Mountbatten on Nehru & Jinnah: Notice the Difference
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2020
- Mountbatten first met Nehru and his wife in 1946 and their friendship was formed when he came to India as Viceroy. However, things with Jinnah never went smoothly. The biggest reason was that Mountbatten wanted to avoid partition, just like Nehru, while Jinnah saw partition and Pakistan as his main goal.
Till April 1947, Mountbatten argued with Jinnah to try and convince him to accept Cabinet Mission Plan that would have averted partition. But in vain. So, in May he hatched his own partition plan and sent it to Whitehall for approval. When it came back, Nehru was shown the approved version, not Jinnah. Nehru rejected it as it meant balkanization of India. So, Menon's Plan was accepted that allowed only Pakistan and India to be created. No province could declare independence.
Jinnah-Mountbatten distrust had severe consequences for Jinnah chose to be Governor-General instead of Mountbatten and Mountbatten chose to be more partial than impartial especially on the vital issues of Boundary Commission and Kashmir.
Further reading: Schofield (2003), Lamb (1991), Raghavan (2009), Hajari (2015), Wolpert (1983), Menon (1957).
Jinnah was cold because he was on business tour to settle agreement good for majority of people who had faith in him……………..he was not on emotional tour to boost friendship with royals
Because Jinnah could smell the unfaithfulness, dishonesty and sickening habit of betrayal from these European colonizers from a mile away.
He wasn’t that simple, racist or hateful. He was a barrister. He was shrewd and knew that he wasn’t getting a great deal. He didn’t get a great deal and he never would have.
With his intellect, shrewdness and knowledge of history, it’s still shocking how he could have played into the hands of the British. They could’ve decided to vote, in the future, or create independent self-governing states instead of undergoing an entire partition that lead to awful atrocities.
We complain about what the British did but we also did it to ourselves, when we tried to gain independence. It was the biggest partition in the history of the 20th century.
Jinnah should have known that large countries have many problems. A country that has many religions, castes, fluctuating literacy rates, levels of education and regional cultures, will always have problems. That is inevitable. Until a time comes when they are all highly educated and economically well off.
The more differences there are in socio economic status, the more problems there are.
I mean jinnah was literally groomed by the europeans right
@@Ashnesss bro do you think once the union had been created they would let us off no never looking at Muslims rn in India Jinnah was right there was only a subcontinent never a country
Unfortunately Jinnah died a year later and so did his plans for pakistan. Nehru lived for another 16 years. Both men were good leaders but we didn't get to see Jinnah plans for pakistan.
Nehru was bad
ruclips.net/video/SrvqK3DVuko/видео.html
see indian media telling jinnah & nehru are half brothers
Jinnah's first plan is to invade jammu and kashmir . 😂
Jinnah had no plans for Pakistan. He was a politician and a lawyer not a leader.
Nehru was a liar , we dont like nehru. Here we means we as an indians.
‘He was cold’ because he wanted to secure a fair deal for his nation and didn’t want a wishy-washy agreement!
LOL
Jihnah was not there to be his friends he was there real bussniess nothing more nothing less. that is why you don't mix business with pleasure
And he got a wishy-washy agreement
Yet Pakistan is failed state today
He didn’t get a fair deal and he never would have. Partition is never fair or easy.
Jinnahsaab was "cold" according to Mountbatten because he did not play to the tunes of the British and this man who only got the job because he had connections. The latter is a fact, check it even in British History.
The Iron Man "Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah rehmat-ul-Lah eleih" ❤️🇵🇰🙏
Aur kya churayenga?
@typkmb5583 : U infidle are always cry and cry and cry for no reason. Poor "Gentoo"
Iron man only sardar Patel 😂
Hahaha. He was cold for a reason my friend I hope you all got it already
He wanted muslims to live in dignity and freedom
can i ask why Mr. Jinnah had so much affection for cars and properties?! can i ask why he did not bother to question silence of rural punjbais and sindhis for separation?!!! his support came from Bengal and some states from India, why didnt he question that?!
This is the slap on face on those,especially "Pakistani Indians" who always blames Jinnah as agent of British.
Actually it was Nehru, not Jinah who was British agent and"Ashiq" of baby Mountbatten.
Even a person of that time knows how great was nehru who advocated for rights of even a common poor indian who has nothing but on the other hand Jinnah didnt ever give right to choose bengali to your own people and you are here criticising nehru, How dare you
@@rishabhrockstar5739 That's the difference between nehru and Jinnah. Jinnah always spoke for all humanity but nehru only spoke for India.
Jinnah's country is a failed state today
@@healthylifehub8089 anyone who "speaks for humanity" is a bla bla machine. All talk no action.
Cant even pick up the garbage in your own world you have the arrogance to want to clean up the whole world ?!
@@healthylifehub8089 If that is so then why did Pakistan 🇵🇰 today is a bankrupt state? No economic progress. Human development index wise Pakistan 🇵🇰 is behind than even Bangladesh 🇧🇩 😳
If Britishers had such an attitude towards Me Jinnah then how come indians say that Mr Jinnah had a pact with Britishers for Making Pakistan??
It only proves that Jinnah was a true spirit.
Jinnah n british r responsible for partition more than nehru
@@surabhigupta9767 but partition is a good way to get freedom from britishers if you have any problem so come and jihaad with us
@@arhamtariq8922 yes , always remember , religion is greater than humanity 😃👌
nehru had an affair with mountbattens wife which was proven later by letters that were sent by both of them and the letters prove that he used this affair to make deals with mountbatten
@@abbasali597 absolutely nonsense there is no proof regarding this
Please mountbatten also tell us about the relations of Nehru with lady mountbatten
The only good thing in this video is Jinnah's smile.
Sala qatil h
@@middleclassmc9202 no
so true, dil khush ho gaya such mein
He was cold buddy because he meant business and vision and he knew what he wanted for his people and dam right he did it
Damn right he did it, he created a country that is the jihadi hotbed of the world and a begging bowl. Poverty, illiteracy, fundamentalism and backwardness are still massive features of Pakistan. Well done Jinnah. No one likes Pakistan. Even the Saudi's keep the relationship purely pragmatic. What has Pakistan produced that is of worth since partition?
@@Phil_Mitchell India is the filthiest country on face the earth with totaling 1/3 of the world poverty living in India,to 50% population got no access toilets. Hindutva terrorism is no more a surprise for the world. ISIS headquarters in Kerala are known to world who are terrorisng peopel in Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and other neighbouring countries.
What Pakistan has produce, has made India paralysed.
In fact India is mother of all evil in South Asia and its Pakistan duty to protect itself and others from Indias evil.
@@isckami Why are you mentioning India? I'm English lmao. But then again, it says a lot about you if any sense of rebuttal towards Pakistan results in you deflecting the issue and talking about India lol. I know my own country's mistake of giving to Islamic victimhood demands of partitioning India and we can see the fruits of that now. Hindutva is nothing compared to what Islamic jihad has done in the region. What's India's equivalent of the rape and genocide of millions of Bengalis? Or the financing and direct support of a the Taliban which hosts Bin Laden who launches a global jihad right next door to the country Pakistan influences. And then Pakistan plays the 'who, me?' stupid card when Bin Laden is caught red handed right outside the Pakistani military academy. It's no secret Pakistan is one of the biggest state sponsors of terrorism in the world. You want to list weak grievances, list ahead. I'm here for you, I really am lol.
@@isckami what about yr country? Place full of jihadis we went to mars and you are still obsessed with kashmir
@@Phil_Mitchell Pakistan was a vision. It would be inappropriate to call it a "jihadi state". However the RAPE OF 1 MILLION BENGALI GIRLS ARE A BLOT TO THEM THAT WILL NEVER GO AWAY.
Mr. Jinnah was a great leader and proud to be as Pakistani. They fought for Muslim community and free from British. Great honor for us. We all Pakistanis salute to him.
Tbhi yo aaj tk ek haat nhi uthaya or kbhi jail nhi gaya or isi k wajah se lakhon logon k khoon hua.Is sale ko Jahannam m bhi jagah na mile
Abe ye kab se azadi dilwaya angrezon se angrejon se azadi Subhash chandr bose k zariye mila ji hindu the ye to sirf dekh rha tha ki jb azadi milega tb turant Pakistan bnwaunga.
Bye the way jinnah father was punj lal takkar.
Indeed
Bikhari ban gaya pakistan or kya chahiye tumko
Ironic gandhi jinnah and patel all three belonged to gujrat
Bombay state was the main economic hub of the greater India, Bomabay and Karachi were main hubs for Indian imports and exports its natural to have higher education and wealth in these cities.
Patel had an offer with Liaquat Ali Khan, the offer was to exchange Kashmir with Hyderabad's claim but of course Nehru was a Kashmiri Hindu so he forced to claim Kashmir and he was the main reason of all the wars and unrest!
And it's also well Know Gujrati don't go well along with each other
So also Morarji and Modi
@@cp12298well it was Liaquat stupidity not accepting Kashmir for Hyderabad plus nehru was right for insisting on Kashmir Jammu and ladakh areas have hindu and Buddhist majority respectively and it also has rich vasinhno Devi temple
Nehru built ISRO, DRDO, IIT universities, scientific temperament in constitution and world's largest democracy in the world.
The fact I see your name written as such, I think he created many idiots too...
Ohh Hell yeahh broo!🇮🇳
One of the most ineffective democracies at that. Combined with copious British stooging, Nehru was as deplorable as they come. Quaid built an entire nation as an effective safe haven for millions.
@@2ad4ddd lol
@@2ad4ddd he did succeeded making India regional power. Most of Indian CEOs graduated from his IIT universities. Sunder Oichai is one of them. ISRO which he inaugurated is doing excellent job. They have reached mars. Democracy is still functioning. Like it or not World loves Nehruvian India, its romance with democracy. Including Muslim countries.
Quaid Azam Jinnah understood the British and the Hindu better than anyone else.
Maybe but failure of Pakistan 🇵🇰 to establish herself as an economic powerhouse shows that everything Nehru did was to create a better India 🇮🇳 Today we have a higher standard of living and Pakistan 🇵🇰 is a poverty stricken land
@@krishnendubasu5936 that’s because Nehru died 17 years after India gained Independence whilst Jinnah died only a year after Independence
_Uss bhosdi wale ko sach mai kaid kr ke uski fursat li kyu nhi kisine! Kissi Pashtun ko hi 69 rupees de dete, usne hi le leni thi apne "Quid-e- Azam" ki..._ 🤣
@@krishnendubasu5936 this is not jinnah's fault
@@krishnendubasu5936 Pakistan is land of the Indus Valley... You Hindus should respect your father civilization.
Even your name India comes from our River Indus.
We're very happy to know that he was cold to you. I am sure he was only straightforward and refused to give in to your shameless cunning demands.
Jinnah was like: what a fool i am in this so-called official meeting today ….wasting my precious time for no-gain at the end…..how unprofessional this viceroy is
Happy independence day guys 🇮🇳🥳
FOR WHAT?!
The people here are still suffering from atrocious taxation, slow justice and misuse of public funds.
Did someone tell him, nehru was having fun with his wife. Apparently he knew, in a documentary, his daughter suggested they had an open marriage.
If you can sell your wife to a man, what kind of man are you? Mountbatten.
amen to that!!! look india muslim they live hel now!! pakistian may not be rich but boy oh boy it is beatiful friendly loving people. i would any day in pakistan then india
An Englishman..lol
@@sophiedion1738 lmao
@@sophiedion1738 you should atleast try to improve your English before acting as an English woman lol
@@gaurangtiwari1563 You should get a toilet
*The partition of India was a tragedy!*
*If it had stayed together and became a secular state with religious freedom for all citizens and swift/harsh punishment for those who* *persecuted others for their religion* -- The entire sub-continent could have been prosperous because of its huge population (labor force).
With English as a common language, alongside the regional languages (unification and the rise of very good universities); the UN aiding
India (agricultural experts, inoculations, etc.) and the British Commonwealth trade bloc (captive market) things could have been good
for all of India, and most of the citizens post-Independence.
O that smile of my Jinnah .. I love it
Till the day of judgement Jinnah will be right
Agree from bangladesh
This Mountbatten , he was not in this position because of ability he was in this position because of accident of birth. He was born into privilege unlike the great Jinnah who was born into poverty and with guts and determination made his way to the top. Who does Mountbatten think he is making judgements on people.
Cold, says a British. the irony
He was cold because he did not suck up to the British Rulers and wanted fair deal for the free Muslims. 💞🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰💞
There is No mention here of the special relationship between Edwina and Nehru here or was that part censored as adult content?
@@AhmedAli-wt2qh irrelevant
@@altanigrum6448 tell that to indians, who think getting a leg over edwina, a whity, by their brown PM, was retribution for 2 hundred rule.
It's difficult to say who was the greater leader - Nehru who had the well being of both Hindus and Muslims on his mind or Mr. Jinnah who was determined to protect the interest of his people and take what was rightfully theirs.
I guess it's a very difficult question. History will judge. In 1971 Pakistan was divided and Bangladesh came into existence. So Jinnah's legacy took a beating. But then all the Nehru family members died a brutal death. So their legacy took a beating as well.
Only time and history will tell who was the greater leader and a greater person.
Not really. 2 state theory lives as India remains divided. The legacy would've had taken a beating if Bangladesh would have joined India.
ruclips.net/video/izl9YOQUXXY/видео.html
@@yournightmare2019 India had all the power in the world to fully annex Bangladesh having won the 1971 war and even snatch out a chunk of Pakistan's territory as it held more than 90,000 Pakistani POWs as stake. Because of utter stupidity by Indra and her vicious and selfish wish to let India-Pakistan conflict broiling for another century so that Congress can continue with its usual politics in India is the real reason why a failed state like Pakistan still exists.
@@saintsoldier1640 I know you have insecurity for your toiletless cuntry of India which by definition is pathetic. You forget again, that 90k gave your 1:5 larger ratio army tough times not 1 but 3 times. Your Field Marshall says so in his interview. He even said they were planning for 5-6 months. That 90k were already miles from the mainland, away from ammunition and back up and fighting locally before the Indians even arrived. As for the western border, your military high rank himself said, it would have been a disaster for both countries had a full-scale war were to happen on the western border as most of the Indian army was stationed near Bangladesh at the time. Had the war continued, India would have lost Rajasthan and more. Compare yourself with China. The same population and militarily matched. Your jawans were in the mainland, had ammunition and had back-up. What happened during that war? Why did the pampers soak wet during that time?
Go see a psychiatrist, my friend. You lost the war not one, all wars you fought with India. You left more than 90,000 POW's in our hands and we could have done anything with them. But we treated them with dignity and handed them back to you. This is India. That's why we succeed.
@@yournightmare2019 Next time we will have a war with you, we will annihilate you all together. But before that we will finish off the legacy of Imran Khan.
Jinnah zindabad ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Mountbatten played both sides. British army left, but they left Kashmir behind for both nations to fight over it and stay divided forever. Clever English men fooled all of us. 👈
Nehru said to Mountbatten did the British Government gave you huge powers Mountbatten oh my God I never told this to anyone how on earth Nehru knew all about this
where can I found the full lenght vido of Mountbatten speaking here?
In the gutter where Mountbatten was buried after IRA bruttully cut him to pieces.
"The Life & Times of Lord Mountbatten" on RUclips
@@altanigrum6448 Thanks!
@@muradlakhani5561 You are wrong. I think Jinnah is sleeping in that gutter. You didnt see properly 😂
For no reason except lie for an arguement u gotta grow up
yes he was breaker of India
and maker of Pakistan
mere Qaid tujhe salam
For creating a failed communal state?
Does anyone know why the movie Gandhi was dedicated to Lord Mountbatten (posthumously)?
Because Pandit Nehru and Lord Mountbatten had inspired Sir Richard to produce the Gandhi movie. Sir Richard had met them many times for suggestions and guidance as these were the only leading figures associated with Gandhi when he had started to research for his film.
In another 25 years, the year will be 2047 and we would have reached 100 years of independence. By now, the hurt and pain has decreased and hopefully, by 2047, the two countries will be able to trade, travel and share stories of lineage together.
Muhammad Ali Jinnah never declared an Islamic nation. He was not divisive. He sat in the company of intellectuals and had great men to bounce ideas off of and be inspired by.
He was liberal and progressive in his private and public life. It was disillusionment and the British that caused him to form a separate nation. Not logic. It is said that he regretted it later. I do think that he did. Most South Asians certainly do.
That does not take away his perseverance, resilience , magnificent career as a Barrister and his intellect. He was not at all conservative or traditionalist in his views. Jinnah and Nehru were called nationalists because they wanted independence.
Their nationalism has no similarity to the nationalism in Pakistan and India, today. Today, right-wing nationalism in Pakistan and India, includes a strong conservative religious identity. According to the political discourse of South Asia, today, Jinnah and Nehru would be called patriotic and progressive.
Like most intellectuals, the problems facing the country and regressive social attitudes, were not to be accepted but to be changed, monitored and eradicated. Unlike todays right-wing nationalists who make excuses for regressive actions, even if they lead to crime.
Pakistan does not have popular intellectuals today. That is why Pakistan political discourse has weakened and become regressive.
It is infrequent to see some really reasonable explanation like this. I won't lie, but I am getting a lot of Shashi Tharoor vibes from reading the comment... I feel like as more Indians and Pakistanis would open up and speak more logically, reasonably, sensibly, and intellectually, many perspectives would change amongst the people in South Asia. Unfortunately, most of the conversations I encountered with my Pakistani friends were mostly emotion-driven, sensitive, and highly passionate. I wouldn't want to test anyone's tolerance further, especially once I am aware of the outcome of being vocal, so I wouldn't usually discuss any issues on the topic of Partition or Religious differences or rather indifferences with them. However, I could only have my fingers crossed and hope for more South-Asians to speak as you did.
@@rishithakur7186 I understand what you mean. I have been on the receiving end of such emotions when I discuss religion or the partition. I find it rather silly.
I also think, that we cannot only look at the aspect of religion, when it comes to partition. We must also look at politics because that did play a role. Jinnah, Nehru and Gandhi were politicians.
@@Ashnesss Oh never, what I said in my comment was “religious differences or rather indifferences”. What I am trying to imply is I have witnessed a sentiment for separate state by some of my Pakistani friends which is based purely on the aspect of religion which to me is insignificant or not a strong reason to demand a separate based purely on someone’s personal beliefs or opinions or way of life or religion or whatsoever name people like giving it. A practical reason for separate state is linguistic which is not the case in the Subcontinent. There is a broader political agenda behind the division of the Subcontinent.. However, religion is not something that I could completely rule out because they had a strong believe in the cause for a separate state purely based on religion. So I had to say it in a way which also keeps their side… But emphasizing my notion clearly which is humanitarian indifferences…
@@rishithakur7186 Yes, some Pakistanis firmly believe that they separated because of religion, even if their parents were not religious and even if they were/are recent converts to Islam.
Unfortunately, that was the messaging that was spread at the time, which is why Muslims in Pakistan believe that they are better off than Muslims in India. But minorities in Pakistan are not better off, just like minorities in India, after BJP, are not better off. Pakistan and India have become two sides of the same coin.
I think, that Jinnah felt disillusioned and alone. It was not a democratic decision. Had he waited for independence and asked people to vote for or against the proposal of a separate state, the harm would have been mitigated as well as animosity between the two countries.
Yes. The political aspect of a political decision can never be undermined or ignored. I understand what you mean by a separate state based on religion. Most separate states, are regional and they usually have certain defining or differentiating traits, unique to their people, which is why they are governed as independent states by elected members who stem from the community.
Muslim-majority states or states with a significant Muslim population, could have done just that, to begin with. Like Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Bihar. States with significant Muslim, Christian or Dalit population, could have been governed self-governing states as well with representatives who are neutral and do not display an overt religious identity.
Good God. It takes a stupendous level of arrogance to site one's own personal opinions as facts.
"It is said that he (Jinnah) later regretted the creation of a separate nation state (Pakistan)."
Where is the evidence for this blatant lie? And I say this because there are heaps of actual evidences to the contrary to what you've written.
Smh.
Interesting Factoid: There was plan by Gandhiji to give Jinnah sahab first prime ministership but Mr Nehru and all Congress leaders disagreed as they didnt want to set a precedent of unelected prime ministers and Mr Jinnah knew he would lose to Nehru as he has seen in 1938 elections muslim league lost heftly to congress but eventually Mr.Nehru took first PM role without elections or until elections
India is and always belong to the God's Forever
😂😂😂
God made Jinnah very beautiful and his smile, and his vision were as amazing and beautiful as he was himself
Bro that sounds so gay
Jinnah is like skeleton wearing a suit.
He dedicated his entire life for Pakistan
He was a tuberculosis patient from 1946 . He was a chain smoker also.. pls read book Freedom at midnight by Larry collins and Dominique lapierre.. That is why he was too thin..
He was a patient of TB and TB causes this thinness
He was dying mate.... Still more of a man than u will ever be.
Still looking great.....
The Angrez which means English Government had sent the Mountbattens to India because the country itself it very hot climate
One can see the statue of Lord Nataraj beside his table. They really loved India and her culture
Jinnah lived among the European for a large part of his life. He knew more than many others. He knew their nature and how to treat them to Get a Fair Deal for his people. He knew their decivious nature. So He tried to become a person British Cannot Decive. To show that he isn't Flexible or interested in British Favours for himself but Interested only and only for Creating a nation for His people. Politics and Personal life should be separate. But sadly The Britishers did Deceive. Kashmir a Muslim Majority boardering Pakistan, left it as a bone of Contention between us.
While Nehru from the Start had a Strong Position.Support of a Majority a Population. The Nation of India was confirmed to be made/decolonized. What he needed to Do was look worthy of a Leadership & Trust for British. Thus formed Personal relations, Bcz British always Reward those kinda people when they leave/decolonize, To at the least level protect British interests, i.e so If they can't Take advantage of Indian Resources anymore the least they can secure is India not becoming their 'Enemy'. And that Nehru developing personal relations with them, secured.
Lord Mountbatten mother Victoria which I seen the Mountbatten the last Viceroy was adamant her son sent by the Government she in real life you chose the Glamour of the thing
Love u Great Jinnah
Because you're responsible for the blood shed at partition and kashmiris, couldn't even do one job right
Who is responsible for the partition of United India? Over 200 years, the British government built and connected together United india. So tell me, was it really a represantive of British Empire who split India in two or someone else?
@@VK-zc2un Britain started their divide and rule policy. They divided the Hindu and Muslim parties when they were united at some point. And before the British came, India had been ruled as one for over 300 years. So what does that say?
No it’s jinnah
Either way living with the Hindus would've been rough if you're a minority, jinnah did the right thing
@@asinine_aarishruled by Muslims right?
Whats name of background music????? (seems like classical indian music)???
Quied-e-Azam ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ 🇵🇰
One needs to be cold to lead a cold blooded violence of partition. He was practicing to stay cold.
mountbatten led it and no one else, and he and his wife were really cosy with neru!
Jinnah had a great problem create Pakistan which means land of the Pure but Bharat Mata which means Mother India because someone called the land of the Gods
Pakka jahil wala comment....thoda to padha karo bhai history
Oscar goes to…
Nehru jad affairs with Mountbatten wife...mounbabtten given gurudaspur, Kashmir to india
Clip 36: Allama Mashriqi - the first to reject the Cripps Mission's proposals. Others followed
ruclips.net/video/b_-TVdxrPfs/видео.html
Mountbatten didn't allow Jinnah to get the Pakistan he wanted. He actively worked to make many princely states to join the new Indian state.
Even the Mahatma said I not the Mahatma only Lord Krishna Lord Ram Mother Sita true Gods
Ok bhakt , whatsapp University se kab passout ho gaye aap
This man MB was a'BHARWA' who was giving her wife a chance to intimate with Nehru.
Nehru worked on the fundamentals of democracy, that's why we don't have military coups and dictatorships!
While Jinnah was hell bent on religion and separation that's why Pakistan has a weak democratic foundation and is run by army !
Ultimately Nehru was a superior statesman
What a clasyy English style
mountbatten betrayed us,
I recommend the " Book, Freedom of India " written by Abu al kalam Azad..to evaluate the Muslim League and Congress Leaders.
The book is full of untruths. Case in point: Azad states in his book p. 149 that Gandhi convinced other Congressis to accept Azad's plan in 1945. In reality, as Gandhi's letter to Azad (dated 2/8/45) that was intercepted by British shows, Gandhi had asked Azad to shelve his plan as it accepted that Hindu Raj was imminent and Muslims needed safeguards such as parity. In India Wins Freedom Azad produces a sanitized version of his plan.
@@altanigrum6448Are you sure the British are above making things up? Seriously??
where did u get these clips?
These are from "The Life & Times of Lord Mountbatten" a 10 part documentary you can find on RUclips.
Nehru was a good Freemason
Jab bhagwa lehrayega tab hogi asli aazadi. Jai Aryavart 🕉️
🤣🤣🤣
Arey Bagwa dahri China Ladhak aur Doklam lae lia hai
Tanik uha bhi Nazar 🧿 dohri lo
😂😂😂bhagt
Mountbattan was bastard of one order his wife has affair with Nehru and she
had full control over her husband Mohammad Ali Jinnah made no mistake he know the mentally of Hindu and British and Pakistan came on world map Jinnah was the greatest leader than Gandhi and Nehru. Mountbattan says "you can't buy Jinnah" we Pakistani are proud have Jinnah as our leader and thank you Quida-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah for beautiful Pakistan 🇵🇰. Islamabad Pakistan 🇵🇰
Nehru did seem less difficult.....Jinnah looked like he wasn’t have any......
Nehru started the apple polishing as soon as the viceroy arrived!
Absolutely not. Gandhi ji was already the then king of india just needed to be proclaimed. that's why there was no need to flatter anyone. Nehru was trying to be a great friend of Mountbatten. It was jinnah who was apple polishing Mountbatten... pre intended to divide India into pakistan. His status was lesser than nehru and any other statesman of that time. He was just recognised as the muslim league leader and merely a puppet of britishers...that is all. 😂🤢
@@ProfessorY now his grandson Nusli Wadia is doing the same with Americans
@@ProfessorY homie go read some history or something, then we’ll talk
@@ProfessorY are u kidding me? Nehru was sleeping with Edwina... The wife of Lord Mountbatten... Who himself slept with little boys... All documented.
Jinnah was a Saint among these weirdos.
The headline is incorrect. The commentator's talking about Neuru and Gandhi - not Jinnah !!!!
After 1:00 mark Mountbatten talks about Jinnah
Because Belongs to the God's
A lot of love for Jinnah here looks like. Great admirers. Poor knowledge. In his Direct Action, he killed thousands of Indians. Naturally we have to admire him.
you're filled with Congress propaganda! you need to know more than just the rhetoric your establishment filled you with!
Jinah was a British contractor
Yes the divider of country and the divider of people and religion ...
Nothing was divided but rather Pakistan took what was rightfully hers. It's not like there was unity in the beginning. Pakistan ethnically and culturally are different from indians. So cope.
You can't divide something when there's no unity in the first place!
@suraj hamal who the hell are you to talking about quaid e azam tum un ki shoes ki matti bhi nahi ho chalo niklo bade aye wo Indian zameen thi leken kya tum use apne baap ke ghar se laye the wo tumhare baap ki jaagir nahi hai hum Muslims ko tum Indians ke saath nahi rehna to humne tabhi hi india divide ker ke apna hissa lelia
@@starlight6152 do a DNA test
@@iknowyouwontreply1121 You can do the DNA with Bangaldeshis. Majority Muslims stayed to the West which was hisorically proven.
The whole interview?
nehru tu angerazo ka dost tha
Liar.
Quaid e azam zindabad!
This video itself says that Nehru was better than Jinnah.
In bed with viceroys wife. And split Punjab in half and started the Kashmir issue. Jinnah worked his whole life for Hindu Muslims unity and nehru came and was given what was Jinnahs in congress. He saw the islamophobia Hindus and Muslims were treated bad.
@@fatimahashim1743 jaake third party sources se history padho
@@amulyamishra5745 the film on Jinnah was made on actual conversation and made by theirs party watch it
Cuz he danced to the white tunes and licked his soles? Typical Indian ngl
Typical Indian inferiority complex on show here 😂
Keep in mind that "Islam" means "submission". Then look up how many people died because Jinnah wanted the British and Indians to submit to a separate Pakistan.
Islam means submission to God, not to Hindutva fascists
@@altanigrum6448 fascists?? Seems like you are from pakistan. Well for your fact india is opposite what you think of. I'll suggest you to watch keeshu films 1947 partition by gulam rajput there he'll tell how muslim hindu unity was broken by gandhi and nehru. And yes after that video please reply back.
Those died because mobs did not let them go peacefully to their homeland .. they should have been given a safe passage ... The British and Congress leaders should have ensured that !
those that died during partition were due to extremism from mobs of both sides, dont blame it all on jinnah because he wanted to protect the interests of his people
@@MrWildrain Try Wikipedia: "Islam is the verbal noun of Form IV of the root and means "submission" or "total surrender". You must distinguish between Intent and Action. Taliban, Osama Bin-Laden, hate of gays, cruelty, murder and terrorism since Jinna, and subversion of women's liberties and human right to be free of male dominance. It's time for Muslim men to psychologically grow up.
Nehru was betrayed India and Netaji Bose...He is not Hindu..he just make us fool
Jin jin pakistani ko mirchi lag rahi hai aur yaha comments mein Edwina aur Nehru k riste k bare mein bol rahe hai...hai fasaya Nehru ne Edwina kyuki unki aukat thi...tumhara leader Jinnah apne dost 17 saal ki beti k saath ishq ladata tha.
Jinnah said I don't want moth eaten Punjab and Bengal
Hadio ka dhacha Muhammad Ali Jinnah 😂😂😂
@Aqua Gaming koi farq nhi padta mereko
Toh mere koh kausa farak padta hai be
@@alimz9134 cigar ke reason se body nhi utri thi uski 😂😂😂
@@alimz9134 mujhe jo sahi lagta hai na woh mai bolta hu samja
jinnah was an idealist, his predictions are coming true to this very day as the time progresses… hating on someone on the basis of their physical appearance, caste, etc is the most disrespectful thing someone can say.
0:20 yeah and Muslim majority areas of Kashmir, Gurdaspur, Pathankot, Ferozpur and Zira were given to the Hindu majority state of India nice forcing strategies of Nehru and his cabinet
Hindu majority areas existed in sindh too. Whole sindh given to pak
Agr nhi hota batwara to aaj musalman ki abadi 80cr hote or hm Hindu k gulam nhi rhte
When Muslims were living in united India during Congress Raj of 1937 and 1939, their numbers did not help them against Hindu majoritarianism.
@@altanigrum6448 us smay itna Hindu muslim tha bhi nhi wo to jinnah musalman ilaka m har gaya to bhdkane lga or kha ki congress tmhare intrest ko dabayega or waise bhi azadi k baad log desh ko develope krne mai lagte na ki Hindu muslim m or jb Hindu muslim krte tb tk hmari abadi barabri ki hoti batwara nhi hota na to aaj musalman ki abadi 80cr hote or hmare interest ko nhi dabaya jata na hi hme gulam bnate na hi hm pe atyachar krte or aankh utha kr bhi nhi dekhte waise bhi tm sacche musalman ho bhi nhi agr sacche musalman hote na to batwara nhi krate or apne watan se mohabbat karte kyunki apne watan se mohabbat hmare huzzor ki sunnat h fir bhi hmare aka Huzoor ke upar kitne atyachar huye unse jayda to hm log pe hua bhi fir kya unhone batwar karaya nhi na or tm log sale suar khane wale anjeri ganjeri ka baat maan liye jiske wajah se lakhon begunhaon k jaan us shia ko jisko islam se koi lena dena nhi uske liye dua karte ho ki jannat jayega or jinhone ne caha ki batwara na ho taki lakhon logon ka jaan nhi or tm unhe jahannam m jane ki dua mangte ho or waise bhi ne gussa m to Pakistan bna diya mgr mrne se pehle jinna ne kha tha ki maine Pakistan bna k duniya ki sabse badi galti ki hai or waise bhi uska maut bta diya ki glt tha kutte ki maut mra or wakt ne ye bhi bta diya Bangladesh bn ke ki jinnah tm glt the..
Hindu-Muslim violence reached its peak in that decade during Congress Raj. Vidya Mandir scheme, imposition of anti-Muslim Vande Matram as national anthem, music played before mosques, Muslims killed during Id-al-Azha for sacrificing cow all peaked. This started in 1870s with Deccan riots, then 1882 Salem riots, 1888-1893 cow raksha riots. Partition of Bengal saw anti-Muslim sentiments further increase. Congress refused to share any power in 1937-39 and drove Muslim premiers such as Sikandar Hyat and Fazlul Haq (both anti-League) into lap of the League.
Pretending everything was fine is an old mahasabha tactic. I advise against using it. Oh and in case you didn't notice: Bangladesh did not go back into India.
@@altanigrum6448 to kya ho gaya wo kis desh m nhi hota iska mtlb ye thodi na batwara kr de agar batwara nhi hota na to aaj India m hmari hukumat hoti hmara sb kuch na ki hm 20cr rhte aaj 80cr k tadad m hindustan m raaz karte.
@@middleclassmc9202 Wherever this happens the country breaks up. Look at Europe divided into dozens of small states. Ireland which fought a civil war to free themselves. I have already explained to you how Hindu Congress refused to share power in 1937-39 and emboldened Hindutva. Your assertion that we would be ruling India had Partition not happened is baseless.
Mohammed Ali jinnah was the greatest leader ever in the history of this world he created a new country for the oppress and poor people of the sub continent which is called Pakistan. Pureland
Time for a cruise, methinks
Nehru was also your wife's bedroom companion