I got my first gig taking pictures of a house in Real Estate. They told me my pictures need to be brighter so I bought the flash you suggested and I will retake tomorrow. hopefully it works. They did say my pictures were good and would like to use me in the future! I'm a little excited! I would like to see your complete process on an interior shoot for Real Estate.
First off...Congrats! That's awesome! For real estate I have not shot flash in probably 9yrs. I like flash, but there is too much un-natural light and shadows in the shot. I really need to finish my course I'm creating, but in a nutshell shoot multiple brackets. Make sure all lights are on and ceiling fans are off. For the multiple brackets I shoot 0, -2, +2. Do a touch screen trigger and all three will shoot consecutively. I'll merge them in Lightroom and then use that file to bring up shadows, drop highlights. I'll also shoot another photo to expose for the windows and then photoshop in post so you can see out the windows clearly. There is a process and its second nature to me since I have been doing it for 11yrs. Your comment may just be the comment that kicks my butt into gear to finish my course, which also entails how to get business as well.
I am dabbling in video for my grizzly bears and occasional travel pictures - for fun. Thanks - this is helpful to remind me that i) I am already better off at 10bit vs 8bit, ii) using a profile means less nd's since it lowers the iso and just less thinking about iso's, iii) profiles require less processing (colour grading) [and I can trim with a very simple editor], iv) downsampled fine is already better than getting complicated. Grizzlies are constantly moving (and dangerous) and I like to switch quickly from stills to video (while not being eaten). And then I get back to the daunting colour grading and trimming. So this reminds me - it's better to have something easy with less processing and downsampled fine. Thank you.
My question is - I intend to use c3 (default for hitting red record button ) as 4ku fine, 30fps,1/60s, safety shutter (to not blow out in stronger light), c2 for 4k 60fps (slow motion), and c1 for 120fps (super slow motion). What do you suggest for video mode for best quality on 60fps and 120fps for grizzlies (slow moving in dark light at dusk and dawn).
That's a tough one. If you card is fast enough You may want to shoot 8k 60, but if you don't want it baked in the do 8k 60 RAW light would be good enough. You will probably have to clean it up a little in post because of the low light noise, but this would give you the option of cropping into 4k later if you wanted to when shooting 8k.
@@JaredHoyman Thanks. I did not think about punching in to 4k (cropping). That would be a new dimension to my dabbling (processing beyond trimming). Maybe next step after proficiency at 4k uncropped, but a good idea. After seeing your 60v120v240 I think my default slow mo will be 4k/120.
Nice video. Having just got the r5 ii after switching from Sony, I've been having trouble with clog 2 (im probably doing something wrong) but cant seem to get good results with luts to convert the footage (certainly trickier than slog etc). The standard picture profiles may be a good crutch for me until I get more familiarised. Also any hints on how you are editing/applying LUTs to your Clog2?
Here is a video where I touch on how I grad it on my end. Let me know if this helps. I use DaVinci Resolve. ruclips.net/video/ruZVJtiJ5sc/видео.htmlsi=H8gRRU-KuUF0BIl9
It's nice, I suppose it would survive conversion to 8 bit better, as it's likely gonna be 8 bit in the end. Canons used to have an in-camera WideDR profile which would likely have better DR then standard picture profiles. I recorded Prolost Flat on Canon's for years . In Sony land, Sony phones and Cameras have s-Cinetone profile which is 11.5 stops of DR, you expose at 0 exposure and if you like what you see on your screen then you are golden. It can be recorded at 8 or 10 bit and it's a straight out of camera profile. Can you turn on your D+2 Highlight tone Priority for more DR, that might limit you to 200 ISO min. Do you have options for 10Bit 420? I find that 420 is less taxing on the Computer and near identical
Hopefully canon includes this in future cameras like the r6 iii. It would be amazing if they did a firmware upgrade to include it in the r6 II but I wouldn’t count on it.
@@phill5917 it’s been dropping. Keep your eye out around 5am the Friday after thanksgiving on the canon U.S.A. refurbished site. They had insane deals last year. They may have stuff even before then.
One of the things that Canon always got very right was their out of the box standard profile colors. Long before log was a thing it’s what Canon was really l own for. Log is a nice tool but it’s far from a must. I feel like a lot of people just default to log because it’s what everyone suggests these days. If one likes the look and colors out of the box however shooting standard or natural is a solid way to go with no farting around. Log has been a curse as much as a blessing. It leaves the look too much in the hands of each person. Some may like that but then others then go hunting for canned solutions to fix the log and make it once again look normal. Dynamic range is great but rec709 was does really designed to display 15 stops of range. We have to use a very fake looking extreme s curve to cram those extra stops into a very tiny space which ends up making everything look dull and flat. You cannot have realistic contrast and 15 stops of range with rec709. One other option I really like on Canon cameras is their HDR PQ video mode. HDR PQ allows us to have that realistic contrast and keep a lot of the dynamic range. Canon’s implementation does clip some of the highlight potential so it’s far from perfect but it’s a great option straight out of camera for something more like a standard profile that keeps more of the range. Oh one little fun fact. All movies we consider classics from the 80’s that were shot on 35mm film only had about 8 stops of range. They had very little highlight range. Film eventually got better but high dynamic range was not always the norm. Hollywood had about 8 stops just like these standard profiles do. Film stocks also have a very baked in look. So there is nothing wrong with a baked in look. Hollywood did it for many decades.
I completely agree! As the digital age grew so did censor technology and with that endless options. As cool as the tech is, the art of shooting and story telling got lost.
@@JaredHoymanCanon has the really cool ability to load custom picture profiles as well which can be used to apply a unique film stock look to jpegs or video. It doesn’t provide film grain, halation and other film attributes but it’s a way to shoot standard video with a custom baked in look. Sort of like choosing a film stock. A black pro must filter can add some of that halation around highlights and help tone down the hard clipping as well. If one just wants a certain look and knows how to expose properly then it beats shooting log. You can see exactly the look as you shoot. Then if desired add in film grain later and that’s it. I personally think it’s odd to shoot clean high quality video just to add in grain later. The thing even Hollywood has been trying to get rid of since the 1950’s. Now since I shoot raw this likely would never benefit me. You can however shoot raw video as a standard profile. It doesn’t have to be log. If you think 10bit standard video is nice try out 12bit 4:4:4 raw video as standard profile. Kind of overkill but it’s pretty much near perfect image. Plus the raw has some ability left to adjust ISO and white balance if one shot incorrectly. It’s standard with a bit more flexibility.
@@digitaldevigner4080 This camera offers so much. I have dabbled a little with the RAW in standard mode, which I will probably play with more knowing I can probably expose my shots more accurately. I LOVE the 12bit colors the R5II offers.
This is exactly what I’ve been waiting for!! I volunteer at a shelter doing short videos. I have no desire to learn FCP in depth. THANK-you!
This is perfect then. You could up saturation in post to bring more life to it otherwise out of camera is great.
@@JaredHoyman I love it…thank-you👍👍
Great! I was hoping you would review the menu settings. Thank you!
I’ll have to do a menu setting vid down the line.
I got my first gig taking pictures of a house in Real Estate. They told me my pictures need to be brighter so I bought the flash you suggested and I will retake tomorrow. hopefully it works. They did say my pictures were good and would like to use me in the future! I'm a little excited! I would like to see your complete process on an interior shoot for Real Estate.
First off...Congrats! That's awesome! For real estate I have not shot flash in probably 9yrs. I like flash, but there is too much un-natural light and shadows in the shot. I really need to finish my course I'm creating, but in a nutshell shoot multiple brackets. Make sure all lights are on and ceiling fans are off. For the multiple brackets I shoot 0, -2, +2. Do a touch screen trigger and all three will shoot consecutively. I'll merge them in Lightroom and then use that file to bring up shadows, drop highlights. I'll also shoot another photo to expose for the windows and then photoshop in post so you can see out the windows clearly. There is a process and its second nature to me since I have been doing it for 11yrs. Your comment may just be the comment that kicks my butt into gear to finish my course, which also entails how to get business as well.
@JaredHoyman Oh, a course would be awesome! I am a super beginner, I have no idea how to shoot multiple brackets... maybe a video on that? 😆 🤣
@@The_WarL0rd_Way I could do that.
I am dabbling in video for my grizzly bears and occasional travel pictures - for fun. Thanks - this is helpful to remind me that i) I am already better off at 10bit vs 8bit, ii) using a profile means less nd's since it lowers the iso and just less thinking about iso's, iii) profiles require less processing (colour grading) [and I can trim with a very simple editor], iv) downsampled fine is already better than getting complicated. Grizzlies are constantly moving (and dangerous) and I like to switch quickly from stills to video (while not being eaten). And then I get back to the daunting colour grading and trimming. So this reminds me - it's better to have something easy with less processing and downsampled fine. Thank you.
My question is - I intend to use c3 (default for hitting red record button ) as 4ku fine, 30fps,1/60s, safety shutter (to not blow out in stronger light), c2 for 4k 60fps (slow motion), and c1 for 120fps (super slow motion). What do you suggest for video mode for best quality on 60fps and 120fps for grizzlies (slow moving in dark light at dusk and dawn).
That's a tough one. If you card is fast enough You may want to shoot 8k 60, but if you don't want it baked in the do 8k 60 RAW light would be good enough. You will probably have to clean it up a little in post because of the low light noise, but this would give you the option of cropping into 4k later if you wanted to when shooting 8k.
@@JaredHoyman Thanks. I did not think about punching in to 4k (cropping). That would be a new dimension to my dabbling (processing beyond trimming). Maybe next step after proficiency at 4k uncropped, but a good idea. After seeing your 60v120v240 I think my default slow mo will be 4k/120.
Love the sharpness of your video! Looks beautiful! What is your shutter speed at?
Thank you for watching. Shutter was 1/50th. 24fps.
Nice video. Having just got the r5 ii after switching from Sony, I've been having trouble with clog 2 (im probably doing something wrong) but cant seem to get good results with luts to convert the footage (certainly trickier than slog etc). The standard picture profiles may be a good crutch for me until I get more familiarised. Also any hints on how you are editing/applying LUTs to your Clog2?
Here is a video where I touch on how I grad it on my end. Let me know if this helps. I use DaVinci Resolve. ruclips.net/video/ruZVJtiJ5sc/видео.htmlsi=H8gRRU-KuUF0BIl9
@@JaredHoyman thank you 🙏
It's nice, I suppose it would survive conversion to 8 bit better, as it's likely gonna be 8 bit in the end. Canons used to have an in-camera WideDR profile which would likely have better DR then standard picture profiles. I recorded Prolost Flat on Canon's for years . In Sony land, Sony phones and Cameras have s-Cinetone profile which is 11.5 stops of DR, you expose at 0 exposure and if you like what you see on your screen then you are golden. It can be recorded at 8 or 10 bit and it's a straight out of camera profile. Can you turn on your D+2 Highlight tone Priority for more DR, that might limit you to 200 ISO min. Do you have options for 10Bit 420? I find that 420 is less taxing on the Computer and near identical
You can turn it down and tweak your profiles. I haven't yet, but that is a good idea.
I do see that setting HDR mode.. I wonder how it would work
4:2:2 is marginal compared to h264 versus h265
The video I was looking for. Canon needs to give the R6 II 10-bit in standard mode. Stop with the cripple 🔨
Hopefully canon includes this in future cameras like the r6 iii. It would be amazing if they did a firmware upgrade to include it in the r6 II but I wouldn’t count on it.
If you shoot in HDR-PQ isn’t it 10 bit?
Expensive setup! lol
If I wasn't a fulltime photographer/videographer I wouldn't own most of this. But.....it's such a great excuse.
@@JaredHoyman Indeed it is. I plan to get back into photography soon and may go with the R5. Just wish the price would go down below 2K.
@@phill5917 it’s been dropping. Keep your eye out around 5am the Friday after thanksgiving on the canon U.S.A. refurbished site. They had insane deals last year. They may have stuff even before then.
One of the things that Canon always got very right was their out of the box standard profile colors. Long before log was a thing it’s what Canon was really l own for.
Log is a nice tool but it’s far from a must. I feel like a lot of people just default to log because it’s what everyone suggests these days. If one likes the look and colors out of the box however shooting standard or natural is a solid way to go with no farting around.
Log has been a curse as much as a blessing. It leaves the look too much in the hands of each person. Some may like that but then others then go hunting for canned solutions to fix the log and make it once again look normal.
Dynamic range is great but rec709 was does really designed to display 15 stops of range. We have to use a very fake looking extreme s curve to cram those extra stops into a very tiny space which ends up making everything look dull and flat. You cannot have realistic contrast and 15 stops of range with rec709.
One other option I really like on Canon cameras is their HDR PQ video mode. HDR PQ allows us to have that realistic contrast and keep a lot of the dynamic range. Canon’s implementation does clip some of the highlight potential so it’s far from perfect but it’s a great option straight out of camera for something more like a standard profile that keeps more of the range.
Oh one little fun fact. All movies we consider classics from the 80’s that were shot on 35mm film only had about 8 stops of range. They had very little highlight range. Film eventually got better but high dynamic range was not always the norm. Hollywood had about 8 stops just like these standard profiles do. Film stocks also have a very baked in look. So there is nothing wrong with a baked in look. Hollywood did it for many decades.
I completely agree! As the digital age grew so did censor technology and with that endless options. As cool as the tech is, the art of shooting and story telling got lost.
@@JaredHoymanCanon has the really cool ability to load custom picture profiles as well which can be used to apply a unique film stock look to jpegs or video. It doesn’t provide film grain, halation and other film attributes but it’s a way to shoot standard video with a custom baked in look. Sort of like choosing a film stock.
A black pro must filter can add some of that halation around highlights and help tone down the hard clipping as well.
If one just wants a certain look and knows how to expose properly then it beats shooting log. You can see exactly the look as you shoot. Then if desired add in film grain later and that’s it.
I personally think it’s odd to shoot clean high quality video just to add in grain later. The thing even Hollywood has been trying to get rid of since the 1950’s.
Now since I shoot raw this likely would never benefit me. You can however shoot raw video as a standard profile. It doesn’t have to be log. If you think 10bit standard video is nice try out 12bit 4:4:4 raw video as standard profile. Kind of overkill but it’s pretty much near perfect image. Plus the raw has some ability left to adjust ISO and white balance if one shot incorrectly. It’s standard with a bit more flexibility.
@@digitaldevigner4080 This camera offers so much. I have dabbled a little with the RAW in standard mode, which I will probably play with more knowing I can probably expose my shots more accurately. I LOVE the 12bit colors the R5II offers.
@@digitaldevigner4080 I was also going to mention I used to load CINESTYLE on my older canons in the profile. That could be interesting on a R5 II.
IBIS wobble at 4:20 is real
@@armandsaav that was at 24mm. Two hands or gimble you won’t see it like that at 24mm but vlog one handed it’s there.
I had to look again. The jello isn’t there compared to the r6ii and r5.
Is this only Canon camera that can do this?
@@mambiproductions8960 I have never owned the r5 so I’m not sure. The R6 series cameras cannot do this. The r5 II is the only one I’m aware of.
What is long gop?
It’s a video compression format. It group multiple frames together and will compress them. Help file size stay low while maintaining quality.
Try the 240fps 10bit WOW
Good idea!
Rodriguez Karen Jones Ronald Clark Paul
Jared. Big fan of your channel. But dude, the first 4:26 minutes of this was nonsense rambling that just didn’t need to be there.
Jared's nonsense rambling is what makes this channel fun to watch.
Sometimes you have to eat your vegetables to enjoy the dessert. 😅
@@JaredHoymanwell I guess people seem to like it. I believe in democracy so I have to go along with