Klaus Schwab v. libertarians
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Klaus Schwab refers to libertarians in a villainous way as "anti-system", but his description of libertarianism is a total misrepresentation.
Watch the full replay of Marcos Falcone with Zach Weissmueller and Liz Wolfe on the Just Asking Questions podcast: • Milei vs. the WEF: Who...
Subscribe to the Just Asking Questions podcast:
RUclips Music: • Just Asking Questions
Apple: podcasts.apple...
Spotify: open.spotify.c...
Schwab's empty jargon boils down to central planning between business and government for the "greater good". He's an arrogant fool and a tyrant.
we need to get rid of big chains lol
Schwab is also called Karl Marx after the family line, and his wife comes from the Rothchild family
🎯
I don t know why they laughed
Klaus really thinks he is god who's the daddy😮
Why isn't Klaus holding a white Persian cat?
Because the cat didn't want to.
"Stakeholder capitalism" is not free trade, freely traded in the free market. I.e. it is nothing like capitalism . . . it is corporatism, otherwise known as fascism.
“Stakeholder Capitalism“
Who are they asserting holds these stakes? Self-appointed “policy makers” and central planners? Or just any third-party observer who wants to control wealth they didn’t risk creating?
"Stakeholder" is merely a weasel term for someone who wants the state to forcibly give them control over a decision that they have no right to control.
@@PrezVeto Agree.
"Stakeholder capitalism" on it's own doesn't mean anything. But to Klaus it does; to him it's a euphemism for social justice and the common good. Phrases that tyrants have been using for ages as justification for their unrelenting authoritarianism and draconian methods.
Let the WEF tremble at the might of libertarianism. Libertarians unite!!!
It could be that Klaus tried to put on sheep's clothing or the WEF did not do their homework (fact checking) before giving this speaker the podium
Or they've read the room and realized that if they don't engage with criticism, they'll become irrelevant. It wouldn't be too difficult for someone to arrange an alternative conference.
The Wef and UN ARE Klaus Schwab…. And WHO…
Zach takes the most milquetoast interpretation of Klaus Schwab's past remarks. He applies a kind of bias toward moderation that is not any more based on facts than other interpretations. Though he postures as such. Granted, there are some interpretations that are completely off the reservation. But to believe that Schwab is completely benign based on his past remarks is simply burying one's head in the sand. Every lover of liberty should be on HIGH ALERT based on things Schwab has openly said out loud. IMO.
I agree fully
Don’t ever remember electing Schwab
Man, that cat comes right out of a comic book.
I'm with Liz on this one. I'm an ancap, and yes, I'd like to see end of governments and have everything privatized. But people being people, that doesn't mean Utopia is going to pop up out of nowhere and that there won't be any problems. What it DOES mean is that people in the private sector will have more opportunities and choices when it comes to dealing with those problems. They won't be legally restricted from trying something different, and won't have to suffer from wildly inappropriate one-size-fits-all solutions that clearly won't work for everyone being coercively imposed on them.
Exactly. People who imagine that centralization of power will somehow result in benevolent experts occupying the seats of power confuse me. Even if someone was naive enough to believe those would be the kind of people that would seek that kind of power, those seats could easily be occupied by ruthless opportunists. Setting up a system that could so easily be gamed is just a stupid idea. Let people choose and let markets do their work.
This is why I watch you guys. Zach is exactly right, totally correct and accurate using the term "corporatist" to define both the WEF and China. The submission of the private sector to the ideological goals centrally set and managed ("guided") by the State. That ideology was put together in the 1920's and in its pre-War form used to be called "Fascism". This is just an update.
Precisely. Thanks
Correct. Many people make the mistake of thinking this is Communism. It is Fascism. The state does not own the means of production but just co-opt the largest companies in private sector, gives out exclusive contracts, destroys small businesses. The selected companies just have to do as the state requires to implement its policies.
Remember how that worked under Covid.
evil super villain vs people who like freedom
🇮🇱
Goodbye Dr Evil you will not be missed it amazes me how easily our elected politicians and media fell into line with this Maniac
Won’t it be fun to read Schwab’s obituary? Not too long now…
💯
They’ll upload his brilliance into the wef supercomputer to rule over the metaverse.
@@droogie76 I'd install it exclusively in bathroom attendant robots... a little towel over the arm, silver tray, mints...
These ghouls always live to 100+. They have the secret sauce.
12:30 he always talks about a one world government. It’s literally on their website, dude… It’s called slow walking people. Wake up..
8:12 this guy is a lefty. He’s gotta be bought and paid for… or just slow of mind
We judge them by their fruits. And their fruits are rotten…
Pure evil
Klaus’s soul, his higher self, beyond the ego, is highly disappointed with himself, and so his ego will face karmic justice.
Since the 60's, when I started paying attention ' We are an Historic CROSSROADS..." is a constant drum they beat. Every country, every politician, every stock broker... etc... yeah, sure...
Don't forget the most important election in history.
What if they were right every time? Things are changing at unprecedented rate for the last 150 years or so.
@@blurglide They are mistakenly assigning a telos to history. It's pure imagination.
Never been happier to be a libertarian
I don’t like the UN, but I trust them more than Klaus.
At least the UN has a charter and is moderated by the nature of competing state interests.
They’re both born out of the CFR and the IMF think of them as mother and father, and all three of the previously mentioned the spawns of Satan..
I wish some of the more moderates of the liberty movement would focus LESS on differentiating themselves from the most ridiculous parts of libertarianism. I don't think anybody is confusing Zach (I'll pick on Zach only bc I love him) with ideas of WEF as hegemonic communism. It's a waste of time, and really gives too much credence to the more ridiculous conspiracy theories out there. Also, the types that Zach represents do have a bad habit of painting competing views with the same brush as the more absurdist takes on, say, the WEF. This, too, is a failure and discredits the objectivity that Zach, et. al. aspire to. They have graciously welcomed people like Dave Smith to allow him to articulate just one example of a competing view. But, there is still this tendency to paint such points of view as "extreme" or otherwise unhinged or some other hyperbolic descriptor.
"cringe central planners". Very good. I'm going to use that.
The background and statements of Claus makes me very suspicious of anything coming from the WEF
This is my reaction and interpretation after listening to the new president of Argentina on the world economic forum over there in Switzerland there.
After listening to him several times.
I began to like all of the points that he was making and as I was liking the points that he was making with his facts I was very much reminded of an old book that I had read.
The book I refer to is Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.
For his speech embodied many of the same elements that were embodied in John galt's speech from that book.
The new president from Argentina also introduced a few other elements from that book from the speech that was given by the character in the book Atlas Shruggedd, known as Francisco and his speech on money.
His speech though shorter than Atlas shrugs material was most enlightening and entertaining to listen to in the real world as opposed to the unreal real world presented in Atlas Shrugged.
On the subject of books there is one book that I highly recommend that every person on the planet would be well advised to read.
It is not a book of fiction, it is a book of fact.
The book's title is natural law the books author is Lysander Spooner.
I have found this book to be the best little book I have ever read on law of any kind. A three chapter 17 Page book. If you read it you will understand where mankind has gone wrong by moving away from natural law and moving toward authoritarian man-made law.
After considering the information in these books I decided I would take up the challenge of rewriting one of the most special laws contained within the Bill of Rights that I would rewrite the Second Amendment.
I call it Second Amendment 2.1
At this point you will need to read my further post on this same chat room about the National Rifle Association. So at this point please look for my other post in the same chat room about the National Rifle Association and what I further wrote and please be advised to look up and check out my book recommendations at the end.
@richardbobb1878 - I'm interested, where is the material you are referring to?
@rla927 The fact that the NRA the National Rifle Association changed its View to a more radical View of the second amendment in the year 1970. If you listen to the recent video on RUclips concerning the latest Omnibus gun control act worked on, they bring up every mass shooting event that ever occurred in history. Except for ONE "mass shooting" got no mention. What is this "mass shooting" that the government doesn't even want to talk about. What is this event that in 1970 rocked the boat of the National Rifle Association, and caused every second amendment organization to literally "freak out" in the year 1970.
On May 4th 1970 members of the Ohio National Guard fired into a crowd of Kent State University demonstrators killing four, and wounding nine Kent State students. The impact of the shooting was dramatic. The event triggered a national wide student strike, that forced hundreds of colleges and universities to close.
I find it sadly ironic that the demonstrators were demonstrating their displeasure over the war in Vietnam in general and the bombing in Cambodia in particular, carried out by President Nixon.
War is a "mass shooting" on a major scale ! .
As for the Second Amendment as currently written, I have some serious issues with it. It is poorly written, it is so poorly written and confusing that it must be reinterpreted by the Supreme Court. It does not explicitly say anything about self-defense. This has inspired me to write my new and improved version of the Second Amendment. I have named my new version.
Second Amendment 2.1
In order to maintain the blessings of liberty and freedom throughout the land.The pre-existing natural right of the individual to self-defense, shall always be upheld and protected. The right to manufacture, keep and bear arms ammunition, and parts and accessories for arms, will not be infringed or impeded. By any law or mandate, by either the states, or the federal government. A free market being necessary for a free people.The right to manufacture arms for sale, including, ammunition and accessories, for arms, will not be infringed or impeded. By any law or mandate. By the federal government, or the state's governments. This includes both carrying for an individual, or carrying for a company, for trade or sale in another state. Or any city or town, within a state. For any other moral reason. Uninfringed or impeded by law or mandate.
And there you have it my new and improved version of the Second Amendment 2.1 and for further Clarity, let me explain the term "pre-existing natural right of self-defense". The Second Amendment to the Constitution was adopted December 15th 1791. The concept of self-defense was created and adopted after the Norman conquest of England in 1066.
Coming back up through time back to 1970 and the mass shooting event at Kent State University there was a famous rock and roll band called Crosby Stills Nash & Young they made a song called "Ohio".
Previous to their song was the song written and produced,1964, by a young Native Canadian singer-songwriter, Buffy Sainte-Marie, The universal Soldier. I consider her song. The Best anti-war Song Ever written by a human being on this planet.
It is my most sincere hope that my version of the Second Amendment 2.1 will one day be recognized as being the best Second Amendment ever re-written, and adopted into law.
Also I highly recommend the following books, Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand, Adventures in Legal Land, by Marc Stevens. Government Indicted, by Mark Stevens, Freedom from Government by Trent Goodbaudy, And Natural Law, by Lysander Spooner. :-)
I guess this is the "restoring trust" that Klaus was talking about.
Why would the WEF be "reflexively hostile" to markets at all? Being the World *Economic* Forum and all. The Chinese, despite being Communists, certainly aren't hostile to markets. The form of government and how the economy behaves are not necessarily tied together.
They, the corporatists, want free reign in markets.
Central planners need a population of anarchists to operate because anarchists will never defend a culture. Individualism serves the empire and destroys nations
Wrong. You are a would-be tyrant.
14 hours ago
I didn’t think Reason were apologists for the WEF. Now We all know.
Did we see the same video? When did they apologise for the WEF?
True. Reason is anti WEP here. How does a false comment like this even get upvotes?
Don't vote for the exact same 2 losers that we all did in the LAST election! Instead, vote for open debate! Vote for the best! Vote for coherency and tact! Know WHO is actually running the country! Know who is CAPABLY running the country! Vote for RFK!
This guy is lying you can tell how hard he is trying to justify the truth about WEF
Has Milei even mentioned reducing the budgets of the military and police?? No.
True libertarians reduce the military and police funding at least as much as, or best more than, reduction of all other public expenditures. True libertarians _actually_ reduce the punitive-state.
No, Milie is not at all an actual libertarian nor ancap.
You're right if he's not perfect, he's trash. Worst libertarian ever! Lol c'mon bud.
@@ablinkin65 Hey Abe, you misread my OP. He’s not libertarian _at all._ do your research, the internet is right there. Find out what libertarian actually means. You don’t know yet.
I guess true libertarians can do everything at once like an omnipotent being too
@@vicvance1387 No. You didn’t read my comment. Read before you reply. Milei isn’t libertarian _at all._ Look up what libertarian means so you know. You have the internet right there.
As Liz pointed out, I'm not sure Libertarian is as narrowly-defined, in English at least, as this user is suggesting. He is definitely "above" (on the Nolan chart) all the other world leaders I can think of today, and that makes him the Most-Perfect Libertarian in such a position on the planet today. If someone better comes along, perhaps then I'll look down my nose at Milei.
P.S. Remember: If there are fewer laws, there is less for the police to do, and a military sitting on its ass is Less destructive than a regulator who sitting on his ass behind a desk.
Schwab is not misrepresenting what libertarians stand for in the slightest. All libertarians want to dismantle the current form of the state to some very significant extent, if not destroy it altogether. If you don't identify with that, that's surprising.
In a way, yes but there are parts of the system that would be better instituted in the private sector. You wouldn't get rid of everything, you would just privatize and localize.
@@Individual_Lives_Matter Yes, and that would be a different system. In one way of looking at things, you're destroying the system, in another you're transforming it into a decentralized, uncontrollable system. Either way it is conceptualized, it is indeed an awesome thing, and perhaps that's the key thing that I wish Liz had said instead of this roundabout "oh some libertarians only barely want to dismantle the system" like, so what? Klaus is right about Libertarians: they are opposed to the corporatist view; there is nothing to dispute there, only something to add: that dismantling one system does not dismantle society or prosperity, but rather improves it as free markets replace the statist and arbitrary system.
I live Liz, she's awesome, but I feel like sometimes she confuses connotation with diction, which should really never be confused.
Well I know not everyone is smart, but when I am told that someone is smart I don't expect to hear stupid things. When human is speaking telling me what my belief system means I had to take notice. Libertarian thought is about tearing your power system down Klaus but it is far more about building up individal's rights, responsibility, and self determination, it is about respecting each of us and expecting each of us to self govern. I trust, you will try to do better next time. Because I feel to compelled to use my free speech, respect and responsibility to say, you've got wrong it lad, and would you please consider giving up your wealth and power and joining the good peoples side. Thanks lad! Everyone is a Libertarian to a Libertarian.
Swab makes bank off of tickets he sells to his events. He'll allow a Lib in the room if it puts $$ in his pocket. I really don't credit him with having any guiding principles beyond $$ in his pocket - He crafts a narrative that makes him relevant to his audience.
WEF is water energy food, in plain sight.
Will not be eating ze bugs. Klaus Schwab can EAD though
👏
Libertarianism fits INTO the new world order. Resistance is futile. XOXO--The Borg
We don't need politicians on boards of corporations. We have ALEC.
Could you elaborate on that?
@@LynyrdSkynyrd.4Ever
American Legislative Exchange Council
Reason is pushing WEF?
Opposite. Read the video description.
Zach is doing the charitable interpretation defense but he's not saying Schwab is a good guy or anything.
Klaus for the win.
1:00 I love how Schwab calls Milei radical.
Liberties? Vat are zeese "liberties?" Vee vill determine all ze liberties!!!