Corrections/Additions/Clarifications: 1. Recent studies suggest that Utahraptor, Gastonia, and the rest of the Yellow Cat fauna may have lived much earlier in the Cretaceous, during the Berriasian and Valinginian ages, about 139-134 mya. 2. While the type species of Utahraptor has been commonly spelled ostrommaysorum, a recent paper has rejected this in favor of the original spelling, ostrommaysi.
I hate their explanation for that fight : "the Utharaptor has plenty of free food on hand if it wanted, but, as that free food is dead meat from carcasses, it gives 50 calories less of energy per kg compared to fresh meat. Soooooo, the Utharaptor will hunt that heavily armored dino covered in spikes and giant pairs of scissors and risk its life with little chances of success for those extra 50 cal/kg." LoGiCaL bEhaViOr !
0:43 I think the title was referring to the last stand of this individual Utahraptor or possibly Utahraptor as a whole rather than dromaeosaurs in general
People who love paleontology: Dromaeosaurs were feathered. Mega Dinosaurs: FEATHERED DINOSAURS ARE NOT COOL Me: FEATHERED DINOSAURS ARE JUST AS COOL AS SCALY ONES
7:43 Probably because it looks more like Deinonychus which leads to two possibilities A. They did it to reuse the Deinonychus model because they're lazy B. They wanted it to resemble The Jurassic Park Velociraptor Design
Gigantism is very rare in nature, and JFC's utahraptor is only slightly bigger than the real animal, so it's likely that it is simply the result of individual variation.
Actually carrion does have less nutritional value as once the carcus decomposes the value of the meat drops but yes you are right as it would be more effective to scavenge over attacking a living opponent.
At least Dinosaur Revolution has a feathered Utahraptor that hunted in the correct method and fought other Utahraptors over a young Cedarsaurus which is just like the mobbing behavior that Komodo dragons have today.
You know what small detail about this episode has always kind of bugged me? The Gastonia's ability to smell water underground. Can animals actually do that, depending on how deep underground the water is? I would think that they would hear the water instead of smelling it.....
Animals can smell water (or at least they can smell things commonly found near water). Whether this applies to water underground I’m not sure, but ankylosaurs are believed to have very active senses of smell, and iirc the narrator says that the water is only a foot deep, so I wouldn’t say it’s that big of a stretch.
Oh yeah I have something to say about the raptor vs t-Rex episode I don’t know why dromeosaurus is always pictured in the maastricbtian, they are teeth from both troodon and dromeosaurus teeth that date to Maastrichtian layers but their existence into that time is questionable still and is up for debate
From what I know, the Maastrichtian Dromaeosaurus teeth are now believed to belong to Acheroraptor, although remains in Prince Creek are still classified as Dromaeosaurus. The Maastrichtian "Troodon" teeth now belong to Pectinodon, as the genus Troodon is no longer valid.
@@PaleoNerd1905 The Prince Creek dromeosaur is undoubtedly not Dromeosaurus, it just hasn't been properly identified yet, given how Dromeosaurus was a Campanian taxon, but much like with the Hell Creek dromeosaurs, this is just a hangover from the 1990s/early 2000s when paleontologists just lumped any North American late Cretaceous small dromeosaur fossil into Dromeosaurus due to a lack of better options. Sufficient to say, the PD dromeosaur is far more likely to be Saurornitholestes, Atrociraptor or an entirely new genus. Basically, whenever you see a Maastrichtian fossil formation list "Dromeosaurus" among its fossil finds, you know that it's an actually an as of yet unidentified raptor carrying a heavily outdated placeholder name.
Good old wastebasket taxonomy, a hangover from the 1990s/early to mid-2000s when paleontologists just lumped any North American late Cretaceous small dromeosaur fossil into Dromeosaurus due to a lack of better options. "Maastrichtian Dromeosaurus" as shown in Walking with Dinosaurus and Jurassic Fight Club are retroactively identified as Archeroraptor. Same exact story with Troodon, the Maastrichtian ones are Pectinodon.
Dalibor Jovanovic Thanks for the info! The Prince Creek dromaeosaur will probably take a while to be named, since iirc all we have from it is teeth. Also, do you know how much we actually have of the Arctic troodont? I remember hearing it was more dromaeosaur-like so I’m guessing we have more than just teeth.
Also, I think the bigger danger of scavenging carcasses as opposed to fresh meat is the chance that the carcass might have parasites or something. I think Planet Dinosaur refers to this as "botulism" or something.
That rarely happens, and it would still be better than trying to take down an animal so heavily armored it’s nearly impossible to kill without risk of injury. Predators always want to avoid injury, because wounds can get infected and/or impede their ability to hunt, which would be fatal. So in a drought like that, it would be better to scavenge.
Fixing JFC: A Gastonia is searching for food in Utah.It doesn't find any plants,but finds a dead Dakotadon with claw marks and teeth marks.It hears a loud screech,and then,a Utahraptor appears. The Utahraptor is watching every step of the Gastonia. The Utahraptor's preys are marched at this time,so it thinked about trying to hunt down thd Gastonia. The Utahraptor is getting close to the Gastonia,but the Gastonia swings it's tail.The Utahraptor screeches at the Gastonia,but the Gastonia swings it's tail,and it hits the Utahraptor,killing it. Months later a group of Cedarosaurses are marching to the formation,and a Cedarosaurus steps on something spiky.....the deac body of the dried out Gastonia.
@@PaleoNerd1905 the "feather" at the back of the head kinda look like the one from JP III(also their raptor design is cooler than the one in the show I think[even if innacurate but I wont complain about the dinosaur of jurassic park because they're basicaly hybrid from the start[frog DNA combine with dinosaur dna,it was explained in the first movie ruclips.net/video/h58lRIVHhGc/видео.html ]) ,will you mentien the way jurassic fight club was edited?
When you mentioned the sauropods that Utahraptor May have hunted if the former were juveniles, what about Sauroposeidon? Did that massive sauropod ever encounter Utahraptor? I know it lived with Acrocanthosaurus and Deinonychus.
L Gaines I think the main Sauropod that Utahraptor probably encountered was Astrodon.
2 года назад
utahraptor lived 126 to 124 MYA, deinonychus, sauroposeidon, acrochantosaurus, tenontosaurus and other lived 10 million years later, SOOOOOOOOO...... no
I noticed you mentioned that the Utahraptor could have just waited for the bite/slash to kill the prey, but would the animal have been intelligent enough to know and understand this? Or would it not have stopped its attacks until the prey stops moving?
Considering how animals nowadays are intelligent enough to use similar tactics when hunting, it's not an unreasonable assumption for the Utahraptor to do the same thing.
Now that's a good question. Come to think of it, it would be really cool to see the JFC doing the calcs that lead to some of their claims as part of the episodes.
I don't believe that thing from jurassic fight club is an uhatraptor and if that's an uhatraptor then that thing from valley of the t-rex is a tyrannosaurus 😨
For Velociraptor in particular, if they were to hold their arm out the hand would supinate like the Utahraptor had done at the beginning at the fight. If the bones of the Utahraptors arm work the same then it should be able to turn the hand like it did.
Good video as always, though I think you would definitely benefit from cutting pieces of your recording where you mess up (only keeping when you repeat it correctly) and cutting the recording before you hear the click that ends the recording. Both of them kind of messed with the flow of the video. Other than that it was still very good and informative.
Paleo Nerd what the heck are you talking about? Most larger Dromaeosaurs reach at a height of 6 or 6.6 ft (2 meters in general) that's the average height for most of these species; unless you are referring to estimations for the hips? If so then at least clarify that in the future with all other dinosaurs, since a total reconstruction of most dinosaurs would require the full total height.
What universe are you from where most dromaeosaurs are 6 feet tall? Velociraptor isn't even 2 feet tall, and Deinonychus was a little over 2 feet in height. The only dromaeosaurs that were close to a height of 6 feet were the giant ones like Utahraptor and Achillobator. I would like to know why you think hip heights would make any difference, since almost all dinosaurs hold their bodies parallel to the ground, so their shoulders and hips would be at roughly the same height anyway.
@@PaleoNerd1905 Perhaps you didn't read it clearly. I said most 'LARGER' dromaeosaurs, jeeves. It's ironic you christen yourself with the title of "Paleo Nerd" when you can't even remember some of the largest of dromaeosaurs such as Austroraptor, Dromaeosauroides (supposedly), Dakotaraptor, and the Wales Velociraptorine. In furthering adding though hip height estimates help it they do not help estimate the dinosaurs full height and shoulder estimates in some dinosaurs are sometimes shorter or longer than the hip and that's not accounting for posture.
@@TheMightyN Ok, you are right that I didn't read that clearly, but because I didn't mention those other dromaeosaurs does not mean I didn't know they existed or forgot about them, so you can lay off on the insults. Btw, Dromaeosauroides is known from two teeth, so we can't really reliably estimate it's size, and the Wales velociraptorine might actually be a proceratosaurid tyrannosauroid, due to how similar their teeth are to dromaeosaurs. I will thank you for clarifying your issue over the difference between the hip height and shoulder height, and I will take that in consideration when making future videos.
Why are raptors in media always never feathered like bruh feathered raptors are cooler and accurate but all they do is put quills and be like you happy now like bruh its like giving a child only 1 chicken nugget out of 10 chicken nuggets they could get instead
It seems that the mass still believe that scaly raptors are cooler and scarier than feathered ones. While this is acceptable in the realm of entertainment. Documentaries should aim for education instead of entertainment.
Can you stop referring the early or late parts of the periods of the mesozoic as separate time periods, and 65 mya is not the end of the cretaceous, 66 mya is, the documentary mentions that common mistake, or are you going to do this in your series wide analysis, and nano from t rex hunter is said to weigh a ton and the triassic is said to last from 225 to 193 mya in the docu
Mentioning the early/late parts of a period of the Mesozoic is very important. Take the Cretaceous for example. The Cretaceous period is the longest of the three Mesozoic periods, and as such, animals that lived at the beginning of the Cretaceous are very different from those that lived at the end. So yeah, it is important what part I’m talking about. I already know about the other stuff, and most of that stuff I mention in other episodes. I list the episode number on each video for the exact reason of letting people know to watch the other episodes. Otherwise you will miss things and complain I didn’t cover or explain stuff when I did just that in another video. As for the 66/65 mya, that will be addressed in either Raptors vs. T. rex or the series wide analysis.
Enzo Ayala The Mesozoic doesn’t have epochs, the Cenozoic does. If you’re talking about stuff like Barremian and Maastrichtian, those are ages, which are different from epochs. I’ll probably make a video soon explaining the geologic time scale and the difference between different subdivisions like ages and epochs.
I was not, I said that because Wikipedia calls the early Triassic, mid Triassic, late Triassic, early Jurassic, mid Jurassic, late Jurassic, early cretaceous and late cretaceous as epochs
@@enzoayala4629 That makes sense. I actually forgot that those are epochs. Still, those count as separate time periods, because epochs, ages, eras, etc. are all different time periods.
6:47 Actually no Utahraptor is now considered to be less feathered rather fully plumaged because the environment in which it lived in was dessert region and fully feathered body would overheat it 😁
@@PaleoNerd1905 Utahraptor is slightly bigger and bigger creatures absorb more heat, so maybe it was NOT fully feathered (which I highly doubt) and Ostriches do lose feathers. But yeah, that's true. So maybe Utahraptor was fully feathered, which is the most likely.
Are these Dinosaurs wrists are broken? Why in every episode the Dinosaurs wrists are moving onward and not inward as they supposed to? By the way, am I an idiot?
Ummmmmmmm...whatttt!! The show called gastonia little while Gastonia is 5 metres long and weight 1ton The show called the thing that longer4metres and weight more than hundred little!!!!!!!! Oh god!!! Are you drunk huh?!?!?!?!
Corrections/Additions/Clarifications:
1. Recent studies suggest that Utahraptor, Gastonia, and the rest of the Yellow Cat fauna may have lived much earlier in the Cretaceous, during the Berriasian and Valinginian ages, about 139-134 mya.
2. While the type species of Utahraptor has been commonly spelled ostrommaysorum, a recent paper has rejected this in favor of the original spelling, ostrommaysi.
Not just Utahraptor, the proposed Berriasian-Valingianian date applies to the whole Yellow Cat Member fauna, including Gastonia.
@@daliborjovanovic510 He did say Gastonia and the rest of the Yellow Cat fauna.
So Utahraptor just got its last name changed.
The JFC's Utahraptor looks literally like the original 1960s/70s Deinonychus reconstruction, especially the head!
It looks like a Muppets character
It looks Robert Downey jr screaming face
I hate their explanation for that fight : "the Utharaptor has plenty of free food on hand if it wanted, but, as that free food is dead meat from carcasses, it gives 50 calories less of energy per kg compared to fresh meat. Soooooo, the Utharaptor will hunt that heavily armored dino covered in spikes and giant pairs of scissors and risk its life with little chances of success for those extra 50 cal/kg."
LoGiCaL bEhaViOr !
I don’t know if it’s just me but the way the Gastonia completely disregards the Utahraptor is hilarious
Well, to be fair, it is accurate animal behavior. Most herbivores will ignore a carnivore, once they manage to incapacitate it.
0:43 I think the title was referring to the last stand of this individual Utahraptor or possibly Utahraptor as a whole rather than dromaeosaurs in general
pyroraptor and velociraptor: hey
@@jett5180 why bring those two up?
Sean Dewar slyth i read your comment wrong
I have a feeling that they recycled that title from Custer’s Last Stand
People who love paleontology: Dromaeosaurs were feathered.
Mega Dinosaurs: FEATHERED DINOSAURS ARE NOT COOL
Me: FEATHERED DINOSAURS ARE JUST AS COOL AS SCALY ONES
Feathers on dinosaurs may not make them look scary but they do make them more huggable. Not that I recommend hugging a Dromeasaur.
They are cooler
Feathered Dino's are much cooler
Indeed
@@idreesiothegreat1543 well said mate
7:43 Probably because it looks more like Deinonychus which leads to two possibilities
A. They did it to reuse the Deinonychus model because they're lazy
B. They wanted it to resemble The Jurassic Park Velociraptor Design
Utahraptor: slices gastonia’s belly
Also utahraptor: I’ve only used 1% of my power
Gastonia: get rekt by this tail
Utahraptor: it is but a flesh wound
Those Utahraptars that did reach the size of the one in the episode were ether well feed or had gigantism in my theory at least
Gigantism is very rare in nature, and JFC's utahraptor is only slightly bigger than the real animal, so it's likely that it is simply the result of individual variation.
Paleo Nerd ok
@@PaleoNerd1905 wait rly?
I had no idea.
Actually carrion does have less nutritional value as once the carcus decomposes the value of the meat drops but yes you are right as it would be more effective to scavenge over attacking a living opponent.
12:59 It's funny how they say sand make him handicap yet they didn't uesd that splay toes excuse like did they did with Bloodiest battles
Real Utahraptor: A big and stocky bird
JFC Utahraptor: A big, skinny, bipedal lizard with broken wrists
11:47 I actually checked, and it really does depend on how much time the carcass is, well... A carcass.
At least Dinosaur Revolution has a feathered Utahraptor that hunted in the correct method and fought other Utahraptors over a young Cedarsaurus which is just like the mobbing behavior that Komodo dragons have today.
I loved dinosaur revolution idc what people say
You know what small detail about this episode has always kind of bugged me? The Gastonia's ability to smell water underground. Can animals actually do that, depending on how deep underground the water is? I would think that they would hear the water instead of smelling it.....
Animals can smell water (or at least they can smell things commonly found near water). Whether this applies to water underground I’m not sure, but ankylosaurs are believed to have very active senses of smell, and iirc the narrator says that the water is only a foot deep, so I wouldn’t say it’s that big of a stretch.
Oh yeah I have something to say about the raptor vs t-Rex episode
I don’t know why dromeosaurus is always pictured in the maastricbtian, they are teeth from both troodon and dromeosaurus teeth that date to Maastrichtian layers but their existence into that time is questionable still and is up for debate
From what I know, the Maastrichtian Dromaeosaurus teeth are now believed to belong to Acheroraptor, although remains in Prince Creek are still classified as Dromaeosaurus. The Maastrichtian "Troodon" teeth now belong to Pectinodon, as the genus Troodon is no longer valid.
Paleo Nerd well troodon is still valid just not to the extent it was before 2017, actually it’s considered potentially doboius
@@PaleoNerd1905 The Prince Creek dromeosaur is undoubtedly not Dromeosaurus, it just hasn't been properly identified yet, given how Dromeosaurus was a Campanian taxon, but much like with the Hell Creek dromeosaurs, this is just a hangover from the 1990s/early 2000s when paleontologists just lumped any North American late Cretaceous small dromeosaur fossil into Dromeosaurus due to a lack of better options. Sufficient to say, the PD dromeosaur is far more likely to be Saurornitholestes, Atrociraptor or an entirely new genus.
Basically, whenever you see a Maastrichtian fossil formation list "Dromeosaurus" among its fossil finds, you know that it's an actually an as of yet unidentified raptor carrying a heavily outdated placeholder name.
Good old wastebasket taxonomy, a hangover from the 1990s/early to mid-2000s when paleontologists just lumped any North American late Cretaceous small dromeosaur fossil into Dromeosaurus due to a lack of better options. "Maastrichtian Dromeosaurus" as shown in Walking with Dinosaurus and Jurassic Fight Club are retroactively identified as Archeroraptor. Same exact story with Troodon, the Maastrichtian ones are Pectinodon.
Dalibor Jovanovic Thanks for the info! The Prince Creek dromaeosaur will probably take a while to be named, since iirc all we have from it is teeth.
Also, do you know how much we actually have of the Arctic troodont? I remember hearing it was more dromaeosaur-like so I’m guessing we have more than just teeth.
Also, I think the bigger danger of scavenging carcasses as opposed to fresh meat is the chance that the carcass might have parasites or something. I think Planet Dinosaur refers to this as "botulism" or something.
That rarely happens, and it would still be better than trying to take down an animal so heavily armored it’s nearly impossible to kill without risk of injury. Predators always want to avoid injury, because wounds can get infected and/or impede their ability to hunt, which would be fatal. So in a drought like that, it would be better to scavenge.
Predators are basically those kids in schools who bully the weak but avoid the strong.
Somewhat.
A healthy, adult Gastonia would be unlikely to have any natural enemies. Predators would instinctively know it is not worth the effort.
I think they wanted to make the Utahraptor look like the Jurassic World Velociraptors hence the weird head shape
12:19 Oh gee, I am sure this will in no way sound akward later on in this episode of Jurassic Fight Club!
I really enjoy these analysis videos! I’m looking forward to the next one!
Fixing JFC:
A Gastonia is searching for food in Utah.It doesn't find any plants,but finds a dead Dakotadon with claw marks and teeth marks.It hears a loud screech,and then,a Utahraptor appears. The Utahraptor is watching every step of the Gastonia. The Utahraptor's preys are marched at this time,so it thinked about trying to hunt down thd Gastonia. The Utahraptor is getting close to the Gastonia,but the Gastonia swings it's tail.The Utahraptor screeches at the Gastonia,but the Gastonia swings it's tail,and it hits the Utahraptor,killing it. Months later a group of Cedarosaurses are marching to the formation,and a Cedarosaurus steps on something spiky.....the deac body of the dried out Gastonia.
Very informative, thanks a lot considering Gastonia is my favorite Herbivore I'm glad that someone is clearing up some JFC inaccuracies.
is it me or the show utharaptor seem inspired by the jurassic park 3 velociraptor version?
It’s definitely possible, but I think it’s more likely a coincidence.
@@PaleoNerd1905 the "feather" at the back of the head kinda look like the one from JP III(also their raptor design is cooler than the one in the show I think[even if innacurate but I wont complain about the dinosaur of jurassic park because they're basicaly hybrid from the start[frog DNA combine with dinosaur dna,it was explained in the first movie ruclips.net/video/h58lRIVHhGc/видео.html ]) ,will you mentien the way jurassic fight club was edited?
Utahraptor: tries to hunt gastonia
Every single living being in the Earth: what da dog doin?
A tiger was able to clear a 12 ft fence in one jump and they can reach like 600+ lbs
I think it may have possible a Utah could make a jump like that
Utahraptor weighed well over 1,000 lbs and was built like a tyrannosaur. It very clearly was not built for jumping.
It would more likely smash through the fence
Gastonia- 1
Utahraptor-0
When you mentioned the sauropods that Utahraptor May have hunted if the former were juveniles, what about Sauroposeidon? Did that massive sauropod ever encounter Utahraptor? I know it lived with Acrocanthosaurus and Deinonychus.
I highly doubt it. Maybe those animals didn’t evolve yet when Utahraptor was roaming Cedar Mountain.
L Gaines I think the main Sauropod that Utahraptor probably encountered was Astrodon.
utahraptor lived 126 to 124 MYA, deinonychus, sauroposeidon, acrochantosaurus, tenontosaurus and other lived 10 million years later, SOOOOOOOOO...... no
I noticed you mentioned that the Utahraptor could have just waited for the bite/slash to kill the prey, but would the animal have been intelligent enough to know and understand this? Or would it not have stopped its attacks until the prey stops moving?
Considering how animals nowadays are intelligent enough to use similar tactics when hunting, it's not an unreasonable assumption for the Utahraptor to do the same thing.
So, jurassic fight club is one of those documentaries that tries to be so bad it's good
Could a Utahraptor really jump over a Gastonia?
Now that's a good question.
Come to think of it, it would be really cool to see the JFC doing the calcs that lead to some of their claims as part of the episodes.
Imo this is probably the best episode.
I don't believe that thing from jurassic fight club is an uhatraptor and if that's an uhatraptor then that thing from valley of the t-rex is a tyrannosaurus 😨
😂😂😂
For Velociraptor in particular, if they were to hold their arm out the hand would supinate like the Utahraptor had done at the beginning at the fight. If the bones of the Utahraptors arm work the same then it should be able to turn the hand like it did.
It sucks that some documentaries kind of suck
Yeah, I agree.
Good video as always, though I think you would definitely benefit from cutting pieces of your recording where you mess up (only keeping when you repeat it correctly) and cutting the recording before you hear the click that ends the recording. Both of them kind of messed with the flow of the video. Other than that it was still very good and informative.
Hey they got something right for once, the Utahraptor isn’t hunting in a group, while other episodes have dromaeosaurs are shown hunting together
Paleo Nerd what the heck are you talking about? Most larger Dromaeosaurs reach at a height of 6 or 6.6 ft (2 meters in general) that's the average height for most of these species; unless you are referring to estimations for the hips? If so then at least clarify that in the future with all other dinosaurs, since a total reconstruction of most dinosaurs would require the full total height.
What universe are you from where most dromaeosaurs are 6 feet tall? Velociraptor isn't even 2 feet tall, and Deinonychus was a little over 2 feet in height. The only dromaeosaurs that were close to a height of 6 feet were the giant ones like Utahraptor and Achillobator. I would like to know why you think hip heights would make any difference, since almost all dinosaurs hold their bodies parallel to the ground, so their shoulders and hips would be at roughly the same height anyway.
@@PaleoNerd1905 Perhaps you didn't read it clearly. I said most 'LARGER' dromaeosaurs, jeeves. It's ironic you christen yourself with the title of "Paleo Nerd" when you can't even remember some of the largest of dromaeosaurs such as Austroraptor, Dromaeosauroides (supposedly), Dakotaraptor, and the Wales Velociraptorine. In furthering adding though hip height estimates help it they do not help estimate the dinosaurs full height and shoulder estimates in some dinosaurs are sometimes shorter or longer than the hip and that's not accounting for posture.
@@TheMightyN Ok, you are right that I didn't read that clearly, but because I didn't mention those other dromaeosaurs does not mean I didn't know they existed or forgot about them, so you can lay off on the insults. Btw, Dromaeosauroides is known from two teeth, so we can't really reliably estimate it's size, and the Wales velociraptorine might actually be a proceratosaurid tyrannosauroid, due to how similar their teeth are to dromaeosaurs.
I will thank you for clarifying your issue over the difference between the hip height and shoulder height, and I will take that in consideration when making future videos.
Can't wait till the next episode that you'll make an analysis on next.:)
What type of ornithochiridae do you pick ?
Nice another upload
Why are raptors in media always never feathered like bruh feathered raptors are cooler and accurate but all they do is put quills and be like you happy now like bruh its like giving a child only 1 chicken nugget out of 10 chicken nuggets they could get instead
I wanna see the DINO TURKEYS!
It seems that the mass still believe that scaly raptors are cooler and scarier than feathered ones. While this is acceptable in the realm of entertainment. Documentaries should aim for education instead of entertainment.
@@伊斯塔與艾蕾修卡都是 But this show is leaning more towards entertainment than actual education
Watch Your dinosaurs are wrong video about Velociraptor or allosaurus about how Utahraptor strike the Gastonia in its belly .
A fucking ceratosaurus can jump higher than a fucking dromeosaurus
Lol
5:00 Iguanacolossus? WHO INVENTED THESE NAMES?? (Let me guess it means colossal iguana)
Yep. Iirc it was named that because it's one of the largest of the non-hadrosaur iguanodonts.
This episode so bad it makes my body coil up and curl
Can you stop referring the early or late parts of the periods of the mesozoic as separate time periods, and 65 mya is not the end of the cretaceous, 66 mya is, the documentary mentions that common mistake, or are you going to do this in your series wide analysis, and nano from t rex hunter is said to weigh a ton and the triassic is said to last from 225 to 193 mya in the docu
Mentioning the early/late parts of a period of the Mesozoic is very important. Take the Cretaceous for example. The Cretaceous period is the longest of the three Mesozoic periods, and as such, animals that lived at the beginning of the Cretaceous are very different from those that lived at the end. So yeah, it is important what part I’m talking about. I already know about the other stuff, and most of that stuff I mention in other episodes. I list the episode number on each video for the exact reason of letting people know to watch the other episodes. Otherwise you will miss things and complain I didn’t cover or explain stuff when I did just that in another video. As for the 66/65 mya, that will be addressed in either Raptors vs. T. rex or the series wide analysis.
But their supposed to be epochs
Enzo Ayala The Mesozoic doesn’t have epochs, the Cenozoic does. If you’re talking about stuff like Barremian and Maastrichtian, those are ages, which are different from epochs. I’ll probably make a video soon explaining the geologic time scale and the difference between different subdivisions like ages and epochs.
I was not, I said that because Wikipedia calls the early Triassic, mid Triassic, late Triassic, early Jurassic, mid Jurassic, late Jurassic, early cretaceous and late cretaceous as epochs
@@enzoayala4629 That makes sense. I actually forgot that those are epochs. Still, those count as separate time periods, because epochs, ages, eras, etc. are all different time periods.
i agree jfc is pretty horrible. and why is it hosted by dino george he is very educated on dinosaurs.
Dinosaur George was the reason why he did this documentary in the first place
Part of it it was his idea to make a Pachyrhinosaurs to have a horn
when will the torture come back? I really enjoy those video
First will be a Natural History if Dromaeosaurids Part 1, then an Elaphrosaurus Profile, then an analysis of Ice Age Monsters.
6:47 Actually no
Utahraptor is now considered to be less feathered rather fully plumaged because the environment in which it lived in was dessert region and fully feathered body would overheat it 😁
Ostriches live in hot arid regions, and they are still fully feathered. Feathers can be used to cool an animal as well as to keep it warm.
Paleo Nerd lol rekt.
@@PaleoNerd1905 Utahraptor is slightly bigger and bigger creatures absorb more heat, so maybe it was NOT fully feathered (which I highly doubt) and Ostriches do lose feathers. But yeah, that's true. So maybe Utahraptor was fully feathered, which is the most likely.
Feathers can also make an animal cold
Utahraptor is my favorite dinosaur and i really annoys me to see how much jfc screwed it up
Are these Dinosaurs wrists are broken? Why in every episode the Dinosaurs wrists are moving onward and not inward as they supposed to?
By the way, am I an idiot?
Nah you are right
Jurassic World Evolution 2 has a much better Utahraptor
I thought birds WERE reptiles? I think you meant something like "squamate" or "lizard"
Yes I did mean squamates.
So technically birds were squamates before archosaurs slip off
Ummmmmmmm...whatttt!! The show called gastonia little while
Gastonia is 5 metres long and weight 1ton
The show called the thing that longer4metres and weight more than hundred little!!!!!!!!
Oh god!!! Are you drunk huh?!?!?!?!
Longer than 4metres is typo
I thought “raptors last stand” meant the Utahraptor was going to lose.