I agree. He had a good point he was trying to get too but sadly he wasn’t able to express himself adequately which is disappointing because 1) he’s a young congressman and 2) he’s a KENNEDY!! 🤦🏻♀️ *smh* Just overall with these headings it seems to me that no one really prepared for what they were going to ask. Like properly prepare - with so many Gen Yers, millennials and even some Gen X-ers available to tap as resources to research, better understand and provide insight on the practical use of the platform it seems to me the US Congress & Senate woefully failed in their duties to get the issue right and get Facebook to really implement change. In most instances you could see Mark Zuckerberg trying not to LOL at the ridiculous questions they were asking. It’s a shame.
very good detailed questioning - he covered all the bases and didn't allow him any wiggle room but still allowed him to answer every question. Good going Joe!
@@nurulqwe If you think only facebook collects, organize and use data on what you do on their platform, then yes, this is an internet's "issue" but honestly, is more about an user issue since most people that use internet don't really understand how it works and what it does in the background.
@@stormcry0 its only facebook issue. Internet has many ways of avoiding data leakage. This in not only facebook issue but also every platform on the internet especially google. Internet is so unregulated that these platforms can do whatever they want with the data you willingly/unwillingly gave them, but all these platforms can be regulated if the leaders are knowledgeable enough to do it. Not the internet but the platforms that abuse the internet.
they are not LISTENING... they come with a bunch of questions, do NOT listen to the answer, then jump to the next question they have written by who knows who.
FB needs to do a lot on privacy and has many other issues, but these guys are asking the questions are just lacking knowledge of the whole thing -and manners !!
The best one is the one in which Marc says no to a big company only happening in America and the senator says "you were supposed to answer yes" and is knoked out.
Yocto very true...bless Mr MZ After all this time...and there ia You tube even worse than FB , did not get sue .AIN'T FAIR !!!!!!!! FB HAS HELP ALOT OF PEOPLE TO!!! There are just some jealous people out there that want's to get rich with an evil way.... FB ask for agreements and WE SIGN FOR IT... So let it be..... If it was not for FB , me and family would have not met ever.... and me and my friends back in UK and here i am...across on the other earth, and FB brought me together with them all. Just give them a chance to fixt things up, but don't shut FB .... what about us that only needs family and friends !? 😢
These congressman or women need to study about internet and computer before the ask any question..they just wasting time and money by asking dumb question.
oh so you have enough at this point? but net neutrality you could care less? same people making our laws for the internet are the same lobbyist in the companies giving away our data. stop being delusional and picking parts.
He knows what he’s saying, he’s asking if private or deleted data can used for advertisers to show them a recommendation for a product or anything else from what I have seen in the comments and watched.
I think sooner or later this was going to happen due to the massive growth the internet is having. Sooner or later it was going to become an issue. People also need to understand that not everybody knows how a server works, how data is stored on the internet, how is shared, or what metadata is for that matter so it’s great that they are finally talking about it so people can get educated on it.
Mark is like a rock.. no empaty ever.. no emotions.. no humanity.. just work, programming and business. anhuman of course regardless of the situation...
funny because he also sells your data from star trek. Or non-star trek. He just sells your data I don't know where I was going with this. He looks like a worm tho.
"Congressman, no" "Senator, sure" "Senator" "Congressman" "Senator, yes" "Congressman, yes" Why do I get the feeling that this was a robotic replica of Mark Zuckerberg, being controlled back at Facebook headquarters by Sheryl Sandberg and Larry Summers?
- Can advertisers have access to people's data? - No, because of this this and that. - Okay, I understand, but can advertisers have access to people's data? - No. *gives an example* - I see... Can advertisers have access to people's data? - No. - Interesting, Can advertisers have access to people's data? So on and so on.
Yeah at least this guy was asking the right questions. He's not an expert in the subject but at least he's trying to pull on the key points and clarify areas
So basicaly advertisers sell some ads to FB and then FB shows those ads to users that might be interested in them, but the data never leaves the FB servers and is never directly submitted to the advertisers?
This is the most beautiful thing for marketing. Every business owner dream for marketing and for people who need that last push to make that purchase. Genius!
if you put your data public, then it is public even for advertisers. I think they haven’t thought long and hard enough with their questions and wasted so much time. i think facebook can find a way to educate facebook users constantly about the things they put in public because these users sometimes forget they put their information in public and gets very upset when suddenly they see ads relevant to their searches. Ads most of the time is annoying for social media users. I guess there should be an option on user’s profile to turn on or turn off ads
+Book Videos: An option to turn on and off ads is the dumbest idea ever. First off, if the option was there to turn off ads, NOBODY would have ads on. That's just how it is. Second, how will Facebook make their money? They won't be able to sustain themselves as a business and they will shutdown. The only way you can make Facebook run without ads is if you make it a paid service, and I guarantee you that everyone would take ads that are targeted to you based on things you "like" on your public Facebook page over a monthly bill.
Has anyone thought about how this can be addressed tho? Stupid or not what yall people do is just complain and ridicule but thanks for the attention and time.
this is actually already a thing on instagram. Photographs of shoes or bags get automatically match to a reseller for that exact item. I understand people are a bit scared about seeing something out of the ordinary the same way we are a bit scared when we first discovered smart phone. but this can actually be useful. What mark zuckerberg is trying to say to these senators when he answers “let me get back to you” IS “ Let me know when you catch UP!”
If anybody breaks into your house, goes through you personal details of Family n friends,FB sneakily does this online ! would you now approach the court or police?
This dude is asking questions like a math test word problem. “If you have this information, provided by the people on Facebook, to use in ads that will target certain interest, using demographic data, where it come from?” That’s not a question he actually said but most of them are run on sentences that I would’ve gotten a 66 for on an essay for English class
This is sad. They didn't do their homework.. I've run an ad on Facebook. I can't see anyone's info. I simply key words like "dog lovers ages 19-37", or "pet toys" & because I'm selling pet clothes & toys Facebook controls & only shows my ad to people who are interested in those type of things anyway. I have no idea who the people are that's seeing my Ad besides country location & gender. I thing the government just wants to gain control over all of that user data.
Terrence Burwell It would also be stupid for Facebook to share the data with you. That data is an asset for them and sharing it would depreciate its value.
That's exactly right. That's what I'm trying to tell people. The government is targeting mark as an opportunity to continue covering up how involved they already are in our private lives.
Just in case anyone is wondering.. as someone who has advertised on Facebook I can confirm we have no idea what individuals we are specifically teaching until they click an ad and make a purchase. We only know that because obviously their name and information comes into our e-commerce website platform so we can fill their order. When building an ad, you choose which location, age range, interests, and behaviors you want to target. Typically millions of people are reached over time. We don’t know who we are targeting until they buy from us. Not sure why people are so weird about interest targeted ads.
I’m confused on why people would be mad/scared about that tho? Like “HEY GUYS I LIKE SKIING !” *gets ads for ski gear* “WAIT A MINUTE WHY DO THEY KNOW I LIKE SKIS THEY SHOULDNT KNOW THAT!!” ????
at 3:40 Joe Kennedy nails it. Congress needs to write a law that strongly puts Users Data firmly in control of that user, thus strengthens and supporting the act of right to privacy for that user. Third parties must explicitly on an individual basis court the user for the data, and not attempt a consequential approach to the users data, which is coercive.
Pretty sure these guys are referring to "cookies", which 99% of websites, including google, youtube, and amazon use to track your browsing history to determine what kind of ads they should post to you. Its not them selling your info, its simply advertising. If they see that you were looking for skis, they're gonna start posting ads for skis around to get you to buy some...
Mark knows what he is talking about. The senators have no clue. Privacy on the internet has never existed and it will never exist. People should be more aware of that.
How do they not get "the advertisers don't know who their ads are shown to"? That's exactly how television advertising works! You get an ad served because you tune to a TV channel you like, and the advertiser is targeting people who like that channel. But it doesn't mean the advertiser knows your identity. This whole debate is stupid.
He doesn't seem to get it. The advertisers say "hey facebook, show these ads to these types of people". Facebook says "ok!". The advertiser has no access to data. It does not see any of this process. They have no idea who their ads were shown to. I don't know why this is difficult to understand.
what I don't understand is this...i have NEVER mentioned/liked/shared/etc any fashion related stuff on Facebook but yet always get advertisements for fashion sites I have visited outside of facebook...can someone explain?
the sites you visit store facebook cookies on your browser essentially so facebook can see some of your internet history. But this is only for websites who choose to be a part of facebook's program. Websites will opt into this program because they make more money.
The problem is super obvious watching this. The people in charge asking the questions are so clueless about how any of these systems work that they cannot frame an intelligent question no matter how hard they try. They are trying to regulate something they are unable to grasp the fundamentals of.
1. Deleted data are not valid for advertisers as it doesn’t have to apply anymore. 2. Advertisers DON’T have access to any user data besides their own. Facebook has the access and facebook targets the group advertisers ask for. That is how majority of modern marketing companies works. 3. Are these senators playing stupid or do they really have some issues with basic understanding?
i don't really understand what the problem is with being advertised stuff that you might like. That sounds way better than seeing ads of some useless garbage.
He is trying so hard to ask the "right" question, but unfortunately he doesn't have a clue.....
he still 10 times better than other senators
That’s because most people have no idea how cookies work (no, not the food)
They had to get the Kennedy in on this action, he's the potential nominee for the democratic party in 2020
Shana N No, he isn’t. Don’t lie. He has ZERO charisma
Bernie is lookin to run again it seems and if he does he’ll be the favorite
He was asking a good question but he couldn't frame it😐
dumb question
Nervous breakdown
I agree. He had a good point he was trying to get too but sadly he wasn’t able to express himself adequately which is disappointing because 1) he’s a young congressman and 2) he’s a KENNEDY!! 🤦🏻♀️ *smh*
Just overall with these headings it seems to me that no one really prepared for what they were going to ask. Like properly prepare - with so many Gen Yers, millennials and even some Gen X-ers available to tap as resources to research, better understand and provide insight on the practical use of the platform it seems to me the US Congress & Senate woefully failed in their duties to get the issue right and get Facebook to really implement change. In most instances you could see Mark Zuckerberg trying not to LOL at the ridiculous questions they were asking.
It’s a shame.
ayush sharma he was essentially asking how all if it works.
whether facebook uses deleted Data
1:30 Good zoom.
Martin Shewfelt intense red boiii
All it need is dramatic music. Like the one with squirrel. Anyone remember the squirrel?
I like that squirrel.
Dramatic effect
Reminds me of when the camera zooms in during like parks n Rec or the office
Looks like the senator is more nervous than zuck himself.
Amal Francis it's cuz he got the ZUCC from him last night
not a senator
Milbox R what is ZUCC?
because he love ski and never gets the ads for ski promos
Amal Francis no he is asking exact questions, don't go on facial expression
I bet Zucks yellow drink is just machine oil for his new "human facial expression" mechanism...
BaDumTsss your comments are so funny. I liked it.
BaDumTsss 😂😂😂
Wow nice one
BaDumTsss swear to god that’s dumb
@@ananya855 It's a joke.
very good detailed questioning - he covered all the bases and didn't allow him any wiggle room but still allowed him to answer every question. Good going Joe!
This feels like a new facebook user asking questions in the help center.. just that you’re getting your answers directly from the man himself.
Hahahahah bro
Well put.
look at ol zuccyberg sippin oj like a regular old human
That's not oj.
Shoulders of Giants stfu
He is a regular human not some cyborg
Is it really normal to sit in a congressional hearing sipping oj tho
saksham gami haha you are wrong he is zuckerborg
its amazing how people have been using internet for 20 years and after all that time still have no clue of how it works , thats the real issue not FB
Cuz they rather make us take psychology classes than requiring computer science/technology classes at every level.
He actually does understand from what the comments are saying to people...
This is a Facebook not an Internet issue. You have no clue what you're talking about.
@@nurulqwe If you think only facebook collects, organize and use data on what you do on their platform, then yes, this is an internet's "issue" but honestly, is more about an user issue since most people that use internet don't really understand how it works and what it does in the background.
@@stormcry0 its only facebook issue. Internet has many ways of avoiding data leakage. This in not only facebook issue but also every platform on the internet especially google. Internet is so unregulated that these platforms can do whatever they want with the data you willingly/unwillingly gave them, but all these platforms can be regulated if the leaders are knowledgeable enough to do it. Not the internet but the platforms that abuse the internet.
It's painful to even watch
almost as painful as his lame rebuttal to Trumps SOTU address. I am sick of dim Kennedys that ride on the coat tails of JFK
Ya When I Think of His Situation !
I mean... not necessarily
they are not LISTENING... they come with a bunch of questions, do NOT listen to the answer, then jump to the next question they have written by who knows who.
Yocto I know. They don’t even let him answer before stopping him and asking another question. They need to let each other talk.
FB needs to do a lot on privacy and has many other issues, but these guys are asking the questions are just lacking knowledge of the whole thing -and manners !!
The best one is the one in which Marc says no to a big company only happening in America and the senator says "you were supposed to answer yes" and is knoked out.
Yocto very true...bless Mr MZ
After all this time...and there ia You tube even worse than FB , did not get sue .AIN'T FAIR !!!!!!!!
FB HAS HELP ALOT OF PEOPLE TO!!!
There are just some jealous people out there that want's to get rich with an evil way....
FB ask for agreements and WE SIGN FOR IT...
So let it be.....
If it was not for FB , me and family would have not met ever.... and me and my friends back in UK and here i am...across on the other earth, and FB brought me together with them all.
Just give them a chance to fixt things up, but don't shut FB .... what about us that only needs family and friends !? 😢
The more I hear about this the more I realized people don't know how the internet works
These congressman or women need to study about internet and computer before the ask any question..they just wasting time and money by asking dumb question.
oh so you have enough at this point? but net neutrality you could care less? same people making our laws for the internet are the same lobbyist in the companies giving away our data. stop being delusional and picking parts.
only astronaut He/She didn't even mention Net Neutrality. People just trying to find a fight here. Smh
Putera Usman I agree. They know nothing and this Kennedy doesn't seem smart!
This is why net neutrality failed. None of these old people understand the implications. Congress should have an age cut-off of about 30 years old.
He knows what he’s saying, he’s asking if private or deleted data can used for advertisers to show them a recommendation for a product or anything else from what I have seen in the comments and watched.
Also I believe he’s sipping on some oj which is considered the life nectar of all reptiles
do u know what does it called?
That's not oj.
it looks like its from a kids lunch box, he’s steeling kids lunchboxes.
spaghetti eddy He doesn’t even drink any lol
No OJ...Agent Orange...
Is it just me or _the Zucc_ changes expression at 2:04 when he hears "metadata" because someone is finally using technical terms?
Agglomerati Produzioni I saw that.maybe he thought “ maybe he knows something”
Just you
thats the "OJ" taking effect lol
Couldn’t this whole meeting just been done over email? :)
dont think these old people know what that is.
Jen Hughes, should have done it over Facebook messenger
AresZippy 😂🙏
Carlos A email is their bread and butter my guy
I think sooner or later this was going to happen due to the massive growth the internet is having. Sooner or later it was going to become an issue. People also need to understand that not everybody knows how a server works, how data is stored on the internet, how is shared, or what metadata is for that matter so it’s great that they are finally talking about it so people can get educated on it.
Zuckerburg looks like Data from Star Trek.
TheAsianRepublican My thought exactly !
Mark is like a rock.. no empaty ever.. no emotions.. no humanity.. just work, programming and business. anhuman of course regardless of the situation...
TheAsianRepublican, I just said that exact thing on another zucky video. Not only that, but he keeps talking about data.
On the Mark Dice Video about him he flashes a picture of Data.
funny because he also sells your data from star trek. Or non-star trek. He just sells your data I don't know where I was going with this. He looks like a worm tho.
0:23 i feel like he was trying to say "they tied but failed miserably" 😂😂
"Congressman, no"
"Senator, sure"
"Senator"
"Congressman"
"Senator, yes"
"Congressman, yes"
Why do I get the feeling that this was a robotic replica of Mark Zuckerberg, being controlled back at Facebook headquarters by Sheryl Sandberg and Larry Summers?
WILSON! He just being the polite person at the session
@@sunkenrandomness4266 Well... it's kind of expected to refer to a lawmaker by their title. Isn't it?
- Can advertisers have access to people's data?
- No, because of this this and that.
- Okay, I understand, but can advertisers have access to people's data?
- No. *gives an example*
- I see... Can advertisers have access to people's data?
- No.
- Interesting, Can advertisers have access to people's data?
So on and so on.
Yeah at least this guy was asking the right questions. He's not an expert in the subject but at least he's trying to pull on the key points and clarify areas
1:50 dude behind him when he said “No” 😂
1:47*
The saying "what you put out is what you get back" really applies to this situation.
So basicaly advertisers sell some ads to FB and then FB shows those ads to users that might be interested in them, but the data never leaves the FB servers and is never directly submitted to the advertisers?
correct. The advertiser just specifies what market they want to target, and facebook shows ads to users who match that target
This is the most beautiful thing for marketing. Every business owner dream for marketing and for people who need that last push to make that purchase. Genius!
Omg his small little juice bottle 👌🏻
Maribel Camarillo is oil
His
👌 Small...
or it's polyjuice. maybe the real mark zuckerberg is loocked up in some seven compartmented trunc.
Orange juice ?? LOL
It must be something else
Cyborg lubricant
It's called orange juice and vodka... Forgot what that's called
The information he gathers, the more he learns what it means to be human.
Cia nsa fbi should be next.
Bakwas bandh kar... CHUTIYE
Same thing...
And NASA
@@Migs1023 Why NASA? They don't collect data about people.
He is richer than everyone in that room combined. .02
so ?
but not powerful. In power its just opposite
@@potato_x69 yeah, so ?
A Kennedy and a Zuckerberg... Fascinating...
Wtf is this guy even talking about?
if you put your data public, then it is public even for advertisers. I think they haven’t thought long and hard enough with their questions and wasted so much time. i think facebook can find a way to educate facebook users constantly about the things they put in public because these users sometimes forget they put their information in public and gets very upset when suddenly they see ads relevant to their searches. Ads most of the time is annoying for social media users. I guess there should be an option on user’s profile to turn on or turn off ads
+Book Videos: An option to turn on and off ads is the dumbest idea ever.
First off, if the option was there to turn off ads, NOBODY would have ads on. That's just how it is.
Second, how will Facebook make their money? They won't be able to sustain themselves as a business and they will shutdown. The only way you can make Facebook run without ads is if you make it a paid service, and I guarantee you that everyone would take ads that are targeted to you based on things you "like" on your public Facebook page over a monthly bill.
I hate ads like the next person but getting rid of ads would be the worst business decision
Has anyone thought about how this can be addressed tho? Stupid or not what yall people do is just complain and ridicule but thanks for the attention and time.
this is actually already a thing on instagram. Photographs of shoes or bags get automatically match to a reseller for that exact item. I understand people are a bit scared about seeing something out of the ordinary the same way we are a bit scared when we first discovered smart phone. but this can actually be useful. What mark zuckerberg is trying to say to these senators when he answers “let me get back to you” IS “ Let me know when you catch UP!”
I hope there's a sequel to The Social Network
If anybody breaks into your house, goes through you personal details of Family n friends,FB sneakily does this online ! would you now approach the court or police?
Mark is so much more professional than I ever thought he would be, he’s so respectful to these idiots as well
Is that the younger version of Conan obrian? Lol
This dude is asking questions like a math test word problem. “If you have this information, provided by the people on Facebook, to use in ads that will target certain interest, using demographic data, where it come from?” That’s not a question he actually said but most of them are run on sentences that I would’ve gotten a 66 for on an essay for English class
So when do we the people get to ask Mr Zuckerberg a few questions? Because they suck at this....
This congressman was the only one with valid questions.
He actually asked some pretty good questions. Unlike the old timers who asked Mark.
Once a firm passes 50% of market share, the argument "if you don't like it, don't use it" becomes invalid.
This is sad. They didn't do their homework.. I've run an ad on Facebook. I can't see anyone's info. I simply key words like "dog lovers ages 19-37", or "pet toys" & because I'm selling pet clothes & toys Facebook controls & only shows my ad to people who are interested in those type of things anyway. I have no idea who the people are that's seeing my Ad besides country location & gender. I thing the government just wants to gain control over all of that user data.
Terrence Burwell It would also be stupid for Facebook to share the data with you. That data is an asset for them and sharing it would depreciate its value.
Seriously
That's exactly right. That's what I'm trying to tell people. The government is targeting mark as an opportunity to continue covering up how involved they already are in our private lives.
The only one who ask real questions, but not close enough.
Zuckerberg has a much deeper and clearer voice than I was expecting.
Boy did he struggle getting that one out. If he even actually got it out.
Man, Jesse Eisenberg has come a long way In his career.
Just in case anyone is wondering.. as someone who has advertised on Facebook I can confirm we have no idea what individuals we are specifically teaching until they click an ad and make a purchase. We only know that because obviously their name and information comes into our e-commerce website platform so we can fill their order. When building an ad, you choose which location, age range, interests, and behaviors you want to target. Typically millions of people are reached over time. We don’t know who we are targeting until they buy from us. Not sure why people are so weird about interest targeted ads.
oOh i sEe... sO hOw mUcH dId tHe lIzArD mEn PaY yOu oR aRe tHeY tHrEaTeNiNg yOuR cLoSe oNeS fOr YoU tO sPeAk FoR tHeM?????!!?!!?
When he drank that orange juice I felt so bad for him
This requires a police station not a court room drama
I’m confused on why people would be mad/scared about that tho? Like “HEY GUYS I LIKE SKIING !” *gets ads for ski gear* “WAIT A MINUTE WHY DO THEY KNOW I LIKE SKIS THEY SHOULDNT KNOW THAT!!” ????
1:30 Cameraman is having a seizure
It's all in the Help center. I bet they've never bothered looking it up.
at 3:40 Joe Kennedy nails it. Congress needs to write a law that strongly puts Users Data firmly in control of that user, thus strengthens and supporting the act of right to privacy for that user. Third parties must explicitly on an individual basis court the user for the data, and not attempt a consequential approach to the users data, which is coercive.
I like his little hairhat.
Pretty sure these guys are referring to "cookies", which 99% of websites, including google, youtube, and amazon use to track your browsing history to determine what kind of ads they should post to you. Its not them selling your info, its simply advertising. If they see that you were looking for skis, they're gonna start posting ads for skis around to get you to buy some...
He wasn't even listening to Zuckerberg's explanation
Mark knows what he is talking about. The senators have no clue. Privacy on the internet has never existed and it will never exist. People should be more aware of that.
3:20 No adverts are interesting to anyone. Infact the more you advertise the more likely I am to boycott your product.
How do they not get "the advertisers don't know who their ads are shown to"? That's exactly how television advertising works! You get an ad served because you tune to a TV channel you like, and the advertiser is targeting people who like that channel. But it doesn't mean the advertiser knows your identity. This whole debate is stupid.
I don’t feel like these Congressmen and women are qualified enough to ask about internet stuff
I like how when someone asks a dumb question, zuccccs reply starts with senator...
Senator doesn't even understand what he's asking.
That's an odd color for motor oil
He doesn't seem to get it. The advertisers say "hey facebook, show these ads to these types of people". Facebook says "ok!".
The advertiser has no access to data.
It does not see any of this process.
They have no idea who their ads were shown to.
I don't know why this is difficult to understand.
I mean the congress should pre work on their questions before questioning him ... So unprofessional
what I don't understand is this...i have NEVER mentioned/liked/shared/etc any fashion related stuff on Facebook but yet always get advertisements for fashion sites I have visited outside of facebook...can someone explain?
the sites you visit store facebook cookies on your browser essentially so facebook can see some of your internet history. But this is only for websites who choose to be a part of facebook's program. Websites will opt into this program because they make more money.
That Kennedy guy looks like the mono-rail carpet bagger from the Simpsons.
You're not allowed to be mad at Facebook for sharing & selling your information if you keep logging in and sharing your information.
How interesting hearings can get when you have qualified people asking serious questions..
is that arnold in the back
feels like majority of senators / congressmans don't know how ads work , how program/ internet works. lol
Senator was asking perfect questions but time limit was extending
I remember people, before this started, thought zuckerberg was going to get grilled by these guys.
I find it funny that no user checks the TOS and complains. Mark Zuck is a clever man.
I am suing them too
why this people put a lot of their personal information on Facebook?
Mjölnir THE HAMMER
Congress should have used Facebook ads prior to questioning...
1:32 😂😂😂 THEIR ZOOMING IN IN HIS WAFFLE FOREHEAD
He kept asking the same question even tho it was already answered
The last question was the most important one but it didn't get answered
I am so disappointed in Congress.
So, the T-3000 has the power to baffle people with stares?
I only understood him drinking orange juice
Why haven't they done any research on google beforehand? Or just made an ad account to explore? This is a little embarrassing to look at.
Joe Kennedy is very professional
They should of got some Congress people that actually understand Facebook advertising
This is congress hearing is so interesting and great short :]
this congressman looks like a live action version of that red head villain from the incredibles
The problem is super obvious watching this. The people in charge asking the questions are so clueless about how any of these systems work that they cannot frame an intelligent question no matter how hard they try. They are trying to regulate something they are unable to grasp the fundamentals of.
Why regulate something where people post everything they do in their daily lives?
Mark for Jail
These videos shows majority of senators really don't understand technology and algorithm..
1. Deleted data are not valid for advertisers as it doesn’t have to apply anymore.
2. Advertisers DON’T have access to any user data besides their own. Facebook has the access and facebook targets the group advertisers ask for. That is how majority of modern marketing companies works.
3. Are these senators playing stupid or do they really have some issues with basic understanding?
Congress has a looong way to go, but this representative is clearly a step in the right direction in terms of understanding things.
Put Mark in Jail
i don't really understand what the problem is with being advertised stuff that you might like. That sounds way better than seeing ads of some useless garbage.
It would be nice if the people who know something about this matter asked the questions
Anyone who doesn't know how cookies work should leave the internet
Correction, anyone who doesn't know how cookies work and have a problem with them should leave the internet
Everyone's making such a big deal out of this. Facebook is *not* selling your data, but is using it to advertise the right adverts. It's just cookies.