I'm 80 yrs old and will never see this resolved in my life. I've waited and watched for our constitution has already recognized all these rights and are therefore are the law of the land. There is no need it requirement for us to sue for the permission to enjoy these Rights.Don't tread on me.
In my opinion that's exactly what it is, it's a tactic. They're using our tax money against us. I think it's safe to say it's time to reestablish our government.
Thank you for all you guys are doing for the 2nd amendment here in Illinois. It amazes me that the Illinois legislature can take a insurance bill gut the whole bill and replace it with a gun ban which bands almost every thing in 72 hours they pass in the house, then to the senate, then to the governors desk and signed by the governor all in 72 hours. And ever since we have been living with this gun pan almost 2 years. I just wanted to say thanks for all your support. You’re giving us an Illinois. Please don’t give up. We need your help badly.
The 9th Circuit is dragging out Miller and Bonta as long as possible so they can get a new makeup of SCOTUS. What’s the remedy to stop this strategy? How long can they stall? Decades?
An "Assault Weapon" is a select-fire weapon; a weapon capable of firing either single fire or automatic fire, whichever is selected. The "Assault Weapons Ban" does not even address actual assault weapons.
Glad to hear you are young enough to outlast this infringement! Some of us maybe aren't that young and likely never going to see our rights reestablished.
They also denied review of Range v Garland and Vincent v Garland. I have been a prohibited person since 1985 for a nonviolent property crime convicted as a teenager so I've always viewed 2A as a privilege rather than a right that can be permanently stripped away for the slightest misstep. I appreciate all the work your foundation is doing in this area and hopefully there will be an eventual and favorable resolution pertaining to nonviolent felons and firearms ownership. As you are already aware, the pardon system is pretty much useless as they are rarely ever granted.
In 2020 the Supreme Court said it was to early to hear cases about election interference before the election, and to late to hear cases about election interference after it was already stolen. Will the same thing happen here? Is it to early to hear cases about how the government can't disarm it's citizens, and it will be to late after citizens use those weapons to defend themselves against disarmament by a tyrannical government. The two issues aren't unrelated either, the battle of Athens, Tennessee took place between civilians and their local government sheriff's office after they stole the ballot boxes and barricaded themselves inside a jail to "count" the ballots. If a well armed militia hadn't blasted their way in and seized the ballots before the national guard arrived then that Democrat sheriff would have won with less then 1/3rd the vote, gotten away with multiple murders, and imprisoned all of his political opposition.
The SCOTUS is going to have to face one of these cases sooner or later because they are just going to make their way right back up to them. "It is difficult to see how the Seventh Circuit could have concluded that the most widely owned semiautomatic rifles are not 'Arms' protected by the Second Amendment," Thomas wrote." Especially considering Heller and Bruen on common use arms and even Sotomayor's statement of the most popular rifle in America. The 7th is thumbing its nose at the SCOTUS and rejecting our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms so these cases in Illinois and Maryland will make their way right back up to the SCOTUS. The Second Amendment does not differentiate between arms and ARs are arms. The 7th by denying that fact by falsely stating that ARs are not arms are violating our Constitutional right and the law and the NAFGR needs to make that plain and clear in court.
Things have to go through the proper course. Baby steps.... Doesn't mean to not file to SCOTUS, just means this is something we should have expected until there is a final ruling in the lower courts
We need the supreme court to put an end to this assault weapon ban nonsense. Not only that, but theh should revisist BOTH national firearms acts and overturn them.
I ask this question often...Isn't there a Federal Judiciary Oversight Committee? With obvious errors by Federal Judges, why hasn't this committee stepped in and corrected them? Can you please do a video to explain how this does or doesn't work?
A right delayed is a right denied!! The 7th circuit will sit on this for years. SCOTUS Should have given a time frame for a ruling from the 7th circuit. I am 72 and I hope this gets ruled on by SCOTUS before I leave this earth. The problem in this country is that there is no repercussions to politicians who not only don’t follow the constitution but pass unconstitutional laws!!
Thomas absolutely spanked the Seventh Circuit. First, he said that by "contorting" what little evidence it had, the court found the AR-15 to be a military weapon. Next he said that the court then "tautologically" defined military weapons as that may be reserved for military service. Thomas then wrote that the Seventh Circuit's "contrived" non-militaristic definition seems "unmoored" from both text and history. Finally, Thomas stated that the lower court's definition was "nonsensical". Thomas's strong language toward to two anti-gun judges was the equivalent of taking them to the woodshed. He also warned them about what SCOTUS would do if they did not get the final decision right.
Great update as usual. Im in Illinois & am wondering how the trial in the Southern District with Judge McGlynn will affect our chances going forward? Keep up the good fight. You have my support!
@@buckshotscott2616 Judge McGlynn already placed an injunction on the PICA until it hit the 7th Circuit. Im betting he will now overturn PICA on the merits in September to send it to the 7th Circuit. They will do their best to delay delay delay in making a decision. Im guessing it will hit SCOTUS for their spring session in 2025. It would be hard for me to believe the 7th Circuit would agree with Judge McGlynn & overturn PICA.
I don't consider myself very smart, yet when I hear Justice Thomas speak, I understand and agree with every word he says. Whenever another justice dissents from Justice Thomas, it seems like mental gymnastics take place. As if upholding the Constitution is simple in spirit, yet not if try to circumvent it.
SCOTUS applied its normal process to this Interlocutry appeal, but also added unusually strong language to the denial aimed at the lower ciurcuit court.
On to the merits of the case! When the court does take this us, I predict the ruling WILL reflect the sentiment of Justice Thomas' statement today! Assault Weapons Bans WILL be struck down.
Here's the problem with all this. The 7th District and Illinois Supreme Court will drag and drag and drag and drag their feet and let it bounce around. It won't get back to SCOTUS in time. Democrats are trying like hell to change the political makeup of the court.
We need to get cases for body armour and knife bans to SCOTUS and make clear that arms means arms, which includes armour and knives, explosives, nukes, literally everything that can be used for defense.
Someone help make sense of this. If the Militia that fought the war against the British was the equivalent of our military today and used their personal firearms that each individual had before the war and then took home with them after the war, what makes any firearm a military only firearm? If you follow the law of text, history, and tradition, any firearm is legal, civilian, or military grade. Only in modern times were military firearms so-called outlawed to civilians. Wasn't there a time not too long ago that civilians could buy used military grade firearms. Maybe a 2A lawyer could unravel this mystery and use it to help the 2A cause for our freedom and rights as American citizens. Please pass this message on to others the more who know the more our freedom grows.
While it's understood all might be heading in the right direction, for the people of IL they are denied constitutional rights. In fact, by the time this makes it back to SCOTUS it can be years. States or politicians should not be allowed to knowingly violate constitutional law only to make private citizens spend resources only to get their rights back. Clearly "shall not be infringed" isn't worth the paper it's written on which is a shame. When you consider the age to buy these firearms and having their rights denied for 5, 10, 15 years... it represents a significant percentage of someone's life with Constitutional rights denied. SCOTUS knows all this yet allows this to drag on for years. I understand the interlocutory issue, but lower courts deliberately drag their feet which allows them to deny Constitutional rights of law abiding citizens by default. Rights delayed are rights denied. At the very least an injunction should have been given while this works its way through the court system. Currently, rights are denied while it works through the system essentially "guilty until proven innocent"
This fight will come to a head because real 2A Rights Orgs NAGR, GOA, FPC, SAF etc.actually do "Stand and Fight", the war will be won, as Jared at Guns and Gadgets RUclips says "Support those who support you".
Everyone is saying that the Rahimi case was a big loss but I think it may have been a big win in the fact that they said that someone can be disarmed only temporarily and the people who have been found guilty on some MISDEMEANOR OFFENCES have been disarmed for life and temporarily is much better than life,i bring up the found guilty part because people who have been convicted of MISDEMEANORS can still vote and they still have to serve jury duty and that makes them one of the PEOPLE and they also said that the second amendment is not a second class right and there is no second class people, so after some period of time ALL their rights should be restored, is this second amendment advocacy group trying to get that settled and do you have any idea of how long TEMPORARILY is,is it until all the sentence is served or a set amount of time,a life time ban on firearm ownership for a MISDEMEANOR is a cruel and unusual punishment especially since a MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION can not be punished by more than one year in a county jail (at least in Florida) so all the second amendment advocacy groups should be trying to use the language used in the SCOTUS that said people can only be disarmed temporarily and trying to get people's rights restored, of course Rahimi was a FELONY case and he was proven to be a danger to others and the SCOTUS still used the words TEMPORARILY DISARMED so MISDEMEANOR OFFENCES should be much easier to get rights restored
So when will SCOTUS actually take the case and make a ruling instead of remanding or denying or wait I forgot that did , the Rahimi case and that was a loss . So when it comes to a firearm cases they seem to kick the can down the road .
Support Our Fight HERE: nagr.link/x5s
Is there any chance yall could file a lawsuit against the lautenberg amendment on due process grounds?
It is unacceptable to deny rights, especially so over many years.
Ecsp when they know the lower courts will infringe still
90 plus years and counting :-0)
I'm 80 yrs old and will never see this resolved in my life. I've waited and watched for our constitution has already recognized all these rights and are therefore are the law of the land. There is no need it requirement for us to sue for the permission to enjoy these Rights.Don't tread on me.
But you have seen the Dawn(Heller) and Sunrise (Bruen).
It may be a few hours to reach Noon, but no one can stop that turn of the Erath.
A right delayed is a right denied !
Why do the people have to suffer the injustice of unconstitutional laws and rulings in the interim??
The founding fathers were not concerned about certain types of weapons but rather certain types of government.
Thank you - to both of you and your teams - for following through on this and keeping us updated!!!
Unfortunate, but I know Hannah, NFGR, and all gun rights supporters will see this through to the end! Keep up the hard work!
Yeah, but will we be alive to see it?
@@mccjoe01 I think so!
The problem is the lower courts are all playing games and this could go on for years. Seems heller and bruen settled most of these issues.
In my opinion that's exactly what it is, it's a tactic. They're using our tax money against us. I think it's safe to say it's time to reestablish our government.
Thank you for all you guys are doing for the 2nd amendment here in Illinois. It amazes me that the Illinois legislature can take a insurance bill gut the whole bill and replace it with a gun ban which bands almost every thing in 72 hours they pass in the house, then to the senate, then to the governors desk and signed by the governor all in 72 hours. And ever since we have been living with this gun pan almost 2 years. I just wanted to say thanks for all your support. You’re giving us an Illinois. Please don’t give up. We need your help badly.
Great video, thanks for the update!
The 9th Circuit is dragging out Miller and Bonta as long as possible so they can get a new makeup of SCOTUS. What’s the remedy to stop this strategy? How long can they stall? Decades?
Thank you both for all your work. We are here to support you!
An "Assault Weapon" is a select-fire weapon; a weapon capable of firing either single fire or automatic fire, whichever is selected. The "Assault Weapons Ban" does not even address actual assault weapons.
Thanks guys, keep up the good work. Condolences to those living under the iron curtain in Illinois.
Thank you brother
Keep up the fight
Thanks for all your work for us citizens! God bless y'all
Glad to hear you are young enough to outlast this infringement! Some of us maybe aren't that young and likely never going to see our rights reestablished.
In it for the long haul, yes and AMEN!
The wheels of INjustice continue to roll along, and in the meantime, people's rights are infringed.
Thanks for the update!
Thanks Hannah…you are a gem! 💎
They also denied review of Range v Garland and Vincent v Garland. I have been a prohibited person since 1985 for a nonviolent property crime convicted as a teenager so I've always viewed 2A as a privilege rather than a right that can be permanently stripped away for the slightest misstep. I appreciate all the work your foundation is doing in this area and hopefully there will be an eventual and favorable resolution pertaining to nonviolent felons and firearms ownership. As you are already aware, the pardon system is pretty much useless as they are rarely ever granted.
In 2020 the Supreme Court said it was to early to hear cases about election interference before the election, and to late to hear cases about election interference after it was already stolen.
Will the same thing happen here? Is it to early to hear cases about how the government can't disarm it's citizens, and it will be to late after citizens use those weapons to defend themselves against disarmament by a tyrannical government.
The two issues aren't unrelated either, the battle of Athens, Tennessee took place between civilians and their local government sheriff's office after they stole the ballot boxes and barricaded themselves inside a jail to "count" the ballots. If a well armed militia hadn't blasted their way in and seized the ballots before the national guard arrived then that Democrat sheriff would have won with less then 1/3rd the vote, gotten away with multiple murders, and imprisoned all of his political opposition.
Sadly, this is what I'm anticipating:
Justice Thomas: The Seventh Circuit's reasoning is nonsensical.
Seventh Circuit: Hold my beer.
You did a great Job Hannah/team
The SCOTUS is going to have to face one of these cases sooner or later because they are just going to make their way right back up to them.
"It is difficult to see how the Seventh Circuit could have concluded that the most widely owned semiautomatic rifles are not 'Arms' protected by the Second Amendment," Thomas wrote."
Especially considering Heller and Bruen on common use arms and even Sotomayor's statement of the most popular rifle in America. The 7th is thumbing its nose at the SCOTUS and rejecting our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms so these cases in Illinois and Maryland will make their way right back up to the SCOTUS. The Second Amendment does not differentiate between arms and ARs are arms. The 7th by denying that fact by falsely stating that ARs are not arms are violating our Constitutional right and the law and the NAFGR needs to make that plain and clear in court.
These lower courts need to actually follow precident. No, correct that, the lawmakers need to stop passing unconstitutional legislation.
Thank you
Things have to go through the proper course. Baby steps.... Doesn't mean to not file to SCOTUS, just means this is something we should have expected until there is a final ruling in the lower courts
We need the supreme court to put an end to this assault weapon ban nonsense. Not only that, but theh should revisist BOTH national firearms acts and overturn them.
And machine guns.
I ask this question often...Isn't there a Federal Judiciary Oversight Committee? With obvious errors by Federal Judges, why hasn't this committee stepped in and corrected them? Can you please do a video to explain how this does or doesn't work?
A right delayed is a right denied!! The 7th circuit will sit on this for years. SCOTUS Should have given a time frame for a ruling from the 7th circuit. I am 72 and I hope this gets ruled on by SCOTUS before I leave this earth. The problem in this country is that there is no repercussions to politicians who not only don’t follow the constitution but pass unconstitutional laws!!
Hello from California. I’m hoping I can ritualistically dispose of my fin grips and magazine locks within my lifetime.
Thanks for the update and appreciate your hard work
Thomas absolutely spanked the Seventh Circuit. First, he said that by "contorting" what little evidence it had, the court found the AR-15 to be a military weapon. Next he said that the court then "tautologically" defined military weapons as that may be reserved for military service. Thomas then wrote that the Seventh Circuit's "contrived" non-militaristic definition seems "unmoored" from both text and history. Finally, Thomas stated that the lower court's definition was "nonsensical". Thomas's strong language toward to two anti-gun judges was the equivalent of taking them to the woodshed. He also warned them about what SCOTUS would do if they did not get the final decision right.
@@A_CaatDo you also claim to live in florida? You should be preaching to the segment of society that is actually harming people.
So the court of appeals just plays keep away!
Great update as usual. Im in Illinois & am wondering how the trial in the Southern District with Judge McGlynn will affect our chances going forward?
Keep up the good fight. You have my support!
I like our chances in the District Court. If the 7th Circuit blows it, I hope they at least move fast so it can move forward.
@@buckshotscott2616 Judge McGlynn already placed an injunction on the PICA until it hit the 7th Circuit. Im betting he will now overturn PICA on the merits in September to send it to the 7th Circuit. They will do their best to delay delay delay in making a decision. Im guessing it will hit SCOTUS for their spring session in 2025. It would be hard for me to believe the 7th Circuit would agree with Judge McGlynn & overturn PICA.
I don't consider myself very smart, yet when I hear Justice Thomas speak, I understand and agree with every word he says.
Whenever another justice dissents from Justice Thomas, it seems like mental gymnastics take place. As if upholding the Constitution is simple in spirit, yet not if try to circumvent it.
Y'all removing comments. Just proves my point. They are about the money. They live and die with the courts. They are not interested in me and you
Great Gun Rights Organization 👍💪👍👍💪👍👍
SCOTUS applied its normal process to this Interlocutry appeal, but also added unusually strong language to the denial aimed at the lower ciurcuit court.
The Constitution was written in favor of people not of Governments.
-Combat Vet
On to the merits of the case! When the court does take this us, I predict the ruling WILL reflect the sentiment of Justice Thomas' statement today! Assault Weapons Bans WILL be struck down.
How long before they figure out that a pen can be an assault weapon. After all anything used to assault someone is an assault weapon.
Here's the problem with all this. The 7th District and Illinois Supreme Court will drag and drag and drag and drag their feet and let it bounce around. It won't get back to SCOTUS in time. Democrats are trying like hell to change the political makeup of the court.
We need to get cases for body armour and knife bans to SCOTUS and make clear that arms means arms, which includes armour and knives, explosives, nukes, literally everything that can be used for defense.
Keep up the good work.
Talk about painting oneself into a corner… the next technology or design will not be in common use. Who the heck came up with these limitations on …
Sling shots are dangerous weapons, David Versus Goliath!
I donate $10 a month I will have to up it to $15 so we can continue this fight
I donate $50 a month to protect our Second Amendment Rights
@@samuelhshoemaker5541great work brother
Thank y’all so much for your support!! We could not do this without you!
@@hannahhill2781freedom!
@@hannahhill2781Thank you for your hard work. Never give up
Someone help make sense of this.
If the Militia that fought the war against the British was the equivalent of our military today and used their personal firearms that each individual had before the war and then took home with them after the war, what makes any firearm a military only firearm?
If you follow the law of text, history, and tradition, any firearm is legal, civilian, or military grade.
Only in modern times were military firearms so-called outlawed to civilians.
Wasn't there a time not too long ago that civilians could buy used military grade firearms. Maybe a 2A lawyer could unravel this mystery and use it to help the 2A cause for our freedom and rights as American citizens.
Please pass this message on to others the more who know the more our freedom grows.
While it's understood all might be heading in the right direction, for the people of IL they are denied constitutional rights. In fact, by the time this makes it back to SCOTUS it can be years. States or politicians should not be allowed to knowingly violate constitutional law only to make private citizens spend resources only to get their rights back. Clearly "shall not be infringed" isn't worth the paper it's written on which is a shame. When you consider the age to buy these firearms and having their rights denied for 5, 10, 15 years... it represents a significant percentage of someone's life with Constitutional rights denied. SCOTUS knows all this yet allows this to drag on for years. I understand the interlocutory issue, but lower courts deliberately drag their feet which allows them to deny Constitutional rights of law abiding citizens by default. Rights delayed are rights denied. At the very least an injunction should have been given while this works its way through the court system. Currently, rights are denied while it works through the system essentially "guilty until proven innocent"
This fight will come to a head because real 2A Rights Orgs NAGR, GOA, FPC, SAF etc.actually do "Stand and Fight", the war will be won, as Jared at Guns and Gadgets RUclips says "Support those who support you".
Everyone is saying that the Rahimi case was a big loss but I think it may have been a big win in the fact that they said that someone can be disarmed only temporarily and the people who have been found guilty on some MISDEMEANOR OFFENCES have been disarmed for life and temporarily is much better than life,i bring up the found guilty part because people who have been convicted of MISDEMEANORS can still vote and they still have to serve jury duty and that makes them one of the PEOPLE and they also said that the second amendment is not a second class right and there is no second class people, so after some period of time ALL their rights should be restored, is this second amendment advocacy group trying to get that settled and do you have any idea of how long TEMPORARILY is,is it until all the sentence is served or a set amount of time,a life time ban on firearm ownership for a MISDEMEANOR is a cruel and unusual punishment especially since a MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION can not be punished by more than one year in a county jail (at least in Florida) so all the second amendment advocacy groups should be trying to use the language used in the SCOTUS that said people can only be disarmed temporarily and trying to get people's rights restored, of course Rahimi was a FELONY case and he was proven to be a danger to others and the SCOTUS still used the words TEMPORARILY DISARMED so MISDEMEANOR OFFENCES should be much easier to get rights restored
So when will SCOTUS actually take the case and make a ruling instead of remanding or denying or wait I forgot that did , the Rahimi case and that was a loss . So when it comes to a firearm cases they seem to kick the can down the road .
SCOTUS is not pro 2A but instead of owning up to their belief they are playing games so people will keep wasting time and money with lawsuits.
Gaslighting.
🇺🇲
There always passing the buck
2️⃣🅰️✊
Yeah, because you jumped the gun. Do it properly. Stop wasting time trying to push interlockatory cases.
Thank you so much for your hard work .and support 2nd amendment right.👍👍👍👍🫡🫡