"Does God Exist" Debate with Sivarama Swami
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 июн 2015
- On the 19th June 2015, HH Sivarama Swami had a mock debate on the existence of God at the Pandava Sena Alumni program. HG Bhuta Bhavana prabhu played the role of an aggressive atheistic interviewer (Jeremy Paxman, Richard Dawkins style) but HH Sivarama Swami soundly defeated him.
The many devotees present in the audience were really inspired and found it very educational in how to defend the existence of God.
For more info visit alumni.psena.com
This is the beauty of Hinduism, we can debate on the very existence of God, unlike other religions.
You don't have to condemn other religions .. they have own way
this is not hinduism!! this is Sanathan Dharma,,,,,
Didn't even realize the interviewer was acting! Great debate. So many questions brought forth and answered. Would love to see more of this.
I am still in shock hahaha I still don’t know if he is or not hahaha such a good job of acting.
Good. The Swami has the stomach for the debate. It is good to get believers or practitioners to allow the faith to be put on trial. I appreciate the Swami's handling of the challenges.
he comes with Vedic knowledge which has answers for everything unlike abrahamic religions which just can't answer certain topics
@@NylonStrings83 mate dont look down upon other systems of faith, at the end of the day we are all wanting to realise our relationship with god
Sivarama Swami Maharaj ki Jai 🙏
Hare Krishna ❤️
A tip : you can watch movies at flixzone. Been using it for watching loads of movies lately.
@Marvin Rodney yup, been using flixzone for since november myself :D
Superb! Bhutana Prabhu so accurately portrayed an atheist, when I was watching I didn't even realize he was acting.
Perfect logical questioning with perfect logical responses. Applause to Sivarama Swami and his preaching efforts!
I saw his tilak
Hahaha bhutana pr 😂😛😂😂
Every one who enters Iskcon they made to put Tilak to represent every one are part of god
In Mahabarata, Krsna says that He has left clues of His existence all over the world.. you need eyes to see..... it comes from a heart that is purified over time. Ego is in the way. We want to be controller, so we go on playing 'we are king' in the material universes lifetime after lifetime...and all the time the grahas (devas) are controlling everything through our minds, according to the results of our karma (out past actions) We want to 'know' about God, first we have to know our situation! most people are ignorant even of that!
Love it... Wonderful mock debate. All believers in God should practice like this.
But Christians and muslims don't because their religion encourages them not to question their book.
despite what it looks like superficially, the exponents of this hare krsna movement have the deepest reservoir of knowledge in creation
exactly
He is talking very limited forms of gita without doing yoga u can't achieve higher concessioness after achieving higher u can find god
you are showing a narrow mined understanding of the gita. also you have not understood the process the swami has presented. please get your facts right before you make wild inaccurate statements.
@@dharmarajadasa5960did you read the comment?
@@conker9529 yes have you?
Krishna says only by devotional service can I be known, so only by devotional service can he be known. You can't create your own process and expect to know God
Gotta love Sivarama Maharaja
What I really loved about this is how much Sivarama Swami & Buta Bhavana das enjoyed their 'debate', and how well BB stayed 'in character'. Good points were made. Thank you
Maharaja did debate with some scientist guy a few years back ... google it, you might find it CommonSense
send it or share the link or name the video plz ji
@@tomelectronics3215 This is one debate
ruclips.net/video/qMuHMVVoPjw/видео.html
When he asked "who are you, what is your personality". He won right then
The guy would have won if he'd asked the same in return..
@@thethreespikes9737 no because in bhagvat gita it is explained who we are and what is our purpose here and his divine srila Prabhupada had explained this topic numerous times u can watch it on vanipur media it is there you tube channel. Hare krishna ❣️
@@thethreespikes9737 nope , cause he would have said " I'm the personality which is not this body but soul , that means he can understand god". Past life connects all dots of everything.
Haha 😆 at the beginning i was like "oh wait what's going on? Then i figured ou that the Prabhu is acting like an atheist ... 🤣 Haha Swami is 👍 awesome. 😂 Haha "You ere going to mix up all in the laboratory" hahah so funny...thanks for this meaningful nice debate 🙏🌈 Hare Krishna
yes but the Guru is not very good at answering, i think so
Jay Shetty before he became a monk , before hare Krishna? Surprised to see him during this amazing debate 🙌🏽
Lucid and brilliant logic by HH Sivarama Swami..!!!
Maharaja had him defeated in the first 2 minutes (or practically from the first sentence.) The rest was just rehashing over and over because the other guy kept going around in circles. Anyway.... love getting a chance to see the Swami do his thing.... God exists and while we may not be able to see him and we need the qualifications to understand him, there is so much that is unexplainable if we are stubborn and won't even consider looking at the evidence that comes by looking at the ""big picture.".. Thanks for posting this...
Only with KRSNA can we have eternal life, Hare KRSNA.
Looks like Arjuna who is a devotee asking questions to Krsna. Bhuta bavana prabhu is really a great devotee.
Loved this discussion and watched it many time🙏 Swami ji gave a lot of things to consider about Lord Krishna 🙏 Hare Krishna to all🙏❤️
Vicky Shrivastava; Krishna a chore, violent to encouraged to ydh and mass-murdering 100 Kauravas. Satyemeva Jayete.
Everybody ask, does God exist? But nobody ask what is existence.
What is it?
@@Mark1Mach2 Since you would have to exist to know existence and since it is consciousness or awareness that allows you to know that you exist consciousness is existence.
A very nice "debate". It is really a shame that Christian philosophers have entertained debates with atheists for hundreds of years. The fact is that perceiving God requires qualifications.
Such statements quickly shut down a "debate". Maharaj did a wonderful job.
+Ankur Sethi for a god like brahma who resides everywhere in every atom every molecule he must be something that is empirically verifiable, like for verifying the existence of boson certain experiments could be performed that could that reveal it's mass and other properties but there is no such evidence of Brahma .Moreover the sour glass of water can be verified if it was sour by a ph meter and other experiments whose result everyone can see.The atheist guy failed on correct spontaneous answers which gave way to Maharaj to easily take him down.
+Ankit Mehrotra You have many false assumptions.
The point is you can perceive Brahman by purified senses and consciousness. There is a process to follow. Someone's failure to be qualified does not "PROVE" anything.
Do you know there are many things you can perceive by taking LSD and psychedelics that are said to expand your consciousness but are those things for real? No.Something such as Brahma, you claim exist everywhere, must be perceivable under normal state of mind to anyone, just like under normal state of mind anyone can see the wave nature of electron by y.d.s.e experiment no matter who performs it.
+Ankit Mehrotra It is perceivable under all circumstances, but you need to be qualified. an unqualified person cannot understand many things. God is one of them.
how is it different from taking drugs and seeing things that no one will ever see in his normal course of life?And how is it different from the black big snake which has lifted the entire earth on his head, but you don't see it because you don't qualify to see it? bro Real things have real effects beyond the boundaries of our head, fairies may sing and dance in our head but for them to exist they must have some direct effect and emperically verificable presence outside our mind.Ask yourself and your qualified saints if they can point out to anything of that order to prove that what they are perceiving is something more than their own imagination.
Very good conversation with swamiji.. Hari bol🙏🙌🙌💕
Hare Krishna prabhu! Please enable captions as some of us cannot understand
Hari Hari! Amazing debate. Koti Koti Dandavats!
My brother daughter she was born 15 days later than normal delivery period , when she born she could not take the breath she was taken to hospital giving oxygen mask 100 kilometers away
She was operated right after birth
What is this is it by chance ?
What is the cause of chance , ?
Krsna says i am the origin of everything ,so Krsna is the origion of chance even
What we do not understand we call it chance, rather it is act of prakrati doing all action
No dear chance is a very vague term. Chance is something that we believe we have no influence over. Like how many people i will meet today. Because world is a disordered system. Very difficult to formulate it, likely immpossible.
In case of your niece being born with a birth defect and the cause of it is likely encoded in her DNA or her mother or external factors. If you truly want to know why your niece had this problem, you must be ready to explore all the reasons behind it. Rather than playing make belief.
Harekrishna maharaj please accept my humble obeisancies at your lotus feet
This swami is amazing. The guy doesn't know himself but wants to question God. My Goodness.
It is a fact we Don t know what we are , don know our past , present and future and question god
@Gold Shine
Why? When?
@Gold Shine brother you are not wrong .... Yes materialistic illusions vreats such things as in your mind.... This notion is not new... It also very much old.....
Okay.... Before commenting on religion or any kind of vedas or krishna.... Keep aside all.... Have you ever ask yourself? Why you are? For which purpose? By whom?
And fir your kind information.. 1)Religion and dharma is not same.... Krishna is the topic of dharma beyond religion.,..
2)Krishna means he who attracts all.....sk whoever ever experienced this supreme attraction..... Get the company of krishna..
@Gold Shine yes one of the gaudiya vaishnava acharyas....
@goldshine930 why will God not create religion for the benefit of his children
I have heard once one guru saying that Vedas state that there is a law in this universe that the product of the source can never have more BASIC FEATURES than the source itself. It can have fewer features but never more. So, by combining 2 colors (3 sources: 2 colors and something or someone to combine them) we will get another color but never a sound, so we do not come from some inner matter or from amoeba. The original source must be alive, conscious, intelligent, with powers beyond our imagination, must have a Form and be formless at the same time because the original source must have in itself all the elements of creation.
amazing debate. amazing swami.. better get started on that experiment!
Yes!
dear guru ,you have excellent passience. i don't think indian guru have passience like that you.
..........hare krinshna.............
dear atheist ,,you mess with wrong guy.
Bro he is not an atheist. He is a follower of Hare Krishna himself. He took the role of an atheist and he did a fantastic role with it.
Who don't know you you are and you're challenging who God is? Wow! OK, I'm considering seeing him live in London today and I think I'm sold! :D
great!
Yes, that’s true. The biggest problem that in schools and universities we don’t study who we are, thanks God Vedic astrology and sciences are developing spreading quickly. But you can’t find yourself without knowing who you are((. Just spare of time
There are some rare great schools that teaches vedic wisdom from childhood actually. And they are well renowned schools as well.
I think its fair that the man takes Swami's words and at least try out the experiment, swami is certainly more qualified.
Jai Sivaram swami 🙏🙏Hari Hari 🙏🙏
Hare Krishna
Hare krishna
Iskcon is wonderful
Swami ji nailed it 😍😂
Hare krishan
'Way of life' is not religion!
It is based upon dharma... Which is not religion
24:32.....hey jey shetty is here and in 33:34 Radha shetty is there.
(Y) Superb!
Experiment you do.
We directly her from Krsna and act and experience
Plz switch on subtitles
Discussion on Mahabharat at 41:42
Ha yes, gotta love Shriva rama - 'you are just asking why bad things happen to good people'.. (actually just as important, why do good things happen to bad people!!). Actually he is mixing up bystander behaviour - there is social psychological reason why bystander do not help!
Prabhuji is like playing to role of a first grader trying to understand 10th grade subjects
Anyone notice on thing Jay Shetty at 24:33 in light green shirt.
Guruji great and saveg reply😂
It's not just an individual's karma at play all the time. There are many forces/ many karmas in the universe and the resultant outcome is the net effect of all those karma's at play . There is family karma, community karma, state's karma etc . For example if you are born to rich and influential parents , you will have a comparative easy life ( because the struggles your parents did to accumulate wealth , you will get benefit from it ) . Similarly if your family did bad to others , they may try to avenge it through you/ harm you . After Pearl Harbor attack , many Japanese Americans were sent to concentration camps . In this example the bad karma of a nation state ( Japan ) affected its subjects . Also the Geeta says not doing the right action at right time ( Akarma) or lack of karma may also lead to less favorable outcomes . In the example asked , it's not only the lady who was attacked had individual karma at play , but also of the state and the mute spectator's akarma at play . The state let it happen : the police were not vigilant enough to control the thugs ( their lack of action ) , and neither did the mute spectators help. This will lead to bad karma for the state , if it can't control law and order at a large scale, it may disintegrate. Similarly if the spectators didn't help the lady , there will be a time when the goons get more courage ( knowing that people don't help victims ) and attack those mute spectators for robbery etc as well .
experiment at 40:30
The fact the Swami had stated we are servants of God just provides proof that this idea has distanced itself from Santana Dharma and has the closeness to Christianity. I will not use the word Hinduism as this is the British terminology to catagorise and dissect the identity of what is India today.
We are the servents of Shree Krishna.
Baghavad Geeta 9.13
mahātmānas tu māṁ pārtha
daivīṁ prakṛtim āśritāḥ
bhajanty ananya-manaso
jñātvā bhūtādim avyayam
Translation:
O son of Pṛthā, those who are not deluded, the great souls, are under the protection of the divine nature. They are fully engaged in devotional service because they know Me as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, original and inexhaustible.
Bhagvad Geeta 9.34
man-manā bhava mad-bhakto
mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru
mām evaiṣyasi yuktvaivam
ātmānaṁ mat-parāyaṇaḥ
Translation:
Engage your mind always in thinking of Me, become My devotee, offer obeisances to Me and worship Me. Being completely absorbed in Me, surely you will come to Me
And the whole 9 chapter specifically Krishna tells about bhakti. Bhakti is devotional loving service to lord Krishna. And we are eternally his servants. Your comment provides proof that you have not really read any scriptures of Sanatan Dharma and just are following your own interpretation of things without checking what's given in the Vedas. He is speaking in English that too to an atheist so he used the words servant of lord. Now speaking in English can't be co-related to Christianity.
Bhakti itself means doing something for God in the mood of love or show love towards him and by doing so lord gets happy and we get more happier then Me , and because we serve lord in loving mood devotional way we are his servants that's why in vedic we call ourselves as das !! The lord is the boss and we are his employees and what not u can call but it does mean we are serving him and together relishing it !! So I hope u got it !! It's not Christians Muslims or hindus it's about the identity of the soul !!
Swami's insistence on the man's qualification is doing nothing but justifying Swami's job of being someone who could help people reach God.
Since you can't know who God is and can't understand who God is then how can God expect you to follow his will.
+William Reichert what is the basis for your statement that one cant know who god is and what his will is?
+Dharmaraja Dasa
The better question is what is the basis for your belief that you know who god is and what is his will.
It is apparent by the vast number of religions in the world that a multitude of ideas of God's will and his identity
exist. If God is the ONE then these ideas are in conflict and by extension are false. Knowledge of God's identify and his will
appears to be beyond the capability of mortals. If you possess the "truth" in these matters, it can only be a matter of personal faith not a matter of knowledge.
DO you claim to know who God is and what is his will?
I need to change my statement to the more accurate proposition that since I can't know who god is and I can't know his will than I can't be expected to follow his will. If god wants to punish me for not following his will
but will not tell me what his will is then god must be a sadist.Perhaps there is someone who knows who god is and what is his will. I can accept that. But I have not met such a person.
The external aspects of different religion maybe different but the essence is the same which is !) There is a God 2) We are his servants 3) We worship God by chanting his holy names.
If you do a serious investigation then you will see this commonality in all religions.
God is known through his word (i.e. scripture), I follow the Bhagavad Gita which tells me who God is and who we are and what our duty is?
If you are sincere and scientific then please invest in a copy of the Bhgavad Gita As It Is which can be purchased from amazon and then investigate it..
Spirituality is also objective and for which there is evidence of being verified.
An intelligent person will never want to rebirth and face all kinds of material problems, because we have the ability to understand God , we can make connection with God and attain moksha, u r saying all these from the left hemisphere of ur brain please try to think from the Right hemisphere, u will have a clear and overall picture.
@@dharmarajadasa5960
Yes. I can accept. the notion that 1, There is a God. and 2 We are his servants. and 3 One can worship God by chanting his name .
But doing those things does not allow us to know God's. will.
Certainly God has the power to reveal his will to all mankind. But He has chosen not to do this.We are left to imagine what is will is. However, different people imagine God's will to be different things. Apparently God wants it to be this way. To each his own. We are on our own to figure this out. Maybe when we die. we will have this all explained. Maybe not.
Jay shetty 53:35
Fortunately Lord Krishna advised Arjuna to kill Duryodhana and his supporters without thinking of any relations.
Duryodhana and his 99 Kaurava brothers were killed in the war. 10-6-2021
Samir Supnekar; Truthfully it makes Krishna violent and a mass murderer. Satyemeva Jayete.
@@prosantomukerji3931 ok so killing people who want to kill u is murder then, u r impractical & a soft snowflake
Blaming the victim argument.
Question: if god controls everything, why does the world have bad. Why do we also have bad. When god created these two people - one good and one bad. Just to clarify - not just talking about this life but the journey of those rwo souls through different bodies doing good karmas and bad karmas thru different lives. Why did bad get created
Bad gets created due to free will of people. God has provided enough for all people to satisfy their hunger, but why some people die by hunger? It's because other humans are hoarding, not wanting to share, gaining monopoly, establishing ownership on already existing natural resources, diverting and exploiting resources. God has no part in the cruel selfish intentions of people. That is our free will. With this free will we can become generous, kind, merciful, do charity, treat everyone equally, share food and resources etc. But we choose to do the bad thing hence we create bad.
Also, God isn't controlling everything actively all the time, but he is the Supreme controller. Example: We created motor. We switch it on. It starts working due to functioning of it's internal mechanics powered with energy, supply of energy amd creation of mechanics is also done by us, but after we turn the motor on, it starts working automatically, eventually we turn it off. Here, the Supreme authority and control over the motor is we humans that is turning it on or off. But the functions of mechanics happening is partly independent with the flow of time, we created those mechanics expecting it to function in a certain way but the motor can dysfunction as well. If there is any problem in the mechanics, we fix it, and start the motor again. But the coordination between the different parts of the motor r partially independent. Here the example is given of a non living thing which has no free will. It is just for understanding. While if we replace ourselves with the motor, we have free will. Which makes us more prone to doing dysfunctional activities(sins, materialism, hurting others, etc.) which is not our actual function that God expected while creating us. This body is the motor. But it has consciousness, power of which we r abusing all the time. I hope i was able to clear some of ur confusion cuz clearing confusion on such deep topics ain't easy on texts and comments.
@@keshavsikdar9284 very nice explanation. Very logical. 🙏
@@Mark1Mach2 thank you :)
basically, it means if you dont know anything then that is god
There is the main problem of all atheists that they have the wrong attitudes and negative emotions toward God and devotees because they are envious they have very narrow mindsets and narrow visions and they are arrogant and full of hatred. May Krishna bless them so they can be a good human being first.
I don't think this guruji has a clue about the so called law of induction. Just because everything we know had a cause, doesn't mean that every other thing has a cause. Coming to such conclusions is just another belief, a belief in the "law of induction".
I think he should read Hume:
Hume asks on what grounds we come to our beliefs about the unobserved on the basis of inductive inferences? He presents an argument in the form of a dilemma which appears to rule out the possibility of any reasoning from the premises to the conclusion of an inductive inference.
Besides, the act of a coin flip may be by some one, but the turning out to be head, or tail for that matter, has no cause, and that's why it is random - without any "thing" making the choice. But a classical coin is not a purely random thing, so the "coin" I'm talking about is the Quantum coin - an example would be spin state of an electron.
Either way, belief in god or in things like the law of induction, is ultimately a belief, not a fact.
Also, it is better to have no answer than to have one that cannot be validated but requires "faith", not fact.
finally, some sanity in this comment section.
That random event also has a cause. Just show me one thing which doesn't have cause.
Organised universe cannot be come out of nothing or by chance.
@@paramsatyam1097 It's been so many years that the study of the universe, particularly of the events closer to the and of the first moment, have been showing us that there is no event, nothing, beyond.
The thing that has no cause, is the universe as a whole, the universe itself.
Can't you see? If you cannot 'see', that's your problem. Unlike you, who come up with zero evidence God theories and are in denial of there being no exlaination, we accept the fact.
"Show me, show me, show me.."
We're showing you, it's you who are blinded by your faith in the God theory, who unlike science, cannot show any evidence.
Unlike faith, science is giving you all the evidence, it's you who are unwilling to see.
You need a scientific mind and attitude to 'see'.
@@dhireshyadav1783 I have scientific mind and that's why I cannot believe in by chance theory. Where as, in Srimad Bhagavatam, it is clearly mentioned how the world has been created. Everything has been vividly discussed there. Science cannot explain to us the basic thing, which is: what is life? How are we alive? What is consciousness?
@@dhireshyadav1783 We, the people, who believe in God, have to prepare ourselves, have to read scriptures, nature's law, law of karma, everything has been vividly discussed in Bhagavad Gita.
Why Creation ?
Theist to Atheist: Everything has a cause! Give me one thing that doesn't have a cause? Atheist: You are correct everything has a cause. So it begs the qustion what caused God?... Seems like checkmate
veganath
"So it begs the qustion what caused God?"
It is lost on people. They say "everything BUT MY GOD." And they don't see it. It is called special pleading, and people are so brainwashed that they don't understand that they just threw out their entire argument.
if god had a cause then he cant be god. God is described as having no beginning or end, that is the definition of god. Science accepts that energy is eternal so why cant the source (GOD) also be eternal having no cause.
Dharmesh Teji
"Science accepts that energy is eternal so why cant the source (GOD) also be eternal having no cause."
Energy is NOT eternal. One day the universe will simply run out of energy.
Besides, you just made the best case for not needing a god. Why do we need a god? Have you ever heard of Occham's Razor?
Your rationale would also ask "Why can't there be unicorns? Or fairies? Or pixies?
Do you go around believing in everything that might be possible?
Do you believe in all of the gods that have ever been invented?
Please explain your evidence why god does not exist? So far your making assumptions.
Dharmesh Teji what you fail to realize is that atheist(the word..lol) would not exist if it wasn't for theist asserting the existence of a supernatural being who happens to be omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent & of course invisible, what to speak of having a NON-interventional stance for 99.99999% of 200,000 years since the emergence of the human species.
You see we do not have a position on the existence of anything supernatural, and so it follows that the burden of proof is with the one asserting the claim that a supernatural being of any kind exists. I could easily keep u very busy by simply asserting that
1. you have a diamond buried in your yard.
2. I have an invisible leprechaun in my garden
3. a tooth fairy took my child's fallen teeth
4. Santa Claus visited our home yesterday.
5. ......
6. .......
.
.
.
n. ....... etc, etc, etc....
NOW !!
Please explain your evidence why u believe none of my supernatural beings exist or don't exist??
Do u understand?
I enjoyed the debate but have so many questions I wish the acting atheist asked! 😅
like?
So is it good
vipond50 sorry to say but that is one of the most ignorant person i have seen just because someone knows the scriptures to the letter
That doesn't make him smart
How does he knows that the old lady is experiencing her karma alone
As a witness to her experience who makes him a judge
@@archieroopnarine76 no body makes him a judge but the rule of karma is the judging of all deeds.... He is just acknowledging
Swami Has Aron Ra's Voice
Tell me who u are?😂😂
Can a parrot chanting 'Hare Krishna' improve his consciousness?
Animals, birds are conditioned soul. Their consciousness is conditioned. That's why Human life is the most important to realise God.
Bhagavad Gita verse:
"Among forms of sacrifices I am the repetition of Holy name"
I knew the black guy was acting. I've saw him at temple. And on harinam.
answers on a postcard please ha ha .😂😘
Who do you think he is some auto carrier made me laugh 😆 like hell😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
God is in everything and everyone and everything, as an Indian we want to create an idea of creating a figurehead, God. To me this seems to be following a western view of creating an image of God, and seems to be picking and choosing the true Santana Dharma ideas of true ideas to make it a very Christian ideology of following a certain person that is created by humans that we call God. This is not true Santana Dharma but a imperialistic view of breaking and using certain things from the ancient culture that knew truth and life, and using these words and knowledge without truly understanding it.
don't think you know better than swami ji
its our ignorance and illusion
he is a correct and we are not match to him
that's true it took time for me to realize it but he is true
I never did, yet again you are following the ideas of western culture believing that one idea and one's thought is better than the other. Santana Dharma was an idea of leaning truths and understanding ones self yet, not closing minds to ideologies, this is what causes conflict as you are implying.
@@sunilthakore5715
Bro he follows brahma sampradaya, one of 4 vaishnava sampradayas. He is not allowed to change or put his own views. He must repeat what his guru has said. That's what make him a bonafide guru. Knowledge coming directly from krishna is protected in sampradayas by not diluting it by own views. So this saint is not putting his own mental concoctions of western education...instead repeating his gurus words ... palatable to general mass
He lost me after his explanation of the old lady getting attacked. What shit.
Brother some are bitter facts...
When u are inside of a flower u can never understand what is flower and how it looks only when you are outside the flower you can get it. Brother there is always a bigger picture of every situation. And you should first understand "god".
@@dhoondhliyaadein817 I don’t believe in god.
@@dhoondhliyaadein817 but nice explanation though. Honestly nice analogy
@@elliotthyde5623 you may believe or not but the reality will not change.
A Creator does exist but not in the concept that man makes it to be. God is both female and male energy God is not flesh God is purely spirit and exists and all of humanity and it works for laws of the universe and it must always be balanced the people on the Earth cannot live in chaos for long periods of time before the Earth corrects in chastise the people that lives on it. When we reduce God to be in a man then you will say stupid things like the judge scenario, the judge has put down a lot of judgments on people that have been innocent so with that being said he did not use a good example or an analogy. When we reduce God to be in the human he is filled with mistakes, when we see God/ The creator as energy and understand that very point you will know that God not only exist but lives inside you.
God is all of the above
To handle such gurus one need to understand the Indian Philosophy. They won't stand a chance once Charvaka steps into the ring.
@Language and Programming Channel haha, sure. Scientist ke paas toh bas yehi kaam reh gaya. Science debunking a negation claim ideology? Do you even know what you are talking, either you don't know science, or Charvaka or both.
Who are you brother? Are you a vedic or Hindu? Or not? Or a communist marxist?
What do you know about Indian philosophy which is now enriched by only vedanta?..... Swami vivekanand to many Vedantist are not only the face of today's hinduism but also of the whole Indian spiritual thoughts . What do you know about vedanta? But still barking nonsense?
And even for such a materialistic communist type thought called charvaka which was put into its right seat by Buddhist and jains along with ajivikas century king ago... ? 😁😁😁😁😁😁
Brother grow up and study vedanta
Go read 'bhagvad gita as it is '.... you will get answer to your so called charvak.
As per your 'such gurus' remark, you trying to show you are greater or equal than him is utter sense of ignorance you have in you. And you coming here and trying to gather attention and boast your shallow knowledge....shows how much a charvak follower you are.
This saint is a teacher of teachers. If you would have left aside your pride, would have learned something
Charvaka is Atheism & Atheism is dumbest philosophy
This video could be so much more interesting if this Swami could overcome his narcisme and arrogance and listen to the interviewer instead of attacking him al the time .....
Every thing has a cause . But only at the atomic level . At the macro level , things are random .
It took 21 years for me to understand the real fact "Humans created gods not gods created humans! "
damn 21 years wasted
Why do so many ISKON priests seem to have such large egos? Not trying to be contrary, I'm genuinely curious.
It is there personal limitations
Swami ruined him...
You don't have to listen to this. Look at Prabhupada, the founder of ISKCON: ruclips.net/video/HjZDQMNcuds/видео.html
Wow jay shetty is here, he looks like a noob lol
You need a better atheist.
This a false debate, with a real atheistic interviwer you can´t say so many beliefs as it were truth.
..bad university 😁😆
In general I have seen atheists making sensible arguments....but this dude is a complete clown.
He got riddled in his own argument.
This is totally biased. ISKCON asking ISKCON.
"Your scientist are not scientist,they have their religion based on beliefs", There I saved you 48mins of your life listening to this fool.