Being an action star in the 90s and early 2000s was probably so much harder because of training like this, but it REALLY made the movies that much better, a lot of respect to these three
They still have very intensive training for action actors in major motion pictures now. Though I suspect they're not forcing their head to their thighs the first day after they say they can't touch their toes... Because that sounds like it could easily lead to an injury. And there's a bit more knowledge about overtraining now than there was then (and an injured actor represents a delay and costs).
@@ceceliam9014Yeah, I mean actors usually are in better condition than regular 9 to 5 folks but muscle damage can lead to liver problems or kidney failure. They could've ended in the hospital depending on how hard they pushed them. I'm not exaggerating either, I know someone who did cuz her coach pushed her too hard: Rhabdomyolysis. The muscles don't have time to heal after an intense workout and you're dehydrated, which leads to kidney failure.
@@ceceliam9014 The training they tend to do now is all physique based - gym workouts, muscle building and toning, etc. They don't do as much skill based training like the girls did for CA, or the cast of The Matrix, etc. Hence why a lot of the big action films in more recent years like the MCU use shaky cam, fast editing, and CGI face replacement FX to cover up all the stunt doubling in the fights and action scenes.
@@maxsommers6843 Yeah, I could see that being the case for the big superhero movies, for sure. And a lot of the mainstream movies that are light entertainment based. There's definitely still movies that prioritize good fight choreo though, and they'd do more skill based training. But they're a bit more niche. Though this movie may have been pretty niche with its stylized fight choreo, too, even for the time period. It was harder to hide stunt doubles at this time, but we were more accepting if seeing them. Now it sometimes seems like if we don't directly see an actor get punched in the face then we're not happy, lol. We don't like to suspend that disbelief.
Well, the audience had to be convinced that those ladies could really kick butts. The actresses put in the hard work and the audience were happy and the movie was a big hit :)
she probably didn't need as much work so would just be her doing well & the other two getting there lol as they said she was both styles ie easy to choreograph on!
Fr. In every little clip she seemed very natural and flexible, so I would've loved to have heard what she thinks helped her to be so good, like if she has a history of martial arts or dance. Instead of just the "relatable" girls, who knew nothing coming into it. Like, cool, but I bet Lucy has an interesting stories.
Some of the stunts made using wires look odd now, but the fights are still cool. And I love the training! Man I remember wishing I could be an actor just for these amazing fights scenes and trainings
martial art choreographer martial art coordinator stunt coordinator these people's role may looks the same but they are so different for many reasons. I just realised this when I watch The Fall Guy. there are so many people involved just for a scene?? we really overlook them and now I can't stop admiring these people for their artistic work
I have truly wonderful memories of these two Movies growing up. Fantastic memories. These 3 gorgeous ladies were a great part of my childhood. Such a fun experience. They really don’t make movies like this anymore.
I love to see that actors really do put in do put in the work, time and effort into doing the stunt work rather than solely rely on doubles to do it all, and just have the actors for close ups. Much respect to them
They (Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore) should do that, training to fight, more often in another or more action movies, where they're not villains or enemies. They didn't seem like this had this, training, for the failing Charlie's Angels movie.
I'm having a really hard time remembering if there was a fun girl power movie, without hating on the men, since these angels. If the newer shows were less toxic this and toxic that, girls would truly be empowered rather than hatefull.
They’re not hateful just beating toxic men’s ass. They have Boss and Charlie who are men that they get along with. Just because it’s a movie empowering women does not mean that they hate men. It’s very showing of some of the men women may encounter in our world.
@@brittanybinger3215 She's talking about recent movies like the 2019 reboot of Charlie's Angels, the Birds of Prey movie, the 2016 Ghostbusters, Captain Marvel, etc. They absolutely were toxic and man hating.
remember when female led movies could just be fun and entertaining? they weren't made to send some stupid message, these movies were great fun and both grossed a few hundred million, meanwhile the stupid serious "girl power" reboot in 2019 looked like it was going to actually lose money but eventually scraped in a meager 70mil!
Absolutely no mention that its an all female-led action movie, or any of that ESG score nonsense they parrott for EVERY movie nowadays. Just actors discussing doing stunts. The way it should be. Is anyone surprised this Charlie's Angels succeeded where the modern day ESG score reboot failed?
GFY; Charlie's Angels was absolutely recognized as an "all-female leads" show back in 1976, so much so that male execs did not want to air it because they thought no one would watch. It lasted five seasons.
@@meherenow793 That's cool of you to try and move that goalpost, but I'm commenting objectively about a video up above. My comment makes sense and applies to the video we're both commenting on. Your comment isn't reflected int eh video. Maybe go find a video talking about the subject matter you're making claims about. That would make more sense.
I think it’s because people in the industry these days are so focused on recognizing the flaws of everything and not recognizing actual amazing moments in the history of cinema that already tackled so many issues. This movie was unapologetically funny but the action was wonderful too. And yeah, the lead were women but people didn’t go see it because they were women, they went to see it for great entertainment period.
@@arystanbeck914 I was talking about the trainers, and although I agree with you to a point, an untrained man is soft and vulnerable as a baby, and a well trained female could definitely kick their ass...these girls meh...probably not...but it was a cool movie!
Why would you possibly think that matters? They’re actors. You don’t think they know they’re pretending for a fiction movie? Sounds like you need reminding of reality
![Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox 'Transformers' Behind The Scenes [+Subtitles]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sXRIjcJspAg/mqdefault.jpg)
Being an action star in the 90s and early 2000s was probably so much harder because of training like this, but it REALLY made the movies that much better, a lot of respect to these three
I would only want to be in a movie that trains you. It’s so cool
They still have very intensive training for action actors in major motion pictures now. Though I suspect they're not forcing their head to their thighs the first day after they say they can't touch their toes... Because that sounds like it could easily lead to an injury. And there's a bit more knowledge about overtraining now than there was then (and an injured actor represents a delay and costs).
@@ceceliam9014Yeah, I mean actors usually are in better condition than regular 9 to 5 folks but muscle damage can lead to liver problems or kidney failure. They could've ended in the hospital depending on how hard they pushed them.
I'm not exaggerating either, I know someone who did cuz her coach pushed her too hard: Rhabdomyolysis. The muscles don't have time to heal after an intense workout and you're dehydrated, which leads to kidney failure.
@@ceceliam9014 The training they tend to do now is all physique based - gym workouts, muscle building and toning, etc. They don't do as much skill based training like the girls did for CA, or the cast of The Matrix, etc. Hence why a lot of the big action films in more recent years like the MCU use shaky cam, fast editing, and CGI face replacement FX to cover up all the stunt doubling in the fights and action scenes.
@@maxsommers6843 Yeah, I could see that being the case for the big superhero movies, for sure. And a lot of the mainstream movies that are light entertainment based. There's definitely still movies that prioritize good fight choreo though, and they'd do more skill based training. But they're a bit more niche. Though this movie may have been pretty niche with its stylized fight choreo, too, even for the time period. It was harder to hide stunt doubles at this time, but we were more accepting if seeing them. Now it sometimes seems like if we don't directly see an actor get punched in the face then we're not happy, lol. We don't like to suspend that disbelief.
And they did it in heels! Hands down one of my favorite movies 1 and 2.
I actually liked to pause in the fight scenes to see if they were still in heels cause in most fight scenes, they switched to flats 😅
The soundtracks were amazing - bought them immediately after seeing the movies.
THEY DID IT IN HEELS
This was peak soft action. No other version has gotten even closer to what these three have achieved with Charlie's Angels. One of my favorite movies
Well, the audience had to be convinced that those ladies could really kick butts. The actresses put in the hard work and the audience were happy and the movie was a big hit :)
There wasn't enough Lucy Lui in the bts
Well she's in the thumbnail and have stolen the show already... 😉
she probably didn't need as much work so would just be her doing well & the other two getting there lol as they said she was both styles ie easy to choreograph on!
@@darkangellewso true. she has it all
Fr. In every little clip she seemed very natural and flexible, so I would've loved to have heard what she thinks helped her to be so good, like if she has a history of martial arts or dance. Instead of just the "relatable" girls, who knew nothing coming into it. Like, cool, but I bet Lucy has an interesting stories.
Agreed!
well that's why Charlie's Angels 2000 is the best!
No but like this is the type of combat style Charlie’s angels suits, not just punch and simple kicks. The art form makes them look like bad ass.
remember when Jennifer Lawrence said she was the first female lead of an action film
Lol
Ultra lol
That's comical
She said that?😭😭
Nevermind just searched😭😭as a human? Cringed as a woman?😭😭there aren’t enough holes to swallow me up
Well that's a thumbnail
2.25 reasons to be with a asian girl
So that’s what you had for lunch.
2:25
Hahahahaha true!!!
I couldn't resist
Damn, Lucy Liu ain’t playin’ around. 🫨🫨🫨
🤔 what did she even do in this video to make you single her out?
@@JadeK297The way she went down like that with no arms. Plus you could tell the power in her movements. She just looked better and stronger.
@@LadyVenVenShe likely had a gymnastics background which made learning the choreography easier.
Some of the stunts made using wires look odd now, but the fights are still cool. And I love the training!
Man I remember wishing I could be an actor just for these amazing fights scenes and trainings
We're so grateful. Things like that is making movie so enjoyable. You want to watch this over and over again. Thanks from Russia.
I couldn’t recast even in my wildest dreams!
martial art choreographer
martial art coordinator
stunt coordinator
these people's role may looks the same but they are so different for many reasons. I just realised this when I watch The Fall Guy. there are so many people involved just for a scene?? we really overlook them and now I can't stop admiring these people for their artistic work
Cameron is so stunning and gorgeous. Drew is adorable and Lucy is a cool, bad ass.
When you realize in 2024 it’s been as many years since this movie as the movie was from the debut of the show. 🤯
Drew, so glad you didn't self destruct. "And that's kicking your ass." Drew Barrymore all over the place.
they don't do it like this anymore, sadly
I would love to have another one with them as retired angels coming back to save the day.
One of my favorites to this day 🙌🏽
Never saw the movie, but now I genuinely want to.
please do.
Its so good
Totally should, good comedy/action.
You should it's really good, specially the second one
Have you seen them yet?
And that’s kicking your ass!
Interesting choice for a thumbnail.
I have truly wonderful memories of these two Movies growing up. Fantastic memories. These 3 gorgeous ladies were a great part of my childhood. Such a fun experience. They really don’t make movies like this anymore.
I watch Charlie's Angels 1 and 2 for these fight choreos, there's something about 3 hot girls who can kick arse.
The training what was missing from the reboot movie. And great acting 🙊🫠
I love to see that actors really do put in do put in the work, time and effort into doing the stunt work rather than solely rely on doubles to do it all, and just have the actors for close ups. Much respect to them
Alot of insights revealed here about learning kung fu ❤❤❤
Still one of the best action comedy films for me when I was young, they are so inspiring!
All I have to say about this movie is ...OOOOOoooooooo Barracuda😫😫🥵🥵🥵
2:24 Lucy better chill
Dream job
they worked their ass off for this movie
Lucy speaking Chinese is so cute
😂 Cameron Diaz’s neck curls…
They (Lucy Liu, Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore) should do that, training to fight, more often in another or more action movies, where they're not villains or enemies. They didn't seem like this had this, training, for the failing Charlie's Angels movie.
Lucy is mixed of the two?
oh hush dear. she's all it, she's unique, classy, gorgeous and very fit
she's gonna be the best angel
periods
McG: "I like to make movies that are all action and no plot."
they ARE the angels
Great affored this womens did, both movies where so good.
2:22 Lucy Liu 🥵🥵🥵
Where we can watch this full movie 🎥 ??
But now all actresses and actors works with a stunt-masters cause of “oh it’s must be risky to our actors if they get a injury! We’d lost money!”
2:23
So confused - Lucy is the most shinning girl out of all the cast - but where is her interview? Seriously.. wth… gosh
Why dubb the Master, just use subtitles.... And Lucy is the only one who know what he is saying...😂😂
Hollywood forgot..
Alright, guys, you know that I know why we're here, and there is no shame in it.
nice thumbnail, for the men of culture 🤣.
Well, at least it's not clickbait, here it is 2:25
2:23 you're welcome
I'm having a really hard time remembering if there was a fun girl power movie, without hating on the men, since these angels. If the newer shows were less toxic this and toxic that, girls would truly be empowered rather than hatefull.
They’re not hateful just beating toxic men’s ass. They have Boss and Charlie who are men that they get along with. Just because it’s a movie empowering women does not mean that they hate men. It’s very showing of some of the men women may encounter in our world.
@@brittanybinger3215 She's talking about recent movies like the 2019 reboot of Charlie's Angels, the Birds of Prey movie, the 2016 Ghostbusters, Captain Marvel, etc. They absolutely were toxic and man hating.
remember when female led movies could just be fun and entertaining?
they weren't made to send some stupid message, these movies were great fun and both grossed a few hundred million,
meanwhile the stupid serious "girl power" reboot in 2019 looked like it was going to actually lose money
but eventually scraped in a meager 70mil!
Oh the leisure class have such tough jobs.
Only clicked because of the thumbnail.
Absolutely no mention that its an all female-led action movie, or any of that ESG score nonsense they parrott for EVERY movie nowadays. Just actors discussing doing stunts. The way it should be.
Is anyone surprised this Charlie's Angels succeeded where the modern day ESG score reboot failed?
GFY; Charlie's Angels was absolutely recognized as an "all-female leads" show back in 1976, so much so that male execs did not want to air it because they thought no one would watch.
It lasted five seasons.
@@meherenow793 That's cool of you to try and move that goalpost, but I'm commenting objectively about a video up above. My comment makes sense and applies to the video we're both commenting on. Your comment isn't reflected int eh video. Maybe go find a video talking about the subject matter you're making claims about. That would make more sense.
do you know what this movie is based on?@@mangaas
I felt this with Kill Bill. It’s got to be a great movie to work not obvious social engineering
I think it’s because people in the industry these days are so focused on recognizing the flaws of everything and not recognizing actual amazing moments in the history of cinema that already tackled so many issues. This movie was unapologetically funny but the action was wonderful too. And yeah, the lead were women but people didn’t go see it because they were women, they went to see it for great entertainment period.
02:46 _Women being women_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I hope they didn't obtain a false belief that they can fight now. Because those kung-fu trainers never fought and can't fight themselves.
They can fight better than people with no training
@@leroilapue15 no, any man of similar size or even smaller will knock out any these girls even without any training.
@@arystanbeck914 I was talking about the trainers, and although I agree with you to a point, an untrained man is soft and vulnerable as a baby, and a well trained female could definitely kick their ass...these girls meh...probably not...but it was a cool movie!
Why would you possibly think that matters? They’re actors. You don’t think they know they’re pretending for a fiction movie? Sounds like you need reminding of reality
Do you think Keanu Reeves believes he's really John Wick IRL?
Still didn't care for the movieb
then shut up idiot
Cared enough to watch & comment though
@@kissit012exactly! He’s a loser
6:36
It’s the smell of kitty that makes the power
6:27