Russia's Gazprom losses nearly Double Year on Year Russian gas giant Gazprom suffered net losses from January to June 2024 almost double those in the same period last year, the Ukrainian media outlet enkorr reported on July 31. Losses in the first half of 2024 totalled 480.64 billion rubles ($5.5 billion), while those in the first half of 2023 totalled 255 billion rubles ($2.95 billion), according to Gazprom financial statements seen by the outlet. Gazprom has had a turbulent time since the launch of Russia's full-scale invasion - its revenue fell by 30% last year with a net loss of $6.9 billion, the largest in 25 years. Moscow's war in Ukraine led to worsening relations with Europe, limiting the operations of the company. "Gazprom is at a dead end, and they're very much aware of it," Ribakova said after reading the report. Gazprom announced Production has Fallen to USSR...1970s Levels "Everything According to Plan " 😀😀
While it's true that the Ukrainian pilots need substantial training time to become competent on the F-16, their military as a whole has proven to be highly adept and adaptive under pressure. So if anything, the arrival of the F16s has been underhyped. The Ukrainian military has in the past surprised and even caught analysts off guard. If it wasn't all that, then the Ukrainians wouldn't have bothered.
Ukrainian men and women are fighting to keep their freedoms, Putin's lemmings are fighting for money, or simply because they are not strong enough to say no.
Not really discussed publicly, but there are actually a fair number of veteran western military F-16 pilots both of Ukrainian ancestry and “foreign volunteers” already available to the Ukrainian Air Force to pilot donated F-16s and to both train and cadre Ukrainian F-16 squadrons. The same is true of ground and maintenance personnel. Some of those pilots even have combat experience.
No country can eat up losing a thousand men a day for long, I just dread to think at how many Ukraine is losing as well. I'm beginning to see what military commanders in Vietnam meant when they were saying how their government wasn't allowing them to win that war. It seems America had the same mindset when it comes to not allowing Ukraine to strike prime, big, juicy targets in Russia. They are costing their allies thousands of lives with such rules. Maybe tens of thousands of lives. They must revise these backward rules.
pro ukraine people still don't understand that ukraine deep striking Russia with nato missiles and nato intelligence and with nato specialists handling the weapons is like nato deeps striking into Russia and Russia would respond directly against nato this is why they aren't allowing it.
Excellent contribution by Col Phillip Imgram , well explained easy to understand , this guy knows his stuff & recognises the Ukraines are doing a tremendous job at reducing the , Russian offensive attacks with a lot less men , stopping the Russian offensive several times a day . Looking at Russian tank losses , I feel they will run out of Tanks by late fall & their artillery pieces are in a similar shape , daily being destroyed , barrels wearing out & problems with Ammo stocks under constant Interdiction by Ukraine . With a reduced working population causeling production to fall in all sectors & their services infestructure also suffering very badly , will cause Russia to go on the back foot as winter starts adding to their problems of fresh troops with very little training adapting to winter conditions . The Russians will start to find supply problems of armoured vehicles, ammo stocks constantly being interdicted & men shortages as winter sets in on half trained troops . Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 , 🇬🇧
They need two things to take the pressure off of the Ukrainians on the front line. 1) stop restrictions on use of western weapons in Russia. 2) more fighter jets.
Western countries could actively man the northern border with Belarus etc. That would free a lot of Ukrainian manpower without being overtly aggressive.
To fly and return from missions is best abetted by having large attack groups. A half dozen F-16s is great for air defense. Need about 120 - 250 F-16s to have an effective attacking force.
@@dudeonyoutube They're not. The airframes are from the 1980s onwards but the technology in the planes is modern. Just like my computer is from the 2020s but the cabinet is from the early 1990s; that doesn't make the computer ancient, it's modern no matter the age of the box outside. The F-16 is still produced and modern produced or modern upgraded F-16s are nothing like the first F-16s of the 1970s. It's a completely different plane except the airframe.
A strategy that slowly bulldozes everything at great human cost does not need highly trained anyone. It’s how Russia beat Germany in 1945. It’s how they fought every war ever since.
@@roelkomduur8073 And they still lost the war despite the fact USSR only lost 20 thousand man during 10 years of war. Now they have lost more than 580 thousand man in 2,5 years and the sanctions are much worse.
@@Glenn-hm8sb I think the Russian economy are harder than west point out. The GNP is going up only because of the war economy. The rest of the industry are left in a stand by and you cant just leave that in a stand by and then continue as nothing has happened. That economy are not coming back. No money are coming in The biggest and most profitable company in Russia as Gazprom that made many billions in income and now today instead going heavy minus first time in history. 10 of thosands of Russian people will loose their job. And by that all the secondary business will also go down. Russia are now reaching Its peak when it comes to war industry. Russia need another 500 thousand men to the war industry and next year the lack will be about 1 million. Then you can try to imagine how it is in the civilian industry. A lot of people that are needed in the civilian jobs are already working in war industry or are pushed to war and Its just getting worse. We can already see the result of that. A lot of catatstophe are happening around Russia citys after citys are flooded. The infrastructure that you need entertaine are not done. The water supply, Electric supply and many other things are just in a edge of a catatstophe.
Most supporting nations has already given Ukraine the latest and greatest, yet they keeping losing them due to their lack of competency so they had to store them 😂
And not just because it's killing Russians: it's also clearing off our older stock shelves and giving us the room to restock with new equipment, munitions, and tech.
@@jackson22668 if by competency, you mean training... i agree... if, on the other hand you mean a lack of skill/intelligence/bravery, i am fairly certain you are incorrect... one of the largest problems from what i can tell are the facts that they are getting the requirement AFTER they have needed it for a year or more and receiving the equipment in small amounts over a long time. SLAVA UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇲
@@jackson22668 Not true. They have received " some " support, often long delayed, including modern weaponry, and some of the more capable kit comes with restrictions on how it can be used. I.e. Cannot be used to attack targets on Russian territory. There is a political reluctance to enable Ukraine with the latest and greatest and a free hand in the use of such assets. Example. Russia intercepted high level government communications in Germany which revealed an intention to supply Taurus missiles to Ukraine. The response from Russia was to inform Germany that if that were to happen they would consider Germany had formally entered the war as a combatant and would be treated as such. So, the politics comes into play along with other realities such as Germany's military being weak from decades of relying upon it's alliance as a NATO member to take their eye off the ball and not being in a position of strength to counter such threats. Training in the use of other assets like the F-16s takes time, and having the required mass to turn the tide isn't in place. I think we can expect to see some shift in balance as these assets become employed. It will be small but significant, giving some relief and expanded opportunities to the canny Ukraine armed forces. Nothing is guaranteed, they need a lot more.
I have really enjoyed this series of interviews. Hats off to the interviewer, who asks sharp, pertinent questions, and he is a very good listener. Well done all and thanks.
Just a question for Russians. What do you think happens when we over here in western countries actually start fighting? How do you think things would go in St. Petersburg with the Finnish armed forces alone? I don’t wish to negate the great efforts that Ukrainians have been making for their territories for an age, but I ask Russians to wake up. You had plenty of chance to make positive impact on Ukraine as an ally, but the majority have seen joining Europe and west as better for their future. Flattening their eastern cities only has hardened that resolve.
Question to all pro-Russia posters. How can ANY force on Earth possibly hope to occupy territory when they are opposed by a conglomeration of the wealthiest and most powerful nations in human history who have unlimited resources and time at their disposal, who can target and strike you around the clock with impunity?
Russia doesn't want to occupy all of Ukraine. They just want a neutral Ukraine. As for your "most powerful nations in human history", their day has passed, their resources are far, far less than Russia and China and their time is running out. You need to wake up to the new reality.
No one have to be pro-russian to answer that. There are tools for pacifying civilians, there are tools to pacify Ukrainians. Russia could any time delete Ukrainian electrical grid/ plants fully, not just in 50%. Ukraine is already bankrupted. Civilians want peace more and more.
Napoleon did it a brunch of time Sure if this war ends up stretching for a other decade Russia might not be able to keep up, right now they are producing more than all nato countries combined If peace is reached soon as I hope for there might be a war 2.0 in the future that might end Russia influence But for now Ukraine’s lower manpower and lack of shells and air defense is putting Russia in a strong position to dictate the future outcome The better question is why didn’t Ukraine wait to join nato? That’s the main reason for the war imo War is terrible and needs to be avoided at all cost Putin f’ed up But the west also f’ed up The need to come to the negotiating table wayyyyy before the war started but they just didn’t want to play ball All the best to you 😊
Through cyber attacks and spreading disinformation on social media thereby causing chaos in those societies and diverting resources and attention to the real problem.
What a great explanation of how Ukraine has so cleverly played their cards as the man in the middle. Right; they’ve trained with both the Russians and the West. They know how stagnant and unwieldy Russian command & control often is and how flexible and surprisingly devastating the west’s operational control can be when.
As an American. It's really frustrating, and disappointing that America hasn't taken the lead, on suppling fighter aircraft to Ukraine. America has moth balled fighters sitting in Arizona, that wouldn't take much to refurbish and send to Ukraine . Granted they're aircraft with a lot of hours on them. But if asked, I'm sure Ukraine would jump at the chance to get their hands on them. These are aircraft that the US is never going to use again. And there's a number of different models, F-14's, F-15's, F-16's, F-18's, A-10's etc. these are all aircraft that Ukraine could put to good use. Now getting our worthless politicians to grow a pair, and make this happen is probably the hardest part.
The difficulty of flying Lockheed planes for ex-Soviet trained pilots has been well-known for over 20 years. The surprise expressed by commentators that the F16s are not going to make a miraculous difference in the short term is surprising in itself.
Countries like Romania are still having problems in conversion training on F16s from Soviet jets, it's been a decade since they got those planes and they have full access to NATO training, that's a tough timeline for Ukraine to beat.
Wow. No offense but have you been seriously brainwashed?! The media keeps telling us stuff that you parrot since the BEGINNING of the war and you still fall for it? Says a lot about you and why our own propaganda works and on whom.
Truly informative. Tks a lot for those itws of all those good specialists... I can follow easely their insights of high level. Yur site is a good one. I like to view yur vids daily.
Japan lost the war and it's attack on India failed. Just like Russia the Japanese had been planning and preparing for years once the allies woke up japan failed. You also have your figures wrong the Japanese casualties was 9824 for the battle of Singapore. Both territory were taken back by the allies within a few years.
Nobody talks about something that is missing. There used to be almost daily news of arson fires within Russia. This method of warfare seemed to have a large psychological impact, especially as the Russians did not know who was doing it. I haven't heard of any such fires in the last six months to a year. Does this mean that Russia caught or killed the perpetrators? Or that Ukraine stopped supporting this tactic?
@@simonh5232 No, I just despise liars. Britain is the USA's poodle so it's media has to shovel BS at us. You can find an army of honest journalists, military types, retired CIA, etc who will tell you the truth. Judge Napolitano has them on daily.
I was a civilian medic in Ukraine in 22, so that was a long time ago. That said, the toll on the troops was less on the psyche and more on trigger fingers getting tired. The Ukrainian fighters were often battle hardened veterans with such a deep vested interest and high degree of patriotism that I didn't see wasting orcs weighing heavy on souls. That may be a bit less true for foreign fighters, and that was a long time ago.
Russia is using North Korean weapons and Iranian weapons to strike Ukrainian targets of importance. With that said Ukraine should be able to use it's allies weapons in any way it see's fit. If Russia can use it's allies weapons against Ukraine what's the problem with Ukraine using it's allies weapons against Russia? Ukraine will win this war if it can use the western weapons deep into Russia.
Warthogs are almost useless on a modern battlefield: they are extremely vulnerable to manpads and have way too little modern sensor tech to effectively find and identify targets. The gun requires a close attack with a predictable course, which is also suicidal near manpads or pantsir or frankly anything the Russians can use against air targets. The only good thing you can use then for is as bomb trucks (=missiles), and at that point you're better off just using a F-16. Most of these deficiencies were already known by the gulf war, which is why the gun was barely used anymore by the end of it. Missiles were simply much better. So, sadly brrrr only works if the enemy is low tech and has none of the above mentioned dangers available. I'm sorry.
@@tomw.6757 Yes, I believe they confuse the F-16s with their own tanks. Then I wonder what of their own junk they confuse with the two nuclear carriers they destroyed. 🤔
F-16 is built to send A to A metal tubes beyond visible range. That takes huge skill and experience especially as just one will probably not do the job. The pilot also has to avoid “stuff” coming the other way. Last of all US is not providing their best equipment, because they can’t risk the technology getting into enemy hands.
If want to know how to fly and fight a fighter airplane ask a fighter pilot not an arm chair fighter pilot on RUclips. All of the guest speakers are experts in their field including retired fighter pilots, army officers and navy officers.
2 месяца назад+1
S-500 Prometheus loss would be pricey. Supposedly, according to typical Russian BS, it has anti-satellite capabilities with 77N6-N1 interceptors.
The Russian Air Force is not a factor because the simple fact is that every aircraft that they lose represents to equivalent of anywhere from 500,000 - 5,000,000 barrels of oil. Oil that instead of being removed from global supply actually has to be added to the global supply just to cover the costs of a lost aircraft. Black Sea Fleet vessels essentially pose the same dilemma. The West is vastly better off supplying anti-aircraft and anti-ship systems instead of having Russian oil infrastructure destroyed.
I was listening to someone who trains fighter pilots and he thinks it’s a much more complex issue to adapt pilots to F-16, how he described it was taking IndyCar driver and sticking them in an F1 car, yes they look kinda similar and they are both very fast, but some top IndyCar drivers have struggled to get an F1 car around the track, the technology is so different and many of your fixes and tricks to get the best from one just crashes the other, they spent so much time trying to get the pilots to unlearn habits from a much less complex aircraft and to do it right, the best success they have had is with the younger new pilots who haven’t trained with Russian aircraft, they are learning the controls tactics and combined forces techniques in a fraction of the time of the older pilots
The American military has adopted a system that tranfers the coordination and skills of video game players to their tech. Alot of our new tech is easy to use if you grew up a gamer. The hand eye shills developed over years are implemented by having the controls be similar in placement and movement as the video game controllers. Its a smart move. So yeah. Sometimes its easier to get a new person into our machines than to re-train a person who learned on migs..
So that's why Ukraine ordered the slingers from Australia. Preparing airfields with hard to detect radar / close range cheap firepower. Smart people Ukrainians
times radio likes to do this thing where they record a full interview, break it up into 5, 10 minute videos, publish those first, and then release the full thing later in order to double or even triple dip their view count
Just a guess, but I think UK will send a small group of secret observers throughout the countryside. Have them observe the Kursk airport and report the exact coordinates of the planes on the tarmac. Now that they've broken thru, I can see them wreaking havoc while this is going on.
Russian Soldier: _"How many Ukrainians must we get in order to survive and go home?"_ Russian Commander: _"I told you twice already! There are forty-four million of them!"_ Russian Soldier: _"How many Russian Leaders must we get in order to stop this madness?"_ Russian Commander: _"I told you three times already! There's JUST ONE!"_
Larry Johnson summed up Philip very well, as well as Doctor Gilbert Doctorow . Probably many others. Philip has no shame about making a fool of himself so as to enhance his bank balance.
North Korean troops.? Do yu know how many they are on ukr front? Just at least An evaluation.. Cose they were supposed to be dozen of thousands.... But nobody ever showed them on battle field. Just wondering...
I wish Times Radio would title their videos a little better. Like maybe telling us this is an aglomeration of recent interviews and not fresh material.
This is all good but it is just a compilation of stuff you have shown before. That's OK, but how about a statement of that so we don't waste time on it?
![FNAF vs TF2 - Episode 2 [SFM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z5b3V2-VLb0/mqdefault.jpg)
Russia's Gazprom losses nearly Double Year on Year Russian gas giant Gazprom suffered net losses from January to June 2024 almost double those in the same period last year, the Ukrainian media outlet enkorr reported on July 31. Losses in the first half of 2024 totalled 480.64 billion rubles ($5.5 billion), while those in the first half of 2023 totalled 255 billion rubles ($2.95 billion), according to Gazprom financial statements seen by the outlet. Gazprom has had a turbulent time since the launch of Russia's full-scale invasion - its revenue fell by 30% last year with a net loss of $6.9 billion, the largest in 25 years. Moscow's war in Ukraine led to worsening relations with Europe, limiting the operations of the company. "Gazprom is at a dead end, and they're very much aware of it," Ribakova said after reading the report. Gazprom announced Production has Fallen to USSR...1970s Levels "Everything According to Plan " 😀😀
No more extortion gas 😅
@@joelturley4847how do you know about it ?
And this is BEFORE THEY LOST THE DAMN OMSK REFINERY
IT'S A CATASTROPHE
His plan is clearly to implode his own country
UNITED KINGDOM IS BEST KINGDOM!
Thank you for your coverage
🇪🇺🇺🇦🏴🇺🇦🏴🇺🇦🇬🇧
Och aye totally agree
While it's true that the Ukrainian pilots need substantial training time to become competent on the F-16, their military as a whole has proven to be highly adept and adaptive under pressure. So if anything, the arrival of the F16s has been underhyped. The Ukrainian military has in the past surprised and even caught analysts off guard. If it wasn't all that, then the Ukrainians wouldn't have bothered.
Ukrainian men and women are fighting to keep their freedoms, Putin's lemmings are fighting for money, or simply because they are not strong enough to say no.
Yes I agree but in saying that I have no military training or expertise and watching youtube doesn't replace years of training and study.
Not really discussed publicly, but there are actually a fair number of veteran western military F-16 pilots both of Ukrainian ancestry and “foreign volunteers” already available to the Ukrainian Air Force to pilot donated F-16s and to both train and cadre Ukrainian F-16 squadrons. The same is true of ground and maintenance personnel. Some of those pilots even have combat experience.
I'm pretty sure the f-16 pilots have been training elsewhere and will be more than ready
No country can eat up losing a thousand men a day for long, I just dread to think at how many Ukraine is losing as well. I'm beginning to see what military commanders in Vietnam meant when they were saying how their government wasn't allowing them to win that war. It seems America had the same mindset when it comes to not allowing Ukraine to strike prime, big, juicy targets in Russia. They are costing their allies thousands of lives with such rules. Maybe tens of thousands of lives. They must revise these backward rules.
pro ukraine people still don't understand that ukraine deep striking Russia with nato missiles and nato intelligence and with nato specialists handling the weapons is like nato deeps striking into Russia and Russia would respond directly against nato this is why they aren't allowing it.
And that would require a massive political decision by Biden and I believe that is beyond his mental acuity.
The Ukies don’t use meatwaves in the same way
@@billbellell9462Trump 2024 😂
@@bigbearlogic6414 I voted for Trump, twice. Now, I have to vote for Trump because I do not want a socialist Harris as President
Excellent contribution by Col Phillip Imgram , well explained easy to understand , this guy knows his stuff & recognises the Ukraines are doing a tremendous job at reducing the , Russian offensive attacks with a lot less men , stopping the Russian offensive several times a day .
Looking at Russian tank losses , I feel they will run out of Tanks by late fall & their artillery pieces are in a similar shape , daily being destroyed , barrels wearing out & problems with Ammo stocks under constant Interdiction by Ukraine .
With a reduced working population causeling production to fall in all sectors & their services infestructure also suffering very badly , will cause Russia to go on the back foot as winter starts adding to their problems of fresh troops with very little training adapting to winter conditions .
The Russians will start to find supply problems of armoured vehicles, ammo stocks constantly being interdicted & men shortages as winter sets in on half trained troops .
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 , 🇬🇧
They need two things to take the pressure off of the Ukrainians on the front line. 1) stop restrictions on use of western weapons in Russia. 2) more fighter jets.
Thankyou but I think they need a lot more than that. They need artillery still and they need more soldiers.
Western countries could actively man the northern border with Belarus etc. That would free a lot of Ukrainian manpower without being overtly aggressive.
I disagree, even having a few fighter jets is going to be useful, until they get more. Ukraine also has the superior intelligence.
They have ten & growing
As long as the line holds. Only a soldier on the front line knows that.
Yes, ancient jets from the 1970s will help.
To fly and return from missions is best abetted by having large attack groups. A half dozen F-16s is great for air defense. Need about 120 - 250 F-16s to have an effective attacking force.
@@dudeonyoutube They're not. The airframes are from the 1980s onwards but the technology in the planes is modern. Just like my computer is from the 2020s but the cabinet is from the early 1990s; that doesn't make the computer ancient, it's modern no matter the age of the box outside. The F-16 is still produced and modern produced or modern upgraded F-16s are nothing like the first F-16s of the 1970s. It's a completely different plane except the airframe.
Poorly trained troops, inferior weaponry, and an increasingly shrinking number of experienced officers are not winning strategies.
They dont have a choice
@@sabitrisugrim9050 They could end the war.
ruZZians do not understand self determination. They may complain but they will always obey until everything implodes.
ruZZia has always been this way.
A strategy that slowly bulldozes everything at great human cost does not need highly trained anyone. It’s how Russia beat Germany in 1945. It’s how they fought every war ever since.
@@sabitrisugrim9050
Actually they do. It’s called defection or just run away from Russia
Mind you, at the time of Afghanistan the USSR had 240 million( Russia has 140 mil.) people and included Ukraine..
@@roelkomduur8073
And they still lost the war despite the fact USSR only lost 20 thousand man during 10 years of war.
Now they have lost more than 580 thousand man in 2,5 years and the sanctions are much worse.
@@Molt.-ep7cu1indeed
@@Glenn-hm8sb
I think the Russian economy are harder than west point out.
The GNP is going up only because of the war economy.
The rest of the industry are left in a stand by and you cant just leave that in a stand by and then continue as nothing has happened.
That economy are not coming back.
No money are coming in
The biggest and most profitable company in Russia as Gazprom that made many billions in income and now today instead going heavy minus first time in history.
10 of thosands of Russian people will loose their job.
And by that all the secondary business will also go down.
Russia are now reaching Its peak when it comes to war industry.
Russia need another 500 thousand men to the war industry and next year the lack will be about 1 million.
Then you can try to imagine how it is in the civilian industry.
A lot of people that are needed in the civilian jobs are already working in war industry or are pushed to war and Its just getting worse.
We can already see the result of that.
A lot of catatstophe are happening around Russia citys after citys are flooded.
The infrastructure that you need entertaine are not done.
The water supply, Electric supply and many other things are just in a edge of a catatstophe.
@@Glenn-hm8sb
China’s economy is also faltering
😢😢😢😢😢😊@@Molt.-ep7cu1
Watching from Vancouver Canada 🇨🇦
Excellent and high quality guests. Thank you.
Thank you. Watching from Alaska.
🤔
Can you see the smoke from there
@@hvitekristesdod 🤣
Watching from Arizona 🇺🇸
God Bless 🙏🙏🙏 Ukraine with Victory and Justice ⚖️⚖️⚖️
HERE HERE!!!!!!!
You use Ukraine population as cannon food in your own frustrations against Russia.
Giving Ukraine everything it needs to win this war and Ukrainian integration into the EU and NATO is the west’s best self defense.
Adding Ukrainian forces to NATO would certainly make NATO much stronger.
Most supporting nations has already given Ukraine the latest and greatest, yet they keeping losing them due to their lack of competency so they had to store them 😂
And not just because it's killing Russians: it's also clearing off our older stock shelves and giving us the room to restock with new equipment, munitions, and tech.
@@jackson22668 if by competency, you mean training... i agree... if, on the other hand you mean a lack of skill/intelligence/bravery, i am fairly certain you are incorrect... one of the largest problems from what i can tell are the facts that they are getting the requirement AFTER they have needed it for a year or more and receiving the equipment in small amounts over a long time. SLAVA UKRAINE 🇺🇦🇺🇲
@@jackson22668 Not true. They have received " some " support, often long delayed, including modern weaponry, and some of the more capable kit comes with restrictions on how it can be used. I.e. Cannot be used to attack targets on Russian territory. There is a political reluctance to enable Ukraine with the latest and greatest and a free hand in the use of such assets.
Example. Russia intercepted high level government communications in Germany which revealed an intention to supply Taurus missiles to Ukraine. The response from Russia was to inform Germany that if that were to happen they would consider Germany had formally entered the war as a combatant and would be treated as such. So, the politics comes into play along with other realities such as Germany's military being weak from decades of relying upon it's alliance as a NATO member to take their eye off the ball and not being in a position of strength to counter such threats. Training in the use of other assets like the F-16s takes time, and having the required mass to turn the tide isn't in place.
I think we can expect to see some shift in balance as these assets become employed. It will be small but significant, giving some relief and expanded opportunities to the canny Ukraine armed forces. Nothing is guaranteed, they need a lot more.
Just hearing Phillip say that today 1,300 souls left the Russian Armed Forces is so off-the-charts, it's impossible to imagine so many men lost.
First day on the Somme...57,000 UK casualties
I have really enjoyed this series of interviews. Hats off to the interviewer, who asks sharp, pertinent questions, and he is a very good listener. Well done all and thanks.
Just a question for Russians. What do you think happens when we over here in western countries actually start fighting? How do you think things would go in St. Petersburg with the Finnish armed forces alone? I don’t wish to negate the great efforts that Ukrainians have been making for their territories for an age, but I ask Russians to wake up. You had plenty of chance to make positive impact on Ukraine as an ally, but the majority have seen joining Europe and west as better for their future. Flattening their eastern cities only has hardened that resolve.
Ну так начните. Какое орудие установлено на вашем диване? 😂
@@АндрейКравченко-э2кare saying that Mr Putin is lying to you? NATO forces aren't actually fighting the great Russian forces yet?!
Question to all pro-Russia posters.
How can ANY force on Earth possibly hope to occupy territory when they are opposed by a conglomeration of the wealthiest and most powerful nations in human history who have unlimited resources and time at their disposal, who can target and strike you around the clock with impunity?
Russia doesn't want to occupy all of Ukraine. They just want a neutral Ukraine. As for your "most powerful nations in human history", their day has passed, their resources are far, far less than Russia and China and their time is running out. You need to wake up to the new reality.
No one have to be pro-russian to answer that. There are tools for pacifying civilians, there are tools to pacify Ukrainians. Russia could any time delete Ukrainian electrical grid/ plants fully, not just in 50%. Ukraine is already bankrupted. Civilians want peace more and more.
Napoleon did it a brunch of time
Sure if this war ends up stretching for a other decade Russia might not be able to keep up, right now they are producing more than all nato countries combined
If peace is reached soon as I hope for there might be a war 2.0 in the future that might end Russia influence
But for now Ukraine’s lower manpower and lack of shells and air defense is putting Russia in a strong position to dictate the future outcome
The better question is why didn’t Ukraine wait to join nato?
That’s the main reason for the war imo
War is terrible and needs to be avoided at all cost
Putin f’ed up
But the west also f’ed up
The need to come to the negotiating table wayyyyy before the war started but they just didn’t want to play ball
All the best to you 😊
Through cyber attacks and spreading disinformation on social media thereby causing chaos in those societies and diverting resources and attention to the real problem.
🤦😂🤏🧠
Thanks!
What a great explanation of how Ukraine has so cleverly played their cards as the man in the middle. Right; they’ve trained with both the Russians and the West. They know how stagnant and unwieldy Russian command & control often is and how flexible and surprisingly devastating the west’s operational control can be when.
As an American. It's really frustrating, and disappointing that America hasn't taken the lead, on suppling fighter aircraft to Ukraine. America has moth balled fighters sitting in Arizona, that wouldn't take much to refurbish and send to Ukraine . Granted they're aircraft with a lot of hours on them. But if asked, I'm sure Ukraine would jump at the chance to get their hands on them. These are aircraft that the US is never going to use again. And there's a number of different models, F-14's, F-15's, F-16's, F-18's, A-10's etc. these are all aircraft that Ukraine could put to good use.
Now getting our worthless politicians to grow a pair, and make this happen is probably the hardest part.
The difficulty of flying Lockheed planes for ex-Soviet trained pilots has been well-known for over 20 years. The surprise expressed by commentators that the F16s are not going to make a miraculous difference in the short term is surprising in itself.
Countries like Romania are still having problems in conversion training on F16s from Soviet jets, it's been a decade since they got those planes and they have full access to NATO training, that's a tough timeline for Ukraine to beat.
Went to A talk by the Presedent of Gasprom (a big man) at Pembrok Collage Oxford, quite a few years ago. Tim
The F16s are a game changer. The Term game changer doesn't mean the jets can win the war it means the jets will change the game in your favour
And save lives of Ukrainians ground troops.
Great report
Russia are in much worse condition than we all can imagine.
The Russian economy are going straight down to the bottom.
ROFLMAO!
@@dudeonyoutubeThis comment is pure pro russian propaganda!
Wow. No offense but have you been seriously brainwashed?! The media keeps telling us stuff that you parrot since the BEGINNING of the war and you still fall for it? Says a lot about you and why our own propaganda works and on whom.
@@dudeonyoutubeboris, why dont you buy some coca cola not from Kazakhstan? 😂
@@hymen2393those clowns have such a limited response list 😅
Thank you. Very interesting and useful.
Truly informative. Tks a lot for those itws of all those good specialists... I can follow easely their insights of high level. Yur site is a good one. I like to view yur vids daily.
They will use the jets strategically.
💙💛💪👍
Love your attitude about this bag and not caring about what people will say. kislux You are right keep your head up and no your priorities.
Have you thought about having Ukrainian subtitles for your posts?
Maybe you have,tellus how?
Your coverage is great👍🇺🇦
In the battle of Singapore, Japan lost 1000 soldiers and took 100,000 POWs.
In the battle of Hong Kong, Japan lost 700 soldiers and took 10,000 POWs.
Japan lost the war and it's attack on India failed. Just like Russia the Japanese had been planning and preparing for years once the allies woke up japan failed. You also have your figures wrong the Japanese casualties was 9824 for the battle of Singapore. Both territory were taken back by the allies within a few years.
So?
Game changing
...that's sickening
❤ Ukrainian ❤
Slava Ukraini!🇺🇦🔱💪🏾
Nobody talks about something that is missing. There used to be almost daily news of arson fires within Russia. This method of warfare seemed to have a large psychological
impact, especially as the Russians did not know who was doing it. I haven't heard of any such fires in the last six months to a year. Does this mean that Russia caught or killed
the perpetrators? Or that Ukraine stopped supporting this tactic?
The more one clings to power,The more it slips away...Lao Duh.
Slava Ukraine.
3 Great interviewees, thank you, however they would be better as three separate interviews
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦✌🇺🇦🇺🇦✌🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
Very informative
The russians trained the mothers of these last couple generations not to give a heck about their sons.
Da!
U take alcoholic son and I can has bag o fisch and potato! Da!
No such thing as a game changer at this level of warfare. Unless the weapon system can end the war it isn't one.
An average of 1,100 Troops lost equates to 400K annualised!!! !,300 lost per dfay gets awfully close to 500K annualised!!! That is ruinous!!!
🤦😂🤏🧠
This is why Zelensky is now drafting girls. He is a butcher.
@@dudeonyoutubeit’s ok you’re sad about all your dead Russian comrades. 🥲
@@dudeonyoutubelol. This channel really triggers you.
@@simonh5232 No, I just despise liars. Britain is the USA's poodle so it's media has to shovel BS at us.
You can find an army of honest journalists, military types, retired CIA, etc who will tell you the truth. Judge Napolitano has them on daily.
I was a civilian medic in Ukraine in 22, so that was a long time ago. That said, the toll on the troops was less on the psyche and more on trigger fingers getting tired. The Ukrainian fighters were often battle hardened veterans with such a deep vested interest and high degree of patriotism that I didn't see wasting orcs weighing heavy on souls. That may be a bit less true for foreign fighters, and that was a long time ago.
Good on ya Times Radio when you attract this many Russian trolls you know you are doing something right 😂
Russia is using North Korean weapons and Iranian weapons to strike Ukrainian targets of importance. With that said Ukraine should be able to use it's allies weapons in any way it see's fit. If Russia can use it's allies weapons against Ukraine what's the problem with Ukraine using it's allies weapons against Russia? Ukraine will win this war if it can use the western weapons deep into Russia.
Africa, N. Korea, and China; i think Putin is also trying to recruit in the Middle East.
No country will support Russia in Ukraine, apart for a motley bunch of mercenaries. Putin's army is trapped in the east.
Putin would recruit Martians to fight in his imperialist war if he could.
Why not give the A10 warthog as well since US is doing away with it?
These can do a lot of damages to the armor vehicles and forces on the ground.
Warthogs are almost useless on a modern battlefield: they are extremely vulnerable to manpads and have way too little modern sensor tech to effectively find and identify targets. The gun requires a close attack with a predictable course, which is also suicidal near manpads or pantsir or frankly anything the Russians can use against air targets. The only good thing you can use then for is as bomb trucks (=missiles), and at that point you're better off just using a F-16.
Most of these deficiencies were already known by the gulf war, which is why the gun was barely used anymore by the end of it. Missiles were simply much better.
So, sadly brrrr only works if the enemy is low tech and has none of the above mentioned dangers available. I'm sorry.
@@kristian2353 well explained…thanks
@@2-worlds-on-earth you're welcome!
In the interest of full disclosure, this is a bit controversial so others may disagree.
They just nidified and keeping it thru 2035
Hasn't Russia already destroyed 3,078 F-16s? Or maybe it was 11,273,
Is "F-16" code for Russian tanks? If so.....yes.
Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
@@tomw.6757 Yes, I believe they confuse the F-16s with their own tanks. Then I wonder what of their own junk they confuse with the two nuclear carriers they destroyed. 🤔
No,I think it was more like a million or was it two million?
@@MrSpratters Yes, more or less. And two nuclear carrier groups.
Stop the war and go for peace!!!
Wishful thinking.. This war is making rich investors more wealthy.
❤❤❤❤
This is third time you've repeated this interview. It's not new, so why say it is?
Amen
Because everything on this channel is propaganda and lies.
F-16 is built to send A to A metal tubes beyond visible range. That takes huge skill and experience especially as just one will probably not do the job. The pilot also has to avoid “stuff” coming the other way. Last of all US is not providing their best equipment, because they can’t risk the technology getting into enemy hands.
If want to know how to fly and fight a fighter airplane ask a fighter pilot not an arm chair fighter pilot on RUclips. All of the guest speakers are experts in their field including retired fighter pilots, army officers and navy officers.
S-500 Prometheus loss would be pricey. Supposedly, according to typical Russian BS, it has anti-satellite capabilities with 77N6-N1 interceptors.
This means the British fleet is dated.
The Russian Air Force is not a factor because the simple fact is that every aircraft that they lose represents to equivalent of anywhere from 500,000 - 5,000,000 barrels of oil. Oil that instead of being removed from global supply actually has to be added to the global supply just to cover the costs of a lost aircraft. Black Sea Fleet vessels essentially pose the same dilemma.
The West is vastly better off supplying anti-aircraft and anti-ship systems instead of having Russian oil infrastructure destroyed.
As you fight in Russia please send out the red luft ballons saying i want to live and must surrender.
Putin, keep sending them, we will give them express check in, and we will send them home free of charge You dope !.
I was listening to someone who trains fighter pilots and he thinks it’s a much more complex issue to adapt pilots to F-16, how he described it was taking IndyCar driver and sticking them in an F1 car, yes they look kinda similar and they are both very fast, but some top IndyCar drivers have struggled to get an F1 car around the track, the technology is so different and many of your fixes and tricks to get the best from one just crashes the other, they spent so much time trying to get the pilots to unlearn habits from a much less complex aircraft and to do it right, the best success they have had is with the younger new pilots who haven’t trained with Russian aircraft, they are learning the controls tactics and combined forces techniques in a fraction of the time of the older pilots
The American military has adopted a system that tranfers the coordination and skills of video game players to their tech.
Alot of our new tech is easy to use if you grew up a gamer.
The hand eye shills developed over years are implemented by having the controls be similar in placement and movement as the video game controllers.
Its a smart move.
So yeah.
Sometimes its easier to get a new person into our machines than to re-train a person who learned on migs..
Ukraine is using Prisoners as well.
Source: russian propaganda. 😂
Yes they are but only low risk inmates, and volunteers only.
@@freebolt5913 really, its the same. a There's no such thing as a honest crook!
@@Sokrates66 its public knowledge. Google is your fiend.
The Poo should starting send women and children any day now.
So that's why Ukraine ordered the slingers from Australia. Preparing airfields with hard to detect radar / close range cheap firepower.
Smart people Ukrainians
We’ve been hearing similar narratives for the past 2 years now. Just when is the Russians running out?
Wow these people in this channel
Too many "You knows". No, we don't know, that's why we've tuned in.
Sometimes things are not what they seem. Russia is far weaker than they look.
👍 👍 👍 👍 👍 👍
Have this video been published before???
times radio likes to do this thing where they record a full interview, break it up into 5, 10 minute videos, publish those first, and then release the full thing later in order to double or even triple dip their view count
yes
Yes🎉🎉🎉🎉
Just a guess, but I think UK will send a small group of secret observers throughout the countryside. Have them observe the Kursk airport and report the exact coordinates of the planes on the tarmac. Now that they've broken thru, I can see them wreaking havoc while this is going on.
Why do i feel like i saw this already 🤔
Putin is getting rekt.
Putin has no troops from Moscow or St Petersburg yet.
This is amazing.
As soon as he starts to use them, its all over.
Agree
The Russian Army is trapped in east Ukraine.
It‘s been the third year of the “Kiev in 3 days” war. The russkies still thought they are “winning” 😂
Russian Soldier: _"How many Ukrainians must we get in order to survive and go home?"_
Russian Commander: _"I told you twice already! There are forty-four million of them!"_
Russian Soldier: _"How many Russian Leaders must we get in order to stop this madness?"_
Russian Commander: _"I told you three times already! There's JUST ONE!"_
Украинцев уже давно не 44 млн.
@@АндрейЖуков-ш1д _It sounds as though you're confessing to a rather horrendous crime._ - j q t -
Black Sea Fleet: no one mention the SBS
Isto se chama desespero.
É o Zé querendo mostar que ainda tem alguma utilidade para EUA e OTAN.
Larry Johnson summed up Philip very well, as well as Doctor Gilbert Doctorow . Probably many others. Philip has no shame about making a fool of himself so as to enhance his bank balance.
Leave no dictator remaining on the Russian Continent
i'm a UGE fan of gloobal par!
Yes but they are still eating the map!!!
I wish putin could wise up and see the light.peace is possible Ukraine 🇺🇦 wants peace.maybe the Russian people can make a difference. Stand up please.
You're not listening the 70+% support Russian occupation on the annexed territories
NK troops are "game" changers.
The British are scared.
I doubt North Korean troops will be in theatre.
Based on their performance so far, none of their Navy any where in the world could last more than one day against a real navy.
Putin wants Ukraine because its men have spine, resolve, fortitude and will.
It's almost as if he wants the excuse
Russia says the Afghanistan cost them 15,000 men. In reality, it was 15,000 per year probably a great deal more. They were there for 10 years.
THE MEN IN THE ARMY HAVE WEAPONS AND COULD REVOLT EASIER THAN THE PUBLIC WHO IS AFRAID OF SPEAKING UP WITHOUT BACKLASH...!
So what you're saying is that the Ukraine doesn't stand a cat in hell's chance and should just roll over. Somehow, I don't think they want to.
Another repeat broadcast. SOOOO lazy.
Another Repeat, The Times gets it's money's worth.
What about the German reconfigure tanks that were going to be used to destroy Russian drones
North Korean troops.?
Do yu know how many they are on ukr front? Just at least An evaluation..
Cose they were supposed to be dozen of thousands.... But nobody ever showed them on battle field.
Just wondering...
I wish Times Radio would title their videos a little better. Like maybe telling us this is an aglomeration of recent interviews and not fresh material.
Slava Ukraine
This is all good but it is just a compilation of stuff you have shown before. That's OK, but how about a statement of that so we don't waste time on it?