually don't own Xperia III, but today I'll put out a RAW photos Comparison of iPhone 13 Pro Max in Apple ProRAW vs Sony a7s III RAW in landscape, portrait and low-light photography
@@NOlimitsON a google drive link or something u mean? That'll be nice💯 I was just curious to see how close the xperia is true to the alpha picture processing
I can't wait until I get my photographer's monitor with bright white LED light hood Oh wait they only come with black plastic hoods? I thought they'd have a bright white border as that's what "photographers" seem to put around all their pictures online! ;-)
Did the author use SOLELY AUTO MODE in Xperia? Because Xperia also has SEPERATE Photo 📸 Pro and Cinema 🎦 Pro apps which contain Sony Alpha™ camera technology and this decides about quality and performance?
Next time if you want to make proper Videos on the Sony you should use the Cinema Pro App instead of the Photo Pro App since it has more options for greater video quality
After seeing this comparison i prefer a7s iii over Xperia 1 iii.. my preference just saying that Sony Xperia Smartphones just changed their camera interface & add new hardware to look professional photography but their result this year still behind the competition which really make me think that Xperia camera is not comparable to real "photography camera like a7s 111" since the comparison between 1iii VS iphone 13 Pro Max make a huge gap differences...
I love Sony competition. In both cases if buy their phones or Samsung, Apple, Oppo they're winning because they supply cameras and camera component to them. It's a business mindset
One thing i have noticed on my 5 iii AND on my 1 iii is that in video you cannot do over 24FPS over 1080p video, hdr on and have active stabiliusation onn all at the same time. You can switch off HDR and have as many fps as you wish with active stabilisation. But as soon as you enable HDR then only 24 fps is the option to have active stabilition. This might be the reason why it was shaky, as you had it on 30FPS. I tested this on Cinema and video pro and on both the 5 iii AND the 1 iii. Although both phones are freaking OOOOOOOHSOME(Awesome) :P baby! (your ERP colleague will get that joke!)
Seems a bit opinionated but these pictures are nice. iPhone for me. The “digital sharpness” still produced an overall better image. Sony portraits were yellow compared to Apple natural skin tones. Yeah iPhone. blurred the ear but Sony blurred the entire face and you still picked Sony. Overall I enjoyed the shots more than the commentary. 🙂
It doesn't matter because at the end, both Phones have Sony Sensors(which is the most important thing on a camera), Apple just decides to make more noob friendly pictures
@@alexandrostype-2211 if I’m paying $1,000+ US Dollars for a phone it does matter. I want consistency over all of the main features, in this case camera features. They have the same sensors but apple makes it more easier to use with iOS. The camera includes video and many people forget that if you add the iPhone video with any test, the iPhone has the overall better camera system. More consistent, reliable, and durable with its longevity. Apple does ALOT with on 12 megapixels and people forget that as well.
BTW the front facing camera is not even a comparison. Like I said. OVERALL I would rather pay that expensive price for the iPhone. Pro Res video is a different conversation.
Xperia in most cases better for photos, I would say. How about Xperia against your Nikon dslr. I would be interested in that and thanks for your great videos.
I bought my Xperia1iii three months ago. I use Sony Xperia for more than 10 years. I want to break this line for a new IPhone 14 pro max to test this Apple Device for One /two years. . I do not want to blindly say Sony is the best! Therefore, I would like to know why so many prefer Apple. So after this time I can safely weigh the pros and cons. But I remain determined always a Sony fan boy 😍👌
I don't like to mock around manual (pro) mode to compensate what Sony can't do in full auto and I don't like to miss the moments. So my choice would be iPhone.
It doesnt make ANY sense to compare Sony phones like you do with other phones. Sonys philosophy, especially for the Pro phones, is to give the best hardware they can and let the user do the rest. They dont focus on Software, they focus on hardware. Thats why there are special apps which allow you to handle the hardware however you like. All other companies do the opposite, they focus on the Software which accompanies the „lower hardware“. Thats why these comparison dont make any sense for Sony Pro phones. You have to adapt your reviews for that. While all other companies use the word „Pro“ as a gimmick, Sony actually aims their Pro phones to professionals. These are not phones for everyone. These are mainly for photographers or journalists, in short, for creators. You cant compare the Sony phones like you do with all others.
My mom just got herself a 13 Pro Max while I got the Xperia 1 III some weeks ago... so I got curious about general specs comparison and so on. great video!
Which camera do you prefer? iPhone or Sony?
#iPhone13ProMaxVSSonyXperia1III #iPhone13ProMaxCamera #SonyXperia1IIICamera #iPhone13ProMax #SonyXperia1III
@Haziq why?
Sony photos are mostly more to my liking (less digital sharpness and colors).
Base on this video, SONY
iPhone.
Obviously sony
People saying this review is biased should get checked, he clearly did his best to be UNbiased, he just has his own taste in photography.
Thanks bro for understanding me)) I appreciate it)
I dont get this...the Sony isnt made to be point and shoot. So sure...the crazy processed pictures will be great from the iphone for instant social media posting. Taking 2 mins to set the camera up in the pro apps for pictures and video pushes it miles ahead of the iphone and no artificial sharpening...but meh
@@baronofgreymatter14 That is true, but if you think of an avg consumer, they tend to go for the quick shots, but you are correct, I'm thinking of getting this phone so that I can take good photos, even if it takes some time to setup. Good review though, much helpful in understanding the differences between the cameras
@@akhilmaganti3533 this Sony phone isn't for the average consumer. So to use it as such is just moronic. Use it as it should. Get s better photographer to do the comparison is it should be done imo.
Xperia 1 iii looks more natural than iphone 13 pro max
It is)
Yaa,BTW,iphone uses sony’s lens in camera?Right?
But selfie camera sony suck
@@mohdsyafiq3823 selfie sony samsung sencor
That's because sony image processor shoots raw photos not edited the pictures you take. Samsung and IPhone edit if so fastly it's always edited.
Man I love that you tested RAW. You guys actually tested both phones to their best use. You deserve my subscription! Well done 👍
Thanks bro)) I appreciate it))
Sony’s auto mode has improved a lot!!! If they put a ultrawide with autofocus, a decent front facing camera and improve the processing for portrait mode, the 1 IV will be amazing!!
All Sony flagship ultra wide cameras have autofocus since few years now.
Well, the 1 IV did 2 of the 3 things you were hoping for lol, the portrait mode is still a big hit or miss but they improved the front facing camera and their processing, most notably further increasing dynamic range
The majestic function of Sony is PhotographyPro
agree
That's the comparison I was looking for. Thanks a lot. ♥️
Welcome mate) stay tuned)
Great review - not biased at all which is rare these days. I like both phones, but prefer the neutral and unsharpened look of the Xperia. 4K HDR screen is another bonus of the Xperia.
Yeah) thank you, mate) stay tuned!
Sony xperia 1 iii is for professional cameraman and Apple products camera is only for casual use that's why we are saying that Apple is good..... Bt Sony is still beast camera phone 🔥 ever
wow, I really like the images on Sony, it's more natural and less digital processing
The iPhones used to have that flat and pess contrasty look to them, which I liked, but they are making it more and more like the Samsungs and Pixels, which I don't know why the majority of people tend to prefer. So glad that Sony is keeping things organic. Shame they don't sell phones in India anymore. Would have loved to get my hands on one.
Very great comparison! Very detailed. I do think your 105mm shots are quite sharp compared to most early reviews, not sure if it's related to update or not.
Sony really need to upgrade their front-facing camera, it's really annoying. Lol
Thank you)) Stay Tuned)
What a great comparison!
I do agree the shots on the iPhone 13 are oversharpened though not too much compared to Samsung.
Sony needs to add multi-frame HDR video recording as most flagships have it nowadays. Stabilization wasn't great but that's probably due to the way it was mounted.
Hope to see more comparisons in the future!
Thank you)) stay tuned)
Both are great, just choose what you are interested in.
This video id FANTASTIC. Thank you for such a comprehensive comparison review. Cheers from Western Australia
Thanks bro! I appreciate it!
I liked the Sony's look both in video and picture. I'll go for a Sony.
Excellent review.
Thank you for actually using the pro mode.
I think Sony's focus becomes clear when you look at the front facing camera.
Sony used a 8mp samsung front facing camera and i suspect it is because photographers rarely take selfies and typically prefer to either be taking the photo or a proper group shot.
Well with eye tracking you can just flip the phone around and do a classic delayed photo.
I prefer the sony for the natural colors manual white balance and the more hands off approach to sharpness.
Also one thing i noticed the portraits of your friend looked like unnatural skin smoothing was applied to his face on the iphone.
Only thing i wish they did was add a macro camera like the s21 ultra or iphone 13.
Thank you) such a detailed comment! Stay tuned)
@@NOlimitsON just subbed the channel i like the content so far.
Any chance you will take a look at the vivo x70 pro plus?
Actually the front camera is pants as its a SAMSING ISOCELL sensor. You see back in the day Samsung were making Sony display (xperia 1 mark 1) and Samsung played a DIRTY TRICK (Typical of samsung) they FORCED Sony into a corner that if we do your display's then you MUST use our (crappy) sensors in your phones.
The proof of this is that on the 1 mark 1 there is 3X4 sensors are Samsung only the ULTRAWIDE is Sony.
On the 1 MK II The main and ultrawide are from Sony but telephoto and selfie are SamDung. (see where this is headed?).
The 1 MK III The main sensors are all Sony but the Crappy selfie camera is an INFERIOR Samsung one (3X Sony 1x Samsung)
and on the 1 IV they are ALL from Sony.
So the inferior performance on the 1 iii selfie you can entirely blame Samsung for that! Proving that Samsung image sensors really are not fit for the purpose!
One of the best comparisons of these phones I've seen!
Thanks mate)) stay tuned)
very good comparison, i'm excited for my 1 iii to arrive.
Thanks mate) stay tuned)
Although I prefer the sony with good lighting, I wish they improved their computational photography. Ik their target audience doesn't need that but I feel you don't have to cater just to the enthusiasts , they can definitely add a few extra things for regular people
In my opinion they don't really need to touch basic mode in daylight. It looks great and natural as it is, tampering with it will only create gaps going further from reality, which is what I and their target audience really like about their phones even if it means a shorter dynamic range than other devices.
I just wish they'd properly develop a night mode and improve artificially lit indoors scene processing. Their phones can do the job without a night mode just fine, but it would be nice to be able to toggle a dedicated night mode for some extra edge in the darkest areas.
I've been waiting for this
Very good comparison. Thanks
Welcome, mate, stay tuned)
I'm using a pixel 6 pro and google made a great phone and cameras but to be honest for me the Xperia 1 iii still has the best cameras out there no matter what people say. I'd rather have a picture that is smooth and natural that having bright pictures and too sharp
Hii cody. I am really confused i want the best camera phone what do you recommend for me?
@@shamaaaan7 it all depends on how much you want to spend I have the pixel 6 pro and it wasn't that bad and it being a newer design from Google I would consider going with it
Cool, best review and information. thanks!!!
Welcome, mate) stay tuned))
For some reason most reviewers compare the Sony negatively to the other flagships, and show horrible images, but you proved them all wrong. Thank you!
Welcome mate) stay tuned)
THOSE SONY PHOTOS WERE UGLY TOO :)
Thank you for this video! :) Great job!
Thank you) stay tuned)
Very nice vid guys! THnks a lot!
Welcome) stay tuned)
This is the best Sony performance I've ever seen. I always hated how bad their auto-mode is, but this quality is so amazing! I like it more than iPhone!
6:46 looked like an Album cover for your first EP. Maybe it's the colours that made it look a bit more Artsy
I can’t decide they both have their own strengths and weaknesses.
Exactly
but how many strengths and weaknesses ? :)
Xperia is perfection. IPhone is just more beautiful and thick
@@istriver. lol then why Xperia sales suck so much ?
@@istriver. Unfortunately Xperia perfected in nothing. And it's clearly shown in sales numbers. Let's be honest, flagship Xperia phones are for stubborn Sony fans only. To think that photo professionals would be interested in it is naive.
Great video THX a lot ✨💫
*Everything the iPhone 13 Pro Max does, the Xperia 1 Mark III does better and more beautiful, bringing more clarity of details, natural and true colors enabling more quality. It still has to be said that Xperia has its many ways to make a more complete and perfect photography with its Differential Adjustments in Manual Modes!*
You're right, but people are to busy to spend time on adjusting the settings just for a photo. That's why they prefere iphone. No headaches just pull out your phone and do a photo
THERE ARE NO EVEN ONE THING THAT SONY DOES BETTER THAN IPHONE
Wonder if you'll do for Xperia 1 V and 14 Pros.
All in all I really enjoy your videos and one minor thing I may suggest is to change your smartphone menu language to english (at least in your videos :D ) sometimes I want to understand what you configure but I can't read russian(not yet ;) )
Thanks) I make videos on both the Russian and the English one, and most of the time I try to change the language, but this time we were in a little hurry)
Nicely done and detailed review on comparison. Yes, in most shots I totally agree that Iphone looks a bit sharpened. Xperia has finer details so no need to be sharpened maybe because of better optics? Just look at Iphone's farthest digital zoom vs. Sony's physical one. At a viewing distance, Xperia just renders the overall color and sharpness just better with ample light.
Thank you) stay tuned)
This is the true comparison I ever seen
Once Upon A Time You Got 1 Million Subscribers 🙂🙂
Thanks, mate)) stay tuned, bro)
@@NOlimitsON ❤️❤️❤️
I have the xperia 1iii and is owesome the ony thing i hate is the black captions notification on lockscreen i try to remove the captions but does not work but overall is a perfect phone from sony👍
Amazing comparison. Thanks a lot 🙏
Welcome, stay tuned)
Good job thanks..
Plz make comparison between iPhone 13 Pro max and vivo x70 Pro +
Natural colours in Sony, and when you use camera settings,the photos are even better
Is there any way to stop or reduce digital sharpness on iPhone 13 Pro Max??
As he said and showed in the video - if you shoot in RAW and then process the image - you have the control over digital sharpening. Or maybe you can use a 3rd party app to have a control over it
Which is better to shoot hobby films for small screen like mobile laptops etc,, please tell
Love from India
I’d pick iPhone
Thanks for the review. Greetings from Poland,
Thanks mate!)) stay tuned)
I chose and ordered the iPhone 13 Pro, although recently I had Xperia 1 (mark I) and earlier Xperia XZ Premium.
in what app you took your xperia photos ?
Stock
Sony camera seems to be natural and image quality is also decent
I love sony's color and the HDR are also not too heavy on foreground
Would love to see what I believe is the best camera of 2021 vivo x70 pro plus vs Huawei p50 pro
I’ll try to find those for a test))
Great videos! Greetings from Canada!
Thank you)) warmest hugs from Russia!
Очень детальный и наглядный обзор, спасибо! Как раз выбираю между айфоном и Сони. Хотелось бы увидеть сравнение последнего айфона с только что вышедшей Xperia pro I
Думаю сделаем) спасибо)
@@NOlimitsON yes I hope too
Does sony photo pro allow users to save customisable presets?
Not sure about it…
Hope sony gain 1.5% global market share after this but Iphone was too sharp and clear. Good luck
I need info about xperia thermal issue
Nice camera comparison!
Thanks Josh!
Xperia 1 III is more suitable for pro photographers and videographers, especially if used as a monitor as each have been individually color-calibrated. Also the Xperia 1 III has S-Cinetone so works well as a backup cam for a7S III and future cams that have S-Cinetone.
Since when did Xperia have an S-Cinetone?
@@aimansyno7322 Not aure when, but a Sony ambassador on youtube with Xperia 1 II said it has it. It's most likely inside the CineAlta app.
Any decent mobile can be used by pro, if you use the camera in pro mode then you can get the photos you want and you can use lightroom later also, it doesn't worth to pay a lot for the last pro mobile if you are going to use it in pro mode.
The idea of getting a last top mobile is that in auto takes pro shots for normal ppl.
One Day...Inshallah....You Will Be Got 1 Million Subscribers.... Love From Bangladesh ❤️❤️🇧🇩🇧🇩
Thank you bro ☺️☺️☺️
I think iphone 13 microphone sound better. But I love xperia video capabilities. Any suggest for xperia external mic?
I have a lot of smartphone videos on the channel, check those out) especially the recent one
Are the sony photos on manuel or all done in expert mode ?
I really liked this comparison! can u do sony A7sIII vs sony xperia 1III RAW + edited low light, daylight and HLG edited plz!!!
Thanks) I actually don't own Xperia III, but today I'll put out a RAW photos Comparison of iPhone 13 Pro Max in Apple ProRAW vs Sony a7s III RAW in landscape, portrait and low-light photography
@@NOlimitsON a google drive link or something u mean? That'll be nice💯 I was just curious to see how close the xperia is true to the alpha picture processing
Sony 😎👌
On the portrait shots, it is good how Iphone makes the light on subject's face balanced and softer
Sony Pro mode is far better than iphone pro mode
The real pro mode is only in SONY
Is digital sharpness less visible in Apple Raw? I freaking hate the iPhone razor sharp look on some images.
It is) much better in raw
@@NOlimitsON thank you verry much))))
Is there any cod points with the phone?
Sony Xperia 1 III 😎🇨🇱🤙🔥 lo tengo y es maravilloso!! 💪
Gracias amigo))
Which is top performers
Thank you, great work.
Thanks mate)
Nice comparison. I like Sony phones, but never for the cameras on them, especially the front camera
Excellent content!!
Thank you) stay tuned))
this is unbiased review. nice one
Thanks, mate)) stay tuned)
I’ve been following your work since the release of iPhone 12 last year. Great job 👏
Thanks bro! I appreciate it! Warmest hugs from Russia!
These pictures are taken in moscow right?
Exactly))
@@NOlimitsON beautiful Moscow I've been there a bunch of times
Sony..is photographer choise.....always best sony ..in camera
I can't wait until I get my photographer's monitor with bright white LED light hood
Oh wait they only come with black plastic hoods? I thought they'd have a bright white border as that's what "photographers" seem to put around all their pictures online! ;-)
My first phone since 2006 is sony Ericsson, and after 16th year Insha Allah I buy sony 1 ii I very soon
Apple Pro Raw features are 100% supported by Photoshop for Windows?
I did all the editing in Lightroom on Mac. Can’t tell 100% for windows…
New subscriber. Great content
Thanks mate) I appreciate it)
Did the author use SOLELY AUTO MODE in Xperia? Because Xperia also has SEPERATE Photo 📸 Pro and Cinema 🎦 Pro apps which contain Sony Alpha™ camera technology and this decides about quality and performance?
Please reply, YES or NO?
It was mostly in Auto
@@NOlimitsON Thank you for being honest. That is RARE!!! 💪
Next time if you want to make proper Videos on the Sony you should use the Cinema Pro App instead of the Photo Pro App since it has more options for greater video quality
Okay mate)
Awesome comparison 👏
Thanks mate) stay tuned)
How can i tell Wich one has good detail if i watch it on 144p?
😂😂😂
After seeing this comparison i prefer a7s iii over Xperia 1 iii.. my preference just saying that Sony Xperia Smartphones just changed their camera interface & add new hardware to look professional photography but their result this year still behind the competition which really make me think that Xperia camera is not comparable to real "photography camera like a7s 111" since the comparison between 1iii VS iphone 13 Pro Max make a huge gap differences...
I'm glad to found this channel for make a good comparison! Hope this channel could reach 1M subscribers soon
Hey))) thank you, mate)) stay tuned! I really appreciate it
I love Sony competition. In both cases if buy their phones or Samsung, Apple, Oppo they're winning because they supply cameras and camera component to them. It's a business mindset
I don't know but at the 1st picture, Xperia 1 III keep the details of the wire far away while iPhone 13 pro max.. well.
Well spotted. I noticed that too :)
One thing i have noticed on my 5 iii AND on my 1 iii is that in video you cannot do over 24FPS over 1080p video, hdr on and have active stabiliusation onn all at the same time. You can switch off HDR and have as many fps as you wish with active stabilisation. But as soon as you enable HDR then only 24 fps is the option to have active stabilition. This might be the reason why it was shaky, as you had it on 30FPS. I tested this on Cinema and video pro and on both the 5 iii AND the 1 iii. Although both phones are freaking OOOOOOOHSOME(Awesome) :P baby! (your ERP colleague will get that joke!)
Could you compare iphone13 pro vs sony zv1?
I have an in-depth comparison of iPhone 12 Pro Max with Sony ZV-1, you can check it on the channel
Seems a bit opinionated but these pictures are nice. iPhone for me. The “digital sharpness” still produced an overall better image. Sony portraits were yellow compared to Apple natural skin tones. Yeah iPhone. blurred the ear but Sony blurred the entire face and you still picked Sony. Overall I enjoyed the shots more than the commentary. 🙂
Opinionated towards which side?😅
@@NOlimitsON you definitely enjoy the Sony more than apple lol.
It doesn't matter because at the end, both Phones have Sony Sensors(which is the most important thing on a camera), Apple just decides to make more noob friendly pictures
@@alexandrostype-2211 if I’m paying $1,000+ US Dollars for a phone it does matter. I want consistency over all of the main features, in this case camera features. They have the same sensors but apple makes it more easier to use with iOS. The camera includes video and many people forget that if you add the iPhone video with any test, the iPhone has the overall better camera system. More consistent, reliable, and durable with its longevity. Apple does ALOT with on 12 megapixels and people forget that as well.
BTW the front facing camera is not even a comparison. Like I said. OVERALL I would rather pay that expensive price for the iPhone. Pro Res video is a different conversation.
Xperia in most cases better for photos, I would say. How about Xperia against your Nikon dslr. I would be interested in that and thanks for your great videos.
Thanks) unfortunately I don’t own the Xperia, so it’s tough to get it for such comparison once again
Your on drugs
User iPhone can't cry after look this video.. 😄
I bought my Xperia1iii three months ago. I use Sony Xperia for more than 10 years. I want to break this line for a new IPhone 14 pro max to test this Apple Device for One /two years. . I do not want to blindly say Sony is the best! Therefore, I would like to know why so many prefer Apple.
So after this time I can safely weigh the pros and cons. But I remain determined always a Sony fan boy 😍👌
Nice plan mate) Stay tuned)
I don't like to mock around manual (pro) mode to compensate what Sony can't do in full auto and I don't like to miss the moments. So my choice would be iPhone.
How about fast moving object? Who can take it the best?
Dang, iphone videos are really nice ❤ In overall i pick the iphone..
Everything you mention is true! But it's all up to the user and a matter of taste!
Totally agree Rickard! Thanks, stay tuned)
Sony camera is better then iphone cz it's realistic capture
Iam sure you can get much better nigth shoots with the photo pro app on the Xperia 1 iii which i have . But it was a fair review not bad at all .
What Sony needs to make it a real boys camera is a built in electronic ND Filter and 5 axis stab on the Sensor :D
😅😅😅
Also an implementation of 1 inch sensor with variable aperture (blade/leaf type, not like galaxy s9/s10 type) would be 'professional'.
Variable ND filter + Variable aperture + Larger Sensor = 🔥🔥🔥
@@captainr5725 I wouldn't care about how massive the bump is if they could bring these
@Ricardo Bertuldo we need nd filter now xd
This should be like Sony vs Sony coz sensors in an iphone 13 pro are also built by sony🤭
Exactly
Sony is more on the camera side, I feel like it needs a tripod in a lot of cases especially at night because of shutter speed
It doesnt make ANY sense to compare Sony phones like you do with other phones.
Sonys philosophy, especially for the Pro phones, is to give the best hardware they can and let the user do the rest. They dont focus on Software, they focus on hardware. Thats why there are special apps which allow you to handle the hardware however you like. All other companies do the opposite, they focus on the Software which accompanies the „lower hardware“.
Thats why these comparison dont make any sense for Sony Pro phones. You have to adapt your reviews for that.
While all other companies use the word „Pro“ as a gimmick, Sony actually aims their Pro phones to professionals. These are not phones for everyone. These are mainly for photographers or journalists, in short, for creators. You cant compare the Sony phones like you do with all others.
No one want a pro phone people
Want practical put out and snap not fuck about and lose moment of pro
My mom just got herself a 13 Pro Max while I got the Xperia 1 III some weeks ago... so I got curious about general specs comparison and so on.
great video!
Thanks mate) stay tuned