One of the 6 Scientists on that list he showed, Dr Kurt Wise, has an (now older) 2 hour video that has much more information on this. It is a great video to watch for more details.
@teldinstarstorm It is a great video. I listed in in the description of the video, but thank you for listing it here as well. It is a great video for people who want to see the model in more detail or for people who enjoy the technical terminology.
Great video well done. I do have a question or maybe an observation about the heat problem. If the oceanic plants sink really quickly and they are cooler than the rest of the mantle would they not have also served as a kind of a barrier against the explosive heat problem that you were referring to. Just a thought. Because they are still there.
@Proverbs252GloryOfKings Thank you. That is a good thought, but the heat problem comes from the direct contact with the hot magma rising from the mantle at spreading ridges. The magma is what would be heating up the oceans. Sinking plates could possibly cool the mantle some (I am not sure though) but I don't think it would solve the issue of hot oceans. Good idea though.
God is very, very merciful and loving. There is hope for everyone who cries out to God with great humility and begs and pleads with Him that if possible, he too may become saved.
Keep up the good work! Not sure how it plays into things, but I have read that scientists have discovered that there exists 2-3 time more water below the earth's surface than on it. Keeping in mind, it has been estimated if you flattened the mountains and filled the trenches (made the land a perfectly smooth ball), there would be 2 MILES of water covering every inch of the Earth! That 2 miles doesn't include the water (2-3 times the amount) below the surface!
While I can appreciate the work put into both this video and the research that it stems from, I do find a few holes in this idea. 1: As with all young earth creation ideals, this model doesn’t account for dating in what I, and many scientists across multiple disciplines, deem correct. This model supports the idea that the sea floor rocks would be created within the 40 day period of the flood. Radiometric dating of the ocean floor shows that the rocks closer to the spreading center are much younger than the rocks found farther away (by about 150 million years). If you don’t like radiometric dating, you can look at sediment buildup. Sediment is found in larger quantities away from the spreading epicenter. Which matches our current models of sedimentation rates and supports the idea that these rocks are much older than those found at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. 2: This model doesn’t give enough time for guyots to form, erode and sink deeper into the earth. These are undersea, volcanic mountains with flat tops eroded by wave action and development of coral reefs. If this model is correct, it would mean the amount of water rushing over this mountain would erode away millions of years worth of rock on the matter of days, while also leaving it flat only on the top. Why didn’t it erode the whole thing? 3: This model would also show a large amount of carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide being put out into our atmosphere. Even if the jets propelled the gases in question into space, Earth’s gravity would have brought them back down to earth. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and the amount of it released by these jets would be enough to cook all life on Earth with the resulting greenhouse effect. Not to mention, sulphur dioxide and water have an exothermic reaction. This reaction would’ve given off a tremendous amount of heat, thus creating an even more hostile environment on Earth. We’re talking a greenhouse effect to end all greenhouse effects. There’s no evidence found on Earth that this happened in such a quick time span. Surely, if this model is correct, there would be no life on Earth aquatic or terrestrial. Noah and his family would have been steamed alive. 4: I can’t talk about young earth without bringing up dinosaurs. Surely a catastrophic event like this would have destroyed countless animal lives. We find trace fossils of dinosaurs along with the bodies of those organisms buried in the same layers of rock. Trace fossils suggesting these animals were likely acting in normal behavior. However, an event of this magnitude would have animals today acting in bizarre ways, perhaps fleeing to high grounds, running for cover, etc. yet we have evidence to suggest these creatures did not act in a typical panicked manner. There are other reasons to refute this model but they dip into areas outside my expertise. I think this model is a good start at a potential scientific theory but it needs to fill in the holes before it can stay afloat.
I think radiometric dating isn't even scientific, we lack the ability to confirm the sources of radioactivity remain constant so in a sense we have no control. Perhaps guyots formed after the flood and were flattened by moving icebergs in the future? and when they melted the sea level rose. I think you are assuming the fountains of the deep are volcanic in nature when they do not have to be. I don't know how to look into this,.. but I have been puzzled by the expanding earth hypothesis. It seems the best thing going with the expanding earth is that all the continents form a sphere. So when I think about what might cause the earth to grow? I am reminded of an experiment on the ISS where they inject air into a spinning sphere of water and the air bubble forms in the center. What could do this to the earth? I really don't know, could an ice comet travel into the earths core? would it be possible for the steam to reduce the friction of the comet.. then this thing is embedded inside the center of the earth and it begins to melt and vaporize, slowly expanding the earth. If something like that happened, some of the water could bust out with all that pressure? and it could spin up the magnetic core causing the alternating polarity of the earth. When something wobbles in low gravity it tends to flip rapidly. This rolls into another thing you brought up that "tremendous heat". If the earth began to expand any heating in the atmosphere could be countered by the decompression of the atmosphere. I can't bring up evolution and the meaninglessness of consensus while an appeal to popularity and an appeal to authority do not automatically combine to no longer be a fallacy in the strength of an argument. Dinosaurs are very interesting, I remember being out in the mid west pulling into random dig sites and seeing their prints in the ground with my own eyes, it was really something. According to the fossil record , you have the three periods of the Mesozoic Era when all dinosaurs lived, right? And before ALL of them lived (supposedly) there were these very odd animals called Horseshoe Crabs. Would you believe me if I told you I have a pet dinosaur? Why not? What if I told you one time I was very nice, walking down a beach, I saw a Horseshoe Crab totally unchanged since before the existence of ALL dinosaurs?? wow.. that is technically more crazy than me having a pet dinosaur.. Now I do have chickens but I'm not buying that Chickens are dinosaurs because they share anatomical similarities while the the horseshoe crab is the proverbial middle finger to Darwin and all his faithful companions. Why is it a problem that dinosaurs were near their young or had food in their belly, or in the middle of swallowing something, when they get buried? You weren't there. When Pompeii was buried by Mount Vesuvius should we discount that it was a cataclysm because people were in the middle of their daily lives? Maybe they didn't think much of the warning earthquakes because they felt them all the time? Perhaps dinosaurs weren't fazed by the water because rain wasn't new? And what begins as a simple rain next thing they know, there is a 500mph tsunami that comes out of nowhere turns the bays into a wall of mud that crushes them in a moment like an ant under a steamroller.
@levigambill801 Thanks for the comment. Great points! 1. This video was attempting more to explore the geophysics of a global flood. The main question being, "Is this even possible." Physically, it seems it is possible. This doesn't prove it did, but it does give it some support. As for radiometric dating, I do not disagree with the science per say, just the interpretation of the data. I think it has been successfully shown that there are many discordances with radiometric dating, especially when tested on rocks of known ages (rocks deposited within the last two hundred years, for example). There has also been many discordances shown between different radiometric dating methods. Many times, if a calculated age does not match the given interpretation of the rocks or fossil in question, contamination is suggested or that data is considered an outlier. I have a dedicated video to this which shows that it is often the interpretation of the scientist that affects data, rather than the data affecting the interpretation. As for sedimentation rates, the increasing thickness of sea floor sediment isn't incompatible with this model. From what I have seen, sea floor sediment is actually thinner than what we would expect if long time scales are applied. If you have more reading on this, I would love to know more. 2. This model would provide plenty of volcanism for sea mounts to form during the flood (1 full year, not 40 days) Subsequently sinking ocean floors, as the model suggests, would allow the tops to be truncated at sea level by wave action. It has been shown that wave action can easily erode freshly deposited basalt and other deposited rocks (See the Island of Surtsey for an example). The carbonate cap of the guyots has also been recently suggested to not be reef formed. Recent drillings have shown that many of the caps have sparse reef remnants. The model would overall suggest the uplift of the sea level during the flood, volcanism for the formation of the sea mount, cooling and sinking ocean floor to allow sea level to subside, and erosion of the sea mount. Flood runoff would've affected more continental structures I think. Guyots are formed out in the ocean, where the flood waters were returning rather than flattening sediments already deposited. Perhaps it planed some flat, but I think the already given answer suffices. 3. Do you know of a resource that tries to quantify the amount of volatiles output by this volcanism? That's an honest question. I can't seem to find one at the moment. I will continue to look. However, carbon dioxide has been known to be higher in our atmosphere at times, even by long time scales. This resulted in plentiful plant growth, not a cooked earth. Regardless, this model also suggests that many particulates and ash output by the flood would've reflected much of the suns rays back into space, cooling a now warmer atmosphere and ocean. This woud've resulted in plentiful precipitation, often in the form of snow (warm ocean leads to more evaporation, colder temps results in lots of snow). An ice age within the few hundred years after the flood has been suggested. This may reduce much of the heat you're suggesting. As for sulfur dioxide, creationists have suggested it was a source of sulfuric acid which assisted in the formation and carving out of many caves at this time. It is possible that plentiful sources of lime and carbonate at this time would've assisted in nullifying this reaction you're suggesting as well. Again, further reading would assist in my response. 4. I have often seen the opposite. We often find plentiful dinosaur trackways and trace fossils in layers beneath where dinosaurs themselves are found. Trackways and trace fossils would also suggest they were buried quickly. Such fossils are easily destroyed by rainfall, wave action, and bioturbation, especially if these were left in sand or mud. Their preservation suggests a quick burial. This all has been interpreted as dinosaurs traveling over wet sediment, perhaps fleeing, and rapid deposition preserving these fossils. Eventually, the rising flood waters and continued deposition dooms the dinosaur as well, rapidly burying it and preserving as a fossil. If it was going about normal behavior, I doubt much evidence would've been preserved over vast amounts of time when such fossils are easily destroyed. Flood geologists and paleontologists look at the same evidence other scientists do, they just interpret it differently. They think the evidence suggests a more rapid and watery deposition rather than gradual deposition. Again, if you have any suggested resources to read, I would gladly read them. Thanks again for a great response and let me know your thoughts on my reply.
It would be good to discuss things honestly until the end, but - Joshua - it doesn't seem to work. As soon as your feelers give a signal that you are in danger of losing the game, you withdraw from the discussion using some excuse. It is understandable that a public discussion in the comments is not suitable for a content creator to lose. It is always better to end in check than to end in checkmate. That is where you quickly lose face.
@@MR-ub6sq I’m a little confused what you are referencing? You commented on this video (a model for the flood) but you mention comments and losing face? What are you referencing here?
@@MR-ub6sq Again, you’re commenting on a video without actually referencing any of the content in said video. Then you refer, in extremely vague terms, to…what? Do you have an example(s)?
@@thegeologian You yourself have been my example before and you are now. It has nothing to do with this video except that this video is also your publication. You are obscuring the point by dwelling on the irrelevant. Have you been diagnosed with AS or do you just want to play the innocent Christian?
@ It just seems odd for you to refer to these vague comments that you’re supposedly accusing me of instead of just actually replying to these comments so I could see what you’re referring to? You chose not too and chose not to comment about the content of this video or any others I’ve published. So far, this just seems like trolling. So, unless you’d like to discuss any of the above things, I think I’ll just wish you a good day.
Jesus Christ referenced the flood in the New Testament. What else do I need to know about the global flood: nothing.- - - If you are unwilling to believe in the Creator of Everything; God the Father and His Son; Jesus then you are doomed to be deceived into believing in evolution and ETs (aliens) as our progenitors…. God help us all not to fall victim to this “great deception” in the name of Jesus, Amen! (Psalm 14:1 KJV, Matthew 24:24 KJV, 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 KJV and to avoid deception John 3:16 KJV)
Joshua, you made an outstanding video! We need more warriors like you! I am in pain every day for all those that refuse the gift of the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ's sacrifice He made for all of us. May God bless you, I ask in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.
We are in the final stretch. 10k is the consummation of God. From creation to the day Our Lord Jesus Christ gave His life, was 7k years. “But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”We are in the third and final millennium after Christ. In the 3k year and on the third day, which falls on Friday, is the rapture and resurrection, then there are 6 months of hell for those left behind. Are you ready for the rapture?... "90% of people will reject this message: 'Their souls fear the final judgment.' Romans 7:24 "O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So, I myself serve God's law with my mind; but with the flesh, the law of sin"...
Estamos en la recta final. 10k es la consumación de Dios. Desde la creación hasta el día en que Nuestro Señor Jesucristo dio Su vida, fueron 7k años. "Pero, amados, no olvidéis una sola cosa: que para el Señor un día es como mil años, y mil años como un día." Estamos en el tercer y último milenio después de Cristo. En el año 3k y en el tercer día, que cae en viernes, es el rapto y la resurrección, entonces hay 6 meses de infierno para los que quedan atrás. ¿Estás listo para el rapto?... "El 90% de las personas rechazarán este mensaje: 'Sus almas temen el juicio final'. Romanos 7:24 "¡Miserable de mí! ¿Quién me librará de este cuerpo de muerte? Doy gracias a Dios por Jesucristo nuestro Señor. Por lo tanto, yo mismo sirvo a la ley de Dios con mi mente; pero con la carne, la ley del pecado"...
One of the 6 Scientists on that list he showed, Dr Kurt Wise, has an (now older) 2 hour video that has much more information on this. It is a great video to watch for more details.
@teldinstarstorm It is a great video. I listed in in the description of the video, but thank you for listing it here as well. It is a great video for people who want to see the model in more detail or for people who enjoy the technical terminology.
Great video well done. I do have a question or maybe an observation about the heat problem. If the oceanic plants sink really quickly and they are cooler than the rest of the mantle would they not have also served as a kind of a barrier against the explosive heat problem that you were referring to. Just a thought. Because they are still there.
@Proverbs252GloryOfKings Thank you.
That is a good thought, but the heat problem comes from the direct contact with the hot magma rising from the mantle at spreading ridges. The magma is what would be heating up the oceans. Sinking plates could possibly cool the mantle some (I am not sure though) but I don't think it would solve the issue of hot oceans. Good idea though.
•Diehold Foundation
•Suspicious Observers
•Lost History Channel- The Squatterman Project
God is very, very merciful and loving. There is hope for everyone who cries out to God with great humility and begs and pleads with Him that if possible, he too may become saved.
Is this the same as hydroplate theory just with a different name?
Keep up the good work! Not sure how it plays into things, but I have read that scientists have discovered that there exists 2-3 time more water below the earth's surface than on it. Keeping in mind, it has been estimated if you flattened the mountains and filled the trenches (made the land a perfectly smooth ball), there would be 2 MILES of water covering every inch of the Earth! That 2 miles doesn't include the water (2-3 times the amount) below the surface!
While I can appreciate the work put into both this video and the research that it stems from, I do find a few holes in this idea.
1: As with all young earth creation ideals, this model doesn’t account for dating in what I, and many scientists across multiple disciplines, deem correct. This model supports the idea that the sea floor rocks would be created within the 40 day period of the flood. Radiometric dating of the ocean floor shows that the rocks closer to the spreading center are much younger than the rocks found farther away (by about 150 million years). If you don’t like radiometric dating, you can look at sediment buildup. Sediment is found in larger quantities away from the spreading epicenter. Which matches our current models of sedimentation rates and supports the idea that these rocks are much older than those found at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
2: This model doesn’t give enough time for guyots to form, erode and sink deeper into the earth. These are undersea, volcanic mountains with flat tops eroded by wave action and development of coral reefs. If this model is correct, it would mean the amount of water rushing over this mountain would erode away millions of years worth of rock on the matter of days, while also leaving it flat only on the top. Why didn’t it erode the whole thing?
3: This model would also show a large amount of carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide being put out into our atmosphere. Even if the jets propelled the gases in question into space, Earth’s gravity would have brought them back down to earth. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and the amount of it released by these jets would be enough to cook all life on Earth with the resulting greenhouse effect. Not to mention, sulphur dioxide and water have an exothermic reaction. This reaction would’ve given off a tremendous amount of heat, thus creating an even more hostile environment on Earth. We’re talking a greenhouse effect to end all greenhouse effects. There’s no evidence found on Earth that this happened in such a quick time span. Surely, if this model is correct, there would be no life on Earth aquatic or terrestrial. Noah and his family would have been steamed alive.
4: I can’t talk about young earth without bringing up dinosaurs. Surely a catastrophic event like this would have destroyed countless animal lives. We find trace fossils of dinosaurs along with the bodies of those organisms buried in the same layers of rock. Trace fossils suggesting these animals were likely acting in normal behavior. However, an event of this magnitude would have animals today acting in bizarre ways, perhaps fleeing to high grounds, running for cover, etc. yet we have evidence to suggest these creatures did not act in a typical panicked manner.
There are other reasons to refute this model but they dip into areas outside my expertise. I think this model is a good start at a potential scientific theory but it needs to fill in the holes before it can stay afloat.
Good constructive criticism. You do not see that much in people with other viewpoints. Thank you for sharing this information.
I think radiometric dating isn't even scientific, we lack the ability to confirm the sources of radioactivity remain constant so in a sense we have no control.
Perhaps guyots formed after the flood and were flattened by moving icebergs in the future? and when they melted the sea level rose.
I think you are assuming the fountains of the deep are volcanic in nature when they do not have to be.
I don't know how to look into this,.. but I have been puzzled by the expanding earth hypothesis. It seems the best thing going with the expanding earth is that all the continents form a sphere. So when I think about what might cause the earth to grow? I am reminded of an experiment on the ISS where they inject air into a spinning sphere of water and the air bubble forms in the center.
What could do this to the earth? I really don't know, could an ice comet travel into the earths core? would it be possible for the steam to reduce the friction of the comet.. then this thing is embedded inside the center of the earth and it begins to melt and vaporize, slowly expanding the earth. If something like that happened, some of the water could bust out with all that pressure? and it could spin up the magnetic core causing the alternating polarity of the earth. When something wobbles in low gravity it tends to flip rapidly.
This rolls into another thing you brought up that "tremendous heat". If the earth began to expand any heating in the atmosphere could be countered by the decompression of the atmosphere.
I can't bring up evolution and the meaninglessness of consensus while an appeal to popularity and an appeal to authority do not automatically combine to no longer be a fallacy in the strength of an argument. Dinosaurs are very interesting, I remember being out in the mid west pulling into random dig sites and seeing their prints in the ground with my own eyes, it was really something.
According to the fossil record , you have the three periods of the Mesozoic Era when all dinosaurs lived, right? And before ALL of them lived (supposedly) there were these very odd animals called Horseshoe Crabs.
Would you believe me if I told you I have a pet dinosaur? Why not? What if I told you one time I was very nice, walking down a beach, I saw a Horseshoe Crab totally unchanged since before the existence of ALL dinosaurs?? wow.. that is technically more crazy than me having a pet dinosaur.. Now I do have chickens but I'm not buying that Chickens are dinosaurs because they share anatomical similarities while the the horseshoe crab is the proverbial middle finger to Darwin and all his faithful companions.
Why is it a problem that dinosaurs were near their young or had food in their belly, or in the middle of swallowing something, when they get buried? You weren't there. When Pompeii was buried by Mount Vesuvius should we discount that it was a cataclysm because people were in the middle of their daily lives? Maybe they didn't think much of the warning earthquakes because they felt them all the time?
Perhaps dinosaurs weren't fazed by the water because rain wasn't new? And what begins as a simple rain next thing they know, there is a 500mph tsunami that comes out of nowhere turns the bays into a wall of mud that crushes them in a moment like an ant under a steamroller.
@levigambill801 Thanks for the comment. Great points!
1. This video was attempting more to explore the geophysics of a global flood. The main question being, "Is this even possible." Physically, it seems it is possible. This doesn't prove it did, but it does give it some support. As for radiometric dating, I do not disagree with the science per say, just the interpretation of the data. I think it has been successfully shown that there are many discordances with radiometric dating, especially when tested on rocks of known ages (rocks deposited within the last two hundred years, for example). There has also been many discordances shown between different radiometric dating methods. Many times, if a calculated age does not match the given interpretation of the rocks or fossil in question, contamination is suggested or that data is considered an outlier. I have a dedicated video to this which shows that it is often the interpretation of the scientist that affects data, rather than the data affecting the interpretation. As for sedimentation rates, the increasing thickness of sea floor sediment isn't incompatible with this model. From what I have seen, sea floor sediment is actually thinner than what we would expect if long time scales are applied. If you have more reading on this, I would love to know more.
2. This model would provide plenty of volcanism for sea mounts to form during the flood (1 full year, not 40 days) Subsequently sinking ocean floors, as the model suggests, would allow the tops to be truncated at sea level by wave action. It has been shown that wave action can easily erode freshly deposited basalt and other deposited rocks (See the Island of Surtsey for an example). The carbonate cap of the guyots has also been recently suggested to not be reef formed. Recent drillings have shown that many of the caps have sparse reef remnants. The model would overall suggest the uplift of the sea level during the flood, volcanism for the formation of the sea mount, cooling and sinking ocean floor to allow sea level to subside, and erosion of the sea mount. Flood runoff would've affected more continental structures I think. Guyots are formed out in the ocean, where the flood waters were returning rather than flattening sediments already deposited. Perhaps it planed some flat, but I think the already given answer suffices.
3. Do you know of a resource that tries to quantify the amount of volatiles output by this volcanism? That's an honest question. I can't seem to find one at the moment. I will continue to look. However, carbon dioxide has been known to be higher in our atmosphere at times, even by long time scales. This resulted in plentiful plant growth, not a cooked earth. Regardless, this model also suggests that many particulates and ash output by the flood would've reflected much of the suns rays back into space, cooling a now warmer atmosphere and ocean. This woud've resulted in plentiful precipitation, often in the form of snow (warm ocean leads to more evaporation, colder temps results in lots of snow). An ice age within the few hundred years after the flood has been suggested. This may reduce much of the heat you're suggesting. As for sulfur dioxide, creationists have suggested it was a source of sulfuric acid which assisted in the formation and carving out of many caves at this time. It is possible that plentiful sources of lime and carbonate at this time would've assisted in nullifying this reaction you're suggesting as well. Again, further reading would assist in my response.
4. I have often seen the opposite. We often find plentiful dinosaur trackways and trace fossils in layers beneath where dinosaurs themselves are found. Trackways and trace fossils would also suggest they were buried quickly. Such fossils are easily destroyed by rainfall, wave action, and bioturbation, especially if these were left in sand or mud. Their preservation suggests a quick burial. This all has been interpreted as dinosaurs traveling over wet sediment, perhaps fleeing, and rapid deposition preserving these fossils. Eventually, the rising flood waters and continued deposition dooms the dinosaur as well, rapidly burying it and preserving as a fossil. If it was going about normal behavior, I doubt much evidence would've been preserved over vast amounts of time when such fossils are easily destroyed.
Flood geologists and paleontologists look at the same evidence other scientists do, they just interpret it differently. They think the evidence suggests a more rapid and watery deposition rather than gradual deposition. Again, if you have any suggested resources to read, I would gladly read them. Thanks again for a great response and let me know your thoughts on my reply.
It would be good to discuss things honestly until the end, but - Joshua - it doesn't seem to work. As soon as your feelers give a signal that you are in danger of losing the game, you withdraw from the discussion using some excuse. It is understandable that a public discussion in the comments is not suitable for a content creator to lose. It is always better to end in check than to end in checkmate. That is where you quickly lose face.
@@MR-ub6sq I’m a little confused what you are referencing? You commented on this video (a model for the flood) but you mention comments and losing face? What are you referencing here?
@@thegeologian Yeah. Feel free to act surprised and try to give possible others the impression that incomprehensible things are happening here.
@@MR-ub6sq Again, you’re commenting on a video without actually referencing any of the content in said video. Then you refer, in extremely vague terms, to…what? Do you have an example(s)?
@@thegeologian You yourself have been my example before and you are now. It has nothing to do with this video except that this video is also your publication. You are obscuring the point by dwelling on the irrelevant. Have you been diagnosed with AS or do you just want to play the innocent Christian?
@ It just seems odd for you to refer to these vague comments that you’re supposedly accusing me of instead of just actually replying to these comments so I could see what you’re referring to? You chose not too and chose not to comment about the content of this video or any others I’ve published. So far, this just seems like trolling. So, unless you’d like to discuss any of the above things, I think I’ll just wish you a good day.
Jesus Christ referenced the flood in the New Testament. What else do I need to know about the global flood: nothing.- - - If you are unwilling to believe in the Creator of Everything; God the Father and His Son; Jesus then you are doomed to be deceived into believing in evolution and ETs (aliens) as our progenitors…. God help us all not to fall victim to this “great deception” in the name of Jesus, Amen! (Psalm 14:1 KJV, Matthew 24:24 KJV, 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 KJV and to avoid deception John 3:16 KJV)
Joshua, you made an outstanding video! We need more warriors like you! I am in pain every day for
all those that refuse the gift of the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ's sacrifice He made for all of us. May God bless you, I ask in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.
We are in the final stretch. 10k is the consummation of God. From creation to the day Our Lord Jesus Christ gave His life, was 7k years. “But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”We are in the third and final millennium after Christ. In the 3k year and on the third day, which falls on Friday, is the rapture and resurrection, then there are 6 months of hell for those left behind. Are you ready for the rapture?... "90% of people will reject this message: 'Their souls fear the final judgment.' Romans 7:24 "O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So, I myself serve God's law with my mind; but with the flesh, the law of sin"...
Estamos en la recta final. 10k es la consumación de Dios. Desde la creación hasta el día en que Nuestro Señor Jesucristo dio Su vida, fueron 7k años. "Pero, amados, no olvidéis una sola cosa: que para el Señor un día es como mil años, y mil años como un día." Estamos en el tercer y último milenio después de Cristo. En el año 3k y en el tercer día, que cae en viernes, es el rapto y la resurrección, entonces hay 6 meses de infierno para los que quedan atrás. ¿Estás listo para el rapto?... "El 90% de las personas rechazarán este mensaje: 'Sus almas temen el juicio final'. Romanos 7:24 "¡Miserable de mí! ¿Quién me librará de este cuerpo de muerte? Doy gracias a Dios por Jesucristo nuestro Señor. Por lo tanto, yo mismo sirvo a la ley de Dios con mi mente; pero con la carne, la ley del pecado"...