Overall the RED takes the wins, but the fact the iPhone can even compete slightly is gnarly. I've heard "28 Years Later" just finished principal photography and it was shot on iPhone 15 Pro Max - definitely need to watch it when it comes out. In my opinion, the results speak for themselves. Steven Spielberg once said: "You shouldn't dream your film, you should make it", if you couldn't before now you can.
Slightly? thats a bit of an understatement. It can compete, even though a RED is best for cinematic, the iPhone sure could compete and in some situations it was even better. With a professional rig, accessories and post work, you can make great cinematic shots with it. and still, its just a phone with small lens, small sensor.
Can't wait to see this. LOVE RED cameras - the RED Komodo is one of my absolute favourites :) Just finished watching the new mountain biking film on Red Bull TV and it was shot on RED cameras :) :) :)
Great video! Quick tip: When you jump for vertical height, try to stop rather than continuing to move forward. Stop and swing your arms back and then upwards with your body as you jump up. This way your height isn't stolen by the horizontal momentum.
I know nothing about photography 🙂↕️ great video. I just bought the iPhone 16pro and it’s great to see its capabilities and what people who have better equipment have to say!
@@ItsTomRich It looked like and I was not sure about it, thanks for letting me know, do you think the color can be a little bit better for iPhone after color grading, ofc it can't achieve the color profile of red though
We live in a time when we compare phones to professional cameras.... it's insane what these phones can do. Director Danny Boyle used iPhone 15 Pro to shot incoming 28 Years Later movie. It's a proof that all you need is an good idea and creativity. Technicality doesn't matter that much anymore. We already have cheap technology on our hands.
would have been good to compare the phone with a lens on the Komodo that didn't have so much chromatic aberration. The depth of field on the Komodo was definitely nice, the lens was very soft though.
Comparisons like these only add to the confidence why we decided to go the route of the Lumix GH5II, or any of the newer GH series models. Paired with an Atomos Ninja V and a cache of Cinema lenses like the Zeiss CP.2’s, the world is just more open. It even afforded us multiple cameras for B and C cams… Camera like the Komodo are just too cumbersome, which is why we even got rid of Blackmagic cameras too. The cost benefits were just not worth it in our opinion, for the pice of a Komodo, we could get entire sets of Cinema Glass, or at least a couple pairs of top quality glass… Ultimately the end results are nearly indistinguishable… 🤔
why everyone talks about camera while display doesn't support 4k, good HDR images. for example my 12promax display doesn't show exact quality picture taken my 14promax or 16 pro max. same picture has different display on iphone itself. we need good quality display while having great cameras. our family has variety levels of iphones, each one phone display shows different quality in image
I have the 12 pro max but I’m looking at the 16 pro max studio mics but my carrier says that they’ll give me free air pods pro 2 with iPhone 15 pro max so I’m torn if I should save money and get free AirPods or just go with the 16 pro max because I waited for so long 😮
when you compare 1500$ to 10000$ there is a winner other then that you cannot really replace the physical camera but more people will access to great cameras via smartphones then old days when you want an great camera you need a physical one which is expensive
the iphone slowmo image is better, but the compression and bokeh of the lens on the red helps it look professional. use a mirrorless camera with better slowmo would wipe the red and iphone. red is overrated, what saves it is the high dynamic range.
YA're Wrong ❗️ Even Previous Generations i-Phone's 1080p １２０FPS Slo-Mo is As Good As That of Sony Mirrorless ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Only Reason that Mirrorless Slo-Mo Looks Nice is Because The Background Image is Blur out and Only Focused Image Stands out, Overall Image Data Can Save and It Deters Compression Artefacts to Generate out of Lack of Image Transfer Transaction. But When YA Need Deep DOF Motion Picture and Everything Should be Crispy in Focus, Even Sony Most High-End Mirrorless Can Struggle Because Their Data Bit NormaLly Can Not Exceed ４００Mbps. On The Other Hand i-Phone 16 Pro/Pro Max Record ４K １２０FPS ProRes Log Shooting with SSD ATTACHED that Enables Over １,０００Mbps Shooting Video. ruclips.net/video/d1_QWs0llFc/видео.html
Red is not overrated. You have to get a Sony a9iii to get a global shutter which is more expensive than the red, and the red has better colours and compression format than the Sony
If someone compares iPhone with professional camera it means you don’t know anything about videography. . I have the iphone 15 pro max and I can’t compare it with a $15000 sony camera
The iPhone is slightly sharper in most of the shots. Overall, the color is often better. As someone who shot Tv commercials way back in the 1970s, I can tell you that the weight of the rig might help for a short time when beginning a shoot. It quickly becomes tiring and hand arm shake takes over. If a higher quality version of the codec on the iPhone was used, there would have been a difference. The past couple of iPhones have the capability of looking very cinematic if handled properly. You really need a tiny external SSD to shoot the higher quality codec. But that’s not really a big problem. I’m finding the 16 Pro Max that its a slightly bit better than the 15 Pro Max. The main problem is, obviously, that the smaller chip has a lot more depth of field. But the chips inside keep getting larger and the main camera sensor is now almost a 1” sensor. There are a few pretty good lenses for smartphones and each generation gets better. If somehow Apple made it possible to remove the lens and replace it with full lenses, it would be amazing.
nah the 10k camera is better in everyshot it has way more detail and less noise . the sharpening your talking about maybe just the artificial sharpening by iphone but its not as accurate and detailed as the look on the 10k camera . but overall that difference isnt worth 10k unless its for movie production the iphone is still more worth it
@@abz7800 no, it’s not. We’ve seen comparisons last year between the 15 Pro Max and a $100,000 camera with professional film makers who actually know how to do post properly and most of the shots they did even they said it was almost impossible to see the difference of depth of field was balanced between the two. I agree from my own testing over some time. Most of the differences we’re seeing here is that they didn’t use the best codec von the iPhone and they did t match depth of field. Obviously the phone is going to be different in that and you can immediately tell which is which because of it. The Komodo has a reputation of being difficult to balance in post, and its dynamic range is off.
@@ItsTomRich iphone is amazing in terms of video clarity and quality. It defeats S24 in that. But I love S24 video because it gives cinematic video quality like we are watching batman movie or any Hollywood movie
Stop! These TYbers crack me up😂. This is a OG Komodo and an iPhone in no world can compete. When you drop in post the raw files, no chance. Also the Komodo is not $10k. 🤦🏿♂️😂
Based on this video alone, in most cases, the iPhone 16 Pro performs better. The Komodo is known for having relatively poor image quality among entry-level cinema cameras, but people are just blindly believing in the "RED" brand name.
Seen this video and could not even be bothered to watch it. It’s same old every single year and it’s tiresome. People that think the iPhone pro camera is even close to a decent DSLR or Mirrorless are just dreaming so why even test it ! You will lose quality over RUclips as well. I am a pro photographer and admit when the time is right, I do use my iPhone pro max, especially if the area is kinda, let’s say uneasy! lol I also sometimes use black electrical tape across any names of my equipment, when abroad especially. Anyhow you don’t even need to watch these videos, these are night and day difference between pro and iPhone. Also companies are now integrating Ai into the mirrorless cameras and so soon the gap will get even bigger as the only advantage iPhone had is software as the hardware is shit in comparison. That gap will be irrelevant soon. however most pro shooters don’t want shitty Ai messing up their photos or the artistic vision they are aiming for and will edit it their way.
Agreed! Smartphone photography is great, and the steps that Apple have made in the space is impressive, but you simply cannot beat physics nor the utility, modularity, and opportunity that a big camera with a huge sensor and big lenses brings you. You can edit a DLSR or Mirrorless camera to make it look like an iPhone shot, but you can’t truly make an iPhone/smartphone picture look like a professional camera, nor can you with video.
День назад+1
Yeah there it goes the first in many IPhone vs Stuff we know it wouldn’t beat videos😂 why are people making this vids every year? I mean come on make some relevant an stunning with the iPhone no more clickbait.
What a joke is this trying to compare a RED with an iPhone. If you use a RED you use it for serous filming that means for a film or comercial where you have a script, a team, a lighting crew and you use different lenses for different situations and scenes including anamorphic lenses. For recording people walking on the beach with their dogs obviously you will see zero difference between an iPhone or a RED as it really does not matter what you use.
All these people praising iphone lol watching this on a phone screen in 720p probably 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Iphone is good but jesus in an editing room they are really not even on the same league obviously
In what world does this comparison make sense? In fact, any mobile phone camera setup. Until mft becomes defacto it's not even worth doing. Different sensors, lenses nothing comparable in reality.
tbh, they both seem extremely similar in quality so I rathr buy the muuuuuch less expensive one when it comes to these two devices. I say iphone gets the win on this one. And I'm not an apple fanboy or anything like that.
I'd still choose that RED camera, it's just so much better in terms of the tue to life colours. not saying the iphone is bad in this regards, it's quite the opposite, but you said it yourself Tom, the iPhone just wants to computationally balance everything, most especially exposure levels
🔥Gahdamn that was a quick upload! Great video and the location with the cliffs looks just awesome!
Certainly was a grind of a day 🤣 can’t wait for your vid!
We are waiting for the iPhone 16 Pro Max comparison with the S24 Ultra
I will do with the iPhone 16 pro, since they’re the same camera 🙏
@@ItsTomRich Do use MotionCam on S24 Ultra :)
There’s a few videos out there. I recommend watching it on an iPhone so you can really tell the difference in quality between Samsung vs iPhone shots
I don't recommend to watch it on a iPhone it's way too small. @@ETrain12
S24 ultra gives cinematic batman and marvel like video quality and Iphone gives the best video quality as per mobile😅
Cinematic mode is underrated
Hmmm interesting
Overall the RED takes the wins, but the fact the iPhone can even compete slightly is gnarly. I've heard "28 Years Later" just finished principal photography and it was shot on iPhone 15 Pro Max - definitely need to watch it when it comes out.
In my opinion, the results speak for themselves. Steven Spielberg once said: "You shouldn't dream your film, you should make it", if you couldn't before now you can.
Yeah, no computational magic can beat the pro camera but my God Apple...
This 🙏
Nah iPhone won this one
Slightly? thats a bit of an understatement. It can compete, even though a RED is best for cinematic, the iPhone sure could compete and in some situations it was even better. With a professional rig, accessories and post work, you can make great cinematic shots with it. and still, its just a phone with small lens, small sensor.
Can't wait to see this. LOVE RED cameras - the RED Komodo is one of my absolute favourites :) Just finished watching the new mountain biking film on Red Bull TV and it was shot on RED cameras :) :) :)
Enjoy the video 🙌🏼🙌🏼 they definitely are sick
Honestly the Pro is where it's at this year. Not too small but not gigantic. Definitely a great all rounder if you dislike large phones.
Agreed it’s great they’ve got the 5X telephoto now
6'3 is a huge phone what u on chinaboi
@@smashthestateX wow racist and dumb. Haven't seen that combo in a while.
@@joelconolly5574 haha. Some people can't help themselves.
@@joelconolly5574hmm idk it would have been perfect if the phone was like at 6.5 inch for me
Color rendition of the basketball court fence from the Komodo is dope, full stop. The whites look more enticing than ice cream.
Great video! Quick tip: When you jump for vertical height, try to stop rather than continuing to move forward. Stop and swing your arms back and then upwards with your body as you jump up. This way your height isn't stolen by the horizontal momentum.
Hahaha this is a good tip thank you 😬🙏 never tried dunking in my life and it’s harder than it looks 😂
isn't the Casetify brand facing a theft lawsuit right now...?
yes. that stuff happens with brands.
Was looking for this comment 😂😂
I know nothing about photography 🙂↕️ great video. I just bought the iPhone 16pro and it’s great to see its capabilities and what people who have better equipment have to say!
Compare it with black magic micro studio or blackmagic 6k camera.
Also you have to consider the price and the single lens the Red Camera is using right now, it's 35 MM Anamorphic Lens that costlier than iPhone
It’s not anamorphic, it’s a 35mm DZO cine lens but yeah the setup is spenny haha
@@ItsTomRich It looked like and I was not sure about it, thanks for letting me know, do you think the color can be a little bit better for iPhone after color grading, ofc it can't achieve the color profile of red though
@rethinkwithroy agreed!
We live in a time when we compare phones to professional cameras.... it's insane what these phones can do. Director Danny Boyle used iPhone 15 Pro to shot incoming 28 Years Later movie. It's a proof that all you need is an good idea and creativity. Technicality doesn't matter that much anymore. We already have cheap technology on our hands.
also you can do the editing from the iPhone straight up even outdoors with a 2000 nit display.
would be cool if Casetify made a case with a minimalistic sliding built in ND Filter in it...
Great video, can i ask was the talking head part with you in your room shot on an iPhone or another camera? Thanks
No that was my A7SIII
Make on Samsung S24 Ultra vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max comparison.
Red looked better across the board but iPhone was pretty good. I’d love to see them compared in a controlled studio setting
would have been good to compare the phone with a lens on the Komodo that didn't have so much chromatic aberration. The depth of field on the Komodo was definitely nice, the lens was very soft though.
Ok. Give the RED camera all the Smartphone capabilities of the iPhone. Call it the RED Apple. LoL
Make calls on the RED? 🥴
@@ItsTomRich something like sending video from RED to ICloud, instantly. Geolocation, Find my, Bluetooth, stuff like that. 😅
Somebody know where are shot there amazing images ? (Thank you)❤
This was around Brighton area :)
@@ItsTomRich thank you ! In France, it’s look like the Etretat cliff !
I would love to see this done again with the iPhone shooting in ProRes LOG.
Did you not watch? Basically the entire video was ProRes LOG haha
@@ItsTomRich2:29 you said the biggest difference was the RAW format so cut the dude some slack
I wasn’t trying to be a dick, I genuinely was asking haha. Quite a lot of people comment without watching 🫠
Nice. Maybe the iPhone is the best combo with the Red as a b cam haha
Hahahah
Depth of field…. Wow what a difference so dreamy, long way ahead for phones
Eeeey Brighton! Righton.
Comparisons like these only add to the confidence why we decided to go the route of the Lumix GH5II, or any of the newer GH series models. Paired with an Atomos Ninja V and a cache of Cinema lenses like the Zeiss CP.2’s, the world is just more open. It even afforded us multiple cameras for B and C cams…
Camera like the Komodo are just too cumbersome, which is why we even got rid of Blackmagic cameras too. The cost benefits were just not worth it in our opinion, for the pice of a Komodo, we could get entire sets of Cinema Glass, or at least a couple pairs of top quality glass…
Ultimately the end results are nearly indistinguishable…
🤔
Is it worth buying a $3000 dslr camera or 16 pro max for normal you tube videos?
DSLR
I love this comparison!!!! It would actually be crazy to see Apple make proper cinema cameras.
Really glad you liked it 🙌🏼
S25 Ultra lets gooo
So what you're saying is, beast cage + lenses = About as good as a red Komodo
great comparison, it is still a long way to emulate a film camera, the "new audio features" sound horrible to me.
The scene I chose was pretty tricky - I’ll cover it in more detail in my photographers review
DOF is the next frontier for Apple
my only issue with iPhone footage is that is too sharp. I use mist filters to make it softer and more organic looking.
Agreed this is definitely a big issue. But apple log does soften it a lot
@@ItsTomRich Yes, Apple log is a game changer.
why everyone talks about camera while display doesn't support 4k, good HDR images. for example my 12promax display doesn't show exact quality picture taken my 14promax or 16 pro max. same picture has different display on iphone itself. we need good quality display while having great cameras. our family has variety levels of iphones, each one phone display shows different quality in image
I'm happy with iPhone 16 Pro results. I feel it would've had better results with filters etc... :) Awesome comparison video :) Thanks :)
yeah, this is probably true - I just took the decision that literally 99.9% of people don't use filters on their phone haha
10 000$ camera with yesterday’s prices. The Komodo X is sub 10k 😅which could do the 120fps you wanted the komodo to do.
I have the 12 pro max but I’m looking at the 16 pro max studio mics but my carrier says that they’ll give me free air pods pro 2 with iPhone 15 pro max so I’m torn if I should save money and get free AirPods or just go with the 16 pro max because I waited for so long 😮
I’ve got a 15 pro max just get that and get the buds
@@KadenBarbibtta 🥹👍
Tbh, very few differences between the 15 & 16. If you want the AirPods go for that
@@ItsTomRich wow I wasn’t expecting this
when you compare 1500$ to 10000$ there is a winner other then that you cannot really replace the physical camera but more people will access to great cameras via smartphones then old days when you want an great camera you need a physical one which is expensive
kalum"s mom or dad originally should be sri lankan right ?
the iphone slowmo image is better, but the compression and bokeh of the lens on the red helps it look professional. use a mirrorless camera with better slowmo would wipe the red and iphone. red is overrated, what saves it is the high dynamic range.
YA're Wrong ❗️
Even Previous Generations i-Phone's 1080p １２０FPS Slo-Mo is As Good As That of Sony Mirrorless ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️
Only Reason that Mirrorless Slo-Mo Looks Nice is Because The Background Image is Blur out and Only Focused Image Stands out, Overall Image Data Can Save and It Deters Compression Artefacts to Generate out of Lack of Image Transfer Transaction.
But When YA Need Deep DOF Motion Picture and Everything Should be Crispy in Focus, Even Sony Most High-End Mirrorless Can Struggle Because Their Data Bit NormaLly Can Not Exceed ４００Mbps.
On The Other Hand i-Phone 16 Pro/Pro Max Record ４K １２０FPS ProRes Log Shooting with SSD ATTACHED that Enables Over １,０００Mbps Shooting Video.
ruclips.net/video/d1_QWs0llFc/видео.html
Red is not overrated. You have to get a Sony a9iii to get a global shutter which is more expensive than the red, and the red has better colours and compression format than the Sony
Every RUclipsr with a new apple toy need to compare their toy with big boys, why?
I think it’s interesting :)
It cracks me up, there’s no comparison what so ever either.
It’s the mics that have surprised me most with my 16… sound is way better
If someone compares iPhone with professional camera it means you don’t know anything about videography. . I have the iphone 15 pro max and I can’t compare it with a $15000 sony camera
It’s for fun,this is a “you sure must be fun in parties moment”.
Would you understand reasoning behind someone using it to shot major feature film¿
The iPhone is slightly sharper in most of the shots. Overall, the color is often better. As someone who shot Tv commercials way back in the 1970s, I can tell you that the weight of the rig might help for a short time when beginning a shoot. It quickly becomes tiring and hand arm shake takes over. If a higher quality version of the codec on the iPhone was used, there would have been a difference. The past couple of iPhones have the capability of looking very cinematic if handled properly. You really need a tiny external SSD to shoot the higher quality codec. But that’s not really a big problem. I’m finding the 16 Pro Max that its a slightly bit better than the 15 Pro Max. The main problem is, obviously, that the smaller chip has a lot more depth of field. But the chips inside keep getting larger and the main camera sensor is now almost a 1” sensor. There are a few pretty good lenses for smartphones and each generation gets better. If somehow Apple made it possible to remove the lens and replace it with full lenses, it would be amazing.
nah the 10k camera is better in everyshot it has way more detail and less noise . the sharpening your talking about maybe just the artificial sharpening by iphone but its not as accurate and detailed as the look on the 10k camera . but overall that difference isnt worth 10k unless its for movie production the iphone is still more worth it
@@abz7800 no, it’s not. We’ve seen comparisons last year between the 15 Pro Max and a $100,000 camera with professional film makers who actually know how to do post properly and most of the shots they did even they said it was almost impossible to see the difference of depth of field was balanced between the two. I agree from my own testing over some time. Most of the differences we’re seeing here is that they didn’t use the best codec von the iPhone and they did t match depth of field. Obviously the phone is going to be different in that and you can immediately tell which is which because of it. The Komodo has a reputation of being difficult to balance in post, and its dynamic range is off.
Real camera is real camera 📸
Title should be iphone 16 vs nikon
Hahah
Nikon had nothing to do with that camera
What a comparison 😂😂. Iphone even fail in video quality by S24 ultra and you are comparing with professional movie camera 😂😂😂
I mean it definitely doesn’t lol, i love the S24 ultra but it can’t compare to apple log
@@ItsTomRich iphone is amazing in terms of video clarity and quality. It defeats S24 in that. But I love S24 video because it gives cinematic video quality like we are watching batman movie or any Hollywood movie
У Komodo видео живое, у Айфон «искусственное», нет смысла сравнивать такую технику с айфон.
Compare with pixel 9 pro
I almost hate how good technology has become. Plus this AI coming.. man.. things will be different
Stop! These TYbers crack me up😂. This is a OG Komodo and an iPhone in no world can compete. When you drop in post the raw files, no chance. Also the Komodo is not $10k. 🤦🏿♂️😂
Based on this video alone, in most cases, the iPhone 16 Pro performs better. The Komodo is known for having relatively poor image quality among entry-level cinema cameras, but people are just blindly believing in the "RED" brand name.
What? 🤦🏿♂️
RED looks waaaaaaaaay better no comparaison at all
iPhone has no chance but the Red is not ten times better...
someone to buy me an Iphone i promise to go to church every sunday🐒
Seen this video and could not even be bothered to watch it. It’s same old every single year and it’s tiresome. People that think the iPhone pro camera is even close to a decent DSLR or Mirrorless are just dreaming so why even test it ! You will lose quality over RUclips as well. I am a pro photographer and admit when the time is right, I do use my iPhone pro max, especially if the area is kinda, let’s say uneasy! lol I also sometimes use black electrical tape across any names of my equipment, when abroad especially. Anyhow you don’t even need to watch these videos, these are night and day difference between pro and iPhone. Also companies are now integrating Ai into the mirrorless cameras and so soon the gap will get even bigger as the only advantage iPhone had is software as the hardware is shit in comparison. That gap will be irrelevant soon. however most pro shooters don’t want shitty Ai messing up their photos or the artistic vision they are aiming for and will edit it their way.
Agreed! Smartphone photography is great, and the steps that Apple have made in the space is impressive, but you simply cannot beat physics nor the utility, modularity, and opportunity that a big camera with a huge sensor and big lenses brings you. You can edit a DLSR or Mirrorless camera to make it look like an iPhone shot, but you can’t truly make an iPhone/smartphone picture look like a professional camera, nor can you with video.
Yeah there it goes the first in many IPhone vs Stuff we know it wouldn’t beat videos😂 why are people making this vids every year? I mean come on make some relevant an stunning with the iPhone no more clickbait.
All camera killer iPhone
What a joke is this trying to compare a RED with an iPhone. If you use a RED you use it for serous filming that means for a film or comercial where you have a script, a team, a lighting crew and you use different lenses for different situations and scenes including anamorphic lenses. For recording people walking on the beach with their dogs obviously you will see zero difference between an iPhone or a RED as it really does not matter what you use.
too much noise and grain.. not really a sharp 4k.
People who compare an iPhone with proper cinema cameras have a brain size of a iPhone sensor. Period.
Lmfao
iPhone really looks trash. The Lens on the red is great, what is it?
iphone 16 plus camera test ples😢
No differences between plus and normal. People have done tests with the 16 🙏
Can you compare it with 15 pro, I think there are very suttle changes and not worth upgrading
I appreciate the time you put into this, but you didn't have to. 😇
Thanks for watching!
What are they paying you?))
supporting casetify? as a photographer yourself? guess integrity goes out the window when you can make a quick buck.
The phone not with it just for cameras I’ll stick with my13pro. No need to upgrade it’s how u use the phone
Plot twist: Labels are reversed
Imagine 😂
I am waiting iPhone 17 pro max
so many crap films are made with RED or other expensive cameras. Just because you drop 10 grand doesn't mean it will be good.
Martinez Patricia Williams Eric Harris Kenneth
Clark Deborah Martin Brenda Hall Larry
❤❤
All these people praising iphone lol watching this on a phone screen in 720p probably 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Iphone is good but jesus in an editing room they are really not even on the same league obviously
Davis Thomas Rodriguez Charles Johnson Timothy
I’m sorry 🤣
Look useless if you watch in 480p
In what world does this comparison make sense? In fact, any mobile phone camera setup. Until mft becomes defacto it's not even worth doing. Different sensors, lenses nothing comparable in reality.
You must be fun at parties
@@yizzymxyou legend 🤣🤣
@@3jvine i'm sure you are as well
@@bunyaadi thanks mate
a waste of 10 grand if you ask me haha
Too True ❗️😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I’ll tell Callam 🤣🤣🤣
Casetify are thieves and you should be ashamed of supporting this company for pennies
Camera iPhone 100$ maximum 😂 very bad in 2024
lol
tbh, they both seem extremely similar in quality so I rathr buy the muuuuuch less expensive one when it comes to these two devices. I say iphone gets the win on this one. And I'm not an apple fanboy or anything like that.
dude, ur tripod sucks. invest some more on tripod. u got really an awful tripod.
Lmao
I left the video as soon as you mentioned Casetify..
I'd still choose that RED camera, it's just so much better in terms of the tue to life colours.
not saying the iphone is bad in this regards, it's quite the opposite, but you said it yourself Tom, the iPhone just wants to computationally balance everything, most especially exposure levels