The First Century Resurrection
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Jesus made a promise to resurrection and judge the living and the dead when he returned. How did the resurrection of the dead occur if Jesus returned in 66AD? We'll conclude our series on the resurrection by looking at historical accounts by early historians that suggest the resurrection occurred at this time.
This video is based on my article, "The Resurrection of the Dead"
revelationsing...
And "Chapter 14 - The First Century Resurrection"
revelationsing...
If you enjoy this content, you'll enjoy my book, "On Time: Re-examining the End Times and Jesus’ Return." Please leave a review on Amazon if you enjoy reading it.
www.amazon.com...
New sub! I totally thought I was on another channel (There’s No Place Like Home) and realized Ruach Ha Qodesh suggested yet another channel! Awesome! I’ve had this one question and you cleared it up. Great video.
Hi @TXDHC, thanks for subscribing! I'm really glad I was able to satisfactorily answer your question :)
What are your thoughts on the transfiguration event? And who are the dead at the white throne judgment in Rev ? Thanks for your work! New sub!
Hi @angelawaldoch2753, thanks for subscribing! Yahoo!
I believe the transfiguration event was meant to show that Jesus and his ministry was superior to the Old Covenant. Moses and Elijah represented the law and the prophets and Jesus was bringing in the New Covenant and grace and it would have far more glory than the glory of the Old Covenant. There's an indication in the Old Testament that Elijah never died like Enoch (2 Kings 2:11). Scripture says Moses died, but that God buried him and no one could find his tomb (Deuteronomy 34:5-6).
"Who are the dead at the White Throne Judgment?"
Recall that only the believing martyrs were resurrected in the first resurrection.
Revelation 20:4 (WEB) I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the word of God, and such as didn’t worship the beast nor his image, and didn’t receive the mark on their forehead and on their hand.
Revelation 6:9-10 (WEB) When he opened the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been killed for the Word of God, and for the testimony of the Lamb which they had. 10 They cried with a loud voice, saying, “How long, Master, the holy and true, until you judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?”
Hebrews 11:35 (WEB) Others were tortured, not accepting their deliverance, that they might obtain a better resurrection.
Notice in Hebrews that by "not accepting their deliverance" they would obtain a "better resurrection," or I believe the "first resurrection." This was an honor given to those who were willing to sacrifice their lives for their faith in God.
That means the rest of the dead consisted of the saints who were not martyrs and the wicked who were to be resurrected and judged.
Does that answer your question?
@@revelationsingraceJohn Paul, thanks, I found your video a few years ago, and it was so helpful in my search for truth.
I saw a Doug Wilson video the other day. Preterists know the Reformed guys have been painting us badly, bc of the creeds and the “bodily” resurrection. A thought hit me. Do you think Michael fighting the devil over Moses body maybe could mean Michael was fighting over Jesus’ body, bc Jesus was the current day Moses? It never made sense that that verse was in Jude. The creed guys like to say we will get a new body, bc Jesus did, but maybe Jesus was an anomaly, bc they definitely would have fought over his physical body. I think the resurrection is spiritual. Jesus body was created by Yahweh anyway inside of Mary. It was quite special.
I haven’t looked into Jubilees or any other outside book to see if the Michael story was in there.
Hi@@SonofGodNOW, thanks for watching. I'm encouraged to hear that my video helped you in your search for truth years ago.
I believe Jude is referring to an extra biblical source there that we have where angels did argue over Moses body. I can't remember which book it is? Maybe the Book of Enoch? Could be another.
I have a series on the resurrection if you're interested:
revelationsingrace.com/articles/the-resurrection-of-the-dead/
Does that answer your question?
@@revelationsingrace Thanks
Sheol/hades = the grave. not some special holding place for dead people.
The resurrection and heaven was for the elect of Israel. Nothing in the ancient Hebrew writings says anything about those who practice the religion of Christianity go to heaven.
Hi @cc3775, thanks for watching! I'm not sure if Sheol/Hades was simply the grave or if it was an invisible realm. It doesn't make much sense that it would be an invisible place if everyone is simply unconscious there. However, some verses describe it poetically in terms indicating it is an invisible realm, "the gates of Sheol." However, I'm not offended at whatever view you hold, and each has some ambiguous support.
What do you think it means to be an Israelite? For instance, if someone is born a Jew but rejects God and his covenant, does he remain God's exclusive people? Or in inverse, what if someone is not born a Jew yet loves God with all their heart and keeps his covenant, does such a person have no chance of becoming part of God's people? Consider Ishmael, he was born of Abraham, yet he did not inherit the promises.
“I will call them ‘my people,’ which were not my people;
and her ‘beloved,’ who was not beloved.”Hosea 2:23
26 “It will be that in the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’
there they will be called ‘children of the living God.’”Hosea 1:10
“If the number of the children of Israel are as the sand of the sea,
it is the remnant who will be saved;
28 for He will finish the work and cut it short in righteousness,
because the LORD will make a short work upon the earth.”Isaiah 10:22-23
A person is a Jew who keeps God's covenant, not someone who is merely is fortunate enough to be born of Abraham. If a Christian keeps God's covenant, he is considered part of God's family and thus would go to heaven. If a Jew by birth keeps God's covenant, he likewise would go to heaven. But if someone does not keep God's covenant, they are not part of God's family, they are not guaranteed heaven.
@@revelationsingrace Jew and Israelite are not synonymous. A Jew originally meant a Judahite someone who was from Judea. Then it became synonymous with those Israelites who practiced law. Not all Israelites are Jews. You can’t use therm for all of Israel. Israel was scattered into the nations and became the nations.
“And God said to Abraham, “As for Sarai your wife, you shall not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall be her name. I will bless her, and moreover, I will give you a son by her. I will bless her, and she shall become nations; kings of peoples shall come from her.””
Genesis 17:15-16
“No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham, for I have made you the father of a multitude of nations.”
Genesis 17:5
“But his father refused and said, “I know, my son, I know. He also shall become a people, and he also shall be great. Nevertheless, his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his offspring shall become a multitude of nations.””
Genesis 48:19
Ok, I wasn't aware of the distinction between Jews and Israelites, I assumed they were synonymous. Thank you for explaining that. I like the verses you quote because they show that any nation that keeps God's covenant becomes children of Sarah.
Recall how Jesus died without any children. Yet, the prophet Isaiah stated that Jesus would have many descendants.
Isaiah 53 (NLT):
"But it was the Lord’s good plan to crush him
and cause him grief.
Yet when his life is made an offering for sin,
he will have many descendants."
How does a man who leaves earth with no children considered to have "many descendants?" Because in God's eyes, when a person puts their faith in the Messiah and keeps his New Covenant, he is regarded as a descendant of Jesus, the true Israelite, despite the fact that he was not physically born from Jesus' body. And by being a descendant of Jesus, he is also a descendant of Abraham.
Good analogy at the end there.
Thank you! I'm glad you enjoyed it!
For your position to be true. The MOST HIGH and the SON would have to break their promises and their Word. Namely: Jeremiah 33:24-26 & Matthew 15:24 Thus making them liars...Is this your position?
I'm not sure I understand your position. I believe Israel continues forever under the throne of David. We who put our faith in Christ are grafted into Israel, while those who reject the Messiah are cut off of Israel (Romans 11). Jesus, the true descendant of David rules over this true Israel forever.
Greetings @revelationsingrace my position is explicitly what Jeremiah 30, 31 and 33:verse 24-26 says about literal Israel. Not only this but I do not hold that Israel has not been replaced by the gentile heathen nations aka Christians. The MASTER clearly states that he came for Israel in Matthew 15:24.
I know that you hold true that Israel has been replaced by Christianity.
In addition to all this also contend that the words of Paul cannot be used to overrule prophecy which are the spoken words of The Most High.
I know that Christians hold Paul above all else ....but Paul's Doctrine cannot be used to overrule or replace what the MASTER taught his disciples and preached during his earthly mission. He taught the gospel of the Kingdom which is the Torah.
Deuteronomy 13:1-5 (WEBM) If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises in your midst you, and he gives you a sign or a wonder,
and the sign or the wonder comes to pass, of which he spoke to you, saying, “Let us go after other gods” (which you have not known) “and let us serve them”;
you shall not listen to the words of that prophet, or to that dreamer of dreams; for the LORD your God is testing you, to know whether you love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
You shall walk after the LORD your God, fear him, keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and you shall serve him, and cling to him.
That prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death, because he has spoken rebellion against the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to draw you aside out of the way which the LORD your God commanded you to walk in. So you shall remove the evil from your midst.
*Remember Paul emphatically rejected the Torah thus almost single-handedly creating what is called Christianity all on his own.*
He even opposed Peter to his face remember Peter was the Rock by which the master built his Ecclesia. Matt 16:18.
Not only this Peter stated that he was called to the Gentiles in Acts 15:7.
Finally to further elaborate on my position I believe that we are most likely only in the Little season. "MOST Likely" the only thing that keeps me from holding 100% Little season is that I don't have proof that's the words of the end time prophets have come to pass.
@@RebukeTHYkingdom It's not just the words of Paul, Jesus himself stated that the Gentiles would be grafted into Israel (Matthew 8:10-12; 12:18-21) while those Israelites who rejected the Messiah would be cast out.
Paul was well studied in the Old Testament scriptures. He didn't invent Christianity, it was foretold by the prophet Isaiah and other prophets. Particularly if you read Isaiah 40 onwards you'll notice a consistent theme of God remaking Israel. Notice for instance how Christ was said to receive many children.
Isaiah 53:10 (NIV) Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer,
and though the Lord makes his life an offering for sin,
he will see his offspring and prolong his days,
and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand.
Jesus didn't have any physical descendants, so who were these children God was going to give him?
Throughout the Old Testament, it wasn't the physical descendants of Abraham who were Israel but those of faith. Ishmael was a physical descendant of Abraham, yet he did not receive the inheritance, because the inheritance depends on a promise and not on being physical descendants. Esau was a physical descendant of Abraham, yet only Jacob and not he inherited the promise. This was a picture of what would happen in the last days. God's firstborn, physical Israel, would reject Christ and their inheritance, and it would be given to the younger brother, the child of faith.
When one puts their trust in Christ, they become his offspring and therefore the seed of Israel.
Isaiah 56:3 (NIV) Let no foreigner who is bound to the Lord say,
“The Lord will surely exclude me from his people.”
And let no eunuch complain,
“I am only a dry tree.”
In Isaiah 65, God talks about how the Gentiles would be included in his people, while those who rejected him would be excluded even if they were physical descendants of Abraham.
Isaiah 65:1-2,15 (NIV) “I revealed myself to those who did not ask for me;
I was found by those who did not seek me.
To a nation that did not call on my name,
I said, ‘Here am I, here am I.’
2 All day long I have held out my hands
to an obstinate people,
who walk in ways not good,
pursuing their own imaginations
..
15 ...the Sovereign Lord will put you to death,
but to his servants he will give another name.
These are not a couple verses in isolation, the entire Old Testament is filled with repeated references to a future time when the Gentiles would be included in Israel while those natives of Israel who rejected their Messiah would be cast out. Jesus himself repeated these ideas in a few places. Although God had limited himself for a time to be exclusively Israel's God, he would become God of all the earth, and invite everyone into his people Israel.
Paul did not create Christianity, God created Christianity, Paul just delivered the understanding of what God had spoken. Even Peter was told by God to "kill and eat", that is, to associate with the Gentiles because they would be invited into God's inheritance. They received the spirit, and although it astonished the early Christians, they disciples quickly realized that the Gentiles had been invited into Israel. That's why they were ok with Paul preaching to them and didn't forbid him from doing so.
This understanding was called a mystery, because it had been veiled in the Old Testament scriptures until the last days when prophecy was unsealed and God gave understanding of his word through the Holy Spirit.
@@revelationsingraceDo Gentiles have access to salvation? YES
Do they completely replace Israel? NO.
Even Paul says this G-d did not reject Israel Romans 11:1.
There has always been a provision for strangers and Gentile nations to be allowed access to The Ways of The MOST HIGH in TORAH even during the times of Moses in the wilderness. Exodus 12:38. Remember that there was a mixed multitude that came out of Egypt.
In the same context there have always been children of Israel that were LOST due to Faithlessness, Rebellion and Lawlessness. See (Numbers 16:32) this is an example of a judgment for those Sons of Jacob who rejected the ways of the MOST HIGH and his Prophet (Moses).
They went down alive into the belly of the Earth. Just like in Matthew 8: 11 unto those who refuse Messiah and were cast out into outer darkness. Matthew 8:12 cannot be used to state that the Gentiles completely replace Israel In the Kingdom.
Furthermore if you want to study it even deeper you can look at the SHem Tov version of the gospel of Matthew and you will see that the character known as the Roman centurion is depicted as a Pharisee soldier but he has authority over 100 men thus the monitor centurion… At least this is what the “Shem Tov” indicates: take it for what it's worth.
Furthermore, All the scriptures in Isaiah that you mentioned are in the context that the heathen nations are will be drawn to the light of salvation therefore this is prophecy that I do not dispute
However, Isaiah does not put forth that gentiles completely replace ALL of Israel. Matt 8:11 says that many will come from the East and the West, basically echoing the scriptures that state that the Gentiles will be drawn to the light of Israel. As in Isaiah as in Isaiah 65 that you have so aptly put forth.
Furthermore Isaiah 56 specifically has to do with Gentiles who wanted to keep the Torah specifically keeping the Sabbath. I noticed how you conveniently skipped over verse 2 and 4 of Isaiah 56. it states that the MOST HIGH will not exclude them keeping his Sabbath's. It does not indicate that Gentiles replace Israel.
Isaiah 56 does not apply to lawless Christians who refused to keep the Sabbath on Saturday.
In order for your position to be true that all Christians have replaced all of Israel you have to ignore all the rest of Isaiah and Jeremiah, Daniel, Hosea, Micah ,Baruch, Ezra, Joel, Zephaniah, all of the Prophets.
Finally, Let's just keep it basic, you're essentially saying that the MOST HIGH was not able to save Israel so much so that they were entirely replaced by the people who were prophesied to seek the light…don't you realize that you are ignoring Jeremiah 30, 31,32 and 33? To prop up this Ultra Grace Doctrine?
@@revelationsingrace
Do Gentiles have access to salvation? YES
Do Christians completely replace Israel? NO.
Even Paul says this G-d did not reject Israel Romans 11:1.
There has always been a provision for strangers and Gentile nations to be allowed access to The Ways of The MOST HIGH in TORAH even during the times of Moses in the wilderness. Exodus 12:38. Remember that there was a mixed multitude that came out of Egypt.
In the same context there have always been children of Israel that were LOST due to Faithlessness, Rebellion and Lawlessness. See (Numbers 16:32) this is an example of a judgment for those Sons of Jacob who rejected the ways of the MOST HIGH and his Prophet (Moses).
They went down alive into the belly of the Earth. Just like in Matthew 8: 11 unto those who refuse Messiah and were cast out into outer darkness. Matthew 8:12 cannot be used to state that the Gentiles completely replace Israel In the Kingdom.
Furthermore if you want to study it even deeper you can look at the SHem Tov version of the gospel of Matthew and you will see that the character known as the Roman centurion is depicted as a Pharisee soldier but he has authority over 100 men thus the monitor centurion… At least this is what the “Shem Tov” indicates: take it for what it's worth.
Furthermore, All the scriptures in Isaiah that you mentioned are in the context that the heathen nations are will be drawn to the light of salvation therefore this is prophecy that I do not dispute
However, Isaiah does not put forth that gentiles completely replace ALL of Israel. Matt 8:11 says that many will come from the East and the West, basically echoing the scriptures that state that the Gentiles will be drawn to the light of Israel. As in Isaiah as in Isaiah 65 that you have so aptly put forth.
Furthermore Isaiah 56 specifically has to do with Gentiles who wanted to keep the Torah specifically keeping the Sabbath. I noticed how you conveniently skipped over verse 2 and 4 of Isaiah 56. it states that the MOST HIGH will not exclude them keeping his Sabbath's. It does not indicate that Gentiles replace Israel.
Isaiah 56 does not apply to lawless Christians who refused to keep the Sabbath on Saturday.
In order for your position to be true that all Christians have replaced all of Israel you have to ignore all the rest of Isaiah and Jeremiah, Daniel, Hosea, Micah ,Baruch, Ezra, Joel, Zephaniah, all of the Prophets.
Finally, Let's just keep it basic, you're essentially saying that the MOST HIGH was not able to save Israel so much so that they were entirely replaced by the people who were prophesied to seek the light…don't you realize that you are ignoring Jeremiah 30, 31,32 and 33? To prop up this Ultra Grace Doctrine?
Another inspired episode!
Hi @elobeatlesforever, thanks for watching and for your kind words!
@@revelationsingrace Gr8 book, gr8 podcast and gr8 articles! Now that's a trinity I can accept!
@@elobeatlesforever Thank you so much! The true Trinity gets all the glory.
13:00 from what I remember reading, the voice saying let us remove hence was heard coming from the temple… and that was from Tacitus and josephus that recorded it. I don’t think that was the resurrection.
Hi @volleyblogSOCAL, thanks for watching! It's not clear whether Tacitus and Josephus were recording the same event. Because Tacitus records the temple doors opening and the voice of one mortal tone crying out and a rushing noise of their departure seemingly at the same time. Josephus also records these two events, the temple doors opening by themselves and this mighty voice heard around the temple, but he separates those two events by 40 days or more. So they could be describing the same event and disregarding the time, or describing separate events.
If the event from Josephus wasn't the resurrection, what do you think it was? Is there another event that would better describe the resurrection?
It actually sounds a lot like the first resurrection.. because it sounds like it happens at the destruction of the temple and a judgment was issued on those that persecuted the saints and had chosen the mark of beast rather than the mark of Christ.
And the second resurrection (I know the Bible doesn’t say the words second resurrection, but is it implied?)is still to come, which will occur at the great white throne judgment after the Gog and Magog “war” in revelation 20.
Do you believe that Gog and Magog already happened? And great white throne judgment?
What does the second resurrection mean to you if you think that when we die we go to heaven? … I’m asking because this is all so confusing
The argument about NDEs makes a lot of sense, but what about the second resurrection? I thought that doesn’t occur
@@revelationsingraceI reread rev 14 and it does sound like a resurrection of the martyred saints and carrying out of judgment for those that took the mark…
But rev 20 makes it kinda confusing because it speaks of a first resurrection and who will take part in that resurrection but no mention of a second resurrection, only a second death.
But I remember somewhere in the Bible mention of a result the just and unjust, and maybe that is the second resurrection?
I felt like the first resurrection was for the special people who went through the great Trib and were martyred for Christ and future Christians sake… had they gave up Christ, we might not even have Bible… or a religion of Christianity.. and they reigned with Christ for 1000 years as a reward.
I could be wrong, but it seems like the first resurrection was quite specific in rev 20
Hi @@volleyblogSOCAL, great questions, thank you for allowing me the opportunity to answer them.
I have 3 articles, that I hope should answer them. Would you be willing to read them and let me know if they satisfactorily answer your questions?
revelationsingrace.com/articles/christs-ascension-began-the-millennium/
revelationsingrace.com/articles/the-forty-year-millennium/
revelationsingrace.com/articles/timing-the-millenniums-end/
Concerning Gog and Magog:
revelationsingrace.com/articles/gog-and-magog/
Let me know if these help or if there's anything else I can answer :)
@@revelationsingrace I have another question.. in revelation it says death and hades will be thrown into the lake of fire… that would mean that there is no more hell… right? But people have NDE of hell also… I’m trying to figure out where you think we are. Are you a full preterist?
My opinion, appears people misunderstanding of death. All mankind in Adam were apart from the life connection to God not the eventual biological death. Prior to Jesus redemptive work none could be in God's Holy Presence. Now men in spirit can experience God seated now in heavenly places in Christ. The new spiritual body comes immediately after biological death.
Hi @garychampagne1734, well said!
look your off on this! its Israel only that's promised resurrection members of the body of christ the moment we die we receive our new heavenly / celestial bodies and we live in heaven with the angels
2Corinthians 5:1-3 n.l.t
1For we know that when this earthly tent we live in is taken down (that is, when we die and leave this earthly body), we will have a house in heaven, an eternal body made for us by God himself and not by human hands. 2We grow weary in our present bodies, and we long to put on our heavenly bodies like new clothing. 3For we will put on heavenly bodies; we will not be spirits without bodies.
its Israel that's awaiting resurrection not us the body of Christ we will not be spirits without bodies, and when we die we get our new heavenly bodies we never get resurrected like Israel that's why in 2tim 2:15 we are commanded to RIGHTLY ''DIVIDE'' THE TRUTH!!!! which your not doing !!! the resurrection of the just happens at the 2nd coming then 1000 years later the unjust is resurrected to face judgment ( the great white throne of Judgment) the just that is resurrected into the kingdom at the start of the 1000 year kingdom is believing Israel before atonement took place , let me give you a few names of the just that awaiting resurrection , John the Baptist Israelite died before atonement occurred is one of the ''just'' king david is one , Danial, is one etc then the body was revealed through Paul after his conversion in acts 9+ members of the body are the ones promised heaven and new heavenly bodies , so Paul Barnabas, timothy , you me , etc !!! again rightly divide the truth and all your errors will vanish !!
Israel according to the new covenant created by Jesus, defines the new Israel as those who believe in Jesus. When Jesus resurrected, bodies rose from their graves and were witnessed in Jerusalem.
@@bonnenaturel6688 yea there's several resurrections in the bible and they must be rightly divided ! there's the one you speak of that happened at the cross there's one in the rapture of the little flock of believing Israel before the body of Christ (acts2-7) then there's the Just at the start of the 1000 year kingdom then there's the one 1000 years later for the unjust , then there's one that happens at the end with the new heavens and earth !! the body of christ has no part in any of them we directly upon death get new heavenly bodies and we live in heaven not on the earth like Israel !
2Corinthians 5:1-3
1For we know that when this earthly tent we live in is taken down (that is, when we die and leave this earthly body), we will have a house in heaven, an eternal body made for us by God himself and not by human hands. 2We grow weary in our present bodies, and we long to put on our heavenly bodies like new clothing. 3For we will put on heavenly bodies; we will not be spirits without bodies.
you first need to divide between Israel and the body of christ , we are the body of christ not israel , we are the body of christ revealed through Paul after acts 9
in the body there's neither jew or gentile but one new man but before the body gentiles and Israel were as separate as could be and the body didnt begin until after Paul's conversion in acts 9
Ephesians 2:11-12
11Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; 12That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
Matthew 10:5-6
5These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Matt 15 :24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Hi @wolfwatchers, thanks for watching! I'll try to address your questions and concerns if I'm understanding you correctly.
In the New Covenant, Gentiles were grafted into Israel and those in Israel who rejected their Messiah were cut off from being Israel (Romans 9:6-8; 11:17-18). Israel no longer consists of exclusive Jewish blood but rather anyone Jews and Gentiles alike who put their faith in Jesus (Matthew 3:9; Galatians 3:29). There are not two separate plans of redemption but one plan for God's people, the New Spiritual Israel by Faith. I list several verses supporting this in the following article:
revelationsingrace.com/articles/jerusalem-the-prostitute/
That being said, just like the Old Covenant practice of first-fruits and remaining harvest, Revelation only describes two corporate resurrections, one at the beginning of the Millennium and the other at its end.
In the next video and in the following article, I'll be talking about how Jesus' resurrection was the first-fruits and those saints who rose with him in Matthew 27 began the Millennium. I concur with you in that these mostly consisted of believing Jewish martyrs from Israels' history, since they lived in a time when Jews by blood were God's exclusive people.
revelationsingrace.com/articles/christs-ascension-began-the-millennium/
The last resurrection was promised to occur soon from the perspective of Christians living in the first century after the cross, and I believe this happened in 66AD, when Christ returned.
revelationsingrace.com/articles/the-millenniums-soon-end/
revelationsingrace.com/articles/the-forty-year-millennium/
revelationsingrace.com/articles/timing-the-millenniums-end/
If you watch my video on the "Wait in Hades", you'll notice that Gentiles, just like the Jews, went to Sheol in the Old Testament, and therefore they needed a resurrection just like the Jews did.
ruclips.net/video/VP3a-8auPag/видео.html
Does that address your questions?
@@bcamp4light241 we are not, never been, never will be Israel ! we are fellow heirs, and in the family but we are not israel !
Ephesians 2:11-12
11Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; 12That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
Romans 11:11
I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.
the fall of Israel brought salvation to the gentiles , you know your a gentile right!!!!!!!
if your Israel! you guys fell and are given over to blindness until the fullness of the gentiles come in !!
Romans 11:25
For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
@@revelationsingrace I think the issue is your calling the body of Christ Israel , and although we are fellow heirs its only in the body thats true before the body we are not fellow heirs , in the body there's no such thing as Israel or gentiles its a NEW MAN/ CREATURE where there's neither Israel or gentiles !!! Israels fall is what brought about the body of christ (rom 11:11 rom 11:25) and yes every person before atonement of christ went to sheol ( the grave) the just like (John the baptist) and the unjust like the non repentant pharisees
but atonment changed everything it made the body of christ and a way to get to heaven , the body of christ goes directly to heaven in our new bodies when we die we will never be resurrected !!
2Corinthians 5:1-3 (N.L.T)
1For we know that when this earthly tent we live in is taken down (that is, when we die and leave this earthly body), we will have a house in heaven, an eternal body made for us by God himself and not by human hands. 2We grow weary in our present bodies, and we long to put on our heavenly bodies like new clothing. 3For we will put on heavenly bodies; we will not be spirits without bodies.
Philippians 3:20
But we are citizens of heaven, where the Lord Jesus Christ lives.
we will not be spirits with out bodies like the un just and just are awaiting resurrection every unbeliever through all time will be part of the end of the 1000 year resurrection! but the just before atonement will be resurrected at the start of the 1000 years and the body of christ goes directly to heaven upon death ! you cant mix the 3 different fates one for the ''just'' before atonement, one for the unjust and we the body of Christ we go to heaven at death !!!