Don't say he's the next Kubrick. Don't say he's the next Robert Altman. He's Paul Thomas Anderson. He is certainly his own film director, he's amazing.
It's funny how dorky acting he is but at the same time able to put out something as un-dorky as Boogie Nights... he's much cooler acting now that he's grown up. Always been brilliant though.
i love that face that charlie rose makes when pt is describing how he would show films in film school. that look of 'oh, that's a fucking awesome idea.' i felt the same way lol
i think during this time, PT Anderson and Quenti Tarantino arent still friends... today they are best of friends. maybe QT reached out to PTA. he loves Boogie Nights even naming it in his top 20 films since 1992
@shnoepie1 Truthfully, I think in this particular interview PTA kinna holds back when Rose brought up Tarantino simply bc of the "friendly competition" amongst the two..at the time and even to this day in 2012. Tarantino definitely broke down barriers with pulp, and PTA does a fine job acknowledging this. However, during this interview at the time PTA was feeling the rush from recent success from Boogie Nights, so you can't blame him for kind of thinking "Well hey, this is my moment..not Quent
Charlie Rose is a terrible interviewer. He finishes too many sentences for the interviewee and puts words in their mouths throughout the entire interview. He seems rather presumptuous, and egotistical. That's the vibe I get in every interview I watch of his.
I don't think he's a bad interviewer: he makes his interviewees very comfortable and they're always candid as a result. You're right about finishing their sentences though, and putting words in their mouths. I have no idea why Charlie does that, just a bad habit I suppose.
Film Super That's not his job at all. His job is to coax out the most sincere and interesting answers from the interviewee. What he's doing is putting words in their mouth, words which they wouldn't have chosen themselves.
Don't say he's the next Kubrick. Don't say he's the next Robert Altman. He's Paul Thomas Anderson. He is certainly his own film director, he's amazing.
I think people should stop PTA as "the next Kubrick" and start looking at him as "the next Robert Altman".
He admits to having a "leg up" entering the film business having been born in Los Angeles.
In all honesty and interest, how does one compare Boogie Nights and Pulp Fiction. They completely different movies.
It's funny how dorky acting he is but at the same time able to put out something as un-dorky as Boogie Nights... he's much cooler acting now that he's grown up. Always been brilliant though.
Great filmmaker (one of the best in my opinion)
i love that face that charlie rose makes when pt is describing how he would show films in film school. that look of 'oh, that's a fucking awesome idea.' i felt the same way lol
fuckin master. no pun intended, seriously.
Really great interview.
Thanks for the upload!
Did Bill Hader and Paul trade places?
Wow man, I don't know if I could pick which one is better, that's a bold statement. Two great films though.
PTA is the best director ever!!!!!!!!
i think during this time, PT Anderson and Quenti Tarantino arent still friends...
today they are best of friends. maybe QT reached out to PTA. he loves Boogie Nights even naming it in his top 20 films since 1992
@shnoepie1
Truthfully, I think in this particular interview PTA kinna holds back when Rose brought up Tarantino simply bc of the "friendly competition" amongst the two..at the time and even to this day in 2012. Tarantino definitely broke down barriers with pulp, and PTA does a fine job acknowledging this. However, during this interview at the time PTA was feeling the rush from recent success from Boogie Nights, so you can't blame him for kind of thinking "Well hey, this is my moment..not Quent
@RoathRipper He was just quoting something anderson said in the interview
@chimpiki I believe that defeats the purpose of his central theme of the last closing minutes of the interview. Get rich quick though, I get ya'.
@93johnk Right on dude, no Tap Out shirt or cursing.
when you said that's a bold statement, where you referencing Pulp Fiction?
you may well have had a 'leg-up' into the film industry paul. that however does not take away from the fact that you are one natural born artist
@MattyLeeschl0ng1990 uh, who gave him a leg up?
GET EM DANGELKE
david mamet
SURE.
LMAO
Puberty at 2:35.
Charlie Rose is a terrible interviewer. He finishes too many sentences for the interviewee and puts words in their mouths throughout the entire interview. He seems rather presumptuous, and egotistical. That's the vibe I get in every interview I watch of his.
I don't think he's a bad interviewer: he makes his interviewees very comfortable and they're always candid as a result. You're right about finishing their sentences though, and putting words in their mouths. I have no idea why Charlie does that, just a bad habit I suppose.
Film Super That's not his job at all. His job is to coax out the most sincere and interesting answers from the interviewee. What he's doing is putting words in their mouth, words which they wouldn't have chosen themselves.
Battleship Potemkin.