I got this lens yesterday, went out with it, and was very impressed by its great performance. I had a doubt about sharpness, but it is OK, also sharpness at 300mm is very, very good. And IS works excellent. I constantly got sharp images at 300mm with 1/80 and even with 1/40. That is the right lens for my shooting style. And it is a compact lens - that's important to me. Good option, if You don't need a faster aperture. Canon, respect!
If you're looking for a Nikon equivalent, the Tamron 70-300 VC USD seems very similar performance as this lens and is actually a bit less expensive. Chris did a review for it a while ago.
Your reviews are great. When ever I am on the fence about a lens I hope you've reviewed it. I just bought this lens and I have been very happy with it. It's plenty sharp for me, the overall build is very nice although I find the LCD to be a huge gimmick lol Autofocus is crazy fast! My 24-105 f4L seems like a slouch in comparison. Thanks for inspiring me to try it out. I was just going to get the version 1 used and save some money but I'm glad I bought the newer one.
Hi Chris, I bought a copy of this lens this week and it's very good, I see some new perspective in super zoom conditions. Thanks for guiding me through buying it
This one is a Full-frame. If you have a mirrorless camera and use a speed booster with this one, you can turn this lens into a great expensive telephoto zoom lens at a fraction of the price of the more expensive one.
Hey Christopher, Thank you very much for this great review of the newest Canon 70-300mm NANO lens. I am very pleased with the so fastest focusing system and all but I really like the cool old brick building you use to show the sharpness of the lenses as the other test with the cluster of pictures looks to have less contrast. But, the lens looks very great and a super winner in my mind!!! I'd really love to see the canon 18-135mm NANO and the new Tamron 18-400mm lens. We know you'll get her done soon. Thank you again!!! You're the best!!!
Hey Christopher, I have got to say that from what I've seen, I think the Canon 55-250mm IS STM lens sharpness is actually quite a bit better than the new 70-300mm NANO. Man, that little 55-250mm Is STM is the sharpest Canon zoom lens I've ever seen tested. Too bad it's not a 55-300mm for the extra reach.
While I don't have this specific one, so comparing it to Tamron's 70-300, the additional range in the bottom of the range more than makes up for the missing 50mm at the top. The difference between 250mm and 300mm is very little while 70 mm with APS-C is very zoomed in already.
@@christopherfrost I'm very confused. In your 55-250 STM review you say that it is "razor sharp" repeatedly and by f/8 "pin sharp". In this review on APSC, you say the lens is "okay in the middle", "a touch soft in the corners" and you need to stop down to f/11 for best quality at 300mm. Yet now you say they're comparable in terms of sharpness. The only reason I'm even looking at the 70-300 is that the focus breathing of the 55-250 means that for close up wildlife you just don't have the reach. I just can't justify stepping up to the L, but I'm not sure if I'll be going backwards. I shoot Nikon too, and I love the older AFS 70-300 VR and the new DX 70-300 VR lenses are even sharper (but not parfocal and also have issues focus breathing and reach close up)
Brohan89 Why doesn’t it show the exact focal length though? That’s precisely what I’d want from a display right there. There’s no room to print that detail and it isn’t a linear transition either. Since the lens knows it’s focal length (shows up in EXIF data) what the fudge happened? That live level meter is beyond useless as is the DoF scale, since it isn’t high-res enough to really inform you of anything important. Honestly, i can’t believe it simply mirrors what is printed on the barrel. 🤪
Wow, about 20 years ago I picked up a used 75-300 4.5-5.6 IS USM and still have it. It's a slug and I can manual focus faster than the Auto focus but, it has served me well. It's still in use and fortunately software can correct the chromatic aberrations. For a first generation IS lens it was a game changer. Looks like the 75-300mm range has only gotten better.
I used to own a 55-250 STM on a 80D and now I own a 70-300mII on an EOS-R and I think it's a draw between these two. But the EOS-R is FF of course. So I expect the 70-300 to be a little less sharp than the 55-250 on an APS-C body. I have always thought the 55-250 STM to be unbeatable at that price, size and weight. So I wouldn't even consider it an 'upgrade', except for the little bit of extra zoom.
Is the Canon 55 to 250 lens sharper than this 70 to 300. I have the 55 to 250 and it is very sharp so I don't want to trade it in for an additional 50 mm unless this new 70-300 is a lot sharper thanks for all your great videos. I use the 77 D camera
i got this lens after looking around a bit and finding your video having used it for a few years ive really enjoyed this lens i use it all the time, an incredible lens in my opinion especially for the price,
fantastic video! ive been looking for a zoom lens for my 77d for a while, the other day I was chatting with canon on their live chat and the reps over there really helped me narrow down my choice to this lens, which led me to your video! after that review it looks like im going to pick one up thanks!
Hi Christopher. After seeing your review (and a few others for Tamron, Sigma, etc.) I've bought the Canon EF 70-300 F4-5.6 IS II USM zoom lens, yesterday. I am using it with a Canon EOS M6 and I am testing it today. It's working quite nice. I need to resolve the footing for the tripod, since the adapter is not fitted with the tripod screw. Thank you, for posting, it was really helpful.
Good afternoon, Chris. I'm a director and cinematographer from the U.S. I like to put a great deal of effort into scoping out the lenses that best suit my needs for an affordable price, as utilizing various focal lengths to serve a story is one of my favorite aspects of cinematography. Your channel has helped me out a great deal in the few months that I've been following you, and its played a direct factor in my selection of several excellent lenses. There's plenty out there that I'm curious to see reviews for. If you don't mind, I'd love to drop in from time to time with some requests for specific lenses. Your channel is by far the most well-formatted, well-organized, and generally charming and approachable review outlet I've ever found for lenses. I've come to trust your opinion considerably. Keep up the great work!
Thanks for the kind message - I'm glad you find the reviews helpful! I receive requests to test specific lenses all the time. Unfortunately I can't cover them all because I'm under huge time pressure with my full time job (which I love even more than RUclips)
Thanks for getting back to me, Chris. Haha, I totally understand. My video production work has me bogged down as well. I've always wanted to do a film-related RUclips channel, but work has kept me too busy. I'll throw out a request from time to time. But if you're not able to get to it, no sweat at all.
Chris, is there any difference in processing the test image between this lens and the L version? Comparing 6:43 of this video and 3:18 in the L version video there is an insane difference in contrast.
Great review! I will have to take a look at this lens in person, hopefully rent one to test it out. I have to decide between this and the L series version, especially whether I'm willing to pay more for weather sealing, more sharpness, and the overall build quality that comes with the L series.
Thanks Christopher for your review of the new 70-300, I have a t5i will the auto focus be as fast with that body? I use the camera for birding photo's. Looking forward to getting this lens before we go to Mexico in January.
@@PunjabiGymBeats it is very good. I’m using it for my 5D Mk III and M50. With the M50, it is effectively 480mm max. I can use it for bird photography.
@@titosirj6262 thanks a lot, i ll buy it soon, how much lens hood cost..? It should be included, i switched from Nikon and they provide lenshood with lens but with canon we have to buy seperately even my 18-135 usm is came without lenshood, strange.
The dog photo looks amazing. This is a good value lens, considering price performance. The 75-300, although much cheaper, can't compare to how good this one is.
Hello Chris, I am a bit confused among some telephoto lenses listed below. I buy lenses mainly for sharpness(I Q). I would actually like to know which of these 3 lenses will be the sharpest on my Canon 60D. 1) Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM 2 2) Canon EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS STM 3) Tamron 70-300mm F4/5.6 VC USD It would be great if you sort them in ascending order of their sharpness capabilities. In general all these lenses are in my budget but want to buy the sharpest for my canon 60D. I can even drop the extra 50 mm reach if second one is the sharpest. Thanks a lot for your wonderful and absolutely delightful videos.God bless.
I used to own a 55-250 STM on a 80D and now I own a 70-300mII on an EOS-R and I think it's a draw between these two. But the EOS-R is FF of course. So I expect the 70-300 to be a little less sharp than the 55-250 on an APS-C body. I have always thought the 55-250 STM to be unbeatable at that price, size and weight.
@@kanashiart Well, on both of these lenses (the 55-250 STM and the 70-300 mII) the AF is very accurate. But of course, the new nano-USM autofocus sytem in the 70-300 has an incredible speed, while the 55-250 STM is 'just quick'.
Which one would be better? This 70-300mm nano or the 55-250mm STM? I have a canon SL3(250D), Im looking for a good general use telephoto lens(video, wildlife etc) and i cant make my mind between the two :(
Like Chris said, very different lenses. The Tamron G2 series is pretty tight, major improvements over predecessors. Still don't perform as well as a first party lens for AF though, but in good light do just fine. The constant F2.8 aperture is a major plus over the Canon 70-300mm, since it will offer 2-4 times the light for exposure, allowing you to shoot at much faster shutter speeds at lower ISO settings. The 70-300mm, in good light, will give you 100mm more reach, and that is also a pretty major advantage. The Tamron is a lot more expensive, over twice the price. It depends on how you want to use either lens. I have both the 70-300mm and a 70-200mm F2.8 (Canon), as they are just for different situations. The F2.8 is also a good portrait lens. It jsut depends on what you want to do.
Had to watch the clip of the 6D being manually focused twice, before realizing the lens was being manually focused. So was that clip recorded with the 6D in Live View? Wondering how else you’d know how it was focusing.
I can't afford it...so I guess I will go for the Tamron 70-300 vc. I'm blown away with that focus speed and build quality seems better on the Canon too, but money is always a problem
I'm pretty sure the Tamron is about the same price as the Canon. You can get them for 450-500 on Amazon pretty regularly. Also, check out KEH, a used dealer online. I really don't suggest that Tamron. It's AF is shit and the CA is much worse than on the Canon. Even if the Canon is 50 dollars more it will be a much better investment. If you have a crop camera then I would say look into the EF-S 55-250mm IS STM instead. A cheaper lens at 300 USD, and performance is pretty high. I would say it is actually sharper than the 70-300mm. If you look on ebay you can get them for as little as 150 USD, new in box usually (though it is white box, not retail. Same lens though).
Hi! Can u please share ur thought which one would be better value for money, Canon 70-300 Usm ii vs Canon 70-200 f4 L (non is); the 2nd hand price of the later one is equal to the Canon 70-300.
The 70-200 f4 L has the reputation of being one of the sharpest lenses ever made by Canon. But hand-held, without the IS, I'm not so sure if that sharpness will always surface.
Thanks for this video, Chris. I wasn't even aware of this lens. I'm surprised you didn't compare it to the Tamron SP 70-300mm VC that you really liked.
Hello Chris, Just watched the review of 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM II .Liked it very much.Your reviews have always been so nice to me whenever I plan to purchase a new lens. Thanks a bunch for them. I actually wanted to know how does it performs when used with Canon 60D. Actually which lens will perform better in terms of Image Quality when used with Canon 60D. (apart from budget issues) A) 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM II B) 70-300 f/4-5.6 L
I'm convinced this is a rebranded Tamron SP 70-300 F4-5.6 Di VC USD slightly modified to Canon's requirements. The specs are nearly identical on the internals with only slight differences on the easily changed things like filter diameter. Canon users even report intermittent focusing issues with this lens, similar to the type you'd get from using a 3rd party lens. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with 3rd party lenses like Tamron and Sigma. Heck, I even gave a Tokina a try once. The latest generation Sigmas and Tamrons are knocking it out of the park in terms of performance and price point.
Jeffissimo H I haven’t heard of Canon working with Tamron on anything, but it’s possible. Tamron has made some lenses for Sony, Zeiss (the Batis 85mm, rumored anyway) and Pentax. No lens company is half as hit as Sigma right now in terms of their record breaking Art primes. Tamron has been doing very well with their zooms, like the 70-200mm G2 and the 28-75mm f/2.8 for Sony FE, and more...
I got the Canon M5 recently as well as getting the same off brand adapter to use my ef and ef-s lenses. Would love some suggestions/tests of some old lenses to use with the Canon mirrorless system.
I wouldn't even use that digital screen because I'm so used to measuring light to the eye and passing the data to the camera. That level of vibration is not something that one is aware of while taking pictures, if I look at it I have already missed 15 photos, everything is in the eye, the hand and the mind. However, it looks like an interesting lens to try more than anything for the optics, stabilization and AF.
how does the lens preform with a teleconverter 2x looking for a lens with some extra range in a acceptable price range? i got a canon 200d thanks love your videos
Hey Chris, I’m shooting a F1 race soon and I’m stuck between this and the 70-300 L lens, I have the money for it but is the image quality difference of the L worth giving up the extremely fast AF, which is really important in F1 and other motorsports ? ,,,I’m using a Canon 80d
Hello Christopher, thanks for the super clear review! Just one question: is it normal to hear and feel wobbly elements moving inside the lens body? If I slightly shake the lens while holding it I can really feel the internal parts moving... Have you found the same "internal loosness" as I did? I'm assuming it may be because of the stabilizer and floating bits, but maybe not... Thanks for all the past and future reviews! :-)
With some lenses it is normal - it could be part of the image stabilization mechanism. If it's working fine when it's on your camera, then you're good to go
zomgonzo I think Chris has an a7R II now, so it might be possible? I shoot a lot of adapted lenses and would really like that type of info as well. So many recent Canon lenses work great on a recent crop or FF Sony E-mount camera.
Another thorough and well presented review! Does anyone do it better than Christopher ? I cant say? Thank You for your efforts. I would like to know your opinion of this lens paired with a Canon 5D Mark IV? I’m a little late to this review, but have been binge watching a lot of RUclips whilst recovering from COVID. I have watched a lot of your videos, and am now a new Subscriber. Stay safe and Healthy! Happy Shooting! 👍👍👍✌🏻📷
I think the 55-250mm is a little bit sharper overall. Pretty comparable though. I think what it comes down to is intended use. The 70-300mm has 50mm extra reach (80mm on a crop) and also has nano-USM. The extra reach needs no explanation, it's just more reach, though it also isn't as wide so keep that in mind. The focus motor is much faster when it comes to tracking moving subjects, so if you are shooting a lot of outdoor sports the 70-300mm is possibly the best lens for under 1000 bucks. For video they are the same, as they both have quiet and smooth focus if used on a camera that supports that (T4i and up, though I wouldn't be using anything that lacks DPAF for video these days). So if that is worth the roughly 500 bucks this lens typically cost, then it is a decent choice for the money. Most the time though, if shooting a crop camera, I suggest the 55-250mm, since it is the best overall lens you can get for under 1000 bucks. I suggest them both over the 70-200mm F4L USM any more, since they are both less expensive and offer more advantages. The 70-200mm is still sharper than both, but the other lenses are also sharp and have other advantages like IS as well as a lower price point.
@@666Tomato666 For the most part I like to say that for wide angles 1mm at the wide end is worth 5mm at the long end (you can always crop in a little, you can't crop out, and you can't always step back). For the money, the 55-250mm is a more practical choice on any camera that you would use it on, since it is cheaper and you can do most the same things with it. I would play devil's advocate in that most the time if you are using a tele lens you are zooming in not out, so it just depends on the use. For sports coverage I prefer the 70-300mm since it focuses faster, and I rarely shoot zoomed out for that. For general shooting the 55-250mm is just more practical, and can also be used by most people for sports, since on a crop that lens has hella reach (the 50mm advantage the 70-300mm has won't make a big difference on a crop over the 55-250mm). STM is just a little slow for sports, so if nailing focus on every shot matters then the 70-300mm is a better choice, but not for the range, just for the focus (for most people this is not worth the added cost). I've shot sports with a 70-200mm F2.8 lens and didn't have trouble getting good shots with that reach. But in good light, a 55-250mm would probably get the job done for people that can't justify the cost of other lenses. It is the lens I always suggest to bundle with a new camera, since that takes 100 bucks of the cost, and I know how useful a lens it will be to just about everyone (and it kicks the crap out of the dreadful 75-300mm lens that often is thrown into bundles). I think everyone should have a telephoto, and that the 55-250mm IS STM is possibly the best value for under 1000 bucks in that class, provided you have a camera that can use it (it's crop only).
Hmm. Watching this review after your review of the 75-300 el-cheapo, it seems that this lens is optically inferior to that one on full frame. Have I got that correct?
Hi Chris, Canon 70-300mm f / 4-5.6 IS II USM or CANON EF 24-105mm f/4L USM which is good for canon 80D? and which will provide me sharp images? Please let me know,I am about to buy one.
@@peterdisbury6346me too I'm in the process of evaluating between these two lenses. What I got until now is that in terms of image quality they are comparable but not regarding the autofocus performance (the 70-300 USM is ii is way faster). This is especially important if shooting at sport events or naturalistic photography (birds, etc...). Am I wrong?
I wish they had put more DOF info on that LCD...that was a missed opportunity. Which full frame body are you going with, 6D2 or 5D4? Thanks for the video, I always enjoy them.
If you would get A7R II then on FF you would have to do only one test in terms of sharpness as APSC size on this camera have 18mpx (42.5mpx on full frame).
Hi Chris! I am really looking into this lens as a telephoto zoom! I am locked on getting a canon 70-300 and I can’t decide between this and the 70-300L. I barely have the money for the 70-300L but want to save. This seems like a very good performer. Is the 70-300L worth the extra $500 dollars and what would I get with the L that I won’t with this?
@Christopher Frost Photography do you think it is worth to switch from the EF-S 55-250 STM to this? I really love the 55-250 and consider it to be extraordinary value for the money, but sometimes I miss the extra range.
Chris, did you encounter any AF Hunting in lowlight at the Tele-end, 300mm ? i know it's f/5.6 @ 300mm, but still . . . upto f/8 should be fine for the centre AF point ! If yes, is this a shortcoming of Canon's newly developed Nano-USM Motor ? even STM Motors may have similar problem ! Regards.
Hi Chris, great review, you've made my mind up, my only question to you is what brand of converter for the closer shot of the robin in the video are you using. I own a Sony A6000 and I require a converter in order for this lens to fit/work but I have read reviews on Commlite which do have the required AF but the reviews are a little negative in terms of lens flare and it does mention about the focus not being that fast. Can you please advise on any other brands that might be more suitable or if it's worth the risk just buying this converter. Thanks.
Hey Chris, thanks for sharing your feedback on this lens. What is the video quality like compared to the EF-S 55-250? Does the amount of light vary drastically as you zoom in and out through the lens (as its predecessor)?
Great review as always! Just a quick question how does this compare to the Sigma 150-600mm, is it just better to crop from the canon at 300mm or is it sharper on the Sigma after 300mm?
Hi Chris. I have purchased this lens based upon your review. What I would like to know is if you got to test it on your 300v film slr? I have that camera also which I managed to get brand new just 3 months ago from a local photographic shop that was clearing out its stock prior to closing down.
Will you be doing a 70-300 lens comparison? I own a Tamron 70-300 VC and I'm a bit disappointed with it. It's not at all sharp and the VC keeps failing.
Hello Chris. Hope you are well. I'm looking for an inexpensive wildlife lens for my canon 7d , and was wondering in your opinion would this be sufficient, on a crop it's over 400mm . I normally do landscape and nature photos but want to broaden my horizons abit. I've chosen this lens because it in my price range. Thank you in advance. Joe.
hi Chris I'm retired and not touched a camera since 1985 an Olympus...9 months back I got a Panasonic Lumix FZ330 but already I want to move up some. I've decided on the Canon 80D not to sure about the lenses to have I think I might go for the 18-135 kit lens and the Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM II lens would that be a good choice? the lumix lens is 24-600...I go through your vids on lenses yours seem the best let me know if you can suggest anything else
A slightly better combination might be the Canon 15-85 combined with the 70-300 in this review - it'll give you a bit more zoom range on the wide angle ens
I got this lens yesterday, went out with it, and was very impressed by its great performance. I had a doubt about sharpness, but it is OK, also sharpness at 300mm is very, very good. And IS works excellent. I constantly got sharp images at 300mm with 1/80 and even with 1/40. That is the right lens for my shooting style. And it is a compact lens - that's important to me. Good option, if You don't need a faster aperture. Canon, respect!
Hi Janis
I am looking to buy canon 75-300 for my 90D. so i love pictures and video too. so what about video quality?
@@LilaGurung Sorry, I cannot tell about video, because I shoot only stills. But autofocus is fast and nice. And I have 70-300, not 75-300.
Do you find it sharper as the 55-250mm?
@@cosmindanes9435 +1
I'm a Nikon user, but I really enjoy your videos. Nice review.
Kikotronik I don't even have a camera, I still watch this
Sigh, still trying to find a nikon equivalent :(
If you're looking for a Nikon equivalent, the Tamron 70-300 VC USD seems very similar performance as this lens and is actually a bit less expensive. Chris did a review for it a while ago.
Milton Lee. gente.vgv v
Check out the new AF-P 70-300 VR. There is also a cheaper DX crop sensor version. It focuses lightning fast.
Your reviews are great. When ever I am on the fence about a lens I hope you've reviewed it.
I just bought this lens and I have been very happy with it. It's plenty sharp for me, the overall build is very nice although I find the LCD to be a huge gimmick lol
Autofocus is crazy fast! My 24-105 f4L seems like a slouch in comparison.
Thanks for inspiring me to try it out. I was just going to get the version 1 used and save some money but I'm glad I bought the newer one.
I loved that photo: 10:57
Hi Chris, I bought a copy of this lens this week and it's very good, I see some new perspective in super zoom conditions. Thanks for guiding me through buying it
This is really good for someone who's looking for a super telephoto lens with a APS-C camera for starting at wildlife photography within budget.
Christopher, even when you review gear that I would never consider buying,
I still love to watch your reviews. Thanks. :)
plz do a video of comparison between this lense and 55-250mm stm
This one is a Full-frame. If you have a mirrorless camera and use a speed booster with this one, you can turn this lens into a great expensive telephoto zoom lens at a fraction of the price of the more expensive one.
55-250 is sharper on aps-c. You can use it on R full frame cameras too but you'll loose few megapixel.
If they update all their lenses with the Nano USM motor, it will be a magical day.
Thank you so much for the review Chris !! I'm also very excited on your behalf for upgrading you FF camera soon ! :)
Hey Christopher, Thank you very much for this great review of the newest Canon 70-300mm NANO lens. I am very pleased with the so fastest focusing system and all but I really like the cool old brick building you use to show the sharpness of the lenses as the other test with the cluster of pictures looks to have less contrast. But, the lens looks very great and a super winner in my mind!!! I'd really love to see the canon 18-135mm NANO and the new Tamron 18-400mm lens. We know you'll get her done soon. Thank you again!!! You're the best!!!
Ok, I'm convinced! It's going on my wish list!
Hi Chris, how does this compare to the 55-250 is stm? Worth a change?
Love your videos by the way, keep up the great work mate!
They're very comparable in terms of sharpness :-)
Hey Christopher, I have got to say that from what I've seen, I think the Canon 55-250mm IS STM lens sharpness is actually quite a bit better than the new 70-300mm NANO. Man, that little 55-250mm Is STM is the sharpest Canon zoom lens I've ever seen tested. Too bad it's not a 55-300mm for the extra reach.
Thanks guys. That's the comaprison I wanted to know about too.
While I don't have this specific one, so comparing it to Tamron's 70-300, the additional range in the bottom of the range more than makes up for the missing 50mm at the top.
The difference between 250mm and 300mm is very little while 70 mm with APS-C is very zoomed in already.
@@christopherfrost I'm very confused. In your 55-250 STM review you say that it is "razor sharp" repeatedly and by f/8 "pin sharp". In this review on APSC, you say the lens is "okay in the middle", "a touch soft in the corners" and you need to stop down to f/11 for best quality at 300mm. Yet now you say they're comparable in terms of sharpness. The only reason I'm even looking at the 70-300 is that the focus breathing of the 55-250 means that for close up wildlife you just don't have the reach. I just can't justify stepping up to the L, but I'm not sure if I'll be going backwards. I shoot Nikon too, and I love the older AFS 70-300 VR and the new DX 70-300 VR lenses are even sharper (but not parfocal and also have issues focus breathing and reach close up)
Hi, nice review. Is still better the 55-250 is usm???
I don't have a canon, but I do like that lens display screen, especially the EQ focal lengths. Very good idea, indeed.
Brohan89 Why doesn’t it show the exact focal length though? That’s precisely what I’d want from a display right there. There’s no room to print that detail and it isn’t a linear transition either. Since the lens knows it’s focal length (shows up in EXIF data) what the fudge happened? That live level meter is beyond useless as is the DoF scale, since it isn’t high-res enough to really inform you of anything important. Honestly, i can’t believe it simply mirrors what is printed on the barrel. 🤪
Wow, about 20 years ago I picked up a used 75-300 4.5-5.6 IS USM and still have it. It's a slug and I can manual focus faster than the Auto focus but, it has served me well. It's still in use and fortunately software can correct the chromatic aberrations. For a first generation IS lens it was a game changer. Looks like the 75-300mm range has only gotten better.
How does the image quality and sharpness of this lens compare to the 55/250stm? Is it a worth while upgrade?
Matthew Augsburger I'm thinking the same as you, I like my 55-250.
It's the same I wanted to ask
To quote Chris "They're very comparable in terms of sharpness"
I used to own a 55-250 STM on a 80D and now I own a 70-300mII on an EOS-R and I think it's a draw between these two. But the EOS-R is FF of course. So I expect the 70-300 to be a little less sharp than the 55-250 on an APS-C body. I have always thought the 55-250 STM to be unbeatable at that price, size and weight. So I wouldn't even consider it an 'upgrade', except for the little bit of extra zoom.
Is the Canon 55 to 250 lens sharper than this 70 to 300. I have the 55 to 250 and it is very sharp so I don't want to trade it in for an additional 50 mm unless this new 70-300 is a lot sharper thanks for all your great videos. I use the
77 D camera
i got this lens after looking around a bit and finding your video having used it for a few years ive really enjoyed this lens i use it all the time, an incredible lens in my opinion especially for the price,
Thank you... Bought this lens to upgrade my Mark 1 because of your excellent review.
Between 70-300 L USM & 70-300 Nano USM , which one is better ?
Great review man! Thanks for putting the effort to make this video!
fantastic video! ive been looking for a zoom lens for my 77d for a while, the other day I was chatting with canon on their live chat and the reps over there really helped me narrow down my choice to this lens, which led me to your video! after that review it looks like im going to pick one up thanks!
Hi Christopher. After seeing your review (and a few others for Tamron, Sigma, etc.) I've bought the Canon EF 70-300 F4-5.6 IS II USM zoom lens, yesterday.
I am using it with a Canon EOS M6 and I am testing it today. It's working quite nice. I need to resolve the footing for the tripod, since the adapter is not fitted with the tripod screw.
Thank you, for posting, it was really helpful.
Good afternoon, Chris. I'm a director and cinematographer from the U.S. I like to put a great deal of effort into scoping out the lenses that best suit my needs for an affordable price, as utilizing various focal lengths to serve a story is one of my favorite aspects of cinematography. Your channel has helped me out a great deal in the few months that I've been following you, and its played a direct factor in my selection of several excellent lenses.
There's plenty out there that I'm curious to see reviews for. If you don't mind, I'd love to drop in from time to time with some requests for specific lenses. Your channel is by far the most well-formatted, well-organized, and generally charming and approachable review outlet I've ever found for lenses. I've come to trust your opinion considerably. Keep up the great work!
Thanks for the kind message - I'm glad you find the reviews helpful! I receive requests to test specific lenses all the time. Unfortunately I can't cover them all because I'm under huge time pressure with my full time job (which I love even more than RUclips)
Thanks for getting back to me, Chris. Haha, I totally understand. My video production work has me bogged down as well. I've always wanted to do a film-related RUclips channel, but work has kept me too busy. I'll throw out a request from time to time. But if you're not able to get to it, no sweat at all.
I used the 18-135mm usm nano on the Canon 80D it was awesome hope this is a good replacement for the 70-300 Efs
This guy has reviewed every lens ever made
Chris, is there any difference in processing the test image between this lens and the L version? Comparing 6:43 of this video and 3:18 in the L version video there is an insane difference in contrast.
Hi Chris, let me tell you, taht you are the best to review lenses, I always follo U, to take decision to buy a lens
best video analysis i have seen for this model. thank you
Great review! I will have to take a look at this lens in person, hopefully rent one to test it out. I have to decide between this and the L series version, especially whether I'm willing to pay more for weather sealing, more sharpness, and the overall build quality that comes with the L series.
opwave79 go for the L, it's fantastic!
WOW!!!! DAMN!!! Very little focus breathing as well! I'm amazed!
This lens got me with the LCD Screen :'D
Thanks Christopher for your review of the new 70-300, I have a t5i will the auto focus be as fast with that body? I use the camera for birding photo's. Looking forward to getting this lens before we go to Mexico in January.
Through the viewfinder it will be fantastically fast
I've enjoyed your videos a lot.. i'm from India and have subscribed to you today.. technical inputs are very grest.
Este era el video que necesitaba ver para estar seguro de la inversión ❤
Got this lens as a gift today
How it is..? You liked it..? I wanna buy it and use it with 90D.
@@PunjabiGymBeats it is very good. I’m using it for my 5D Mk III and M50. With the M50, it is effectively 480mm max. I can use it for bird photography.
@@titosirj6262 thanks a lot, i ll buy it soon, how much lens hood cost..? It should be included, i switched from Nikon and they provide lenshood with lens but with canon we have to buy seperately even my 18-135 usm is came without lenshood, strange.
@@PunjabiGymBeats I don’t have a hood. I don’t have a need for it yet,
The dog photo looks amazing. This is a good value lens, considering price performance. The 75-300, although much cheaper, can't compare to how good this one is.
Hello Chris,
I am a bit confused among some telephoto lenses listed below. I buy lenses mainly for sharpness(I Q).
I would actually like to know which of these 3 lenses will be the sharpest on my Canon 60D.
1) Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM 2
2) Canon EF-S 55-250mm F/4-5.6 IS STM
3) Tamron 70-300mm F4/5.6 VC USD
It would be great if you sort them in ascending order of their sharpness capabilities.
In general all these lenses are in my budget but want to buy the sharpest for my canon 60D.
I can even drop the extra 50 mm reach if second one is the sharpest.
Thanks a lot for your wonderful and absolutely delightful videos.God bless.
They'll all be good but I think it will be 2,1,3, in that order
Thanks for the reply Chris
how sharp it is as compared to 55-250 STM on APS-C body
I used to own a 55-250 STM on a 80D and now I own a 70-300mII on an EOS-R and I think it's a draw between these two. But the EOS-R is FF of course. So I expect the 70-300 to be a little less sharp than the 55-250 on an APS-C body. I have always thought the 55-250 STM to be unbeatable at that price, size and weight.
@@wieri347 and what about AF? Thinking about those two for a dog photography. Had 55-250 like 5 years ago and I have just good memories.
@@kanashiart Well, on both of these lenses (the 55-250 STM and the 70-300 mII) the AF is very accurate. But of course, the new nano-USM autofocus sytem in the 70-300 has an incredible speed, while the 55-250 STM is 'just quick'.
Ron v Wieringen thanks a lot, I had the non stm one before, so good to know that both are capable!
Which one would be better? This 70-300mm nano or the 55-250mm STM? I have a canon SL3(250D), Im looking for a good general use telephoto lens(video, wildlife etc) and i cant make my mind between the two :(
How does this lens compare to the new Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2 ?
Haven't tried that lens, yet. They are very different beasts
Like Chris said, very different lenses. The Tamron G2 series is pretty tight, major improvements over predecessors. Still don't perform as well as a first party lens for AF though, but in good light do just fine. The constant F2.8 aperture is a major plus over the Canon 70-300mm, since it will offer 2-4 times the light for exposure, allowing you to shoot at much faster shutter speeds at lower ISO settings. The 70-300mm, in good light, will give you 100mm more reach, and that is also a pretty major advantage. The Tamron is a lot more expensive, over twice the price. It depends on how you want to use either lens. I have both the 70-300mm and a 70-200mm F2.8 (Canon), as they are just for different situations. The F2.8 is also a good portrait lens. It jsut depends on what you want to do.
Love the photos of the Lake district Christopher 😀
Had to watch the clip of the 6D being manually focused twice, before realizing the lens was being manually focused.
So was that clip recorded with the 6D in Live View? Wondering how else you’d know how it was focusing.
I can't afford it...so I guess I will go for the Tamron 70-300 vc. I'm blown away with that focus speed and build quality seems better on the Canon too, but money is always a problem
I'm pretty sure the Tamron is about the same price as the Canon. You can get them for 450-500 on Amazon pretty regularly. Also, check out KEH, a used dealer online.
I really don't suggest that Tamron. It's AF is shit and the CA is much worse than on the Canon. Even if the Canon is 50 dollars more it will be a much better investment. If you have a crop camera then I would say look into the EF-S 55-250mm IS STM instead. A cheaper lens at 300 USD, and performance is pretty high. I would say it is actually sharper than the 70-300mm. If you look on ebay you can get them for as little as 150 USD, new in box usually (though it is white box, not retail. Same lens though).
nice video, will you recommend upgrade this lens to 70-300mm L lens?
If you have the money, then yes
@@christopherfrost thank you so much, i will
Hi!
Can u please share ur thought which one would be better value for money, Canon 70-300 Usm ii vs Canon 70-200 f4 L (non is); the 2nd hand price of the later one is equal to the Canon 70-300.
The 70-200 f4 L has the reputation of being one of the sharpest lenses ever made by Canon. But hand-held, without the IS, I'm not so sure if that sharpness will always surface.
Thanks for this video, Chris. I wasn't even aware of this lens. I'm surprised you didn't compare it to the Tamron SP 70-300mm VC that you really liked.
I never got to test the Tamron lens on full-frame unfortunately
Lens looks a lot like a Sigma Art/Contemporary series lens.
Hello Chris,
Just watched the review of 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM II .Liked it very much.Your reviews have always been so nice to me whenever I plan to purchase a new lens.
Thanks a bunch for them.
I actually wanted to know how does it performs when used with Canon 60D.
Actually which lens will perform better in terms of Image Quality when used with Canon 60D.
(apart from budget issues)
A) 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM II
B) 70-300 f/4-5.6 L
You won't see a huge amount of difference on an 18mp sensor, but the 'L' lens will be a bit sharper
I'm convinced this is a rebranded Tamron SP 70-300 F4-5.6 Di VC USD slightly modified to Canon's requirements. The specs are nearly identical on the internals with only slight differences on the easily changed things like filter diameter. Canon users even report intermittent focusing issues with this lens, similar to the type you'd get from using a 3rd party lens. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with 3rd party lenses like Tamron and Sigma. Heck, I even gave a Tokina a try once. The latest generation Sigmas and Tamrons are knocking it out of the park in terms of performance and price point.
Jeffissimo H I haven’t heard of Canon working with Tamron on anything, but it’s possible. Tamron has made some lenses for Sony, Zeiss (the Batis 85mm, rumored anyway) and Pentax. No lens company is half as hit as Sigma right now in terms of their record breaking Art primes. Tamron has been doing very well with their zooms, like the 70-200mm G2 and the 28-75mm f/2.8 for Sony FE, and more...
Hi Cris, in your opinion, for the canon 77 D, which is better, this lens or the sigma 100-400. Greatings for Portugal😷
Nice video! Do you happen to know if the IS compares to the 70-200mm lenses?
I got the Canon M5 recently as well as getting the same off brand adapter to use my ef and ef-s lenses. Would love some suggestions/tests of some old lenses to use with the Canon mirrorless system.
I’m still rocking it on my eos r8
I wouldn't even use that digital screen because I'm so used to measuring light to the eye and passing the data to the camera. That level of vibration is not something that one is aware of while taking pictures, if I look at it I have already missed 15 photos, everything is in the eye, the hand and the mind. However, it looks like an interesting lens to try more than anything for the optics, stabilization and AF.
I’ve got mine today Chris will use it on my canon mark 11
Great video
how does the lens preform with a teleconverter 2x looking for a lens with some extra range in a acceptable price range? i got a canon 200d thanks love your videos
I don't think it works with teleconvertors
teleconverters only work on L lenses
Hey Chris, I’m shooting a F1 race soon and I’m stuck between this and the 70-300 L lens, I have the money for it but is the image quality difference of the L worth giving up the extremely fast AF, which is really important in F1 and other motorsports ? ,,,I’m using a Canon 80d
Hello Christopher, thanks for the super clear review! Just one question: is it normal to hear and feel wobbly elements moving inside the lens body? If I slightly shake the lens while holding it I can really feel the internal parts moving... Have you found the same "internal loosness" as I did? I'm assuming it may be because of the stabilizer and floating bits, but maybe not... Thanks for all the past and future reviews! :-)
With some lenses it is normal - it could be part of the image stabilization mechanism. If it's working fine when it's on your camera, then you're good to go
Okay. Will buy this lens. As always, a great review, thank you.
Wonder how it works with a Sony through an adapter. Adding such information in the future would really be beneficial. Great review as always, cheers!
zomgonzo I think Chris has an a7R II now, so it might be possible? I shoot a lot of adapted lenses and would really like that type of info as well. So many recent Canon lenses work great on a recent crop or FF Sony E-mount camera.
Hey Chris, should I upgrade to this lens from my tamron 70-300 f4-5.6 a005? The nano usm seems really good
Thanks Chris for professional review.. how would image quality compare with Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM (canon M50)
This one's probably a little sharper. Take a look at my review of the 55-200
I wish this came in F4 all across. Would be awesome.
That'd be at the very least double the price.
But awesome!
diego diaz More like 3-4x the cost. The 70-300 L version, which is f/4-5.6, retails for 1349. make it constant f/4, and it might be closer to 2000.
Another thorough and well presented review! Does anyone do it better than Christopher ? I cant say? Thank You for your efforts. I would like to know your opinion of this lens paired with a Canon 5D Mark IV? I’m a little late to this review, but have been binge watching a lot of RUclips whilst recovering from COVID. I have watched a lot of your videos, and am now a new Subscriber. Stay safe and Healthy! Happy Shooting! 👍👍👍✌🏻📷
I want this for my future Canon 80D
Good choice :-)
Is it compatible for canon 80d ???
Hi Chris, is this lens sharper than Canon EF S 55-250mm STM lens?
About the same. Check out my review of that lens
Christopher Frost Photography Okay!
I think the 55-250mm is a little bit sharper overall. Pretty comparable though. I think what it comes down to is intended use. The 70-300mm has 50mm extra reach (80mm on a crop) and also has nano-USM. The extra reach needs no explanation, it's just more reach, though it also isn't as wide so keep that in mind. The focus motor is much faster when it comes to tracking moving subjects, so if you are shooting a lot of outdoor sports the 70-300mm is possibly the best lens for under 1000 bucks. For video they are the same, as they both have quiet and smooth focus if used on a camera that supports that (T4i and up, though I wouldn't be using anything that lacks DPAF for video these days). So if that is worth the roughly 500 bucks this lens typically cost, then it is a decent choice for the money. Most the time though, if shooting a crop camera, I suggest the 55-250mm, since it is the best overall lens you can get for under 1000 bucks. I suggest them both over the 70-200mm F4L USM any more, since they are both less expensive and offer more advantages. The 70-200mm is still sharper than both, but the other lenses are also sharp and have other advantages like IS as well as a lower price point.
@@kevindiaz3459 on APS-C the difference between 70 and 55 is big, when shooting I miss more the 55 at the bottom than the 300 at the far end
@@666Tomato666 For the most part I like to say that for wide angles 1mm at the wide end is worth 5mm at the long end (you can always crop in a little, you can't crop out, and you can't always step back). For the money, the 55-250mm is a more practical choice on any camera that you would use it on, since it is cheaper and you can do most the same things with it. I would play devil's advocate in that most the time if you are using a tele lens you are zooming in not out, so it just depends on the use. For sports coverage I prefer the 70-300mm since it focuses faster, and I rarely shoot zoomed out for that. For general shooting the 55-250mm is just more practical, and can also be used by most people for sports, since on a crop that lens has hella reach (the 50mm advantage the 70-300mm has won't make a big difference on a crop over the 55-250mm). STM is just a little slow for sports, so if nailing focus on every shot matters then the 70-300mm is a better choice, but not for the range, just for the focus (for most people this is not worth the added cost). I've shot sports with a 70-200mm F2.8 lens and didn't have trouble getting good shots with that reach. But in good light, a 55-250mm would probably get the job done for people that can't justify the cost of other lenses. It is the lens I always suggest to bundle with a new camera, since that takes 100 bucks of the cost, and I know how useful a lens it will be to just about everyone (and it kicks the crap out of the dreadful 75-300mm lens that often is thrown into bundles). I think everyone should have a telephoto, and that the 55-250mm IS STM is possibly the best value for under 1000 bucks in that class, provided you have a camera that can use it (it's crop only).
Hi Chris, would you recommend the 70-300 IS USM II or the Tamron 70-300 VS? To use on a 6d. Thanks!
Can I use this lens in canon 650d?
Thanks, for one more incredible review! These new electronics on the lens are awesome! Best regards from Brazil!
Hmm. Watching this review after your review of the 75-300 el-cheapo, it seems that this lens is optically inferior to that one on full frame. Have I got that correct?
Hi Chris, Canon 70-300mm f / 4-5.6 IS II USM or CANON EF 24-105mm f/4L USM which is good for canon 80D? and which will provide me sharp images? Please let me know,I am about to buy one.
Hey chris!
Which one do you prefer?
this lens or canon 55-250 mm STM?
I’m not Chris and this is 4 years later lol. I had the 55-250 and its total reach is much shallower than the 70-300/480. The USM Nano is superb…..
@peterdisbury6346 thanks for this feedback. I already own the EF-S 55-250. I'm considering this 70-300mm for use with my R6ii
@@peterdisbury6346me too I'm in the process of evaluating between these two lenses. What I got until now is that in terms of image quality they are comparable but not regarding the autofocus performance (the 70-300 USM is ii is way faster). This is especially important if shooting at sport events or naturalistic photography (birds, etc...). Am I wrong?
@Frank80BB
Yes fast autofocus is important for capturing birds in flight or doing some activity
@@Frank80BB
I plan to use this on my m50 mark ii
Does anyone knows if there is a x1.4 or x2.0 extender working on this lenses for Canon?
effeNovanta Yes and No
I wish they had put more DOF info on that LCD...that was a missed opportunity. Which full frame body are you going with, 6D2 or 5D4? Thanks for the video, I always enjoy them.
I want the 5D4 but I really can't afford it unfortunately
Which ones are you considering, Christopher?
Hi Chris. Can you tell me how this lens work on a Canon R7? Is almost has good, like in DSLR'S? Or has a fews limitations? Thank you.
What is like more convenient, this lens or the sigma 150-600 (C)?
If you would get A7R II then on FF you would have to do only one test in terms of sharpness as APSC size on this camera have 18mpx (42.5mpx on full frame).
Thanx again for the good and thorough review!
Hi Chris! I am really looking into this lens as a telephoto zoom! I am locked on getting a canon 70-300 and I can’t decide between this and the 70-300L. I barely have the money for the 70-300L but want to save. This seems like a very good performer. Is the 70-300L worth the extra $500 dollars and what would I get with the L that I won’t with this?
Personally I would just get this one over the 'L' lens. Personally
cause of weight? it would be interesting a video testintg both lenses
@Christopher Frost Photography do you think it is worth to switch from the EF-S 55-250 STM to this? I really love the 55-250 and consider it to be extraordinary value for the money, but sometimes I miss the extra range.
Could be worth it, if you really want the extra range, although do bear in mind that this 70-300 lens is a lot bigger and heavier
Chris, did you encounter any AF Hunting in lowlight at the Tele-end, 300mm ?
i know it's f/5.6 @ 300mm, but still . . . upto f/8 should be fine for the centre AF point !
If yes, is this a shortcoming of Canon's newly developed Nano-USM Motor ?
even STM Motors may have similar problem !
Regards.
My Canon 6D didn't seem to have a problem :-)
ok, will test again, Thanks.
Hi Chris, great review, you've made my mind up, my only question to you is what brand of converter for the closer shot of the robin in the video are you using. I own a Sony A6000 and I require a converter in order for this lens to fit/work but I have read reviews on Commlite which do have the required AF but the reviews are a little negative in terms of lens flare and it does mention about the focus not being that fast. Can you please advise on any other brands that might be more suitable or if it's worth the risk just buying this converter. Thanks.
I can't remember what convertor I used, and whether or not it worked well. The Sigma MC-11 tends to work quite well but I can't guarantee it
Can I use this lens for photography at birthday events? Few says it has a real focusing issue. Not sure why….
Hey Chris, thanks for sharing your feedback on this lens. What is the video quality like compared to the EF-S 55-250? Does the amount of light vary drastically as you zoom in and out through the lens (as its predecessor)?
It's a little brighter, but really there's not that much difference
In APSC it's 112-480mm f/6.4-8.9, is that right?
That is, is it darker by the conversion factor?
The display is plain cool
Basically F8 is a good for the potential of the lens. I just ordered one for my R8. Wish me luck
Is it good for taking pictures of the moon ? Or would you recommend any other lens in the same price range ?
Which one to go, this one or Tamron 70-300 F4-5.6 VC USD?
The only thing I'm not sure about is the LCD focus scale display rather than a mechanical one.
Great review as always! Just a quick question how does this compare to the Sigma 150-600mm, is it just better to crop from the canon at 300mm or is it sharper on the Sigma after 300mm?
You'll have to crop a LOT to get a 600mm image from this 70-300!! They're very different lenses
if possible, can you re-review this lens using the Canon R7? 😊😊😊
This, but now :D
Hi Chris. I have purchased this lens based upon your review. What I would like to know is if you got to test it on your 300v film slr? I have that camera also which I managed to get brand new just 3 months ago from a local photographic shop that was clearing out its stock prior to closing down.
No, I didn't test it on film
Will you be doing a 70-300 lens comparison? I own a Tamron 70-300 VC and I'm a bit disappointed with it. It's not at all sharp and the VC keeps failing.
Hello Chris. Hope you are well.
I'm looking for an inexpensive wildlife lens for my canon 7d , and was wondering in your opinion would this be sufficient, on a crop it's over 400mm .
I normally do landscape and nature photos but want to broaden my horizons abit.
I've chosen this lens because it in my price range.
Thank you in advance.
Joe.
On crop it's good enough for wildlife photography IMO
hi Chris
I'm retired and not touched a camera since 1985 an Olympus...9 months back I got a Panasonic Lumix FZ330 but already I want to move up some. I've decided on the Canon 80D not to sure about the lenses to have I think I might go for the 18-135 kit lens and the Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS ['Nano'] USM II lens would that be a good choice? the lumix lens is 24-600...I go through your vids on lenses yours seem the best let me know if you can suggest anything else
A slightly better combination might be the Canon 15-85 combined with the 70-300 in this review - it'll give you a bit more zoom range on the wide angle ens
awesome review as usual 👍
Is there an option to run DOOM on the little screen? ;)