I once did a similar jump in a 110 Land Rover, except the ramp was about two feet high and we ended up at the same height of the lorry cab passing the other side of the central reservation of the motorway. We did it on the closed side of the motorway. The take off was fine, as was the flight, but the landing was scary as hell! We came down on the drivers side front wheel first and then while the other three regained contact with terrafirma I had to rapidly swerve around a pallet of pipes and then a port-a-cabin.Taking off hadn't been part of the plan.Maybe we should have given more thought into what would happen when we hit the Bailey bridge at 60mph :)
this guy in the red shirt already has an air bag deployed, and i dont think there is enough air in the cabin for the air bag to inflate... huckin' oliphant!
they should have done one last test to definitely set the airbags off like send that car down a test strip into a wall with dummies to try to prove they would go off if necessary. this kind of just looks like the airbags wont deploy at all. i should just watch Shoenice instead. i saw him eat a stick of deoderant and eat glue but who hasnt eaten a little glue right?
The airbag on the passenger side employs patented "Compounded Binary Computational" chip technology resulting in a degree of safety consciousness permitting the enactment of novel self-preservation mode developed by the Vehicle Dept. of MIT., Cambridge, Mass.,. Employing physiologic; mass displacement and data bank referral modalities, the test unit assesses the potential absorptive vectors required to maintain the passenger within the minimum safety capsule compliance formula as mandated by the restraint systems engineers in collaboration with the Research Dept. of The MIT Resource Safety Data Management Program. Observation of the passenger side airbags activity at the maximum point of threshold systems restraint mechanisms' immutable "secure-engage-deploy" linear progression intelligence response to manage and compute moment-by-moment risk assessment options engagement, indicates the P side air restraint system embarking on an undetermined degree of mechanical self-awareness and subsequent acknowledgement of self-possessive/self-survival modality for the purpose of rejection of the priority recognized scenario of mistaken identification for a XXXXL massed Hydrogenated glucose consumable component (extreme mass marshmallow) with subsequent immediate consumption by the uber-sized professional vehicle crash test human unit. Thus, the P. side airbag did not engage.
Do they even look up how an airbag works before posting this? It detects rapid deceleration, not bumper contacts. The life threatening part of an accident is the deceleration. This is more of a car body strength test.
That's the point, the car undergoes a series of impacts that shouldn't set the airbag off, so if it does go off the manufacturer knows they need to have a redesign.
+Tom Jackson The system works from deceleration, not impace. In other words it is like testing to see if pressing the gas pedal when the engine is off will make the car go. It just isn't designed for that.
+Peter Gilbert That's was I said! I said that these tests are designed so that the airbags SHOULDN'T deploy, if they do deploy, then the airbag sensors, circuits and detonators need to be redesigned.
+Tom Jackson Their next test should be regularly knocking on the window and seeing if that opens the trunk then. Makes as much sence as this test does.
+Peter Gilbert Not really, the sensors and explosive charges in airbags can be quite sensitive. If the G sensor is faulty, or the explosive charge too unstable, they need to find out before the design is sold to the public. Having stripped an MX5 which had rollover sensors, X, Y and Z Green sensors and explosive charges for the seatbelts and airbags, you realise how many failure points are in such a complicated system.
It works from harsh deceleration, not impact. What it is is a weighted ball in a cylinder and when the heavy ball hits the button on the end it sends an electronic signal. All this is doing is scratching the paint for no reason.
Actually, if you do know about cars you would know that your car has a impact sensor in the front, back, and the side of the car. If it has enough force to trigger the signal, then the explosive charge will be set off to deploy an airbag. Without this sensor the airbag would be set off every time you brake very hard under emergency circumstances. So you are saying that if a stock car have slick tires and racing brakes, it would deploy the airbag when harshly braking? Even before the crash??
So much wrong with this - I can't believe that this is the standard test. First, why do it with actual people? It's not like they can't drive the car remotely like they do for crash tests. Second, it would seem that one essential set of tests would be to hit a series of increasing masses to check that deployment does not happen right below the acceleration threshold but does happen right above it. Nothing shown here came close to the deployment threshold (usually around 20G I think). Third, I don't understand the gravel test (gravel hitting the underbody of the car). It seems like it should have no effect if the accelerometer in the airbag control unit is solidly mounted to the unibody. In other words, it seems like if that is worth testing, then we are so far down "in the weeds" of what things to test that you might as well test a whole bunch of other odd scenarios (like driving through water).
I don't think you had realized that you've watched a commented version of a 30 year old video from a series of tests which were realized and recorded for a German entertainment show for non-car people when you watched this 6 years ago. But also: Gravel test is important and all car manufacturers do test alot of gravel stuff. When I worked at Hyundai in 2013 they put all their disguised prototypes through multiple hundreds of sets of 5 minute gravel tests. Opel did less gravel tests, but a decent amount still.
Plot Twist: The car was never equipped with air bags.
+William Romano it was not
Jumbo wishes he could arrive at a McDonald's drive through like that lol
I once did a similar jump in a 110 Land Rover, except the ramp was about two feet high and we ended up at the same height of the lorry cab passing the other side of the central reservation of the motorway. We did it on the closed side of the motorway. The take off was fine, as was the flight, but the landing was scary as hell! We came down on the drivers side front wheel first and then while the other three regained contact with terrafirma I had to rapidly swerve around a pallet of pipes and then a port-a-cabin.Taking off hadn't been part of the plan.Maybe we should have given more thought into what would happen when we hit the Bailey bridge at 60mph :)
Desenho fotos de tela do telefone
There is airbag in the red shirt already. :P
No that's a meat bag
No, is a shit bag.
that orange shirt guy obviously hide the airbag under his shirt
There's a camera on the airbag door. If it is activated then "jumbo" is gonna eat that camera. It's not like he wouldn't want to.
+Zandah Starick That comment makes me laugh a lot xD :')
test is that with inert airbag ecu, obviously. It just records
this guy in the red shirt already has an air bag deployed, and i dont think there is enough air in the cabin for the air bag to inflate... huckin' oliphant!
"registered the 'pay-tent'...LOL!
At least Digital Voices are getting better,... Otherwise an interesting short Documentary, thanks.
Jumbo: *sits in car*
*airbag deploys*
Zaten yolcu kısmındaki adam yastık gibi birşey olmaz adama torpidodan geri döner 😃😃😃
ooo türk
they should have done one last test to definitely set the airbags off like send that car down a test strip into a wall with dummies to try to prove they would go off if necessary. this kind of just looks like the airbags wont deploy at all. i should just watch Shoenice instead. i saw him eat a stick of deoderant and eat glue but who hasnt eaten a little glue right?
"Jumbo wishes he could arrive at a McDonalds drive thru like that" ROFL!
в его случае ремень просто опасен, таких надо 4-6 точечными привязывать
Yo how much kg was he i thought he was gonna seatbelt and fly out the wind one
Dose this car have ABS?
How often do false airbag deployments happen?
What's the deal with Jumbo? Does adding a seriously fat guy to most situations make it more interesting?
The airbag on the passenger side employs patented "Compounded Binary Computational" chip technology resulting in a degree of safety consciousness permitting the enactment of novel self-preservation mode developed by the Vehicle Dept. of MIT., Cambridge, Mass.,. Employing physiologic; mass displacement and data bank referral modalities, the test unit assesses the potential absorptive vectors required to maintain the passenger within the minimum safety capsule compliance formula as mandated by the restraint systems engineers in collaboration with the Research Dept. of The MIT Resource Safety Data Management Program.
Observation of the passenger side airbags activity at the maximum point of threshold systems restraint mechanisms' immutable "secure-engage-deploy" linear progression intelligence response to manage and compute moment-by-moment risk assessment options engagement, indicates the P side air restraint system embarking on an undetermined degree of mechanical self-awareness and subsequent acknowledgement of self-possessive/self-survival modality for the purpose of rejection of the priority recognized scenario of mistaken identification for a XXXXL massed Hydrogenated glucose consumable component (extreme mass marshmallow) with subsequent immediate consumption by the uber-sized professional vehicle crash test human unit. Thus, the P. side airbag did not engage.
BUT THAT GUY SEATED IN THE PASSENGER SEAT HAS HIS OWN NATURAL AIR BAG.
No airbags where tested in the making of this video.
Voll geil dass da Jumbo ist xD
Das ist doch Jumbo von Galileo
I replayed 2:10... In slow Mo XD
Lol this show is British but the drivers are driving a world car.
Do they even look up how an airbag works before posting this? It detects rapid deceleration, not bumper contacts. The life threatening part of an accident is the deceleration. This is more of a car body strength test.
That's the point, the car undergoes a series of impacts that shouldn't set the airbag off, so if it does go off the manufacturer knows they need to have a redesign.
+Tom Jackson The system works from deceleration, not impace. In other words it is like testing to see if pressing the gas pedal when the engine is off will make the car go. It just isn't designed for that.
+Peter Gilbert That's was I said! I said that these tests are designed so that the airbags SHOULDN'T deploy, if they do deploy, then the airbag sensors, circuits and detonators need to be redesigned.
+Tom Jackson Their next test should be regularly knocking on the window and seeing if that opens the trunk then. Makes as much sence as this test does.
+Peter Gilbert Not really, the sensors and explosive charges in airbags can be quite sensitive. If the G sensor is faulty, or the explosive charge too unstable, they need to find out before the design is sold to the public. Having stripped an MX5 which had rollover sensors, X, Y and Z Green sensors and explosive charges for the seatbelts and airbags, you realise how many failure points are in such a complicated system.
They are testing airbag, with camera attached to the airbag, how stupid is that? Or there are no airbags in this car?
theres already a red coloured airbag in co-driver seat
comes to see airbags .. Just find the red one.
sweet demo of the kind of collision it really takes to puff up the airbag. It's only really needed in high speed head-on crash
It works from harsh deceleration, not impact. What it is is a weighted ball in a cylinder and when the heavy ball hits the button on the end it sends an electronic signal. All this is doing is scratching the paint for no reason.
Actually, if you do know about cars you would know that your car has a impact sensor in the front, back, and the side of the car. If it has enough force to trigger the signal, then the explosive charge will be set off to deploy an airbag. Without this sensor the airbag would be set off every time you brake very hard under emergency circumstances. So you are saying that if a stock car have slick tires and racing brakes, it would deploy the airbag when harshly braking? Even before the crash??
52.8166 mph and the front end doesn't look a bit wrecked.
what car are the driving
thats an opel corsa (german space shuttle)
That's a Opel Astra 1.8
so cool
Good
1:06 song pleasee
So much wrong with this - I can't believe that this is the standard test. First, why do it with actual people? It's not like they can't drive the car remotely like they do for crash tests. Second, it would seem that one essential set of tests would be to hit a series of increasing masses to check that deployment does not happen right below the acceleration threshold but does happen right above it. Nothing shown here came close to the deployment threshold (usually around 20G I think). Third, I don't understand the gravel test (gravel hitting the underbody of the car). It seems like it should have no effect if the accelerometer in the airbag control unit is solidly mounted to the unibody. In other words, it seems like if that is worth testing, then we are so far down "in the weeds" of what things to test that you might as well test a whole bunch of other odd scenarios (like driving through water).
I don't think you had realized that you've watched a commented version of a 30 year old video from a series of tests which were realized and recorded for a German entertainment show for non-car people when you watched this 6 years ago. But also: Gravel test is important and all car manufacturers do test alot of gravel stuff. When I worked at Hyundai in 2013 they put all their disguised prototypes through multiple hundreds of sets of 5 minute gravel tests. Opel did less gravel tests, but a decent amount still.
Car may koi heldmate pehenta kya
Why would they post it if they new
That is was not going to come out.
why is this video narrated like a children's audiobook
jumbo already has his own airbag ;p
Airbag ok, but no ABS? WTF?
Cool
Jumbo can drive into a McDonald's drive thru with a Opel Astra? True.
opel astra?
Corsa
Jumbo is testing foot on german TV
He was named Jumbo after the airbag in his jumbo stomach
if they hit jumbo with that airbag removed car at 85 mph then surely the airbag would materialize
is this official
An airbag would be something that would be considered a universal good. Was there any reason why the Americans didn't share their knowledge?
Does he need any airbab more?
Why is he called jumbo ?
The air bag will saved his belly in the crash...
nice car
name on the helmet
Adam zaten airbag
Maybe the airbag is not working at all! They should have crashed the car at the end to proof it is actually working properly.
"The airbag doesn't materialize" uhmmm...
Türk Yokmu ? :;)
var 😀
var 😀
var 😀
var
lahmacunda ister midin😀😆
ADAMLAR ZATEN HAVA YASTIĞI GİBİ
🇹🇷AOG🇹🇷
was is mit dem ABS los ?
so col
Wrong name it must be SLAPPING BAGS
Window
La ballena willi con playera roja
the airbag would pop if jumbo hit it
I think your airbag is already damaged!
i think the is no airbag on the car at all !!!
perodua myvi
His stomach is look like air bag
hi
There no airbags in these cars on the sun visors there needs to be a warning label on it
ChrisBennett18 That's not true, labels aren't necessary. And every Corsa (even previous generation) has airbags.
Incorrect. Only Corsa's after 1998 had airbags.
Corsa.
Hey jumbo geh abnehmen ;) spaß, (
Wieso lässt man das nicht einfach auf deutsch 😂😂😂😂
Why does the narrator sound like Herbert the pervert
2nd airbag fail looks like the recalls issued as of late on fake airbags.
Yt be there
,
Looks like 2 cheesburgers flappin around
LOL
JUMBO webmemes.org(moar)
Air bag in my car
Assam Entertainer D AY
Japanese technology is best in the world.
scheiß englische Übersetzung
😂😂😂😂😂😂LoL
boring