Dr. David Spiegel's Full Testimony (DAY 20, Johnny Depp Defamation Trial)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 июн 2022
- Dr. David Spiegel's Full Testimony
Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Defamation Trial
Defense's Case in Chief: Week 5, Day 20
Date: Monday, May 23, 2022
Defense Witness: Dr. David Spiegel
Defense (Amber Heard) Attorney: Elaine Bredehoft
Plaintiff (Johnny Depp) Attorney: Wayne Dennison
0:22 - Direct Examination
14:42 - Voir-dire
22:43 - Direct Examination continued
1:41:44 - Cross Examination
2:36:02 - Redirect Examination
0:22 - Direct Examination (Elaine Bredehoft)
14:42 - Voir-dire (Wayne Dennison)
22:43 - Direct Examination continued (Elaine Bredehoft)
1:41:44 - Cross Examination (Wayne Dennison)
2:36:02 - Redirect Examination (Elaine Bredehoft)
You are wonderful & deserve many coffees as a ty for being one of the time stamp gods!
You see - This is exactly why Depp's legal team interviewed their expert for three hours before appointing her.
now i see why Dr Curry was questioned so much about the muffins. there was definitely some smart juice in them. throw Dr Seagull a xanax or something, my God lmao
It’s beautiful. It’s like Christmas. Magical the way Spiegal gets wrapped up in his own woollen string then opened and exposed to be the arrogant, self-important, gift of a man presented as an “Expert” by a defense that expected a cake-walk of a victory. The whole testimony is one of a few of my favourite things about this whole trial. 😂🎉
For the first examination by the psycho's lawyer, it seems most of what he's saying is what AH is like. I wonder if he's so confused about talking on how great he is, that he is actually talking about the Witch rather than Johnny. You can't analyze a person by a few cropped clips of someone on a video. You need to analyze in person for a time period.
Wayne Dennison has earmed a medal for wading through this guy's bs and word salad and maintaining his cool and professionialism.
I support this message.
Absolutely agree!
I could never imagine that cross examination can be so funny and entertaining. Dr Spiegel should try to get into stand up comedy, he is a natural comedian.
“I will concede to you I know nothing..” We can leave it there. 😂
🤣😂😋😊
"no further questions, your honour" moment
This started out as entertaining and then turned into an unmitigated disaster. Wow.
Turd's team made the mistake of telling there witnesses to speak directly to the jury. It comes off as creepy and uncomfortable af!
ikr, I was thinking the same thing
Definitely, it seems very intrusive and manipulative
This is actually considered good expert witness technique in many courts - either address responses to the jury or judge. They are your audience.
It also makes it harder for the lawyer to interrupt you as you aren't in eye contact with them until you finish and return your gaze to them.
The issue here is that Dr Speigel is argumentative in his responses.
2:57 So…Doctor.. Seagull..
Oh Elaine. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
2:57:31 * Laughing so hard 😆😂
@@Carlsen00 Thanks for correcting the time! Was having an Elaine moment there. 😂👏
@@nicholamc2629bahaha, I'm dying! You poor thing 😢🤣
I'd be terrified if I saw this dude walk in my hospital room. The dude just looks like he just makes random diagnosis up on people just to feed them drugs. Sketchy!
Just from looks alone you determined this?
Holy shit, what a dumpster fire! This man is wild! His statements make no sense! His demeanor is pretty strange. This trial truly had so many wild characters! Although not intentional, it was very entertaining! 🤪
He seemed to start out ok lmao 😂
2:05:59 “Willy Wonka doesn’t matter to you?”
So someone that doodles and eats candy has narcissistic traits! Lol
Cluster’s Last Stand”!😎Miss Valazqueth, Nice To Finally Meet You Mam❤
Dr Spiegel did really well until cross examination 😮
have you just redefined the word 'well'? Please, contact Merriam-Webster, Oxford and Cambridge dictionaries as they must all me mistaken.
Good one 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
He was scaringly “convincing” in his initial evidence - he appeared absolutely confident in his diagnosis of Johnny Depp…..until…..the cross examination.
After this court appearance I can’t believe anyone would want him to be their psychiatrist - how many other people has he misdiagnosed????
Much of his description of the way domestic abuse works was extremely good - his huge mistake had been his fixed, initial assumption that JD was the perpetrator….and he’s made his analysis of JD fit the character of the abuser, based solely on what AH had previously reported.
Even he admits that the perpetrator can outwardly appear the personable, rational one - and many victims will state that this can be a huge problem with professionals such as police and courts who find the perpetrator calm and reasonable….and believable - and thus they allow the abuse to continue😢
On cross examination his misguided assumptions became extremely obvious - which, of course is the WHOLE point of the Goldwater ruling - and shows how dangerous it is to make assumptions, judgements and conclusions the way he did.
Subsequently, over the next days and weeks, the evidence was very clear that AH’s tale was a complete fabrication, culminating in AH’s evidence which was absolutely nothing like a survivor of domestic abuse.
Your honor I don’t agree with thanks ms bredahoft we know u don’t. I also spelled her name wrong and idc
2:07:38 Calling the plaintiff an idiot in his deposition.
Christopher loydd should play him
This was painful to watch. Pretty bad witness Elaine!!
Elaine pretending she understands all these medical diagnosis but actually she parroting what she was told to say
2:35:16 “Do you know Marlon Brando used an earpiece?”
No he’s dead. 🤷🏼♀️😁. That’s the way I see him responding to that with an: “Oh well, can’t answer that question.” It’s absolutely terrible how he responded! He knows very well what was being asked, and he was being ugly. Also, seems AH lawyers told him everything but the truth, and embarrassed and ruined his testimony with the lies. He helped with the Idiot and watching Pirates to decide his cognitive function. Lordy Me!
Isn’t he dead? 😂😂😂
I know I'm on an island, but I learned alot from dr. Speigel lol
The most upsetting thing to come out of this is that he’s “treated” 10s of thousands of patients who needed expert help, instead they got this lunatic who passed exams and genuinely believes he is helping them
17:48 18:25 Promoting his book.
Processing Rates ? Johnny😎
Anyone who Ever got help from this QUACK , Needs to seek further help & he should be Fired!!
Spiegel brought onto himself all of the criticism and derision that was heaped upon him. He can't blame it on social media...he acted like a complete moron.
1:54:36 “Let’s start with the easy question then.”
Man is high on his own supply lmao
I can not understand why Judge Penny allowed this witness to go on and on interrupting, going off on unrelated tangents and preaching directly to the jury.
That definitely should not have been allowed, it made a mockery of the legal proceeding.
I think she let him go on and on in his crazy and aweful way to show he was crazy and aweful, and unbelievable.
@@teddycudaThat’s not a judge’s place and if it were, Judge Penny is a professional and wouldn’t display such blatant bias. It was up to Depp’s counsel to object.
2:58:26 I’m an adult, with an immediate-release Adderall prescription of 20 mg, 3x daily… 😳
1.44.57
& 2.21.24, 2.50.33
😂🤦♀️
Tomayto tomahto - Potayto, patahto idiom.
The only difference in the Goldwater rule & this case is 1 was running for President the other was running from Amber.
I was once perscribed Seroquel & refused to take it any longer as it caused me to vomit numerous times. As a Dr he should know It's listed side effects to Seroquel can be upset stomache, nausea, vomiting. Dear lord thank goodness hes not my Dr!!
Diognosis:
For me the penny dropped when he compared Mr Depp to a Pirate (Cpt Jack Sparrow) because Cpt Jack was always Drunk, what a disgusting comparison & cognitive diognosis!!
The judge worked my nerves during this examination😒 she let this man just ramble on, especially when there was an objection
Yeah, the judge was way too laid back with these people lmfao
22:10 "Intimate Partner Violence" and "Trauma" cannot be separated, Dr. Spiegel?! No wonder the attorney is not letting Dr. Spiegel off the hook because such an absurd claim from Dr. Spiegel is quite frankly wrong.
What he's saying is the IPV is a traumatic experience but a traumatic experience isn't necessarily IPV. For example, a traumatic experience could be from war or watching a parent die. He's not presenting the information for the everyday and in addition the lawyer is not responding correctly. The only reason I know this is because I have a degree in psychology. So in essence, you can't say that IPV isn't trauma but he's trying to back himself out of the interrogation which he did a poor job at.
Andddddd you’re a dummy!!! Lol
Dr Spiegal and the TMZ guy were the examples of how not to/how to be a credible witness
He didn't pronounce narcissistic correct one single time.
Man had cotton mouth for sure lmfao. Man was high on his own supply
Upon rewatching this, I think the Doctor was pretty good and well spoken, until the end. I am definitely team Johnny, but it seems like his lawyer handled the cross examination rather rough. That being said, he did his job to make this poor guy look like a ding dong. I found it difficult to watch. 😬
watch it sober next time.
He was pretty bad. He was comparing Depps examination performance to movies. He relied on hearsay about Depp being late or forgetting lines. When asked about Goldeater rule he evaded into position that everyone breaks it, which is poor excuse. He also looks and behaves crazily, actually asked with judge if he has to answer questions, his hairstyle and expressions are off.
Overall his testimony was seen as big loss for Heard.
This guy is reprehensible
It's really messed up how he thinks johnny is the narcissist in the relationship and abuser when there's only proof of amber doing anything.. smegle is a narcissist him self
I think the lunatic reviewed AH‘s records and not JD‘s. It’s 100% her 😅
???HOWZIT, it she MS ELAINE, gets to ask ? Not referred to in x exam. And how does she get away with talking back to judge? I wonder what she's doing now...she used up their time trying to 3:04:47 reframe same ? So the jury could hear her. And ?about him sleeping how does that make it ipv. They are reaching. Do you believe him? He's not a good witness in my opinion.
Mr. Spiegal, your cognitive load is telling tales on you! 😂
It’s really strange that Amber went thru the plaintiff’s psychology assessment and results, but Johnny refused.
she had to because she claimed to have PTSD
@@sarayuna9627 Ah, yes! Thank you!
She had to because her claims were that she had PTSD, it’s tied in with her lawsuit. That’s why she had to be examined, to attempt to validate her claims in court. He never claimed that so he didn’t have to be examined.
@@MarieAntoinetteandherlittlesis Thank you so much!!
@@MarieAntoinetteandherlittlesishe could’ve lol
I'm surprised this guy is a psychiatrist he knows nothing about medicines I was on Seroquel when I got out of the military to help me sleep and Seroquel would knock my ass out on top of that I was on Xanax Xanax knocks my ass out I'm not using drugs I haven't used drugs in 30 years this want to be professional doctor keeps running around in circles he just needs to get off the stand I wish I would have watched this live but unfortunately I had to work
The dosage they read was 175 for him. Three 50's and two 25's the 25's are IR. And the 50's are XR. That amount of Seroquel alone should not have anyone knocked out. I'd expect someone who has just started that medication would feel like a zombie on that dose initially, but it's a low dosage really.
I take 200mg in the morning. 😂 Then I have 250mg at night. And can take up to 200mg during the day (which I don't do often, but it wouldn't knock me out). I'm not knocked out at night time from the Seroquel, I can easily stay awake on that dose.
The other medications they are talking about for JD I'm also on the same class of drugs. I'm not knocked out, or pinging. I can just concentrate now.
I'm team Jonny. But if anyone is being knocked out by Seroquel, whatever dose, it's not being prescribed correctly. Even mixing prescription medications, you should absolutely not be knocked out at therapeutic doses. I believe you when you say you were knocked out by it, but I don't believe that your medication was titrated correctly having that happen to you.
I like dr spiegel and elaine. She would be a great barrister here in the uk
She's a snake
@@JA-zh8dg No. She's doing her job. Amber hired her, so it's her job to try and discredit Johnny's witnesses.
Don't make it personal when the attorneys are just doing their jobs