Dads Want Steak! Visit www.omahasteaks.com/onair93 and type WHATIF in the search bar to order the Dads Want Steak package today. With this limited time offer you’ll get 16 entrees, 4 desserts and 8 FREE Omaha Steak Burgers for just $99!
It’s crazy how we some how have the PERFECT conditions suitable for life and how the slightest change could have prevented it 😅 definitely makes you more appreciative
Not really. If is the same "I'm not alive because I'm the protagonist, I'm the protagonist because I'm alive". If the earth wasn't like this, we wouldn't even know, so in a way, this was the only thing possible
@@carlahead5072 it always bugged me how when speaking about the Goldilock zone no one talks about the atmospheric composition of the planet that may keep or shield heat
It could also fluctuate based on the type of organism living there. A silicone based orgasm could thrive on hotter planets. Methane based organisms could survive in extreme cold. These goldilock zone projections are just considering carbon based life forms. Anywhere could be habitable.
Not to mention its magnetosphere. Also it's rotation will have a huge impact. Venus, in its current orbit, is tidally locked to the sun, or nearly so, with a reversed rotation from the rest of the planets. Basically on Venus, the sun raises in the west and sets in the east, and a Venusian day and a Venusian year are about the same length of time. However, if you follow Anton Petrov's channel, he has talked about how Venus may have had liquid water on its surface as little as 10 or 20 million years ago, or something like that. Then some event triggered the runaway greenhouse conditions we see today. Probably geologic in nature, such as a massive flood basalt eruption that released too much volcanic gasses into the atmosphere or something.
It’s crazy how dangerous Jupiter is when u land on it but also it’s the most helpful planet in our solar system (other than the sun and moon) because Jupiter helps support life and takes asteroids for us
"but also it’s the most helpful planet in our solar system" you can leave it at that cause the stuff in paranthesis are not planets by any definition I'm aware of "(other than the sun and moon)"
The better question to ask is... What if Mars and Venus had always been in reversed orbits? Mars never had enough mass to hold onto an atmosphere, but Venus might have had some interesting possibilities.
This is the question. The reason Venus turned into the planet it is today has a lot to do with it being where it is closer to the Sun. In fact as the Sun heats up as it expands the Earth will find itself in a similar situation to Venus in 500 million or so years. If Venus had started off in the orbit of Mars it likely would not have developed it's current oppressive atmosphere. Mars on the other hand would, as pointed out in this video, still be out of luck still do to its weak gravity and inability to hold on to the necessary thicker atmosphere.
@@frankfowlkes7872 Venus which had always been at mars orbit might very well be almost habitable with say pressure domes. It changes the economics of space travel greatly especially if the atmosphere has a lot of co2
The distance of the habitable zone varies depending on how bright or large the star is. The smaller the star, the closer the habitable zone is to it but the bigger the star the farther the habitable zone is from it.
That will happen if the two planets swap place now. But if they were swap from the start, Venus today will be an abitable planet, because its global warming never happened. Mars, instead, will still be an inabitable planet, but a colonization will be far more easier
If Mars was Venus sized, it would likely have retained its magnetic field. Without a significant magnetic field, the solar wind was able to strip Mars of its atmosphere.
@@TwinnedBanana No. It's not the tectonic plates the problem. The problem is that Venus is closer to the Sun and it rotate too slow. If it was at the same distance of Mars when it forms, the global warming would be very slower and Venus today will be a simil-Earth planet.
The biggest problem with Mars is that it's too small with too weak gravity to hold an atmosphere that's breathable. It turns out that the single most precious resource for colonization is gravity.
Yes and no. While you're right, a planet has to be large enough to have enough gravity to hold down air, the distance from the Sun matters too. For example, if you put Earth into Mars' orbit, it'd still be a perpetual winter with ice caps covering half the planet, and thus no life could exist.
@@molotovick I've had this conversation with someone else, and let me say that at the very least it's tricky. First of all, the hottest temperature ever recorded on Mars was 95°F, and that's at the equator during the summer. The only reason that it even gets that hot is because of Mars' axial tilt, which is about 25°. This allows for seasons, which obviously includes a summer. The problem is that Earth is less tilted than Mars, being at 23.5°, so it would experience less extreme seasons, which means not as cold in the winter, but more importantly, not as warm in the summer. The next problem is that unlike Mars, Earth has a dense atmosphere that blocks out a lot of sunlight, which allows us not to heat up nearly as much. For example, although Earth and the Moon are relatively the same distance from the Sun, the max temperature on Earth is 135°F, whereas on the Moon, it's upwards of 250°F (because it doesn't have an atmosphere). So temperatures on Earth (in Mars' orbit) would be significantly cooler than Mars in Mars orbit. The last problem is distance from the Sun. Mars is much further out, and has a much more eccentric orbit. So think about what the temperatures are here on Earth in any given place, but now push us out another 30 million miles from the Sun at Mars closest approach, or another 60 million miles out at it's most distant. All of those things combined would make Earth much, much colder in Mars' orbit. That being said, could some spots on Earth get warm enough to harbor liquid water at some point in the year? Perhaps. But the bigger question is that when Earth would be at its max distance from the sun at some 150 million miles out, would it render it so cold that the planet couldn't thaw out enough to support life in its warmest days? That I don't know.
@@matthewviramontes3131 yeah It'd be really interesting because couldn't our atmosphere freeze technically? I also believe in all honesty what's happening now with us pumping loads of c02 in the atmosphere making temperatures very hot, I wonder if we could do that enough to maybe heat up the atmosphere as we wouldn't immediately freeze right? it'd probably be a process of a couple hundred days for us to freeze.
Imagine if Venus actually had life today. Would we be communicating with them and some day developing a ship that allows to travel between the planets, like we do with planes right now?
IF it could support life, there is the radiation of both worlds Van Allen belts to consider, and outer space between that would make travelling between planets on a commercial basis ridiculously expensive and very risky to ever be viable. Communication wise, it wouldn't be much different than the Internet we're used to. But with 2 minutes of lag, don't expect to have any fun online games with Venusians anytime soon.
@@abloogywoogywoo Dude, YOU are the one that introduced "Van Allen" belts existing on planets, then you're berating someone for using the very term YOU introduced as "wrong"? Are you well? Do you need to be tested for Dementia or something? As for com-lag, that would vary between 2 minutes and much longer as the planets are orbiting at different speeds and distances from the Sun, and the distance will change based on their relative positions in their respective orbital cycles. As for commercial viability, you're committing the fallacy of assuming CURRENT technology is the ALL THERE EVER WILL BE. Also the fallacy that under the circumstances of civilized live existing on a neighboring planet that both planet's civilizations wouldn't be motivated to solve the problem of commercially viable transport and travel between Earth and Venus, and that interplanetary travel wouldn't be FAR more advanced then it is in our reality. Necessity is the mother of invention. If we don't NEED something, we won't invent it.
I think between Venus and Mars, Venus would be easier to terraform if it was in Mars' orbit. But Venus does have another problem that makes it less desirable than Mars. Venus has a very long day/night cycle. At least Mars' day night cycle is only 30 minutes longer.
Venus would need us to find it a moon, as part of the terraforming process. A large enough moon would help stabilize Venus' rotation to be more normal. Venus would probably also need many asteroid bombardments to put energy into it rotating faster as well. However, the good news is apparently the upper atmosphere is more Earth like then we once thought and some sort of floating stations could possibly be sustained up there. Anton Petrov did a series of videos on this and he found, that Venus, even in its current orbit, is far more terraformable then Mars will ever be.
Venus terraforming is way harder than mars cuz we have to remove the toxic cloud and it needs a moon ofc as you say and need a ocean and it needs to be like 70 grad
@@ArkhamKnight106 Actually it is 70 degrees in the cloudtops of Venus. But keep in mind, Mars only has two small asteroids for a moon. The Toxic atmosphere also provides protection from solar radiation, so it's a double edged sword with that one, if we can find something that can withstand sulfuric acid. But like I said, you can't use solar power on the surface of a planet that has a day night cycle of 117 earth days, so finding power for the colonies would be a serious issue.
“Whether we wanted it or not, we've stepped into a war with the Cabal on *Venus.* So let's get to taking out their command, one by one. Valus Ta'aurc. From what I can gather he commands the Siege Dancers from an Imperial Land Tank outside of Rubicon. He's well protected, but with the right team, we can punch through those defenses, take this beast out, and break their grip on Freehold.”
The main obstacle to get around on Mars is to restart its convection cycle. Venus needs a large Moon to speed up its rotation and not be tidally-locked; this can sometimes help distribute weather more evenly around a planet. Also, it would spin it fast enough for its molten core to generate a magnetic field, allowing it to hold onto a more diverse range of lighter elements necessary for water and life. Mars could with this too actually.
I think a more interesting what if would be what if Mars and Venus switched places but right from the start from when they just formed and were hot newborn planets so maybe with enough time Venus could've gotten a more Earth-like atmosphere and be able to hold to it thanks to the gravity which is very similar to Earth's
Very interesting topic. I have sometimes wondered this as well, but with Titan and Mars. Or simply moving Titan/Mars into the asteroid belt to make more heat with collisions as well as adding some extra water.
I think we could live on Venus, but why? If the Earth comes to an end, it seems to me because the whole solar system will come to an end. Except for some materials and minerals, but it seems useless to me to colonize it.
@@jaybeezee24 that’s highly unlikely, Mars gravity is very weak and it’s core cooled down too quick so lack of magnetic field had its atmosphere blown away
It could be barely habitable. It would be massive enough to sustain a lighter atmosphere, similar to actual Mars. Shallow seas may exists, and microbial life could survive. On a nutshell, more oceans rides on Earth, and a place to form extraterrestial life.
If Venus didn't have such a thick atmosphere, then it would be fairly habitable in its new orbit. But with all of that atmosphere, it's still going to be hell.
Mars can’t hold an atmosphere on geological timescales, but it would take 10s or 100s of millions of years for the solar wind to strip away, which is “good enough” for people.
If one planet has perfect conditions for life, it is not a good evidence for intelligent design if other planets and moons don't have perfect conditions for life If a man saved one person from death, it is not good evidence that he is a good man, if other people are killed by him If a boxer has one win, it is not good evidence that he is a good boxer, if other his fights are losses If a man made one correct prophecy, it is not good evidence that he is a prophet, if other his prophecies are wrong
But now I’d be curious if any of the gas giants switched orbits. I know Jupiter’s gravitational force affects so much in our system so I’d be curious what would happen if Jupiter moved further away. Like what if it switched with Saturn? Or if we really wanna be extreme, what if Jupiter and Pluto switched positions?
You've forgotten that the sun could effect Mars surface. The gravity could maybe restart the core or even start to rip its crust apart opening up new volcanos. So things would be a lot different just be being closer to the sun.
What if Mars and Earth were on the same orbit trajectory and Earth was in front of Mars. But Earth was moving slightly slower (like 0.01%) slower. Would the 2 planets eventually collide or would they simply just touch and settle?
@@superkostlegend6592 that's the thing, not a collision, more like a gentle touch, I imagine earthquakes happening and mountains crumbling, but not like going through the planet
If we actually had the ability to swap orbits of planets, then we could do a lot more. 1a. Venus orbital parameters - Move to 1.2 AU - Increase rotation to 24h day - Reposition planet to be pro-grade with 25 degree axial tilt for seasons - Reduce eccentricity to 0% - Reduce inclination to 0% 1b. Venus moon - Move Europa into orbit at 1/4 of Hill Sphere maximum - pro-grade orbit with 25 degree axial tilt - Eccentricity to 0% - Inclination to 0% 1c. Venus atmosphere - Convert CO2 to hydrocarbons by using artificial photosynthesis - Convert SO2 S and O2 using sulfur scrubbers - Reduce atmospheric pressure to about 3 AU by using above methods - Eliminate or capture/remove Carbon Monoxide, Helium, Neon, Hydrogen Chloride/Fluoride - Reduce pressure further by using it to supply Mars and Mercury atmospheres - Add water for oceans (66% water coverage) from Triton and Pluto and redirected comets (see 2c and 3c below about Triton and Pluto) 1d. Venus artificial magnetosphere - solid orbital ring of permanent magnets 2a. Mars orbital parameters - Move to 1.4 AU - Increase rotation to 24h day - Reposition planet to be pro-grade with 25 degree axial tilt for seasons - Reduce eccentricity to 0% - Reduce inclination to 0% 2b. Mars moon - Move Phobos/Demios to asteroid belt - Move Tritan into orbit at 1/4 of Hill Sphere maximum - pro-grade orbit with 25 degree axial tilt - Eccentricity to 0% - Inclination to 0% 2c. Mars atmosphere - Eliminate or capture/remove Carbon Monoxide - Add water for oceans (66% water coverage) from Triton - Add gases for atmosphere from Venus 2d. Mars artificial magnetosphere - solid orbital ring of permanent magnets 3a. Mercury orbital parameters - Move to 1.6 AU - Increase rotation to 24h day - Reposition planet to be pro-grade with 25 degree axial tilt for seasons - Reduce eccentricity to 0% - Reduce inclination to 0% 3b. Mercury moon - Move Pluto into orbit at 1/4 of Hill Sphere maximum - pro-grade orbit with 25 degree axial tilt - Eccentricity to 0% - Inclination to 0% 3c. Mercury atmosphere - Eliminate or capture/remove Helium, Sodium, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium - Add water for oceans (66% water coverage) from Pluto - Add gases for atmosphere from Venus 3d. Mercury artificial magnetosphere - solid orbital ring of permanent magnets
If we're talking about mining Jupiter for a planet's worth of hydrogen, why not take some of the C02 from Venus and dump it on Mars? Getting rid of that stuff is one of the main obstacles to making Venus livable, after all. May as well put it to some use.
Instead of swapping put both of them in Earth's orbit but on opposite sides so they don't collide When there would be January on Venue it'll May on Earth and September on Mars
What if Earth and another planet shared the same orbit, but in opposite places of said orbit? Let's say, what if Venus (as is the closest in size to Earth) shared our orbit, but were in the other side, with the Sun between?
Bad. Jupiter would start to migrate inwards towards the Sun, wrecking the solar system as a result. It's only thanks to its current position and orbital resonance with Saturn can we exist, to appreciate how life can and can't form in the universe.
Maybe if Mars grew to the size of Venus, it would have remained somewhat habitable because it would have retained its magnetic field, unless something slowed down the planet's rotation like Venus. If that was the case, Mars would still be colder than Earth on average, but the Martian atmosphere would have immured enough heat to have liveable temperatures, albeit probably more like the taiga than tropical eutopia.
Have you ever been outside? Earth is not just right and this so called "habitable zone" would depend on the characteristics of the planet in question, like the composition of the atmosphere, the amount of geological activity, and it's chemistry in general. An earth like planet in this habitable zone wouldn't be so habitable if the planet was tidally locked with its host star. This could also mean that a planet much further away could be habitable given the right conditions. In fact, A tidally locked planet much further away could be habitable with the right atmosphere and maybe oceans, the heat on one side and the cold on the other could be transfered to either side through the oceans and atmosphere, evening out the temp to something life as we know it could handle. Then again, life as we know it might not be the only type of life that is possible. Some planets could develop life that is very different than us, chemically speaking, and could thrive in conditions that would kill us.
As a non-english-native person I really struggle to understand descriptions like "a hundred times less dense". Wouldn't that be basically one per cent as dense or one hundreth of the density? Or "ten times stronger" - would that mean something is ten times as strong as the original or eleven times as strong, since ten times the original amount is added to the original? English is really confusing to me sometimes.
The way that I like to think of it, a hundred times less dense is the opposite of a hundred times more. So if it’s a hundred times more and it’s sitting at 100 for example, it would now be sitting at 10,000. If it’s a hundred times less dense at 100, it’s 1. Kind of multiplication vs division.
The venusian atmosphere would slowly freeze and after a long time of cooling down, you'd get a frozen rock with a thin oxygen atmosphere, not much different than Pluto. Pluto on the other hand would just melt away and its atmosphere would be blown away by the sun, from Earth it would look like a long comet. At the end, only the silicate core would remain of what was Pluto.
It’s crazy how we some how have the PERFECT conditions suitable for life and how the slightest change could have prevented it definitely makes you more appreciative
Releasing the CO2 on Mars would be trivial, as the new, higher temperatures would cause the poles to melt. This would cause its own greenhouse effect. And oceans on Venus aren't that hard if you can get the atmosphere to cool enough to release it. Though the *concentration* of water is tiny, it must be remembered that any concentration on Venus is equivalent to ten times that concentration on Earth, so the *volume* of atmospheric water is immense. Preventing hyper acidification from absorbing the CO2 in the atmosphere is another matter though...
Mars has lots of frozen CO2 (dry ice), not only at the poles, but frozen into the ground. If it were in Venus' orbit, that dry ice would turn into CO2 gas, thickening the atmosphere and trapping more heat, which would cause more CO2 to outgas. There probably isn't enough CO2 on Mars to cause a runaway greenhouse effect and create a second Venus, so the ultimate result would probably be to create a Mars that is closer to being inhabitable than it is now.
What If you pay for RUclips Premium and the content creator would have enough respect for its audience to not insert ads, at least not at the beginning of the video.
The best way to create another earth is to smash Mars into Venus. Earth was also hit by a Mars size body and it formed the moon and stabilised earth. MaVenus could be a second earth in a billion years.
If Venus and Mars swapped orbits, it would have a significant impact on the solar system. The positions and orbits of the planets in the solar system are determined by their mass and distance from the sun, and any change in these factors would have a ripple effect on the rest of the solar system. One of the most significant impacts would be on the potential habitability of both Venus and Mars. Venus is currently too close to the sun to support life, while Mars is too cold and dry. If Venus were to move to Mars' orbit, it would become much colder and would likely lose its thick atmosphere. Mars, on the other hand, would be much closer to the sun if it were in Venus' orbit, and it would receive much more sunlight and warmth. This would make it much more hospitable for life. The swap would also have an impact on the orbits and climates of the other planets in the solar system. For example, Earth would be much closer to the sun, which would have a significant impact on its climate and weather patterns. Overall, while it is an interesting thought experiment, it's important to note that the chances of this happening in reality are practically impossible, as the gravitational forces and the energy required to change the orbits of these planets are immense.
It would be a lot easier the leave the planets where they are and harvest Venus's CO2 and transport it to Mars....if you moved about 50% of Venus's CO2 to Mars, they might both be able to be terraformed at that point...
Mars isn’t actually too far, it’s in the Goldilocks zone, however it cannot maintain heat due to its thin atmesosphere, making it extremely cold, and it has no magnesosphere
Dads Want Steak! Visit www.omahasteaks.com/onair93 and type WHATIF in the search bar to order the Dads Want Steak package today. With this limited time offer you’ll get 16 entrees, 4 desserts and 8 FREE Omaha Steak Burgers for just $99!
@Whyvern there is such an episode already
What if united states was an floating island👀
How about what if venus had a moon 🌙or if we gave it a moon 🌙
You lost me at omaha steaks 🤤😆
what is?
It’s crazy how we some how have the PERFECT conditions suitable for life and how the slightest change could have prevented it 😅 definitely makes you more appreciative
Not really. If is the same "I'm not alive because I'm the protagonist, I'm the protagonist because I'm alive".
If the earth wasn't like this, we wouldn't even know, so in a way, this was the only thing possible
Suitable for humans*
We could be alive as a different species
"makes you more appreciative", you wouldn't even know if it went any other way xD
What’s more crazy is how you ain’t my wife 😁
So steaks?😂
Venus:Mars can we switch it's too hot here
Mars:Yea mine is too cold
*swapped Position*
Venus and Mars:...
Venus and Mars: Hey Earth! Wanna swap?
@@jl7655 Earth: I can't, but they can!
Humans:
*Solar system 4.5 billion years ago*
Mars:Omg I have water
Venus:Me too
Earth:I don't have waters I only have lavas
@@bug2843 Mars: hey Jupiter, wanna have some of my Atmosphere?
Jupiter: I'm sorry, what?
What this also shows is the Goldilock zone can vary depending on star temperature, planetary orbit and atmospheric composition.
That’s exactly right and I couldn’t agree more !! All of those factors play into a planets habitable zone.
@@carlahead5072 it always bugged me how when speaking about the Goldilock zone no one talks about the atmospheric composition of the planet that may keep or shield heat
It could also fluctuate based on the type of organism living there. A silicone based orgasm could thrive on hotter planets. Methane based organisms could survive in extreme cold. These goldilock zone projections are just considering carbon based life forms. Anywhere could be habitable.
Yes and the magnetic field of the planet that shields against the solar wind, and also a day and night cycle that balances out the temperature evenly.
Not to mention its magnetosphere. Also it's rotation will have a huge impact. Venus, in its current orbit, is tidally locked to the sun, or nearly so, with a reversed rotation from the rest of the planets. Basically on Venus, the sun raises in the west and sets in the east, and a Venusian day and a Venusian year are about the same length of time.
However, if you follow Anton Petrov's channel, he has talked about how Venus may have had liquid water on its surface as little as 10 or 20 million years ago, or something like that. Then some event triggered the runaway greenhouse conditions we see today. Probably geologic in nature, such as a massive flood basalt eruption that released too much volcanic gasses into the atmosphere or something.
It’s crazy how dangerous Jupiter is when u land on it but also it’s the most helpful planet in our solar system (other than the sun and moon) because Jupiter helps support life and takes asteroids for us
"but also it’s the most helpful planet in our solar system" you can leave it at that cause the stuff in paranthesis are not planets by any definition I'm aware of "(other than the sun and moon)"
@@BushidoBrownSama I think he meant 'object' instead of "planet"
@@DendrocnideMoroides that would work
You can't land on a gas giant. You'd be fried by its radiation, obliterated by the wind speeds, suffocated by the gases, and crushed by its gravity.
Jupiter does more than take asteroids for us. It also sends asteroids towards us. It's a double edged sword for Jupiter.
The better question to ask is... What if Mars and Venus had always been in reversed orbits? Mars never had enough mass to hold onto an atmosphere, but Venus might have had some interesting possibilities.
This is the question. The reason Venus turned into the planet it is today has a lot to do with it being where it is closer to the Sun. In fact as the Sun heats up as it expands the Earth will find itself in a similar situation to Venus in 500 million or so years. If Venus had started off in the orbit of Mars it likely would not have developed it's current oppressive atmosphere. Mars on the other hand would, as pointed out in this video, still be out of luck still do to its weak gravity and inability to hold on to the necessary thicker atmosphere.
@@frankfowlkes7872 Venus which had always been at mars orbit might very well be almost habitable with say pressure domes. It changes the economics of space travel greatly especially if the atmosphere has a lot of co2
The distance of the habitable zone varies depending on how bright or large the star is. The smaller the star, the closer the habitable zone is to it but the bigger the star the farther the habitable zone is from it.
But being closer to the star, makes it Tidally locked.. Thereby minimizing chances of survival
That will happen if the two planets swap place now. But if they were swap from the start, Venus today will be an abitable planet, because its global warming never happened. Mars, instead, will still be an inabitable planet, but a colonization will be far more easier
If Mars was Venus sized, it would likely have retained its magnetic field. Without a significant magnetic field, the solar wind was able to strip Mars of its atmosphere.
Interesting thought.
@@WhatIfScienceShow then make a video about it
It's global warming was because it never formed Plate Tectonics. Nothing would have really changed with Venus.
@@TwinnedBanana No. It's not the tectonic plates the problem. The problem is that Venus is closer to the Sun and it rotate too slow. If it was at the same distance of Mars when it forms, the global warming would be very slower and Venus today will be a simil-Earth planet.
The biggest problem with Mars is that it's too small with too weak gravity to hold an atmosphere that's breathable. It turns out that the single most precious resource for colonization is gravity.
Yes and no. While you're right, a planet has to be large enough to have enough gravity to hold down air, the distance from the Sun matters too. For example, if you put Earth into Mars' orbit, it'd still be a perpetual winter with ice caps covering half the planet, and thus no life could exist.
@@matthewviramontes3131 our climate would definitely change but I wouldn't say our planet would be uninhabitable if it switched places
@@molotovick I've had this conversation with someone else, and let me say that at the very least it's tricky. First of all, the hottest temperature ever recorded on Mars was 95°F, and that's at the equator during the summer. The only reason that it even gets that hot is because of Mars' axial tilt, which is about 25°. This allows for seasons, which obviously includes a summer. The problem is that Earth is less tilted than Mars, being at 23.5°, so it would experience less extreme seasons, which means not as cold in the winter, but more importantly, not as warm in the summer. The next problem is that unlike Mars, Earth has a dense atmosphere that blocks out a lot of sunlight, which allows us not to heat up nearly as much. For example, although Earth and the Moon are relatively the same distance from the Sun, the max temperature on Earth is 135°F, whereas on the Moon, it's upwards of 250°F (because it doesn't have an atmosphere). So temperatures on Earth (in Mars' orbit) would be significantly cooler than Mars in Mars orbit. The last problem is distance from the Sun. Mars is much further out, and has a much more eccentric orbit. So think about what the temperatures are here on Earth in any given place, but now push us out another 30 million miles from the Sun at Mars closest approach, or another 60 million miles out at it's most distant. All of those things combined would make Earth much, much colder in Mars' orbit. That being said, could some spots on Earth get warm enough to harbor liquid water at some point in the year? Perhaps. But the bigger question is that when Earth would be at its max distance from the sun at some 150 million miles out, would it render it so cold that the planet couldn't thaw out enough to support life in its warmest days? That I don't know.
@@matthewviramontes3131 yeah It'd be really interesting because couldn't our atmosphere freeze technically? I also believe in all honesty what's happening now with us pumping loads of c02 in the atmosphere making temperatures very hot, I wonder if we could do that enough to maybe heat up the atmosphere as we wouldn't immediately freeze right? it'd probably be a process of a couple hundred days for us to freeze.
Imagine if Venus actually had life today. Would we be communicating with them and some day developing a ship that allows to travel between the planets, like we do with planes right now?
IF it could support life, there is the radiation of both worlds Van Allen belts to consider, and outer space between that would make travelling between planets on a commercial basis ridiculously expensive and very risky to ever be viable. Communication wise, it wouldn't be much different than the Internet we're used to. But with 2 minutes of lag, don't expect to have any fun online games with Venusians anytime soon.
We'd be at war with them to take their resources. We would probably end up blowing each other away.
why would venus call theirs van allen?
theyd have their own name for it.
@@citizenstranger Planet doesn't have one. If they did - welcome to science fiction. There is no wrong name in your fictional universe. :)
@@abloogywoogywoo Dude, YOU are the one that introduced "Van Allen" belts existing on planets, then you're berating someone for using the very term YOU introduced as "wrong"? Are you well? Do you need to be tested for Dementia or something?
As for com-lag, that would vary between 2 minutes and much longer as the planets are orbiting at different speeds and distances from the Sun, and the distance will change based on their relative positions in their respective orbital cycles.
As for commercial viability, you're committing the fallacy of assuming CURRENT technology is the ALL THERE EVER WILL BE. Also the fallacy that under the circumstances of civilized live existing on a neighboring planet that both planet's civilizations wouldn't be motivated to solve the problem of commercially viable transport and travel between Earth and Venus, and that interplanetary travel wouldn't be FAR more advanced then it is in our reality. Necessity is the mother of invention. If we don't NEED something, we won't invent it.
Thank you What If for trying to create life instead of destroying it
Thank you for your comment!
Thank you for the great video again!
Thank you, we appreciate your support! Stay tuned for more. 🙂
I think between Venus and Mars, Venus would be easier to terraform if it was in Mars' orbit. But Venus does have another problem that makes it less desirable than Mars. Venus has a very long day/night cycle. At least Mars' day night cycle is only 30 minutes longer.
Venus would need us to find it a moon, as part of the terraforming process. A large enough moon would help stabilize Venus' rotation to be more normal. Venus would probably also need many asteroid bombardments to put energy into it rotating faster as well. However, the good news is apparently the upper atmosphere is more Earth like then we once thought and some sort of floating stations could possibly be sustained up there. Anton Petrov did a series of videos on this and he found, that Venus, even in its current orbit, is far more terraformable then Mars will ever be.
Venus terraforming is way harder than mars cuz we have to remove the toxic cloud and it needs a moon ofc as you say and need a ocean and it needs to be like 70 grad
@@Seriously_Unserious and the acid rain volcanoes
@@ArkhamKnight106 Actually it is 70 degrees in the cloudtops of Venus. But keep in mind, Mars only has two small asteroids for a moon. The Toxic atmosphere also provides protection from solar radiation, so it's a double edged sword with that one, if we can find something that can withstand sulfuric acid. But like I said, you can't use solar power on the surface of a planet that has a day night cycle of 117 earth days, so finding power for the colonies would be a serious issue.
@@JoseMolina-ij3xx Deimos and Phobos could grow bigger if mars didn’t exist.
“Whether we wanted it or not, we've stepped into a war with the Cabal on *Venus.* So let's get to taking out their command, one by one. Valus Ta'aurc. From what I can gather he commands the Siege Dancers from an Imperial Land Tank outside of Rubicon. He's well protected, but with the right team, we can punch through those defenses, take this beast out, and break their grip on Freehold.”
U talking destiny? I haven’t played in like a month or two lol
Finally I’ve been wanting this video for ages
Thanks for watching, stay tuned for more! 🙂
I’m waiting for the Mars and Mercury fusión episode.
@@WhatIfScienceShow will do
Very good content!!!
Thanks!
The main obstacle to get around on Mars is to restart its convection cycle. Venus needs a large Moon to speed up its rotation and not be tidally-locked; this can sometimes help distribute weather more evenly around a planet. Also, it would spin it fast enough for its molten core to generate a magnetic field, allowing it to hold onto a more diverse range of lighter elements necessary for water and life. Mars could with this too actually.
Love what if , I always click immediately to watch
Thank you for your support!
I think a more interesting what if would be what if Mars and Venus switched places but right from the start from when they just formed and were hot newborn planets so maybe with enough time Venus could've gotten a more Earth-like atmosphere and be able to hold to it thanks to the gravity which is very similar to Earth's
Yeah thats what i was thinking about
Yea that's what I want to see as well.
Very interesting topic. I have sometimes wondered this as well, but with Titan and Mars. Or simply moving Titan/Mars into the asteroid belt to make more heat with collisions as well as adding some extra water.
Love what if videos
I think we could live on Venus, but why? If the Earth comes to an end, it seems to me because the whole solar system will come to an end. Except for some materials and minerals, but it seems useless to me to colonize it.
Ola
I think u are right
superoo
I am not sure about that. But I sure about ur videos😍
I disagree
That ad of steak was so amazing! I had to watch it multiple time! 😁
What if Mars was Earth's moon instead of our current Moon?
Check The Video where He put all planets in place of the moon
A much stronger gravitational pull for sure, our oceanic waves would be much higher and rotation would slow down more
Heard mars once had life they destroyed the planet like we are doing
@@jaybeezee24 that’s highly unlikely, Mars gravity is very weak and it’s core cooled down too quick so lack of magnetic field had its atmosphere blown away
It could be barely habitable. It would be massive enough to sustain a lighter atmosphere, similar to actual Mars. Shallow seas may exists, and microbial life could survive. On a nutshell, more oceans rides on Earth, and a place to form extraterrestial life.
I just want every human to be aware of the gift they have (only life supporting planet in solar system), and try not to destroy it.
If Venus and Mars swapped places, Mars would 32°C and Venus would be 7°C.
If Venus didn't have such a thick atmosphere, then it would be fairly habitable in its new orbit. But with all of that atmosphere, it's still going to be hell.
EARLY LETS GO LOVE ALL YOUR VIDS!
These visuals are insane though!
Thank you! 🙂
@@WhatIfScienceShow You're welcome! Love it. 😊
Mars can’t hold an atmosphere on geological timescales, but it would take 10s or 100s of millions of years for the solar wind to strip away, which is “good enough” for people.
We can transport some of the carbon dioxide to Mars. This will also help us with Global Warming.
This video has been Omaha approved!
Perfect conditions for life, undeniable evidence of intelligent design.
If one planet has perfect conditions for life, it is not a good evidence for intelligent design if other planets and moons don't have perfect conditions for life
If a man saved one person from death, it is not good evidence that he is a good man, if other people are killed by him
If a boxer has one win, it is not good evidence that he is a good boxer, if other his fights are losses
If a man made one correct prophecy, it is not good evidence that he is a prophet, if other his prophecies are wrong
But now I’d be curious if any of the gas giants switched orbits. I know Jupiter’s gravitational force affects so much in our system so I’d be curious what would happen if Jupiter moved further away. Like what if it switched with Saturn? Or if we really wanna be extreme, what if Jupiter and Pluto switched positions?
Jupiter and Pluto ya that in so crazy
What if all of our solar systems planets were in reverse order; the moons included
That's an interesting idea, thank you for sharing it with us.
We’d be dead and Pluto would be hot
Titan would be habitable zone, but it migt lose its atmosphere like Mars did due to low gravity
$200 for a pack if steak, I'm just gonna take my dad to a restaurant instead in father day
Lol
You've forgotten that the sun could effect Mars surface. The gravity could maybe restart the core or even start to rip its crust apart opening up new volcanos. So things would be a lot different just be being closer to the sun.
Oh my Freeznus!
What if we could move Ceres close to Mars and use it as a moon?
U made THIS I'M SO EXCITED I JUST LOVE SPACE STUFF
12 views and 38 likes????????
Weird
What if venus shared the same orbit as earth but on the opposite side of the sun
Ooo that’s a good one!
Then we'd get another Theia catastrophe waiting to happen.
nice thought I wondered the same ideas my seft, seeing the title, interesting one fella
I just love your channel.
Could you make a video on what if galilean moons comes in habitable zone (as planets) without jupiter.
It's crazy no one realizes that this guy is just showing us "a thousand ways to die"
One of the best shows on Spike.
What if Mars and Earth were on the same orbit trajectory and Earth was in front of Mars. But Earth was moving slightly slower (like 0.01%) slower. Would the 2 planets eventually collide or would they simply just touch and settle?
Depends on how slow
earth would tear apart mars, and mars would destroy life on earth with the colision ( either from falling debris, or mars crashes on earth)
@@sandasturner9529 like so slow that you can touch it above you
@@superkostlegend6592 that's the thing, not a collision, more like a gentle touch, I imagine earthquakes happening and mountains crumbling, but not like going through the planet
roche limit, thats your answer
The solar system would look completely different
If we actually had the ability to swap orbits of planets, then we could do a lot more.
1a. Venus orbital parameters
- Move to 1.2 AU
- Increase rotation to 24h day
- Reposition planet to be pro-grade with 25 degree axial tilt for seasons
- Reduce eccentricity to 0%
- Reduce inclination to 0%
1b. Venus moon
- Move Europa into orbit at 1/4 of Hill Sphere maximum
- pro-grade orbit with 25 degree axial tilt
- Eccentricity to 0%
- Inclination to 0%
1c. Venus atmosphere
- Convert CO2 to hydrocarbons by using artificial photosynthesis
- Convert SO2 S and O2 using sulfur scrubbers
- Reduce atmospheric pressure to about 3 AU by using above methods
- Eliminate or capture/remove Carbon Monoxide, Helium, Neon, Hydrogen Chloride/Fluoride
- Reduce pressure further by using it to supply Mars and Mercury atmospheres
- Add water for oceans (66% water coverage) from Triton and Pluto and redirected comets (see 2c and 3c below about Triton and Pluto)
1d. Venus artificial magnetosphere
- solid orbital ring of permanent magnets
2a. Mars orbital parameters
- Move to 1.4 AU
- Increase rotation to 24h day
- Reposition planet to be pro-grade with 25 degree axial tilt for seasons
- Reduce eccentricity to 0%
- Reduce inclination to 0%
2b. Mars moon
- Move Phobos/Demios to asteroid belt
- Move Tritan into orbit at 1/4 of Hill Sphere maximum
- pro-grade orbit with 25 degree axial tilt
- Eccentricity to 0%
- Inclination to 0%
2c. Mars atmosphere
- Eliminate or capture/remove Carbon Monoxide
- Add water for oceans (66% water coverage) from Triton
- Add gases for atmosphere from Venus
2d. Mars artificial magnetosphere
- solid orbital ring of permanent magnets
3a. Mercury orbital parameters
- Move to 1.6 AU
- Increase rotation to 24h day
- Reposition planet to be pro-grade with 25 degree axial tilt for seasons
- Reduce eccentricity to 0%
- Reduce inclination to 0%
3b. Mercury moon
- Move Pluto into orbit at 1/4 of Hill Sphere maximum
- pro-grade orbit with 25 degree axial tilt
- Eccentricity to 0%
- Inclination to 0%
3c. Mercury atmosphere
- Eliminate or capture/remove Helium, Sodium, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium
- Add water for oceans (66% water coverage) from Pluto
- Add gases for atmosphere from Venus
3d. Mercury artificial magnetosphere
- solid orbital ring of permanent magnets
My god. Finally you answered my request. Thank you so much
Please make a video on what if life existed on every planet in the solar system (our solar system)
We've made something similar. You can watch it here: ruclips.net/video/APTFI_nZtHg/видео.html
Your presentation is absolutely professional and videos are quite interesting as well keep it up what if
If we're talking about mining Jupiter for a planet's worth of hydrogen, why not take some of the C02 from Venus and dump it on Mars? Getting rid of that stuff is one of the main obstacles to making Venus livable, after all. May as well put it to some use.
Instead of swapping put both of them in Earth's orbit but on opposite sides so they don't collide
When there would be January on Venue it'll May on Earth and September on Mars
It turns out Earth is the only planet that harbors life
that's what we discovered so far. there's so much planets so there's definitely life out there
Nice video.
Woohoo caught this one early!
Planet: farts and sneezes at the same time
Habitable zone: *gives every living species an eviction notice*
What if Earth and another planet shared the same orbit, but in opposite places of said orbit? Let's say, what if Venus (as is the closest in size to Earth) shared our orbit, but were in the other side, with the Sun between?
Bad. Jupiter would start to migrate inwards towards the Sun, wrecking the solar system as a result. It's only thanks to its current position and orbital resonance with Saturn can we exist, to appreciate how life can and can't form in the universe.
Literally this video: YEET VENUS AND MARS INTO EACHOTHER'S ORBITS
Sir can u make a video on " what if life exits on every planet of solar system"???
Plz i requested regarding to it many times🙏🙏🙏
Interesting
@@assassin2oo6 yow He made it
He already made it long ago
@@LiterallyallofArabia link?
@@LiterallyallofArabia share the link to us please 😊
2:16 a crummy commercial, son of a.......
Maybe if Mars grew to the size of Venus, it would have remained somewhat habitable because it would have retained its magnetic field, unless something slowed down the planet's rotation like Venus. If that was the case, Mars would still be colder than Earth on average, but the Martian atmosphere would have immured enough heat to have liveable temperatures, albeit probably more like the taiga than tropical eutopia.
So maybe crash all the asteroids in the belt into it and Phobos and Deimos along then tow Ceres as Mars new moon?
Interesting video as per usual
I literally answered all the questions at the beggining in my head
Have you ever been outside? Earth is not just right and this so called "habitable zone" would depend on the characteristics of the planet in question, like the composition of the atmosphere, the amount of geological activity, and it's chemistry in general. An earth like planet in this habitable zone wouldn't be so habitable if the planet was tidally locked with its host star. This could also mean that a planet much further away could be habitable given the right conditions. In fact, A tidally locked planet much further away could be habitable with the right atmosphere and maybe oceans, the heat on one side and the cold on the other could be transfered to either side through the oceans and atmosphere, evening out the temp to something life as we know it could handle. Then again, life as we know it might not be the only type of life that is possible. Some planets could develop life that is very different than us, chemically speaking, and could thrive in conditions that would kill us.
Thx 4 sharing
Venus' pressure is still far less than Earth's though. Cause on the bottom of the ocean it has far more pressure.
I like how in every video the what if concludes with human extinction
Hi
Top twist, this man has the infinity gauntlet and has already done everything on his videos
As a non-english-native person I really struggle to understand descriptions like "a hundred times less dense".
Wouldn't that be basically one per cent as dense or one hundreth of the density?
Or "ten times stronger" - would that mean something is ten times as strong as the original or eleven times as strong, since ten times the original amount is added to the original? English is really confusing to me sometimes.
The way that I like to think of it, a hundred times less dense is the opposite of a hundred times more. So if it’s a hundred times more and it’s sitting at 100 for example, it would now be sitting at 10,000. If it’s a hundred times less dense at 100, it’s 1. Kind of multiplication vs division.
I'm of the mind that terraforming is possible. It's just not possible now.
it would even be possible now for mars, but it would be extremely expensive and would be a many generation project
So what if Venus was in Pluto’s spot in terms of changes?
The venusian atmosphere would slowly freeze and after a long time of cooling down, you'd get a frozen rock with a thin oxygen atmosphere, not much different than Pluto.
Pluto on the other hand would just melt away and its atmosphere would be blown away by the sun, from Earth it would look like a long comet. At the end, only the silicate core would remain of what was Pluto.
It’s bad enough we have to watch the commercials from RUclips, but now you’re putting your own commercials in the videos.
man imagine creators actually wanting to make money too
It’s crazy how we some how have the PERFECT conditions suitable for life and how the slightest change could have prevented it definitely makes you more appreciative
I’ve been wanting to see this what if 😭😭
hey 👋 can you do
“ what if all of earth was land “
now that would be kinda interesting 🧐
Bro that's easy af. We all die
There wont be any natural water so we die
Bruh you User name 🤣
That's technically what earth is. Below all that water, there is land on which the water resides
Releasing the CO2 on Mars would be trivial, as the new, higher temperatures would cause the poles to melt. This would cause its own greenhouse effect. And oceans on Venus aren't that hard if you can get the atmosphere to cool enough to release it. Though the *concentration* of water is tiny, it must be remembered that any concentration on Venus is equivalent to ten times that concentration on Earth, so the *volume* of atmospheric water is immense. Preventing hyper acidification from absorbing the CO2 in the atmosphere is another matter though...
Mars has lots of frozen CO2 (dry ice), not only at the poles, but frozen into the ground. If it were in Venus' orbit, that dry ice would turn into CO2 gas, thickening the atmosphere and trapping more heat, which would cause more CO2 to outgas. There probably isn't enough CO2 on Mars to cause a runaway greenhouse effect and create a second Venus, so the ultimate result would probably be to create a Mars that is closer to being inhabitable than it is now.
I never think about this but I’m interested
The fact that earth is in the perfect position just makes me think even more that God is Real
I think we should swap
position and size with Jupiter
What if we really went through a black hole
Me at 3 am: gets recommended a video abt what will happen if Mars and Venus switch orbits(which never gonna happen)
Me: well well well let's find out
It would be cool they can direct huge comments to Venus
what if the astroid belt was in a different location?
What If you pay for RUclips Premium and the content creator would have enough respect for its audience to not insert ads, at least not at the beginning of the video.
Fascinating
What If I hit the Earth with a giant pool stick right into Mars?
Lets gooooo
Can the next video be what if we found a Roman coin on a planet 70,000 light years away.
People often forget that sulphuric acid is H2SO4 which means that if theres enough sulphuric acid on venus than there's enough hydrogen too.
The best way to create another earth is to smash Mars into Venus. Earth was also hit by a Mars size body and it formed the moon and stabilised earth. MaVenus could be a second earth in a billion years.
Sure, that wouldn't spread debris all over Earth's orbit
Mærnus + Earth = Mærth
Is it just me but like I like I only watch him cuz I have science and we most learn about space so this really helps actually Thanks💝💝
If Venus and Mars swapped orbits, it would have a significant impact on the solar system. The positions and orbits of the planets in the solar system are determined by their mass and distance from the sun, and any change in these factors would have a ripple effect on the rest of the solar system.
One of the most significant impacts would be on the potential habitability of both Venus and Mars. Venus is currently too close to the sun to support life, while Mars is too cold and dry. If Venus were to move to Mars' orbit, it would become much colder and would likely lose its thick atmosphere. Mars, on the other hand, would be much closer to the sun if it were in Venus' orbit, and it would receive much more sunlight and warmth. This would make it much more hospitable for life.
The swap would also have an impact on the orbits and climates of the other planets in the solar system. For example, Earth would be much closer to the sun, which would have a significant impact on its climate and weather patterns.
Overall, while it is an interesting thought experiment, it's important to note that the chances of this happening in reality are practically impossible, as the gravitational forces and the energy required to change the orbits of these planets are immense.
I'm so happy for the next time
Can you do what if The Largest Exoplanet orbited UY Scuti?
It would be a lot easier the leave the planets where they are and harvest Venus's CO2 and transport it to Mars....if you moved about 50% of Venus's CO2 to Mars, they might both be able to be terraformed at that point...
There is more than that, It is Like Mixing salt and pepper.
Make a video about what if everyone have perfect memory
Do a video of What if Pluto and Venus swapped orbits
Mars isn’t actually too far, it’s in the Goldilocks zone, however it cannot maintain heat due to its thin atmesosphere, making it extremely cold, and it has no magnesosphere
But that study, that said there's not enough Co2 on Mars to heat it, it limited itself to the upper levels of the crust, as opposed to Zubrin & McKay.