KINGS of College CLASH ! Final Match of the OCAA Indoor Tournament!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 апр 2022
- Humber vs Fanshawe
OCAA INDOOR TOURNAMENT
2022-3-31
Don’t Forget to Like and Subscribe so you don’t miss out on some great soccer videos!
Check us out on instagram for more videos you won’t see here!
@istsoccer
Like us on Facebook!
Want us to film your game?
Send us a message!
istsoccervideo@gmail.com 
Спорт
Fun story about why the second goal scorer didn’t celebrate. He used to play for the team in white, but the state boundaries moved meaning he had to change teams. He didn’t want to at first and neither did his father. They were forced to and since he moved he’s loved playing for the black team. That’s all a lie and I’ve just quoted Mighty Ducks
I love your content. Super fan. Please keep it up
6:48. #9 should have gotten a yellow for that shove. If not, then when the player ran next to him right after it, he gave him an elbow. Yellow cards for either one to stop the escalation.
now that was a good game can we get more of these games
Man has the quality dropped, Humber used to have ballers in every position back in the early 2000's. None of these guys would have made it on to those teams.
Yea great point man I am sure those old farts are all representing a nice sunday league team
@@TechnoRocka Some of those old farts went on to play for Team Canada's futsal team, some went on to play pro in other countries. None of the guys on the Humber team today would even make it on the bench. Real ballers, guys technically gifted who can make something out of nothing. These guys today are GARBAGE, have no skills.
I agree.. the quality has definitely dropped down.
Humber did not deserve a win at all. Looked lazy, slow, and just clocked out. No intensity or urgency till the dying seconds
fanshawe were super ready
Imagine not calling that penalty. Regardless of how horrid that header was, he was already in the air and the black player went right under him and fouled him in the box. That’s a penalty for white and a game changing goal, all day.
You’re delusional man, the guy doesn’t duck doesn’t stare at him before he simply puts his arm up and the guy jumps the arm up to protect himself he’s running backwards no real force in running backwards not enough for a penalty what so ever not even a foul
@@sokolqamili3894 Regardless of if it was intentionally done or not, refs don’t call based on intention, they make calls based on the play. He was running backwards and may have not meant to hit him from underneath, but it doesn’t matter, he was already in the air and the guy came from underneath him. It’s a foul.
@@Perqocet bro what are you saying man if we thought like that all contact would be a foul the guy jumps and one guy lightly just has his arm he doesn’t fly into him?? It’s not a heavy challenge the guy loses a bit of balance in the air and he falls and it’s not a hard fall
He doesn’t hit him from underneath he does not duck? Harry Kane has been caught where someone will jump and Kane will duck so they guy falls on his back now that’s a foul but not challenging for a header and just having your arm to slightly shield (not even like a forearm it’s a hand) is fine who say you have to jump with him? Idk if you have played at a high enough level but players are told against taller players that sometimes the best you can do is put them off balance now too much of this then of course penalty but this didn’t even a foul at the halfway line let alone in the box and so if he scores that header? Do you call it back for a penalty? No.
@@sokolqamili3894 I never said it was a hard foul, but it was a foul nonetheless. As well, he didn’t “lose his balance” in the air, that’s impossible. You don’t “lose your balance” in the air, you get acted upon by another force (in this case, the player running into him) and you get thrown off your normal trajectory. Regardless of if it is a hard foul or not, it’s a defenseless player in the air being taken out from underneath. Foul, penalty, plain and simple.
26 players combined for 5v5?🤣
🤣🤣🤣
5v5 black team parking the bus 😂
@@bobopopo11 yup
7:30 Neymar v columbia 2014 recreation??
7:42 the white player was in stride to go in for a header, unknown to the opposing player. there was no contact or pushdown on the opposing player prior to the header, yet the white player did come down on top of the opposing player causing an accidental injury. No foul, but free kick due to refs belief of injury.
That was the worst call by the ref. Should have been a penalty for white.
You defs don’t watch any soccer ever in your life if you think that is a penalty Jesus Christ
@@sokolqamili3894 Alright, I respect your opinion on that, but do you think it was a foul by the attacker?
@@jeffburnett9690 Heck no play shoulda just kept going
No foul at all
LOL a penalty for white going through defenders back? you're clueless. ref is 100% correct
I ain’t never seen a ref give a blue card before
its an indoor thing in the indoor leagues i played it just meant sit out for 30 seconds or something
Similar to hockey, a 2 minute penalty and your team has to play down a man (for those 2 minutes) or until the other team scores.
How many of these guys can become a pro?
00:31 oops he was late
7:55 was not a foul! Bad call. Overall great game to watch!!!
It was, 5 on the black teams head was turned in the direction of the ball and didn’t see white, white could see black and full forced went for the header even if it looked like a foul on black, it’s a foul on white because black didn’t see him and was defenseless.
@@jet2f1re dude in white went straight up and the guy in black back pedaled into him causing the contact
@@fhosu nah not from the angles I saw
@@jet2f1re Doesn't matter where your head is turned, you are responsible for where you run. 100% a foul on black. Now the fact he wasn't looking, meaning it was unintentional, would mean it is a common foul and not a card.
@@canebro1 idk I cause it just depends on the ref tbh some refs would call it some refs won’t, some refs would give a card some refs won’t so I guess it just depends on them
Ref ruined that match, annoys me they clearly don’t know the rules to my sport
Great call from the ref. Hey peeps, the guy was going for the ball, eyes on the ball, feet never left the ground, other guy jumped over him and kneed his back.
Wrong lmao white was already in the air and made contact w ball before the other guy back up into his legs
No Kamil you’re wrong the guy jumped the other guy in black has his arm up to shield not cynical, not looking at the guy he’s looking at the ball no idea where the guy in white is the guy just jumps and one doesn’t it’s not a foul on either side you don’t know ball
@@kamiloleksy1449 ^^
@@kamiloleksy1449 are we watching the same tape? white shirt jumped over the guys head going for the ball, black made no effort to go for the guy, just the ball. It was no foul, just an attempt at goal. What do you expect by jumping into the direction of another play especially so high, thats what happens. good attempt, but nothing else
@@sokolqamili3894 period. no further discussion
i would destroy both these team by myself
WTF is this goal size?
🤣🤣🤣
Indoor soccer. Smaller field, smaller teams, smaller goal.
Whoever that says that is a penalty, should go play tennis. Its a 50-50 ball and both players are attacking it.
The key to the play sir is the white player was already in the air while the other was backing up and flipped the white player, at worst it was a no call play, but the ref called it on the white team player for not being in control of his arms.
@@Thorndog LOL he didn't flip the player, he held his ground, the white had the momentum and chose to go for a header, you're soft if you think its a foul
@@sowaveysuyat Lol soft, not I have played 18 years of soccer all as a goalie and played 2 years in the NISL back in the '80s.
The white player was undercut and you are not allowed to do that and I guarantee you that 9/10 it is called but not with these refr.
@@Thorndog you are %100 right. a lot of people dont know the rules to aerial challenges. they just thing whoever got hurt the most is the victim. they dont realize the spine crushing consequences of landing on the spine.
Terrible players. Terrible ref.
my God, none of this guys can dribble? they look like robots playing. Great video and editing tho
Seems like it’s indoor soccer size not 11v11.
i would destroy both these teams by myself
ok unc 😂💀
What the hell was that. Awful.
Coach iron man?
7 : 22
Great call by the ref. White jersey climbed black jersey like a ladder.
Is this a joke?
@@anderschristensen3911 Are you blind?
No way. White jumped first, then put his hands out when black ran into him. It may have been unintentional, but 100% a foul.
Ref lost his wits and black team played arrogant. Typical rec league soccer lol
Guys like number 9 literally live for moments like these, foul hard, instigate fighting and feel super satisfied for winning an indoor league
You literally know nothing these are two of the best colleges in Canada Humber being top in the nation for colleges in the last 7 years, for some context Black lost to these guys in the first game of the group 5-1 and then won this game 2-1 how is that arrogant ? @dunzcap
@@DavidandAngeloDNA man he through a shoulder arm wasn’t even extended soft call you’re delusional
@@sokolqamili3894 says a lot of these are the best college teams in the country and they play 5 a side indoor… im the delusional one
@@DavidandAngeloDNA Yeah, number 9 is pathetic
Lol, white team wins the ball, black team guy bulldozes him with zero intention to play the ball and the ref gives free kick not a penalty?
Black paid a lot to the referee. LOL
poor defending skill by white team
None of you play ball if you think it’s a foul going either way. Actually brain dead. Both players are allowed to attack the ball, black was never going to win that and showed zero awareness of the player behind him. White won the ball fairly but is garbage so the header sucked anyways? Or maybe tried to give a pass for ez goal. Regardless no foul. Shows the state of football in North America in these comment section.
how you gonna make that entire judgement based on like 10 comments on this video lmaoo
You’re so right
@@DavidandAngeloDNA bro you know nothing all of you don’t know ball like who do you play for ? Do you ref are you involved in soccer do you even watch soccer guys like you are the ones that haven’t even played games
@@DavidandAngeloDNA am I suppose to read every single comment? Waste of my time.
@@PK.Nico5 based on this comment section, which at the time was barely 20 comments, you said that it truly showed the state of North American football. As if 20 comments represented the entire industry. Not to mention this is game was barely even at the semi-pro level, how can you make that judgement? I agree with your call on the foul situation but not your last statement lol
Ref made the right call. I think it was incidental, and a 50/50 ball but because of the area and injured player, you have to choose one for a foul. Black team jumped over the top and had his hands on white shoulders. 🤷🏻♂️
No way. White jumped first, then put his hands out when black ran into him. It may have been unintentional, but 100% a foul.
Referee is a joke
7:50 I hope the refs watch these to learn. Brown call here. Black player moved into, and under, white player while white was in the air. Automatic foul.
Nope I completely disagree. It was a collision not a foul. The white player chose to jump into "harms way" to get to the ball. The black player was running and watching the incoming ball. He has no responsibility to change anything to suit the white player.