@@kgw100aint no way people are waiting weeks let alone months going through paperwork court and money getting these people trespassed when they could just handle it as a self defense matter on their own property
This is ridiculous... As a PSG, I've had a Soldier return from a one year deployment. My Soldier had a small house... and found a squatter living there and using/selling/sold most of his stuff. Before block leave. Every Soldier in my Platoon went to his house. We didn't let the squatter leave. The squatter had to get my Soldiers stuff back and or pay for it. The squatter had to get his friends and family members pay the bill(s). It was a mess. We ALL almost got charged with kidnapping. FAFO!!!
In California there is stand your ground at home (“castle doctrine”) that allows the use of lethal force to defend your home from intruders. I think this is pertaining more to people breaking and entering with you currently occupying the home.
You got a lot of professional Landlords with so many houses they can't keep track of who's in them over there? If they're there for a day or two with the shit they can carry, the cops just trespass them and take them the fuck away. That ain't squatting. And if you got that many houses... I ain't got shit for sympathy. Sell some... Quit being so greedy. This is why there's a damn housing crisis
I don't understand this. I live in rural Kentucky. Everyone knows about the bottoms. Law enforcement is thin on the ground. We all are armed and we are polite.❤
Back in the old days, when the colonies and frontier was being settled, anyone can claim land they lay stake in since Government couldn't say no as it was virgin real estate. As long as you took care of the land and did whatever you want from it, it was automatically yours. When governments got more centralized and populations grew, it became necessary to record keep plots of lands and who owned it. Modern day squatting rights came to be when renters or homeowners couldn't be quickly evicted from a residency due to safety concerns. Renters had the option to get their finances settled if they're behind in payments until the tenants start a court eviction and bankers let homeowners behind in mortgage payments living in the house as a abandoned home is worth less than the surrounding housing and can drastically depreciate the rest.
If the trespasser does not leave after your request to leave - and it would appear to a reasonable person that the trespasser poses a threat to the property or the occupants - you may use reasonable force to make the trespasser leave. Reasonable force means the amount of force that a reasonable person in the same situation would believe is necessary to make the trespasser leave. If the trespasser resists, you may increase the amount of force you use in proportion to the force used by the trespasser and the threat the trespasser poses to the property.
The fact squatters have more rights than the actual property owner and the government wont put a stop to it knowing the squatter knows what they are doing is wrong but "f it". We civilized humans should be aloud to bet them.
Replacement = they get your house they get to buy guns and vote and get licenses. You are being replaced disarmed and pushed out of your home Watch what you post your hate is obvious lol trudeau is on his way to dictatorship too
In California, you also have to have been paying the property taxes for the five year period. This makes adverse possession nearly impossible in California.
Missing from this is a trespass, if it's just some people with belongings thst they can carry... The police will trespass them and kick em out then and there. Squatting only becomes an issue if they have furniture and can make the police believe that they've been there for a long time. And politically... People who have so mny properties that they can't keep track of who is living in them .. are why there's a housing crisis and it's hard to have any sympathy for them at all At what point do you lose track? 6 houses? 10? 14? Driving up rent from greed, holding them as Air BNB, instead of selling them to families who would like to buy.
Adverse possession is how i got my property. Im all for squatting but doing it with morals intact. I pay taxes on the land i mantain it and all the land owners are happy to have me.
I can understand the arguments for squatter's rights in a circumstance where they've been living there for 25 or 30 years and the owner has never even bothered to check on their property (clearly at that point the property owner just didn't even give a fuck about it) but in most cases I feel like the legal system is just rigged against the homeowner when it comes to the argument of squatters.
In other words. You need to live on your property or have someone live on it via a contract or as a tenant to keep other people off the property. Having a Glick chambered in 9nn also helps a well.
How isnt this unconstitutional. Also, all of that work just to have squaters removed or charged? There is no compensation for the landowner it seems and also what if they had a potential tennant wanting to move in; would that expedite the trespass?
I used to hop trains and squat abandoned homes/buildings a bunch. I never stayed in one plac e long enough to seriously try for squatters rights but I knew 2 people who successfully got ownership of homes in New Orleans. Very much abandoned places they fixed them up lived in them for years. I always took off if an owner came by but had a few occasions where I was told I could stay in exchange for watching after the place and maintaining it. Never stayed long but lots of people squat and aren't douchebags about it, you can make them evict you but it's kinda a pain, best to just move on find a new place if you're discovered. But in places with tons of abandoned homes I think squatting is a good thing when done right. Couple places I was we knew all the neighbors and they liked us, we'd always help them out, be courteous generally didn't have issues.
The owner can rent the house and the “Renters” can kick out the squatters but Not the owners because that would be their dispute not the owners. They can solve it with the police once the “Renters” have kicked them out.
Nice to learn about this. Though it won't become something I'll ever need, it's good to know what it really, legally, is. Misinformation is rampant, thanks for giving us actual information.
This sounds like a business opportunity. Where the house owner pay someone for the service of hassling, and bothering the squatter until the give up. 🤔
In AZ squatters get the pew pew. In high school we were warned not to hang out in these places cuz old timers could legally shoot us. Sooooooooo theres that way to handle it........
@germanshepherd6638 I had to Google it, but thats the law! Now I know what it's called ^_^ I miss how AZ used to be. Learning we've become a blue state killed me a little. I have two German Shepherds!
Wait wait wait... does the 2nd ammendment not apply here if theyre on your property? Seems a hell of a lot quicker of a solution than handling it softly, taking the time and financial brunt of the matter
they can only invoke squatters rights if they are the sole occupant. its still your property dont get me wrong but your family isn’t in danger and using force on squatter is most definitely illegal and you would have to jump through the bureaucratic hoops
@@Getoffmylawnbrit i mean if they are squatting in your unoccupied second house or etc its not as if you are in ANY imminent danger therefore you cant use violence. this is like… common sense? you just have to file the paperwork to kick them out before the property becomes theirs (idk maybe it makes more sense to me personally because it would take 30 years in my state and at that point i definitely wasnt maintaining that property or i would have already kicked the squatter out)
@AcceptableAsGenerallyDecent but you're property was stolen. Which would indirectly possibly put you in danger. Point being I don't think thieves should have rights
It amazes me that any Americans are mad about this when your own government has done this since the statt of the country. Signed a treaty with the natives and mexicans and then proceeded to send "settelrs" to go live on the land anyways
I unironically don't care. In so far as, we could handle this and we're acting like it could not be worse. I don't care in so far as, the solution to this is the same solution to homelessness, drug pandemics, wounded warriors, to mental health and budgets. I don't care in so far as I am an American Imperialist and if we can't go to them, bring them to us and we- will- mold them. What bothers me is that it's not going to happen. What worries me is the uncountable sufferings every instant being caused by mismanagement, alone. Not to mention legitimate horrors. What worries me is that I'm a scitzophrenic sociopath who needs to conjure empathy from the void just to feel a modicum of understanding. Yet, the average Joe is selfishly yelling to hurt, maim, and defile human beings who; Mind you, they were tricked into coming and now many want to leave but can't. I don't need to care about Americans. We're screwed up by default and KOS anything that even smells of a threat.
As a Native to this country way before the others showed up...squatters we accepted and fed ...but they decided to rob rape and kill instead...but we'll forget that part😉
You should all educate yourselves instead of lining up to talk shit. Make a fucken point or move on. I'm open for discussion but now bullshit ...but apparently that all y'all got
Isn't it great knowing you fight an served are military only to return to the same shit my father an other vets got since the end of ww1 PBS Documentary: The March of the Bonus Army / SFDVTV ruclips.net/video/mSC1lbfXfRQ/видео.html
Squatters that "disappear", cannot squat again.
Most of the times the property owner and a few friends show up in the night 😂
"squat or not; its my house and my glock"
@@kgw100aint no way people are waiting weeks let alone months going through paperwork court and money getting these people trespassed when they could just handle it as a self defense matter on their own property
I got the excavator
@@DamBlairFamgo be soft elsewhere
This is ridiculous... As a PSG, I've had a Soldier return from a one year deployment. My Soldier had a small house... and found a squatter living there and using/selling/sold most of his stuff. Before block leave. Every Soldier in my Platoon went to his house. We didn't let the squatter leave. The squatter had to get my Soldiers stuff back and or pay for it. The squatter had to get his friends and family members pay the bill(s). It was a mess. We ALL almost got charged with kidnapping. FAFO!!!
In California there is stand your ground at home (“castle doctrine”) that allows the use of lethal force to defend your home from intruders. I think this is pertaining more to people breaking and entering with you currently occupying the home.
Here in TN you enter a home you will meet the warrant called .45. You’ll leave walking or being rolled out your choice.
You got a lot of professional Landlords with so many houses they can't keep track of who's in them over there?
If they're there for a day or two with the shit they can carry, the cops just trespass them and take them the fuck away. That ain't squatting.
And if you got that many houses... I ain't got shit for sympathy. Sell some... Quit being so greedy. This is why there's a damn housing crisis
I don't understand this. I live in rural Kentucky. Everyone knows about the bottoms. Law enforcement is thin on the ground. We all are armed and we are polite.❤
It sounds dumb. If someone legally bought it. And someone breaks in. That's called burglary
How the fuck do they ‘possess’ the land with no deed?
Back in the old days, when the colonies and frontier was being settled, anyone can claim land they lay stake in since Government couldn't say no as it was virgin real estate.
As long as you took care of the land and did whatever you want from it, it was automatically yours.
When governments got more centralized and populations grew, it became necessary to record keep plots of lands and who owned it.
Modern day squatting rights came to be when renters or homeowners couldn't be quickly evicted from a residency due to safety concerns.
Renters had the option to get their finances settled if they're behind in payments until the tenants start a court eviction and bankers let homeowners behind in mortgage payments living in the house as a abandoned home is worth less than the surrounding housing and can drastically depreciate the rest.
If the trespasser does not leave after your request to leave - and it would appear to a reasonable person that the trespasser poses a threat to the property or the occupants - you may use reasonable force to make the trespasser leave.
Reasonable force means the amount of force that a reasonable person in the same situation would believe is necessary to make the trespasser leave.
If the trespasser resists, you may increase the amount of force you use in proportion to the force used by the trespasser and the threat the trespasser poses to the property.
The fact squatters have more rights than the actual property owner and the government wont put a stop to it knowing the squatter knows what they are doing is wrong but "f it".
We civilized humans should be aloud to bet them.
Replacement = they get your house they get to buy guns and vote and get licenses. You are being replaced disarmed and pushed out of your home
Watch what you post your hate is obvious lol trudeau is on his way to dictatorship too
Squatters rights should only apply to government owned properties. Not private citizens
Long term empty "investment property" houses would be the least objectional. IMHO.
In California, you also have to have been paying the property taxes for the five year period. This makes adverse possession nearly impossible in California.
So long as they dont pay property taxes they can not take it over? Still insane that they are not immediately trespassed.
Squatters exploit loopholes that aren't available in every state. Call your congressman!
Call congressman in order to handle the issue or in order to find out local loopholes
This is ridiculous. Squatters should not be this protected
The law was actually to prevent banks and people who rent homes from predatory practices, sadly laws like these get taken advantage of
@corbis7765 the what lease and renters laws are for. And every state has these laws as well.
Missing from this is a trespass, if it's just some people with belongings thst they can carry... The police will trespass them and kick em out then and there.
Squatting only becomes an issue if they have furniture and can make the police believe that they've been there for a long time.
And politically... People who have so mny properties that they can't keep track of who is living in them .. are why there's a housing crisis and it's hard to have any sympathy for them at all
At what point do you lose track? 6 houses? 10? 14? Driving up rent from greed, holding them as Air BNB, instead of selling them to families who would like to buy.
I heard my (extra political) uncle talking about this in the morning. Let's just say he didn't appreciate it. I'm not white, I'm actually Hispanic.
So a family can go on a long vacation and come back to squatters?!
I mean there’s a lot shovels in the world, and a whole lot of dirt to be dug up.
Adverse possession is how i got my property. Im all for squatting but doing it with morals intact. I pay taxes on the land i mantain it and all the land owners are happy to have me.
If they're there without permission, they've broken in, right? Why isn't this just breaking and entering?
And lived there for 5 years? How?
I can understand the arguments for squatter's rights in a circumstance where they've been living there for 25 or 30 years and the owner has never even bothered to check on their property (clearly at that point the property owner just didn't even give a fuck about it) but in most cases I feel like the legal system is just rigged against the homeowner when it comes to the argument of squatters.
In other words. You need to live on your property or have someone live on it via a contract or as a tenant to keep other people off the property. Having a Glick chambered in 9nn also helps a well.
How isnt this unconstitutional. Also, all of that work just to have squaters removed or charged? There is no compensation for the landowner it seems and also what if they had a potential tennant wanting to move in; would that expedite the trespass?
Unimaginable.
I used to hop trains and squat abandoned homes/buildings a bunch. I never stayed in one plac e long enough to seriously try for squatters rights but I knew 2 people who successfully got ownership of homes in New Orleans. Very much abandoned places they fixed them up lived in them for years. I always took off if an owner came by but had a few occasions where I was told I could stay in exchange for watching after the place and maintaining it. Never stayed long but lots of people squat and aren't douchebags about it, you can make them evict you but it's kinda a pain, best to just move on find a new place if you're discovered. But in places with tons of abandoned homes I think squatting is a good thing when done right. Couple places I was we knew all the neighbors and they liked us, we'd always help them out, be courteous generally didn't have issues.
Here in s.a. we have an understanding....we simply state " squatters rights"...thus is the state of our country....
The owner can rent the house and the “Renters” can kick out the squatters but Not the owners because that would be their dispute not the owners. They can solve it with the police once the “Renters” have kicked them out.
Nice to learn about this.
Though it won't become something I'll ever need, it's good to know what it really, legally, is.
Misinformation is rampant, thanks for giving us actual information.
This sounds like a business opportunity. Where the house owner pay someone for the service of hassling, and bothering the squatter until the give up. 🤔
There is one in L.A, the squatter squad.
In AZ squatters get the pew pew. In high school we were warned not to hang out in these places cuz old timers could legally shoot us. Sooooooooo theres that way to handle it........
Castle doctrine
@germanshepherd6638 I had to Google it, but thats the law! Now I know what it's called ^_^ I miss how AZ used to be. Learning we've become a blue state killed me a little. I have two German Shepherds!
Because calling the cops on them for trespassing is too unfair apparently
Vigilantes will be the next problem
not me losing my house and just squatting in it instead
or hear me out. might not be technicaly legal. buuuuut. gun? because gunners right
Why aren't they just charged with breaking and entering
OR you "handle" the matter outside the system.
I got a compost pile waiting on him
you can also countersquat i think
ruclips.net/video/g6yt7B5gCl4/видео.htmlfeature=shared
How do squatters get more rights than tenants?
Wait wait wait... does the 2nd ammendment not apply here if theyre on your property? Seems a hell of a lot quicker of a solution than handling it softly, taking the time and financial brunt of the matter
How to do it the legal way 😂
Daddy❤️💪🏻
If someone broke into your home you have the right to defend your self your family and your property but in this scenario you somehow lose that right?
they can only invoke squatters rights if they are the sole occupant. its still your property dont get me wrong but your family isn’t in danger and using force on squatter is most definitely illegal and you would have to jump through the bureaucratic hoops
@@AcceptableAsGenerallyDecent I know but why
It's for abandoned houses.
Like if you had multiple houses or inherited one and it's just sitting there in disrepair.
@@Getoffmylawnbrit i mean if they are squatting in your unoccupied second house or etc its not as if you are in ANY imminent danger therefore you cant use violence. this is like… common sense? you just have to file the paperwork to kick them out before the property becomes theirs (idk maybe it makes more sense to me personally because it would take 30 years in my state and at that point i definitely wasnt maintaining that property or i would have already kicked the squatter out)
@AcceptableAsGenerallyDecent but you're property was stolen. Which would indirectly possibly put you in danger. Point being I don't think thieves should have rights
Bro...I fucken like you...what's going on? Is this who you really are?
So you’re mad about facts.
@@MMXX_CE ruclips.net/video/2LW0TAWoZs8/видео.htmlsi=adU_UPKgVwTsj2Up
@@MMXX_CE let's talk facts then not stupid fucken rhetoric
Animals 😂
But people still call right wing people "conspircy??"
Im israli not l.am amrican i dont care about merica politic
Didn't qe squat in the middle east for 20 years?
Found the retard
Is that an invite to return?
@@RSKLove
Implying that we would wanna go back to Afghanistan or Iraq....
@@Menaceblue3 , it’ll happen eventually. Islamist are hateful and need some developed country to blame for their predisposition.
It amazes me that any Americans are mad about this when your own government has done this since the statt of the country. Signed a treaty with the natives and mexicans and then proceeded to send "settelrs" to go live on the land anyways
I unironically don't care. In so far as, we could handle this and we're acting like it could not be worse.
I don't care in so far as, the solution to this is the same solution to homelessness, drug pandemics, wounded warriors, to mental health and budgets.
I don't care in so far as I am an American Imperialist and if we can't go to them, bring them to us and we- will- mold them.
What bothers me is that it's not going to happen. What worries me is the uncountable sufferings every instant being caused by mismanagement, alone. Not to mention legitimate horrors.
What worries me is that I'm a scitzophrenic sociopath who needs to conjure empathy from the void just to feel a modicum of understanding. Yet, the average Joe is selfishly yelling to hurt, maim, and defile human beings who;
Mind you, they were tricked into coming and now many want to leave but can't.
I don't need to care about Americans. We're screwed up by default and KOS anything that even smells of a threat.
As a Native to this country way before the others showed up...squatters we accepted and fed ...but they decided to rob rape and kill instead...but we'll forget that part😉
You and your people lost
@@lenney872 and now it seems everyone is afraid we're coming back and taking the land back...you know invasion
poor victim. so sad. 😪
@@JOESMITH-qs8ue ruclips.net/video/2LW0TAWoZs8/видео.htmlsi=adU_UPKgVwTsj2Up
You should all educate yourselves instead of lining up to talk shit. Make a fucken point or move on. I'm open for discussion but now bullshit ...but apparently that all y'all got
Isn't it great knowing you fight an served are military only to return to the same shit my father an other vets got since the end of ww1
PBS Documentary: The March of the Bonus Army / SFDVTV
ruclips.net/video/mSC1lbfXfRQ/видео.html