another point, the 50 is NOT the widest for the v system, natively they go as wide as 40mm, but the SWC (super wide) has a 38mm lens permanently affixed to the body; those are NORMAL wide lenses, a fisheye 30?, I think was also for the 500 series cameras.
Great update TB. Your research and delivery is outstanding. Do appreciate your time researching and sharing your insights with the analogue community. All the best.
Thank you! Happy you found the content useful. They are brilliant cameras with an awesome history and should be used (not shelf queens). It is just fun to “research” what you thing is cool!
Nice! There is one guy on YT that has a brilliant Hasselblad buyers-guide and some pitfalls to avoid: Nico from Nico´s Photography Show named “How to buy a Hasselblad || Buying Guide”. Then I know people like Peter Elgar has a brilliant video named “An Expensive BOX -- the HASSELBLAD 501CM”, heck even Matt Granger has a personal Hassy. So there is some really grate information out there on YT!
I had the Hasselblad 500 C/M camera, but I got tird of the blackened top view in the finder when using a macro or tele lens, so I got the Hasselblad 2000 FC camera and l got the lenses Zeiss Distagon 50mm 2.8, Zeiss Planar 110mm 2.0, Zeiss Tele-Tessar 350mm 4.0 and Zeiss Mutar 2X, a great set of lenses, I can very highly recommend these 3 Hasselblad F-lenses plus the 2X ! For the 500 C/M camera I had the Zeiss Macro-Planar 120mm 4.0 and the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 250mm 4.0, but the Zeiss Planar 110mm 2.0 with the Zeiss Mutar 2X was so good that I did not need the Zeiss Macro-Planar 120mm 4.0 and Zeiss Tele-Tessar lenses 250mm any more.
Hasselblad lenses are made by Zeiss, Schneider, Rodenstock, Kilfitt, Ross, Kodak etc. The Hasselblad bellow do fit on a 500 EL/M by turning the bayonet 45 degrees. The leaf shutter in the lenses is a COMPUR shutter. You should have done your homework.
another point, the 50 is NOT the widest for the v system, natively they go as wide as 40mm, but the SWC (super wide) has a 38mm lens permanently affixed to the body; those are NORMAL wide lenses, a fisheye 30?, I think was also for the 500 series cameras.
Great update TB. Your research and delivery is outstanding. Do appreciate your time researching and sharing your insights with the analogue community.
All the best.
Thank you! Happy you found the content useful. They are brilliant cameras with an awesome history and should be used (not shelf queens). It is just fun to “research” what you thing is cool!
Just discovered this, thanks for that.
You're welcome, hope it was useful info.
I am not a Hassy aficionado but will begin my quest very soon.
Nice! There is one guy on YT that has a brilliant Hasselblad buyers-guide and some pitfalls to avoid: Nico from Nico´s Photography Show named “How to buy a Hasselblad || Buying Guide”. Then I know people like Peter Elgar has a brilliant video named “An Expensive BOX -- the HASSELBLAD 501CM”, heck even Matt Granger has a personal Hassy. So there is some really grate information out there on YT!
Great review 👍🏾
Thank you very much!
I had the Hasselblad 500 C/M camera, but I got tird of the blackened top view in the finder when using a macro or tele lens, so I got the Hasselblad 2000 FC camera and l got the lenses Zeiss Distagon 50mm 2.8, Zeiss Planar 110mm 2.0, Zeiss Tele-Tessar 350mm 4.0 and Zeiss Mutar 2X, a great set of lenses, I can very highly recommend these 3 Hasselblad F-lenses plus the 2X ! For the 500 C/M camera I had the Zeiss Macro-Planar 120mm 4.0 and the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 250mm 4.0, but the Zeiss Planar 110mm 2.0 with the Zeiss Mutar 2X was so good that I did not need the Zeiss Macro-Planar 120mm 4.0 and Zeiss Tele-Tessar lenses 250mm any more.
Wow, that’s a cool line-up!, thanks for the input!
Hasselblad lenses are made by Zeiss, Schneider, Rodenstock, Kilfitt, Ross, Kodak etc.
The Hasselblad bellow do fit on a 500 EL/M by turning the bayonet 45 degrees.
The leaf shutter in the lenses is a COMPUR shutter.
You should have done your homework.