Thanks for being here! We're working on a part two for the update series that should be debuting soon so keep an eye out for that. If you'd like to support the channel beyond a like or a sub then just watching this video to the end would really help us out. Hope you have an easy Monday and a pleasureable week!
@Audit the Audit could you delve into the case on @Unsolved Mysteries_Crime case of a Mr. KIM and a 1994 cold case from Atlanta? It's very interesting how FBI cleared him in 2000 but he was arrested for a dismissed warrant from 94?
@fafafohigh69 imma need you to clarify that so I can understand... it looks like you implied that someone can infringe on someone's rights... by exercising their own. I'm curious about how that could be possible. Which right are you talking about so we can understand
And that’s exactly why assembling protests should be protected under the first amendment and NOT called “parades.” Protest is how We the People get the attention of ‘governmental authority’ that otherwise would ignore the citizens’ grievances
Being from Cali, by father taught us that The Black Panthers helped the people that cops abused every day and fed people. They exist because of the kind of crap we see in this video. Abuse of power. I am an old white guy who knows that whet the protesters did her needs PROTECTED not pushed back on. Our first amendment rights should not be squeezed so tight it becomes imposable to exercise them. I hope you help push this trial to its conclusion. Peace.
You don't have liberty, you don't have rights, you have privileges and privileges can be taken away, don't believe me? Ask the Japanese decedents that were placed in internment camps in the 1940's.
no it’s not, i’m sorry but everyone complaining ab cops doing stuff like that are babies. Hand over your fucking ID, it’ll come back clean unless ur a POS, then they’ll tell you, and you can drive away. They also have the right to do that lmao, laws go both ways
I agree. Maybe they'd have a few less problems with some people if they told them why they stopped them in the first place. I've been stopped for something minor before (headlight out) and the cop actually asked me if I knew why he'd stopped me. Which I did because it had just went out that night (I was driving home from work) and I explained that to him. All this, give me your info first then I'll tell you just seems counter productive and adds to people's distrust of officers.
There is a case in Houston Texas where a cop was on his way to work in a hurry and decided to go the wrong way to avoid traffic. The cop hit and killed a young man in a head on collision. No charges have been filled.
Not the one you were talking about but Google the following..... Mother, sister of innocent woman killed in Harris County Or Woman dies after being hit in front of her kids by HPD unit
@@modernNeanderthal800 Accidents/tragedies happen. You weaken the argument by bringing up cases where there's no reason to believe that the cops are responsible, and no reason to believe that charges wouldn't be filed if there was evidence to support it.
@@janitorizamped consider that I looked for the article he spoke about and I couldn't find it So maybe his point was weak and his evidence not real --- or at the least unable to be verified
@@HesterPrynne293 What I see is mob justice. Those people were out there demanding the heads of those men without any proof. The video of the statement from Gibson makes so sense, he changes the story over and over. The shell casings found AROUND the place Gibson says it took place do not match any of the firearms the father and son owned.
Didn’t some protesting rights get revoked in three Southern states? Supreme court decision in the same district where Texas is? Privilege or not even that..
Notice that's armed protestor(s). Plural does make a *big* difference. If this were one armed civilian exercising their right to protest peacefully, I believe "I'm going to hold this for officer safety while we sort this out" would have been significantly more likely. Of course, that's purely speculation. O.o
Can't help but notice how polite the interaction remained. There were raised voices, but no police put hands on anyone. Interesting how proper and respectful things get when the people are armed.
Dude, that's literally luck of the draw. Ive seen plenty of interactions go incredibly south solely because a person was legally carrying a weapon and the cops did not approve of that. So no. Everybody being armed is not a solution to the problem.
@@robertmoray988 I thought firearms were legal to own in my northern neighbors' country, albeit with registration, background checks, and other restrictions. I had no idea it was "very illegal", whatever that means, to even posses a firearm. Not that I planned on moving there or anything. I'm sure they wouldn't want me and I'm happy living here in the mountains. Cheers, eh!
Everyone should know that even if there isn't a paved sidewalk there is a pedestrian right of way on the side of any public road. In my state it is 32 or 33 feet from the center line. Technically a homeowner owns half of the road that is on their property, but it is part of the right of way. If the state cuts a tree on your right of way they have the right to, but they have to give you the wood if you want it. That way the state can collect taxes for all the public land that we own.
@@cult_of_odin what if the protest was for the construction of sidewalks? There are about 5 other things I could say, but I want to hear your response to the simplest one.
@@siegehardt depending on the location the unpaved area can be more dangerous; especially for a group of people. Furry woodland creatures, venomous creatures, and trip and fall hazards. Also, although it has not been codified into law it is generally accepted that peaceful protests have to be disruptive in some way. If not the other two options are being ignored or violent protests.
The cowards shut down their Facebook page, they're really bad at this freedom thing. A permit for a protest negates the purpose of a protest and violates the constitution.
They all shut it down... only praise is allowed. Seems this is essentially another inconsistency with the 1st amendment... the ability to redress govt for grievances.
@@JohnDoe-lx3dt Oh so you're perfectly okay with those Just Stop Oil people blocking traffic and making hundreds or even thousands of people late for their jobs? The First Amendment does NOT grant an unfettered right to speak whatever, wherever, whenever or however, for obvious reasons.
Well blacks shouldnt have rights in the first place especially the cry baby bitches that cry about some fake ass shit they have NEVER experienced. Thanks Lincoln
Amazing how that works when it's all black people, huh? They get a pass because police are afraid to use force or even say anything because they don't want to get called racist. 😂 Yte protestors would have been immediately arrested or worse.
Yeah I had a pretty shztty feeling when he said "the following footage was filmed by one of the protestors"...no bodycam in his district or on his overalls?
Once Turner left, the cops acted oddly, to me. It gives me chills. They turned and left in unison. Like they both knew their unified mission to hem Turner up was over. The cop’s fake-friendly charade, dropped. Like in the movies, when the killer drops the act, and you see the darkness inside.
Trump promised to make the police immune to prosecution. Even the stated desire to officially turn the USA Into a police state is 100% a deal breaker for me.
The idea that so long as you claim an activity under a right it is legal is absurd. If my protest is assembling legally to repeatedly kick someone in the mouth, for example, I don't get to claim my rights protect me. I'm not saying you aren't right about this case, I'm saying your argument is off.
They don't need a permit to protest. What they needed was a permit to stand in the road and block traffic. Why are there so many ignorant people in here. It's common law. Are you being this dumb on purpose?
I bet it's for the same reason that the investigator "mishandled" evidence. The police see the shooters as "their kind of people", but not the young man making deliveries.
Generally speaking, a prosecutor will charge the highest crime they believe they can actually get a conviction for, not necessarily the highest crime committed. Attempted murder means that the prosecutors will have to prove that the dad and son explicitly intended to kill the driver (as opposed to merely wound him for example), which is almost impossible to prove without a confession of their intent. Overcharging and being consequently unable to get a conviction is actually one of the most common ways for guilty people to walk free. This is especially the case in high profile cases, where public pressure to overcharge is a common problem. And to be clear, in this case specifically, it's actually just outright a bad thing that these charges were upped. In MS, sentencing guidelines for Ag Assault actually aren't significantly less than those for attempted murder. TLDR is that it's fairly likely that the father and son will walk on the more serious charges, when the Ag Assault could've put them in prison for basically just as long. It seems to me that the charges were upped as a result of public pressure by people who didn't understand the implications of upping the charges, and that has left the driver in a situation where he is much less likely to get justice.
As a well armed white man, I'm glad my black american brothers and sisters are finally getting to a point where they can safely protest while armed. It's time we move on beyond racism as a society. These men and women are PILLARS of the community.
Not fat shaming but having a sheriff that so big he can't fit into a uniform doesn't make me feel like he's going to do a great job serving or protecting!
Idk, it's the 21st century, and the reason for the 2nd, was to combat a tyrannical govt. I think we've moved beyond the ability to do so. It's anachronistic now, considering the 3rd has to do with housing constipated soldiers, witch hasn't aged nearly as well? Don't get me wrong, I'm not viemenly against it, just something to consider.
From what ive seen minority communities currently hate blue more than anything else. People are finally after 16 years of tyrrany something might actually change.
The last clip shows one of the best, quiet, well informed and professional auditors around. His channel is "Battousai" Phillip Turner that was able to get a case law put in effect called "TURNER vs DRIVER". Driver is a tyrant cop who GOT OWNED by Turner.😊😊
These officers should be telling Mr Turner why he’s been stopped so he can protect his rights. If no law was broken then you wouldn’t need to surrender your ID.🤷🏼♀️
Makes my blood boil that the right to protest and peacefully assemble needs a permit. Fck no. There are no rights in this country if you need permission to use them.
They had the right to assemble and protest. But when they started walking in the middle of the road and blocking traffic is when they started committing a crime and were told to leave. You should learn common laws.
@@noslack1800 you get punished but not if you have the money for a permit or to pay the fine apparently. so you are allowed to infringe on rights if you have the money for it.
Constitutional law needs to be taught in middle and high school. Once a generation of good education makes it into the government levels of employment a lot of this nonsense will stop.
But that’s exactly why those won’t be taught. The state doesn’t want an educated populace, especially when it pertains to rights that may prevent its agents (law enforcement) from extracting wealth from the public.
Where in the constitution does it say “THESE RIGHTS ARE NOT ABSOLUTE” - Just because nine men gave themselves the power of judicial review doesn’t mean they are right.
If a few people gather together they want to bust them up unless you got a permitssion slip from your big daddy governmennt slave master determining when and where you get to excersize rights only with permitssion slips
The key word here is "Congress". State, county, city, and privately owned facilities can impose reasonable restrictions on when and where citizens are allowed to go, and what they are and are not allowed to do while there. Big libraries for example, the ones that have rare book rooms, typically don't allow any photography or filming while in such rooms, and such a restriction does not constitute a violation of the first amendment.
Dude, I was SHOCKED to hear your voice today while teaching Envision math. I was like, that’s Audit the Audit but of course there were no adults in the room I could tell. Loved hearing your voice explain division to my class. I’ve only heard your voice on one lesson. 😂
The person you hear in these Audit the Audit videos is a voice actor, not John Lang. You can go to the oldest A2A videos to hear John Lang's voice. John writes the script/puts the videos together, but hires someone to read it.
When bad police departments violate citizenzs rights I've noticed since the 1960s eventually the protections against police harassement are severely tightened.
The constitution gives the states the authority to pass state laws saw as requiring permits for peaceful assembly. You can’t just clamor for part of the Constitution. See the 10th amendment.
I know it is a ploy for many cops to ask you to roll your window down because they "can't hear you." I would think it would be difficult to hear for officers sometimes due to road noise. He did finally turn his ear toward the window which is indicative of him having difficulty hearing. In this day and age of constant use of earphones, earbuds, etc, I would think there is a fair amount of hearing loss amongst the general population & even more so with cops, fire & EMS that don't wear hearing protection while running to a call with lights & siren. So, compound hearing loss with background noise, & you get difficulty hearing.
@@Rkbmomma As Mr. Turner pointed out. Being on the side where the traffic noise was coming from didn't help him. And from an 'Officer Safety' standpoint is more dangerous. If the driver's door offered a better opportunity for hearing and was safer for the officer. Why would he have approached on that side of the car? Tactically it isn't a smart move either.
This comment likely won't be visible. Most of his grading is a mix between what the courts will let the police get away with and a little boost to keep his leather dieted audience happy.
in the second video you can clearly see the cops were fish for anything. Why did the lady cop have to take a photo of him? Just just so corrupt and out fishing and came up short on all counts.
I noticed that! Pure harassment. I would have hidden my face. That should have been surely illegal, as he was inside his car, being forced to have window lowered for tint meter allegedly.
Sounds like the police investigator is either incompetent or malicious in his handling of evidence, and either needs to lose his LEO cert (and never be allowed to be a LEO ever again) or be charged with a crime for withholding/manipulating evidence.
Lol, I can swear I saw a battousai video where a cop was trying to make him id for filming. He told the cop it was lawful to film them, and the cop said something to the effect of "you need to learn the law better"...lmao😂. If I remember right they threatened him with arrest, so he told them his name, and you could see the cop instantly knew he f'ed up.
The entire concept that you have to get permission from the government to protest the government is absolutely antithetical to the idea of this country and I find it completely f****** absurd that that's not something brought up more
Last time I checked, the Constitution doesn't say anything about needing a permit to protest. The cop's excuse is that they have so many people protesting that they are blocking traffic, yet HE is the one who's got traffic blocked with HIS vehicle. Absolute hypocrites!!!
Hearing you say Battousai cracked me up every time. Not that you said it wrong or anything, the imagery that it inspired in my mind was quite funny. Great content as per usual. Keep grinding, brother
There is a big problem right here. How is this not seen as an obvious conflict of interest. The law as written gives the police chief the ability to deny any permit for any gathering that he/she does not care for(such as a protest of police practices for example). This is clearly a poorly written law. Putting such a decision in the hands of one person is just ripe for misuse. 6:42
I've lived here in Washington DC for 59 years now, and here is the ordinance on protesting in the nation's capital: "You'll need a permit to demonstrate on federal land if you have 25 or more people. Exceptions: Up to 500 people allowed without permit at Franklin Park at 13th & K St NW, or McPherson Square at 15th & K St NW. Up to 100 people allowed on the green space at 18th & H St NW." Those exception spaces have protests there daily. A rinky dink town in this video should not be allowed to overtly violate the 1st amendment with some trumped up ordinances. These protesters would surely win their case....eventually. But because our city, local and state judicial system is so corrupted, it will cost them lots of money spent on their case in order to get justice.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for being here! We're working on a part two for the update series that should be debuting soon so keep an eye out for that. If you'd like to support the channel beyond a like or a sub then just watching this video to the end would really help us out. Hope you have an easy Monday and a pleasureable week!
Thank you
I love the double features! Like and subscribe. This dude deserves it
@Audit the Audit could you delve into the case on @Unsolved Mysteries_Crime case of a Mr. KIM and a 1994 cold case from Atlanta? It's very interesting how FBI cleared him in 2000 but he was arrested for a dismissed warrant from 94?
Is a “B” above average?
This feels like an average or even a “ C- “ for the officer.
We need to hold the law to a higher standard.
Great video.
@fafafohigh69 imma need you to clarify that so I can understand... it looks like you implied that someone can infringe on someone's rights... by exercising their own. I'm curious about how that could be possible. Which right are you talking about so we can understand
"Nobody had time to meet with us before, but now EVERYBODYS OUT HERE!"
Perfect. Call them out for their hypocrisy.
This should be top comment
And that’s exactly why assembling protests should be protected under the first amendment and NOT called “parades.”
Protest is how We the People get the attention of ‘governmental authority’ that otherwise would ignore the citizens’ grievances
Damn skippy.
Being from Cali, by father taught us that The Black Panthers helped the people that cops abused every day and fed people. They exist because of the kind of crap we see in this video. Abuse of power. I am an old white guy who knows that whet the protesters did her needs PROTECTED not pushed back on. Our first amendment rights should not be squeezed so tight it becomes imposable to exercise them. I hope you help push this trial to its conclusion. Peace.
Black Pantera is criminal organization
Asking permission to exercise your rights isn't liberty.
This should have atleast 100k likes!! America is America because of that Liberty!!
You don't have liberty, you don't have rights, you have privileges and privileges can be taken away, don't believe me? Ask the Japanese decedents that were placed in internment camps in the 1940's.
This needs more likes
"You have rights, just make sure to ask government for permission to use thise rights"
-government
Yeah, Congress can't make any laws abridging the 1st amendment but apparently the courts and local municipalities can. Make that make sense.
Asking the government for permission to protest that very government seems like a conflict of interest.
So does “internal investigations”.
"Daddy, can I ask you permission to tell you something you did wrong?" Yeah... that doesn't work...
Gotta ask our slavemaster for pernission to to everything thats how it works to the gooberment
Can we stop calling them peace officers.
Conflict enforcers?
I like to call them, jackals! They roam about looking for prey!
Peace officers should carry lollipops and free movie tickets.
Yeah, i use road pirates or slave traders. Technically its a slave trade, look up the 13th amendment
"Jak Boots"
Cops refusing to tell people why they pulled them over until they get their info is ridiculous. 100% power trip.
In most places it's also legal for cops to do so though
I'm glad my state passed a law against that. Cops have to by law now tell you why they are detaining you before they ask for information in my state
no it’s not, i’m sorry but everyone complaining ab cops doing stuff like that are babies. Hand over your fucking ID, it’ll come back clean unless ur a POS, then they’ll tell you, and you can drive away. They also have the right to do that lmao, laws go both ways
I agree. Maybe they'd have a few less problems with some people if they told them why they stopped them in the first place. I've been stopped for something minor before (headlight out) and the cop actually asked me if I knew why he'd stopped me. Which I did because it had just went out that night (I was driving home from work) and I explained that to him. All this, give me your info first then I'll tell you just seems counter productive and adds to people's distrust of officers.
I hate this it can completely escalate situations for no reason...
There is a case in Houston Texas where a cop was on his way to work in a hurry and decided to go the wrong way to avoid traffic. The cop hit and killed a young man in a head on collision. No charges have been filled.
God that’s awful they really like to stretch qualified even tho there’d be no grounds to use it in this case
Not the one you were talking about but Google the following.....
Mother, sister of innocent woman killed in Harris County
Or
Woman dies after being hit in front of her kids by HPD unit
@@modernNeanderthal800
Accidents/tragedies happen. You weaken the argument by bringing up cases where there's no reason to believe that the cops are responsible, and no reason to believe that charges wouldn't be filed if there was evidence to support it.
@@janitorizamped consider that I looked for the article he spoke about and I couldn't find it
So maybe his point was weak and his evidence not real --- or at the least unable to be verified
A protest permit? This is not a parade. There is no accountability here from this police chief.
There is no accountability for any government official
I don’t see a protest. I see a vigil for a young man that was almost killed…..
@@HesterPrynne293 What I see is mob justice. Those people were out there demanding the heads of those men without any proof. The video of the statement from Gibson makes so sense, he changes the story over and over. The shell casings found AROUND the place Gibson says it took place do not match any of the firearms the father and son owned.
@@HesterPrynne293 You might want to learn the definition of vigil. It's the middle of the day.
@@James-vn8zb You might want to check Webster’s yourself. While you’re there, check out MORON.
If you need permission to exercise your rights... then they're not rights, they're privileges... and privileges can be withdrawn.
Well said!
You've been at legal war since 2008. Your rights are also not legally binding.
Didn’t some protesting rights get revoked in three Southern states? Supreme court decision in the same district where Texas is? Privilege or not even that..
💯
Your rights don't include standing in the street blocking traffic.
Protestors were hevily armed. Can you see how calm cops were when protestors also had weapons to carry.
Too bad many 2nd Amendment supporters are also bootlicking, back the blue morons.
You have to show them your power so they understand it.
That's the 1st thing I notice cause the playing field was level
Notice that's armed protestor(s). Plural does make a *big* difference. If this were one armed civilian exercising their right to protest peacefully, I believe "I'm going to hold this for officer safety while we sort this out" would have been significantly more likely. Of course, that's purely speculation. O.o
@@GabrielHill1Then it is not a peaceful protest and does require a permit.
The intention is to exercise your rights, not to threaten the populace
The tone in the public servants' voice just shows that they can't stand people invoking their Rights.
"servants"
Of course they can't. These are black men backing the blue even though the blue will never back the black man.
you know its about to be crazy when chief of police is wearing overalls lol
I know! I nearly pissed myself.. True professional, this one.
State of this fool, too fat for uniform, ignorant of constitution.
Too fat to wear pants
lol. I died when I saw that.
Such a professional, can't even be bothered to put on his uniform. He shouldn't even be allowed to say anything if he's not in uniform.
Man do i love these double episodes. You have now overtaken lackluster as my favorite RUclips channel. Keep up the good work!
Can't help but notice how polite the interaction remained. There were raised voices, but no police put hands on anyone. Interesting how proper and respectful things get when the people are armed.
Right? I didn't know black people were capable of civil disobedience.
Cops seem to be more polite when they OUTNUMBERED by armed citizens.
Dude, that's literally luck of the draw. Ive seen plenty of interactions go incredibly south solely because a person was legally carrying a weapon and the cops did not approve of that. So no. Everybody being armed is not a solution to the problem.
No. They were armed and they have numbers. They are almost equal in force to the police, that is why the police are respectful
@@ryandono5721 literally facts. Anyone to deny this is lying and deceiving themselves and others.
Has no one in this police department heard of uniform standards, height/weight standards, or the Bill of Rights?
i think the larger you are the more authority they give you?
Probably their day off
@@lilwestkid There was a cartoon about that"animal farm"
Mind you, while they're fucking with people for no reason other than "i rather try to violate rights than to be an actual crime fighter"
Those dungarees the chief was wearing 😂😅😊
You won't get justice in the USA in a courtroom or from the police.
I find it interesting the cops are a lot more willing to talk about your rights and not instantly violate them when you armed.
Yet…demographically speaking 93% of these people vote for elected officials who promise to, and enact laws to disarm citizens…
@@robertmoray988 Damn, that sucks.
@@robertmoray988 I thought firearms were legal to own in my northern neighbors' country, albeit with registration, background checks, and other restrictions. I had no idea it was "very illegal", whatever that means, to even posses a firearm. Not that I planned on moving there or anything. I'm sure they wouldn't want me and I'm happy living here in the mountains. Cheers, eh!
@@robertmoray988 Thanks for the information!
Chief Ruckus pulled up to regulate, and found out there’s power in numbers. There’s a lesson to be learned here.
RUCKUS!!!!😂😂😂😂
I think he was rolled out there ...
There's also power in guns.
That’s the power of numbers in firearms. They are the great equalizer!
Everyone should know that even if there isn't a paved sidewalk there is a pedestrian right of way on the side of any public road. In my state it is 32 or 33 feet from the center line. Technically a homeowner owns half of the road that is on their property, but it is part of the right of way. If the state cuts a tree on your right of way they have the right to, but they have to give you the wood if you want it. That way the state can collect taxes for all the public land that we own.
Permit for protests is the most counterintuitive thing ive ever heard of. "you can only protest against us if we let you"
I can understand a permit if the road is being blocked. If not no permit needed.
@@cult_of_odin what if the protest was for the construction of sidewalks?
There are about 5 other things I could say, but I want to hear your response to the simplest one.
@@john2g1 Not american so not sure if its illegal to stand on the grass but the grass would be a good spot to protest instead of blocking the street
You do know that standing in the middle of the street without a permit is crime?
@@siegehardt depending on the location the unpaved area can be more dangerous; especially for a group of people.
Furry woodland creatures, venomous creatures, and trip and fall hazards.
Also, although it has not been codified into law it is generally accepted that peaceful protests have to be disruptive in some way. If not the other two options are being ignored or violent protests.
He ran his plates and found out that he's the very Philip Turner from Turner v. Driver.
And that freaked him out ...
We all have a permit to protest. It’s called the constitution.
Literally the best comment here.
"Yall leave the area obey comply follow orders"
You have the right to protest as long as the government says it's okay.
Not true we don’t need permission from the government to do this
The cowards shut down their Facebook page, they're really bad at this freedom thing.
A permit for a protest negates the purpose of a protest and violates the constitution.
They all shut it down... only praise is allowed. Seems this is essentially another inconsistency with the 1st amendment... the ability to redress govt for grievances.
@@joshua_forrest Glad they were forced to, shows the hate they got to see to have them make that move
Its all subjective to time and place look it up you cant protest or assemble anywhere. Time and place
@@26JonnyDspoken like a true tyrant, congrats
@@JohnDoe-lx3dt Oh so you're perfectly okay with those Just Stop Oil people blocking traffic and making hundreds or even thousands of people late for their jobs?
The First Amendment does NOT grant an unfettered right to speak whatever, wherever, whenever or however, for obvious reasons.
If you ask permission, you ain't protesting
That sheriff's office was real calm with them heavily armed Black Panthers😂.
😂 right?
Well blacks shouldnt have rights in the first place especially the cry baby bitches that cry about some fake ass shit they have NEVER experienced. Thanks Lincoln
Amazing how that works when it's all black people, huh? They get a pass because police are afraid to use force or even say anything because they don't want to get called racist. 😂 Yte protestors would have been immediately arrested or worse.
The Chief is built for feed, not for speed.
I thought he was a farmer who just stopped to talked initially 😂
He looks like he's there to put a fresh coat of plaster on the walls.
@@Sage-Thyme😂😂🤣🤣✌️
Sanford and Son 😂
@@Stephen-q1k Elizabeth, I’m coming to ya!!🤣🤣✌️
Time/place/manner is what will keep us under the government’s boot.
Those restrictions are reasonable, just like prohibitions on filming inside public buildings are reasonable.
No way that chief passes a fitness exam. What a disgrace
Oh come on now. He's just trying to be like his idol Victor Orban.
It’s seems they only have to pass a fitness test at the academy. Imagine a calendar of fat cops vs swoll fire fighters that have required fitness
I doubt he can pass a “put the square block in the square hole” test.
Look at the state of him.
Scruffy. Looks like he reeks.
Bet he's never passed the dinner que.
The chief needs to chill out. What’s wrong with him? He just goes around making up laws in his overalls.
Yeah I had a pretty shztty feeling when he said "the following footage was filmed by one of the protestors"...no bodycam in his district or on his overalls?
He's like a parody . He's terrible
😂😂😂😂😂😂 He was pitiful looking. I can't believe he's a chief. He came in ready to agitate.
He would have to put the 🍩 down to know laws.
@@jester3443 My cousin makes custom clothes, bet she'd iron-on a donut to some overalls for me for free, so I can mail them to him.
God Bless these Men. Doing Gods work!! Got nothing but love for you!
30 days to peacefully protest and then they deny the permit. Prior restrain.
Theyd deny the permit if its any group they dont like protesting
Once Turner left, the cops acted oddly, to me. It gives me chills. They turned and left in unison. Like they both knew their unified mission to hem Turner up was over. The cop’s fake-friendly charade, dropped. Like in the movies, when the killer drops the act, and you see the darkness inside.
They don't ask certain other people protesting for a permit.
Chief wearing overalls is all I need to know about this county
Too many biscuits and gravy????
@@rogerspencer4071😅😂😅😂😅
@@rogerspencer4071 no such thing as too much biscuit n gravy. Lol. Mmmm
I think he’s just too fat for pants
@@rogerspencer4071 Too much of everything, except exercise.
I just love it, when officers think their policy or city ordinance trumps the constitution. Giants of intelligence.
Trump promised to make the police immune to prosecution. Even the stated desire to officially turn the USA Into a police state is 100% a deal breaker for me.
They are taught that their ordinances trump the constitution which is only an assumption.
It was peaceful until they showed up.
"Sorry i had a fight at your Black Panther Partayyy..." -Forrest Gump
😂😂😂😂😂😂
If we need a permit to protest we don’t have rights.
@@mosthole thank you for your valuable input
@@mostholethat’s what I hate about auditing style channels. Everyone just repeats the same thing.
@@mostholesmarter than you boot shiner
The idea that so long as you claim an activity under a right it is legal is absurd. If my protest is assembling legally to repeatedly kick someone in the mouth, for example, I don't get to claim my rights protect me.
I'm not saying you aren't right about this case, I'm saying your argument is off.
They don't need a permit to protest. What they needed was a permit to stand in the road and block traffic. Why are there so many ignorant people in here. It's common law. Are you being this dumb on purpose?
The ordinance is completely unconstitutional.
Also, son and dad attempted to murder the FedEx Driver so why were they not immediately charged with attempted murder??!!🤬
I bet it's for the same reason that the investigator "mishandled" evidence. The police see the shooters as "their kind of people", but not the young man making deliveries.
We all know why
Well you see, the FedEx driver has significantly more melanin than the would-be killers.
Generally speaking, a prosecutor will charge the highest crime they believe they can actually get a conviction for, not necessarily the highest crime committed. Attempted murder means that the prosecutors will have to prove that the dad and son explicitly intended to kill the driver (as opposed to merely wound him for example), which is almost impossible to prove without a confession of their intent. Overcharging and being consequently unable to get a conviction is actually one of the most common ways for guilty people to walk free. This is especially the case in high profile cases, where public pressure to overcharge is a common problem.
And to be clear, in this case specifically, it's actually just outright a bad thing that these charges were upped. In MS, sentencing guidelines for Ag Assault actually aren't significantly less than those for attempted murder. TLDR is that it's fairly likely that the father and son will walk on the more serious charges, when the Ag Assault could've put them in prison for basically just as long. It seems to me that the charges were upped as a result of public pressure by people who didn't understand the implications of upping the charges, and that has left the driver in a situation where he is much less likely to get justice.
Mississippi.
So glad you covered this and so happy to see armed black men standing up for our communities
Yes! Just like how armed white men assembling to protest to stand up for their communities is wonderful.
Amen! 🙏🏽
As a well armed white man, I'm glad my black american brothers and sisters are finally getting to a point where they can safely protest while armed. It's time we move on beyond racism as a society. These men and women are PILLARS of the community.
Absolutely!!! Its about time,kudos to those guys and ladies. This is the black panthers I remember. Always loved those guys.
5:25 Imposing "some restrictions" against the First Amendment is in direct violation of the very fabric of the constitution.
A.T. A, I don't know if you are a lawyer, but you break down the law for a layman like me for easy understanding. Much appreciation. ❤
Turner is a legend and one of the original auditors.
Not fat shaming but having a sheriff that so big he can't fit into a uniform doesn't make me feel like he's going to do a great job serving or protecting!
Phat phuq could not catch a toddler in traffic.
AMERICANS practicing their rights to carry... its friken beautiful....
Puts fear into bullies, that's why it's universally hated by anything administrative that wasn't elected.
Idk, it's the 21st century, and the reason for the 2nd, was to combat a tyrannical govt. I think we've moved beyond the ability to do so. It's anachronistic now, considering the 3rd has to do with housing constipated soldiers, witch hasn't aged nearly as well? Don't get me wrong, I'm not viemenly against it, just something to consider.
?
The open carry is amazing
"When was the last time you received a ticket?"
"It's on my dash cam"
😂
They get black to back the blue even though the blue will never back the black.
Modern day social Socrates shit right here, poetic
From what ive seen minority communities currently hate blue more than anything else. People are finally after 16 years of tyrrany something might actually change.
1:48
"You all don't have a protest permit"
That's the stupidest phrase ever spoken into existence
A protest permit is fucking hilarious😂
A permit to assemble 😂 a permit to dissassemble a permit to put a gun in your pocket a permit to have an opinion
Thanks!
The Chief is in bad shape. They should have rules like the military, that tests your fitness. If you are not fit, you are fired.
Don't discriminate against spheres, just because they don't have angles doesn't mean they aren't as equal as other shapes!
They're arming up like the military already
His Big ASS, is a Heart Attack, Waiting to Happen😂😂😂😂😂😂!!!! Diabetic, High Blood Pressure, High Blood Sugar. And Most Likely, Smelly Too😂😂😂😂😂😂😂!!!!!!
Physical and mental fitness. Chief failed both
Alot of ex military are cops. Both don't require thinking skills.
The last clip shows one of the best, quiet, well informed and professional auditors around. His channel is "Battousai" Phillip Turner that was able to get a case law put in effect called "TURNER vs DRIVER". Driver is a tyrant cop who GOT OWNED by Turner.😊😊
Kudos to the State Trooper for being the ultimate professional.
Since when is the right to protest and free speech only done by a permit now? 😂 The cops are outta control.
In places where there are more places to buy/sell a banjo than there are dentists.
@@sirslickrock Not true, police departments everywhere do this trick where they try to convince you that you need a permit.
@sirslickrock i dunno man unconstitutional laws get passed north and south of the Mason Dixie line.
Not only cops are out of control, DA'S, judges, legislators and representatives and even presidents
Well if you stand in the middle of the street, you kind of need a permit for it.
These officers should be telling Mr Turner why he’s been stopped so he can protect his rights. If no law was broken then you wouldn’t need to surrender your ID.🤷🏼♀️
The only reason they talked to the protestors for so long is because they were exercising their 2nd amendment. 👍
All that fishing and you think that deputy would have caught SOMETHING. 😂😂
Makes my blood boil that the right to protest and peacefully assemble needs a permit. Fck no. There are no rights in this country if you need permission to use them.
I was gonna respond to you but forget to file for a permit to speak
They had the right to assemble and protest. But when they started walking in the middle of the road and blocking traffic is when they started committing a crime and were told to leave. You should learn common laws.
@@noslack1800you should learn what protests are and do.
@@derpythean-comdoge8608 You should learn we have laws for a reason. And if you break those laws you get punished.
@@noslack1800 you get punished but not if you have the money for a permit or to pay the fine apparently. so you are allowed to infringe on rights if you have the money for it.
Moral of the story: Never ask permission to flex your rights.
So traffic worked until police arrived...
Heh
Constitutional law needs to be taught in middle and high school. Once a generation of good education makes it into the government levels of employment a lot of this nonsense will stop.
Exactly
Yeah right. We can't convince people of the like the earth is a globe, how are we gonna explain ineffable rights.
But that’s exactly why those won’t be taught. The state doesn’t want an educated populace, especially when it pertains to rights that may prevent its agents (law enforcement) from extracting wealth from the public.
No peach parents need to
Where in the Constitution or Bill of Rights does it say your allowed to stand in the street and block people's right to travel?
27:06 “So where’s this at?”
*proceeds to roll up window and drive off while cop just looks stupid*
😂😂😂😂😂😂
any officer who refuses to tell someone why the y pulled them over until the traffic stop is over is a piece of trash.
Or a cop who keeps asking where your staying and or located. Like wtf kinda psycho shit is that
Or a cop that drives in traffic with their brights on.
ACAB/FELPOITW
And when you flash your brights on n off quickly, to alert them their brights are on, theyll pull you over. @@benzin5458
Or a cop
"mr turner, would you admit to tailgating for me? Would you admit to speeding for me? (Repeat)'
THAT. That’s what THAT was brother.
🎯
That was pathetic. That cops fake polite tone while he's being an utter snake is despicable.
Where in the constitution does it say “THESE RIGHTS ARE NOT ABSOLUTE” - Just because nine men gave themselves the power of judicial review doesn’t mean they are right.
"Congress shall make no law regarding..." and then "here are the laws regarding..."
1st amendment, 2nd amendment, 4th amendment, all gone, while supreme court justices openly accept bribes.
If a few people gather together they want to bust them up unless you got a permitssion slip from your big daddy governmennt slave master determining when and where you get to excersize rights only with permitssion slips
The key word here is "Congress". State, county, city, and privately owned facilities can impose reasonable restrictions on when and where citizens are allowed to go, and what they are and are not allowed to do while there. Big libraries for example, the ones that have rare book rooms, typically don't allow any photography or filming while in such rooms, and such a restriction does not constitute a violation of the first amendment.
Dude, I was SHOCKED to hear your voice today while teaching Envision math. I was like, that’s Audit the Audit but of course there were no adults in the room I could tell. Loved hearing your voice explain division to my class. I’ve only heard your voice on one lesson. 😂
The person you hear in these Audit the Audit videos is a voice actor, not John Lang. You can go to the oldest A2A videos to hear John Lang's voice. John writes the script/puts the videos together, but hires someone to read it.
Thank you for exposing these BAD police violating citizens Rights
When bad police departments violate citizenzs rights I've noticed since the 1960s eventually the protections against police harassement are severely tightened.
That’s rich, a black cop telling people they need a protest permit. The right of assembly is a right, not a privilege that requires a permit.
The constitution gives the states the authority to pass state laws saw as requiring permits for peaceful assembly. You can’t just clamor for part of the Constitution. See the 10th amendment.
@@andremets It's no longer about rights, but black entitlement.
What does the color of the cop have anything to do with it?? They’re all corrupt
They were all standing in the road
It's almost like you didn't actually watch the video. All rights have limits.
"I can't hear you" 1) that's an obvious lie and 2) I don't answer questions without a lawyer present so there's nothing to hear anyways.
I know it is a ploy for many cops to ask you to roll your window down because they "can't hear you." I would think it would be difficult to hear for officers sometimes due to road noise. He did finally turn his ear toward the window which is indicative of him having difficulty hearing. In this day and age of constant use of earphones, earbuds, etc, I would think there is a fair amount of hearing loss amongst the general population & even more so with cops, fire & EMS that don't wear hearing protection while running to a call with lights & siren. So, compound hearing loss with background noise, & you get difficulty hearing.
@@Rkbmomma As Mr. Turner pointed out. Being on the side where the traffic noise was coming from didn't help him. And from an 'Officer Safety' standpoint is more dangerous. If the driver's door offered a better opportunity for hearing and was safer for the officer. Why would he have approached on that side of the car? Tactically it isn't a smart move either.
I love this. Instead of telling him why he was stopped as he said he would. He asks nine questions and walked away.
Today is 10/14/24… I pray the first incident is concluded peacefully for the victim.
How you give the cop a B when he violated Turner from the beginning! Unbelievable!!!
This comment likely won't be visible.
Most of his grading is a mix between what the courts will let the police get away with and a little boost to keep his leather dieted audience happy.
Ass to Ass likes to sniff cop farts.
Apparently chief hasn’t heard of the CONSTITUTION
Assembling is only legal if you ask permission first apparently
He only got a warning because they knew they were false in their stop
in the second video you can clearly see the cops were fish for anything. Why did the lady cop have to take a photo of him? Just just so corrupt and out fishing and came up short on all counts.
I noticed that! Pure harassment. I would have hidden my face.
That should have been surely illegal, as he was inside his car, being forced to have window lowered for tint meter allegedly.
Statute of limitations.
Ticket is now void!
hearing a police chef use the term " Protesting permit" is wild.
Sounds like the police investigator is either incompetent or malicious in his handling of evidence, and either needs to lose his LEO cert (and never be allowed to be a LEO ever again) or be charged with a crime for withholding/manipulating evidence.
Chief needs a treadmill Desk
The Famous Mr "Turner" (v Driver) does it again! 😂
Lol, I can swear I saw a battousai video where a cop was trying to make him id for filming. He told the cop it was lawful to film them, and the cop said something to the effect of "you need to learn the law better"...lmao😂. If I remember right they threatened him with arrest, so he told them his name, and you could see the cop instantly knew he f'ed up.
We don't have rights anymore, we have privileges in this country.
I gotta get a freakin dash cam, man...
The entire concept that you have to get permission from the government to protest the government is absolutely antithetical to the idea of this country and I find it completely f****** absurd that that's not something brought up more
man. chief just couldn't be cool about it. these protesters were incredibly reasonable, and chief tried to turn it into a real shit show.
I feel like as long as their not bothering people, they should be fine
I just wanna know why the chief is wearing those gigantic overalls for 😅
He was too busy listing types of shrimp dishes to find his uniform?
I wanted to know that too. 🤔
no belt would fit him so he straps his tent-sized pants to the shoulders.
Because he couldn't fit in the smaller pair of overalls.
So he won't get doughnut glaze all over his uniform
"How far were you from the other vehicle?"
"As far as i needed to be"
"How far were you from the other vehicle?"
"I don't answer questions."
Last time I checked, the Constitution doesn't say anything about needing a permit to protest.
The cop's excuse is that they have so many people protesting that they are blocking traffic, yet HE is the one who's got traffic blocked with HIS vehicle.
Absolute hypocrites!!!
I find it very interesting how some cops can remain calm around armed citizen without feeling the need to disarm them.
When you give them to much power they will abuse It... even a little bit of power they will abuse it... take law enforcement powers away I say..
Hearing you say Battousai cracked me up every time. Not that you said it wrong or anything, the imagery that it inspired in my mind was quite funny. Great content as per usual. Keep grinding, brother
There is a big problem right here. How is this not seen as an obvious conflict of interest. The law as written gives the police chief the ability to deny any permit for any gathering that he/she does not care for(such as a protest of police practices for example). This is clearly a poorly written law. Putting such a decision in the hands of one person is just ripe for misuse. 6:42
Exactly! It’s so absurd!
Thank you for showing the truth!
hahahaha the cops face in the end when the driver just rolled out not answering the last question hahahaha.
Thank you for the second video. I do appreciate also seeing encounters that end well.
Why is this Chief working while 9 months pregnant? He needs to be induced. 😮
🤭
At least on bed rest.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀🤦🏽♀
😂😅😂
Nine? That's not a day less than 12.
I've lived here in Washington DC for 59 years now, and here is the ordinance on protesting in the nation's capital: "You'll need a permit to demonstrate on federal land if you have 25 or more people. Exceptions: Up to 500 people allowed without permit at Franklin Park at 13th & K St NW, or McPherson Square at 15th & K St NW. Up to 100 people allowed on the green space at 18th & H St NW." Those exception spaces have protests there daily. A rinky dink town in this video should not be allowed to overtly violate the 1st amendment with some trumped up ordinances. These protesters would surely win their case....eventually. But because our city, local and state judicial system is so corrupted, it will cost them lots of money spent on their case in order to get justice.