Can you please do an accuracy review of Disney’s Dinosaur? Obviously not a documentary, but these reviews are so entertaining and I’m sure there’s a lot to cover on that movie!
@@canonbehenna612 This 2001 movie is a great movie but who was during a very long time and even again a little today underrated. Because for a Disney movie, he did many things off the beaten track ! There any musique singing by the character, there a lot of action, with many dark, serious, and horro element, and with a harsh and hard atmosphere to depict a world in which survival is dominant and which ways the character will choose to face obstacle, either by remaining together (Aladar) or being every man for himself (Kron). For a 2001 movie, the CGI is great, and despite that the characters are very realisitc and mostly accurate in physical term like their specie were in real life, their are very expressive with many facial expression. It's like in the Lion King 2019 but with the character being animals with high expressive facial expressions. And that was 18 years before the 2019 movie ! (which mean that this latter have less excuses sadly).
Well, outside that most of the species onscreen of visualy very close in physical appearance to what they had look in reality, there nothing to really say about accuracies in this movie. The cast of creactures are a compilation of species that never meet in real life either because they never lived at the same time or even exist in the same location. But for a 2001 movie, there some highlights we can notice, like the fact they shown Velociraptors with the good size and shape (no feathers but it's already that) and they use carnotaurus instead of T-rex, with a lot of osteoderms on it !
I'm surprised that THIS got as high as D- on your list. You were too generous for this "masterpiece". Imo it's a straight F - especially for that line about birds.. and "triceratops" fossils scattered around Asia, aw Lord... Also, that Alabama joke was savage 💀
The fact it got a D- just goes to show that there are still worse documentaries out there. Documentaries so bad that they give this one a fleeting pass by comparison.
Oh God, I can't unsee it now, that looks so wrong. If theropod tails moved like that they'd make gruesome crunching and cracking sounds every second! My spine hurts just thinking about that. XD
yo, if you find out where to watch Animal Armageddon tell me cos I've been wanting to rewatch it. Was very fond of it when it came out, and going off memory it seems pretty good, bit awesomebro but good. Although 'Troodon' hunting an Edmontosaurus hurt even back then, but there is a bit where a Rex yeets one to space if I recall, which is great.
I think he said during the Walking With Beasts video that he’s not doing Walking With Cavemen because he doesn’t find it interesting. The others would be sick though!
I find it kind of weird that, as far as I know, the only documentary to really even address that Tyrannosaurus itself was essentially an invasive species in North America is When Dinosaurs Roamed America with a brief, easily missed line. Everything else (again, to the best of my knowledge) just glosses over that fact, which for some reason my nerd brain finds really interesting.
Dude I love your videos. It’s resurrected my love for prehistoric animals, and man it just brings me so much joy to just experience this type of content. Love your vids bro
I think Jack Horner made this to make T-Rex even more than a scavenger after realizing that Tyrannosaurus wasn’t a scavenger and wanted it to have feathers
Yo man, been watching your videos for a while. Gotta say I love em. Watching dinosaur stuff brings me back to when I was a kid and it's interesting to see how paleontology has evolved over the years and which documentaries hold up and how. Keep up the great work man.
As a Dino-Nerd and amateur paleontologist who grew up watching shows like Dinosaur Planet, When Dinosaurs Roamed America and the Walking With shows since childhood, I can tell that your videos are a pretty good analysis of how factual or non-factual media depictions of prehistoric creatures have changed over the years and how they fare on the sliding scale of accuracy vs inaccuracy.
Just one small nitpick, Proceratosaurs did not have the arctometatarsalian condition. The oldest evidence of it comes from Moros and Alectrosaurus (Suskityrannus is a honorable mention, who missed the mark by 4 million years or so, but that's generally around the same time), while early/basal Pantyrannosaurs like Dilong or Eotyrannus still retained the normal condition, so it arose somewhere along the line between them. Other than this, great video as always, especially the part about making distinction between genera and species. (Though when the narrator calls all ceratopsians "Triceratops" a "Those are Triceratops" meme from RickRaptor would have been welcome.)
Ah yeah ! This internet meme from the Mondo World "The Lion King" rippoff when Simba and Bambi rippoff discovers a lost world with dinosaurs. With the "Triceratops" are carnivores, attack a sauropod, make Mountain Lion sound and shoot laser beams. That ! That is really so bad that is actually funny ! (but not this documentary)
I'm curious, I know this series is going to go over dinosaur media from the past until present, but will this also cover smaller works like Dead Sound's Dinosauria series?
I feel like there’s a stigma of feathered dinosaurs looking goofy with colorful feathers, the feathers not arranged properly or even just looking too chicken, when the opposite was true as feathered Dinosaurs would’ve had variety (some looking majestic, scary, colorful, and cute). Meanwhile, there’s a stigma of herbivorous dinosaurs like Sauropods and ceratopsians having elephantine skin texture and legs, dull monotone color and just being depicted as slow moving, gentle giants while the hadrosaurs are depicted as meat-eating, punching bags. Again, all of that would’ve been the opposite and it seems like terrible documentaries like these perpetrate those myths and misconceptions.
After watching the video and all of your Dino doc reviews since I first subscribed to your channel back in August, I can narrow down the different eras of Dinosaur depictions throughout the last 150-200 years: Mid to late 1800s: when paleontology first discovered Dinosaur fossils, they were first depicted as big, slow moving, dumb lizards Early 1900s-1970s: dinosaurs are depicted as upright standing, tail dragging kangaroo reptiles that lived in swamps. 1980s/1990s-2000s: dinosaurs are depicted as fast moving, warm blooded, horizontally posed and active bird-like creatures. This era also spawned the “awesomebro” mentally of dinosaurs being seen as killer monsters that roared and fought. Early-mid 2010s: the depiction of dinosaurs changed again with the discovery of feathers and bird like dinosaurs from decades ago, now with controversial discoveries that challenged the norm by trying to put feathers on everything. This era spawned the “feathered nazi” group of people who think all dinosaurs should have feathers despite evidence to the contrary. Late 2010s to now: the current era we live in that depicts dinosaurs based on our current scientific research that depict dinosaurs with the latest science. Dinosaurs are seen as true animals with wide variety from scaly to feathery, and the public is slowly but surely accepting the current image of dinosaurs.
I love all your dinosaur content and it is some of the best I have seen on this platform and am glad I finally found a channel like yours. Also I was wondering if you ever thought of doing Accuracy Reviews are dinosaur games such as the Isle or Ark.
The fact that they had fully fledged models of Zuniceratops and Diabloceratops,yet decided to reuse TRICERATOPS for the segments with Moros and Lythronax baffles me
Did, did the creators of this documentary seriously think that giant, multi-ton theropods were capable of jumping several feet into the air like fricking kangaroos!? XD
That gigachad Siats just bodied those 2 Moros like they were just small insects annoying it. Can't wait for him to roast Amazing Dino World's Pachyrhinosaurus.
I had to stop the video to see if Appalachiosaurus was on the family tree and glad to see that it was, mainly as I am always happy that the Alabama Tyrannosaur gets any attention at all.
Another 2 things are Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops weighting 6 tons And the dumbest gualong and moros i ever seen Gualong jumping into moving thagomizers and moros trying to scare siats instead of running as fast as they can
Other things i noticed after beacuse my brain was melting: The tails of the Dinosaurs look like can bend till It touches their Heads and Triceratops being fodder and being able to get lifted by 2 lythronax This is the documentary with the lowest sense of laws of force
10:30 ive seen that guy in a few things including a "rating movie dinosaur scenes" video and he always seems so wholesome. Hes just how a paleontology looks in my head.
I argued w a channel once about T-Rex I said, “there’s no evidence they had feathers “ And channel wouldn’t accept it. Therefore I’m subscribing to this channel 🎉
One thing that you forget to precise in this video, is that the tyrannosaurs genera and species we have in this docmentary, and which not help this latter sadly, is that they are always shown during the CGI sequences attacking other animals or roaring onscreen, like how to show their were badass in real life. That explain the T-rex duo killing a Siat, being fast runner, and the Matrix slow motion jump when the two T-rex at the end face each others. The fact that small species such Proceratosaurus, Guanlong and Moros attack bigger dinosaurs such the asiatic stegosaurid or the Siat is also very stupid and unrealistic. Showing them like mindless creature that want so strongly to fight that they attack at view everything they see without taking into account the size or the environment around them. We are really completely into a famous common trope that deserve to be reserved for no documentaries productions and not use in a documentary to be sure to have the public's attention. Also, for a documentary about Tyrannosauroid evolutionary line, we speak mostly about the first members and the T-rex. Not many about the others Tyrannosaurs. Sure, it's cool to have mention and apparition of species such the Qianzhousaurus or Nanuqsaurus, and some others, who aren't not so much used in medias regulary. But most of the species of tyrannosaurs we have here have not many screen time (most of them with only few seconds). So again, a additional sad point...
This blue headed T-Rex is the same from the epic/spectacular 2 part series Amazing DinoWorld !!! A very awesome series full of outstanding species and designs !!!
It's really like a weird mix of JFC, Dinosaur Revolution and just a weird mix of dinosaur documentary at the time Overall it's decent and yes this video was really good
First dino doc I ever saw. It holds up worse than I ever could have imagined. Glad you got around to it. 15.01 very small nitpick and I’m not positive as to whether there are multiple spellings of it but I believe “veranus” should be spelled “varanus” instead.
2:00 - Holy Jesus, look at it running! Please, have mercy at poor thing's legs! 13:29 - Erm... WTF is this? Because of those 2 moments I had to watch your video twice. Sorry couldn't listen, was too distracted by that literal hell of animation.
Do they actually show two Lythronax killing a Siats? Even if that is not supposed to be a Siats but just a lazy reskin, it still makes no sense. Allosaurs (as far as all available evidence shows) died out during the Turonian, about 90 mya, around 10 million years before Lythronax showed up.
Hey red, I think I might have a good recommendation(sorry about bugging you about it, I spelled it wrong last time) dinosaurs if the frozen continent-ancient earth
Could we go back to review Discovery's 2010 docu "Last Day of the Dinosaurs"? The models were reused from "Clash of the Dinosaurs", but maybe their behavior is a little more accurate.
If I had a nickel for every relatively important t-Rex specimen displayed in Illinois, I’d have two nickels, which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice, right?
“T-Rex: An Evolutionary Journey” (NHK, 2016, 50 minutes) is a One-Shot documentary about the evolution of the Tyrannosaurs family. Interstingly, despite having been made by the same channel than “Amazing Dino World”, this documentary was made before this latter (being made in 2019, and as an effect, the CGI of the creature, even still correct, is not the exact same, even if most of the design (like the one of the T-rex) remain the same than in the 2019 production. But like mentioned here, it's impossible and unealistic that a complete full-grown adult T-rex can have feathers all on his body. So the T-rex of Amazing Dino World are also already at the base completely innacurate. And mostly due to this re-used action by the creators to use again the same design from this 2016 documentary instead to create new ones. So yep, the 2010's era in the paleocommunity and media had strongly been marked with the overuse of feathers in any kind of dinosaur belonging to a family in which at least one member was proven to have at least some feathering on him. With generic fluing bird feathers, not fuzz or proto-feathers, but complete feathers. For me, a good part of this trope come from the fact that we have been hammered so hard the people/public into their heads that raptors (Dromeosauridae and Troodontidae) have feathers all over their bodies that work too well, and put any kind of feathers in every kind of dinos with at least one member was actually have feathers. Tyrannosaurid and Therizhiosaurid are good example of that sad bonus effect. Others such Oviraptosaurid, Ornithomimid and their relatives don't suffers to much thankfully. Because most of them are small to medium and slender animals, and so, must have teguments to keep them warm. Only small to lesser medium creatues in every dinosaurs clade or babies/juveniles of big and huge species have feathers, for warm use, and even here, the feathers were mostly see only fuzz or proto-feathers, not true generic feathers. It's only in the Coelusaurian dinosaurs that true feathers were abundant in almost all the body. But in many, like for the Oviraptosaurid and Ornithomimid again, true feathers were only present on the arms and tail for sexual mate uses, not for warm use. This latter aspect was made by fuzz on all the dinos body. Because yes, many dinos in the Coelusaurian have both fuzz on all the body and true feathers in some specific parts.
6:14 you forgot to mention the ankylosaurs fulfilling the medium armored herbivore niche in both continents. Strangely though is that the ceratopsians were more diverse and prevalent in North America, having a huge diversity of both centrosaurs, chasmosaurs and even basal ceratopsians, while from Asia the only big ceratopsian we know of Sinoceratops, with most of the others being basal ceratopsians like protoceratops, koreaceratops and Udanoceratops; I do Wonder why was it the case, however the same can be said about therizinosaurs, with only Nothronychus having notoriety on the New World
“Hadrosaurs are large herbivores “ thank god.They are always depicted as weak.They grew that way so they can A.run if they must B.fight off what ever was in their environment for example a edmontosaurs grew to its size since it’s slow and can be able to defend itself against T. rex they adapted in a way for a reasons not just some pushovers but something that can be the last thing a predator sees as it dies
Is Amazing Dinoworld next? You probably won't have to talk about the Tyrannosaurus too much because it's reused from this documentary. I would give Amazing Dinoworld either a D+ or a C-
Timurlengia wasn't shown living in the Americas but in the bissekty, Uzbekistan plus you gotta understand that Uzbekistan was once under the turguy strait with islands poking out like the Mediterranean or South East Asia.
Didn't this show actually feature a *featherless troodontid* hanging out with overfeathered tyrannosaurs? I once saw a youtube clip like that, where the tyrannosaur designs looked very close to these.
I mean, pretty much all documentaries select only the excerpts they want from the experts, and cut the rest, like they can have an hour of interview with the experts to show 5-10 minutes. The trick is to have a competent editor and not show the part where you've cut the sound ^^'
RRW should review Disney's 2000 film 'Dinosaur', I think it would be a lot of fun for him to rip into it, not only was it my childhood, but it was also extremely inaccurate.
Before the Amazing Dinoworld review comes out I want to give out some inaccuracies I found from it. 1. Pronated hands 2. Pachyrhinosaurus 1. Nose horn 2. Thick coat of fur 3. Skull represents the wrong species 4. Appeared around 70-69 mya not 66 mya 5. Size around 16ft/5m not around 23ft/7m? 3. Troodon 1. The Genus is invalid 2. Live in a pack 4. Avimimus 1. No tail or it’s too small 5. Zanabazar 1. Snouts are too deep 6. Protoceratops 1. Lived around 75-71 mya not 66 mya 7. Halszkaraptor 1. Lived around 75-71 mya not 66 mya 8. Tyrannosaurids 1. T.Rex and Tarbosaurus are feathered 2. Tarbosaurus skull 3. Tarbosaurus is 12m not 10m 4. Tarbosaurus and T.Rex pack hunts 5. T.rex upright position for a moment 9. Rugops 1. Feathers 2. Stated as Abeilosaurus 10. Spinosaurus 1. Knuckle walk? 11. Tambatitanis 1. Macronarians = no rearing up on the back legs 2. Lived around 112-109 mya not 66 mya 3. Lived in Japan not North America 12. Kamuysaurus 1. Lived in Japan not North America 2. Called Hadrosaurus 3. Lived around 72-70 mya not 66 mya 13.Azhdarcho 1. Lived in Asia not North America 2. Lived around 92 mya not 66 mya 14. Deinocheirus 1. Juveniles look like copies of the adults? Is there anything I missed or got incorrect? Please let me know.
Man Hope It gets F its Just trex an evolutionary journey with extra Inacuraccies i hate How they recycle the models from TAEJ for T.rex as Instead of doing more research and learning with their errors
Probably the next documentary they make they are gonna travel to paleozoic oceans and we see a trex before diving in the water and basilosaurus hunting anomalocaris
Can you please do an accuracy review of Disney’s Dinosaur? Obviously not a documentary, but these reviews are so entertaining and I’m sure there’s a lot to cover on that movie!
If say it terrible I wouldn’t watch any of this videos
@@canonbehenna612 I have genuinely no idea what you are saying.
@@OncelerKidsAreCringe because dinosaur is a great Disney movie not as great as some of it musicals but pretty amazing
@@canonbehenna612 This 2001 movie is a great movie but who was during a very long time and even again a little today underrated.
Because for a Disney movie, he did many things off the beaten track !
There any musique singing by the character, there a lot of action, with many dark, serious, and horro element, and with a harsh and hard atmosphere to depict a world in which survival is dominant and which ways the character will choose to face obstacle, either by remaining together (Aladar) or being every man for himself (Kron).
For a 2001 movie, the CGI is great, and despite that the characters are very realisitc and mostly accurate in physical term like their specie were in real life, their are very expressive with many facial expression.
It's like in the Lion King 2019 but with the character being animals with high expressive facial expressions. And that was 18 years before the 2019 movie !
(which mean that this latter have less excuses sadly).
Well, outside that most of the species onscreen of visualy very close in physical appearance to what they had look in reality, there nothing to really say about accuracies in this movie.
The cast of creactures are a compilation of species that never meet in real life either because they never lived at the same time or even exist in the same location.
But for a 2001 movie, there some highlights we can notice, like the fact they shown Velociraptors with the good size and shape (no feathers but it's already that) and they use carnotaurus instead of T-rex, with a lot of osteoderms on it !
I'm surprised that THIS got as high as D- on your list. You were too generous for this "masterpiece". Imo it's a straight F - especially for that line about birds.. and "triceratops" fossils scattered around Asia, aw Lord...
Also, that Alabama joke was savage 💀
The fact it got a D- just goes to show that there are still worse documentaries out there. Documentaries so bad that they give this one a fleeting pass by comparison.
That running Guanlong animation at 2:00 is the peak of cinema!
I can smell sarcasm, and I detect a strong odour in this direction.
Can we take a moment to appreciate the fact that this man watches the biggest crap in existence to entertain us? Respect
it's not the biggest crap
@@ivanasukjadic1423 u sure? 💀
Tarbosaurus the mightiest ever: “Allow me to introduce myself!”
Upvoted initially just out of habit, but "Shantungosaurus Who" legitimately earned my thumbs up haha. Nice Vid!
Upvoted? What is this, Reddit?
I'm sad you never pointed out how all the dinosaurs have flexible octopus tentacles for tails.
when we've got a slo-mo matrix shot of two T.rexes jumping at each other the wiggly tail is the least of the problems.
Oh God, I can't unsee it now, that looks so wrong. If theropod tails moved like that they'd make gruesome crunching and cracking sounds every second! My spine hurts just thinking about that. XD
0:45 ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew ew.
It was so weird to look at lol
I hope you do these in the future:
- Animal Armageddon
- Prehistoric Predators
- Walking with Cavemen
- Supercroc (2001 documentary)
Oh God why super croc💀
yo, if you find out where to watch Animal Armageddon tell me cos I've been wanting to rewatch it. Was very fond of it when it came out, and going off memory it seems pretty good, bit awesomebro but good. Although 'Troodon' hunting an Edmontosaurus hurt even back then, but there is a bit where a Rex yeets one to space if I recall, which is great.
And Dino Super World
I think he said during the Walking With Beasts video that he’s not doing Walking With Cavemen because he doesn’t find it interesting. The others would be sick though!
Oh yeah Animal Armageddon, it's so long since I've seen these....
I find it kind of weird that, as far as I know, the only documentary to really even address that Tyrannosaurus itself was essentially an invasive species in North America is When Dinosaurs Roamed America with a brief, easily missed line. Everything else (again, to the best of my knowledge) just glosses over that fact, which for some reason my nerd brain finds really interesting.
Dude I love your videos. It’s resurrected my love for prehistoric animals, and man it just brings me so much joy to just experience this type of content. Love your vids bro
I think Jack Horner made this to make T-Rex even more than a scavenger after realizing that Tyrannosaurus wasn’t a scavenger and wanted it to have feathers
The man just cant accept that he was wrong about basically everything Trex related
Yo man, been watching your videos for a while. Gotta say I love em. Watching dinosaur stuff brings me back to when I was a kid and it's interesting to see how paleontology has evolved over the years and which documentaries hold up and how. Keep up the great work man.
As a Dino-Nerd and amateur paleontologist who grew up watching shows like Dinosaur Planet, When Dinosaurs Roamed America and the Walking With shows since childhood, I can tell that your videos are a pretty good analysis of how factual or non-factual media depictions of prehistoric creatures have changed over the years and how they fare on the sliding scale of accuracy vs inaccuracy.
Just one small nitpick, Proceratosaurs did not have the arctometatarsalian condition. The oldest evidence of it comes from Moros and Alectrosaurus (Suskityrannus is a honorable mention, who missed the mark by 4 million years or so, but that's generally around the same time), while early/basal Pantyrannosaurs like Dilong or Eotyrannus still retained the normal condition, so it arose somewhere along the line between them. Other than this, great video as always, especially the part about making distinction between genera and species.
(Though when the narrator calls all ceratopsians "Triceratops" a "Those are Triceratops" meme from RickRaptor would have been welcome.)
Ah yeah ! This internet meme from the Mondo World "The Lion King" rippoff when Simba and Bambi rippoff discovers a lost world with dinosaurs. With the "Triceratops" are carnivores, attack a sauropod, make Mountain Lion sound and shoot laser beams.
That ! That is really so bad that is actually funny ! (but not this documentary)
I'm curious, I know this series is going to go over dinosaur media from the past until present, but will this also cover smaller works like Dead Sound's Dinosauria series?
Honestly if Red Raptor does. I would want him to expand his research with the "making of" videos that David makes
It would have been more accurate to say "some creatures alive today are descended from the Tyrannoraptora branch of dinosaurs, the birds"
I feel like there’s a stigma of feathered dinosaurs looking goofy with colorful feathers, the feathers not arranged properly or even just looking too chicken, when the opposite was true as feathered Dinosaurs would’ve had variety (some looking majestic, scary, colorful, and cute). Meanwhile, there’s a stigma of herbivorous dinosaurs like Sauropods and ceratopsians having elephantine skin texture and legs, dull monotone color and just being depicted as slow moving, gentle giants while the hadrosaurs are depicted as meat-eating, punching bags. Again, all of that would’ve been the opposite and it seems like terrible documentaries like these perpetrate those myths and misconceptions.
Prehistoric Planet finally did it right, especially for sauropods. That Dreadnoughtus sequence was just magnificent.
After watching the video and all of your Dino doc reviews since I first subscribed to your channel back in August, I can narrow down the different eras of Dinosaur depictions throughout the last 150-200 years:
Mid to late 1800s: when paleontology first discovered Dinosaur fossils, they were first depicted as big, slow moving, dumb lizards
Early 1900s-1970s: dinosaurs are depicted as upright standing, tail dragging kangaroo reptiles that lived in swamps.
1980s/1990s-2000s: dinosaurs are depicted as fast moving, warm blooded, horizontally posed and active bird-like creatures. This era also spawned the “awesomebro” mentally of dinosaurs being seen as killer monsters that roared and fought.
Early-mid 2010s: the depiction of dinosaurs changed again with the discovery of feathers and bird like dinosaurs from decades ago, now with controversial discoveries that challenged the norm by trying to put feathers on everything. This era spawned the “feathered nazi” group of people who think all dinosaurs should have feathers despite evidence to the contrary.
Late 2010s to now: the current era we live in that depicts dinosaurs based on our current scientific research that depict dinosaurs with the latest science. Dinosaurs are seen as true animals with wide variety from scaly to feathery, and the public is slowly but surely accepting the current image of dinosaurs.
I love all your dinosaur content and it is some of the best I have seen on this platform and am glad I finally found a channel like yours. Also I was wondering if you ever thought of doing Accuracy Reviews are dinosaur games such as the Isle or Ark.
I remember watching this a couple months ago and I was like, this is a real documentary, a DOCUMENTARY.
Next up is Amazing Dinoworld!
I can’t wait to see you shred their depiction of my favorite dinosaur (Deinocheirus) to shreds.
And the pachyrhinosaurus
spoiler alert: he actually complimented a it lot
The fact that they had fully fledged models of Zuniceratops and Diabloceratops,yet decided to reuse TRICERATOPS for the segments with Moros and Lythronax baffles me
The amount of bad docs he has to sit through is crazy thanks you for giving us the entertainment we need
Did, did the creators of this documentary seriously think that giant, multi-ton theropods were capable of jumping several feet into the air like fricking kangaroos!? XD
That gigachad Siats just bodied those 2 Moros like they were just small insects annoying it.
Can't wait for him to roast Amazing Dino World's Pachyrhinosaurus.
That.... thing.... is not a Pachyrhinosaurus, it's an Elasmotherium with a tail. XD
@@cintronproductions9430 nah bro it's the rhino from ice age after getting a mud cast on it's horn.
I had to stop the video to see if Appalachiosaurus was on the family tree and glad to see that it was, mainly as I am always happy that the Alabama Tyrannosaur gets any attention at all.
Another 2 things are Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops weighting 6 tons
And the dumbest gualong and moros i ever seen
Gualong jumping into moving thagomizers and moros trying to scare siats instead of running as fast as they can
Other things i noticed after beacuse my brain was melting: The tails of the Dinosaurs look like can bend till It touches their Heads and Triceratops being fodder and being able to get lifted by 2 lythronax
This is the documentary with the lowest sense of laws of force
10:30
ive seen that guy in a few things including a "rating movie dinosaur scenes" video and he always seems so wholesome. Hes just how a paleontology looks in my head.
I argued w a channel once about T-Rex I said, “there’s no evidence they had feathers “ And channel wouldn’t accept it. Therefore I’m subscribing to this channel 🎉
Love the Dino Doc reviews!
11:46 I just realized that the Lythronax in this show looks exactly like the one in Jurassic World Alive
One thing that you forget to precise in this video, is that the tyrannosaurs genera and species we have in this docmentary, and which not help this latter sadly, is that they are always shown during the CGI sequences attacking other animals or roaring onscreen, like how to show their were badass in real life.
That explain the T-rex duo killing a Siat, being fast runner, and the Matrix slow motion jump when the two T-rex at the end face each others.
The fact that small species such Proceratosaurus, Guanlong and Moros attack bigger dinosaurs such the asiatic stegosaurid or the Siat is also very stupid and unrealistic.
Showing them like mindless creature that want so strongly to fight that they attack at view everything they see without taking into account the size or the environment around them.
We are really completely into a famous common trope that deserve to be reserved for no documentaries productions and not use in a documentary to be sure to have the public's attention.
Also, for a documentary about Tyrannosauroid evolutionary line, we speak mostly about the first members and the T-rex.
Not many about the others Tyrannosaurs.
Sure, it's cool to have mention and apparition of species such the Qianzhousaurus or Nanuqsaurus, and some others, who aren't not so much used in medias regulary.
But most of the species of tyrannosaurs we have here have not many screen time (most of them with only few seconds).
So again, a additional sad point...
That Alabama joke hit me hard in the chest 💀
I suggest using Mogadishu instead.
This blue headed T-Rex is the same from the epic/spectacular 2 part series Amazing DinoWorld !!!
A very awesome series full of outstanding species and designs !!!
This is amazing.
Can you do an accuracy review of prehistoric planet?
I like how you were super apprehensive about ranking this goofy ah documentary.
Who else likes tyrannosaur ancestors more than trex itself
Ever notice he follows great dinosaur documentarys with crappy ones
I love how we went from slow lumbering lizards to over feathered speed demons
May I please have an answer on why David Attenborough's natural history museum alive (2014) hasn't been reviewed.
How about a review of Leaps in Evolution, Dinosaur Superworld, and Out of the Cradle?
Ayo the alabama joke was absolutley savage
The visuals give me MASSIVE Monster Hunter Cutscene vibes
The documentary is the longest offensive meme i have ever seen
It's really like a weird mix of JFC, Dinosaur Revolution and just a weird mix of dinosaur documentary at the time
Overall it's decent and yes this video was really good
Can I suggest these documentaries for the future:
- Extinct (2001 Series)
- Wild New World/Prehistoric America
- Monsters We Met
It’s unfortunate that we never got Lego Batman 2
First dino doc I ever saw. It holds up worse than I ever could have imagined. Glad you got around to it. 15.01 very small nitpick and I’m not positive as to whether there are multiple spellings of it but I believe “veranus” should be spelled “varanus” instead.
I miss prehistoric planet
This "documentary" already looked terrible with ugly T. Rex model but after Prehistoric Planet is just horrendously unwatchable.
Yeah i agree
I don’t agree
2:00 - Holy Jesus, look at it running! Please, have mercy at poor thing's legs!
13:29 - Erm... WTF is this?
Because of those 2 moments I had to watch your video twice. Sorry couldn't listen, was too distracted by that literal hell of animation.
I can imagine the creators of this documentary SQUIRMING as you list off screwup after screwup after screwup!
Do they actually show two Lythronax killing a Siats? Even if that is not supposed to be a Siats but just a lazy reskin, it still makes no sense. Allosaurs (as far as all available evidence shows) died out during the Turonian, about 90 mya, around 10 million years before Lythronax showed up.
6:24
We just need a North American alioramine to be discovered
(And to name it Eunanotyrannus.)
I burst out laughing at the parts where the paleontologists got muted, what the actual heck
Now do a accuracy review of the Scary Monsters arc of Steel Ball Run, please.
ok so how are the hands correct in the early ones then the later ones have jp hands this makes no sense
Hey red, I think I might have a good recommendation(sorry about bugging you about it, I spelled it wrong last time) dinosaurs if the frozen continent-ancient earth
Great Video :)
Could we go back to review Discovery's 2010 docu "Last Day of the Dinosaurs"? The models were reused from "Clash of the Dinosaurs", but maybe their behavior is a little more accurate.
If I had a nickel for every relatively important t-Rex specimen displayed in Illinois, I’d have two nickels, which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice, right?
I loved this documentary when it came out
Just a thing. The unamed tirannosaurid after Guan Long is Xionggualong.
Would you ever consider reviewing Monsters We Met or Wild New World (Prehistoric America)?
Allosaurus fans REEing in the background
the thing about the trike that is hunted by the lythoranx, it could have been a diabloceratops. it have been cool!
also wasnt a paper released this year that placed siats as a non megaraptorid megaraptoran which in turn placed all megaraptorans as tyrannosauroids?
They definitely oversized Siats. It was around the size of the Allosaurus Fragilis- wouldn’t have been much bigger than Lythronax.
Could you do an acuracy review of "when whales Walked" its a prety neat documentary
Seeing feathers on non coelurosaur theropods like siats annoys me
Monsters resurrected: Yea new friend!
Evolutionary journey: Yuck! Get away from me!
“T-Rex: An Evolutionary Journey” (NHK, 2016, 50 minutes) is a One-Shot documentary about the evolution of the Tyrannosaurs family.
Interstingly, despite having been made by the same channel than “Amazing Dino World”, this documentary was made before this latter (being made in 2019, and as an effect, the CGI of the creature, even still correct, is not the exact same, even if most of the design (like the one of the T-rex) remain the same than in the 2019 production.
But like mentioned here, it's impossible and unealistic that a complete full-grown adult T-rex can have feathers all on his body.
So the T-rex of Amazing Dino World are also already at the base completely innacurate.
And mostly due to this re-used action by the creators to use again the same design from this 2016 documentary instead to create new ones.
So yep, the 2010's era in the paleocommunity and media had strongly been marked with the overuse of feathers in any kind of dinosaur belonging to a family in which at least one member was proven to have at least some feathering on him.
With generic fluing bird feathers, not fuzz or proto-feathers, but complete feathers.
For me, a good part of this trope come from the fact that we have been hammered so hard the people/public into their heads that raptors (Dromeosauridae and Troodontidae) have feathers all over their bodies that work too well, and put any kind of feathers in every kind of dinos with at least one member was actually have feathers.
Tyrannosaurid and Therizhiosaurid are good example of that sad bonus effect.
Others such Oviraptosaurid, Ornithomimid and their relatives don't suffers to much thankfully.
Because most of them are small to medium and slender animals, and so, must have teguments to keep them warm.
Only small to lesser medium creatues in every dinosaurs clade or babies/juveniles of big and huge species have feathers, for warm use, and even here, the feathers were mostly see only fuzz or proto-feathers, not true generic feathers.
It's only in the Coelusaurian dinosaurs that true feathers were abundant in almost all the body.
But in many, like for the Oviraptosaurid and Ornithomimid again, true feathers were only present on the arms and tail for sexual mate uses, not for warm use. This latter aspect was made by fuzz on all the dinos body.
Because yes, many dinos in the Coelusaurian have both fuzz on all the body and true feathers in some specific parts.
6:14 you forgot to mention the ankylosaurs fulfilling the medium armored herbivore niche in both continents. Strangely though is that the ceratopsians were more diverse and prevalent in North America, having a huge diversity of both centrosaurs, chasmosaurs and even basal ceratopsians, while from Asia the only big ceratopsian we know of Sinoceratops, with most of the others being basal ceratopsians like protoceratops, koreaceratops and Udanoceratops; I do Wonder why was it the case, however the same can be said about therizinosaurs, with only Nothronychus having notoriety on the New World
3:22 is it just me or did they misspell ornithomimus as ornithomimos
“Hadrosaurs are large herbivores “ thank god.They are always depicted as weak.They grew that way so they can A.run if they must B.fight off what ever was in their environment for example a edmontosaurs grew to its size since it’s slow and can be able to defend itself against T. rex they adapted in a way for a reasons not just some pushovers but something that can be the last thing a predator sees as it dies
Bruh at 18:00 why they toes be looking like elf shoes when they run?
Is Amazing Dinoworld next? You probably won't have to talk about the Tyrannosaurus too much because it's reused from this documentary.
I would give Amazing Dinoworld either a D+ or a C-
Timurlengia wasn't shown living in the Americas but in the bissekty, Uzbekistan plus you gotta understand that Uzbekistan was once under the turguy strait with islands poking out like the Mediterranean or South East Asia.
Most of the dinosaurs have that same Ark Rex pose
Oh boy...get 'em Red!
Rip this show the evolution was great but some stuff meh was ok
Red!like it~that'ss professional ,catch you later!😊
Could you do an accuracy review on the Dino Dan series and the Dino Dana Movie?
the Alabama quote was the funniest thing I've heard today
Didn't this show actually feature a *featherless troodontid* hanging out with overfeathered tyrannosaurs? I once saw a youtube clip like that, where the tyrannosaur designs looked very close to these.
I was wondering when you were going to review this movie
Can you do prehistoric planet? I dont know if it would just, go into s tier or not but id like to see one
What would u say is the overall most accurate dinosaur documentary ever?
What do you think we're Tyrannosaurus having feathers it's okay. It just depends on how you speculate it.
The 2010s were a disaster for feathered dinosaurs. From feathered ceratopsians and feathered sauropods.
I mean, pretty much all documentaries select only the excerpts they want from the experts, and cut the rest, like they can have an hour of interview with the experts to show 5-10 minutes.
The trick is to have a competent editor and not show the part where you've cut the sound ^^'
RRW should review Disney's 2000 film 'Dinosaur', I think it would be a lot of fun for him to rip into it, not only was it my childhood, but it was also extremely inaccurate.
Can you please do last day of the dinosaurs
I can’t believe they got Steve brusatte on this one
13:30 me trying to walk across Legos
I feel like varanus should be split into atleast 3 genera
Yup that is correct. Sorry for the spelling error!
And will u play ark 2 when it comes out and see how accurate the dinosaur are
That T.Rex is the stuff of nightmares
JUST ADD FLOOF!!!!
But...but they are going to die of exposure and overheating!
JUST...ADD...FLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFF!!!!!!
at least Monsters Resurrected isn't alone anymore
Before the Amazing Dinoworld review comes out I want to give out some inaccuracies I found from it.
1. Pronated hands
2. Pachyrhinosaurus
1. Nose horn
2. Thick coat of fur
3. Skull represents the wrong species
4. Appeared around 70-69 mya not 66 mya
5. Size around 16ft/5m not around 23ft/7m?
3. Troodon
1. The Genus is invalid
2. Live in a pack
4. Avimimus
1. No tail or it’s too small
5. Zanabazar
1. Snouts are too deep
6. Protoceratops
1. Lived around 75-71 mya not 66 mya
7. Halszkaraptor
1. Lived around 75-71 mya not 66 mya
8. Tyrannosaurids
1. T.Rex and Tarbosaurus are feathered
2. Tarbosaurus skull
3. Tarbosaurus is 12m not 10m
4. Tarbosaurus and T.Rex pack hunts
5. T.rex upright position for a moment
9. Rugops
1. Feathers
2. Stated as Abeilosaurus
10. Spinosaurus
1. Knuckle walk?
11. Tambatitanis
1. Macronarians = no rearing up on the back legs
2. Lived around 112-109 mya not 66 mya
3. Lived in Japan not North America
12. Kamuysaurus
1. Lived in Japan not North America
2. Called Hadrosaurus
3. Lived around 72-70 mya not 66 mya
13.Azhdarcho
1. Lived in Asia not North America
2. Lived around 92 mya not 66 mya
14. Deinocheirus
1. Juveniles look like copies of the adults?
Is there anything I missed or got incorrect? Please let me know.
Man Hope It gets F its Just trex an evolutionary journey with extra Inacuraccies i hate How they recycle the models from TAEJ for T.rex as Instead of doing more research and learning with their errors
Probably the next documentary they make they are gonna travel to paleozoic oceans and we see a trex before diving in the water and basilosaurus hunting anomalocaris
11:45 When a dinosaur is feathers galore
Think it’d be cool if you reviewed Dino Dan, it’s not a documentary but it is part of my childhood