The TRUTH About The Pro-Choice Movement
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- Watch the full Real Talk with Zuby podcast ft. Lila Rose here:
• Lila Rose - The Future...
In their conversation, Zuby and Lila Rose discuss the challenging and often avoided topic of abortion. They acknowledge the heaviness of the subject and the societal reluctance to engage in open dialogue about it. Lila shares her personal experiences advocating for the pro-life movement and emphasizes the importance of remembering the voiceless victims, the unborn children. She critiques the societal narrative that equates abortion with empowerment for women, arguing that it distorts the true nature of female empowerment.
Lila reflects on the historical context of infant sacrifice and highlights the need for courage to challenge the prevailing narrative. The conversation explores the pushback faced by both men and women who speak out against abortion, noting the different forms it takes. They conclude by emphasizing the importance of education and the growing number of voices speaking out against the normalization of abortion.
Follow Zuby:
/ zubymusic
/ zubymusic
/ zubymusic
Follow Lila Rose:
/ lilagracerose
Subscribe to the 'Real Talk With Zuby' podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify & more - fanlink.to/zub...
Merch, Music & Books - teamzuby.com
Support Zuby on Patreon - / zubymusic
Support Zuby on Locals - teamzuby.local...
'Strong Advice: Zuby's Guide to Fitness For Everybody' eBook - gumroad.com/l/...
Oh hey a context banner explaining what an abortion is without actually saying what an abortion is.
Right?!?!
It says “removes the pregnancy from the uterus.” That’s grammatically and factually inaccurate. It ends the pregnancy by removing the baby from the uterus.
Yes because we are dumb children who need PC people to know what to think
Obfuscation is the name of the game.
Obviously pro 'choice' source.🤣
How about: 1. Abstinence 2. Birth Control 3. Sobriety
⬆️
But that would mean taking responsibility.
4. Anti horny tabs.
Amen
@GD-zy6sk For sure, but Condoms make a difference as well
Babies need their rights
I had a discussion with my dad many years ago about abortion. He was pro choice but anti abortion. Meaning, he wasn't going to step in anybody's way, but he viewed it as murder. I said to him, dad nobody knows when life actually begins, so we can't say it's murder . He said, you're right, we don't know when life actually begins SO WHY NOT ASSUME IT BEGINS AT CONCEPTION, and that's never left me.
We are talking about human life. We SHOULD assume it begins at conception, because we can't specify when exactly it does begin.
My stance on abortion turned 180 that day.
Even if they come around and understand and agree, they still follow the mindless inertia of abortion. They won’t change course of action…
I am Pro better choices.
I like this. Me too. ✌️
"It's not just A child, its YOUR child." That line should have women in tears. Unfortunately, however, it will have many of them screeching in rage instead.
Stop calling it pro-choice, and call it for what it is, pro-abortion/murder.
Yes it is
I call it anti-consequences.
@@loupchevalier1072 in politics they call it being a politician especially a leftist.
You can't necessarily call it pro-murder if it's defined as "unlawful killing". I prefer to think of it as anti-accountability.
@@onegaisti is murder not the unlawful killing of someone?
Don't get pregnant in the first place
I am against abortion because I like women.
“No uterus, no opinion” is what they always say. So we men voted in the party that promised us a bigger paycheck. Just so happened that that party also wants to take away your rights to an abortion, but then again, no uterus no opinion.
It’s insane to me that they get away with saying men can’t have an opinion on this. The child being killed is equally his child. Of course he has a say on if that baby dies.
@@kurarisusa They didn't exactly "get away with it", it just came back to bite them in the a$$ when it got twisted in ways that they didn't expect, ie. when men started prioritising something else when voting.
To understand Pro Choice, watch Blade Runner 2049.
Regarding abortion , taking no stance is worse than taking any one stance.
Who wants to talk about it? We never talk about it, we just talk about if it is legal or not. We never talk about how abortions are performed and what happens to the baby.
It’s because the truth is so dark and disgusting that it’s hard to look at. We use words like fetus and abortion to obscure the reality of dismembering a young human in what’s supposed to be the safest place for them. Even just acknowledging that their arms and legs are ripped off is so disturbing, we can hardly face it.
Lila Rose’s Live Action channel has a whole series of videos depicting and explaining the various procedures.
I adore the folks who say, "Oh, I would never get one, but I'm still pro-choice." Really? And why would you never get one? Is it, possibly, because you know it's wrong, but you avoid thinking too hard about it because you're too much of a coward to face the backlash from baby killers that you would receive for having the correct morality?
WE THE PEOPLE NEED TO TAKE MORE ACTION. PLEASE CALL YOUR CONGRESS PERSON AND SPEAK YOUR PIECE.
I'm not pro-life. I'm anti-abortion.
Trump is right on this issue though, it's about states rights, the US has had federal enforcement of abortion already(Roe V Wade) and it was horrible, the best Churchillian solution to the issue of abortion already exists, let each individual state decide.
Herein lies the problem: if a State decides abortion is legal, we have a State endorsing and protecting the explicit murder of innocent people.
The role of government is to secure our Rights, the people of a State have declared that Women have a right to abortion, so they institute the State government to secure that right but, clearly, abortion infringes on the Rights of another human so then the Supreme Court must overturn that law using the Supremacy Clause.
He is making a smart political move, but he is not right morally. It is actually similar to what Lincoln did. He ran on the basis of stopping the spread and phasing out slavery. At the time he was making a smart political move, but I don’t think anybody today would argue that the position he originally ran on was “morally right“.
Thank you Zuby
it's murder, how can society condone murder, please stop it.
R u surprised? I believe in Canada there’s a new law for assisted suicide, and I’m like “what” and in the UK you have a well known person trying to advocate for the right to die on her terms basically assisted dying. It’s ridiculous, death seems to be the preferred choice nowadays, not living, and you have people cheering it on as if it’s something good and using stupid words to cover the fact that you are just committing mur@er. People are celebrating death, and saying it’s pro-choice. No matter how you slice it it’s not.
What I find bizarre is this:
Think for a second. How many abortions does one person have in a life time? Maybe one? And even so, it's not a common thing.
Yet, that's THE issue for an entire ideology. You pay taxes every day. You deal with inflation every day. There are unvetted people crossing over into the country every day. Yet this issue is the one we have to walk on egg shells around?
I’ve never understood why women feel they need THIS choice. They had the choice of birth control. Multiple forms of it. They have rights. They just don’t want to use them. The right to kill a fetus should not be one of them.
It's just an excuse to be reckless let's b honest 🤷♂️ without it ALOT of women would have to choose more wisely which I'd argue is a good thing
Only women can get away with calling a do-over their only choice.
The pro choice side can be quite aggressive in how they communicate their views. I think the pro life side needs to take a page from their book and without rudeness or violence aggressively show people the horror that is abortion. Most people have no idea what it actually entails and would be shocked if they did.
They're aggressive because they already know the logic behind the pro life side. Nobody actually believes that a fetus isn't alive, or is a parasitic lump of cells, or isn't human. Those are post hoc rationalizations that fall apart within a few minutes of honest discussion. That's why they can't allow honest discussion.
They really want to support abortion, while shielding themselves from what they're condoning. So, they deflect with rage, chants, and silly legalese.
The long arc of humanity has only bent more and more towards pro life policies and attitudes
Every day is special with me and my bud
We won't be able to have an honest discussion about abortion until abortion supporters admit that it isn't really about healthcare, etc. Just admit that you want to be promiscuous and not have to take accountability and responsibility for it already...
And it’s an upper class thing. Lower classes typically don’t kill their babies. Upper classes do when it’s inconvenient. Like they want to get an Oscar or something.
Abortion needs to be replaced with ease of access to receive voluntary sterilization. I don't care if a woman does or doesn't want to have kids. But that's a choice to be made before a child is growing in her womb. She is no longer a singular entity at that point. We argue about the wrong thing.
The only time abortion should be utilized is when it ISN'T a choice. When it's that or the mother and baby are both going to die.
The complete over reach from an emotional standpoint that "pro-choice" (not an accurate term btw) people apply has always been fascinating and confusing to me. I saw an part of an interview once where a young lady was crying while saying how her mother marched for this "right" back in the day -- the irony was palpable.
👍
So I assume you are anti war, anti second amendment, likely a vegetarian, anti death penalty, or do you pick and choose when death is wrong? What about if the baby is not viable and is threatening the woman's life? Is it okay if she dies?
None of the other issues pertain to abortion. That’s not an argument.
This argument is unconvincing. A baby in the womb is the most innocent and vulnerable human being on the planet. That is very different than protecting yourself from someone who is trying to murder you, like in war or personal self defense.
FIRST
Bro has to tune up his pullout game.
Abortion should be legal 20weeks the limit...
What's the issue? Make abortion legal and let them decide what should be done based on conversations with their doctor. Abortion is a portal to power? People don't say that; that's total bllsht. On the other hand, birth control is absolutely a portal to power. The vast majority of women had very limited control over having kids before "the pill." Also, the only people calling a blastocyst a baby are people who have a limited understanding of biology and/or simply opposed to abortion.
Do you really believe the abortionist is "her doctor"? I've never heard that abortion is a portal to power. However, the idea that women cannot be equal to men so long as they are "forced" to give birth is alive and kicking.
I would call it a human life
20% of all American pregnancies end in abortion
You were saying?
@@hunterkarr5618 It's a human blastocyst, sure, but not a person or even a viable human being.
@@amazingbollweevilit is human and how we all started.