Here is the thing- apart from all the other aspects of the Post Office scandal the role of Lord Neuberger in the Recusal seems to have escaped attention. I have therefore pasted the following ‘The role of Lord Neuberger in the recusal fiasco (Justice Fraser) should be investigated’ on as many RUclips articles as I could, about ten, but when I checked to see if there was any response I discovered they had all been taken down This Kafkaesque episode staggers one at every turn, even when Big brother has been outed he seems to be still working away! I really want to know why Lord Neuberger interfered , if the recusal had succeeded the whole noble attempt at taking on the stinking system would have failed
I'm sorry if you missed the play on words. If you are "supreme", by definition, there is nothing higher than you are. So the UK "supreme" court is not, in fact, supreme. Prior to entering the EU, if was not an inferior court.
girandole Ex Rothschild employee. Brother-in-law to Rabbi Neuberger. Involved in the inquiry into 'widening access to the bar', meaning encouraging immigrant communities to access and practice as barristers and judges in the UK higher courts. Do you think he's committed to the multicultural 'diversity' project?
@Johnny 666 you have Stefan Molyneux's "race realism" BS in your liked videos; seems like the jews are going to be the only ""race"" you're going to defend today
Judges do not "lead the law". Judges are like referees. Referees do not make the rules. They merely enforce the rules as they exist. Imagine referees in any particular game deciding mid-game that the rules are not fair or do not yield the desired outcome. That biases the outcome and leads to chaos. The rules change independent of the referees. So it must be with judges. They must enforce the rules as they exist and the legislative branch of government makes changes to the laws.
This is simply not true in practice. There are plenty of cases involved judge-made law as their interpretation of the law can diverge substantially from what a literal interpretation of statute would be. Not to mention situations where entirely different directions are taken by judges and later enshrined in legislation.
Here is the thing- apart from all the other aspects of the Post Office scandal the role of Lord Neuberger in the Recusal seems to have escaped attention.
I have therefore pasted the following ‘The role of Lord Neuberger in the recusal fiasco (Justice Fraser) should be investigated’ on as many RUclips articles as I could, about ten, but when I checked to see if there was any response I discovered they had all been taken down This Kafkaesque episode staggers one at every turn, even when Big brother has been outed he seems to be still working away!
I really want to know why Lord Neuberger interfered , if the recusal had succeeded the whole noble attempt at taking on the stinking system would have failed
Why don't you bring in Lord Sumption?
Thank You.
Wonderful interview. I have followed your career with interest and your judgments.
What an interesting interview!
So capivating.. Exeptional
Watch 'Theberton's new video - The Met Police: Diversity is Our Strength?
What an absolutely incoherent Judicial philosophy
If you refer a case to the European Union court, are you still the supreme court?
Yes. It's a matter of jurisdictions.
Robert Promm
The UK has stated, post-Brexit, it will still adhere to the ECJ rulings and judgements.
I'm sorry if you missed the play on words. If you are "supreme", by definition, there is nothing higher than you are. So the UK "supreme" court is not, in fact, supreme. Prior to entering the EU, if was not an inferior court.
he's got a german surname.
girandole
Ex Rothschild employee.
Brother-in-law to Rabbi Neuberger.
Involved in the inquiry into 'widening access to the bar', meaning encouraging immigrant communities to access and practice as barristers and judges in the UK higher courts.
Do you think he's committed to the multicultural 'diversity' project?
girandole , more of Hungarian :)
Autumn Quite so. Anything hinting at Judaism brings the anti-Semites out of the woodwork.
@Johnny 666 you have Stefan Molyneux's "race realism" BS in your liked videos; seems like the jews are going to be the only ""race"" you're going to defend today
You're also subbed to the founder of the Proud Boys lol; what I don't get is, why are you turning on your fellow nazis?
Judges do not "lead the law". Judges are like referees. Referees do not make the rules. They merely enforce the rules as they exist. Imagine referees in any particular game deciding mid-game that the rules are not fair or do not yield the desired outcome. That biases the outcome and leads to chaos. The rules change independent of the referees. So it must be with judges. They must enforce the rules as they exist and the legislative branch of government makes changes to the laws.
This is simply not true in practice. There are plenty of cases involved judge-made law as their interpretation of the law can diverge substantially from what a literal interpretation of statute would be. Not to mention situations where entirely different directions are taken by judges and later enshrined in legislation.
Fat cats getting about £ 350.000 a year for doing little. LoL xxoo
imbecile. I'd like to see you do what they do.
You are disgustingly ignorant of what these people do. Educate yourself before you make such a rash and incorrect judgement.
Get a job that pays you better you bum
Who elected this guy?
UK judges aren't elected, they're appointed, and not by the general public. We don't play political football with our legal system like the US does.
@@autumn4142 Which is why our Judges still have their brains!!!