I checked this out in person- and immediately ordered it. I have a 34inch VESA 600 LG monitor, and it doesn’t hold a candle to the studio display- especially in brightness
@@romanbennifir6020 ...which you'd better keep until it fails because it will have 0 resale value. The Studio Display on the other hand will sell at 75% of the original price even years later, ultimately making it way cheaper
I love how He doesn't compare the studio display to anything but an Overpriced XDR and 5 yr old LG. There are much better options out there in 4k. Also the webcam and speakers still definitely don't compare to dedicated devices. Especially the webcam. The stand options where height adjust bumps it up to 1999 and non user removable power cord have no reason. But it gets an edge being 5K, and APPLE design, but its a niche product and I wish Apple had a monitor providing value to the majority.
@@dr.saimamasood8314 Yes. Great points. Best joke I ever heard: "And you can buy the pro stand for $999.00." Still guffawing about that from the Apple presenter. Yes, this new display is expensive. Yes, good advice from Max on recommending getting an inexpensive base rather than spend more for Apple's extendable contraption. Years ago, I actually had a display sitting on a very old and thick dictionary. Or you can buy the pro stand for $999.00. Hahahahahahahaha. Gets me every time.
I think that’s a good opportunity for some company start building a desk vesa mount that complements the studio display design and allows rotating for portrait mode.
good comparison. One major thing I noticed: the viewing angle changes brightness and color on the new studio monitor. It seemed worse than the older 27 iMac panel I use daily, when I tried it at the apple store. Especially looking a little downward I saw colors and brightness change much more than I am used to. Also the black levels are lacking when comparing to the new laptops or the xdr panels. Made the decision and just ordered an xdr -> better black values, more screen real estate with same size ui, working daily for 6 to 8 hours with design & photo its worth it for me.
You forgot to mention, that the 32" XDR Display is significantly larger than the 27" Studio Display. That is the main point why I ordered it as I need the space on my Desktop. Thank you for the great reviews!
I never thought I'd buy the Studio Display so I bought the Ultra Fine LG 5k from Amazon, set it up and was pleased. Then Best Buy had the Studio Display in stock out of nowhere on Friday, so I placed an in-store pickup with the quickness to compare them. First thing I noticed was that when using both monitors at the same time the LG's signal would cut out completely and never turn back on. I had to unplug the thunderbolt to reset the LG. The Studio Display was flawless (as you would guess). After a few hours I realized I would be keeping the Studio Display due to various reasons but the main reason was I needed something that will always be reliable. Just wish it was LED...to solve any height limitations, it currently sits on top of my Mac Studio 🤪
Great review. I wanted to add that dimming zones are not ideal for image editing on certain types of images where you have high contrast. The dimming zones can create artifacts (since dimming zones are larger than pixels). When I got my 12.9" M1 iPad Pro with mini LED, I thought it looked great for watching Dolby Vision movies, but I couldn't imagine doing serious photoshop retouching on it. I'm glad Apple went the route they did with the Studio Display (IPS). On another note, you could be correct the monitor's thickness is because it is (or was) destined to be an iMac Pro, but a lot of that thickness is taken up by the internal power supply. The external power supply on the (much thinner) 24" iMac is about the size of an Apple TV. This display would need a larger external power supply than that to allow 96W charging of a connected laptop...
I just added a 5K Studio Display to my collection today, which includes the Pro Display XDR. The panel is bright, the sound is good, and the camera is adequate. Much nicer than my $800 Samsung 4k monitor that I use for my work Windows computer (but then, for twice as much, it had better be!)
Another reason for they extra thickness of the frame is due to the internal power supply. You can only make a power supply so thin. Apple did not want a external power brick so they redesigned the power supply.
Please compare the Studio display to the discontinued entry level 27” iMac. Once you do this let’s talk about the price and the declining value from Apple
@@Swizzenator I received such a message too! I think my comment is at the top right now! He thinks it's some kind of scam. Between the channels a little something about the landscapes can be.
The combination of the display quality, brightness, terrific speakers, 10Gbps-capable USB-C ports and solid construction won me over to the Studio Display from a very cheap 28-in 4k display that was affected by interference from any operating webcam. As the existin 4k monitor used a VESA mount, I chose that option with my Studio Display. I generally use a boom-mounted USB condenser mic which my target audience on Zoom prefers over the built-in mic array. To get around the limitations of the webcam I use Continuity Camera with my iPhone 13 Mini and the Belkin iPhone Mount. Another viable option is Iriun Webcam (iOS and Android) with a phone on a tripod. Iriun Webcam also works with iPads.
Have noticed - very subtle albeit - shadowing across the monitor of the studio display, more so toward the edges. Especially noticeable in the highlights of moving images. An easy test is to move the window around quickly if Premiere Pro, or Lightroom. Again, minor issue to most, but concerning as it appeared to be a part of the image at times.
I’m using the Studio display in combo with a 34 inch Ultra Wide from Dell. I don’t regret my purchase AT ALL. The text on the Studio display is AMAZING! I’m a filmmaker regularly shooting 6k. So seeing my work on that glass display at 5K is awesome. The color is stunning and I love having the speakers as an extra source for audio referencing. The monitor is amazing.
This is a really good and informative review. It’s balanced and considered unlike many of the other reviews I’ve seen. If you take into account the excellent build quality, the superb display quality, the higher brightness, plus all the extra features, it’s clearly a high quality monitor with an expensive, yes, but still reasonable price tag.
The biggest problem is the Studio Display isn't as good as my MacBook Pro display. I think they hit the wrong sweet spot and bundled some features in there that most studio pros don't care about, all to hit a higher price point. Extra processor with webcam? Nice speakers? Most will already have better speakers in the studio, like reference monitors. I know I do. They should have removed the speakers and processor and hit $1000, or made it $2000 with no speakers/A13 and had a mini LED that matches the spec of the MacBook Pro.
wish apple would make an cool looking flat Ultrawide Panel. i love mine and couldnt think of anything else or oled for gaming. love both my b1 and my UW
The Studio Display is disappointing. The new MacBooks have better displays than the Pro Display XDR despite being a lower price. I think people would've been really excited if Studio Display was $1999 but had MiniLED and 1000/1600 nits.
@productivity You are correct, It's mini led and 120hz which could be a good pair for laptops with high refresh rate mini led displays such as In the 14 and 16 pro
2:17 most monitors these days come with matte coating pre installed so i think you meant lower contrast + less reflectivity. Glossy = more reflectivity and better contrast. Look up Dave2D's eve spectrum monitor video if you want to see the comparison. Yes that means apple charges extra couple hundred bucks to add matte coating while the entire monitor industry does it out of the box. Meanwhile, PC gamers would love more glossy monitor options but some reason, they decided to completely get rid of it but hopefully it'll come back. There are a few glossy office monitors though but not many.
What Apple does is not a coating, and not as coarse as a traditional matte treatment. They etch the glass surface itself, to break up reflections without introducing the image quality compromises of matte plastic or an additional layer of coating. That special process is why it costs so much. But the cost of adding it is more than I would pay.
@@onbquo you should check side by side of the apple displays. Their "nano-texture" makes the image quality look worse than the cheaper glossy model. it does downgrade the image quality
@@brightboxstudio Even if apple has their own method of creating these anti reflective displays, the end result is the same which is less reflective + worse image quality. I will always go for the glossy over their anti-reflective since it's much cheaper and has better image quality
@@loldatfunny There are major differences between a matte screen, a glossy screen, a glossy screen with nano-texture etching, and a glossy screen with anti-glare coatings. They cannot all be lumped together, because the end result is not always the same. Matte loses the most contrast, glossy has the most glare. Glossy with etching is effective, but too expensive. Glossy with the proper coatings is a good compromise between contrast and glare, and the coatings are NOT all equal. I have held up different phones against glossy laptop screens with different coatings, and some are much better than others.
Studio Display is awesome, pricey but having 5K resolution with true 2K retina it is: FINAAALLLY! And no who ask for 32" or says 4K is the same, simply don't understand how retina works.
I think the reason no other manufacturer offers displays with high-quality aluminum enclosures and other premium design features, is that Apple somehow was able to stop them from doing it. They probably told LG how they wanted the UltraFine 5k monitor to be so it wouldn't compete with future Apple monitors that were in the pipeline.
what about samsung? apple can't stop them , still they are creating ugly plasticky gamery 4k monitors , the market doesn't care about quality product just only small percentage of mac users so there is no need for the other companies to create high end 5k displays
i doubt that. few companies have invested in metal tech the way apple has. it's a signature material that they have been perfecting and iterating on for years.
I’ve been breaking my head, no one is mentioning the wattage output of the usb-c ports? What is the power? If I would like to charge my iPad pro simultaneously? Thank you in advance for the first repliers!
I myself don’t have the equipment to test the Studio Display’s port wattage, but I can make a logical deduction. Bear with me here. We know that Apple says, with the Studio Display, “you can even fast charge a 14 inch MacBook Pro”. Now, from various sources, I’ve found that the 14 inch MacBook Pro draws 73 W in order to fast charge. That means the Studio Display can deliver at least 73 W of power. However, Apple doesn’t say that it’s capable of fast charging a 16 inch MacBook Pro, and those draw more power (and come with a 140 W adapter instead of a 96 W). So we can assume it can’t deliver much more power than that.
I'm holding out for a new 6k 32" solution. In the meantime I'll just use the Studio mac with my old 27" 5k iMac -- I just need to figure out the best way to hook the iMac for display-only purposes.
i thought they took that function away after apple realized they were losing money on the display market? Let me know if you find a way, im very interested in this
@@purplekrakenyut Yes, Apple removed the option when the 5k iMacs were released. I believe you can "screen share" though that would require using the iMac as a computer as opposed to a dedicated display. There's also Luna Display, but not sure how well that works.
@@purplekrakenyut That's pure BS. Do you have insider knowledge that this is the reason? I mean, how were they "losing money on the display market" when they make no retina displays (until this month)? If people were buying entire computers to use them as displays, Apple would probably think that's fantastic! Especially since again, Apple had no displays on the display market to lose money to.
@@garfieldirwin The reason target display mode was killed was because at the time (2014) there were no cables with enough bandwidth to drive a 5K display.
@@77dris I honestly don't know, but there's little doubt Apple could have rectified the situation with a little engineering work. Guess it just wasn't a priority for them.
Hi there, I've been looking forever for the original file that Apple supplies in "/System/Library/Desktop Pictures". I keep finding converted PNG or JPEG images that are high resolution, but not the original HEIC file. If anyone with a Pro Display XDR wants to bless us with the OG file right out of the library folder (maybe zipped so it doesn't convert on Reddit), that would be amazing!
gotta admit that they look DAMN good. can gaming monitors out there get any uglier? can everyone adapt to, if not Apple's, at least dell's minimal design? not every gamers want space ships on their desk
To be honest, most people dont care how nice a monitor looks on your desk. They are using a monitor for the screen 99% of the time. I do agree though, a lot of monitors are ugly RGB vomit.
it would be great if apple made a studio display that was 32 inch. maybe next iteration. having tried a number for 4k options i finally saw the light and got the studio display. total game changer.
You still didn’t mention response time and refresh rate , it looks like you’re not allowed to talk about it, but now I got it I will go with LG ultra-wide, it is less built quality and PPI than apple’s but way better form factor, response time and refresh rate
Awesome comparison Max!! I wish Apple would elaborate more on the specs of the ASD. Been looking for monitors to go with my Late 2021 16" MacBook Pro M1 Max for over to weeks..... no luck. Everything I've looked at has a mixed bag of spec's for my needs for FCPX. The ASD is looking more & more desirable everyday. Only thing is if a jump on it, Apple will come out with something nicer in the spring.... As always, Thank You for all your hard work!! 👍😊
I saw something about someone suspecting that Apple may make an external GPU. If so, I would expect that to be put inside this monitor. It would basically allow future iPhones or iPads to be your laptop and the “dock” to hook you into heavy duty power as needed.
My question which nobody has been able to answer yet. The studio display has 3 x USB-C at 10Gb/s, fine. My question Is; can you use one of these ports as a 10Gbe Ethernet and if yes, what adapter is to be used?!
I'm really not a fan of Apple's trend toward making speakers that are more bass heavy and quieter. I will take natural clarity and overall power over boomy bass any day (bass seems like a crutch to cover up bad sound). My 27" iMac had nearly perfect sound for a built in setup. Has anybody compared the loudness to a 27" iMac? Like if an iMac was 10/10, how loud is the Studio display? Btw, that webcam is terrible for a monitor of this price with a built in a13 CPU in it! Apparently Apple says they are aware and are working on a firmware fix. Should be interesting. Also should be doable UNLESS they put a really crappy sensor/lens in it, in which case no amount of software tweaking will fix it.
I have been saving my money to buy a 5K 27" Studio display to replace my 2K 27" Cinema display on my M1 Mac Mini. I should be able to spend the $2,000, with the better stand, in about six to ten months. That would make my purchase around February 2024. I can't afford $6,000 for a monitor.
I'm just disappointed about the contrast ratio of this display. I wish further development could go into the neglected 5K panel, as 1040:1 is just really lame by today's standards. As I write this, I'm using an Apple display made over a decade ago -- and it has a contrast ratio of 700:1.
Nice job gentleman, I am very pleased to have picked up a previously owned Thunderbolt Display for $300 in excellent condition to use with my 2019 MacBook Pro and my 2017 iMac . My anticipation for the newest iMac is palpable 🥳🥰🙋🏽♀️!
Anyone who would enjoy a cheap dell monitor will not appreciate this display. Anyone who would appreciate apples design and build quality won’t care about the price. It’s a hit for sure.
A lot of people hate on the studiodisplay but it is actually a really good value! please keep making mac studio content, your's is way more in depth and unbiased than other youtubers
The only reason that won't get me to buy an apple monitor is the refresh rate. I want promotion so that's why I use a 144hz 1080p gaming monitor with my MacBook pro.
Yes it can, but not in size. Heck, even a Samsung CRG9 46" gives you more READABLE room especially when using BetterDummy ! I don't want to sit that close to teh screen !
Didn’t know about the data speed limitations of the XDR. That was really useful! I really liked the larger size of the XDR, but with data speed and built-in speakers, the studio display seems like a much better monitor for almost everyone since we aren’t looking at HDR content most of the time we are using the computer. It’s not like the web or any software/app interfaces use it. I like the accurate colors and image quality and the sharpness, but realistically, I could also just be fine with 4k 32” probably and less accurate colors and less color depth.
the fact that you cannot daisy chain either display or use a thunderbolt hub for the 6000 pro display (nor does it have a webcam, mic or speakers) is beyond ridiculous. anyone who buys either display has way more money than brains. both displays offer horrendous value
I was excited at first, but the more I thought of, the more it got clear to me, that this display is not worh it. Especially for those who don't care about using only Apple products.
Since it's been 2 years, I wonder if Apple will treat the 6K Pro Display XDR like this new 5K display but instead of putting an iPhone's internals inside of it they put an iPad Pro's internals inside instead. I'm REALLY needing a new iPad but I just have this feeling like they're going to update the iPad Pro this year and it might make more sense to wait for the update and then pick up a cheaper last gen iPad Pro or cough up the dough for the newer model if the upgrades seem worth it. I wanna see that M2 goodness!!!
What else is new in 2022, just a bunch of winey babies complaining about the price of this new monitor. The "my $300 4K monitor is BETTER" crowd simply don't get it.... You need a 5K panel to properly scale 2560x1400 x4 to get "retina" clarity. Too many people say "eh, I don't care..." but I have bad eyes and NEED the clarity and I can't imagine how somebody wouldn't notice the difference. It's a HUGE difference if you ask me. So the 4K is only an option if you're running at 4K not in HiDPI mode or scaling at 1080. Yes, the LG is cheaper but actually looks like crap side by side, not to mention the ghosting and cheap plastic and wobbly stand. Of course though, the 5K iMac was probably the best bang/buck that Apple ever produced, but for someone like myself who uses Mac Pros (or Mac Studio) this new Studio Display is legitimately the BEST option, PERIOD!
@@Watchandlearn91 this is why is getting so tiring watching all these RUclips videos that basically for the most part seen the same all the time. It comes down to need. We got an XDR in our studio because we could do that because we could pay for it by getting more business. That being said the majority of people will be fine with a 4K monitor. People that need the 5K could do this one and probably be okay with it. Or if you going to Apple referred store right now I’m going to 27 in Shai mac for 1299 which is an insane deal if you don’t mind using intel for the next 2 to 5 years. In The end it all comes down to need. People will chase tack and not improve their skills. Get the best you can and what you can afford or invest in yourself and buy something maybe you don’t think you can afford and go get more business
@@Watchandlearn91 Then that's why there are other monitors for people don't NEED 5K. It's like the 4K crowd would rather this monitor don't exist, which would screw us guys who NEED a good 5K display. It's like a car guy saying trucks don't need to exist.
@@Watchandlearn91 People can use 4K all they want. I have them too and they are frustrating compared to my 5K's. What resolution scaling are you using, or just running natively at 4K without scaling?
@@Watchandlearn91 Doesn't sound like 5K is too necessary to you. I spend about 50-70 hours a week in the studio on mine and feel physical eye pain when running 1440p scaling on a 4K. Apple 5K doesn't strain my eyes. I'd pay more than $1,600 for this new screen if I had to.
I’ll reconsider buying one of these Displays once it’s equipped with ProMotion 120Hz.
Would you please accept a like from me?😂
5k 120hz is not possible
@@SweatySockGaming …yet
@@mistershirokov5067 and when it is possible you will absolutely NOT like the price Apple will be charging.
@@SweatySockGaming yes it is currently possible with DSC which most 4k 144-160 Hz monitors already use.
I checked this out in person- and immediately ordered it. I have a 34inch VESA 600 LG monitor, and it doesn’t hold a candle to the studio display- especially in brightness
I just bought a mini led 1000 nits 144hz for the same price.
@@romanbennifir6020 ...which you'd better keep until it fails because it will have 0 resale value. The Studio Display on the other hand will sell at 75% of the original price even years later, ultimately making it way cheaper
@@romanbennifir6020What model exactly ?
Thanks for putting the Studio Display into a proper perspective when compared to other displays.
I love how He doesn't compare the studio display to anything but an Overpriced XDR and 5 yr old LG. There are much better options out there in 4k. Also the webcam and speakers still definitely don't compare to dedicated devices. Especially the webcam. The stand options where height adjust bumps it up to 1999 and non user removable power cord have no reason. But it gets an edge being 5K, and APPLE design, but its a niche product and I wish Apple had a monitor providing value to the majority.
@@dr.saimamasood8314 Yes. Great points.
Best joke I ever heard: "And you can buy the pro stand for $999.00." Still guffawing about that from the Apple presenter.
Yes, this new display is expensive. Yes, good advice from Max on recommending getting an inexpensive base rather than spend more for Apple's extendable contraption. Years ago, I actually had a display sitting on a very old and thick dictionary.
Or you can buy the pro stand for $999.00. Hahahahahahahaha. Gets me every time.
@@dr.saimamasood8314 why would he compare it with a dim 4K monitor? makes no sense
@@comradeuro4255 living under rocks?
@@PaulStoffregen Yes I did, I didn't say LG was a good option.
I think that’s a good opportunity for some company start building a desk vesa mount that complements the studio display design and allows rotating for portrait mode.
They do, Herman Miller has the Ollin, and it's beautifully designed. And it's less than the $400 stand that Apple is charging for :)
Ergotron HX in white also looks good … BUT in the end, you don't really see it behind the monitor, so I don't really care mine is black
@@abass_ Sorry but the Ollin is hideous generally, particular compared to the XDR high adjustable stand,=.
@@alexanderfoster3628 hideous...? 😅 I think it's beautiful, and it's 10x as functional for 1/4th the price. For each their own 😁
good comparison. One major thing I noticed: the viewing angle changes brightness and color on the new studio monitor. It seemed worse than the older 27 iMac panel I use daily, when I tried it at the apple store. Especially looking a little downward I saw colors and brightness change much more than I am used to. Also the black levels are lacking when comparing to the new laptops or the xdr panels. Made the decision and just ordered an xdr -> better black values, more screen real estate with same size ui, working daily for 6 to 8 hours with design & photo its worth it for me.
Which external displays have xdr? and which one did you get?
Pro display XDR must be the first monitor to match its resolution with its price 1:1 😂
Reference monitors: am I a joke to you?
@@tiziocaio8657 its more expensive
@@geraldsentences7729 every true reference monitor is much much much more expensive than the Apple Pro Display XDR
@@tiziocaio8657What is an example of a reference monitor ? (make and model)
@@majorgear1021EIZO coloredge prominence CG3146.
I love thinner bezels and larger screen. so 6K Pro XDR is a winner !!!
For what Netflix?
ofc it’s better but who has $6K to drop for a monitor
@@comradeuro4255 true bro who spends that much for a monitor
@@manasjamadar8279 idiots do.. and some professionals
@@manasjamadar8279 professionals who work in vfx field
You forgot to mention, that the 32" XDR Display is significantly larger than the 27" Studio Display. That is the main point why I ordered it as I need the space on my Desktop. Thank you for the great reviews!
Why not buy 2 studio displays? Or 10 4k displays for the same price 😂
Bro why would u buy it what a waste of money u could have gotten a m1 ultra Mac studio for that price
@@jordanallen2148
I don't like two displays on my desk. Also it looks cool! 😂
@@TopCars90
I ordered a Mac Studio Ultra too but I cancelled it for a 16" MBP Max.
@@stephank.6411 Agreed it does look cool 😅
I never thought I'd buy the Studio Display so I bought the Ultra Fine LG 5k from Amazon, set it up and was pleased. Then Best Buy had the Studio Display in stock out of nowhere on Friday, so I placed an in-store pickup with the quickness to compare them. First thing I noticed was that when using both monitors at the same time the LG's signal would cut out completely and never turn back on. I had to unplug the thunderbolt to reset the LG. The Studio Display was flawless (as you would guess). After a few hours I realized I would be keeping the Studio Display due to various reasons but the main reason was I needed something that will always be reliable. Just wish it was LED...to solve any height limitations, it currently sits on top of my Mac Studio 🤪
LG is just bad in every product, they work nice at first and then they just stop working
@@evaristocorripio5434 I have been running the LG Ultra Fine screen on my M1-Max MBP 16" with absolutely perfect results.
i believe Apple has confirmed that the Studio Display is not actually a 10-bit display, but rather an 8-bit display with temporal dithering.
Agreed. Wish studio display be bigger size. A lot of competition at 27 and 30in market
Great review. I wanted to add that dimming zones are not ideal for image editing on certain types of images where you have high contrast. The dimming zones can create artifacts (since dimming zones are larger than pixels). When I got my 12.9" M1 iPad Pro with mini LED, I thought it looked great for watching Dolby Vision movies, but I couldn't imagine doing serious photoshop retouching on it. I'm glad Apple went the route they did with the Studio Display (IPS). On another note, you could be correct the monitor's thickness is because it is (or was) destined to be an iMac Pro, but a lot of that thickness is taken up by the internal power supply. The external power supply on the (much thinner) 24" iMac is about the size of an Apple TV. This display would need a larger external power supply than that to allow 96W charging of a connected laptop...
I just added a 5K Studio Display to my collection today, which includes the Pro Display XDR. The panel is bright, the sound is good, and the camera is adequate. Much nicer than my $800 Samsung 4k monitor that I use for my work Windows computer (but then, for twice as much, it had better be!)
If you bought more than one Studio Display to have extra real estate, will audio play from all of them or just the primary one?
You can configure it to your desire.
Another reason for they extra thickness of the frame is due to the internal power supply. You can only make a power supply so thin. Apple did not want a external power brick so they redesigned the power supply.
Please compare the Studio display to the discontinued entry level 27” iMac. Once you do this let’s talk about the price and the declining value from Apple
I made a similar comment bashing Apple and I got a similar reply the this channel. What is this message from maxtech0? Someone else's scam?
@@Swizzenator I received such a message too! I think my comment is at the top right now! He thinks it's some kind of scam. Between the channels a little something about the landscapes can be.
@@Swizzenator no he's just speaking the truth.
How the ... you managed to make the blacks of the XDR to look grey?
Sudio display is a real 10 with a LUT? Adobe RGB colorspace is 90%?
Thanks!
Would it be a good deal to buy a 24 imac m1 instead of a monitor for macbook pro max?
0:08 seconds, is there motion issues on anyone else's display or is it just mine.
The combination of the display quality, brightness, terrific speakers, 10Gbps-capable USB-C ports and solid construction won me over to the Studio Display from a very cheap 28-in 4k display that was affected by interference from any operating webcam. As the existin 4k monitor used a VESA mount, I chose that option with my Studio Display. I generally use a boom-mounted USB condenser mic which my target audience on Zoom prefers over the built-in mic array. To get around the limitations of the webcam I use Continuity Camera with my iPhone 13 Mini and the Belkin iPhone Mount. Another viable option is Iriun Webcam (iOS and Android) with a phone on a tripod. Iriun Webcam also works with iPads.
Have noticed - very subtle albeit - shadowing across the monitor of the studio display, more so toward the edges. Especially noticeable in the highlights of moving images. An easy test is to move the window around quickly if Premiere Pro, or Lightroom. Again, minor issue to most, but concerning as it appeared to be a part of the image at times.
So if I understand correctly if you want the 5 k t be rotatable you have to buy the VESA model and buy your own stand ??? I’m confused
I’m using the Studio display in combo with a 34 inch Ultra Wide from Dell. I don’t regret my purchase AT ALL. The text on the Studio display is AMAZING! I’m a filmmaker regularly shooting 6k. So seeing my work on that glass display at 5K is awesome. The color is stunning and I love having the speakers as an extra source for audio referencing. The monitor is amazing.
Imo the biggest minus is the 60hz refresh rate of the Studio Display... I would have bought it but 60hz is simply underwhelming
For games...maybe. Everything else should be fine. With that said, with the price of the ASD I do agree, it should have had a higher refresh rate.
This is a really good and informative review. It’s balanced and considered unlike many of the other reviews I’ve seen. If you take into account the excellent build quality, the superb display quality, the higher brightness, plus all the extra features, it’s clearly a high quality monitor with an expensive, yes, but still reasonable price tag.
The biggest problem is the Studio Display isn't as good as my MacBook Pro display. I think they hit the wrong sweet spot and bundled some features in there that most studio pros don't care about, all to hit a higher price point. Extra processor with webcam? Nice speakers? Most will already have better speakers in the studio, like reference monitors. I know I do. They should have removed the speakers and processor and hit $1000, or made it $2000 with no speakers/A13 and had a mini LED that matches the spec of the MacBook Pro.
I can't find that awesome wallpaper in you library... Wait they have to be purchased?
wish apple would make an cool looking flat Ultrawide Panel. i love mine and couldnt think of anything else or oled for gaming. love both my b1 and my UW
I just wish the studio display was 32 inch
Hi is there a USB thunderbolt hub so I can run 3 x studios displays with just one cable to my MacBook Pro m1x
The Studio Display is disappointing. The new MacBooks have better displays than the Pro Display XDR despite being a lower price. I think people would've been really excited if Studio Display was $1999 but had MiniLED and 1000/1600 nits.
@productivity and…?
Thanks for review,where did you buy that t shirt?
Wondering if I can live with a 16” MacBook instead of a 27” (currently iMac) just so I can enjoy gorgeous hdr movies
Compare the Asus proart displays with mini led, they have a 32" 120hz version
🔝🔝🔝 Congratulations you've won today's random selection, text me now I have something for you
@productivity You are correct, It's mini led and 120hz which could be a good pair for laptops with high refresh rate mini led displays such as In the 14 and 16 pro
Hi Max, do you think Apple will release an update Pro XDR display in June? I'm really looking forward to that!
I heard it was gonna be 7k.
2:17 most monitors these days come with matte coating pre installed so i think you meant lower contrast + less reflectivity. Glossy = more reflectivity and better contrast. Look up Dave2D's eve spectrum monitor video if you want to see the comparison. Yes that means apple charges extra couple hundred bucks to add matte coating while the entire monitor industry does it out of the box. Meanwhile, PC gamers would love more glossy monitor options but some reason, they decided to completely get rid of it but hopefully it'll come back. There are a few glossy office monitors though but not many.
It's not a matte coating. What Apple offers is different and also many matte coatings makes image quality suck.
What Apple does is not a coating, and not as coarse as a traditional matte treatment. They etch the glass surface itself, to break up reflections without introducing the image quality compromises of matte plastic or an additional layer of coating. That special process is why it costs so much. But the cost of adding it is more than I would pay.
@@onbquo you should check side by side of the apple displays. Their "nano-texture" makes the image quality look worse than the cheaper glossy model. it does downgrade the image quality
@@brightboxstudio Even if apple has their own method of creating these anti reflective displays, the end result is the same which is less reflective + worse image quality. I will always go for the glossy over their anti-reflective since it's much cheaper and has better image quality
@@loldatfunny There are major differences between a matte screen, a glossy screen, a glossy screen with nano-texture etching, and a glossy screen with anti-glare coatings. They cannot all be lumped together, because the end result is not always the same. Matte loses the most contrast, glossy has the most glare. Glossy with etching is effective, but too expensive. Glossy with the proper coatings is a good compromise between contrast and glare, and the coatings are NOT all equal. I have held up different phones against glossy laptop screens with different coatings, and some are much better than others.
Why not add touchscreen to it, now that its powered by the A13??🤔🤔🤔
Studio Display is awesome, pricey but having 5K resolution with true 2K retina it is: FINAAALLLY! And no who ask for 32" or says 4K is the same, simply don't understand how retina works.
COMPARE THE NEW SAMSUNG GALAXY BOOK 2 PRO 360 WITH MACBOOK AIR 2021
I think the reason no other manufacturer offers displays with high-quality aluminum enclosures and other premium design features, is that Apple somehow was able to stop them from doing it. They probably told LG how they wanted the UltraFine 5k monitor to be so it wouldn't compete with future Apple monitors that were in the pipeline.
what about samsung? apple can't stop them , still they are creating ugly plasticky gamery 4k monitors , the market doesn't care about quality product just only small percentage of mac users so there is no need for the other companies to create high end 5k displays
i doubt that. few companies have invested in metal tech the way apple has. it's a signature material that they have been perfecting and iterating on for years.
Great review. Can you also add the speakers' URL to the description?
Thanks For your awesome quality content and insane dedication,I love your videos,Keep up the amazing work🔥🙂!.
I’ve been breaking my head, no one is mentioning the wattage output of the usb-c ports? What is the power? If I would like to charge my iPad pro simultaneously? Thank you in advance for the first repliers!
I myself don’t have the equipment to test the Studio Display’s port wattage, but I can make a logical deduction. Bear with me here.
We know that Apple says, with the Studio Display, “you can even fast charge a 14 inch MacBook Pro”. Now, from various sources, I’ve found that the 14 inch MacBook Pro draws 73 W in order to fast charge. That means the Studio Display can deliver at least 73 W of power. However, Apple doesn’t say that it’s capable of fast charging a 16 inch MacBook Pro, and those draw more power (and come with a 140 W adapter instead of a 96 W). So we can assume it can’t deliver much more power than that.
Haven't even watched the entire video, but this is the video I needed to watch today! Great work Max + Team!!
Thanks Mark!
I'm holding out for a new 6k 32" solution. In the meantime I'll just use the Studio mac with my old 27" 5k iMac -- I just need to figure out the best way to hook the iMac for display-only purposes.
i thought they took that function away after apple realized they were losing money on the display market? Let me know if you find a way, im very interested in this
@@purplekrakenyut Yes, Apple removed the option when the 5k iMacs were released. I believe you can "screen share" though that would require using the iMac as a computer as opposed to a dedicated display. There's also Luna Display, but not sure how well that works.
@@purplekrakenyut That's pure BS. Do you have insider knowledge that this is the reason? I mean, how were they "losing money on the display market" when they make no retina displays (until this month)? If people were buying entire computers to use them as displays, Apple would probably think that's fantastic! Especially since again, Apple had no displays on the display market to lose money to.
@@garfieldirwin The reason target display mode was killed was because at the time (2014) there were no cables with enough bandwidth to drive a 5K display.
@@77dris I honestly don't know, but there's little doubt Apple could have rectified the situation with a little engineering work. Guess it just wasn't a priority for them.
So iPhone 11 and this display use the same chip, how does that explain the difference in thickness? I mean what kind of explanation is this.
🔝🔝🔝 Congratulations you've won for today, text me now I have something for you.
Hi there, I've been looking forever for the original file that Apple supplies in "/System/Library/Desktop Pictures". I keep finding converted PNG or JPEG images that are high resolution, but not the original HEIC file. If anyone with a Pro Display XDR wants to bless us with the OG file right out of the library folder (maybe zipped so it doesn't convert on Reddit), that would be amazing!
Where can I find the little monitor shelf that you sed to raise the monitor? Thanks!
gotta admit that they look DAMN good. can gaming monitors out there get any uglier? can everyone adapt to, if not Apple's, at least dell's minimal design? not every gamers want space ships on their desk
To be honest, most people dont care how nice a monitor looks on your desk. They are using a monitor for the screen 99% of the time. I do agree though, a lot of monitors are ugly RGB vomit.
How did you connect the speakers te the XDR.
What is the background that the Studio Display in the video sees? It looks so good and I would like to use it!
You can find it here! bit.ly/2WNc6Qw
@@MaxTechOfficial thank you!
Does anyone know what software he uses to check how hard the cpu and gpu is running
How to connect Apple TV to Apple Studio Display?? :)
What speakers did you get
MaxTech please upload in 30fps or 60fps
uploading video in 24fps is sooo low, video stutters
Still waiting for the updated Pro version
it would be great if apple made a studio display that was 32 inch. maybe next iteration. having tried a number for 4k options i finally saw the light and got the studio display. total game changer.
You still didn’t mention response time and refresh rate , it looks like you’re not allowed to talk about it, but now I got it I will go with LG ultra-wide, it is less built quality and PPI than apple’s but way better form factor, response time and refresh rate
lmao 6:29 😆😂🙌
Trying to decide on one, two, or three studio displays. Anyone tried this? What do you think?
🔝🔝🔝 Congratulations you've won today's random selection, text me now I have something for you
Fantastic review guys. I’m on the fence and this is tipping me to the 5K
Awesome comparison Max!! I wish Apple would elaborate more on the specs of the ASD. Been looking for monitors to go with my Late 2021 16" MacBook Pro M1 Max for over to weeks..... no luck. Everything I've looked at has a mixed bag of spec's for my needs for FCPX. The ASD is looking more & more desirable everyday. Only thing is if a jump on it, Apple will come out with something nicer in the spring.... As always, Thank You for all your hard work!! 👍😊
Thanks! Just the kind of comparison I was looking for.
Please tell me where you got that wallpaper @4:55 , it’s so hard to find..
What's the distance between the screen and the desk when fully vertical with the regular stand?
🔝🔝 Congratulations you've won for today, text me now I have something for you.
I saw something about someone suspecting that Apple may make an external GPU. If so, I would expect that to be put inside this monitor. It would basically allow future iPhones or iPads to be your laptop and the “dock” to hook you into heavy duty power as needed.
Those future iPhone needs to ditch lightning connector if they gotta be used for a dock.
You’re thinking too much
Tada!@@AndersHass
@@dskidz99 now they just need to use a standard that can handle PCIe tunneling lol
My question which nobody has been able to answer yet. The studio display has 3 x USB-C at 10Gb/s, fine. My question
Is; can you use one of these ports as a 10Gbe Ethernet and if yes, what adapter is to be used?!
I'm really not a fan of Apple's trend toward making speakers that are more bass heavy and quieter. I will take natural clarity and overall power over boomy bass any day (bass seems like a crutch to cover up bad sound). My 27" iMac had nearly perfect sound for a built in setup.
Has anybody compared the loudness to a 27" iMac? Like if an iMac was 10/10, how loud is the Studio display?
Btw, that webcam is terrible for a monitor of this price with a built in a13 CPU in it! Apparently Apple says they are aware and are working on a firmware fix. Should be interesting. Also should be doable UNLESS they put a really crappy sensor/lens in it, in which case no amount of software tweaking will fix it.
🔝🔝🔝 Congratulations you've won today's random selection, text me now I have something for you
I have been saving my money to buy a 5K 27" Studio display to replace my 2K 27" Cinema display on my M1 Mac Mini. I should be able to spend the $2,000, with the better stand, in about six to ten months. That would make my purchase around February 2024. I can't afford $6,000 for a monitor.
I'm just disappointed about the contrast ratio of this display. I wish further development could go into the neglected 5K panel, as 1040:1 is just really lame by today's standards. As I write this, I'm using an Apple display made over a decade ago -- and it has a contrast ratio of 700:1.
Nice job gentleman, I am very pleased to have picked up a previously owned Thunderbolt Display for $300 in excellent condition to use with my 2019 MacBook Pro and my 2017 iMac . My anticipation for the newest iMac is palpable 🥳🥰🙋🏽♀️!
Anyone who would enjoy a cheap dell monitor will not appreciate this display. Anyone who would appreciate apples design and build quality won’t care about the price. It’s a hit for sure.
Great job man, you made my mind up.
Y’all said you wouldn’t use that song anymore 🤨
Great review
I guess you can spend 400.00 for an adjustable height stand, 90.00 for a riser, or .25 for a book at a garage sale.
4:11 What I would love to know is do any of those USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 ports on the back share any bandwidth? I think they'd have to.
Wow! I thought that the more expensive stand was able to rotate the monitor. Bummer!
Strange that it doesn't have a power button. You have to unplug it to turn off the display.
A lot of people hate on the studiodisplay but it is actually a really good value!
please keep making mac studio content, your's is way more in depth and unbiased than other youtubers
The dealbreaker for me is that it is a 27" screen.
As I´m used to a 32" (a Philips) the step down is a bit to far.
The only reason that won't get me to buy an apple monitor is the refresh rate. I want promotion so that's why I use a 144hz 1080p gaming monitor with my MacBook pro.
Yes it can, but not in size. Heck, even a Samsung CRG9 46" gives you more READABLE room especially when using BetterDummy !
I don't want to sit that close to teh screen !
Didn’t know about the data speed limitations of the XDR. That was really useful!
I really liked the larger size of the XDR, but with data speed and built-in speakers, the studio display seems like a much better monitor for almost everyone since we aren’t looking at HDR content most of the time we are using the computer. It’s not like the web or any software/app interfaces use it.
I like the accurate colors and image quality and the sharpness, but realistically, I could also just be fine with 4k 32” probably and less accurate colors and less color depth.
Great advice.
the fact that you cannot daisy chain either display or use a thunderbolt hub for the 6000 pro display (nor does it have a webcam, mic or speakers) is beyond ridiculous. anyone who buys either display has way more money than brains. both displays offer horrendous value
I was excited at first, but the more I thought of, the more it got clear to me, that this display is not worh it. Especially for those who don't care about using only Apple products.
🔝🔝🔝 Congratulations you've won today's random selection, text me now I have something for you
Me still waiting for them to update it
Since it's been 2 years, I wonder if Apple will treat the 6K Pro Display XDR like this new 5K display but instead of putting an iPhone's internals inside of it they put an iPad Pro's internals inside instead. I'm REALLY needing a new iPad but I just have this feeling like they're going to update the iPad Pro this year and it might make more sense to wait for the update and then pick up a cheaper last gen iPad Pro or cough up the dough for the newer model if the upgrades seem worth it. I wanna see that M2 goodness!!!
I've been enjoying XDR for over a year and now with Mac Studio it's the perfect combo.
Not gonna talk about refresh rate? Thats a bad miss
🔝🔝🔝 Congratulations you've won today's random selection, text me now I have something for you
For these prices, both of them should be touch screen and apple pencil compatible
Thanks, I am buying XDR
good video,thxxxxx
I wish the studio display had pro motion.
Almost 2 years later, Apple still hasn't updated the Pro Display XDR.
When they update the pro display with 120hz and all the features like webcams I’ll consider it. 60hz isn’t an option for me
2 years at a minimum before they release a 5k 120hz monitor.
What else is new in 2022, just a bunch of winey babies complaining about the price of this new monitor. The "my $300 4K monitor is BETTER" crowd simply don't get it.... You need a 5K panel to properly scale 2560x1400 x4 to get "retina" clarity. Too many people say "eh, I don't care..." but I have bad eyes and NEED the clarity and I can't imagine how somebody wouldn't notice the difference. It's a HUGE difference if you ask me. So the 4K is only an option if you're running at 4K not in HiDPI mode or scaling at 1080. Yes, the LG is cheaper but actually looks like crap side by side, not to mention the ghosting and cheap plastic and wobbly stand. Of course though, the 5K iMac was probably the best bang/buck that Apple ever produced, but for someone like myself who uses Mac Pros (or Mac Studio) this new Studio Display is legitimately the BEST option, PERIOD!
Saying it's the best options it's really not saying much. Considering you need 5k you only don't have many choices
@@Watchandlearn91 this is why is getting so tiring watching all these RUclips videos that basically for the most part seen the same all the time. It comes down to need. We got an XDR in our studio because we could do that because we could pay for it by getting more business. That being said the majority of people will be fine with a 4K monitor. People that need the 5K could do this one and probably be okay with it. Or if you going to Apple referred store right now I’m going to 27 in Shai mac for 1299 which is an insane deal if you don’t mind using intel for the next 2 to 5 years. In The end it all comes down to need. People will chase tack and not improve their skills. Get the best you can and what you can afford or invest in yourself and buy something maybe you don’t think you can afford and go get more business
@@Watchandlearn91 Then that's why there are other monitors for people don't NEED 5K. It's like the 4K crowd would rather this monitor don't exist, which would screw us guys who NEED a good 5K display. It's like a car guy saying trucks don't need to exist.
@@Watchandlearn91 People can use 4K all they want. I have them too and they are frustrating compared to my 5K's. What resolution scaling are you using, or just running natively at 4K without scaling?
@@Watchandlearn91 Doesn't sound like 5K is too necessary to you. I spend about 50-70 hours a week in the studio on mine and feel physical eye pain when running 1440p scaling on a 4K. Apple 5K doesn't strain my eyes. I'd pay more than $1,600 for this new screen if I had to.
Almost 1M subs, Max!
There’s two of you! Never realised!