Too Dumb for Smart Cube? | Unboxing GAN i carry 2, GAN 2x2, Weilong Pyra
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июл 2024
- My order from @atoutcubes arrived! Let’s unbox my new GAN i carry 2, GAN 251M Pro and Moyu Weilong Magnetic Pyraminx together!
I absolutely did *not* tape my phone to a clothing/drying rack to get the top-down view. Why would you think that?
*Timestamps*
0:00 pyraminx unboxing
3:30 pyraminx solve
4:15 2x2 unboxing
6:42 2x2 solves
8:00 smart cube unboxing
10:32 cubestation solves 
Развлечения
Do you have a smart cube? Which one? 🧐
Great video
Really loved it!
And I have The Gan 356I
From waaay Long ago
I don’t really use it that often
Cuz I mostly just use my Gan 14 MagLev
Buuuut keep up the great work!
Same, (gan iCarry2)
Currently have a GAN iCarry 2, a GAN i3 and a MonsterGo AI. Planning to soon buy a GAN 12 ui and either a MoYu or a QY smartcube, have not yet decided which of those two.
10/10 📦 🔨 Subbed
Great Intro to the Video but could you be a bit louder please, looking forward to your next Videos.
Roux solver spotted 👀
I like roux btw, much more intuitive than CFOP, less algorithms, it's easier to completely avoid rotations while building the first two blocks since you have much more freedom compared to F2L phase where you must preserve the cross as well. However 🤓☝ it's not my main method, let's say I like it but just as a friend... yeah I've just friendzoned a speedcubing method
Hahaha never thought I’d hear a method get friendzoned. I researched both CFOP and Roux and tried beginner versions both before deciding which I wanted to use. I think CFOP is great and easier to grasp as a complete beginner but Roux just fits me better (yay M slices, more efficient but lower TPS, less algorithms).
First
Me when i see roux solvers:💀💀
Istg they are just doing cfop but with only half a cross.
They are quite different though. CFOP is cross > F2L > OLL > PLL. Whereas Roux is first block > second block > orientation and permutation of the corners of the last layer (CMLL) > last six edges. In other words the order is very different.
You could say the first two blocks is 2/5th of the cross and full F2L finished, however blockbuilding is still different. Building blocks is done differently than making and inserting pairs, with both more freedom in moves and in how you make the 2x3 block. Building blocks (in a roux solve) the CFOP F2L way is also very inefficient. Other blockbuilding methods it shares similarities with, more than CFOP, are Petrus and Waterman.
Unlike CFOP there are no rotations and the method is heavily reliant on M and r moves.
So in the end, very different approaches to solving the cube. Both interesting in their own way :)
Ok
@@WobblyCube First and Second Block is f2l with half a cross.
CMLL is OLL but only the Corners.
L6E is PLL but edges only.
Thats why i say that they are similar.
Roux users are also former CFOP users because CFOP teaches you on how to do blockbuilding.
I mean, Gillie Roux is a former cfop user. 2 Look CMLL uses JPerms and YPerms etc.
Some cases of roux can be done with CFOP algs.