Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @flynnjp19
    @flynnjp19 3 года назад +14

    The submariner is more popular, but this 16600 Sea-dweller is the most beautiful and well proportioned Rolex sports watch ever...

  • @bloodymarvelous4790
    @bloodymarvelous4790 8 месяцев назад +4

    The Rolex Submariner is the ultimate dive watch.
    The Rolex Sea Dweller is the ultimate Submariner.
    If you're looking for a dive watch from Rolex, you're going to buy a Submariner.
    The only way you're going to buy a Sea Dweller, is if you're looking for a Sea Dweller. That makes you a connoisseur.
    The 40mm Sea Dwellers are built like a tank, without looking like a tank. It's the perfect tool watch.

  • @dk2853
    @dk2853 Год назад +3

    Love this watch, especially with the no-holes case. It's like a Submariner but better, and a good value because it sells for less than most Submariners. Underrated watch, and I will be adding one to my collection.

  • @Giovan_Nino
    @Giovan_Nino 5 лет назад

    Another great watch.. just when I thought the collection was reducing : )

    • @kairaul2695
      @kairaul2695 3 года назад

      Pro tip : you can watch series at flixzone. I've been using them for watching a lot of movies recently.

    • @rylandecker2503
      @rylandecker2503 3 года назад

      @Kai Raul Yea, been watching on flixzone for since december myself =)

  • @tsulas03
    @tsulas03 3 года назад

    I have a larger 8.5 wrist. I found the submariner too small. I've never tried a SD on. Will this wear bigger?

    • @daveswatch5825
      @daveswatch5825  3 года назад

      It wears taller on the wrist and thus slightly bigger than the submariner

    • @dk2853
      @dk2853 Год назад

      Try the new Sea-Dweller it's a 43mm case size, or the Deepsea which is even bigger.

    • @le_0318
      @le_0318 Год назад +1

      the 16600 will fit on your bigger wrist! trust me ;)

  • @OFD
    @OFD 2 года назад

    Best 👌

  • @donmaclean3016
    @donmaclean3016 4 года назад

    I have one , so sutle , so beautiful

  • @jimmyv.495
    @jimmyv.495 5 лет назад +2

    Why does it rattle like a cheap piece of shit? No ceramic, hollow end links, hollow center links, stamped metal swing arms, stamped metal clasp, stamped metal dive extension. That was made in the 2000s! How the hell did they get away with making a cheap rattling piece of garbage like that?

    • @randomdude6249
      @randomdude6249 3 года назад +6

      Aluminum is better than ceramic for bezel inserts in what is supposed to be a dive/tool watch, and the SD has solid end links. Replacing the bracelet is quite easy anyway. This was the last generation of true Rolex tool watches, after this they started to cater way too much to the luxury “hey I got money” market. Tudor offers much better bang-for-buck these days.

    • @closer71
      @closer71 2 года назад

      @@randomdude6249 I’m going to disagree with that.

    • @dk2853
      @dk2853 Год назад +1

      The later models did have solid end links, but hollow center links. It's just how Rolexes were made at the time.

    • @Leftystrat
      @Leftystrat Год назад +2

      No bling. Rock solid. True diver work horse. Later generations are Just pretty and big and never get wet

    • @smoll.miniatures
      @smoll.miniatures 11 месяцев назад

      😂