I always say, flawless Roger Federer is the best version of tennis player ever. Novak Djokovic maintained high level due to his unerring habits but Federer with all guns firing is just the bestest in the universe.
The biggest thing that sets Federer part is when he’s playing his best and when his opponents are playing their best, it’s almost impossible to understand how he can still demolish them. When all things are firing correctly, he is unbeatable, I will stand by that for the rest of my life; Djokovic and Nadal make players feel like they just can’t get a ball past them. Federer makes players feel helpless. It’s absolutely 🤩
Djokovic is the most successful tennis player of all time. Without any whisker of doubt. Most solid, clutch, the mentally toughest one. But the greatest tennis player of all time is Roger Federer. That is just as indubitable. The GOAT debate cannot be purely about numbers. That’s like saying the greatest actor is the one whose films have made the most money. That’s nonsense. Greatness is about beauty, about impact, about breaking new ground, about achieving mastery. Anyone who really sees tennis with clear eyes and an open mind can see that Federer is the greatest artist the sport of tennis has ever seen.
yes, Djokovic is about longevity and consistency, allow ing him to statpad half of his Slam in the weak era in his 30´s. Federer´s peak is something else, Djokovic is better only on slow hard
The prime of mister 40-15 ended when Nadal and Djokovic started beating him. Mr 40-15 didn't actually start weakening but two rivals appeared who simply started beating him.
That's why they slowing courts in important tournaments. Federer was invincible in fast surfaces. this is the perfect example! peak Djokovic couldn't do anything against 34 years old grandpa
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 No it's not. 2017 was definitely faster. Your eyes is not a good source. All the players and commentators in 2017 were saying it was faster than the previous year. I trust them more than your "eyes"
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 It was pretty big. We got Federer/Nadal and Serena/Venus finals after years. Djokovic and Murray lost early. Mischa Zverev serve and volleyed his way to the QF. That would never have happened in 2016
roger truly had amazing ability and talent while many others are very good at simply running back and forth along the baseline roger floated around the court using drop shots and volleys/half volleys i am happy to have seen him play from beginning until retirement a very special player
The best in the history of tennis one thing made me angry why he have fun more then want to win titles federer if he play for numbers i totally sure that he have 30 grandslam maybe not in the Clay because rafa is a beast there
This is just a tease of how good can Federer performance in such a fast court. Shame on ATP they slowed down all courts in the whole tour last 20 years.
Anno 2015, partita bellissima, Djokovic anche vinvcendo, e non ha mai raggiunto un.livello di tennis pari a ROGER, e qui e' stato surclassato dall' immensa classe di Sua Maesta il Re, ROGER FEDERER❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Federer ha perso finali Slam contro il serbo, sprecando macth point, ( vedi ultimo Wimbledon 2019) quindi era piu una questione di testa, e non dimentichiamo che Roger ha 6 anni in.piu, nel suo momento migliore a battuto chiunque ed ha espresso il miglior gioco di tennis di sempre, e questo lo dicono tutti, buonanotte e viva RE ROGER❤❤❤❤
I just love seeing these clips of Federer. Is he maybe in terms of “easy to admire” bigger than eg Messi or further back in the past Ali? I have a feeling that the answer might be “yes”! ❤️🫶🌈
never thought of it that way and ive been a fan for more than 20y. but yeah, i also cant see what they could learn, apart from the experience of playing the best ever
In that game Gasquet was playing & returning shots like an amateur teenager..some shots were so mediocre..amazing..!!..zero inspiration ,nor tactics...
Considering performance and H2H stats Novak and Nadal are in front of Roger. N and N are very strong, powerful machines. Roger, on the other hand is graceful and i think technically more perfect than any other player so far. Wonder why they call him The Maestro ? He can hit almost any shot from any position. And look very relaxed in the meantime. Being The GOAT is a matter of statistics. But the way one is doing it, might be more important.
naive people from Novak fans only care about slam numbers and h2h, they dont know how to dive deeper in statistics. Roger and Rafa both have their unique playing styles like on grass and clay, Novak doesnt since he's just relying on physical (rallying as long as I could), no one wants to watch that. People prefer unexpected shots like how Roger plays his game.
Federer god mode only exists when the other player plays like shit. Like djokovic in that dubai finale. Strange how federer never had any god mode against nadal at Roland garros 😂
Novak is the strongest ever.Roger is the greatest.Nobody has been the world no.1 for 273?consecutive weeks.Roger was pretty much always loved.His game is elegant and entertaining than Novak's.Novak has better records by numbers,has more slams,but also has a lot of numbers for destroying rackets.😂
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 most loved?😂you make me laugh.and by the way I never said Novak was worse or anything.Novak is better than Roger by the numbers.He beat Roger more times than Roger did.But he wasn't the man who changed tennis.Doesn't have the style,the elegance that suits "The Greatest" spot.Novak is The Strongest for me.Not the greatest.The scariest is Nadal btw.Greatest PRIME player is Novak.
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803Tennis is an exciting game but you reduce it by your emphasis on statistics .I prefer to see a video of Roger playing immaculate tennis to watching Novak live and tennis fans agree with me .
Fed faded after novak/nadal got going he didn't evolve his sqaush game and when u watch fed he didn't think when he played..Seems his mind was on his pagaentry status with all the armchair tennis fans drinking the marketing koolaid
That was ridiculous! Very Best Regards, Tom Scott Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System _Our American Injustice System_ _Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
@@tobiaskluke7094 no- Nadal only had the Roland Garros-- and remember - RF was many times in the final - so; without Nadal- he would have like 25/26 Masters....only on Clay Rafa hat that ruling over him...not on gras, and certainly not on hard....
Well… what can I say? Roger lost the Wimbledon final 2008 to Rafa and 6 months later the Australian Open final again to Rafa when he burst into tears. He lost to Rafa again at the Australian Open in the semis in 2012 and 2014, so that is 3 times at the AO alone. Roger also lost in Dubai, Indian Wells and Cincinnati against Nadal. think you should review the H2H history. Altogether, 9 of 24 wins from Rafa over Roger were on hard courts
EXPLAIN TO ME THIS, Even though federer is technically better than djokovic and nadal, why have they won most of H2H in grandslam, escpecially djokovic, even in federer favourite surface
@@nunoteixeira6884 how did u get so cute? all u got is "try english"!! typical ,unable to focus on the tennis players just like fed who had no real focus when it counted
You know what would have been impressive. Actually winning slams that year. Guess who did that? Djokovic. Oh well he only won because Federer was old. Yet in this video you can clearly see how good Federer was in 2015. So why didn't he win a slam that year. Oh yeah Djokovic was better.
Roger was just unlucky that it was Novak's comeback prime in 2015. But he beat Novak on several occasions too and that was not Roger's prime including the iconic french open 2011 SF, novak had 4 days off lol.
roger is over rated he got the goldilocks era 2003-2009 after when nadal/djoki got going Feds sqaush game wilted just like his weak backhand and weak mental strength..Fedsqaush only won 33% of his GS matches agaisnt nadal/djoki and SAme in GS finals only winning 33% again his 2 rivals novak/nadal..Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed to joki 3 times in a row at Wimbledon fianls on his supposed BEST SURFACE!!?? 50% of fedsqaush titles were on the B circuit 250/500..Fed did sell more running shoes
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
I always say, flawless Roger Federer is the best version of tennis player ever. Novak Djokovic maintained high level due to his unerring habits but Federer with all guns firing is just the bestest in the universe.
The most valid opinion ever
Yes. a peak Federer is better than a peak Novak whose biggest advantage was consistency.
The biggest thing that sets Federer part is when he’s playing his best and when his opponents are playing their best, it’s almost impossible to understand how he can still demolish them. When all things are firing correctly, he is unbeatable, I will stand by that for the rest of my life; Djokovic and Nadal make players feel like they just can’t get a ball past them. Federer makes players feel helpless. It’s absolutely 🤩
Fedal fans coping is just sad, peak novak is better cause hes the GOAT
@@anonusniogsonisrgnip peak Djoker < peak Federer. Total domination for 237 consecutive weeks.
The first Set against Verdasco is terrifying.
Quite insane!!! Those backhands against Djokovic omg
He certainly took a leaf of wawrinkas book with those fiery backhands down the line
20 points in a row, seriously 🤯🤯🤯
Federer's hitting was deadly dangerous because of its pace and angle-variation. Nobody ever reaches his insane level, even today Alcaraz.
Bro he almost made a GOLDEN SET against Verdasco 😂
he already did one vs djoko
@@Rinckon1 I dont see it wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_set
@@Rinckon1 No. Golden set means 24 points to 0. 6-0 doesn't mean necesseraly golden set.
@@Rinckon1 thats a bagel, 6-0. Golden set would mean 6-0 but not loosing a single rally
lethal and entertaining. Fed in overdrive!
13:41 at full volume: GAME!!!!!! FEDERER!!!!
GOAT
Djokovic is the most successful tennis player of all time. Without any whisker of doubt. Most solid, clutch, the mentally toughest one.
But the greatest tennis player of all time is Roger Federer. That is just as indubitable.
The GOAT debate cannot be purely about numbers. That’s like saying the greatest actor is the one whose films have made the most money. That’s nonsense. Greatness is about beauty, about impact, about breaking new ground, about achieving mastery.
Anyone who really sees tennis with clear eyes and an open mind can see that Federer is the greatest artist the sport of tennis has ever seen.
yes, Djokovic is about longevity and consistency, allow ing him to statpad half of his Slam in the weak era in his 30´s. Federer´s peak is something else, Djokovic is better only on slow hard
And there's a few people who think Bathroombreakovic is the GOAT when he got absolutely spanked during his peak here 😂😂😂
And Djokovic beat mr 40-15 in Indian wells and Wimbledon the same year😂
@@prempititantipool3075and? Fed was about 6 years after his prime that year 😂
@@initialize21 Fed prime lasted only 4 years . Prime Novak lasted 10+ years😂 Papa fake gaot
Novak is the goat but prime Federer is better than prime Djokovic
The prime of mister 40-15 ended when Nadal and Djokovic started beating him.
Mr 40-15 didn't actually start weakening but two rivals appeared who simply started beating him.
That's why they slowing courts in important tournaments. Federer was invincible in fast surfaces. this is the perfect example! peak Djokovic couldn't do anything against 34 years old grandpa
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 AO court changed after 2007. Its ok, Roger also beat djoker convicingly on fast court in 2007.
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 You have source for this? 2017 was fast but 2016 doesn't seem that way
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 No it's not. 2017 was definitely faster. Your eyes is not a good source. All the players and commentators in 2017 were saying it was faster than the previous year. I trust them more than your "eyes"
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 It was pretty big. We got Federer/Nadal and Serena/Venus finals after years. Djokovic and Murray lost early. Mischa Zverev serve and volleyed his way to the QF. That would never have happened in 2016
Ah yes lets cherry pick, like Novak wins on wimbledon, atp finals (the fastest hard court in the world) and Dubai 2011 dont count
Absolutely RF The Best In The History ❤
Would have loved to see peak Roger play present peak Carlos 😊
One and only legend and goat Federer
It was right now Djockovici is the Boss
roger truly had amazing ability and talent while many others are very good at simply running back and forth along the baseline roger floated around the court using drop shots and volleys/half volleys i am happy to have seen him play from beginning until retirement a very special player
The best in the history of tennis one thing made me angry why he have fun more then want to win titles federer if he play for numbers i totally sure that he have 30 grandslam maybe not in the Clay because rafa is a beast there
fEDERES IS COME BACK
This is just a tease of how good can Federer performance in such a fast court. Shame on ATP they slowed down all courts in the whole tour last 20 years.
Worst part is theyve been getting sped up post 2019...
Anno 2015, partita bellissima, Djokovic anche vinvcendo, e non ha mai raggiunto un.livello di tennis pari a ROGER, e qui e' stato surclassato dall' immensa classe di Sua Maesta il Re, ROGER FEDERER❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Inigualável Roger federer categoria graças a Deus vi vários jogos desse ícone todos maravilhosos..
Federer ha perso finali Slam contro il serbo, sprecando macth point, ( vedi ultimo Wimbledon 2019) quindi era piu una questione di testa, e non dimentichiamo che Roger ha 6 anni in.piu, nel suo momento migliore a battuto chiunque ed ha espresso il miglior gioco di tennis di sempre, e questo lo dicono tutti, buonanotte e viva RE ROGER❤❤❤❤
I just love seeing these clips of Federer. Is he maybe in terms of “easy to admire” bigger than eg Messi or further back in the past Ali? I have a feeling that the answer might be “yes”! ❤️🫶🌈
If you are having a bad day, just come watch this video....
Didn't change anything
Roger took the ball very early on backhand, creating faster pace that his opponents haven’t got used to
Beauty....But then, Djokovic is also remarkable!!
That screaming harpy in the Verdasco match was unbearable
They say you learn more in a loss than in a win. I don't know what anyone could learn from losing to Federer.
They can learn what God tennis looks like.
never thought of it that way and ive been a fan for more than 20y. but yeah, i also cant see what they could learn, apart from the experience of playing the best ever
20 points in a row is absurd
20 points in a row. As John McEnroe might have said once upon a time: "You cannot be serious"! 💟 Wow!😮
In that game Gasquet was playing & returning shots like an amateur teenager..some shots were so mediocre..amazing..!!..zero inspiration ,nor tactics...
Considering performance and H2H stats Novak and Nadal are in front of Roger. N and N are very strong, powerful machines. Roger, on the other hand is graceful and i think technically more perfect than any other player so far. Wonder why they call him The Maestro ? He can hit almost any shot from any position. And look very relaxed in the meantime. Being The GOAT is a matter of statistics.
But the way one is doing it, might be more important.
naive people from Novak fans only care about slam numbers and h2h, they dont know how to dive deeper in statistics. Roger and Rafa both have their unique playing styles like on grass and clay, Novak doesnt since he's just relying on physical (rallying as long as I could), no one wants to watch that. People prefer unexpected shots like how Roger plays his game.
@@earl8295 Typical Fedtard coping everywhere😂
@@earl8295victory is above these
That's got to be the ugliest trophy I've ever seen... Probably worth a lot though
The lighting on the court sucks.
20 consecutive points ridiculous
That first set turnaround against Verdasco was rather terrifying to watch, LOL.
Novak was a joke when federer turned God mode on.
Yes Novak just joke
When RF was on, he made every player look like an amateur including the supposed "GOAT" Statpadovic
🎉😊❤@@TheGodsMustBeCrazy
@@TheGodsMustBeCrazy the term stat pad doesn't rly work in an individual sport. like wtf is he supposed to do? not win?
Federer god mode only exists when the other player plays like shit. Like djokovic in that dubai finale.
Strange how federer never had any god mode against nadal at Roland garros 😂
Perfection on a tennis court! The true GOAT
Novak is the strongest ever.Roger is the greatest.Nobody has been the world no.1 for 273?consecutive weeks.Roger was pretty much always loved.His game is elegant and entertaining than Novak's.Novak has better records by numbers,has more slams,but also has a lot of numbers for destroying rackets.😂
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 Roger is for me.Novak was never loved as much as him.Also I only started waching tennis in 2022.
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 most loved?😂you make me laugh.and by the way I never said Novak was worse or anything.Novak is better than Roger by the numbers.He beat Roger more times than Roger did.But he wasn't the man who changed tennis.Doesn't have the style,the elegance that suits "The Greatest" spot.Novak is The Strongest for me.Not the greatest.The scariest is Nadal btw.Greatest PRIME player is Novak.
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 You are absurd it is clear that Roger Federer is a far greater player than the Joker or Nadal.
@victormanuelbustamantealva6803Tennis is an exciting game but you reduce it by your emphasis on statistics .I prefer to see a video of Roger playing immaculate tennis to watching Novak live and tennis fans agree with me .
Fed faded after novak/nadal got going he didn't evolve his sqaush game and when u watch fed he didn't think when he played..Seems his mind was on his pagaentry status with all the armchair tennis fans drinking the marketing koolaid
That was ridiculous!
Very Best Regards,
Tom Scott
Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System
_Our American Injustice System_
_Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
your audition for Craig was pretty fire my friend
As far as I can tell, it's not indicated anywhere what year this match took place..!
2015
Hi guys.. What year? Thankyou
nobody could catch up with the Maestro in his prime...and even after that it was very hard for everyone to beat him...GOAT
As much as I love him: Nadal always could. Always led their head to head during their rivalry.
@@tobiaskluke7094 no- Nadal only had the Roland Garros-- and remember - RF was many times in the final - so; without Nadal- he would have like 25/26 Masters....only on Clay Rafa hat that ruling over him...not on gras, and certainly not on hard....
Well… what can I say? Roger lost the Wimbledon final 2008 to Rafa and 6 months later the Australian Open final again to Rafa when he burst into tears. He lost to Rafa again at the Australian Open in the semis in 2012 and 2014, so that is 3 times at the AO alone. Roger also lost in Dubai, Indian Wells and Cincinnati against Nadal. think you should review the H2H history. Altogether, 9 of 24 wins from Rafa over Roger were on hard courts
Post Nike federer was lame
Expertly crafted world
What year was this?
Simply magical!
EXPLAIN TO ME THIS, Even though federer is technically better than djokovic and nadal, why have they won most of H2H in grandslam, escpecially djokovic, even in federer favourite surface
Cuz Federer crumbled mentally against Djokovic.
Cause they are 6 years younger?
Because they are younger. Djokovic played 30+ Federer for a fucking decade. And Nadal won a lot of clay matches.
@@AlexisNess-mn4zw alcaraz is younger than djokovic
@@morad9195 And?
GOAT
good
Fedsqaush had no fight he had a spolied up bringing showed in his sqaush game
try english next time.
@@nunoteixeira6884 how did u get so cute? all u got is "try english"!! typical ,unable to focus on the tennis players just like fed who had no real focus when it counted
You know what would have been impressive. Actually winning slams that year. Guess who did that? Djokovic. Oh well he only won because Federer was old. Yet in this video you can clearly see how good Federer was in 2015. So why didn't he win a slam that year. Oh yeah Djokovic was better.
Guess we’re forgetting who won Indian wells Wimbledon us open and world tour finals (technically the split but novak won what secured the title).
Roger was just unlucky that it was Novak's comeback prime in 2015. But he beat Novak on several occasions too and that was not Roger's prime including the iconic french open 2011 SF, novak had 4 days off lol.
@@earl82952011 rg wasn't federer's prime? He must have been 29. 28-31 are the peak years for caucasians.
But later is Novak Djokovic was king of this sport.
roger is over rated he got the goldilocks era 2003-2009 after when nadal/djoki got going Feds sqaush game wilted just like his weak backhand and weak mental strength..Fedsqaush only won 33% of his GS matches agaisnt nadal/djoki and SAme in GS finals only winning 33% again his 2 rivals novak/nadal..Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed to joki 3 times in a row at Wimbledon fianls on his supposed BEST SURFACE!!?? 50% of fedsqaush titles were on the B circuit 250/500..Fed did sell more running shoes
Complete idiocy
@@dexday452 how did u get so cute and ur insight is remarkable
Tell me you are one of those braindead novak fan without telling me.
@@AboraPearl try and focus on the tennis players if u can? Do u own a pair of fed running shoes?
he comments on a video where an old federer crushed peak djokovic lol
Genius