We have a BoxCaster Pro at our church and highly recommend it if you are using a pro configuration with all SDI connections, and XLR audio if not embedded. The picture quality is nicely better and the connections with SDI and XLR are more reliable. The screen makes things so easy to check on how things are going if there are any problems like we sometimes run into with the internet at our location. It also gives a quick access to control the volume of the stream so that we don't overdrive it. I realize this is much more expensive than the regular BoxCaster, but for a church that is using all SDI connections this is a no brainer as you are used to this tier of gear and quality. That said, we still love the standard BoxCaster and have it as a backup just in case, or if we need to run an event somewhere else. If you are just using HDMI connections with your cameras and switcher then the standard BoxCaster may be perfect for you.
Thank you for making this video. I switched over from Resi about a month ago and I haven’t been getting the same video quality with the standard Boxcaster than I did from the Resi service. I think I’m going to pull the trigger based on this video.
Interesting. But what of AV1 vs HEVC? Have the browser limitations of HEVC been resolved? Maybe it's no longer the issue it was a few years ago. I don't know.
Just had to get a Boxcaster because our stream has been dropping a lot (rural area). We set it to the Enhanced setting in Flow. While I won't pay $3k for the pro, I'd pay $1k for a mid-level priced encoder that would allow us to use the maxim flow setting (Boxcaster does not. Not enough memory)
We use a 2012 i7 Mac mini ($300) with Wirecast Pro ($600ish) which streams to multiple destinations with local recording and NDI feeds throughout building. Hevc included.
I’ve had pretty bad experiences with boxcast when it comes to audio metering, loudness, and preamp performance. Would not recommend. For those who are curious, at least on the unit I use every week, the xlr input metering is useless, wildly inaccurate, and will never allow you to get your mix up to -1dbfs peak loudness, clipping WAY before that - right around -15dbfs. But does that mean it’s just running at a lower gain setting and they’ll compensate for volume? Nope. It’s just a lot quieter. I took it up with support and they couldn’t tell me what metering they used, how i could possibly be clipping the preamps while sending such quiet signals, or if it was an issue they could fix. Not a pro piece of hardware IMO.
I don't understand why they are charging 10 times more. Through the use of converters, I, essentially, have the same features that the Pro has, but the cost isn't 10 times the price of the BoxCaster.
Yes. If you go with the regular Boxcaster, it's a great value since the encoder is only $400 and streaming service is $100/mo. This boxcaster pro is definitely nice but not sure it's worth it for most churches.
Hi sir hello I liked your videos very much and interesting but I want to build same small live streaming studio but I don't have background and money but I love your DJ concepts
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Jake, so glad that you gave Boxcast a try! They are SO helpful.
We have a BoxCaster Pro at our church and highly recommend it if you are using a pro configuration with all SDI connections, and XLR audio if not embedded. The picture quality is nicely better and the connections with SDI and XLR are more reliable. The screen makes things so easy to check on how things are going if there are any problems like we sometimes run into with the internet at our location. It also gives a quick access to control the volume of the stream so that we don't overdrive it. I realize this is much more expensive than the regular BoxCaster, but for a church that is using all SDI connections this is a no brainer as you are used to this tier of gear and quality. That said, we still love the standard BoxCaster and have it as a backup just in case, or if we need to run an event somewhere else. If you are just using HDMI connections with your cameras and switcher then the standard BoxCaster may be perfect for you.
Yes Boxcaster semi-pro please
Thank you for making this video. I switched over from Resi about a month ago and I haven’t been getting the same video quality with the standard Boxcaster than I did from the Resi service. I think I’m going to pull the trigger based on this video.
Just heard boxcast is running a sale on them too. Def still worth it in my opinion
We are using only one Macbook Pro 13' M1 base model with ATEM Mini) All the audio processing and video encoding is done by macbook only)
So is it a capture card? What is it??
Do you have links from a service where you used a Boxcaster and a service with the Boxcaster Pro?
How does this connect with an atem mini pro?
Interesting. But what of AV1 vs HEVC? Have the browser limitations of HEVC been resolved? Maybe it's no longer the issue it was a few years ago. I don't know.
I don't think it's an issue anymore. Seems to work fine and looks great in all browsers for us.
Just had to get a Boxcaster because our stream has been dropping a lot (rural area). We set it to the Enhanced setting in Flow. While I won't pay $3k for the pro, I'd pay $1k for a mid-level priced encoder that would allow us to use the maxim flow setting (Boxcaster does not. Not enough memory)
What boxcast plan are you paying for in this video?
Can you use this to stream to other platforms/rtmp or does it work solely with Boxcast?
We use a 2012 i7 Mac mini ($300) with Wirecast Pro ($600ish) which streams to multiple destinations with local recording and NDI feeds throughout building. Hevc included.
Jake, I’m getting a audio volume reduction going through our ATEM 1ME Production 4K. Do you find this same issue? How dod you fix?
I’ve had pretty bad experiences with boxcast when it comes to audio metering, loudness, and preamp performance. Would not recommend.
For those who are curious, at least on the unit I use every week, the xlr input metering is useless, wildly inaccurate, and will never allow you to get your mix up to -1dbfs peak loudness, clipping WAY before that - right around -15dbfs. But does that mean it’s just running at a lower gain setting and they’ll compensate for volume? Nope. It’s just a lot quieter. I took it up with support and they couldn’t tell me what metering they used, how i could possibly be clipping the preamps while sending such quiet signals, or if it was an issue they could fix. Not a pro piece of hardware IMO.
I don't understand why they are charging 10 times more. Through the use of converters, I, essentially, have the same features that the Pro has, but the cost isn't 10 times the price of the BoxCaster.
Is this a legit alternative to Resi and their live-streaming platform?
Yes. If you go with the regular Boxcaster, it's a great value since the encoder is only $400 and streaming service is $100/mo. This boxcaster pro is definitely nice but not sure it's worth it for most churches.
Hi sir hello I liked your videos very much and interesting but I want to build same small live streaming studio but I don't have background and money but I love your DJ concepts
I just use my Try-Caster to RUclips. Full 1080 P no fuss, no cost and quality is 1080p. Using a wireless ISP and send 2 mb stream up.
What model of Tricaster do you use?
@@juliekmunden tricaster Mini with 4 HDMI inputs and 4 NDI inputs from sources in the sanctuary.
Why not just use a Raspberry Pi it’s so much more cheaper
Would like to see how to setup the Raspberry Pie to do this?
@@everettnelson570 ruclips.net/video/MtETl23cnOA/видео.html
One sleeve up one sleeve down😁
I haven't had a good time with Boxcast.
how so?
My streams have been lagging and conversion from Atem mini pro to boxcast and compression of sound overall my streams have died mid service.
@@rjkora so you aren't using a boxcaster? You're streaming from the atem to boxcast over rtmp?