I had a very bad experience with the 75-300 and never looked back. I was asked to shoot Candids at a Litte Leaugue baseball game for my job. My colleagues were stuck with the Canon 400mm f2.8 which is a beast of a lens. I thought I had the edge since I could move around and get shots from various angles. At the end of the day we compared pictures. It was like night and day ! The pictures from the 75-300 were absolutely horrible. OK so some pictures came out pretty good, but I think this is the first time that 90% of my shots came out bad. I will never forget that day. However, I'm glad I watched this video because I use to confuse the 75-300 with the 70-300. I didn't know there was so much of a difference.
7:04 - that blur happened because you were shooting through the fence, not because of the lens. It happens like that when you shoot through things sometimes. :)
I own the 70-300mm, I use it mainly for wildlife and that weird bokeh is a thing. It's not because of the fence, if there's branches or wires in the background, it will do that. That said, I'm pretty happy with the lens, this olnly happens in very specific conditions, the lens is very nice for wildlife. sharp, fast auto-focus and light and compact to carry around.
@@DaronP.959 Yes it is because of the fence idk why I said it wasn't. If there are branches or wires in the image completely out of focus (either foreground or background) it sometimes does that. It was rarely a problem for me though, but it happens.
With my experience with the 75-300MM, I found it hands down better to focus in Manual mode. Tripod also helps to stabilize the camera.... Oh...and a lens hood improves the images, especially when using the video mode.
The weird bokeh is brobably becouse there was a fence between you and the subject. On a diferent note for me the biggest problem with the 75-300 is its purple fringing which is horrible on contrasting edges (you can get around it on ff but on aps-c its unuseable)
Thank you very much! This is the most helpful review of these lenses on RUclips! I have been looking for a report on how these lenses do not shoot flower-leaves, but ACTION for a long time. Because it is for action that attention is paid to these lenses. Thank you!
I don't know if you've figured it out yourself yet. but use this 70-300 times on an APS-C camera. this lens is intelligent and recognizes whether it is on a full frame or aps-c camera. the moment it's on an aps-c camera, you'll learn to love the mini display because it THEN shows the focal length equivalent to the fullframe camera (including crop calculation). On a full frame camera this makes little sense, since the focal length is printed DIRECTLY next to the display.
I just picked a second hand one of these on eBay as part of a package deal. 300mm on a crop sensor of 1.6 gives you a fullframe equivalent of 480mm. No image stab but just up the shutter speed and iso and if needed clean up the noise in post processing with Topaz or LRC.
Thanks for the review -- As it happens, I enjoy the awesome 55-250mm STM on an APS-C camera, and I've been looking for an affordable full-frame equivalent. Can't say anything yet about Canon's 70-300mms, but their '75-300mm' is, at best, a 75-150mm. Beyond that point, images degrade to dreadful levels (laughable focus, insane chromatic aberration). Also, the lens is so poorly built that it doesn't always produce a flat image plane (one side of the frame or the other is often out of focus due to interior optical mechanism slop). I did manage a number of hit-and-miss photos that are decently sharp and produced several very nice video clips -- and until I decide where to go, at least I have a hit-and-miss 75-150mm in my bag in case of an emergency.
Great video!! Seems the 70-300mm is the better choice when you need to take pictures and you know you won't have extra time to make sure you get the shot right, in other words, you need to get it right on the first 2-3 tries at most. So, semi-professional work. By the way, those drive by shots of the go karts were AWESOME!!
7:19 this happens to me a lot when I take photos on the 75-300m. I this it happens if something is in the way on the zoom can’t process the image but I’m not sure
PER FECT review with real life usage... thumbs up, shopping for one of these, still watching the video while typing this so don't know the 'ending' yet :D
I'm using the 70-300 in my R8 and absolutely love the lens. Extremely fast focus and sharp at 300. Need longer reach for birding and getting an RF800 but have had this lens for years. I tried selling it though on FB before I got the R8 and one guy offered me 200 with shipping. No thanks. No other takers.
The sharpness differences between these 2 lenses maybe it's because the apperture used in that moment is different. The apperture sometimes change the sharpness ;)
The blurring is also do to your shutter speed and apature id suggest 1/500 and bring the apature up the blur us because your using it 300mm a higher focal length creates more blur then say a 70mm i also use apature priority or manual ne suto focus on any lens messes up
I have always been a fan of Adobe Lightroom, but I haven't renewed my subscription in a while, as photography hasn't been a significant part of my life lately (and I'm no longer a student so I can't take advantage of the delicious student discount). So I've been searching myself. I know GIMP is free and pretty popular but I haven't delved into it yet.
Hi, Thanks for taking the time to answer me really appreciate that, Thanks for the advice I'll have a look at the ones your mentioned, Cheers and have a good new year, Mark
Hi im currenty using the 75 to 300mm and recently was shooting Cheetahs in Fota wild life park and I got that exact boka in the back ground that you got the wavey lines, and I thought it was the fence I was shooting through, but thanks to you I now know it was the lens at 300mm ❤❤
I need a lens for my Canon 70d which I bought on Monday and I need to take pictures of animals and I have looked between the two, your video has made me smarter about which one to choose
I'm glad it helped! I might recommend shying away from these choices, as they're designed for Canon's full frame systems, but maybe check out the EF-S lenses. Maybe the 55-250. But if you're planning on one day upgrading to a full frame Canon, the options in the video might be a better choice long term!
@@nickslens - why would you recommend they shy away from a EF full frame lens? Seems to be a bit short sighted to me. If one ever plans on buying good quality glass they are never going to find it in the EF-S lineup. Save yourself some money in the long-run and buy good quality glass.
Thanks for the Video! I have the 75-300mm and always been doubting if I should have got the one with Image Stabilization. I've been getting some Great Shots with the cheaper lens and been rather impressed, I'm no professional, I just point and shoot ha ha. but your video puts mind at ease. A BIG than you ! :)
Nice comment! Do you mind sharing what cheaper lens you have used that have given you great shots!? This will be my very first time buying lens, so it'll be great to not invest too much and see what I like
@Jojo Cluddy Hey there, The Lens I have is the "Cannon Zoom Lens EF 75-300mm" it's a great Lens, & done me well! I picked it up on Amazon for £230, the more expensive Lens is the : "Canon EF 70 - 300 mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM
@@filmitvideography5022 - for an additional 5 pounds you could of bought a Tamron SP 70-300mm lens that would of blown both the 75-300 and the 70-300mm Canon lenses out of the water.
Funny how I can’t get rid of the 75-300. Once you have it, once you learn how to compensate it’s limitations, it’s very hard to invest money on another focus lens, unless you wanna aim at an L series. For me it came as a kit lens so the deal was great. I rather spent money on a classic 70-200 F4 or add a camera body (a mirrorless for example)
I bought a 70-200mm f/2.8 from Sigma, very old. But I am shocked with the sharpness of this lens. Try to find Sigma or Tamron 70-200mm and give a review.
you have a mistake on the title 😵💫😵 that’s confusing. btw 7:04 is normal and that’s because you are too close while shooting behind the black net, or the sage. i don’t know what they call it😬 but it is not issue
Yeahhh that'll be a perpetual problem since it's a full frame lens. It'll definitely work, but it's always more ideal to stick with lenses designed for the appropriate sensor size. But I've dealt with it for sure!
Well these lenses are good for anyone who needs this kind of focal range. Usually wildlife or sports, for basically anything you want if you're willing to get creative. Canon and other brands obviously make great options that are much more expensive, and of course those would be ideal. But if you're on a budget, both of these lenses are great choices.
The 75-300 is dog poop. Good only if you're on a very tight budget and need the reach to take some kids photos you will print tiny or don't mind the image degradation. You will also miss allot of shots with that autofocus. If you're serious about getting good pictures, between these two get the 70-300 USM.
Hey the fence definitely may be a contributing factor. That may be it. But anything is professional if you use it for a professional purpose. Could for sure make either work in a pro setting.
@@nickslens - you could make a pig fly too if you gave it wings. There are good reasons you don't see professional photographers using lenses like the EF 75-300. While you may be lucky and get some nice shots using it, the quality and the overall build of the lens isn't there.
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I had a very bad experience with the 75-300 and never looked back. I was asked to shoot Candids at a Litte Leaugue baseball game for my job. My colleagues were stuck with the Canon 400mm f2.8 which is a beast of a lens. I thought I had the edge since I could move around and get shots from various angles. At the end of the day we compared pictures. It was like night and day ! The pictures from the 75-300 were absolutely horrible. OK so some pictures came out pretty good, but I think this is the first time that 90% of my shots came out bad. I will never forget that day. However, I'm glad I watched this video because I use to confuse the 75-300 with the 70-300. I didn't know there was so much of a difference.
7:04 - that blur happened because you were shooting through the fence, not because of the lens. It happens like that when you shoot through things sometimes. :)
Hey thanks for the info! If that's it, then it's not too bad of an issue! Very niche use case!
Came here to say this
I own the 70-300mm, I use it mainly for wildlife and that weird bokeh is a thing.
It's not because of the fence, if there's branches or wires in the background, it will do that.
That said, I'm pretty happy with the lens, this olnly happens in very specific conditions, the lens is very nice for wildlife. sharp, fast auto-focus and light and compact to carry around.
@@brunoalves-pg9eo so it did happen because of the fence but there is also other things that can cause it
@@DaronP.959 Yes it is because of the fence idk why I said it wasn't. If there are branches or wires in the image completely out of focus (either foreground or background) it sometimes does that.
It was rarely a problem for me though, but it happens.
With my experience with the 75-300MM, I found it hands down better to focus in Manual mode. Tripod also helps to stabilize the camera.... Oh...and a lens hood improves the images, especially when using the video mode.
The weird bokeh is brobably becouse there was a fence between you and the subject. On a diferent note for me the biggest problem with the 75-300 is its purple fringing which is horrible on contrasting edges (you can get around it on ff but on aps-c its unuseable)
Thank you very much! This is the most helpful review of these lenses on RUclips! I have been looking for a report on how these lenses do not shoot flower-leaves, but ACTION for a long time. Because it is for action that attention is paid to these lenses. Thank you!
I don't know if you've figured it out yourself yet. but use this 70-300 times on an APS-C camera. this lens is intelligent and recognizes whether it is on a full frame or aps-c camera. the moment it's on an aps-c camera, you'll learn to love the mini display because it THEN shows the focal length equivalent to the fullframe camera (including crop calculation). On a full frame camera this makes little sense, since the focal length is printed DIRECTLY next to the display.
you are great 👍 brother i enjoy your calmness to tell the story after a long time i watch a complete video without skipping
I just picked a second hand one of these on eBay as part of a package deal. 300mm on a crop sensor of 1.6 gives you a fullframe equivalent of 480mm. No image stab but just up the shutter speed and iso and if needed clean up the noise in post processing with Topaz or LRC.
Thanks for the review -- As it happens, I enjoy the awesome 55-250mm STM on an APS-C camera, and I've been looking for an affordable full-frame equivalent. Can't say anything yet about Canon's 70-300mms, but their '75-300mm' is, at best, a 75-150mm. Beyond that point, images degrade to dreadful levels (laughable focus, insane chromatic aberration). Also, the lens is so poorly built that it doesn't always produce a flat image plane (one side of the frame or the other is often out of focus due to interior optical mechanism slop). I did manage a number of hit-and-miss photos that are decently sharp and produced several very nice video clips -- and until I decide where to go, at least I have a hit-and-miss 75-150mm in my bag in case of an emergency.
Thanks for this video and breaking down the specs .
Nicely told . Very informative . I bought 75 300 recently in budget price.
Much needed video here, I’ve been researching a telephoto zoom substitute for those rf 70-200’s 😂! I think I’ll grab the 70 here! 👍🏼
Did you buy it ? How is it ? Pls tell me..❤❤
@@a_commonman I didn’t get it, I switched to Fuji
Best video while comparing both the lenses. I liked the content
Thanks! I appreciate that!
Great video, thanks for shearing just bought 70-300 🙂
Great video!! Seems the 70-300mm is the better choice when you need to take pictures and you know you won't have extra time to make sure you get the shot right, in other words, you need to get it right on the first 2-3 tries at most. So, semi-professional work.
By the way, those drive by shots of the go karts were AWESOME!!
Another awesome and helpful video could be on Moon photos with both this lenses !!
7:19 this happens to me a lot when I take photos on the 75-300m. I this it happens if something is in the way on the zoom can’t process the image but I’m not sure
Thanks for sharing! 70-300 looks great !
PER FECT review with real life usage... thumbs up, shopping for one of these, still watching the video while typing this so don't know the 'ending' yet :D
@@enfieldlover8145 this means a lot! Glad you enjoyed it! I really like the way this video turned out. Glad you got some value from it.
I'm using the 70-300 in my R8 and absolutely love the lens. Extremely fast focus and sharp at 300. Need longer reach for birding and getting an RF800 but have had this lens for years. I tried selling it though on FB before I got the R8 and one guy offered me 200 with shipping. No thanks. No other takers.
Coming from analog photography, why exactly is recommended a Stabilisator? 🤔
Good to see you back! :)
Did you tested this combi also? CANON EF-S 55-250MM F/4-5.6 IS STM or canon ef 70-300mm f/4-5.6 is ii usm
Nice vid! Tomorrow I'll buy mi first telephoto lens, the 75-300 for only 90$ :) I hope I can learn with it and then upgrade to a better one
Thanks! It should serve you well!
The sharpness differences between these 2 lenses maybe it's because the apperture used in that moment is different. The apperture sometimes change the sharpness ;)
The blurring is also do to your shutter speed and apature id suggest 1/500 and bring the apature up the blur us because your using it 300mm a higher focal length creates more blur then say a 70mm i also use apature priority or manual ne suto focus on any lens messes up
Hi, Loved your comparison of the lenses, just wondering what photo software are you using on you pc as I'm looking for one myself?
I have always been a fan of Adobe Lightroom, but I haven't renewed my subscription in a while, as photography hasn't been a significant part of my life lately (and I'm no longer a student so I can't take advantage of the delicious student discount). So I've been searching myself. I know GIMP is free and pretty popular but I haven't delved into it yet.
Hi, Thanks for taking the time to answer me really appreciate that, Thanks for the advice I'll have a look at the ones your mentioned, Cheers and have a good new year, Mark
you are very good rewiever...!!u cleared all my doubt bruh...love u..!!
Thanks! I appreciate it! Maybe eventually I'll make more!
Hi im currenty using the 75 to 300mm and recently was shooting Cheetahs in Fota wild life park and I got that exact boka in the back ground that you got the wavey lines, and I thought it was the fence I was shooting through, but thanks to you I now know it was the lens at 300mm ❤❤
I need a lens for my Canon 70d which I bought on Monday and I need to take pictures of animals and I have looked between the two, your video has made me smarter about which one to choose
I'm glad it helped! I might recommend shying away from these choices, as they're designed for Canon's full frame systems, but maybe check out the EF-S lenses. Maybe the 55-250. But if you're planning on one day upgrading to a full frame Canon, the options in the video might be a better choice long term!
@@nickslens - why would you recommend they shy away from a EF full frame lens? Seems to be a bit short sighted to me. If one ever plans on buying good quality glass they are never going to find it in the EF-S lineup. Save yourself some money in the long-run and buy good quality glass.
Thanks for the Video! I have the 75-300mm and always been doubting if I should have got the one with Image Stabilization.
I've been getting some Great Shots with the cheaper lens and been rather impressed, I'm no professional, I just point and shoot ha ha. but your video puts mind at ease. A BIG than you ! :)
Nice comment! Do you mind sharing what cheaper lens you have used that have given you great shots!? This will be my very first time buying lens, so it'll be great to not invest too much and see what I like
@Jojo Cluddy Hey there, The Lens I have is the "Cannon Zoom Lens EF 75-300mm" it's a great Lens, & done me well! I picked it up on Amazon for £230, the more expensive Lens is the : "Canon EF 70 - 300 mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM
@@filmitvideography5022 - for an additional 5 pounds you could of bought a Tamron SP 70-300mm lens that would of blown both the 75-300 and the 70-300mm Canon lenses out of the water.
Hey! Your review really helpful
I have a 75-300 and a tripod. Moon pictures come out pretty good.
Funny how I can’t get rid of the 75-300. Once you have it, once you learn how to compensate it’s limitations, it’s very hard to invest money on another focus lens, unless you wanna aim at an L series. For me it came as a kit lens so the deal was great.
I rather spent money on a classic 70-200 F4 or add a camera body (a mirrorless for example)
I bought a 70-200mm f/2.8 from Sigma, very old. But I am shocked with the sharpness of this lens. Try to find Sigma or Tamron 70-200mm and give a review.
Hi...Are both USM lenses.. or STM sir
Great review! Thanks!
Nice review. I liked and subbed.
Thanks!!
Thank you for this video ❤️
Thanks for this information. Would the 75-300 with a tripod, be good to get shots of birds that are far away? Like 500ft?
I'm not sure about distance, but I'm sure you could make it work. Just ensure you have the right angle and adequate lighting and it can look good!
@@nickslens thanks for your quick reply
no. 300mm cant capture birds at 500ft distance..
7:08 так что с кадром, не разобрались? От чего это может быть, или это дефект объектива?
it's work fine with r mounth and adamptor in therms of focus?
in how many f stops does 70mm- 3oo comes?
I've got some good photos with the 75-300 but I've also gotten better cleaner images with the 55-250 and blowing up in photoshop :/
The 55-250 is awesome.
Thank u for the video . lifesaver
I've had a terrible experience with the 75-300. Worst Canon lens ever!
what camera did you use for this video?
Canon EOS RP.
you have a mistake on the title 😵💫😵 that’s confusing. btw 7:04 is normal and that’s because you are too close while shooting behind the black net, or the sage. i don’t know what they call it😬 but it is not issue
Hey thanks for the catch! I can't believe the title has been wrong this whole time and I didn't notice. Fixed.
Focal length shows up different on APSC😂😂😂 damn it
Yeahhh that'll be a perpetual problem since it's a full frame lens. It'll definitely work, but it's always more ideal to stick with lenses designed for the appropriate sensor size. But I've dealt with it for sure!
55-250 IS STM is even better and cheap. 🙂
Yeah it looks pretty good to me! But that's an EF-S lens and I've wanted to stick to EF.
the AF of the 55-250 IS STM is not as fast as the 70-300 IS USM II
@@cubo7420Still pretty quick. I shoot portraits and this lens is awesome outdoors and very much so in studio.
What’s the camera you’re using?
It’s the Canon EOS RP.
Is it good for one for all any type of photos tks
Well these lenses are good for anyone who needs this kind of focal range. Usually wildlife or sports, for basically anything you want if you're willing to get creative. Canon and other brands obviously make great options that are much more expensive, and of course those would be ideal. But if you're on a budget, both of these lenses are great choices.
What camera do you use? Thanks for the video
EOS RP
Thanks.
This lens ruined my shots today and I still like it. It's called Stockholm Syndrome😂
What camera was this taken on ??
EOS RP
Ok thank u perfect
Can I get a cannon r8 and one of those
Yeah EF to R lens mount adapters! I used one for this video. None of these are R lenses.
75-300 is for beginners, low budget zoom lens. It may be good for astronomy with low cost.
It’s what I’m going to use it for
So 70-300 better than 75-300 ???
It's ultimately subjective but as I talk about in the video, the 70-300 is generally better, yeah.
The 75-300 is dog poop. Good only if you're on a very tight budget and need the reach to take some kids photos you will print tiny or don't mind the image degradation. You will also miss allot of shots with that autofocus. If you're serious about getting good pictures, between these two get the 70-300 USM.
😂😂😂 you said dog pood? I had one and had to throw it away to the garbage bins
Your problem at 300mm is because of the fence.
Also both of these lenses are nice but not professional.
Hey the fence definitely may be a contributing factor. That may be it. But anything is professional if you use it for a professional purpose. Could for sure make either work in a pro setting.
@@nickslens - you could make a pig fly too if you gave it wings. There are good reasons you don't see professional photographers using lenses like the EF 75-300. While you may be lucky and get some nice shots using it, the quality and the overall build of the lens isn't there.
muito bom
Don't buy 75-300, rather go for 55-250
Apsc only
the extra 100 or so is so worth it
@@WilliamNickerson-m7r The 55-250 is still a much better lens overall than the 75-300. I really want to try the 70-300, though.
@@WilliamNickerson-m7r worth it, 75-300's stabilizer is the worst.
The only racing category that is faster and has higher g-force on curves than kart is F1 - Ayrton Senna.
Let your cat help 😊
Its nice but NOT worth the price
I like
Cheese
Super, duper, mega clueless.