UPDATE: As of 03/31/2023, the Canon EOS R5 C has attained its Netflix Approval! Crazy to think I posted this video just a couple weeks before it's announcement and asked Canon and Netflix to make it work! Glad it''s here now after almost a year of the release of the R5 C!
Great update, now a bunch of kids who bought the camera by scamming their grandparents for cash, will start making Netflix movies :) :) :) It's ridiculous how pointless things are shared all over internet like a big deal, and that's only because camera gear is way more affordable than their buyers level of skill and experience.
People are always talking about Canon skintones, but it's all the colors, grass, sky, red car, yellow shirt, it always looks the most natural, ony Alexas does it better.
I can see slightly better dynamic range on the fx3, can be seen at the lake comparison at 9:35, in the blown out water area if you put it full screen you will see a bit more water "ridges" in the lower center part close to the grass in the fx3 while exposure seems to be exacly the same, i went for the R5C, i prefered the lowlight performance, out of camara colors and photography options... in the future ill use it for my sports photography and for video will switch to RED or Arri (if you dont want to add weight to your rig or dont want to spend extra $ on battery solutions for the R5C i would go for the fx3)
That is not how you compare DR. Those examples were not the widest DR image both cameras can provide, not even close. Also, Red and Alexa are made for large teams and highend productions, unless that's your plan, there are a bunch of better cameras for solo shooters, the best one is Canon C70. The biggest and the most expensive truck is not good for a race track.
I don't know when exactly you uploaded the video, the R5C is now a Netflix approved Camera, I thought it was always Netflix approved though. Amazing comparison tbh. The form factor of the FX 3 is just soo nice, I can imagine ow good it would feel to have in the hands, but I really love both Cameras and wish I didn't haev to choose between the two, They are just so amazing.
Hello , please im just asking , im a videographer, which better , sony Fx3 or the canon R5c for video , i love to take footage with high quality in the morning and at night espacially
go with FX3 if you need low light capability, it has 12 megapixel and because the pixel size is much bigger in full frame area it is good in low light, in daylight both cameras are good.
Appreciate it! Glad you're liking the FX30! Definitely a great choice! It's hard to do a straightforward vs between the two cameras since even though they're marketed towards similar users, they both feel different in their own ways. For a camera that's solely suited for capturing video and being reliable in it, the FX3 is the camera for it. Whereas the R5 C is like having both a photo and cinema camera in one, it is great for both with plenty of codecs and features to chose from with its 45 MP sensor, but takes quite a bit out of the battery life, less dynamic range in non RAW modes and still has micro HDMI. But the best recommendation I can say is two get either in your hands to try out. Hope it helps!
@@AnishRajah The thing is that with a 1.4 prime and clear image zoom the FX30 is a real alternative. Is a risk free cost effective option to dive into the Sony Ecosystem and for daily stuff. I mean, you can get 3 APSC 1.4 primes for less than $1000 on the used market. Also V60 cards are fine, that is all I use. With the handle you get 4 channel audio plus you get FX3/FX6 exact workflows in case you ever step up or get called to a bigger shoot. Crazy world we live in.
@@jameslama5049 Sure but lenses are lighter, cheaper. Lighting is also way smaller and portable. APSC, is fantastic. You also get more reach. There are tons of fast primes for APSC for $300. Do we really need $2000 lenses to record an event or a wedding?
I think a major flaw personally for the sony is that I use anamorphic lenses quite a bit and it seems that the sony cant record a proper 4.6k resolution that an anamorphic lens needs to not look distorted when you translate the video. but idk, maybe it does, its just an observation
Thanks for watching! I would say the Canon EOS R5 C seemed more natural and color accurate look whereas the Sony FX3 went more magenta, but could be resolved given more time in color correction. Canon typically does a better job with colors straight out of the camera, but Sony has definitely gotten better over the years.
Been reading up on the R5 MK II as well and seems like a solid refresh from the original, but I’d say the R5 C is still a great pick up as it is geared more towards cinematographers with the Cinema OS and great specs for photos whereas the MK II is for photographers with video second in mind, but might be a better hybrid overall. Ultimately depends on what your primary needs are!
@@mbismbismb something I still think about. Because the movies are always perfect in the way they handle focus. Maybe skill issue. I will work on my skills but those cameras are rigged and have many fast dials to do things.
Appreciate the effort you put into this! I haven't used a Sony since the A7III, but i'm not in love with the R5/R5C. It has such odd colors in RAW or Clog3 compared to my C70. The highlight roll off and shadow detail is much worse. I mostly use the R5C as a photo cam haha. I would try the FX3 for my small cam if it had at least 20MP. Oh yeah and the autofocus on the R5C in anything but perfect light is pretty horrible vs the R5, thanks to the cinema OS.
My canon r5 sensor damaged some lines of pixels from laser recording im frustrated Now im lookin for new camera but want to try somthing new mostly for hiend video But r5c looks ugly
Good video but, the idea that lower megapixel sensors take in more light or are better in low light is a well know fallacy and has been debunked numerous times. Also, higher megapixel sensor product a finer grain pattern than lower resolution sensors. That said I’m not wild about the R5C or the FX3. In both cases I feel the previous versions, R5 and A7SIII offer better value.
Not true photo sites are larger and do gather more light. In photos where you shrink it down yes it compensates and noise gets smaller. Either way you can get to a good result using either method. But bigger photo sites to gather more light.
Hmm I always thought lower resolution sensor gather more light because the photosites are bigger over the same area, so they are more sensitive. It's why Sony's a7s/FX3 video centric range of mirrorless has always been lower megapixel. How is this debunked?
@@angryrabbitproductions1690 I looked. One video by DPReview and a dozen websites quoting it. In their video there is obviously slightly more noise in the a7r IV vs the a7s III they compare. But it's stills, and they deduce that for large prints at 100%, the resolution gain is worth it. They then go and do some noise reduction to match them. Watch at 8:40 in the DPReview video. Fact: Larger photo sites absorb more light. It's physics. It's not a myth, it's just in the mix with a lot of other factors at play as well. Including that lower resolution requires less processing power and that can also allow room for other IQ improvements.
![[DOKKAN BATTLE] Worldwide Campaign Announcement Video Part 2!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JpT5Voak6WA/mqdefault.jpg)
UPDATE: As of 03/31/2023, the Canon EOS R5 C has attained its Netflix Approval! Crazy to think I posted this video just a couple weeks before it's announcement and asked Canon and Netflix to make it work! Glad it''s here now after almost a year of the release of the R5 C!
Congrats 👏
Soo for wedding purpose & we are already canon shooter , I already have 1dx mark iii , looking to buy something for the vedio ..!!
Great update, now a bunch of kids who bought the camera by scamming their grandparents for cash, will start making Netflix movies :) :) :) It's ridiculous how pointless things are shared all over internet like a big deal, and that's only because camera gear is way more affordable than their buyers level of skill and experience.
Great comparison! Have to give it to the r5c since is the camera I decided to move in from Sony.
Canon skin tones will never be beaten!!!
Exactly
People are always talking about Canon skintones, but it's all the colors, grass, sky, red car, yellow shirt, it always looks the most natural, ony Alexas does it better.
I can see slightly better dynamic range on the fx3, can be seen at the lake comparison at 9:35, in the blown out water area if you put it full screen you will see a bit more water "ridges" in the lower center part close to the grass in the fx3 while exposure seems to be exacly the same, i went for the R5C, i prefered the lowlight performance, out of camara colors and photography options... in the future ill use it for my sports photography and for video will switch to RED or Arri (if you dont want to add weight to your rig or dont want to spend extra $ on battery solutions for the R5C i would go for the fx3)
That is not how you compare DR. Those examples were not the widest DR image both cameras can provide, not even close. Also, Red and Alexa are made for large teams and highend productions, unless that's your plan, there are a bunch of better cameras for solo shooters, the best one is Canon C70. The biggest and the most expensive truck is not good for a race track.
Does anyone else feel like FX3 is pulling more pink/red than the canon in this video. Like at 7:36
I don't know when exactly you uploaded the video, the R5C is now a Netflix approved Camera, I thought it was always Netflix approved though. Amazing comparison tbh. The form factor of the FX 3 is just soo nice, I can imagine ow good it would feel to have in the hands, but I really love both Cameras and wish I didn't haev to choose between the two, They are just so amazing.
Very impressive compression, keep going❤
I’m also compressed 😂
Hello , please im just asking , im a videographer, which better , sony Fx3 or the canon R5c for video , i love to take footage with high quality in the morning and at night espacially
go with FX3 if you need low light capability, it has 12 megapixel and because the pixel size is much bigger in full frame area it is good in low light, in daylight both cameras are good.
Great video. Thanks bro!
it is posible to vs it does ... great video. BTW I recently picked up the FX30, is so much fun
Appreciate it! Glad you're liking the FX30! Definitely a great choice! It's hard to do a straightforward vs between the two cameras since even though they're marketed towards similar users, they both feel different in their own ways. For a camera that's solely suited for capturing video and being reliable in it, the FX3 is the camera for it. Whereas the R5 C is like having both a photo and cinema camera in one, it is great for both with plenty of codecs and features to chose from with its 45 MP sensor, but takes quite a bit out of the battery life, less dynamic range in non RAW modes and still has micro HDMI. But the best recommendation I can say is two get either in your hands to try out. Hope it helps!
@@AnishRajah The thing is that with a 1.4 prime and clear image zoom the FX30 is a real alternative. Is a risk free cost effective option to dive into the Sony Ecosystem and for daily stuff. I mean, you can get 3 APSC 1.4 primes for less than $1000 on the used market. Also V60 cards are fine, that is all I use. With the handle you get 4 channel audio plus you get FX3/FX6 exact workflows in case you ever step up or get called to a bigger shoot. Crazy world we live in.
@@nyambe fx30 is a real beast and affordable.
FX 30 is crop sensor not full frame . A big difference .
@@jameslama5049 Sure but lenses are lighter, cheaper. Lighting is also way smaller and portable. APSC, is fantastic. You also get more reach. There are tons of fast primes for APSC for $300. Do we really need $2000 lenses to record an event or a wedding?
I think a major flaw personally for the sony is that I use anamorphic lenses quite a bit and it seems that the sony cant record a proper 4.6k resolution that an anamorphic lens needs to not look distorted when you translate the video. but idk, maybe it does, its just an observation
The S5iiX does most of the stuff these do but for half the cost. And has shutter angle and waveforms/vector scopes built in
no.
@@vorjay no what
@@goodgremlinmedia2757 S5iix isn't Netflix approved for one thing. the S1H is though.
Hey Anish, loved the video, which camera is capturing true color of your hoodie as its looking different shades on both the cameras.....
Thanks for watching! I would say the Canon EOS R5 C seemed more natural and color accurate look whereas the Sony FX3 went more magenta, but could be resolved given more time in color correction. Canon typically does a better job with colors straight out of the camera, but Sony has definitely gotten better over the years.
@@AnishRajah Thanks Anish🙏
Can you use the USB C on the canon r5 C to shoot directly on an external hard drive (NVMe ssd)??
No
With CLog2 supposedly coming to the R5 MK II in May, how does the R5c compare with the new R5 MK II? Is it still worth buying the R5C?
Been reading up on the R5 MK II as well and seems like a solid refresh from the original, but I’d say the R5 C is still a great pick up as it is geared more towards cinematographers with the Cinema OS and great specs for photos whereas the MK II is for photographers with video second in mind, but might be a better hybrid overall. Ultimately depends on what your primary needs are!
R5C has so much sharper and cleaner look, nice comparisson
u really have to consult doctor to check ur eyes brother FX3 is cine cam
@@RaghavSharma-kj9goand the R5C as well.
@@RaghavSharma-kj9goyou mad bro?
@@RaghavSharma-kj9go you need to check your anger "bro" relax.. they are just cameras 😂
@@RaghavSharma-kj9go bruh my does your comment smell like curry ?
5:29 you compare out focus scene on fx3 with infocus r5c?
I'm shocked how bad the Sony looks in comparison.
no need...cause those sony fanboys on youtube already graded the sony footage so that it looks better for viewers hahhaha
@@mbismbismbhahaha. I am canon guy but I envy Sony auto focus and low light performance. Otherwise here the R5C is destroying that fx3.
@@boxoffisa i wonder why many cinematographer like manual focus than AF
@@mbismbismb something I still think about. Because the movies are always perfect in the way they handle focus. Maybe skill issue. I will work on my skills but those cameras are rigged and have many fast dials to do things.
@@mbismbismb you sound dumb asl💀
i love the electronic viewfinder
You started with R5C on the left and then switched it halfway through, was a bit confusing but otherwise awesome video!
Wow, the Canon R5C clarity is GOAT. What lense did you used here? 5:56
Everything on the R5 C was shot with the RF 15-35 F2.8!
@@AnishRajah Thanks
Appreciate the effort you put into this! I haven't used a Sony since the A7III, but i'm not in love with the R5/R5C. It has such odd colors in RAW or Clog3 compared to my C70. The highlight roll off and shadow detail is much worse. I mostly use the R5C as a photo cam haha. I would try the FX3 for my small cam if it had at least 20MP. Oh yeah and the autofocus on the R5C in anything but perfect light is pretty horrible vs the R5, thanks to the cinema OS.
So... Can i shoot the whole movie in canon r5c in 4k for Netflix ..? Or it should be around 8k only?
4k
Hi, we'd like to collaborate with you. How can we get in touch with you?
Canon R5c 4K 120 FPS, when come to post proses can make it 240FPS ?
My canon r5 sensor damaged some lines of pixels from laser recording im frustrated
Now im lookin for new camera but want to try somthing new mostly for hiend video
But r5c looks ugly
canon looks better than the sony FX coffin bodies hahaha
It actually is netflix approved
Very good video
the R5C colours are so much better...what da heck that red tint on sony's footage...the tree trunk is red
The r5c has clog2
dannng the sony lens is HUGEEE , more huge that Canon's RF... nvm sony fanboys would argue that sony lens is smaller than canon's hahaha
8K 60, nuf said
The Sony is the obvious choice here
Negative...You get much more camera with the R5c
How is it obvious? In what part of the video can you refer to where its the “obvious” choice?
@@Justhitupdman dynamic range, autofocus, weight, battery life. Come in, it’s not close
@@Yupthereitism 8k, Raw video, Cinema camera assist tools, also a premium photo camera, better colors. You're right it's not even close.
his sonyfanboy brain told him so hahhaha...@@Justhitupdman
Good video but, the idea that lower megapixel sensors take in more light or are better in low light is a well know fallacy and has been debunked numerous times. Also, higher megapixel sensor product a finer grain pattern than lower resolution sensors.
That said I’m not wild about the R5C or the FX3. In both cases I feel the previous versions, R5 and A7SIII offer better value.
Not true photo sites are larger and do gather more light. In photos where you shrink it down yes it compensates and noise gets smaller. Either way you can get to a good result using either method. But bigger photo sites to gather more light.
Hmm I always thought lower resolution sensor gather more light because the photosites are bigger over the same area, so they are more sensitive. It's why Sony's a7s/FX3 video centric range of mirrorless has always been lower megapixel. How is this debunked?
@@jmasked5082 Google "lower megapixels better low light"... there are multiple articles out there. It's a very common misconception.
@@angryrabbitproductions1690 I looked. One video by DPReview and a dozen websites quoting it. In their video there is obviously slightly more noise in the a7r IV vs the a7s III they compare. But it's stills, and they deduce that for large prints at 100%, the resolution gain is worth it. They then go and do some noise reduction to match them. Watch at 8:40 in the DPReview video.
Fact: Larger photo sites absorb more light. It's physics. It's not a myth, it's just in the mix with a lot of other factors at play as well. Including that lower resolution requires less processing power and that can also allow room for other IQ improvements.
@@jmasked5082 ruclips.net/video/S02BHmWPZNs/видео.html
4799, 4599, 4399 currently 3799 at this time of writing
The r5c has clog2