Russian Glide Bombs Vs American JDAM | How it Works
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 май 2024
- #ukraine #usarmy #russia
In this video, we will take a look at two glide bombs: the Soviet-era FAB 500 and the American-made JDAM smart bombs.
One of the major differences is that the American weapons when attached with a guidance tail kit converts the unguided Bomb, such as the Mark 82, into "smart" munitions weapon.
In contrast, the FAB 500, requires a guidance kit that can open its wings and fly to its target using the GLONASS, Russian guidance system.
The upgraded Fab 500 glide weapon costs around $24,000, while the J dam, costs approximately $36,000.
We’ll also take a look a look at the basic step-by-step process of the Fab 500 glide bomb works not to forget the operation of JDAMER all in the video ahead.
Instagram
/ aitelly3d
Twitter
/ aitelly3d
We make it on Blender
Download it is free and Safe
www.blender.org/download/
Peace Out
As a small channel, we encourage you to share our videos.
However, please be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
We apologize for the legal language, which arises from our experiences dealing with a lot of duplicated content.
This has been a result of big channels duplicating our Videos, ripping our original hard work, which we have created from scratch, from modeling to rigging to animation and rendering.
As a result, we've had to involve lawyers. 
Наука
Please Subscribe!
MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT "SUKHOI 34"!!!!!
Awesome 👍🏻👍🏻. Would have been nice If the vídeo told us about that Russian bombs' weird tip...
@AiTelly why is ur name the same as a Minecraft bridging method (without the "Ai")?
@@Tiagomottadmello- Pu gặp hề là tắt điện
Make video about Russia jamming US GPS weapon
Those guided FABs cost even less since there are millions of stockpiles left from 40-70 years ago, only slight refurbishment is necessary and mounting of UMPK kit and it is good to go, that is why are used so much even for small costly target as trench positons. And one more thing, there are many variants of each weight of type of bomb like ОДАБ (fuel air/thermobaric most deadly against living targets and multiple times more deadly than TNT), ЗАБ (incendiary), ФЗАБ (High explosive incendiary) and many different types, soviet engineering ain't just shovels and rocks like many people in west think, and all of these types can be used easily wth each UMPK kit as necessary, with low price.
Russians have so many FABs, on average they drop 100 to 150 bombs on Ukraine every single day, and have had a very demoralizing and damaging effect on ukrainian army
Советский подход к тому, что вооружение не должно быть "золотым" (его придерживались не всегда, но очень часто), оказался правильным. Побеждает экономика. Осознание того, что ФАБ-500 будет прилетать ОЧЕНЬ много, возможно, отрезвит ряд горячих голов в НАТО, если вздумают войти на территорию 404 официально.
@@JochenRU это верно. Взрывчатка делается с использованием толуола, а тот в свою очередь является побочным продуктом в металлургии. Почему ЧВКа НАТО стали использовать массово квадрокоптеры? Острый дефицит взрывчатки, я так предполагаю.
@@JochenRU не забывай что тот же петриот собьет твою срушку-34 еще на расстоянии 160км
поэтому ни 1 КАБ не летит на Киев, и скоро приедет еще 1 установка пак2 из германии и будет стоять в Харькове
@@JochenRU oh yeah? How’re the half a million dead boys of yours feel about that?
you forgot to mention fab 3000
That will require another video
Soon brother
Not to mention FAB-5000, the father of all FABs 😮.
Still not actually seen in action: instead there is the newly produced Drel and the UMPK version of the thermobaric ODAB and cluster RBK bombs.
The great news is instead the apparition of a completely different new family of bomb, the UMPB D-30SN .
It's seems that in this case the bomb is fully modular and could come with an jet engine for aerial use and/or with a rocket propeller allowing it to be launched from Smerch MRLS.
What I can say is that the pictures it look absolutely neat looking, very streamlined and compact, way different from the "ugly dickling" (but being the "son" of the Hellduck itself no one would care) UMPK.
Still in development but testing results are promising. Ukrainians are bout to be buried in their bunkers if the 500s are causing the 3000 will feel like an earthquake.
They have also added rocket booster to the fab 500 which drastically increases its range
Really
It's will make bomb visible for aa rocket and increase weight
@@mr.markovnik3058 they dont seem to care, they know somthing we don't
you must be talking about grom e2 and e1
i think it just applied for fab 250 now and it said to be can go around nearly 100km after deploying from aircraft. they just use to boost the bomb range while gliding, not like missile or rocket a bomb really hard to intercept (so better choice is intercept the aircraft than bomb itself).
UMPK might look rough, but resembled typical Russian methodology: simple to manufacture & maintenance, cheap to mass produce, useful it's good enough.
Exactly, JDAM looks so much more stylish, but keep in mind UMPK is basically Russia's first experience in that field
They are both bolt on systems, the us one is just a little more aerodynamic. They also both cost the same.
@@Vsor you sure they cost the same?
@@iansysoev9462 More or less, you need to take into account something called 'purchasing price parity'. Before the war, the ruble could buy around 25%-50% more than its exchange rate would suggest. Since the beginning of the war that number has become very difficult to calculate, but most of these system were made before the war anyway.
@@iansysoev9462 a difference of around 10k is really nothing, like seriously, when talking about government's wallets.
$24k is nonsense, the bomb itself costs $3k and wing kit is $1.5k, totalling $4.5k
No way its only 1.5 k ,like its price off graphic card
Thought i was the only one seeing this guy trying to make it close to american price 😂
The bomb is free inherited from Soviet union.The only new thing is the kit which likely cost $500 at best.
@@dzonikg Monthly payment for 2-bd apartments in Moscow is $700
@@xfxox $ 70 if it's your apartment
0:02 fun fact : jdam is a soviet era weapon too.
It's a Cold War Era Weapon
@@Aitelly The cold war never ended.
The west simply lost.
@@Aitelly which was when the Soviet union was still alive?
@Aitelly It's the same thing
@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 soviet era if its soviet, cold war era if its western.
The cost comparison is much more in favor of the FAB as the Russians have huge stocks of dumb bombs, so basically the incremental cost of an additonal FAB is the guidance kit. In this case, incremental cost (the cost of making one more unit) is more useful than the total full cost.
US have a lot of dumb bombs too and the JDAM is also just a guidance kit.
it's neutral i guess
America has literally millions of Mk80 bombs in storage. The cost advantage is very much in America's favor, as despite having probably a larger paper cost, the far larger, and richer American economy allows for an absolute shit ton of JDAMs to be built a year.
@@ImBigFloppa This. I wrote something about that but got deleted. Vatniks just can't grok. I wonder how many 155mm are in storage in desert ammo dumps and on pacific islands. Maybe 5 million.
@@ImBigFloppaok america is the best at everything and have the most of everything 😂
No, according to the Collective West leaders, its da Russian shovel not a glide bomb.
Ukrainian soldiers don't think so
I bet that US bomb cost 20x times more than Z's
Salaries in US are also 20x XD
не можешь
@@ctmme nope, 5x
Так и цены в США в 20 раз больше чем в РФ😂@@ctmme
Next : krasnopol vs excalibur
krasopol more of equivalent for copperhead then excalibur
"US gave up sending Ukraine $100K Excalibur shells, rarely hit targets: report"
@@RustedCroaker excalibur has been a failure so far because of gps jamming.
@@j.k.1239US has no equivalent to russian EW
@@zulfanirich7594 как и вообще ПВО, ещё против советских ракет в Ираке Пэтриоты плохо себя показывали, про бред, что они могут сбивать гиперзвуковые ракеты в Украине вообще молчите). Пускаем десятки БПЛА по Киеву, видим откуда по ним стреляют Пэтриоты, пускаем по Пэтриотам гиперзвуковой Кинжал и ракета прилетает прямо в точку. Если ваши системы не могут сбить иракские и хуситкие ракеты, то о каком гиперзвуке может идти речь.
Jdam is being jammed so there's that.
:D glonas is not drowned out and more accurate
GLONASS is nearly impossible to jam. So even if we take it for granted that GPS is more accurate, it means little if you are jammed. And a lot of Ukrainians (and Russians) claimed that JDAMs miss most of the time...
Hmmm
You can jam everything. But not everywhere and not everytime you have needed equipment.
@@deipalladium8362 Noone has been able to jam GLONASS so far. It uses dedicated russian sattelite networks
GPS kinda bit outdated compared to Beido now, but its an older system to begin with.
Is that a joke? GLONASSs reception is spotty at best, aside from that it uses virtually the same tech as GPS. If GPS can be jammed, so can GLONASS.
1:12 FAB is not only Highly Explosive
in russian: Фугасная Авиа Бомба - Highly Explosive Aircraft Bomb
Highly
For those who are interested in how to say it, its: Fugasnaya Avia Bomba
Я бы перевел как - aircraft bomb
UMPK FAB combo is far superior. They have superior range and more types of bomb options to mix and match. They are mass producing UMPK for up to FAB 3000 and are even working to get FAB 5000 UMPK rolling out soon.
In addition it is compatible with all the thermobaric equivalents of FAB series such as ODAB 1500 and more.
It has more limited launch parameters, such as 16k feet launch ceiling. It's not superior at all. They're also more inaccurate. As for being mass produced or whatever, we already have over half a million JDAMs, no reason to mass produce yet. Welcome to the 90s, when this tech became more prominent
@@apolloaero The USSR and Russia had it back then too though. They got raped with shock therapy from America so lost at least 15 years recovering. America who was unopposed for 20-25 years and had essentially unlimited resources has not gotten that much further than Russia, particularly when yo Lu factor in the military budgets. Even China who only spends 1/4 to 1/3 of what America does on military is close to catching up and will surpass the USA by 2035-2040. They came from decades behind the USA on military technology just a decade or two ago.
I have to imagine that without the complete breakup of USSR and such extreme measures by America to attack decimate Russia in the non military really the USSR or combined successor would significantly ahead of the USA at this point at the very least militarily. They would probably even be ahead of all if NATO both in terms of technology and production numbers.
America, the EU and western NATO countries have been completely imploding, especially in the lead five years. Can you imagine an Eurasian block with all the former USSR and China? By the time USSR collapsed, relations with China were on a trajectory to be where they are between China and Russia now.
Russia and China do a whole lot more than USA and NATO with a whole lot less. If NATO and “Pacific NATO” had to fight Russia and China in a conventional war they wouldn’t even have any weapons left to fight with at this point.
The west is in decline and their time is up. The future is in Asia, Africa and South America!
@@apolloaeroa 1500 kg bomb does not need to be that accurate, so your point is irrelevant.
FAB is a game changer JDAM has been proven to be irrelevant, only good at killing women and kids in Gaza(against a foe who can’t fight back).
Plus Russia is jamming Western GPS.
@@apolloaero First time I hear about 16000 feet ceiling, TBH. If this was the case, they would've been converting Su-24s en masse for UMPK use to increase their striking capabilities. Yet they only use Su-34s, which has, I think, almost twice the ceiling of Su-24 (10k-is vs 20k-is).
Makes no sense.
As for accuracy - its improving. It was used to be around 50%, and often a target would receive up to 4 bombs targeting the same area just to be sure. Now there are more and more examples of single UMPK-kitted bombs being used on a single target or entire barrage designated to several areas (like strongpoints along a trenchline) with high effect. They still seem to have worse CEP compared to JDAM, but they've markedly improved since the first introduction almost a year and a half ago. And with a new type of glider bomb being introduced recently, Russians are seem to aim at improving the accuracy even more.
You also miss a very important factor - unlike JDAM, UMPK is truly universal, just as U strands for. 3 variants for 3 bomb calibers (250, 500, 1500 kg), each able to fit practically any type of bomb in-caliber. Be it high-drag, low-drag, HE, HE-frag, thermobaric or cluster, with optional aerodynamic hood for high-drags. And technically, the kit could fit literally any bomb of said calibers, even those that are not used right now.
Simply put - it is much more versatile compared to JDAM. And its cost, given Russians mostly used old stocks, is in practice even less than stated in this video. And it requires less work to be installed.
If we discard lesser accuracy (and range on some variants), UMPK is objectively superior to JDAM-ER.
@@mauser98kar probably has to do woth logistics and existing infrastructure, and the Su-34 is probably the more survivable platform. Also, if you noticed, russia is also using low-level bomb runs. These aircraft are flying at low altitude before making a quick climb to release their payload, then quickly flare, turn back and continue to fly low. They're not flying high due to the SAM threat. All bomb and missile releases have launch parameters btw
As for accuracy, there's a reason they're focusing on the FAB-3000 and are using FAB-1500 more. It compensates for the larger CEP.
JDAM is a kit that's placed on existing bombs. They are used on Mk 82/83/84 bombs, which are all different sizes, ranging from 500 lbs to 2000 lbs. The GBU-31 uses the Mk 84, for example, a 2000 lb bomb. However, it can also use thr BLU-109, a bunker-buster. And since we don't use cluster bombs anymore, there's a version with the BLU-136, basically airburst fuze with high fragmentation. For the GBU-38, you have a version with a composite case that disintegrates when it explodes, this is a low collateral version of the 500 lb bomb. GBU-54/55/56 add laser guidance to GPS/INS guidance. As for launch parameters, they're less strict. An F-22 managed to launch a 1000 lb GBU-32 at speeds of mach 1.5 at an altitude of 50k feet, and still hit its target over 40 km away.
As you can see, the versatility is there. So no, the UMPK is not better.
Было бы интересно увидеть видео про объёмно детонирующие боеприпасы(ОДАБ или ракеты к ТОС). Само видео очень интересное. Хотелось бы добавить, что система УМПК ставится и на другие виды авиационных бомб таких как: РБК - разовая бомбовая касета(кассетная бомба), ОДАБ - объёмно детонирующая авиационная бомба(термобарическая бомба). Также видел материалы, где к бомбам с УМПК приделывают разгонные двигатели для увеличения дальности полёта.
КаССета.
Пасиб
i hate how the comments first point out your flaws in the video and cant be grateful for you quality content
Thanks for understanding
Critics will always be there some good and bad.
but this is one of the few comments that give us hope
Not when the flaw is very easy to have noted, clearly showing a urge bias. If you can't be honest about something as simple as the price, what can you be honest about?
Hello. Many thanks for your great job. Animation is truly awesome. We do hope not to meet these horrific weapon ever.
Quality content means no flaws in the video.
@@Aitelly it's impossible to make everyone happy. There will always be a group of lowlife useless oxygen wasting humans who contribute nothing while complaining at the same time
Do the ODAB-1500.
Очень опасная бомба!
FAB500 est price 300k RUB or 3200$ + 50% price of Guidance kit. about 5000$ for bomb not 25 000
I love your videos guys. Short. Easy to understand and good animations. Keep up the good work
Thanks 🙏🏻👍🏻
@@Aitellyотличная работа!
"To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing" - AiTelly
In your animation, the wings of the UMPK guidance kit are in an incorrect orientation when deployed. The rounded part of the airfoil should be at the front, and the sharp edge should be at the back of the wing.
You are right 100%
What really stunned me about UMPK is that the wings doesn't have a fancy mechanism to unfold. Rather they're held with a pyrobolt and unfold with a spring. Looked like egineering with 100% 🧠 to me 😂
everything ingenious is simple
The major difference is one costs the small change you find down the back of the couch, the other costs the GDP of a small country
Plus the expensive one does not work.
@@user-tt6il2up4o The JDAM has been in use for decades, it has a proven track record and is regarded as one of the most accurate bombs of its type.
$24k vs $36k?
Tell me again which country has a GDP of $36k?
@@WarlordEnthusiast i bet you are fun at parties
@@therealunclevanya I sure am :) Not sure how that's relevant however if all I'm doing is pointing out someone spreading misinformation.
JDAM's are getting jammed in UKR
Yes I saw a video
Ukraine has JDAM's? (I have searched it up and Ukraine infact has JDAMs however unlike FABs I have never seen them used)
@@winterinvicta ye they've been dropping jdams for a few months now
@@winterinvicta NATO is hurt themselve giving weapons to Ukraine, then captured by Russia and they make copies and search how to make them inoperative... then say Russia is losing
JDAMs are not exactly some ultra sophisticated technology. NATO nations have had them much longer than Russia, which seems to have only deployed them relatively recently, but they’ve known about it for a long time.
These are supposed to switch to inertial guidance if they detect A disruption or a problem with the GPS signal. This makes them less accurate, but when this happens, the Russian bombs have an advantage since they are larger. The larger explosive means that they are still likely to destroy their target even if they go off a little bit.
There's also a KAB-500, which is a laser guided version of that bomb, good at destroying moving targets.
Yes I read about it
KAB-500 is not the same bomb, they were a purpose designed system. Although Russia resorted to modifying unguided FAB-500s after production failed to meet demand.
In fact FAB is the Russian designation for gravity bombs. It's not actually the name of the modified bombs with UMPK glide kits. Which creates confusion, the actual name is FAB + (weight class) + (sub-variant).
@@KSmithwick1989thanks for the Indo we learned a lot today
@@KSmithwick1989 The KAB-500 is not a bomb, but a family of bombs with laser, optical and satellite guidance.
@AndreyPetroff Yes, it's the same bomb, although with a difference guidance package. The US SDB-1 follows the same concept.
Really insightful comparison! It's fascinating to see the differences in technology and strategy between the Russian glide bombs and American JDAMs. Your clear explanation helps demystify these complex weapons systems. Great work on presenting this information in an accessible way!
thanks !
Cost of Russian weapons are less so it make more effective for long war
This is so much better then Ryan Macbeth’s video talking about somebody else talking about the glide bomb.
😉 thanks 👍🏻
I haven’t watched that video but Ryan Mcbeth usually does a very good job explaining and talking about things
@@justarandomguy5993 he literally posted a youtube short about with a title that clearly implied that he going to explain what guide bombs where, then in that told me to click a link to go read/watch this video made by someone else explaining what they where. Twitch streamers do that to children.
@@veldrensavoth7119 REEEEEEEEE
Yeah. Ryan talks too much. Just another "meeting that could have been an email" kind of video.
Do you have a video on how signal jamming work? Russia is making these JDAMs into overpriced dumb bombs these days.
Not yet will do our research
Use Ai gl with jamming
s2 underground has a video on it. Though his video is more about how it practically works rather than the technicalities or science behind it.
It's simple really, GPS uses cery weak signals. So russia is using bareage jamming to mask these signals
Jamming , but it isn't as effective as said in the media, most of the jamming stations are taken out by m30a1 which uses ins
The FAB 500 knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the FAB 500 from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the FAB 500 is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the FAB 500 must also know where it was.
😌
Fab 500 weighs 500kg AND has 500kg of TNT... riiiiiiiiiiight.
That is what the Russian says on their specs
They only use the tnt weight not the overall weight.
500 это примерная масса бомбы(500+/-50 кг в зависимости от модификации), ВВ понятное дело меньше. Такая классификация как: ФАБ 100,250,500 удобна для нас, так как мы подвешиваем бомбы на держатели, которые предназаначены для определённых весовых категорий. Таким образом, по названию уже понятно, какой держатель нужен для определённой бомбы.
Its tnt equivalent. It may be RDX, which is more powerful than tnt, so 300kg of rdx is 500kg of tnt
The bomb weighs 500kg and the filling is 201kgs how hard something explodes is normally written in tnt. Just how nuke has explosive power of 1 megaton of tnt but doesnt weigh 1 megaton
Very good channel. No bullshit, no propaganda for either side, no opinion which weapon is better. Just letting the viewer form their own opinion on the subject.
It’s like a breath of fresh air.
I would like to see about the types of Russian bombs, because unlike the jdam, you can attach different types of bombs to the umpk
and I saw a video where it was shown that they began to attach an engine to the umpk
You can attack different bombs to a JDAM too, there are 15 different variants, ranging from 500lbs to 2000lbs.
Been waiting for a video on fab-500. Thank you, Aitelly!
Always Welcome!
i like content like this hopefully you can make a video about russian kornet atgm or rusian wire guided atgm
noted
FAB means Fugasnaya Avia Bomba as i know. Fugas is something using simple explosives, along with cluster and other types.
there are also UMPB D 30 SN, they are launched from the Smerch MLRS
C'est tellement bien expliqué que même un enfant pourrais comprendre. Merci pour cet effort considérable 👍🙏
Merci👍🏻
If Alien 👽 wanted to destroy mankind they simply have to wait. We are doing their work for them
The plan has been going well for thousands of years lol interstellar psyops hhhh
lame
Glide bombs with satalite guidance:
The bomb knows where it is at all times, it knows by calculating where it is and where it isn't.
Thanks for info, and the quality
Ur animation has very precise attention to details.. Like R&D drawing board.
How is it made??
Does software do it automatically or u guys have to put every details in software for it to create thousands of sub components assembling and finally making a complete PGM??
We have templates and a library of assets we created over the years. It does help us a bit
Isn't there a FAB-5000?
FAB-5000 isnt optimal for guidance kits, cant glide far
FAB - 9000
@familypowergroup in the Soviet Union nonexistent country, and were used to crush mojaheeden with their entire mountains in another nonexistent country, Democratic Republic of Afghanistan
@familypowergroup by looking at the map
Your 3D model of the airfoil for the FAB-500 are inverted.
I heard that Russian Electronic warfare works very well against jdams
it's good against GPS, which is what jdam is running on
It's now more and more photos with new UMPB D-30SN glide bombs appearing now. That's glide bombs with wing, but also with rocket buster like GLSDB but not only for MLRS but also for jets. Maybe video about this new one?
Yes, the umpb D30sn is the answer to the sdb or the small diameter bomb, this can be launched from a rocket like the Boeing glsdb, we have to remember that the glsdb was retired from the front because was susceptible to the russian gps spoofing
Even Boeing admitted GLSDB is being jammer off target by the russians, it could also be some mechanical problem with the ground launch instead of air launch like normal
@@Archer89201 There is a circumstantial evidence of that. Recently, it was used on forwardmost Russian positions in a village of Paraskovievka, north of Uhledar: a few bombs stroke and damaged a strongpoint in a building.
This is hardly a task for what is essentially an equivalent of a tactical missile. One would expect it used behind the frontline, on supply, command, artillery and AA targets. And the strongpoint hit was a very recent capture at that moment, meaning there was probably little in a way of even tactical jammers.
Its kinda fits together, innit?
500 kg is a total weight of FAB-500. Charge is something about 300 kg. Anything above it's caliber is practically useless, cause blast energy to the range is going down by square or even cube, can't catch now.
Great Feedback
This is an incorrect conclusion. Suffice it to recall that the FAB-1500 is only 675 kg of TNT. That is, it has 875 kg. fragments.
@@user-xf7tm9nq3i Dear, it's ain't no conclusion, it's a mere fact . Russians are using their so-so smart bombs as a bunker busters mostly, so it doesn't matter how much of fragments there. And only 500's are handy for air forces to use and mostover are present in quantity.
Thanks for your work
2:56 The container between the engine nacelles is not a bomb, but an additional fuel tank. It is attached to a suspension point where weapons can be attached.
T-14 Armata when?
Armata 14 is mostly prototype/concept tank in this stage. They only made a few and like any tank lot of small things will need to ba changed and improved before proper mass production if they ever do it at all. On top of that most info about it is classified/unknown
@@goranrasljic6555 Did I ask for all of that?
@@Mr.Su-35Flanker-E 🤦♂️what im trying to say they wont make a video on the vehicle that is not yet standardized and in full mass production
@@goranrasljic6555 It's your RUclips Channel
It could have already been made
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
Are the stated values the production cost or the the pricetag quoted to the army ? I really doubt UMPC costs 2/3rd of JDAM, even by just taking into account the Ruble/USD exchange rate.
Can you make a video about the Type 90 please.
We already made a Video
@@Aitelly I think you made about the T90M not the type 90 (its an japanese MBT)
The American bombs have a 5% accuracy because the Russians can block the gps, which is an interesting fact that you left out of the equation.
Great video. Apparently in response to Russian EW and GPS spoofing, the US has modified the JDAM to hone in on the source of the spoofing. Can you explain how that works?
A jammer sends a signal much like a guidance radar would. It clutters the guidance with conficting messages. Instead of being jammed, the guidance system used the source of the jamming as a target point. But that can be evaded easily by putting the jammer on and off while staying mobile.
Video suggestion: how MICLIC ( Mine Clearing Line Charge) works
You forgot to mention that JDSM doesn’t work in the Ukrainian frontline 😂😂😂
BDSM + JDAM = JDSM
There is no way the Russian kit cost 24k.
Мы на всем чем можем сэкономим
we inherited insane amount of bombs and other stuff from USSR + we are producing more stuff at the moment, so it should not be suprise that the equipment costs so little
Can you make videos on futuristic weapon that are planned or they are in process.
We need a rough blue print to model
I used to eat Fab ice Lolly's as a kid. They had chocolate sprinkles on.
Me too
Also it's worth mentioning that Su34 and UMPK FABs are a system. Su24s cannot effectively use this weapon because they can climb only up to 10 km with it, which (since it's a gravity weapon) significantly reduces the range and thus makes it unsafe for pilots. While Su34 drops these from 20 km height.
Much like Mig31 and Kinzhal, other planes cannot so effectively speed the missle up to supersonic speed before launching it. Which gives the Iskander's missile a little more oomph, like 1-1,5 km/s on top, and more range.
미국, 유럽연합, 일본 등 모든 나라의 전투기는 미사일과 포탄 투하할때 아음속 비행을 합니다.
초음속 비행 중 미사일과 포탄 투하할 경우 해당 항공기 몸체나 날개를 타격하기 때문에 세계 모든 전투기 폭격기의 공통 사항입니다
You explained so simply that you have an American education
I think you overpriced the UMPK by twice it's cost.
Но если учесть что это делают государственные предприятия с массовым производством, то возможно и еще меньше. Вообще американское ценообразование меня очень удивляет. Но с учетом того что американское военное производство полностью коррумпировано и принадлежит частным лицам то такие огромные цены на военное оборудование не должно никого удивлять. Это капитализм в самой его дикой форме. Коррупция в США настолько беспрецедентна в силу правовой легализации с использованием механизма лоббизма и подкупа, что запредельные ценники уже никого не должны удивлять.
This channel is so good
Хорошее видео!
Nice vid!
Back then every western media and every west fanboys and girls were mocking cope cage ..now cope cage on abrams😆 just saw abrams with cope cage some mins ago
❤❤Super Congratulation ❤🎉RUSSSIA FEDERATION ❤🎉
also that I myself noticed that the russian glide bombs apparently do not open their wings and over the entire time almost 80 such bombs fell on the territory of Belgorod and already destroyed 2 multi-storey buildings, the last case was that they released 2 bombs and one fell into a multi-storey building in Belgorod and the second ate flew to the border of Ukraine. Most likely there is a defect in the production of bombs, this dates back to the soviet union
The wing profiles on the fab-500 are backwards: leading and tail edges are switched.
Люблю наши ФАБы (Фугасная Авиа Бомба).
Это пример наследия советских инженеров, которое сегодня, благодаря современным технологиям, получило вторую жизнь. И теперь снова находится на страже нашей Родины
😂
The Russian government makes its own weapons. In the US, private companies manufacture weapons, at a very high price, each screw on a missile costs as if it were gold, they are very good weapons, with great technology but with a stratospheric cost.
Actually from 90s all bureaus after union collapse now private companies and ministry of defence just a main customer. For example T-90MS and Pantsir-S1 firstly was developing for export, cause companies don't have money after union collapse and only after years of selling them ministry was order them for army, same story now with Su-75, only customer for this moment is UAE. Main difference in cost of works, cause russian companies and ministry of defence not so rich so their project and products cheap compared to US ones but may have same quality
LOLLLLL are you really this dumb? You really think that those Russian "defense" companies aren't just another lynchpin in the oligarch scheme that is Russia? How much the troll farm pay you to play yourself in public like that?
Awesome 👍🏻👍🏻. Would have been nice If the vídeo todo us about that Russian bombs' weird tip...
Thanks for the video! It's not in the scope of this channel, but it would be interesting to know how many JDAMs and Russian Glibe bombs can be produces every month. Also I would like to know: is there any options to improve JDAM by installing rocket engine in order to improve range for target.
Russia can produce more, and will, because their bomb is cheaper and much less sophisticated.
Also russia uses ODAB and RBK-500 in glide kit's
What this video failed to show is their impact on the ground. The JDAM is hardly mentioned in Ukraine because it has proved very ineffective. Electronic warfare by the Russian military cause the JDAM and the HIMARS to be directed off course to land harmlessly while the Russian glide bombs has proved very devastating on the battle field. It levels huge fortifications into rubble in a matter of seconds.
Free Palestine 🇵🇸
Is it just me or does it look like your wings are facing backwards based on the cross section? The wing in your glide kit animation has the thin edge forward and the fat edge backward.
I think in fab the guidance to the target with the 2 rear control surfaces , not wings and wings opens with explosive charge cartage
the FAB 1500 is more used with the kit than the 500 since it has way more explosive mass
A small correction. FAB (ФАБ) - High Explosive Aviation Bomb (Фугасная Авиационная Бомба). It's not just High Explosive. 1:11
Useful
Glad you think so! Mohamed
Love it ♥
Gold vid!!
There is no game changer in the world that can change the battlefield with just a few dozen or hundreds of presences. Such things would only exist in Japanese anime or manga. The landscape of war changes depending on how cheaply and efficiently mass-produced weapons such as glide bombs are used in war.
0:26 does the Russian FAB500 really have the airfoil backwards?
I believe the less electronic a bomb is the more accurate ,unpredictable and more accurate
You've raised the price almost three times. The cost announced by the manufacturers of one set of UMPC (universal descent planning and correction module), with a FAB-500M-62 charge, is about 800,000 rubles, which is about $ 9,000. Where did the sum of 24,000 come from?
when the target distance is specified, is it diameter or radius?
Do about ODb -500
They are thermobaric
GMLRS Tornado-s vs Himars please
Wron, Russia also have and bomb similar to the JDAM, UMPK on the FAB's bombs its an adaptation.
You miss a detail. There is a switch in the cockpit to arm the fuse on dumb bombs
The fact you said "dumb weapon" Kinda caught me off guard, until i remember that it's just another term for unguided bombs
UMPK Glid boom Fab 500, 1000 , 1500, FAB 3000, FAB 5000 & FAB 9000
also if i'm not wrong only jdam ER is a glide bomb, the rest of the JDAMs aren't
Cool
You are forgetting that JDAM has an optional laser guidance as well as home on jam seekers
But most importantly, the JDAM can be carry a wide variety of aircraft whereas the Su-34 is the only launch platform
We did mention that in this video regarding laser guidance
@@Aitelly
Additional the JDAM has precision mine and anti ship for naval warfare as well
DON'T BE TRUE ... THE SU30 AND SU35 HAVE USE THE UPMK KITS
@@ignacio3890
Not likely
The Su-35 hasnt be used for ground attack and the Su-30 has seen limited use
@@verdebusterAP
The su35 and the su30sm had used to ground attack , the su35 was the primary sead platform.
They fly just like a 40's Stuka. Both sides have the relevand experience.
I love the animation
ФАБ-3000-тян очень ждёт своего дебюта
It surprises me that there is not a larger cost difference.