Excellent discussions by the learned people who are renowned experts in the subject. Thank you, Sibal saheb, for coordination and keeping the discussions meaningful.
Why diversity finished in Kashmir valley ??? What happened in Ajmer in1991-92 ??? What happened with Nikita Tomar, Ria Goutam, Shraddha Walkar, Tanishka Sharma, Sonam Sukla, Dali Barman, Sakshi, Nency Verma, Neha Hiremath ???? What is happening in various parts of West Bengal, Kerala, Karnataka, Telangana, Tamil Nadu ????
I started watching the show thinking i will criticize Sibal as being biased since UCC is required and he is politicizing the issue. By the end of the show i realized that it was me who was biased due to pre-meditated opinion about Sibal.
"Faizan sir and Kapil Sibal sir, both are needed by the country. You discuss in the interest of the nation and its citizens, and we get inspiration, knowledge, and information from you. Thank you for that."
@@Grandpost11 sahi kuch log yhi to chshte h yahi to unki sajish h wo 10+10 bacche janwaro ki tarah paida kre or sarkar unke baccho ko pale or wo log aise hi hinduo k tax par palte palte apni population badhake desh ki demography badal de jaise kerela Assam bengal ki badal di hai north east ko barbaad kar diya h
Please note that the Hindu Marriage Act is so North India dominated that the entire South Indian custom of marrying first cousins has been saved by a proviso
Wire podcasts and episodes are wonderful Wire invites all people of same ideology no opposition views this is called good debates Why do you not invite other people like harish ,j sai deepak
Faizan ji , has beautiful compilation of legal and judicial doctrine analysis.....anyone who is interested can watch, sir has his own channel....thanks sibal ji
@@krishanuadityapandey4414 Sariya law? Haz? Mere pyare bhai, samajh to baad mein aayegi, pehle thik se bolna or Likhna toh sikh lo. And by the by, if you listened to the talk, there are other communities which "ainjay espesial raights" such as the tribals, adivasis, goan christians, parsis - even if you leave out the HUF laws....
Jab savidhan likha gya usme bhi saf likha gya ki aage chalke bharat me ucc sarkaro ko lagu karna hoga congress ki jab sarkar thi tab Supreme Court ne kai bar bola tha ki UCC lagu karo lekin neech congress ne nhi lagu kiya
I agree bjp intent is divide what about so called secular parties cpim dmk cong why cant they bring draft in there states and show to others how it is done from discussion it appears the onus is on bjp for uniform civil code why secular parties not owning and letting bjp to communalise narrative
Excellent discussion and a must watch to understand the politics behind current UCC narrative which is bereft of any honest intention to ring in meaningful change
Mr Sibal never supports any reform or Government policies or what Govt is trying to do to bring justice to helpless people. Everything he sees politically motivated. As a cabinet minister in Congress, what did he do to bring reform in the society. It takes courage and big head and heart to bring any reform. For Mr Sibal, living in primitive age with primitive culture is perfect. I wish he could use his talent to support healthy reforms in India. Did any of these 4 people send their comments to Uttarakhand when the Govt invited there? Any street person can criticize any govt action. Even a paan vala knows how to run the country and what is wrong with the system except he does not know how to make a good Paan.
"The Constitution is not what the Constitution says, but Constitution is what the Supreme Court says it says" - Justice Anthony Scalia, United States Supreme Court
All issues have either a bearing and/or an impact in the political sphere, when they are "reforming" or changing existing laws. The timing of these proposals bear witness to it.
Uniform civil code of BJP is a facade to get Hindu votes by saying to them that we have imposed the Hindu practices in their personal lives, thus imposing hindu culture, practices and thinking in islamic practices of Indian muslims. If a few other countries have UCC, the purpose of having it was not vindictive against a religious group.
V enlightening . Sir kapil Sharma, inspite of yr honest and highly professional reasoning and yr opinion on UCC is justified and fair, you will be judged as political yr conclusion that government intention is targeted towards one Muslim community to get vote by anti Muslim agenda .
It will help your listeners understand the issue resolution process better if you do add the steps being taken both in Parliament and through legal recourse by you and your panelist’s ! So do please add to all your discussions the possible curative measures that need to be / are being proposed by you at the end of every discussion! You do correctly outline and explain the problems & issues however society at large needs to understand the corrective action plan which may also require building up Public support through awareness
There's no dearth of wise people in India, but the reins of power are in to the hands of those who want to arbitrarily divide the nation. I agree with these noble people. Any law made should be inclusive, compatible with the constitution, and universally acceptable. If the Govt has intentions, they will pick a particular debatable issue and work in a piecemeal manner, as Faizan sahab said. I wish to see an India which talks about unity, rather than uniformity that is divisive...
Mr. Kapil Sibal, I am not a student of Law, but I listen attentive ly when ever you speak on Law.. I respect you Sir. From370 to Babri Masjid your arguments are in right direction. I suspect, citing(?) the Judgement' of J&K any state of India can be made Union Territory! (?) As a common man I don't know whether Sree Ram, is a historical person - is any evidence thereof?. If any Judgement' is on the basis of emotions of majority - how far it justifiable (?). You are great Sir, but it pains me when you speak for mamata Banerjee, CM WB. Especially when you defend Mamata Banerjee's Govt. in the recent Dr.- Murder, case. sorry Sir, I respect you.
Whether Sri Ram is historical or not can't be said definitely, but by standard historical evidentiary regulations, we can't argue positively for his existence.
Dear Mr. Sibal, When you are advocating in favour of Mr. Ajay Piramal (in the DHFL scam cases) and WB Government (in the RG Kar Case), I am bewildered enough as to the nature of your shifting political ambiguities or acts of equivocation. It cannot be forgotten that Mr. Piramal is a crony ally of the BJP. Hence, what is your political stand in the context of your legal stand, after all? I understand that it is not the question of lawful justice for all anymore, but solely a phenomenon of "money matters!" It is no wonder that in India, the poor get gallows, whilst the superrich (with legal conflicts, e.g., Mr. Piramal) can hire you to escape from trial.
Why do these untrustworthy people give lectures? If common civil code is not possible, even, the constitution could not have been possible, Mr High paid lawyer.
Muslim ne pehle dharam k naam par batwara kiya 2 muslims desh le liya uske bad bhi 70% muslims bharat m reh gye badi chalaki se ye log bharat par bhi apni chalana chahte h 😢😢😢😢
The tyranny of the majority (or the tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate exclusively pursues its own objectives at the expense of the minority factions.
So the discussion about ucc became a match to find fault with Hindu practices. Not a word on Muslim crooked practices , be it polygamy or no maintenance post Divorce. Like everyone is playing to gallery. What I do agree with is that every personal law requires tweaking so as to make it fair and just. A law cannot to allowed to operate merely because some sage or scholar in ancient time when there was no renaissance, said it to be correct. Times have changed and we as intelligent beings need to change with time . Uniformity is not really very important rather reformation is important. Quite agree with Faisan sahab when he says that every law needs to be in conformity with constitution
But the original Gandhi himself said Hindu-muslim unity is never a possibility. Opposing the Resolution for Poorna Swaraj passed by the All India Congress Session, he, pressing for only dominion status, speaks as follows: “Friends, all I want to say to you in English is that the levity with which that proposition has been taken by some of you has grieved me. It has grieved me because it shows lack of responsibility. "Who is here who can say today with confidence : "Yes Hindu-Muslim unity has become an indissoluble factor of Indian Nationalism ?’ Who is here who can tell me that the Parsis and the Christians and the Jews about whom you heard this afternoon-who will tell me that those very people will not rise against any such idea? Let us not go into waters whose depths we do not know". The Original Gandhi implies here that Muslims and other minorities won't accept being ruled by the Hindus. Gandhi himself impliedly dismisses the comparison made here with the US or UK where Muslims won't dare challenge their authority and their constitutional laws. Thank God the nation didn't face the accident of one panelist becoming a judge and ended up here where she rightly belongs.
Politicians (not all and there are exceptions) are like villains in movies,they talk about something for public consumption hiding their real intentions and do the opposite behind
So-called secular political parties treat only Musalman as first class citizens through Haz Subsidy, Madrasa Education, Wakf Bord, Sariya Law, Unlawful Reservation for Musalman and treat all other communities as second class citizens in the name of secularism . This is why Hindurashtra is essential for protection of rights of all other communities.
Sold out people why don't you 4 bring out a draft that is far sighted acceptable to all not with elections in mind instead of toeing muslim line. Introduce it in parliament. You are an MP.
Did you listen to the entire conversation? Are you aware of the actual context of the discussion? Laws are crafted to deliver justice, not to cater to whims, fancies, of Indivisuals.
@@mohammedmurtaza3257 Anyone who argues that collective rights are higher than individual is not a proponent of Liberty, but Authoritarian. Individual rights are supreme, not collective in a liberal democracy. Learn Liberty. No democracy has different laws for different religions. In fact religion should never be a part of public laws. Your comment is immature and lack enlightenment
@@subhrajitgupta5535 The governing authorities are misleading citizens by selectively crafting laws. For example, in Uttarakhand, it would be worth examining who all are exempted from these regulations.
@@mohammedmurtaza3257 I dont support BJPs way of bringing UCC. BJP is a despotic party. They are doing this to show muslims that their laws will no longer hold. What you need is a draft and bring as many people you can, and end religion once in for all in public life. Uttarakhand has brought a rule that would require couples to register, which is illiberal as hell. I am totally against it and against BJPs way of briinging UCC which surely targets muslims. But on the other hand we have to bring UCC. For me there are no Hindus or muslims. We are all Indians, and that should be very clear in a democracy that fundamental rights cannot be compromised by cultural practises be it any religion.
Desh n sirf ek dharam k log 4 bibi ek sath rakhe kya ye equality h bolo hindu 2-3 or Muslims 10-10 bacche dashko se paida kar rahe hai ye kya equality h bolo isi bajah se bharat k kai states m demography change ho chuki h
Tribals are specifically protected for land ownership .No such protection for Muslims because of tribals 'situation .Similarly protection from UCC.Muslims oppose even triple talak and Shahabano judgement.
अभी मुंबई हाई कोर्ट ने कहा था की किसी मुस्लिम बच्ची की शादी इस नाम।पर १८ से कम।पर उस लिए नहीं की जा सकती क्योंकि वह मुस्लिम है उस सामान्य वैवाहिक नियम लागू होगा।
@@Grandpost11 In similar way as happened in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan and even in Kashmir. As happened in Ajmer in 1991-92 . As happening in various parts of West Bengal, Jharkhand, Kerala, Karnataka, Telangana, Tamil Nadu.....
If No Uniform Civil Code As Per Interpretation Of Constitution Then How We Call A Secular Constitution And State,Please Give Full Definition Of Secularism If All Of You Are So Well Versed With The Constitution Of India.
Musalman already took separate homeland for themselves but we, the Hindus should not demand homeland for ourselves !!!! Musalman should get special treatment as Haz Subsidy, Madrasa Education, Wakf Bord, Sariya Law in India !!!! What a bullshit double standard .
In front of Kapil never show any disrespect to the peacefiul community and its followers or else you will (especially Hindus) have to pay a heavy price. Remember these discussion Indian citizens the next time you go to the polling booth.
Mam talk about Bangladeshi hindus the peaceful community of muslim are cutting down the hindus thread of god and then offering them relief same side iskon temple was offering food to all without asking religion what you will say on it
Why only muslims are in minority first define the religious minority. In my opinion, only 5% and below be accepted. Muslims had been problems in India for centuries so India is forced to reform our laws keeping the conditions of hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Mr sibal is outstanding outspoken brave ace speaker and honest law wizard.l like immensely his efforts.
Excellent discussions by the learned people who are renowned experts in the subject. Thank you, Sibal saheb, for coordination and keeping the discussions meaningful.
Absolutely intelligent, fairly balanced and well nuanced discussion by these eminent jurists. Only Kapil Sibal can hold such a fruitful discussion.
Laws are for people , not people are for laws. Unity in diversity is our maxim
Why diversity finished in Kashmir valley ???
What happened in Ajmer in1991-92 ???
What happened with Nikita Tomar, Ria Goutam, Shraddha Walkar, Tanishka Sharma, Sonam Sukla, Dali Barman, Sakshi, Nency Verma, Neha Hiremath ????
What is happening in various parts of West Bengal, Kerala, Karnataka, Telangana, Tamil Nadu ????
BHU rapists given bail “shocking” where is happening first see to all this
What about momin khadems of Ajmer Sharif Dargah ????
Pappu on bail isn't shocking?
I started watching the show thinking i will criticize Sibal as being biased since UCC is required and he is politicizing the issue. By the end of the show i realized that it was me who was biased due to pre-meditated opinion about Sibal.
Faizan Sahab was outstanding in his discussions when he describe the difference between sharia and Muslim personal law.
It was a much needed informative eye opening show for prejudiced people,racists and religious supremacists.
"Faizan sir and Kapil Sibal sir, both are needed by the country. You discuss in the interest of the nation and its citizens, and we get inspiration, knowledge, and information from you. Thank you for that."
Kapil Sibal zindabad thanks to your Channel very interesting information
Excellent discussion by the best legal experts
A uniform food ,residence and job avaiblity first priority needed immediately........
How 2 bacvhe walo or 10 bacche walo ko equaly sab kaise mil sakta h
@@Vhshjvbjbcch3457, milna to chahiye kyu k sab indian citizen hi hai. 2 bacche ho ya 10 kisi par koi gunah nai hai.
@@Grandpost11 sahi kuch log yhi to chshte h yahi to unki sajish h wo 10+10 bacche janwaro ki tarah paida kre or sarkar unke baccho ko pale or wo log aise hi hinduo k tax par palte palte apni population badhake desh ki demography badal de jaise kerela Assam bengal ki badal di hai north east ko barbaad kar diya h
Those who have problem with secular law they already took separate homeland for themselves and so they should leave India immediately.
@@krishanuadityapandey4414, those who took separate land that belongs to them. India belongs to Indians.
Please note that the Hindu Marriage Act is so North India dominated that the entire South Indian custom of marrying first cousins has been saved by a proviso
That's a recipe of genetic disorder, must be stopped now.
Wire podcasts and episodes are wonderful
Wire invites all people of same ideology no opposition views this is called good debates
Why do you not invite other people like harish ,j sai deepak
This is modern India. No special laws for "special communities!
Thn why not abolishing HUF ???
उत्तराखंड समान नागरिक संहिता पूरे देश में लागू होना चाहिए।
Faizan ji , has beautiful compilation of legal and judicial doctrine analysis.....anyone who is interested can watch, sir has his own channel....thanks sibal ji
Appreciate .Very useful discussion
Law should be same for all communities not what is happening these days! We are taking about upcoming law …
Should a particular community enjoy special rights as Haz Subsidy, Madrasa Education, Wakf Bord, Sariya Law as happened in the name of secularism ????
@@krishanuadityapandey4414 Sariya law? Haz? Mere pyare bhai, samajh to baad mein aayegi, pehle thik se bolna or Likhna toh sikh lo. And by the by, if you listened to the talk, there are other communities which "ainjay espesial raights" such as the tribals, adivasis, goan christians, parsis - even if you leave out the HUF laws....
@@rayzimmerman6740 lol 😂😂
Which special rights enjoyed by any other community ????
Nothing !!!!
Faizan mustafa aspiires for a higher position .
Jab savidhan likha gya usme bhi saf likha gya ki aage chalke bharat me ucc sarkaro ko lagu karna hoga congress ki jab sarkar thi tab Supreme Court ne kai bar bola tha ki UCC lagu karo lekin neech congress ne nhi lagu kiya
Very great discussion....nice information given by honourable guests
Thank you, all. A very interesting and informative discussion!
I agree bjp intent is divide what about so called secular parties cpim dmk cong why cant they bring draft in there states and show to others how it is done from discussion it appears the onus is on bjp for uniform civil code why secular parties not owning and letting bjp to communalise narrative
One of the best Video titles ever.
Excellent discussion and a must watch to understand the politics behind current UCC narrative which is bereft of any honest intention to ring in meaningful change
Life of people in our Nation is deep and dynamic and self regulation is inherent in itself. Discussion and debate cannot change it .
Sirgee salute to all of you very niece to listen to all you. Our best regards to intelligent people of india .Sirgee we respect all of you.
Jai hind
Mr Sibal never supports any reform or Government policies or what Govt is trying to do to bring justice to helpless people. Everything he sees politically motivated.
As a cabinet minister in Congress, what did he do to bring reform in the society.
It takes courage and big head and heart to bring any reform.
For Mr Sibal, living in primitive age with primitive culture is perfect.
I wish he could use his talent to support healthy reforms in India.
Did any of these 4 people send their comments to Uttarakhand when the Govt invited there?
Any street person can criticize any govt action. Even a paan vala knows how to run the country and what is wrong with the system except he does not know how to make a good Paan.
"The Constitution is not what the Constitution says, but Constitution is what the Supreme Court says it says" - Justice Anthony Scalia, United States Supreme Court
I agree with Meenakshi ji, UCC should be Apolitical.
Highly excellent conversation
Creative and best intention ❤❤❤❤❤❤
Great team congratulations to all
Politically driven discussions on an apolitical issue.
All issues have either a bearing and/or an impact in the political sphere, when they are "reforming" or changing existing laws. The timing of these proposals bear witness to it.
Uniform civil code of BJP is a facade to get Hindu votes by saying to them that we have imposed the Hindu practices in their personal lives, thus imposing hindu culture, practices and thinking in islamic practices of Indian muslims. If a few other countries have UCC, the purpose of having it was not vindictive against a religious group.
Great discussion 👏 👏
V enlightening . Sir kapil Sharma, inspite of yr honest and highly professional reasoning and yr opinion on UCC is justified and fair, you will be judged as political yr conclusion that government intention is targeted towards one Muslim community to get vote by anti Muslim agenda .
Well discussed issues in detail one Nation one law,
Excellent Conversation
Boycott Kapil Sibal for defending the West Bengal government.
Yes, but dont talk about up, mp, उत्तराखंड, and thane rape cases.
It will help your listeners understand the issue resolution process better if you do add the steps being taken both in Parliament and through legal recourse by you and your panelist’s !
So do please add to all your discussions the possible curative measures that need to be / are being proposed by you at the end of every discussion!
You do correctly outline and explain the problems & issues however society at large needs to understand the corrective action plan which may also require building up Public support through awareness
Abhishek Manu ji's CD is trending..nice culture nice Trend..keep the finger on the lip is a great journalism.
It was fake
@@mdumairmdumair5183 Before responding, please check with the high court order about it . Just a national shame .
भारतमा न्याय प्रणाली
न्यायलयको सम्पूर्ण खर्च जनताले व्यहोर्नुपर्छ, निर्णय भारतीय भाषामा ननिक्लदा , अन्यायको महसुस भइनै रहेका छ ।
There's no dearth of wise people in India, but the reins of power are in to the hands of those who want to arbitrarily divide the nation.
I agree with these noble people. Any law made should be inclusive, compatible with the constitution, and universally acceptable. If the Govt has intentions, they will pick a particular debatable issue and work in a piecemeal manner, as Faizan sahab said.
I wish to see an India which talks about unity, rather than uniformity that is divisive...
Mr. Kapil Sibal, I am not a student of Law, but I listen attentive ly when ever you speak on Law.. I respect you Sir. From370 to Babri Masjid your arguments are in right direction. I suspect, citing(?) the Judgement' of J&K any state of India can be made Union Territory! (?) As a common man I don't know whether Sree Ram, is a historical person - is any evidence thereof?. If any Judgement' is on the basis of emotions of majority - how far it justifiable (?). You are great Sir, but it pains me when you speak for mamata Banerjee, CM WB. Especially when you defend Mamata Banerjee's Govt. in the recent Dr.- Murder, case. sorry Sir, I respect you.
Whether Sri Ram is historical or not can't be said definitely, but by standard historical evidentiary regulations, we can't argue positively for his existence.
Excellent debate by intellectuals
He is topmost adv in country, pity on he is unable to pronounce gurujis name he is calling gowalkar instead of Golwalkar
Muslims k liye ya to poora shariya kanoon lagu ho ya poora ucc lagu ho
Dear Mr. Sibal,
When you are advocating in favour of Mr. Ajay Piramal (in the DHFL scam cases) and WB Government (in the RG Kar Case), I am bewildered enough as to the nature of your shifting political ambiguities or acts of equivocation. It cannot be forgotten that Mr. Piramal is a crony ally of the BJP. Hence, what is your political stand in the context of your legal stand, after all? I understand that it is not the question of lawful justice for all anymore, but solely a phenomenon of "money matters!" It is no wonder that in India, the poor get gallows, whilst the superrich (with legal conflicts, e.g., Mr. Piramal) can hire you to escape from trial.
Protect our constitution
Change the constitution which is anti hindu
By banning majhab spreading hatred as jihad, jizya tax, maal-e-ganimat and so on.
Why do these untrustworthy people give lectures?
If common civil code is not possible, even, the constitution could not have been possible, Mr High paid lawyer.
Support the country you live or live in a country you Support.
❤ Most humans eat beef. So you get out of this earth. Support truth and justice, not narrow boundaries made by men
Faizaan saab is the most intellectual person on reform that one can come across.
IF NOT ONE LAW FOR ALL HOW ONE JUSTICE FOR ALL Mr KAPIL ?
Muslim ne pehle dharam k naam par batwara kiya 2 muslims desh le liya uske bad bhi 70% muslims bharat m reh gye badi chalaki se ye log bharat par bhi apni chalana chahte h 😢😢😢😢
Law and justice are often at odds with each other.
Kapila argument t is sheer sonsense
The tyranny of the majority (or the tyranny of the masses) is an inherent weakness to majority rule in which the majority of an electorate exclusively pursues its own objectives at the expense of the minority factions.
One law for all, justice for all
So the discussion about ucc became a match to find fault with Hindu practices. Not a word on Muslim crooked practices , be it polygamy or no maintenance post Divorce. Like everyone is playing to gallery. What I do agree with is that every personal law requires tweaking so as to make it fair and just. A law cannot to allowed to operate merely because some sage or scholar in ancient time when there was no renaissance, said it to be correct. Times have changed and we as intelligent beings need to change with time . Uniformity is not really very important rather reformation is important. Quite agree with Faisan sahab when he says that every law needs to be in conformity with constitution
Mr Sibal is right intent is Hindu - Muslim and vote ..
Sir, the community cannot take a stand everyone is scared ....
Hatred as jihad, jizya tax, maal-e-ganimat are completely against the constitution.
And so majhab spreading such hatred should be banned in India.
Abbe phirse? Bas kar baba.
@@rayzimmerman6740 Har roj panch wakt chilla chilla ke nafrat kon failata hai ?????
suspicion of beef ke naam pe lynching kaun karta hai, apne andar ki nafrat kabhi nahi dikhaya degi tumhe.
@@relaxationmusic7608 Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan aur Kashmir mein itne badsaluki ke baad kya ummid karte ho ????
Ajmer mein hazaron ladkiyon ke jindagi barbad karne ke baad kya ummid karte ho ????
Har saal Nikita Tomar, Ria Goutam, Shraddha Walkar, Tanishka Sharma, Sonam Sukla, Dali Barman, Sakshi, Nency Verma, Neha Hiremath jaise hazaron ladkiyon ki katal karne ke baad kya ummid karte ho ????
But the original Gandhi himself said Hindu-muslim unity is never a possibility.
Opposing the Resolution for Poorna Swaraj passed by the All India Congress Session, he, pressing for only dominion status, speaks as follows:
“Friends, all I want to say to you in English is that the levity with which that proposition has been taken by some of you has grieved me. It has grieved me because it shows lack of responsibility.
"Who is here who can say today with confidence :
"Yes Hindu-Muslim unity has become an indissoluble factor of Indian Nationalism ?’
Who is here who can tell me that the Parsis and the Christians and the Jews about whom you heard this afternoon-who will tell me that those very people will not rise against any such idea? Let us not go into waters whose depths we do not know".
The Original Gandhi implies here that Muslims and other minorities won't accept being ruled by the Hindus.
Gandhi himself impliedly dismisses the comparison made here with the US or UK where Muslims won't dare challenge their authority and their constitutional laws.
Thank God the nation didn't face the accident of one panelist becoming a judge and ended up here where she rightly belongs.
Only one law for all.
Ek taraf bharat ka muslim bolta h hum savidhan ko manege lekin usi savidhan mein UCC bhi h usko ye nhi manege what a hypocrisy shame on you
Politicians (not all and there are exceptions) are like villains in movies,they talk about something for public consumption hiding their real intentions and do the opposite behind
Rights of women supreme in this nation.
I am secular. I support secular uniform code 😂😂
So-called secular political parties treat only Musalman as first class citizens through Haz Subsidy, Madrasa Education, Wakf Bord, Sariya Law, Unlawful Reservation for Musalman and treat all other communities as second class citizens in the name of secularism .
This is why Hindurashtra is essential for protection of rights of all other communities.
Accha ab "Bord"🤣 ki spelling bhi battani padegi. Chatti fail ho ka, Lalla?
@@rayzimmerman6740 Spelling le ke kiu itna obsessed ho ???
Kiu ki baaton ko counter karne ke liye koi logic nahi hai .👍
Sold out people why don't you 4 bring out a draft that is far sighted acceptable to all not with elections in mind instead of toeing muslim line. Introduce it in parliament. You are an MP.
Yaar dunia mei kitne dharam h koi polygamy ke liye itna nhi ladte h na aisa karte h jaise ye log bilkul pagla gye hain ki polygamy hi chahiye inko
Justice without the law 😧
Im a Liberal and therefore I support UCC.
Did you listen to the entire conversation? Are you aware of the actual context of the discussion? Laws are crafted to deliver justice, not to cater to whims, fancies, of Indivisuals.
@@mohammedmurtaza3257 Laws should be created to impose Islam on India !!!!!
@@mohammedmurtaza3257 Anyone who argues that collective rights are higher than individual is not a proponent of Liberty, but Authoritarian. Individual rights are supreme, not collective in a liberal democracy. Learn Liberty. No democracy has different laws for different religions. In fact religion should never be a part of public laws. Your comment is immature and lack enlightenment
@@subhrajitgupta5535 The governing authorities are misleading citizens by selectively crafting laws. For example, in Uttarakhand, it would be worth examining who all are exempted from these regulations.
@@mohammedmurtaza3257 I dont support BJPs way of bringing UCC. BJP is a despotic party. They are doing this to show muslims that their laws will no longer hold. What you need is a draft and bring as many people you can, and end religion once in for all in public life. Uttarakhand has brought a rule that would require couples to register, which is illiberal as hell. I am totally against it and against BJPs way of briinging UCC which surely targets muslims.
But on the other hand we have to bring UCC.
For me there are no Hindus or muslims. We are all Indians, and that should be very clear in a democracy that fundamental rights cannot be compromised by cultural practises be it any religion.
Is there justice and equality without uniformity in laws?
Divide and rule is the main motive nothing else
Desh n sirf ek dharam k log 4 bibi ek sath rakhe kya ye equality h bolo hindu 2-3 or Muslims 10-10 bacche dashko se paida kar rahe hai ye kya equality h bolo isi bajah se bharat k kai states m demography change ho chuki h
Tribals are specifically protected for land ownership .No such protection for Muslims because of tribals 'situation .Similarly protection from UCC.Muslims oppose even triple talak and Shahabano judgement.
अभी मुंबई हाई कोर्ट ने कहा था की किसी मुस्लिम बच्ची की शादी इस नाम।पर १८ से कम।पर उस लिए नहीं की जा सकती क्योंकि वह मुस्लिम है उस सामान्य वैवाहिक नियम लागू होगा।
Kya hindu 4.bibi or 20-25 bacche karte h example dikhao hm bhi example dikhaenge hmare pass m log rehte h 2 bibi 14 bacche can u believe 😂😂😂
female panelist n 3 baar bola i am feminist , like her point wont be accepted if she won't say iam feminist
संविधान में धारा ४४ में साफ साफ कहा गया है की सामान नागरिक संहिता बनाई जाए।
When the political class talks casually it's a listening piece for the ordinary.
Ouch!
The anamolies in Hindu laws should be highlighted by media publicity.
धार्मिक अधिकार के नाम।पर किसी महिला अधिकारों का दमन नहीं कर सकते।
Bangladesh Supreme Court woman Judge was forced to wear a Burqa after Shaikh Hassena was driven out of the country. Do we want this in India ?
How will it happen.
@@Grandpost11 In similar way as happened in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan and even in Kashmir.
As happened in Ajmer in 1991-92 .
As happening in various parts of West Bengal, Jharkhand, Kerala, Karnataka, Telangana, Tamil Nadu.....
Ye pm ko jail me dalo, isne Shivaji Maharaj ka khoon kiya he ! Being Hindu, I can’t tolerate this pm, who insulted my God. Jail him, no pardon.
It is an action against a particular community or religion.They are only concerned about their vote bank
Were hindus consulted before enacting hindu code bill,
If No Uniform Civil Code As Per Interpretation Of Constitution Then How We Call A Secular Constitution And State,Please Give Full Definition Of Secularism If All Of You Are So Well Versed With The Constitution Of India.
Itne vidvaan baith ke charcha kr rahe hai
Jub parliament me women itni kum hain to unke favor me law kon banega😅
जय संविधान, सत्यमेव जयते.
Musalman already took separate homeland for themselves but we, the Hindus should not demand homeland for ourselves !!!!
Musalman should get special treatment as Haz Subsidy, Madrasa Education, Wakf Bord, Sariya Law in India !!!!
What a bullshit double standard .
संविधान की धारा १५ में साफ साफ कहा गया है की कानून सब के के लिए समान हो गा।
First try to get justice in a normal police station and court then reach UCC
'रूल आफ ला' नाम की भैंस तो पानी में चली गयी।
In front of Kapil never show any disrespect to the peacefiul community and its followers or else you will (especially Hindus) have to pay a heavy price. Remember these discussion Indian citizens the next time you go to the polling booth.
Mam talk about Bangladeshi hindus the peaceful community of muslim are cutting down the hindus thread of god and then offering them relief same side iskon temple was offering food to all without asking religion what you will say on it
Good point but those religious extremists are unable to talk on this topic.
Why only muslims are in minority first define the religious minority. In my opinion, only 5% and below be accepted. Muslims had been problems in India for centuries so India is forced to reform our laws keeping the conditions of hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Idhar bhi Rapid Fire? Ja game khel...
Law are made for justice to all if not fulfilling than it is not law