I Remade Monsters EXACTLY as described in the book... Pt.4!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 май 2024
- The PRO SKETCH PACK is BACK!! Get $200 worth of PRO art supplies for only $99! prosketchpack.com/ (Available with split payments!)
--------------------------------
✨support me on Patreon: / jazzastudios
🖌️ GET MY APP, BRUSHES, MERCH and MORE!
➨ www.jazzastudios.com
--------------------------------
JAZZA'S OFFICIAL SOCIALS! - Follow/Sub ↴
▶ TikTok: / jazzastudios
▶ Instagram: / jazzastudios
▶ Twitter: / jazzastudios
▶ Facebook: / jazzaofficial
-------------------------------- 
Развлечения
The PRO SKETCH PACK is BACK!! Get $200 worth of PRO art supplies for only $99! prosketchpack.com/ (Available with split payments!)
I bought it just now. I wonder when it will arrive in germany.
Not sure if you’ll see this Jazza, but for future videos in this series, could you make thumbnails that don’t reveal what the characters are? As someone who likes to guess along, it does take a little bit of the fun out of it because we already know who/what it is before hand. Anyhow, love your work man! Keep it up!
Yes! 😆 Kids birthday present sorted 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Thank You Jazza 💓💓💓
Bro pls check your comment section the bots are outta hand. Aside from the fake telegram gift spam there are now also adult content spam bots copying other people’s comments to apear legit
does it work for overseas shipment, i live in the UK and really want to purchase it but i'm not sure if i can :(
Fun fact: the Terrible Terror from the How to Train Your Dragon movies is based on Toothless's appearance in the original book. Jazza's depiction looks surprisingly similar to it considering the relatively limited description
I was just thinking that! I didn't realize that they were based off toothless' original description until I saw jazza's drawing (disclaimer, I've only read part of the original book)
I’ve never read the original book so I just assumed it *was* a terrible terror. Only thing that confused me was no teeth.
Dang, I didn't even know there was a book lol.
And yeah! I noticed that Toothless' description was very similar to the Terrible Terror.
The book series of How to Train your Dragon is very different from the movie, if my memory serves me as correct. Both are masterfully written and constructed, though, and Jazza did a fantastic job.
Yes and hiccup doesn't ride him
The reason toothless looks so different from his book description is actually because when they turned the books into a movie, the only thing they kept the same is the names. They wanted to give the movies a different story
YESS the movie is just inspired by the first book but has almost nothing to do with the actual movies
Yeah tbh i don't get why they even kept the names and title. Could as well have gone all the way, this feels like false advertising
I assume movie Toothless was based more on Windwalker.
They really should have just not named the movies "How to train a dragon" as they have nothing to do with the books at all.
And show
Thestrals in Harry Potter are meant to look skeletal and evoke the idea of death, but yours looks perfect for a literally undead version. I could totally imagine it as the mount of some kind of necromancer!
they only be seen by those who witnessed death consciously
Nah i heard the description and immediately knew what it was
I love seeing the book Toothless! I got very obsessed with the books when I was younger, to the point where my dog is named "Hiccup" after the book. Something I think is worth being said is that Toothless, while he looks cute and innocent, fully talks in the books and is an absolute bitch. Like, he's a sassy little bastard and I love him
yessss
i find it hilarious that jazza's toothless looks so friendly and peaceful when in the book he's a little misbehaved goblin
He got really close just missing that little plotting mischievous grin. He’s literally such an annoying gremlin I love him.
Book toothless is The bastard and we love him for it
He’s a menace and even more so since he can actually talk
It's true. My dog acts the same way.
He gave toothless the demeanor of a dushound, but really he has the demeanor of a grumpy cat.
Also to mention: the whole HTTYD series is illustrated! You should’ve compared a Toothless illustration! I love the scribbly artwork and as the series reaches the end and becomes deeper and darker, the sketches become more detailed (though not necessarily more skilled.) It kind of represents the depressing world that has emerged and also the way Hiccup has grown and matured. It really hit because I grew up as the end of the series came out.
Same here, like perfect timing!
Possibly the best way I've seen it put, and I agree with you wholeheartedly. Those books were just something else.
I dont know if he's done this before but I think a video of Jazza drawing historical figures as they're described throughout history could be so cool. Especially for figures from perhaps thousands of years ago, who we may only have statues or old drawings that depict them
that’s actually a great idea
Sounds boring as hell
"Dachshund" is actually a German word. It literally means "badger dog", since that's what they were bred to help hunt. The original pronounciation is closer to "ducks-hund".
Really! I would have thought it was connected to "hound"
@@ursidae97Yeah hund means dog. In Dutch (my language) it's hond. Very similar.
Dachshund badger/dog
Dashond badger/dog
Just fun etymologie.
It's funny, as noone in Germany says "Dachshund", we only use the abbreviation/diminutive "Dackel".
At least where i grew up, we pronounced it a bit closer to doxh-un with an o sound before the x/cks and not a u.
Language and dialects and all that stuff is so great 😊
how many times does he say it wrong?, I'm up to 5 and I don't think I can continue the video.
I tell you, I wouldn’t trade the HTTYD movies we got for anything, but I really hope they make maybe a 2d animation mini series describing the story of the books. There’s some legit stuff in there, and the stakes get way higher.
Also “cute, innocent”
Yeah I adore both the movies and the books, but they are totally different stories with totally different stakes and aesthetics. It’s really best not to think of them as connected.
I Just want to see the original green death being accurate to the book design maybe or the hellsteether
The cute and innocent part is definitely deceptive to say the least
The how to train your dragon movies were awful.
@@drsch that first movie got me through fourth grade man… it’s magical. To each their own though
I doubt anyone will see my comment, but I vouch for the Pro Sketch pack. It has genuinely helped me improve my sketches as well as my overall drawing, which is amazing since I've tried similar things and none of them have worked. I also really love the pencil. It's genuinely worth the money if you want to improve your sketching or if you want to start out.
Future top comment
it’s nice to see some one be positive on the internet 👍
Would love to buy one, but dont want it to sit for a year.
Seen
It's the top comment now
You could do the Hollows from Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children. It would be nice to see how you'd represent them with the description they have.
oh yeah they'd be cool to see drawn
+
definitely. I watched the (poorly done) movie before I read the first three books and I had a bit of an issue when comparing the monsters in the movie to their description in the books.
Yes!
@JaydenHewitt666 I tried to read the last three but I couldn't get into them. they just didn't have the same feel as the first three. the retconning of certain key relationships really threw me off of it. I just couldn't bring myself to finish it. the third book is where it ended for me. the end of the third book is satisfying. it leaves the future uncertain, yes, but the loose ends are tied up and it feels like an ending. while I was excited to find that they had continued past the trilogy, I was disappointed at how they decided to proceed. the combination of unraveling the well earned ending of the third book, disregarding established lore, and tearing apart relationships seemingly for the hell of it made it seem like a cheap non-canon spinoff series or something. the author should have quit while they were ahead.
I really feel like one that could be done well are the greivers from the maze runner, since they’re so drastically different in the movie
YES!
Yes omg that is such a good idea please is love if he did that!!!!
I would really love to see jazza draw either the Lethrblaka or Ra’zac from Eragon using their book description
I've been asking for the Ra'zac since episode one lol, maybe your comment will have more luck
I mentioned urgals in a previous video in this series.
It would be interesting to see how jazz recreates Paolinis urgals from their description next to whatever the hell the movie made.
I think the ra'zac would be cool for that too. Whatever the movie depiction was, was cool in its own right, but not a ra'zac. Jazza would do a really cool depiction of such a putrid description.
The lethrblaka description would lend itself really well to jazzas own style. He would make a fabulous depiction of them. Honestly think they are perfect for his style.
A jazza fanghur or nidhwalar would be flat out cool, but really would just be another variation on dragons. So maybe not great for content.
Sundablaka (might not be quite right, but the shadow flappers of vroengard post-fall) would be pretty fun to see what jazza does with such a vague and ominous description.
Ra'zac would be so cool to see, the description gave me the creeps when i read the books.
I would LOVE to see some Eragon creatures/monsters! Screw the movie; they apparently never read the books when they made it! The Inheritance Cycle is one of my top three with Chronicles of Narnia and Lord of the Rings!
I thought the thestral was a lethrblaka at first
For toothless, the version Jazza drew is almost identical to the book drawing version
Edit: not to be that guy but OMFG 1.8k likes in 3 weeks with 53 replies! Tysm!
Also completely opposite in personality. Book toothless makes you wanna smack him.
@@BlewBerri yes, 100%
@Paristheninjanerd I'm just glad that they're both good individually
@@slishslash9202 i agree
If toothless (the movie version) was in the books I feel like he would be more of a windwalker
And if toothless (book version) was in the films then he would definitely be a terrible terror
But even though the books and films are quite different they’re both amazing and I love them all
Reminds me of a happier Spyro
I knew that was a Thestral in a heartbeat. Lol. I was so happy when he chose to not focus on the weird horse reptile description because some people might have done a strange half and half type of animal. Or put scales all over it or something like that or even spikes. Instead he chose to focus on more dragon like features likely since it mentioned the wings so I was happy about that!
I really like your version of the Trolloc, having the weird mix of both bird and bull made it so much more terrifying. I would love to see your interpretation of creatures like the Kalkara from Ranger's Apprentice, or the Urgals or Ra'zac from Inheritance Cycle.
Or a Myrddraal
honestly that toothless looks supprisingly like the one from the book that the author drew
Which is probably a big compliment for the author. It means they did a great job explaining what it looks like.
@@schrodingerskatze4308 yea cowel was a good writer and honestly it’s a disappointment that the films aren’t more accurate I would have loved to see it
I never knew there was books.
@@nekoboygames7786 this always depresses me the books are great but the films are more famous and as the books and films are so different nobody ever goes from the films to the books its always a pity to me
@@ka-1atmyth353 a lot more people like to watch movies compared to reading a book. Plus movies get promoted more. So yea books will mostly get overlooked. Reading can be very fun tho. I do read a lot myself. But its mostly comic books that I read
first off love your version of the trolloc. being a bit of a WoT fan, the reason the description of the trolloc was so vauge is because different clans share different features. the weapon selection is because they are also a military unit. some also have bird or human feet. love your work.
I recognized the description of the Trolloc as soon as you showed it! In the books there were different types that had either the wolf, the boar or the bird features. I absolutely love your interpretation of that where the features are all there and up to the observer to notice and describe.
I think the Thestrals in the movies are so spot on. They look exactly as I had imagined them to look and follow the description from the book very closely. Unlike a lot of other monsters and beasts where the movies took a lot more creative liberty.
When you started reading the trolloc description I was "oh, that's a trolloc", while you were drawing "yes, it is a trolloc" (you have done it justice! really nice!) then during the reveal I jumped from my chair 😅 And great job from the audience! Knowing the world of Wheel of Time, most probably most their creations do live in that universe the way they have made them 😃
That was me for the thestrals
I felt so freaking smart when I realized what it was
I wanted to explain to him that the OR is not because the creature is confusing or described by different people, but because there are many of them with many variations!
I’m not a massive fan of the first season…but I have to admit that it is pretty cool to see WOT characters entering public consciousness if only in a small way.
Never before have references randomly popped up in unrelated media I consume.
I was so happy with the trollocs
As a german I will tell you how to pronounce Dachshund ;)
Dachshund = Dachs (engl. Badger) + Hund (engl. Dog) were used to hunt down badgers. They are small enough to follow the badgers into their dens.
"Dachs" is prononced like "Ducks" (multiple birds) and
"Hund" is pronounced like "Hood", but with a short vowel and an N between the U and the D
English speakers laugh at me whenever I pronounce it as "Dachs - Hund."
Dock Sunned (getting a nice suntan on the dock) (:
I'm sorry but you are completely wrong. Dachshund is actually pronounced: Dacks-Hund
I’ve always said it like that but when speaking quickly it sounds like doxen
Just say Dackel - prunounced like duckle
THE TROLLOC MAKES ME SO HAPPY!! Thank you so much for that! LOVED Jazza's depiction! It really takes in the element of the description that I have read SO MANY times!
The second winning person's art is so amazing! What an imagination! Makes my artist fluids run. The first one according to their young age, will become miraculous with the supplies they won!
The toothless that he drew, the description is from the book, not the movie, and drawing the toothless from the book he is pretty spot on
I was going to say, because if it was the movie toothless, I was going to say whoever is describing him is a complete alcoholic
To make that more interesting, the description sounded like the small dragons from the move and show
@@jamisoncohen611 no its the exact description toothless had in the book (:
Now guys this is the real comment! Please don't like the copy, this is the original😄
I believe they based the movie toothless off of Hiccup’s riding dragon in the books. Can’t remember his name though. Wind something? The movie basically combines the two.
For everyone wondering, its pronounced Ducks-Hoond (with a short oo sound like in book). Dachs is german for badger, Hund just means dog. They were used for crawling down the burrows.
In Germany we mainly say Dackel. The "a" in the first syllable sounds like the "a" in "father", The "e" at the end would sound like the "e" in "pet" or "get." So, the approximate pronunciation would be "dah-kel." Hunters and associations however, mostly refer to the Dackel as Teckel (pronounced like the english "tackle".
so it's not pronounced dash ow-nd?
In the US: dock-sun
Just to make sure how you pronounce it here it is in phronetic transcription:
[ ˈdakshʊnt ]
@@xyreniaofcthrayn1195 nope, not at all. It's a common mistake to read the first "chs" and misread it like the German "sch" which is the same as English "sh". But it's in fact the German "ch" (pronounced kh) with an s after it, followed by "hund". Dakh-s-hund
I absolutely LOVE that you drew Toothless. I am reading the book series for the second time, now, and so can say that your Toothless is SPOT ON!! (I also like that you play a HTTYD theme song when you were revealing him)
I'd love to see Jazza draw either anime characters or obscure Disney characters. The thought of him drawing someone like Zoro from One Piece or the big whale villain from Lilo and Stich just makes me laugh so hard
Wait do you mean Gantu?
Interesting thing about the book's description of Toothless, it fits nearly perfectly accurate the look of Terrible Terrors in the HTTYD movies
Fun fact: the terrible terror model was going to be Toothless's model because that's what he looks like in the books, until they decided they wanted to do a different story so they kept the Terrors in the movies as an Easter Egg👀
It would be really interesting to see some Discworld characters, as Pratchett tends to create rather unique, exaggerated characters, I would be particularly interested in seeing what you think of Igor:
.Hands like they'd been in an industrial accident
.Looked like they'd been horrifically mutilated
.Two thumbs on each hand
Etc...
Ooh! Good idea, another character could be Om when/while he regains power:
. Theophany
. A cloud of golden horns, eagle-headed men, and bulls fusing into each other
. Shimmering golden figure
. As tall as the temple
. Fiery
Yes! I'd commented this on the last time he did this. Terry Pratchett's descriptions are great!
Agreed! Love Pratchett and his characters are so unique so would be interesting seeing what he comes up with
Even some of Lady Sybil's dragons (Errol in particular)
@@LizardWizard. I'd love to see Om
Nice to see a book accurate Toothless! The films are hardly like the books. They’re almost the exact opposite in some cases.
They're actually closer to the story of Hiccup the First funnily enough.
@@blizzardgaming7070 I’ve read How to Train Your Dragon, and How to Train Your Viking. Can’t remember if there was another I read, I just know toothless was a pathetic dragon and everyone else had cool ones. Edit: the other one I read was How to Speak Dragonese I think.
@@timehunter9467 it's told in one of the later books.
@@blizzardgaming7070 Oh right, I like the films and the books, but if the films were like the books they’d be awful tbh.
I’m enjoying the Pro Sketch Pack - the first thing I ever have bought from RUclips- as a gift to myself when I really, really needed one. I’ve adventured forth and watched your videos to learn; this video was so wonderful, to see how you use the mechanical pencils, the ink pens, the brush, the gray markers especially. Thanks so much and I especially loved seeing everyone’s artwork! I hope you invite more artwork in the future. The Thestrel was my favorite.
I encourage you to send the painting of Toothless to the author! I think you nailed the book description very well!
I'm curious how you would represent Goblins/Orcs from the different descriptions in the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings - especially if you treat the descriptions separately (i.e. descriptions of Moria orcs differently than Mordor, differently than Goblins in the Misty Mountains, etc...)
I’d love to watch you guys do the Emperor of Mankind from Warhammer!
But not from 40k, from before 30k, before he became the corpse he is now.
I think this would be really cool because it would be hard for Jazza to guess, since the Emperor can change his appearance he is described in so many different ways.
It would be really cool to see Jazza try and draw a character that has conflicting descriptions of him :)
How i would describe the emperor:
A man about 10 feet tall
Long black hair that turns gold at the roots
looks about to be in his late 20s to early 30s
Glowing golden eyes
A large "halo" behind his head as if he was standing in front of a miniature sun
Heavily adorned by think golden armor
Large royal looking cape flowing down to the ground
A large metal claw on his left hand
A flaming great sword about the size of the average man in the other hand
maybe a before and after picture :)
Yeessss
Give him multiple prompts, each one a different holistic description of the Emperor.
I guess the 40k universe could be a source of many awesome and likely confusing descriptions. We got different demons, the primarchs, nasty dark Eldar stuff, necron creations, stuff made by the priests of Mars...
Never stop selling that pack, please. Have it available forever. There are always beginner artists, the stuff is perfect and amazing, keep it available as Jazza merch, please please do
I absolutely love all these monsters, they look so flipping cool!
I got Thestral just from the description and have to say i much prefer Jazza's version of the Thestral to the Thestrals in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Right there with you
The thing is, thestrals are suposed to look kinda scary but they're really kind and gentle, there might be a ton of metaphor between this and how we perceive death or grief. I think that's why, in the movies, they prefered to go with something not that "deathly", that and also the target audience
@@muriloolianivock89 that makes sense
i realised when Jazza finished his interpretation!! such cool creatures
I agree, his thestral is very impressive. So cool!
I LOVE this series! Never fails to amaze me how the description often makes me wonder but then the picture works so well...
I guessed these 3 for 3 from the descriptions and as someone who loves The Wheel Of Time, I thought the Trolloc depiction was spot on! I love this series and always check it out when you drop a new vid, can't wait for the next one Jazza, you're so talented!
I’m so happy that I guessed the trollic prompt correctly. I’ve been listening to the audio book of Wheel of Time and it’s phenomenal!
There he is! There's our beloved common or garden toothless daydream! You've absolutely nailed him, the little menace
It looks just like him! :D
I will continue to suggest the Wicked Witch of the West for this. Should be fun to see trying to work off her description vs. what she looks like in the movie.
Tbh, I really like the videos where Jazza goes into different aspects of character design, like "what makes a character strong" or "cute". I'd wanna see him do that again (feasibly next year when he reads this comment 💀)
would love to see you draw a Kappa or more monsters from folklore
I have a massive Harry Potter book and the head of that thestral looks exactly like the one you drew and the author praised its accuracy so well done
What does it mean when I got a Thestral as my patronus?
@@novemberoscar98 somethins off
@@novemberoscar98 When it comes to the Thestral Patronus’s meaning, it is generally associated with death and considered a bad omen since only the wizards who have witnessed death and accepted the concept of death can see this creature.
I was waiting for the thestral since the start of this series! I absolutely love your depiction it’s exactly how I had imagined it when reading the books 😊
For Trolloc, the description comes across more of a general description of a species rather than a specific creature, you could take most of those drawings and create an entire town of them.
The Trolloc you made is so brilliant. I think Jordan imagined them as a varied race (they're artificially created) but your approach of looking for one creature to march all the features is ingenious!
I think a Wendigo would be cool to do for this. There are two versions though; the traditional Native American description and the version Stephen King created in Pet Sematary which has become dominant in pop culture.
@Paristheninjanerd i agree so much
I think that'd be sic. I remember being so weirded out seeing the more "Until Dawn"ish more traditional wendigo. Also, apparently most natives don't like the more modern pop culture wendigo because the deerskull and antlers are very pagan which is the opposite of what they want for their folklore
@@Big_ol_Yams I think the traditional one is more terrifying because it's more humanoid and emphasizes the origin as a human turned into a monster.
The toothless from the movie and the toothless from the first book are canonically different dragons from different time periods. The later books were written after the first film came out.
The author made it canon.
Edit: as people in the replies pointed out this is not fully accurate. Please take what they have said as truth. It's been a while since Ive read the books.
The author made elements of the movies canon not the full thing.
I've kept my original comment intact for posterity.
Ooooo really? Now i want to read the books even more
That's not quite true. There's a similar story in the backstory as an easter egg, but it's not at all identical. Wodensfang is not literally movie Toothless, and Hiccup I is not literally movie Hiccup.
X2 Dustwyrm.
They are different universes entirely, even if there is a very similar relationship to Toothless and Hiccup from the movies described from history, it isn’t canon.
@@dustwyrm It has been a while since I read the books I miss-remembered things.
Thank you for correcting my mistake.
@@kajamaja7148highly recommend the read, they’re completely different things which makes it a fun read and not like as if you’re just reading the plot of the movie. I really enjoyed them even though I watched the movie first and did have some biases at first
god i’ve been in love with the httyd films for YEARS, but the toothless drawing brought back memories of being read the books as a kid and being utterly livid and hating the movie when it came out because it was a totally different story😂
my bitterness never shows more than when a movie destroys the book it’s based on, but thankfully as i grew up i learned to appreciate and love the httyd books and films as separate entities
Your videos are always refreshing Jazza, and it's fun to see you sketch your ideas out and bring them to life.
Love seeing you work.
I’d like to suggest the creature descriptions in Out of the Silent Planet by C. S. Lewis if you guys do more of these videos. They’re all very unique and I think Jazza’s take on them would look great
Ooh, it has been so long since I read that book, but those would be awesome!
1000x yes! This book is so underrated... Third part is kind of dissaointing but the first two are great and introduce such a n interesting universe! There is also definitely too few fanarts of it.
Thanks for reminding me that I was wanting to read those!
in the books hiccup rides a black windwalker dragon, also very scrappy and funky looking but it's where I think the movies design came from because toothless in the books and toothless in the movies are two entirely difrent dragons 😅
Yes the movie is only very vaguely based off of the book
Toothless looks so adorable! Also I love your versions of these monsters. The last one was making me think more of decaying flying horse full of death and terror rather than the thing one sees when one has experienced death.
Man, I really wish all of these videos existed 15 years ago when I was a tattoo artist of the shop watching these gets my creative juices flowing and the way that you explain what you’re doing while you’re doing it is awesome
Yo Jazza just wanna say thanks for resparking my love for art! Found ya recently on here and just started drawing again after about a 5 year "break". Keep up the awesome work!!
I can't help but think that Shad was the one who deviously set the Trolloc as the prompt for everybody to draw
This video is just so entertaining and really relaxing! Its so satisfying to see Jaza casully make these extremly well made art pieces with these short descriptions!
There have been a few Pokémon that were cut from the games before release,but datamining them gives us their Pokédex enteries with small descriptions. I think that could be an interesting version of these videos, though you wouldnt have something to compare to
Maybe a universe mix up. Instead of characters art style changing it’s the settings their in. Ash Ketchum is taken to the commonwealth of fallout4, the Disney princess now trying to survive amongst the conflicts of xenomorphs of aliens and yautjia of predators, buzz lightyear and woody trapped in 40k. Or Jazza’s taken from reality to the far flung futures of Cyberpunk2077.
Damn it, I would have bet on one of the creatures from "Shadows of the Colossus". 😭 I'm loving this series!!!! Your drawings are stunning and make me keep wanting to draw for fun even if I suck!
Out of all of your drawings your thestral is my favourite I like the fact that you made snoke all around it
Oh my gosh, your Thestral is absolutely stunning! I would totally hang that on my wall. They're one of my favorite mythical creatures. Love me a bony pony!
I love that you included others drawings and depictions of that prompt/description! Your followers are so talented! Unlike myself who watches and wishes I could draw like that. Lol
I'm so happy the pro sketch pack is back! I never bought one in the last sale but now I can. And you also made a new episode of one of my favourite series. This day just got 110 times better!
😂😂😂🎉! The toothless dragon was my favorite in line of cuteness but then in the darkside the last piece of horsedragon was very good nice art work! They should have hire you for hairy potty 😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉
I knew the description of the Trolloc immediately and the depiction was amazing. I loved the interpretation of the description as being separate accounts as it was definately how it felt reading. Was difficult to imagine it and I feel like you synthesized it so well!
so glad you did this on paper love watching you guys draw irl
I’ve just recently discovered your channel and I have to say this is my favorite series you do! I love to see the monsters based on traditional mythology. Could you do some from the Norse Eddas?
Thankyou so much for making the pro sketchpack it as given me sooo much joy
Hey Jazza, I wanted to say how excited I am to be getting the sketch pack. I haven't been able to draw for years. I had a mental break and years of depression, and I lost a bunch of my art stuff when I moved. I'm feeling enough better to try having hobbies again, and I'm looking forward to the sketch pack getting here as kind of a reboot. Thank you ❤
I wish he showed a pic of book toothless to compare to his version, since that's where the description is from
Same. The whole series is illustrated!
Jazza! Thanks for creating content that I really enjoyed. Over the years I followed your journey. Today I am very happy to be able to do something that I enjoyed doing both Animations and illustration Your serious have amazed me 😊
Love seeing community entries! Hope to see more in the future :)
I just discovered this series and I love it!!! Please do more of these as you are doing a lot of monster characters from books justice!!! And it is fun to guess them when you draw them
I would love to see Jazza draw a Fathier from Star Wars The Last Jedi. They’re one of my favorite creatures and honestly so unique.
I am new to watching your videos and I’m excited to have found them! This is such a great series!
I wasn’t able to get it before so I am so happy the pack is back!! Thank you jazza!
your art style is so similar to a book series i’d did for when i was younger and im living for it so much
The Toothless that you drew was the book Toothless not the movie one
I never understood why they had to call the movie "How to Train Your Dragon" even though most of the stuff shown wasn't part of the source material.
It felt like half the characters in the film weren't in the books and the other half had been altered in ways that made them unrecognizable without their names.
Yes, that's the point of these videos. Drawing characters as described in the books
Don't get me started on Toothless. The books are goated. He should totally do more HTTYD, and compare to the book artwork too.
This is my favorite book! I'm glad someone has finally done this!
I love Jazza’s version of Toothless 💚😆
How have you managed to create a dragon that looks cuter than toothless? 🥺
Because he IS Toothless! Widdle Toothless is the cutest dragon of all!
Have you seen the baby dragons in the third Spyro game? Play the Reignited Trilogy! There's one that picks his nose when the thinks the elders aren't looking. lol
I’ve suggested this before, but I would love to see Jazza draw the Babadook by description! I learned it has a book & a movie if that helps :)
This is one of my favourite series on your channel. So fun! 💜
I LOVE this series! Please keep doing them!
You did really well with the Thestral from Harry Potter. That's exactly what I imagined when I was reading the books.
Try to draw biblically accurate angels. I'm curious to see how you'll draw then from how there described
Yeah! We need this as a video!😄
🥹🥹🥹🥹THANK YOU FOR DOING MY SUGGESTION!!!! It really made my day! And I feel like you’re rendition was more book acurate! Thank you so much!
Love your art, been whatching your videos for years!
Please do something from the stormlight archive!
Omg that'd be incredible!
He should of done War Of The Worlds. Great book, amazing detail. If he does a second I hope he chooses this comment to draw.
Classic book
I'm waiting for his take on a martian fighting machine as well
I love this series so much!!!
I'm very hurt of the fact that toothless is called a monster
Dude that Thestrel is so freaking gorgeous!
The description told me “I think I remember something like this from way back when I read one of the Harry Potters” but had completely forgotten these creatures existed. They were beautiful and somber in the movie, but yours is downright badass, while still keeping so much elegance too it. A very gothic monster!
I always enjoy these character design sessions, they remind me of old Draw with Jazza times, and also of Paladin and Larry and the gnomes games Jazza created. With these new facilities and never ending inspiration, it would be wonderful to see new game from Jazza.
Could you please do The Wendigo from Algernon Blackwoods book because it’s not like the wendigo you see in most media it’s rarely seen and mostly described as an analogy for the terror of the nature around the hunters. I would also highly recommend the book!